The present invention is related to laser sintering systems, and more particularly, to laser sintering systems apparatus and methods for improving part quality and reduced disposal of used, unsintered powder.
Laser sintering is one form of additive manufacturing that fabricates three-dimensional objects from digital data. As known in the art, laser sintering heats layers of powder, typically a polymer or a metal, with a laser to cause the powder particles to fuse to one another in predetermined patterns to define the cross-sectional layers of the object being fabricated. Such techniques are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,863,538; 5,155,321; 5,252,264; 5,352,405; 6,815,636; 7,569,174; and 7,807,947, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
One problem with laser sintering is laser attenuation during the build process whereby the laser power at the image plane (the surface of the sinterable powder being exposed to the laser beam) changes (typically decreases). Such change in laser power may be due to a number of issues and can lead to parts being different colors from the bottom to the top (along the z-axis) or having different mechanical properties along the z-axis.
Another problem with laser sintering, particularly with polymers that are heated to near the melting temperature, is that the sinterable powder that is not fused can be reused only a certain number of times before the powder produces parts with undesirable quality (such as “orange peeling” on the surface), coloration, or reduced mechanical properties. The result is that operators of laser sintering machines must dispose of a certain amount of used laser sintering powder to maintain part quality.
The various embodiments of the present invention address the above needs and achieve other advantages that improve the part quality and reduce the need to dispose of sinterable powder. One embodiment of the present invention includes methods for applying the powder layer to reduce the likelihood of surface features that can lead to reduced part strength or accuracy and that improve the density of the powder in the layer. Certain embodiments use a “two pass” approach (also called “dual APL” (APL=Apply Powder Layer)) to laying down a single layer of powder (with a counter-rotating roller or other powder distributing device) by distributing a layer of powder in a first pass similar to traditional (prior art) applications of a powder layer, but then, unlike the prior art, the roller is moved back in a second pass that distributes residual powder to fill gaps and level the surface of the powder layer. In order to distribute the residual powder from the first pass, a return powder device (such as a piston) is provided on an opposite side of the part bed (the area where the powder is laser sintered) from where the powder is deposited by a hopper. The return powder device is lowered to allow the residual powder to pass beneath the roller and is raised after the roller has passed so that the roller can distribute the residual powder. Any residual powder that remains after the second pass is deposited into a powder return shoot on the side of the part bed. By using the two pass technique, the powder layers have improved uniformity and better densification for more accurate laser sintering.
Further embodiments of the present invention include a laser power measurement device that is able to measure laser power within the build chamber. Typical laser sintering systems do not include laser power measurement devices (measurements are simply done during service by a serviceperson) or the laser power is measure prior to the laser beam entering the build chamber. The build chamber of a laser sintering system is typically very hot and includes fumes and dust that can adversely affect surfaces. The present invention provides a laser power measurement device that is within the build chamber to determine the laser power delivered to the powder layers in order to adjust or control the scan speed and/or other parameters to ensure that the power being delivered to the sinterable powder is consistent to avoid degradation or other changes in part quality or accuracy. In some embodiments, the laser power measurement device is positioned below the laser window (typically on the ceiling of the build chamber through which the laser enters the build chamber), but above the heaters that heat the sinterable powder (primarily by radiation) so that the device does not block heat delivered to the powder and/or become overheated. By having the laser power measurement device removed as much as possible from the image plane upon which the laser beam is focused, the laser is less focused and the sensing device is better able to withstand the laser without being adversely affected by the laser. In some embodiments, the laser power measurement device comprises a movable mirror that is extended from a position outside the laser scanning area into a position where the laser can be directed to the mirror to direct the laser to the sensing device. Once the measurement has been taken, the mirror can be retracted out of the way of the laser. In some embodiments, the laser power measurements are taken during the application of a new powder layer so that the build time for the part(s) is not increased. In further embodiments, the laser power measurement device is a sensor on a movable (such as rotatable) arm that may be selectively positioned for the laser to project directly onto it.
Still further embodiments of the present invention include a chute device for the deposition of powder between the roller and part bed with little or no dust being created. The chute device of certain embodiments is a rigid slot below the hopper that extends to near the surface the powder is being deposited to minimize the distance the powder must fall, thus minimizing the amount of dust created. The chute device is rotatable so that it does not interfere with the movement of the roller. The chute is also positioned so that it does not block the laser beam from the part bed. In some embodiments, the chute includes heater elements to preheat the powder to be deposited.
Other embodiments of the present invention include a roller heater positioned below or proximate the stationary roller position (where the roller is parked during the laser scanning operation) so that the roller surface may be heated to a desired temperature. The roller heater may alternatively comprise a chute heater that pre-heats powder in the chute and also heats the roller surface. The roller may be rotated so that the roller heater evenly heats the surface of the roller to prevent temperature gradients on the roller surface which can lead to undesirable adhesion of powder to some, but not all, surfaces of the roller which results in powder being slung behind the roller which further results in uneven powder surfaces that ultimately result in rough surfaces or other imperfections in the final part.
Still further embodiments of the present invention include an air scrubber that cleans the air (consisting primarily of nitrogen) within the build chamber. The air is cooled through the scrubber to assist with the removal of airborne contaminants by the filter(s). The exhaust air of the scrubber that is recirculated back into the build chamber is exhausted into a heater bracket that retains the heaters (that heat the powder by radiation and convection) in order to (i) reheat the relatively cool recirculated air and (ii) cool the heater brackets and heaters so that the heaters are not overheated. The heater brackets have exhaust holes along an outwardly facing surface so that the air is circulated back into the chamber in a way that does not create significant turbulence or other undesirable air flow that could adversely affect the laser sintering process. Therefore, the various embodiments of the present invention provide significant improvements to the laser sintering system and process that result in improved part quality and reduced waste material.
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale and are meant to be illustrative and not limiting, and wherein:
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Although apparatus and methods for providing improved part quality and reduced powder disposal are described and shown in the accompanying drawings with regard to specific types of laser sintering systems, it is envisioned that the functionality of the various apparatus and methods may be applied to any now known or hereafter devised powder fusing systems in which it is desired to created three dimensional objects (parts) out of powder based upon digital data representing the part to be made. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
With reference to
The illustrated embodiments are designed for polymer systems that use polyamide powders or PEEK powders or other polymer powders; however, other embodiments of the present invention may be used with further materials such as metals, composites, ceramics, and any other powder materials used to form three-dimensional objects from digital data.
Turning now to the embodiment of
Certain embodiments of the present invention use the dual APL technique to distribute sinterable powder in layers. Dual APL is the process of moving the roller across the part bed 31 two times for each layer of powder distributed on the part bed. Prior art systems typically used a single pass of the roller or other powder distributing device, such as a doctor blade or a doctor blade like structure that holds powder and deposits powder as it moves across the part bed. Such systems typically have hoppers or supply powder pistons on both sides of the part bed, while other prior art systems have a single hopper but deposit powder for a first layer with a first pass and for a second layer with a second pass (by depositing powder atop the roller assembly (or other powder distributing device) and dislodging the powder on the side of the part bed opposite the hopper). Still other prior art systems use a single pass of the roller or other powder distributing device to apply powder layer in the single pass and then simply return the powder distributing device to its original position without applying a powder layer during the return movement because no powder is provided on the leading edge in the direction of the return. However, as noted below and in the enclosed documents, using the two pass dual APL process that applies powder in both the first and second passes, it has been discovered that the powder density is significantly improved, as well as quality of the surface of the powder layer applied. The density of the powder in the powder layer is important because it has been discovered that the heating and laser sintering of the denser powder is more stable as the fluence (flow) of the temporarily melted material is better controlled during laser sintering. The improved density of the layers provided by dual APL enables used powders to be used for many more build processes because even though the powder quality slightly degrades with each build process it undergoes, the used powder still can create parts with satisfactory part quality (for example, surface quality is smooth compared to prior art techniques where reused powder can lead to rough surfaces such as the well-known “orange peel” if too much powder is used too many times) and satisfactory strength. Therefore, the higher density powder layers provided by the dual APL process significantly reduce the amount of used sinterable powder that must be discarded, thus reducing the costs associated with laser sintering while providing parts of better quality and strength.
The dual APL technique comprises the following general steps:
The dual APL is distinguishable from prior art techniques because it comprises two passes of distributing powder, which is not obvious because two passes requires additional time for each layer, which increases the build time, relative to a prior art single pass system, for each part which reduces the throughput of a laser sintering system if all other parameters are kept constant. Additional information relating to the powder density and part strength is provided in the enclosed documentation.
Turning now to
The chute 28 simply serves as a conduit to deposit powder released from the hopper near the roller in a manner that minimizes dusting or other creation of airborne particles. The illustrated embodiment is a simple slot, but further embodiments of the present invention include alternative chutes that likewise reduce the dusting, spreading, or other undesirable movement of the deposited powder. The chute 28 also comprises a chute heater 44 that pre-heats the powder in the chute so that the deposited powder is closer to the temperature the powder must attain when it is spread on the part bed prior to the melting/fusing of the powder particles by the laser. By pre-heating the powder, the build process time may be reduced. Moreover, the chute heater or other heater in the area may be used to pre-heat the roller. The roller heater, whether it is the chute heater or other heater, of certain embodiments may keep the surface temperature of the roller at a desired level so that the roller distributes the powder in the desired manner. While the roller is in the home position during laser sintering of the powder layers, the roller is slowly rotated (slewed) so that the roller surface is evenly heated. Further embodiments of the present invention include alternative roller heaters to heat the surface of the roller.
Turning now to the automatic laser calibration of certain embodiments of the present invention,
The laser power measurement device 43 of the illustrated embodiments includes a laser power sensor of a type known in the art and a telescoping mirror 46 that may be selectively positioned in the laser path to reflect the laser beam to the sensor for measurement purposes. As shown in
Because the heaters 38 are radiant heaters and it is not necessary or desired that the laser power measurement device be heated and in order to not block the radiated heat from heating the powder layers, the present invention has the laser power measurement device positioned above the heaters near the laser window 36; however, further embodiments of the present invention include the laser power measurement device at any location in the build chamber where the laser can be in optical communication with the laser power measurement device.
The present invention also includes in certain embodiments a scrubber to clean and filter the air within the build chamber.
The enclosed documentation further describes the apparatus and processes of the present invention, as well as test results produced therefrom. For example, the chart entitled MP Data show the significant improvements in mechanical properties relative to prior art techniques. The columns of the MP Data chart are for “Recycle Runs” where runs 1 through 4 were conducted without adding any new powder to determine the deterioration in part mechanical properties based upon the lack of new/fresh/virgin powder. The Recycle Runs were used to make a plurality of ASTM638 bars for which the mechanical properties of Table 1 were tested for in accordance with industry standard practices known by those of skill in the art. The Recycle Runs included the respective amounts of fresh (previously unused powder), overflow (powder previously used but retrieved from overflow reservoir and not the part cake), and part cake (powder previously used and retrieved from the part cake). The Recycle Runs were conducted with generally consistent build parameters and part parameters, including but not limited to a fill laser power of 60 W, a fill scan count of 1, a fill scan speed of 12 M/sec, an outline laser power of 15 W, an outline fill scan count of 1, a slicer fill scan spacing of 0.2 mm, and a sinter scan of 1. As evidenced by the results for Runs 1, 2, and 4, the decreases in mean density, tensile modulus, and tensile strength are significantly improved compared to prior art laser sintering apparatus and methods. Test data such as provided in the MP Data chart demonstrate that the embodiments of the present invention can be used to reduce the need for virgin powder and the corresponding need to dispose of used powder.
The present invention in various embodiments combines the above apparatus and methods to improve the part quality of laser sintered parts and to improve the useful life of unused laser sinterable powders. Thus, the present invention provides significant technical and financial benefits to users of laser sintering systems that were previously unavailable through prior art technologies.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which the invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. It is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
Accordingly, the present invention provides for the production of three-dimensional objects with improved build and support materials. Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which the invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. It is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/265,998, filed Sep. 15, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/212,770, filed Mar. 14, 2014, which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 (e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/793,870, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, the contents of each of which are herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4247508 | Housholder | Jan 1981 | A |
4863538 | Deckard | Sep 1989 | A |
4944817 | Bourell et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5017753 | Deckard | May 1991 | A |
5132143 | Deckard | Jul 1992 | A |
5147587 | Marcus | Sep 1992 | A |
5155324 | Deckard | Oct 1992 | A |
5182170 | Marcus et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5216235 | Lin | Jun 1993 | A |
5252264 | Forderhase | Oct 1993 | A |
5354414 | Feygin | Oct 1994 | A |
5427733 | Benda et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5530221 | Benda et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534104 | Langer et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536467 | Reichle et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5594652 | Penn | Jan 1997 | A |
5647931 | Retallick et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658412 | Retallick et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665401 | Serbin et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5730925 | Mattes et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733497 | McAlea et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5753171 | Serbin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753274 | Wilkening et al. | May 1998 | A |
5786562 | Larson | Jul 1998 | A |
5817206 | McAlea et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832415 | Wilkening | Nov 1998 | A |
5846370 | O'Connor | Dec 1998 | A |
5876550 | Feygin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5876767 | Mattes et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897825 | Fruth et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904889 | Serbin et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904890 | Lohner et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908569 | Wilkening et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5934343 | Gaylo | Aug 1999 | A |
6007318 | Russell | Dec 1999 | A |
6042774 | Wilkening et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066285 | Kumar | May 2000 | A |
6085122 | Manning | Jun 2000 | A |
6136257 | Graf et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151345 | Gray | Nov 2000 | A |
6155331 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169605 | Penn | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6213168 | Gaylo | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6425281 | Sheriff et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6483596 | Philippi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6554600 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6596224 | Sachs | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600129 | Shen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6617546 | Manetsberger et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6672343 | Perret et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6677554 | Darrah et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6694207 | Darrah et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6764636 | Allanic | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6814926 | Geving et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815636 | Chung et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823928 | Sercombe et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824714 | Turck et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6848494 | Newell et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858816 | Manetsberger et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6930278 | Chung | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6932935 | Oberhofer et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7521652 | Chung et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997232 | Sercombe et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7036550 | Schaffer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7153463 | Leuterer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7261542 | Hickerson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7296599 | Cox | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297304 | Swanson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7357629 | Weiskopf et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7419632 | Keller | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7464733 | Cox | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7569174 | Ruatta et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7601422 | Gersch et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7614866 | Sperry et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628600 | Perret | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647107 | Perret et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7661948 | Perret et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665979 | Heugel | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7686005 | Adams | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7713048 | Perret et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740683 | Thorsson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748971 | Hochsmann | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7790096 | Merot et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7807947 | Partannen et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7820241 | Perret et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7837458 | Perret et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7847057 | Muller et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850885 | Philippi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7887316 | Cox | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7891095 | Jonsson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7931462 | Mattes | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7946840 | Perret et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7976302 | Halder et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8031384 | Perret et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8032479 | Dimter et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8073315 | Philippi | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8075814 | Fruth et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083513 | Montero-Escuder et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8119053 | Bedal et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8124192 | Paasche et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8137739 | Philippi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8172562 | Mattes | May 2012 | B2 |
8186990 | Perret et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8299208 | Muller et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8260447 | Mattes et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8303886 | Philippi | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313087 | Hesse et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317508 | Bokodi et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8366432 | Perret et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8414281 | Schleiss et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8420001 | Leuterer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8501075 | Philippi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8525071 | Lueterer | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8794263 | Scott et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8877874 | Paternoster | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20010050448 | Kubo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020090313 | Wang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104973 | Kerekes | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030201255 | Manetsberger | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040005182 | Gaylo | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012112 | Davidson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040061260 | Heugel | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040200816 | Chung | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050207931 | Hesse et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242473 | Newell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263933 | Welch, IV | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050263934 | Chung | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060214335 | Cox | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215246 | Kerekes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060219315 | Cox | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070057412 | Weiskofp et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063372 | Nielsen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087071 | Devos | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070267784 | Greiner | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070298182 | Hans et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080006958 | Davidson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036117 | Hickerson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080122141 | Bedal et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131539 | Perret | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152910 | Hesse et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080169589 | Sperry | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181977 | Sperry | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080190905 | Heinlein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080211132 | Feenstra | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090025638 | Inoue | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090045553 | Weidinger et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090047165 | Syvanen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090152771 | Philippi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090223944 | Sukhman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090266803 | Perret et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090283109 | Moussa | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090283119 | Moussa | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291308 | Pfister | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295042 | Pfister et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321998 | Gersch et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100044547 | Higashi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100140550 | Keller et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100155985 | McAlea et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100264302 | Philippi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100270713 | Frangov et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110122381 | Hickerson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133367 | Weidinger et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110165340 | Baumann | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110168091 | Baumann et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110174552 | Ahmed | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110221099 | Oberhofer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237731 | Paternoster | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110278773 | Bokodi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293771 | Oberhofer et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120045617 | Yasukochi | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120070666 | Gersch et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120090734 | Heinlein | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120107438 | Bokodi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120107496 | Thoma | May 2012 | A1 |
20120164322 | Teulet | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120192718 | Sukhman et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120267813 | Perret et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130000553 | Hoechsmann et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130064707 | Matsui | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130171019 | Gessler et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130330470 | Gersch et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140178588 | Swanson | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140265045 | Cullen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287080 | Scott et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140329953 | Paternoster | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140363585 | Pialot | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150298394 | Sheinman | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1135732 | Nov 1996 | CN |
4400523 | Jul 1995 | DE |
10360094 | Sep 2005 | DE |
1700686 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1704989 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1771267 | Apr 2007 | EP |
8502703 | Mar 1996 | JP |
9507882 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2001038812 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-334581 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2003-245981 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-306612 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006-248231 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2011-202165 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012-501828 | Jan 2012 | JP |
9511100 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9534468 | Dec 1995 | WO |
0181031 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2004056512 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2007-147221 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2010061174 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010095987 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for Application No. EP 05007528.2, Date of Completion of Search Sep. 16, 2005 (3 pages). |
European Search Report for Application No. EP 05007626.4, Date of Completion of Search Sep. 16, 2005 (3 pages). |
German Examination Report for Application No. DE 102005015985.0, dated Jan. 31, 2006 (4 pages—no English translation). |
German Examination Report for Application No. DE 102005015986.0, dated Feb. 2, 2006 (4 pages—no English translation). |
European Examination Report for Application No. EP 05007528.2, dated Dec. 12, 2006 (4 pages). |
European Examination Report for Application No. EP 05007528.2, dated Nov. 7, 2007 (3 pages). |
European Examination Report for Application No. EP 05007626.4, dated Aug. 11, 2006 (5 pages). |
Japanese Office Action for Counterpart Japanese Application No. JP 2005-155059, dated Jan. 22, 2008 (2 pages). |
Japanese Office Action for Application No. JP 2005-155060, dated Jan. 30, 2008 (2 pages). |
Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,289. |
Office Action mailed Jan. 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,303. |
PCT Partial International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Oct. 15, 2014 (6 pages). |
PCT International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028671 mailed Sep. 3, 2014 (6 pages). |
PCT Written Opinion for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028671 mailed Sep. 3, 2014 (8 pages). |
PCT International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Jan. 5, 2015 (8 pages). |
PCT Written Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Jan. 5, 2015 (10 pages). |
PCT Preliminary International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028671 mailed Sep. 24, 2015 (2 pages). |
PCT Written Opinion for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028671 mailed Sep. 24, 2015 (8 pages). |
PCT Preliminary International Search Report for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Sep. 24, 2015 (2 pages). |
PCT Written Opinion for the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2014/028621 mailed Sep. 24, 2015 (10 pages). |
English translation of Chinese First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026835.2 dated Jul. 4, 2016 (11 pages). |
English translation of Japan's First Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2106-502848 dated Aug. 16, 2016 (5 pages). |
English translation of Chinese First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026842.2 dated Jan. 3, 2017 (15 pages). |
English translation of Chinese Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480026842.2 dated Nov. 9, 2017 (6 pages). |
European Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 19712241.2 dated Aug. 27, 2019 (9 pages). |
European Patent Communication for European Application No. 22164716.7 dated Jul. 21, 2023 (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220324173 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61793870 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15265998 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 17846413 | US | |
Parent | 14212770 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15265998 | US |