Not applicable.
This invention relates to improving dimensional tolerances in powder metal (PM) components, and in particular to accurately sizing the outer diameter (OD) of a cylindrical PM component such as a valve seat or valve guide.
Valve seat inserts are typically installed in aluminum cylinder heads with an interference fit to seal off the combustion chamber from the cylinder head on the backside of the valve, and protect the aluminum cylinder head from damage by the valve seating directly against it. The valve seat must be wear and corrosion resistant at high temperatures, and able to conduct heat away from the valve to be absorbed by the cylinder head. Valve guides, which are also installed in the head with an interference fit, guide the stem part of the valve and so also must be wear resistant, and must be able to conduct heat from the stem to the cylinder head.
Cast iron, brass alloys and sintered powder metal have been used for valve seats. Sintered powder metal finds application to the most severe service, because of its excellent wear, corrosion and heat resistance, and thermal conductivity. However, the components must be made to extremely tight tolerances to achieve a suitable interference fit, and therefore have required machining to remove material from the OD and make the part round and of the accurate diameter. To permit efficient machining, the powder metal alloy of the valve seat or guide has sometimes been formulated to be more machinable, however, at the expense of wear and heat resistance. Even if machinable, it still required machining, which requires additional manufacturing processes and tooling costs.
The present invention provides a component and method of making it that enables using a relatively wear and heat resistant powder metal alloy while still providing good accuracy in size and roundness. In the invention, ribs are formed into the OD of the component during compaction, the component is sintered and then coined to size and shape.
In a preferred form, the ribs are axial ribs, like splines, and may or may not run for the length of the component.
If the ribs are on the outermost diameter of the component or the component is of a single OD, the component can be forced through a die that deforms the ribs permanently to create an effective diameter of the desired size and round shape, defined by the peaks of the ribs. Ideally, no subsequent machining to resize or reshape the effective diameter is required.
The coined ribs must be short enough so as not to affect the sealing between the valve seat and the cylinder head, so as not to provide a leak path from the combustion chamber.
This design also permits lateral flow of the aluminum alloy material of the cylinder head into the spaces between the ribs, and deformation of the cylinder head by the ribs to securely lock into place the component using production line press-in forces.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention will appear in the detailed description which follows. In the description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which illustrate a preferred embodiment of the invention.
A typical microstructure of a typical valve seat is shown in
Referring to
The ribs 30 can be sized to reduce the variation, i.e., the OD tolerance, of the OD and the variation in the OD roundness without requiring machining by plastically deforming them. Optimally, for rings that are basically straight wall such as valve guides and some valve seats, the coining process could be a high-speed pass through a bore in a die, the bore tapering to produce an OD on the part of the correct size and shape. These features provide a lower cost operation than machining for tolerances of less than 0.05 microns on the OD.
This method can be used on materials that are too hard for straight wall sizing such as valve seat materials that are susceptible to work hardening. Porosity would be collapsed along with some material plastic deformation, which provides a means for OD tolerance improvement on the outer OD. When press fit into a lower strength or higher ductility material, material will swage into any recessions, i.e., differences in OD size, remaining in the OD, providing locking and/or pressure tightness. This is especially important for valve seats with leakage concerns. The most critical sealing surface in the valve train assembly is between the face of the valve and its seat in the cylinder head when the valve is closed. Leakage between these surfaces reduces engine compression and power and can lead to valve burning. Without work hardening the ID faces, machinability is not impaired. Radial location and number of the splines can vary based on the press fit force and/or sealing requirements. These can typically number between 10 and 72 splines, typically evenly spaced around the OD.
Additionally, the invention reduces overall press fit force due to a reduction in the surface area contact or allow for a greater tolerance for a press fit at a set force.
The invention can also be applied to valve seats that have a stepped outer diameter, as shown in the valve seat 50 in
A preferred embodiment of the invention has been described in considerable detail. Many modifications and variations to the preferred embodiment described will be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art. Therefore, the invention should not be limited to the embodiment described.
This claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/943,737 filed Jun. 13, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/066897 | 6/13/2008 | WO | 00 | 6/16/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/157340 | 12/24/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2153397 | Sandler | Apr 1939 | A |
2198654 | Calkins et al. | Apr 1940 | A |
2331909 | Hensel et al. | Oct 1943 | A |
2975677 | Kelly, Jr. | Mar 1961 | A |
2999704 | Haller et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3152205 | Sinkler | Oct 1964 | A |
3445148 | Grad et al. | May 1969 | A |
3678557 | Howard | Jul 1972 | A |
3842646 | Kuhn | Oct 1974 | A |
4111031 | Vennemeyer et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4429018 | Stuemky | Jan 1984 | A |
4599110 | Köhler et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4907330 | Akao et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5094268 | Morel et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5326079 | Ferrando et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5988591 | Akimoto et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6151941 | Woolf et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6164168 | Anderson | Dec 2000 | A |
6168754 | Woolf et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6401562 | De' Stefani | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422755 | Cadle et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
20040177719 | Kosco | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070283778 | Ichikawa et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20100178190 | Colombo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120132160 | Malen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0014285 | Aug 1980 | EP |
2848245 | Jun 2004 | FR |
62-010244 | Jan 1987 | JP |
7224623 | Aug 1995 | JP |
10280099 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2003-041302 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004-82169 | Mar 2004 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion Corresponding to PCT/US08/066897 under date of mailing of Dec. 17, 2008. |
European Patent Office; Supplementary European Search Report for corresponding European Application No. 08771001.8-2311; Dated May 8, 2011. |
Japanese Patent Office; Notification of Reasons for Rejection (Non-final) for corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-512382 with translation; Mar. 12, 2013; 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110143158 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60943737 | Jun 2007 | US |