Powder corrosion and chip-resistant coating

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10344178
  • Patent Number
    10,344,178
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 29, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 9, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A powder composition including a resin and from 5% to 70%, by weight based on powder composition weight, of a corrosion-inhibiting pigment, optionally including from 0% to 65%, by weight based on powder composition weight, zinc, the composition being substantially free from pigment providing a metallic effect is provided. The corrosion-inhibiting pigment may be present in amounts of up to 50%, by weight based on powder composition weight, for example, up to 35%. A method for coating a substrate with the powder composition and the coated substrate so formed are also provided.
Description

This invention relates to a powder composition suitable for powder coating. More particularly this invention relates to a powder composition including a resin and from 5% to 70%, by weight based on powder composition weight, of a corrosion-inhibiting pigment, the composition being substantially free from pigment providing a metallic effect. This invention also relates to a method for coating a substrate with the powder composition and a coated substrate.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,244,780 discloses powder coating compositions that comprise a film-forming polymer, a pigment such as aluminum flake providing a metallic effect and a stabilizing additive that inhibits degradation of the metallic pigment.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,018,718 discloses corrosion- and chip-resistant coatings for high tensile steel components, such as automotive coil springs, formed from a coating powder composition of “toughened” epoxy resin. In a single coat embodiment, the entire coating is loaded with at least 75 phr zinc powder. In a dual coat embodiment, an inner coat is loaded with at least 75 phr zinc and an outer, zinc-free coating is reinforced by the addition of fibers and/or by a foaming agent which renders it porous.


There has been a need for a powder composition suitable for coating a substrate, particularly a steel substrate such as, for example, high tensile steel wherein a coating formed from the composition exhibits a high level of chip resistance and corrosion resistance without relying on the use of high levels of zinc metal. The powder composition of the present invention is capable of exhibiting a high level of chip resistance and corrosion resistance without relying on the use of high levels of zinc metal.


In a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a powder composition comprising a resin and from 5% to 70%, by weight based on powder composition weight, of a corrosion-inhibiting pigment, said composition being substantially free from pigment providing a metallic effect. The corrosion-inhibiting pigment may be present in amounts of up to 50%, by weight based on powder composition weight, or up to 40%, or up to 35%.


In a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for coating a substrate comprising: forming a powder composition comprising a resin and from 5% to 70%, by weight based on powder composition weight, of a corrosion-inhibiting pigment said composition being substantially free from pigment providing a metallic effect; applying said powder composition to a substrate; and heating said powder composition to fuse and cure said applied composition. The corrosion-inhibiting pigment may be used in amounts of up to 50%, by weight based on powder composition weight, or up to 40%, or up to 35%.


In a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for coating a substrate comprising: forming a first powder composition comprising a resin and from 0% to 70%, by weight based on powder composition weight, of a corrosion-inhibiting pigment, said first powder composition being substantially tee from pigment providing a metallic effect; applying said first powder composition to said substrate; forming a second powder composition comprising a resin and from 5% to 70%, by weight based on powder composition weight, of a corrosion-inhibiting pigment said composition being substantially free from pigment providing a metallic effect; applying said second powder composition to said substrate coated with said first powder composition; and heating said applied powder compositions to fuse and cure said compositions. In each of the first and second powder compositions, the corrosion-inhibiting pigment may be present in amounts of up to 50%, by weight based on powder composition weight, or up to 40%, or up to 35%.


In a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a coated substrate comprising said substrate bearing a coating comprising a resin and from 5% to 70%, by weight based on powder composition weight, of a corrosion-inhibiting pigment. The coating may comprise corrosion-inhibiting pigment in amounts of up to 50%, by weight based on powder composition weight, or up to 40%, or up to 35%.


The powder composition of the present invention includes at least one resin, i.e., a polymeric composition suitable for powder coatings such as, for example, thermoplastic or thermoset resins, particularly an epoxy resin. The epoxy resin may be chosen from a variety of epoxy resins useful for coating powders known in the art, such as those produced by the reaction of epichlorohydrin or polyglycidyl ether and an aromatic polyol such as bisphenol, e.g., bisphenol A. The epoxy resin typically has an epoxy functionality greater than 1.0 and more preferably greater than 1.9. Generally the epoxy equivalent weight should be at least 170, but lower values may be acceptable in some cases. Preferably the epoxy equivalent weight is less than 2300, and more preferably from 800 to 1500. Such epoxy resins may be produced, for example, by an etherification reaction between an aromatic or aliphatic polyol and epichlorohydrin or dichlorohydrin in the presence of an alkali such as caustic soda. The aromatic polyol may be, for example, bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2,2-propane (i.e. bisphenol A), bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1-ethane, bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1-isobutane, bis(4-hydroxy-t-butylphenyl)-2,2-propane, bis(2-hydroxynaphthyl)methane, 4,4′-dihydroxybenzophenone or 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, diethylene glycol, methylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol or dipropylene glycol, for example diglycidyl ethers or condensed glycidyl ethers of such diols, can be used. Other oxirane group-containing polymers that can be used as the epoxy resin in hybrid powder coating compositions according to this invention include polyglycidyl-functional acrylic polymers or epoxy novolak resins. Preferred epoxy resins for use in the present invention are those based on bisphenol A.


The powder composition may further incorporate one or more of toughening, foaming, and reinforcing technologies. “Toughening technology” herein refers to modification of the resin component to provide a tougher applied coating. “Foaming technology” herein refers to powder compositions selected to engender foam structure in the applied coating. “Reinforcing technology” herein refers to additional components in the powder composition selected to reinforce the applied coating.


Epoxy resin may be toughened by the use of additives or co-reactants such as, for example, as impact modifiers, flexibilizing agents, plasticizers and tougheners. These may include:

    • elastomeric modifications, either within the base polymer, reacted into the coating composition through cross-linking, or as unreacted additives, such as, for example, CTBN rubber, butadiene/styrene, nitrile, neoprene, acrylic, butyl, ethylene/propylene/diene, polysulfide, polyisoprene, silicone, and urethane rubber;
    • random or block copolymer addition which offer some degree of internal plastication and may be exemplified by the FORTEGA™ products (Dow Chemical Co.);
    • addition of plasticizers such as epoxidized soybean oil;
    • crosslinked or noncrosslinked core/shell resins with various compositions such as epoxy, acrylic, polyurethane representing either the core or the shell portion.


Further tougheners may include hollow spherical particle including polymeric or glass beads.


Discrete microdomains of any of the above may be present and may contribute to chip resistance.


In one embodiment the epoxy resin, preferably a bisphenol A resin, is adducted to an elastomer having a Tg of −30° C. or below, preferably −40° C. or below. The preferred elastomer is CTBN rubber. Such epoxy/CTBN rubber adducts are described, for example, in U.K. Patent Specification 1,407,851 (C. G. Taylor) published Sep. 24, 1975 and Powder Coatings, 184 “Elastomer-Modified Epoxy Powder Coatings: a Review”, Apr. 13, 1984, No. 4347. To provide the toughening (flexibilizing) for cold-temperature chip resistance, the CTBN component should be present at least 5 wt % of the total of the CTBN and the epoxy components. Above about 25 wt % CTBN, no further benefit is realized and it is not desired to exceed 25 wt % lest there be insufficient epoxy component for a good cure. The fact that the elastomer component is chemically bound to the epoxy component, i.e., by esterification reaction of the carboxyl groups of the CTBN with epoxy groups, ensures that a complete phase separation does not occur during fusion and curing of the coating powder. However, there are microdomains of epoxy and rubber.


In an alternative embodiment, a core/shell resin is used in which an acrylic rubber resin forms the core and the epoxy resin, preferably a bisphenol A epoxy resin, forms the shell. Again, chemical bonding between carboxylic functionality of the acrylic rubber resin of the core and the epoxy resin of the shell prevents phase separation during fusion and curing of the coating powder formed using the core/shell resin Such acrylic rubber modified epoxies are described, for example, in Polymer Reprints, 32(3), pp. 358-9 by H-J Sue and E. I. Garcia-Melfin.


In another embodiment thermosetting epoxy resins may include either a cross-linking agent, such as a polyhydroxyl compound or a cure catalyst to effect auto cross-linking of the epoxy resin. For example, the epoxy resin is cured with a polyhydroxyl functionality having a relatively high hydroxy equivalent weight, i.e., at least about 200 up to about 500, preferably at least about 300. The relatively high hydroxy equivalent weight of the cross-linking agent ensures relatively long chain length between OH groups, which chain lengths provide flexibility to the cured coating, helping to render the coatings chip-resistant. Suitable curing agents useful in the practice of this invention are exemplified by phenolic curing agents, such as a bisphenol A end capped diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A, which is the reaction product of a diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A and bisphenol A and polyester resins with free carboxylic acid groups that are known to form “Hybrid” powder coatings. Examples of preferred phenolic curing agents for the epoxy resin component include those sold under the trademarks D.E.H.™87 and D.E.H.™85 (Dow Chemical Co.), both of which are believed to be bisphenol A end capped diglycidyl ethers of bisphenol A. Other classes of phenolic hardeners can be used as well such as phenol- and cresol-novolac curing agents sold by Dow Chemical Co. Hexion Specialty Chemicals.


Other epoxy crosslinking agents include, for example:

    • amines, including multifunctional aliphatic or aromatic primary or secondary amines, such as dicyandiamide, diaminodiphenyl sulfone;
    • tertiary amines which promote self cross-linking such as DMP 30 (Dow Chemical Co.).;
    • boron trihalides and salts thereof such as the monoethanolamine salt of boron trifluoride;
    • Organic acid salts such as VESTAGON™B55 and VESTAGON™B88 (Degussa Corp.).;
    • di and poly anhydrides such as benzophenonetetracarboxylic dianhydride (BTDA);
    • di and poly phenols such as methylene disalicylic acid; and,
    • imidazoles, substituted imidazoles and epoxy imidazole adducts such as 2-methyl imidazole or DEH 40 (Dow Chemical Co.).


The powder composition of the present invention is a resin-based composition that includes from 5% to 70%, by weight based on powder composition weight, of a corrosion-inhibiting pigment. The corrosion-inhibiting pigment may be, for example, at least one of:

    • simple molybdates such as zinc molybdate, strontium molybdate and complex molybdates such as calcium zinc molybdate, calcium zinc phosphomolybdate (eg., MOLYWHITE™ MZAP);
    • simple chromates such as zinc chromate, barium chromate, strontium Chromate, magnesium chromate, calcium chromate and complex chromates such as lead silico chromate, zinc tetraoxy chromate;
    • metal phosphides such as iron phosphide (e.g. FERROPHOS™ iron phosphide, OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP, Dallas, Tex.);
    • silicates such as zinc phosphosilicate and calcium borosilicate; and
    • simple phosphates such as iron phosphate, zinc phosphate, zinc pyrophosphate, calcium hydrogen phosphate and complex phosphates such as zinc borate orthophosphate, strontium aluminum polyphosphate, zinc aluminum polyphosphate, zinc aluminum molybdenum orthophosphate, zinc aluminum orthophosphate.


The pigments may be present in their basic form, may be organic modified, and may be present as the hydrate. Other descriptions of suitable corrosion-inhibiting pigments appear in U.S. Pat. No. 3,884,705 and are summarized by G. B. Rothenberg in Paint Additives, Noyes Data Corp, 1978, pp 175-177. U.S. Pat. No. 7,244,780 also discloses corrosion-inhibiting pigments that include “a source of stabilizing anions, advantageously phosphate ions, capable of dissolving in the presence of water”.


Zinc phosphate herein is contemplated to include (a) Zinc phosphate di- or tetra-hydrate, preferably in the form of spheroidal particles as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,137,567 (an example of zinc phosphate dihydrate being the material available under the trade name DELAPHOS™ 2M and a further example of a zinc phosphate being the available under the trade name HISPAFOS™ SP, comprising spheric particles of narrow particle size distribution); (b) Spheroidal zinc phosphate as a crystalline phase in admixture with an amorphous phase composing Fe(II) phosphate and Fe(III) phosphate. Further information concerning such materials may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,030,285; and (c) Zinc phosphate (preferably in spheroidal form) modified with zinc molybdate (such as ACTIROX™106; Microfine Minerals Ltd.)


The powder composition optionally includes from 0% to 65%, by weight based on powder composition weight, zinc; typically the zinc is in powder or flake form. Preferably the powder composition includes a minimal amount of zinc; more preferably the powder composition is free from zinc.


The powder composition of the present invention is “substantially free from pigment providing a metallic effect”, which means that the total proportion of metallic pigment(s) incorporated in the powder coating composition shall be less than 0.1% by weight (based on the weight of the composition without the metallic pigment(s)); preferably no metallic pigment is included in the powder composition. By “a pigment providing a metallic effect” herein is meant a metallic pigment typically in flake form such as, for example, aluminium or an aluminium alloy or another metal or alloy, for example, stainless steel copper, tin, bronze or brass typically used to produce various metallic effects including those referred to as “metallic”, “effect”, “lustre”, or “glamour” finishes.


The metallic pigment may be an uncoated or coated material. Examples of coated materials include pigments coated with silica or another inert inorganic material for greater chemical resistance and durability. Alternatively, the pigment may be coated with a plastics material for similar purposes, for example, an acrylic, PTFE or thermosetting plastics material, or may be provided in a polymer or plasticizer which is compatible with the film-forming binder of the powder coating composition. As a further possibility, the metallic pigment may be coated with a coloring agent such as a metal oxide pigment such as, for example, iron oxide, to provide special color effects.


Powder compositions used to provide the chip-resistant and corrosion-resistant coatings of the present invention are produced in the usual manner. The components are blended, and then are melt-compounded with heating above the melting point of the resin for a short time, e.g., 30 to 90 sec., so that no significant curing occurs. The molten compound is extruded, and after extrusion, the composition is rapidly cooled. The composition is then ground and, as necessary, the particulates sorted according to size. For electrostatic coating, the particles are generally in the 5 to 100 micron size range with a major portion generally being in the 20 to 40 micron size range. Larger particulates are useful for fluidized bed coating operations.


In the method for coating a substrate of the present invention the powder composition of the present invention is applied to the substrate and heated to fuse and cure the applied composition. In one embodiment the substrate is a metal substrate, typically a steel substrate, wherein the powder composition may be may be used, for example, as a pipe coating, rebar coating, or a coating for agricultural or construction equipment. In another embodiment the substrate is a high tensile steel substrate such as is suitable for use, for example, in coil springs in the transportation industry. Herein, high tensile steel is defined as having MPa (megapascal (N/m2) ranging from 1800 Mpa to 2100 Mpa or above; this includes super high tensile steel from 1950 Mpa to 2100 Mpa or above. Steel substrates herein are contemplated to include pretreated steel substrates, including treatments of, for example, zinc phosphate, iron phosphate, and dry in place pretreatment technology. The powder composition is typically heated at a temperature of greater than 149° C. (300° F.) for a time sufficient to fuse and substantially cure the coating such as, for example, by placing into an electric air circulating oven maintained at 160° C. (320° F.) for 20 minutes for a cured film thickness of 50 to 101 μm (2.0-4.0 mils). It is understood that thermoplastic resins do not include a cure mechanism and therefore will only fuse under healing.


In the method for coating a substrate of the present invention the powder composition may be applied as a single coat, with sufficient film thickness for chip resistance protection. In an alternative embodiment the powder composition may be applied as a single foamed coat, the foam having been engendered by the use of a separate foaming agent or by the temperature-dependent inherent foaming of certain phosphate and related constituents such as, for example, zinc phosphate. Optionally, the powder composition may incorporate reinforcing technology, that is, the composition may include carbon fibers, slip agents, barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, wollastonite, or any materials that will reinforce the coating to enhance chip resistance.


In an alternative method of the present invention a two coat method may be Employed. In such embodiments a first coat (base coat) is applied and the basecoat may be partially or fully cured. Then a subsequent second coat (top coat) is applied to the base coat and the coats are fused and cured. Either of the first coat, the second coat, or both first and second coats, independently, is formed from the powder composition of the present invention. Either of the first coat, the second coat, or both first and second coats may independently be foamed coats as described hereinabove. Either of the first coat, the second coat, or both first and second coats may independently include carbon fibers, slip agents, barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, wollastonite, or any materials that will reinforce the coating to enhance chip resistance.


The introduction of cellular foam structures is not limited to the organic portion of the protective system. For example, the steel cleaning and “pretreatment” or passivation step may introduce and or include foam forming components which generate a cellular structure within the pretreatment layer or the organic layer above it as evolved gases percolate through the film during heating. Examples of such gas generators are azo compounds, well known in the industry. Such foam may also be produced by simple decomposition or dehydration of the pretreatment chemicals themselves. Zinc phosphate (hopeite and/or phosphyllite), for example, having been deposited on cold rolled steel panels, has been shown to foam by heating to approximately 200° C.


The coated substrate of the present invention bears a coating including a resin and from 5% to 70%, by weight, based on powder composition weight, of a corrosion-inhibiting pigment, optionally further including from 0% to 65%, by weight based on powder composition weight, zinc, the composition being substantially free from pigment providing a metallic effect. It is formed by the above-described method of the present invention.







EXAMPLE 1. FORMATION OF POWDER COMPOSITIONS AND APPLICATION TO SUBSTRATES








TABLE 1.1A





Powder compositions







Zinc Phosphate-Containing Base Coat compositions









Example No.













1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
2-1



5%
10%
20%
30%
44%



Zn3(PO4)2
Zn3(PO4)2
Zn3(PO4)2
Zn3(PO4)2
Zn3(PO4)2





Epoxy resin A
92
92
92
92
92


Imidazole
3
3
3
3
3


adduct B


Carbon black
3
3
3
3
3


pigment


Hydroxy
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8


compound C


Epoxy resin D
8
8
8
8
8


Zinc Dust
0
0
0
0
0


Zinc Phosphate
6.7
14.5
32
54
100


Fumed silica
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%










Other Corrosion-Inhibiting Base Coat compositions















3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5







Epoxy resin A1
92
92
92
92
92



Imidazole adduct
3
3
3
3
3



B2



Carbon black
3
3
3
3
3



pigment



Hydroxy
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8



compound C3



Epoxy resin D4
8
8
8
8
8



Zinc Dust
237.5
225
200
175
150



Zinc Phosphate
0
0
0
0
0



FERROPHOS ™
12.5
25
50
75
100



Strontium Zinc
0
0
0
0
0



Phosphosilicate



Calcium
0
0
0
0
0



Borosilicate



Fumed Silica
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%








1Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A epoxy resin with a weight per epoxide between 935 and 1175.





2Imidazole adduct with a diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A epoxy resin.





3Bisphenol A end capped diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A with a hydroxyl equivalent weight between 370 and 400.





4Master Batch epoxy resin containing 90 wt % of a diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A epoxy resin with a weight per epoxide between 795 and 895 and 10 wt % of acrylic flow modifier.














TABLE 1.1B





Powder compositions







Zinc Phosphate-Containing Base Coat compositions









Example No.














2-2








44%



Zn3(PO4)2
2-3
2-4
2-5
2-6
Control





Epoxy resin A
92
92
92
92
92
92


Imidazole adduct B
3
3
3
3
3
3


Carbon black
3
3
3
3
3
3


pigment


Hydroxy
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8


compound C


Epoxy resin D
8
8
8
8
8
8


Zinc Dust
150
175
200
225
237
250


Zinc Phosphate
100
75
50
25
12.5
0


Fumed silica
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%










Other Corrosion-Inhibiting Base Coat compositions














4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4







Epoxy resin A1
92
92
92
92



Imidazole adduct B2
3
3
3
3



Carbon black
3
3
3
3



pigment



Hydroxy
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8



compound C3



Epoxy resin D4
8
8
8
8



Zinc Dust
0
0
0
0



Zinc Phosohste
0
0
0
0



FERROPHOS ™
0
0
0
0



Strontium Zinc
3.2
14
0
0



Phosphosilicate



Calcium Borosilicate
0
0
6.7
22.4



Fumed Silica
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%
0.30%








1Diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A epoxy resin with a weight per epoxide between 935 and 1175.





2Imidazole adduct with a diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A epoxy resin.





3Bisphenol A end capped diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A with a hydroxyl equivalent weight between 370 and 400.





4Master Batch epoxy resin containing 90 wt % of a diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A epoxy resin with a weight per epoxide between 795 and 895 and 10 wt % of acrylic flow modifier.







Powder samples were electrostatically applied onto 7.68 cm×12.8 cm×0.082 cm (3 inch×5 inch×0.032 inch) steel panels. Panels were supplied by ACT Laboratories, Inc., B-958, P-60 (Zinc Phosphate/Non Chrome Rinse). Powder coated panels were placed into an electric air circulating oven maintained at 160° C. (320° F.) for 20 minutes. Cured film thickness was 50 to 101 μm (2.0-4.0 mils).


EXAMPLE 2: EVALUATION OF POWDER COATED PANELS

Each of the coated panels exhibited a direct/reverse impact rating of 1.84 kg-m (160 in-lb)/1.84 kg·m (160 in-lb).


The coated panels of Example 1 were scribed with an ‘X’ and placed in a Salt Fog Cabinet According to ASTM Method B 117. At intervals panels were removed from the cabinet and scraped with a dull knife, perpendicularly to scribed lines. Maximum undercutting (corrosion) was measured in inches outwardly from the scribe line. Panels were typically exposed for 3000 to 4000 hours.


As shown in Table 2.1, below, the powder composition-coated panels of the present invention. Examples 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, and 2-1, exhibited a useful level of impact resistance and salt spray corrosion resistance.









TABLE 2.1







Creepback from X-scribe during ASTM B 117 Salt Spray Exposure









Example No.














Comparative
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
2-1


HOURS
66%
5%
10%
20%
30%
44%


EXPOSED
Zn Dust
Zn3(PO4)2
Zn3(PO4)2
Zn3(PO4)2
Zn3(PO4)2
Zn3(PO4)2
















192
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC


384
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC


552
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC


672
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC


840
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC


1008
NC
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32′
< 1/32″


1176
NC
NC
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32′
NC


1344
NC
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32′
< 1/32″


1512
NC
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32′
< 1/32″


1680
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32′
< 1/32″


1848
< 1/32″
< 1/32″
1/32″
1/32″
< 1/32′
< 1/32″


2016
< 1/32″
1/32″
1/32″
1/32″
1/32″
1/32″


2184
< 1/32″
1/32″
1/32″
1/32″
< 1/32″
< 1/32″


2352
< 1/32″
1/32″
1/32″
1/32″
1/32′
< 1/32″


2520
< 1/32″
> 1/32″
1/16″
1/32″
> 1/32″
< 1/32″


2688
< 1/32″
1/16″
1/16″
1/16″
1/16′
1/32″


2856
< 1/32″
1/16″
> 1/16″
1/16″
1/16′
1/16″


3024
< 1/32″
1/16″
3/32″
3/32″
3/32″
1/16″


3192
< 1/32″
1/16″
3/32″
3/32″
3/32″
1/16″


3360
1/32″
3/32″
⅛″
> 3/32″
3/32″
1/16″


3528
1/32″
3/32″
⅛″
⅛″
3/32″
1/16″


3696
1/32″
3/32″
⅛″
⅛″
3/32″
1/16″


3864
1/32″
⅛″
3/16″
⅛″
⅛″
1/16″


4056
1/16″
⅛″
>¼″
3/16″
3/16″
3/32″








Claims
  • 1. A high tensile steel substrate coated with a corrosion resistant coating formed from a powder composition fused onto the substrate, the powder composition comprising an epoxy resin based on bisphenol A, a polyhydroxyl functional phenolic curing agent having a HEW of about 200 to about 500, and from 10% to 44% by weight based on powder composition weight of at least one corrosion-inhibiting pigment selected from the group consisting of molybdates, chromates, metal phosphides, silicates and zinc phosphate, wherein the powder composition is substantially free from pigment providing a metallic effect,the powder composition comprises zinc in an amount of 0% to 65% by weight based on the powder composition, andthe powder composition is fused directly on the steel substrate or on the steel substrate pre-treated with zinc phosphate, iron phosphate, or dry-in-place pretreatment.
  • 2. The steel substrate according to claim 1, wherein the powder composition further comprises at least one technology selected from the group consisting of a toughening technology, a foaming technology, or a reinforcing technology.
  • 3. The steel substrate according to claim 2 wherein the toughening technology is selected from the group consisting of an elastomeric modifier, a random or block copolymer additive, a plasticizer, a crosslinked or non-crosslinked core/shell resin, and hollow spherical particles.
  • 4. The steel substrate according to claim 3 wherein the toughening technology is a random or block copolymer additive.
  • 5. The steel substrate according to claim 1 wherein the epoxy resin has an epoxy equivalent weight of less than 2300.
  • 6. The steel substrate according to claim 1 wherein the epoxy resin is adducted to an elastomer.
  • 7. The steel substrate according to claim 1 wherein the substrate is a steel coil spring.
  • 8. The steel substrate according to claim 1, wherein the substrate contains no zinc.
Parent Case Info

The present application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/211,847 filed on Apr. 3, 2009.

US Referenced Citations (84)
Number Name Date Kind
3170890 Boyd et al. Feb 1965 A
3245925 Watson Apr 1966 A
3336251 Manasia Aug 1967 A
3756984 Klaren et al. Sep 1973 A
3769069 Sawyer Oct 1973 A
3817946 Ree Jun 1974 A
3860557 Millar et al. Jan 1975 A
3874883 Robitaille et al. Apr 1975 A
3884705 Blair May 1975 A
3917648 McLeod Nov 1975 A
3947522 Shelley et al. Mar 1976 A
4098740 Wallace Jul 1978 A
4186036 Elms et al. Jan 1980 A
4237037 Takahashi Dec 1980 A
4313837 Vukasovich et al. Feb 1982 A
4316939 Guyomard Feb 1982 A
4345004 Miyata et al. Aug 1982 A
4381334 Balk et al. Apr 1983 A
4491554 Hamel et al. Jan 1985 A
4572868 Hosaka et al. Feb 1986 A
4581293 Saunders Apr 1986 A
4804581 Geary et al. Feb 1989 A
4933382 Kitagawa et al. Jun 1990 A
5030285 Vallvey et al. Jul 1991 A
5062284 Kubo et al. Nov 1991 A
5063095 Kitagawa et al. Nov 1991 A
5091242 Chung Feb 1992 A
5097006 Kapilow et al. Mar 1992 A
5137567 Vallvey et al. Aug 1992 A
5196261 Ono et al. Mar 1993 A
5248400 Franks et al. Sep 1993 A
5264503 Marx Nov 1993 A
5274006 Kagoshima et al. Dec 1993 A
5334631 Durand Aug 1994 A
5338347 Rohr et al. Aug 1994 A
5342885 St. Clair Aug 1994 A
5461112 Masse et al. Oct 1995 A
5468461 Hosoda et al. Nov 1995 A
5562989 Statz Oct 1996 A
5569687 Sanborn et al. Oct 1996 A
5614323 Chang Mar 1997 A
5677367 Savin Oct 1997 A
5686185 Correll et al. Nov 1997 A
5789482 Eldin et al. Aug 1998 A
5789498 Ohnishi et al. Aug 1998 A
5981086 Siminski Nov 1999 A
6022927 Decker et al. Feb 2000 A
6025438 Hinterwaldner et al. Feb 2000 A
6069221 Chasser et al. May 2000 A
6184311 O'Keeffe et al. Feb 2001 B1
6254751 Reiter et al. Jul 2001 B1
6284846 Ambrose et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294610 Daly et al. Sep 2001 B1
6346292 Grubb et al. Feb 2002 B1
6403222 Harrison Jun 2002 B1
6521706 Desai et al. Feb 2003 B1
6537610 Springer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6663968 Grubb et al. Dec 2003 B2
6677032 Grubb et al. Jan 2004 B1
6770702 Muller et al. Aug 2004 B1
7018716 Grubb et al. Mar 2006 B2
7244780 Robinson et al. Jul 2007 B1
7473717 Muenz et al. Jan 2009 B2
8192840 Kunita et al. Jun 2012 B2
20010002274 Lessmeister May 2001 A1
20010051227 Jung Dec 2001 A1
20020090823 Grubb et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020142101 Holzapfel Oct 2002 A1
20020185199 Myers et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030124248 Tullos et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040009300 Shimakura et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040101670 Grubb et al. May 2004 A1
20040266899 Muenz et al. Dec 2004 A1
20070116963 Sakakibara May 2007 A1
20070172665 Kunita et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070260003 Cinoman et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080233300 Cinoman et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090110934 Cinoman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090176903 Muenz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090270533 Umehara et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100255296 Kunita et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100256282 Breidenstein et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100297422 Lucas Nov 2010 A1
20120258316 Lucas Oct 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (65)
Number Date Country
1120253 Mar 1982 CA
1198690 Nov 1998 CN
1687269 Oct 2005 CN
101033364 Sep 2007 CN
101952374 Jan 2011 CN
3018765 Nov 1981 DE
10020481 Oct 2001 DE
0040243 Nov 1981 EP
0292771 Nov 1988 EP
0440292 Aug 1991 EP
0500009 Aug 1992 EP
0525870 Feb 1993 EP
0526153 Feb 1993 EP
0631536 Jan 1995 EP
0846710 Jun 1998 EP
0882101 Dec 1998 EP
0994141 Apr 2000 EP
1165712 Jan 2002 EP
1972672 Sep 2004 EP
1726621 Nov 2006 EP
1407851 Sep 1975 GB
1565379 Apr 1980 GB
49039625 Apr 1974 JP
58-114767 Jul 1983 JP
58114766 Jul 1983 JP
58168619 Oct 1983 JP
59029154 Feb 1984 JP
59193970 Nov 1984 JP
61148274 Jul 1986 JP
3000785 Jan 1991 JP
3-170523 Jul 1991 JP
6-9903 Jan 1994 JP
06329955 Nov 1994 JP
7026119 Jan 1995 JP
07-216297 Aug 1995 JP
8-10686 Jan 1996 JP
9012926 Jan 1997 JP
09272820 Oct 1997 JP
11188309 Jul 1999 JP
2000143938 May 2000 JP
2000-176373 Jun 2000 JP
2000190422 Jul 2000 JP
2002105393 Apr 2002 JP
2003286435 Oct 2003 JP
2004-352994 Dec 2004 JP
2006096905 Apr 2006 JP
2006096928 Apr 2006 JP
4020557 Oct 2007 JP
2007-313475 Dec 2007 JP
2007-314712 Dec 2007 JP
2007314762 Dec 2007 JP
WO9114745 Oct 1991 WO
WO9211324 Jul 1992 WO
WO9317851 Sep 1993 WO
WO0055268 Sep 2000 WO
WO2003093375 Nov 2003 WO
WO2004046245 Jun 2004 WO
WO2005028580 Mar 2005 WO
WO2006005136 Jan 2006 WO
WO2006038491 Apr 2006 WO
06052725 May 2006 WO
WO2007025007 Mar 2007 WO
WO2007138396 Dec 2007 WO
WO2009129088 Oct 2009 WO
WO2011012627 Feb 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (72)
Entry
Bulletin of the American Physical Society, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 122-123, Mar. 15-17, 1956.
Powder Coatings, vol. 184 “Elastomer-Modified Epoxy Powder Coatings: a Review,” Apr. 13, 1994, No. 4347.
Polymer Reprints, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 358-359 by H.-J Sue and E.I. Garcia-Melfin, The Division of Polymer Chemistry, Inc., American Chemical Society, Aug. 1991.
G.B. Rothenberg in Paint Additives Recent Developments, Noyes Data Corporation, 1978, pp. 175-177.
English Abstract of JP58168619A.
English Abstract of JP59193970A.
English Abstract of JP59029154A.
English Abstract of JP61148274.
English Abstract of JP2000143938A.
English Abstract of JP2000190422.
English Abstract of JP2002105393.
English Abstract of JP2003286435A.
English Abstract of JP2006096905A.
English Abstract of JP2006096928.
English Machine Translation of DE10020481.
English Machine Translation of DE3018765A1.
English Abstract of JP3170523A.
English Abstract of JP3000785A.
English Abstract of JP06329955-A.
English Abstract of JP7026119A.
English Abstract of JP9012926A.
English Abstract of JP09272820.
English Abstract of JP9039625.
Derwent English Abstract of JP58114766A.
English Abstract of JP2007314762.
English Abstract of JP4020557.
Polymer Science Dictionary, 2nd Ed., Mark Alger, Apr. 7, 1999, pp. 5-6.
Polymer Preprints, Vo. 32, No. 3, Aug. 1991, American Chemical Society, Aug. 12, 1991, pp. 358-359.
Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, vol. 3, Cellular Materials to Composites, 1985, pp. 552, 575-577.
Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, vol. 6, Emulsion Polymerization to Fibers, Manufacture, 1985, pp. 362-367.
Rubber Modified Powder Coating Resin, KR-102, Kukdo Chemical Co., Ltd. Jul. 10, 2000, pp. 1-3.
General Motors Engineering Standards, Materials and Processes-Procedures, Chip Resistance of Coating GM9508P, Jul. 1991, p. 1-8.
General Motors Engineering Standards, Materials and Processes-Procedures, Scab Corrosion Creepback of Elp Paint Systems on Metal Substrates, GM9511P, Oct. 1986, p. 1-2.
General Motors Engineering Standards, Materials and Processes-Procedures, Cass Test, Copper-Accelerated ACetic Acid Salt Spray Test (FOG), GM4476P, Nov. 1988, p. 1-5.
Polymer Wax and the Use Thereof in Powder Coatings, Zhong Jianghai, et al, pp. 1-5, Dec. 31, 2002.
Powder Coatings Foaming Agents, Dr. Tina Grubb, Computerized Literature Search, Jan. 7, 1997.
Elastomer-Modified Epoxy Powder Coatings: A Review, Ralph Drake, BF Goodrich Specialty Chemicals, Apr. 13, 1994, vol. 184, No. 4347, pp. 151-154.
Shell Chemicals Systems & Solutions Newsletter, Apollo and Resins & Versatics Join Forces, Jack Christenson, Jul. 2000, vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 1-3.
Paint Additives Recent Developments, G.B. Rothenberg, Noyes Data Corporation, 1978, pp. 175-177.
Dow Epoxy Powder Coatings, Hardeners, Oct. 2001, pp. 1-6.
Bulletin of the American Physical Society, Programme of the 1956 Mar. Meeting at Pittsburgh, PA, No. 3, Mar. 15-17, 1956, pp. 122-123.
English Translation of Chinese Application No. 2008102131717 Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2011.
English Translation of Chinese Patent Application No. 2009801023012 Office Action, dated Jul. 24, 2012.
English Translation of Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-208848 Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2011.
European Patent Application No. 08003475.4 Search Report, dated Jun. 23, 2008.
International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2009/050738 Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 8, 2010.
International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2009/050738 Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 8, 2009.
International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2010/060907 Search Report dated Mar. 22, 2011.
English Abstract of JP07-216297.
English Abstract of JP58-114767.
English Abstract of JP2000-176373.
English Translation of Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-522155 Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2013.
English Translation of Mexico Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/013642 Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2013.
English Translation Translation of Chinese Patent Application No. 201080032749.4 Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2013.
QPatent Abstract for Chinese Patent Publication 101033364A.
QPatent Abstract for Japanese Patent Publication 06-009903A.
QPatent Abstract for Japanese Patent Publication 8-010686A.
QPatent Abstract for Japanese Patent Publication 2004-352994A.
European Search Report frin related EP Application No. 10160331.4 dated Oct. 6, 2010.
European Search Report from related EP Applicaton No. 08250931.6 dated Jul. 7, 2009.
European Search Report from related EP Application No. 10156454.0 dated Jul. 22, 2010.
European Examination Report dated Nov. 23, 2010 for related EP Application No. 10156454.0.
“The Role of Additives in Powder Coatings,” Paint & Coatings Industry Magazine, Fall 1999, (http://www.pcimag.com/articles/the-role-of-additives-in-powder-coatings).
Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 24, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, 5 pages.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, 6 pages.
Advisory Action dated Nov. 5, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, 5 pages.
Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, 6 pages.
Advisory Action dated Apr. 7, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, 6 pages.
Board of Appeal Decision dated Aug. 25, 2016 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2016 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,855, filed Mar. 25, 2010, 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130273364 A1 Oct 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61211847 Apr 2009 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12661855 Mar 2010 US
Child 13904059 US