Powder distribution for laser sintering systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12145317
  • Patent Number
    12,145,317
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 22, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 19, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
There is provided improved laser sintering systems that increase the powder density and reduce anomalies of the powder layers that are sintered, that measure the laser power within the build chamber for automatic calibration during a build process, that deposit powder into the build chamber through a chute to minimize dusting, and that scrubs the air and cools the radiant heaters with recirculated scrubbed air. The improvements enable the laser sintering systems to make parts that are of higher and more consistent quality, precision, and strength, while enabling the user of the laser sintering systems to reuse greater proportions of previously used but unsintered powder.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is related to laser sintering systems, and more particularly, to laser sintering systems apparatus and methods for improving part quality and reduced disposal of used, unsintered powder.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Laser sintering is one form of additive manufacturing that fabricates three-dimensional objects from digital data. As known in the art, laser sintering heats layers of powder, typically a polymer or a metal, with a laser to cause the powder particles to fuse to one another in predetermined patterns to define the cross-sectional layers of the object being fabricated. Such techniques are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,863,538; 5,155,321; 5,252,264; 5,352,405; 6,815,636; 7,569,174; and 7,807,947, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.


One problem with laser sintering is laser attenuation during the build process whereby the laser power at the image plane (the surface of the sinterable powder being exposed to the laser beam) changes (typically decreases). Such change in laser power may be due to a number of issues and can lead to parts being different colors from the bottom to the top (along the z-axis) or having different mechanical properties along the z-axis.


Another problem with laser sintering, particularly with polymers that are heated to near the melting temperature, is that the sinterable powder that is not fused can be reused only a certain number of times before the powder produces parts with undesirable quality (such as “orange peeling” on the surface), coloration, or reduced mechanical properties. The result is that operators of laser sintering machines must dispose of a certain amount of used laser sintering powder to maintain part quality.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The various embodiments of the present invention address the above needs and achieve other advantages that improve the part quality and reduce the need to dispose of sinterable powder. One embodiment of the present invention includes methods for applying the powder layer to reduce the likelihood of surface features that can lead to reduced part strength or accuracy and that improve the density of the powder in the layer. Certain embodiments use a “two pass” approach (also called “dual APL” (APL=Apply Powder Layer)) to laying down a single layer of powder (with a counter-rotating roller or other powder distributing device) by distributing a layer of powder in a first pass similar to traditional (prior art) applications of a powder layer, but then, unlike the prior art, the roller is moved back in a second pass that distributes residual powder to fill gaps and level the surface of the powder layer. In order to distribute the residual powder from the first pass, a return powder device (such as a piston) is provided on an opposite side of the part bed (the area where the powder is laser sintered) from where the powder is deposited by a hopper. The return powder device is lowered to allow the residual powder to pass beneath the roller and is raised after the roller has passed so that the roller can distribute the residual powder. Any residual powder that remains after the second pass is deposited into a powder return shoot on the side of the part bed. By using the two pass technique, the powder layers have improved uniformity and better densification for more accurate laser sintering.


Further embodiments of the present invention include a laser power measurement device that is able to measure laser power within the build chamber. Typical laser sintering systems do not include laser power measurement devices (measurements are simply done during service by a serviceperson) or the laser power is measure prior to the laser beam entering the build chamber. The build chamber of a laser sintering system is typically very hot and includes fumes and dust that can adversely affect surfaces. The present invention provides a laser power measurement device that is within the build chamber to determine the laser power delivered to the powder layers in order to adjust or control the scan speed and/or other parameters to ensure that the power being delivered to the sinterable powder is consistent to avoid degradation or other changes in part quality or accuracy. In some embodiments, the laser power measurement device is positioned below the laser window (typically on the ceiling of the build chamber through which the laser enters the build chamber), but above the heaters that heat the sinterable powder (primarily by radiation) so that the device does not block heat delivered to the powder and/or become overheated. By having the laser power measurement device removed as much as possible from the image plane upon which the laser beam is focused, the laser is less focused and the sensing device is better able to withstand the laser without being adversely affected by the laser. In some embodiments, the laser power measurement device comprises a movable mirror that is extended from a position outside the laser scanning area into a position where the laser can be directed to the mirror to direct the laser to the sensing device. Once the measurement has been taken, the mirror can be retracted out of the way of the laser. In some embodiments, the laser power measurements are taken during the application of a new powder layer so that the build time for the part(s) is not increased. In further embodiments, the laser power measurement device is a sensor on a movable (such as rotatable) arm that may be selectively positioned for the laser to project directly onto it.


Still further embodiments of the present invention include a chute device for the deposition of powder between the roller and part bed with little or no dust being created. The chute device of certain embodiments is a rigid slot below the hopper that extends to near the surface the powder is being deposited to minimize the distance the powder must fall, thus minimizing the amount of dust created. The chute device is rotatable so that it does not interfere with the movement of the roller. The chute is also positioned so that it does not block the laser beam from the part bed. In some embodiments, the chute includes heater elements to preheat the powder to be deposited.


Other embodiments of the present invention include a roller heater positioned below or proximate the stationary roller position (where the roller is parked during the laser scanning operation) so that the roller surface may be heated to a desired temperature. The roller heater may alternatively comprise a chute heater that pre-heats powder in the chute and also heats the roller surface. The roller may be rotated so that the roller heater evenly heats the surface of the roller to prevent temperature gradients on the roller surface which can lead to undesirable adhesion of powder to some, but not all, surfaces of the roller which results in powder being slung behind the roller which further results in uneven powder surfaces that ultimately result in rough surfaces or other imperfections in the final part.


Still further embodiments of the present invention include an air scrubber that cleans the air (consisting primarily of nitrogen) within the build chamber. The air is cooled through the scrubber to assist with the removal of airborne contaminants by the filter(s). The exhaust air of the scrubber that is recirculated back into the build chamber is exhausted into a heater bracket that retains the heaters (that heat the powder by radiation and convection) in order to (i) reheat the relatively cool recirculated air and (ii) cool the heater brackets and heaters so that the heaters are not overheated. The heater brackets have exhaust holes along an outwardly facing surface so that the air is circulated back into the chamber in a way that does not create significant turbulence or other undesirable air flow that could adversely affect the laser sintering process. Therefore, the various embodiments of the present invention provide significant improvements to the laser sintering system and process that result in improved part quality and reduced waste material.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale and are meant to be illustrative and not limiting, and wherein:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a laser sintering system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a side cross-sectional view of the laser sintering system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3A is an enlarged side cross-sectional view of the roller, hopper, chute, roller heater, and other portions of the laser sintering system of FIG. 1, wherein the chute is in the down position;



FIG. 3B is an enlarged side cross-sectional view of the roller, hopper, chute, roller heater, and other portions of the laser sintering to system of FIG. 1, wherein the chute is in the up position;



FIG. 4A is an enlarged perspective view of the hopper and chute of the embodiment of FIG. 1, wherein the chute is in the down position;



FIG. 4B is an enlarged perspective view of the hopper and chute of the embodiment of FIG. 1, wherein the chute is in the up position;



FIG. 5A is a side cross-sectional view of the upper portion of the laser sintering system of FIG. 1, showing the laser power measurement device in the retracted position;



FIG. 5B is a side cross-sectional view of the upper portion of the laser sintering system of FIG. 1, showing the laser power measurement device in the extended position;



FIGS. 6A-6C are enlarged perspective views of the laser power measurement device (in the extended position) of a further embodiment of the present invention, wherein the mirror of the laser power measurement device includes a telescoping tube that protrudes into the build chamber through a sealed opening below the laser window (not shown);



FIG. 7A is an enlarged perspective view of a scrubber of the laser sintering system of FIG. 1 showing the internal passages and filters of the scrubber, as well as the check valve on top and blower motor on the side;



FIG. 7B is an enlarged side view of the scrubber of FIG. 7A showing the single scrubber inlet and the dual scrubber outlets (each outlet is in fluid communication with one heater bracket);



FIG. 7C is an enlarged perspective view of the scrubber of FIG. 7A showing the scrubber inlet and scrubber outlets and the heat sink and fan for cooling of the air to be scrubbed (filtered);



FIG. 8 is an enlarged perspective view of the laser sintering system of FIG. 1 showing the heater brackets (yellow) through which the cooled air from the scrubber outlets is reintroduced into the build chamber in order to heat the air (using the waste heat of the heaters) and to help cool the heaters; also shown is the piping/duct connecting the scrubber inlet to the opening in the build chamber above the heater brackets;



FIG. 9 is an enlarged perspective view of the laser sintering system of FIG. 1 showing the heaters and heater brackets and the passages on the sides of the heater bracket for the pre-heated air to flow into the build chamber in a direction that does not adversely affect the powder layers; and



FIG. 10 is an enlarged perspective view of the laser sintering system of FIG. 1 showing the return powder device in the raised position, wherein the return powder device is on an opposite side of the part bed from the hopper and chute.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Although apparatus and methods for providing improved part quality and reduced powder disposal are described and shown in the accompanying drawings with regard to specific types of laser sintering systems, it is envisioned that the functionality of the various apparatus and methods may be applied to any now known or hereafter devised powder fusing systems in which it is desired to created three dimensional objects (parts) out of powder based upon digital data representing the part to be made. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.


With reference to FIGS. 1-10, laser sintering systems in accordance with embodiments of the present invention are illustrated that include many novel upgrades to prior art laser sintering systems that increase part quality and reduce powder disposal. These inventions not previous known or used in the art provide significant improvement to the part quality by providing consistent energy delivery to the sinterable powder so that the material properties are improved and consistent throughout the part in all directions (x-axis (side to side in the build chamber), y-axis (front to back in the build chamber), and z-axis (bottom to top in the build chamber)). Moreover, the inventions, in particular those relating to the dual APL, provide powder layers of improved density and with no or minimum peaks, valleys, or voids that provide better flow control of laser sintered particles that enables the creation of more accurate, stronger parts and enables powder to be reused (the powder used in a laser sintering build process but not sintered) for many more build processes, thus significantly reducing the need for virgin powder (new/fresh powder that has not undergone a build process) and the need to dispose of used powder. Therefore, the present inventions significantly reduces the costs associated with laser sintering of parts, which makes parts made by laser sintering more affordable, and ultimately results in laser sintering becoming more competitive against parts made by other additive manufacturing techniques, subtractive manufacturing techniques, and other traditional manufacturing techniques.


The illustrated embodiments are designed for polymer systems that use polyamide powders or PEEK powders or other polymer powders; however, other embodiments of the present invention may be used with further materials such as metals, composites, ceramics, and any other powder materials used to form three-dimensional objects from digital data.


Turning now to the embodiment of FIG. 1, the laser sintering system 10 includes a build chamber 12, a removable part bed cart 14, and a laser assembly 16 that includes the laser, scanning mirrors and other optics similar to prior art laser sintering systems. The laser sintering system 10 also includes a control panel 18 or other user interface, such as a touch screen computer or tablet, for the operator to control and/or monitor the laser sintering system. FIG. 1 also shows portions of the laser sintering system 10 that are not inside the build chamber 12, such as the powder hopper 20, from which powder is supplied to the build chamber, and the scrubber 22 that cleans and recirculates the air (primarily nitrogen) in the build chamber.



FIG. 2 is a cross-section of the laser sintering system that illustrates additional features of the system, both inside and outside the build chamber 12. The return powder receptacle 24 receives powder that is not used during the dual APL process. Powder (not shown) deposited into the return powder receptacle 24 can be stored for later use in a subsequent build process or recirculated automatically back to the hopper 20 for use in the same or subsequent build process. FIG. 2 also illustrates components and systems within the build chamber 12 such as the roller 26, the chute 28, the image plane 30 where the powder layer is laser sintered (the top layer of the part bed 31), and the return powder device 32 (also shown in FIG. 10), which in the illustrated embodiment comprises a return powder piston. Further embodiments of the present invention comprise alternative return powder devices that transfer a portion of powder from one side of the powder distribution device to the other side of the powder distribution device in preparation for the second pass of the roller or other powder distributing device. The laser power measurement device 34 is also shown in FIG. 2 and is positioned between (along the z-axis) the laser window 36 and the heaters 38.


Certain embodiments of the present invention use the dual APL technique to distribute sinterable powder in layers. Dual APL is the process of moving the roller across the part bed 31 two times for each layer of powder distributed on the part bed. Prior art systems typically used a single pass of the roller or other powder distributing device, such as a doctor blade or a doctor blade like structure that holds powder and deposits powder as it moves across the part bed. Such systems typically have hoppers or supply powder pistons on both sides of the part bed, while other prior art systems have a single hopper but deposit powder for a first layer with a first pass and for a second layer with a second pass (by depositing powder atop the roller assembly (or other powder distributing device) and dislodging the powder on the side of the part bed opposite the hopper). Still other prior art systems use a single pass of the roller or other powder distributing device to apply powder layer in the single pass and then simply return the powder distributing device to its original position without applying a powder layer during the return movement because no powder is provided on the leading edge in the direction of the return. However, as noted below and in the enclosed documents, using the two pass dual APL process that applies powder in both the first and second passes, it has been discovered that the powder density is significantly improved, as well as quality of the surface of the powder layer applied. The density of the powder in the powder layer is important because it has been discovered that the heating and laser sintering of the denser powder is more stable as the fluence (flow) of the temporarily melted material is better controlled during laser sintering. The improved density of the layers provided by dual APL enables used powders to be used for many more build processes because even though the powder quality slightly degrades with each build process it undergoes, the used powder still can create parts with satisfactory part quality (for example, surface quality is smooth compared to prior art techniques where reused powder can lead to rough surfaces such as the well-known “orange peel” if too much powder is used too many times) and satisfactory strength. Therefore, the higher density powder layers provided by the dual APL process significantly reduce the amount of used sinterable powder that must be discarded, thus reducing the costs associated with laser sintering while providing parts of better quality and strength.


The dual APL technique comprises the following general steps:

    • 1) powder is deposited from the hopper 20 (via chute 28) to between the roller 26 and the part bed 31;
    • 2) the roller moves across the part bed to distribute the initial layer of powder over the part bed;
    • 3) the return powder device 32 is in a lowered position such that as the roller moves over the return powder device, any powder remaining from the first pass over the part bed is deposited into the gap created by the return powder device, such that the roller moves over the powder above the return powder device;
    • 4) the return powder device raises so that the powder above the return powder device is between the roller and the part bed;
    • 5) the roller moves across the part bed to distribute the remaining powder into any gaps, voids, or other portions missing powder, to level any waves or other raised portions of powder, and to increase the density of the powder layer; and
    • 6) the roller is returned to its home position (show in FIG. 2) while the laser scanning step occurs.


The dual APL is distinguishable from prior art techniques because it comprises two passes of distributing powder, which is not obvious because two passes requires additional time for each layer, which increases the build time, relative to a prior art single pass system, for each part which reduces the throughput of a laser sintering system if all other parameters are kept constant. Additional information relating to the powder density and part strength is provided in the enclosed documentation.


Turning now to FIGS. 3A-48, certain embodiments of the present invention comprise a chute 28 positioned between the hopper 20 and the surface between the roller home position (where the roller is positioned during the laser scanning operation) and the part bed so that a new supply of powder can be deposited in front of the roller before the roller's first pass across the part bed. The chute of the illustrated embodiments comprises a slot extending along the y-axis (front to back of the system) that is rotatable about an axis aligned along the y-axis. The chute 28 may be rotated automatically or it may be moved by the motion of the roller, such as by contact with at least one pin 40 positioned on the roller assembly 42 that moves the roller 26. For example, the roller 26 or other portion of the roller assembly 42 may push the chute from the down position in FIGS. 3A and 4A to the up position in FIGS. 3B and 4B at the beginning of the first pass (first API) across the part bed, and the pin 40 or other portion of the roller assembly may push the chute back to the down position at the end of the second pass (second APL) across the part bed such that the chute is always in the down position when the roller is in the home position. The chute may be spring loaded or otherwise biased to remain in the up position unless it is held in the down position by the pin 40 or other portion of the roller assembly.


The chute 28 simply serves as a conduit to deposit powder released from the hopper near the roller in a manner that minimizes dusting or other creation of airborne particles. The illustrated embodiment is a simple slot, but further embodiments of the present invention include alternative chutes that likewise reduce the dusting, spreading, or other undesirable movement of the deposited powder. The chute 28 also comprises a chute heater 44 that pre-heats the powder in the chute so that the deposited powder is closer to the temperature the powder must attain when it is spread on the part bed prior to the melting/fusing of the powder particles by the laser. By pre-heating the powder, the build process time may be reduced. Moreover, the chute heater or other heater in the area may be used to pre-heat the roller. The roller heater, whether it is the chute heater or other heater, of certain embodiments may keep the surface temperature of the roller at a desired level so that the roller distributes the powder in the desired manner. While the roller is in the home position during laser sintering of the powder layers, the roller is slowly rotated (slewed) so that the roller surface is evenly heated. Further embodiments of the present invention include alternative roller heaters to heat the surface of the roller.


Turning now to the automatic laser calibration of certain embodiments of the present invention, FIGS. 5A-6C illustrate a laser power measurement device that can selectively determine the laser power (and energy) delivered to the layer of sinterable powder. Because the build chamber is hot and includes fumes and gases that may cause surfaces, such as the laser window, to lose transparency, prior art systems have not measured the laser power within the build chamber but have instead measured the laser power prior to (upstream of) the laser beam entering the build chamber or measured the laser power during periodic servicing. Because the transparency of the laser window and the air within the build chamber may change during a single build process, certain embodiments of the present invention measure the laser power within the build chamber periodically during the build to determine changes in the laser power so that the laser can be adjusted/calibrated to ensure that the powder layers are receiving the desired amounts of energy (such as by changing the laser power or changing the scanning speed that the laser beam is moved across the powder layers).


The laser power measurement device 43 of the illustrated embodiments includes a laser power sensor of a type known in the art and a telescoping mirror 46 that may be selectively positioned in the laser path to reflect the laser beam to the sensor for measurement purposes. As shown in FIG. 5A, the mirror 46 in the retracted position is outside the range of motion of the laser beam so that the laser power measurement device does not block the laser beam from the part bed. As shown in FIG. 5B, the mirror 46 in the extended position is positioned within the range of motion of the laser beam, such as in the center, so that the laser beam may be selectively projected to the sensor within the laser power measurement device 34. FIGS. 6A-6C illustrate one embodiment of the laser power measurement device 43 in which the mirror 46 is moved by a hollow telescoping shaft that is sealed about its entrance into the build chamber 12. Further embodiments of the present invention include alternative laser power measurement devices for measuring the power of the laser beam within the build chamber.


Because the heaters 38 are radiant heaters and it is not necessary or desired that the laser power measurement device be heated and in order to not block the radiated heat from heating the powder layers, the present invention has the laser power measurement device positioned above the heaters near the laser window 36; however, further embodiments of the present invention include the laser power measurement device at any location in the build chamber where the laser can be in optical communication with the laser power measurement device.


The present invention also includes in certain embodiments a scrubber to clean and filter the air within the build chamber. FIGS. 7A-7C illustrate a scrubber 22 in accordance with one embodiment, that includes an initial cooling section 48 and a filtration section 50. The scrubber 22 includes a scrubber inlet 52 through which air is pulled from the build chamber 12 (such as from above the heaters 38 and below the laser window 36) and two scrubber outlets 54 through which air is expelled back to the build chamber (such as into a heater bracket as described below). The cooling section 48 is a serpentine passage or other structure that causes the relatively hot air from the build chamber 12 to be cooled, such as with the use of a heat sink and fan assembly 56 in thermal communication with the passages in the cooling section. The air is cooled to assist in the precipitation of contaminants from the air. The air is then passed through the filter section 50 comprising one or more filters that capture the contaminants from the air passing therethrough. The air is circulated through the scrubber 22 by the blower fan 58 rotated by the blower motor 60.



FIGS. 8 and 9 show the pipe or tubing that connects the build chamber to the scrubber inlet 52, as well as one of the build chamber inlets 62 for the return of the air from the scrubber. The build chamber inlets 62 are in flow communication with the respective heater bracket 64 in the build chamber 12. The relatively cool air from the scrubber flows into the heater bracket 64 in order to transfer heat from the heater bracket 64 and the heaters 38, thereby (i) assisting in the cooling of the heaters, which in some embodiments is desirable to increase the operable life of the heaters and/or to increase the performance of the heaters, and (ii) pre-heating returned scrubbed air. The pre-heated air passes out of the array of holes on the side of each heater bracket 64. The array of holes are sized and positioned to minimize the amount of turbulence or other undesirable air flow within the build chamber (for example, the powder should not be moved by the air in the build chamber).


The enclosed documentation further describes the apparatus and processes of the present invention, as well as test results produced therefrom. For example, the chart entitled MP Data show the significant improvements in mechanical properties relative to prior art techniques. The columns of the MP Data chart are for “Recycle Runs” where runs 1 through 4 were conducted without adding any new powder to determine the deterioration in part mechanical properties based upon the lack of new/fresh/virgin powder. The Recycle Runs were used to make a plurality of ASTM638 bars for which the mechanical properties of Table 1 were tested for in accordance with industry standard practices known by those of skill in the art. The Recycle Runs included the respective amounts of fresh (previously unused powder), overflow (powder previously used but retrieved from overflow reservoir and not the part cake), and part cake (powder previously used and retrieved from the part cake). The Recycle Runs were conducted with generally consistent build parameters and part parameters, including but not limited to a fill laser power of 60 W, a fill scan count of 1, a fill scan speed of 12 M/sec, an outline laser power of 15 W, an outline fill scan count of 1, a slicer fill scan spacing of 0.2 mm, and a sinter scan of 1. As evidenced by the results for Runs 1, 2, and 4, the decreases in mean density, tensile modulus, and tensile strength are significantly improved compared to prior art laser sintering apparatus and methods. Test data such as provided in the MP Data chart demonstrate that the embodiments of the present invention can be used to reduce the need for virgin powder and the corresponding need to dispose of used powder.









TABLE 1







MP Data













Recycle
Recycle
Recycle
Recycle
Recycle


Mechanical Properties
Run 0
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4















Density (LT Front) (g/cc)

0.975
0.971

09.67


Density (RT Front) (g/cc)

0.973
0.974

0.957


Density (Middle) (g/cc)

0.973
0.974

0.964


Density (LT Back) (g/cc)

0.973
0.968

0.964


Density (RT Back) (g/cc)

0.971
0.974

0.957


MEAN DENSITY

0.973
0.972

0.962


Tensile Modulus (X)

1911
1925

1798


Tensile Modulus (X)

1887
1948

1771


Tensile Modulus (X)

1878
1938

1845


Tensile Modulus (X)

1939
1917

1801


X MEAN MODULUS

1903.75
1932.00

1803.75


Tensile Modulus (Y)

1962
1855

1904


Tensile Modulus (Y)

2012
1946

1893


Tensile Modulus (Y)

1872
1897

1945


Tensile Modulus (Y)

1878
1861

1794


Y MEAN MODULUS

1929.75
1889.75

1884.00


Tensile Modulus (Z)

1924
2003

1761


Tensile Modulus (Z)

1934
1879

2150


Tensile Modulus (Z)

1938
2003

1863


Tensile Modulus (Z)

1915
1856

1879


Z MEAN MODULUS

1927.75
1935.25

1913.25


Tensile Strength (X)

50.4
49.5

48.9


Tensile Strength (X)

50.3
50.0

47.4


Tensile Strength (X)

49.7
49.7

49.4


Tensile Strength (X)

49.4
48.8

47.8


X MEAN STRENGTH

50.0
49.5

48.4


Tensile Strength (Y)

50.4
48.6

48.6


Tensile Strength (Y)

50.6
50.2

49.4


Tensile Strength (Y)

49.3
50.1

49.0


Tensile Strength (Y)

49.0
48.5

47.7


Y MEAN STRENGTH

49.8
49.4

48.7


Tensile Strength (Z)

49.1
47.7

46.7


Tensile Strength (Z)

49.8
48.2

47.6


Tensile Strength (Z)

50.4
47.0

45.8


Tensile Strength (Z)

48.1
48.1

46.9


Z MEAN STRENGTH

49.4
47.8

46.8


Elongation at Break (X)

18.137%
14.727%

19.061%


Elongation at Break (X)

18.975%
19.577%

17.212%


Elongation at Break (X)

15.976%
20.259%

17.724%


Elongation at Break (X)

14.579%
16.321%

22.901%


X MEAN EAB

16.917%
17.716%

19.225%


Elongation at Break (Y)

14.991%
14.734%

15.401%


Elongation at Break (Y)

16.680%
16.386%

22.648%


Elongation at Break (Y)

13.161%
19.850%

24.640%


Elongation at Break (Y)

17.391%
17.899%

16.648%


Y MEAN EAB

15.556%
17.217%

19.834%


Elongation at Break (Z)

8.324%
7.075%

8.899%


Elongation at Break (Z)

8.328%
6.926%

5.981%


Elongation at Break (Z)

9.280%
5.626%

5.724%


Elongation at Break (Z)

6.944%
6.297%

7.321%


Z MEAN EAB

8.219%
6.482%

6.981%









The present invention in various embodiments combines the above apparatus and methods to improve the part quality of laser sintered parts and to improve the useful life of unused laser sinterable powders. Thus, the present invention provides significant technical and financial benefits to users of laser sintering systems that were previously unavailable through prior art technologies.


Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which the invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. It is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.


Accordingly, the present invention provides for the production of three-dimensional objects with improved build and support materials. Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which the invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. It is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.


The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A laser sintering system for fabricating three dimensional objects based upon design data and from a sinterable powder, the laser sintering system comprising: a laser;a build chamber;at least one heater bracket; andan air scrubber comprising a filtration section that cleans and recirculates air within the build chamber, wherein the heater bracket is in flow communication with the air scrubber and the air scrubber exhausts air through the heater bracket into the build chamber, wherein the heater bracket is positioned at a build chamber inlet.
  • 2. The laser sintering system of claim 1, wherein the scrubber includes a scrubber inlet through which air is pulled from the build chamber.
  • 3. The laser sintering system of claim 2, wherein the scrubber comprises tubing that connects the build chamber to the scrubber inlet and to a build chamber inlet for the return of the air to the build chamber from the scrubber.
  • 4. The laser sintering system of claim 2, wherein the scrubber includes two scrubber outlets through which exhaust air is expelled back to the build chamber.
  • 5. The laser sintering system of claim 1, wherein the scrubber includes an initial cooling section.
  • 6. The laser sintering system of claim 5, wherein the cooling section comprises one or more passages.
  • 7. The laser sintering system of claim 6, wherein the scrubber further comprises a heat sink and/or a fan assembly in thermal communication with the passages in the cooling section.
  • 8. The laser sintering system of claim 5, wherein the filtration section comprises one or more filters that capture contaminants from the air passing therethrough.
  • 9. The laser sintering system of claim 1, wherein air is circulated through the scrubber by a blower fan rotated by a blower motor.
  • 10. The laser sintering system of claim 1 wherein the heater bracket supports at least one heater.
  • 11. The laser sintering system of claim 10, wherein the heater bracket has one or more exhaust holes along an outwardly facing surface of the bracket.
  • 12. The laser sintering system of claim 10, wherein the air is pulled from the build chamber from above the at least one heater.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/265,998, filed Sep. 15, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/212,770, filed Mar. 14, 2014, which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 (e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/793,870, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, the contents of each of which are herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (187)
Number Name Date Kind
4247508 Housholder Jan 1981 A
4863538 Deckard Sep 1989 A
4944817 Bourell et al. Jul 1990 A
5017753 Deckard May 1991 A
5132143 Deckard Jul 1992 A
5147587 Marcus Sep 1992 A
5155324 Deckard Oct 1992 A
5182170 Marcus et al. Jan 1993 A
5216235 Lin Jun 1993 A
5252264 Forderhase Oct 1993 A
5354414 Feygin Oct 1994 A
5427733 Benda et al. Jun 1995 A
5530221 Benda et al. Jun 1996 A
5534104 Langer et al. Jul 1996 A
5536467 Reichle et al. Jul 1996 A
5594652 Penn Jan 1997 A
5647931 Retallick et al. Jul 1997 A
5658412 Retallick et al. Aug 1997 A
5665401 Serbin et al. Sep 1997 A
5730925 Mattes et al. Mar 1998 A
5733497 McAlea et al. Mar 1998 A
5753171 Serbin et al. May 1998 A
5753274 Wilkening et al. May 1998 A
5786562 Larson Jul 1998 A
5817206 McAlea et al. Oct 1998 A
5832415 Wilkening Nov 1998 A
5846370 O'Connor Dec 1998 A
5876550 Feygin et al. Mar 1999 A
5876767 Mattes et al. Mar 1999 A
5897825 Fruth et al. Apr 1999 A
5904889 Serbin et al. May 1999 A
5904890 Lohner et al. May 1999 A
5908569 Wilkening et al. Jun 1999 A
5934343 Gaylo Aug 1999 A
6007318 Russell Dec 1999 A
6042774 Wilkening et al. Mar 2000 A
6066285 Kumar May 2000 A
6085122 Manning Jun 2000 A
6136257 Graf et al. Oct 2000 A
6151345 Gray Nov 2000 A
6155331 Langer et al. Dec 2000 A
6169605 Penn Jan 2001 B1
6213168 Gaylo Apr 2001 B1
6425281 Sheriff et al. Jul 2002 B1
6483596 Philippi et al. Nov 2002 B1
6554600 Hofmann et al. Apr 2003 B1
6596224 Sachs Jul 2003 B1
6600129 Shen et al. Jul 2003 B2
6617546 Manetsberger et al. Sep 2003 B2
6672343 Perret et al. Jan 2004 B1
6677554 Darrah et al. Jan 2004 B2
6694207 Darrah et al. Feb 2004 B2
6764636 Allanic Jul 2004 B1
6814926 Geving et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815636 Chung et al. Nov 2004 B2
6823928 Sercombe et al. Nov 2004 B2
6824714 Turck et al. Nov 2004 B1
6848494 Newell et al. Feb 2005 B2
6858816 Manetsberger et al. Feb 2005 B2
6930278 Chung Aug 2005 B1
6932935 Oberhofer et al. Aug 2005 B1
7521652 Chung et al. Jan 2006 B2
6997232 Sercombe et al. Feb 2006 B2
7036550 Schaffer et al. May 2006 B2
7153463 Leuterer et al. Dec 2006 B2
7261542 Hickerson et al. Aug 2007 B2
7296599 Cox Nov 2007 B2
7297304 Swanson et al. Nov 2007 B2
7357629 Weiskopf et al. Apr 2008 B2
7419632 Keller Sep 2008 B2
7464733 Cox Dec 2008 B2
7569174 Ruatta et al. Aug 2009 B2
7601422 Gersch et al. Oct 2009 B2
7614866 Sperry et al. Nov 2009 B2
7628600 Perret Dec 2009 B2
7647107 Perret et al. Jan 2010 B2
7661948 Perret et al. Feb 2010 B2
7665979 Heugel Feb 2010 B2
7686005 Adams Mar 2010 B2
7713048 Perret et al. May 2010 B2
7740683 Thorsson et al. Jun 2010 B2
7748971 Hochsmann Jul 2010 B2
7790096 Merot et al. Sep 2010 B2
7807947 Partannen et al. Oct 2010 B2
7820241 Perret et al. Oct 2010 B2
7837458 Perret et al. Nov 2010 B2
7847057 Muller et al. Dec 2010 B2
7850885 Philippi et al. Dec 2010 B2
7887316 Cox Feb 2011 B2
7891095 Jonsson et al. Feb 2011 B2
7931462 Mattes Apr 2011 B2
7946840 Perret et al. May 2011 B2
7976302 Halder et al. Jul 2011 B2
8031384 Perret et al. Oct 2011 B2
8032479 Dimter et al. Oct 2011 B2
8073315 Philippi Dec 2011 B2
8075814 Fruth et al. Dec 2011 B2
8083513 Montero-Escuder et al. Dec 2011 B2
8119053 Bedal et al. Feb 2012 B1
8124192 Paasche et al. Feb 2012 B2
8137739 Philippi et al. Mar 2012 B2
8172562 Mattes May 2012 B2
8186990 Perret et al. May 2012 B2
8299208 Muller et al. Jul 2012 B2
8260447 Mattes et al. Sep 2012 B2
8303886 Philippi Nov 2012 B2
8313087 Hesse et al. Nov 2012 B2
8317508 Bokodi et al. Nov 2012 B2
8366432 Perret et al. Feb 2013 B2
8414281 Schleiss et al. Apr 2013 B2
8420001 Leuterer et al. Apr 2013 B2
8501075 Philippi et al. Aug 2013 B2
8525071 Lueterer Sep 2013 B2
8794263 Scott et al. Aug 2014 B2
8877874 Paternoster Nov 2014 B2
20010050448 Kubo et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020090313 Wang et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020104973 Kerekes Aug 2002 A1
20030201255 Manetsberger Oct 2003 A1
20040005182 Gaylo Jan 2004 A1
20040012112 Davidson Jan 2004 A1
20040061260 Heugel Apr 2004 A1
20040200816 Chung Oct 2004 A1
20050207931 Hesse et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050242473 Newell et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050263933 Welch, IV Dec 2005 A1
20050263934 Chung Dec 2005 A1
20060214335 Cox Sep 2006 A1
20060215246 Kerekes Sep 2006 A1
20060219315 Cox Oct 2006 A1
20070057412 Weiskofp et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070063372 Nielsen Mar 2007 A1
20070087071 Devos Apr 2007 A1
20070267784 Greiner Nov 2007 A1
20070298182 Hans et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080006958 Davidson Jan 2008 A1
20080036117 Hickerson et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080122141 Bedal et al. May 2008 A1
20080131539 Perret Jun 2008 A1
20080152910 Hesse et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080169589 Sperry Jul 2008 A1
20080181977 Sperry Jul 2008 A1
20080190905 Heinlein Aug 2008 A1
20080211132 Feenstra Sep 2008 A1
20090025638 Inoue Jan 2009 A1
20090045553 Weidinger et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090047165 Syvanen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090152771 Philippi et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090223944 Sukhman Sep 2009 A1
20090266803 Perret et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090283109 Moussa Nov 2009 A1
20090283119 Moussa Nov 2009 A1
20090291308 Pfister Nov 2009 A1
20090295042 Pfister et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090321998 Gersch et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100044547 Higashi et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100140550 Keller et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100155985 McAlea et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100264302 Philippi Oct 2010 A1
20100270713 Frangov et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110122381 Hickerson et al. May 2011 A1
20110133367 Weidinger et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110165340 Baumann Jul 2011 A1
20110168091 Baumann et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110174552 Ahmed Jul 2011 A1
20110221099 Oberhofer et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110237731 Paternoster Sep 2011 A1
20110278773 Bokodi et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110293771 Oberhofer et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120045617 Yasukochi Feb 2012 A1
20120070666 Gersch et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120090734 Heinlein Apr 2012 A1
20120107438 Bokodi et al. May 2012 A1
20120107496 Thoma May 2012 A1
20120164322 Teulet Jun 2012 A1
20120192718 Sukhman et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120267813 Perret et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130000553 Hoechsmann et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130064707 Matsui Mar 2013 A1
20130171019 Gessler et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130330470 Gersch et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140178588 Swanson Jun 2014 A1
20140265045 Cullen Sep 2014 A1
20140287080 Scott et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140329953 Paternoster Nov 2014 A1
20140363585 Pialot Dec 2014 A1
20150298394 Sheinman Oct 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
1135732 Nov 1996 CN
4400523 Jul 1995 DE
10360094 Sep 2005 DE
1700686 Sep 2006 EP
1704989 Sep 2006 EP
1771267 Apr 2007 EP
8502703 Mar 1996 JP
9507882 Aug 1997 JP
2001038812 Feb 2001 JP
2001-334581 Dec 2001 JP
2003-245981 Sep 2003 JP
2004-306612 Nov 2004 JP
2006-248231 Sep 2006 JP
2011-202165 Oct 2011 JP
2012-501828 Jan 2012 JP
9511100 Apr 1995 WO
9534468 Dec 1995 WO
0181031 Nov 2001 WO
2004056512 Jul 2004 WO
2007-147221 Dec 2007 WO
2010061174 Jun 2010 WO
2010095987 Aug 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (26)
Entry
European Search Report for Application No. EP 05007528.2, Date of Completion of Search Sep. 16, 2005 (3 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 05007626.4, Date of Completion of Search Sep. 16, 2005 (3 pages).
German Examination Report for Application No. DE 102005015985.0, dated Jan. 31, 2006 (4 pages—no English translation).
German Examination Report for Application No. DE 102005015986.0, dated Feb. 2, 2006 (4 pages—no English translation).
European Examination Report for Application No. EP 05007528.2, dated Dec. 12, 2006 (4 pages).
European Examination Report for Application No. EP 05007528.2, dated Nov. 7, 2007 (3 pages).
European Examination Report for Application No. EP 05007626.4, dated Aug. 11, 2006 (5 pages).
Japanese Office Action for Counterpart Japanese Application No. JP 2005-155059, dated Jan. 22, 2008 (2 pages).
Japanese Office Action for Application No. JP 2005-155060, dated Jan. 30, 2008 (2 pages).
Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,289.
Office Action mailed Jan. 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,303.
PCT Partial International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Oct. 15, 2014 (6 pages).
PCT International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028671 mailed Sep. 3, 2014 (6 pages).
PCT Written Opinion for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028671 mailed Sep. 3, 2014 (8 pages).
PCT International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Jan. 5, 2015 (8 pages).
PCT Written Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Jan. 5, 2015 (10 pages).
PCT Preliminary International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028671 mailed Sep. 24, 2015 (2 pages).
PCT Written Opinion for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028671 mailed Sep. 24, 2015 (8 pages).
PCT Preliminary International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Sep. 24, 2015 (2 pages).
PCT Written Opinion for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Sep. 24, 2015 (10 pages).
English translation of Chinese First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026835.2 dated Jul. 4, 2016 (11 pages).
English translation of Japan's First Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2106-502848 dated Aug. 16, 2016 (5 pages).
English translation of Chinese First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026842.2 dated Jan. 3, 2017 (15 pages).
English translation of Chinese Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026842.2 dated Nov. 9, 2017 (6 pages).
European Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 19712241.2 dated Aug. 27, 2019 (9 pages).
European Patent Communication for European Application No. 22164716.7 dated Jul. 21, 2023 (7 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220324173 A1 Oct 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61793870 Mar 2013 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15265998 Sep 2016 US
Child 17846413 US
Parent 14212770 Mar 2014 US
Child 15265998 US