This invention relates generally to the field of designing and supplying DC power internally or externally in a device such as where low frequency AC ripple may be present. It has particular application to the technical field of power factor correction circuitry and to circuitry for solar power, specifically, methods and apparatus for converting electrical power from some type of solar energy source to make it available for use in a variety of applications. In the field of solar power it can be particularly useful in providing methods and apparatus for grid- or electrical power network-tied photovoltaic (PV) converters such as in large solar arrays as well as in residential or low to moderate power installations.
The use of electrolytic capacitors in DC power electronics has been pervasive since early radio and television days. They provide the necessary function of smoothing voltage while conducting widely varying current. Electrically this may be achieved by having a large capacitance value. Chemically this large capacitance is accomplished by having an ionic conducting liquid as one of its plates. By nature these capacitors may dry out or have other issues causing short lifetimes compared to other commonly used power conversion components. The common approach to achieve the desired lifetimes for power conversion equipment is to provide huge operational margins so as not to overly stress the electrolytic capacitor. This only provides marginal improvement. This invention discloses an electrical circuit that may be useful in a wide variety of applications and which achieves the desirable benefit of smoothing while experiencing AC current ripple without the use of any short lifetime components. This circuit may use switchmode power conversion technology to also maintain low losses.
It can be helpful to understand the need for this invention in the context of a particular application, such as a solar power system or power factor correction circuitry as is often used internally in many varying devices. In merely an exemplary context of photovoltaic (PV) systems, many common PV converters may have typical lifetime limits of about five years or so. Such a lifetime may be inconsistent with the fact that PV panels or solar panels can in some instances need to be viewed from the perspective of generating their electricity savings for payback of initial investment over longer periods. The present invention provides systems that may in some embodiments address the lifetime limits for many current PV converters. It may provide systems that extend the lifetime of a grid tied PV converter for single phase power installation to lifetimes of even several decades.
At the current time the use of PV panels to generate electricity may be in a period of rapid growth. The cost of solar power may even be decreasing and many factors appear to limit the growth of non-renewable energy sources. Today there are both large scale systems and small scale systems being deployed. For the large systems power is often supplied in three-phase connections which may not require large amounts of energy storage per cycle. For smaller installations like residential, single phase power is frequently delivered. In a typical system, one or many PV panels may be connected to a grid-tied converter which may take the steady power from the PV panel, perhaps at its maximum power point, and may then transform it to AC power suitable to back-feeding the grid or other electrical power network. For single phase, power delivery energy storage may be required every cycle. Today this energy storage often accomplished with short lived components—electrolytic capacitors. The present invention overcomes this limitation in a manner that can practically increase the life of the PV converter componentry.
As mentioned with respect to the field of invention, the invention includes a variety of aspects, which may be combined in different ways. The following descriptions are provided to list elements and describe some of the embodiments of the present invention. These elements are listed with initial embodiments, however it should be understood that they may be combined in any manner and in any number to create additional embodiments. The variously described examples and preferred embodiments should not be construed to limit the present invention to only the explicitly described systems, techniques, and applications. Further, this description should be understood to support and encompass descriptions and claims of all the various embodiments, systems, techniques, methods, devices, and applications with any number of the disclosed elements, with each element alone, and also with any and all various permutations and combinations of all elements in this or any subsequent application.
In various embodiments, the present invention discloses achievements, systems, and different initial exemplary applications through which one may achieve some of the goals of the present invention. Systems provide for replacement components and enhanced power control, among other aspects. Through a variety of different aspects, the invention provides more reliability to a variety of circuitries. The invention provides: 1) a replacement system approach, 2) highly reliable switch-mode topologies, 3) a system that provides an altered interim internal signal, 4) unique control techniques that provide long lived devices, 5) unique switching designs and circuits, and 6) devices and circuit inserts that can be broadly applied. Each of these may exist independently of any other and are discussed below.
In general, it is possible to using switchmode or other power conversion technology with the new circuitry systems to emulate the high capacitance of an electrolytic capacitor for many operational requirements. These circuits can use a longer life lower value capacitor which could be a film capacitor for example that could be used in power factor correction circuitry, in solar power converters, or the like. In this patent a film capacitor is used as an example of any non-electrolytic capacitor that has a longer life. In certain embodiments, a switchmode power conversion circuit can operate in such a way that the voltage on the film capacitor varies over a large range to affect the same cycle-by-cycle energy storage while at the same time maintaining a relatively constant voltage across designated terminals. Although there are applications where electrolytic capacitors are used for one-time needs, like hold-up, where the circuit of the invention may not be necessary, in many applications long life is desired. The fundamental application of the circuit of the invention is where lower frequency cycle-by-cycle energy storage or smoothing is desired. For example, the output capacitor of a power factor correction circuit could be replaced with this circuit. Another example is the energy storage capacitor used in solar inverters. Another example is the voltage smoothing occurring in an internal or external power supply in general.
In many solar power applications, a single phase grid-tied converter can be used to supply power to the grid, perhaps at a frequency of two times the grid frequency. For example with a 60 Hz grid, the output power may flow in pulses at a frequency of 120 Hz. The solar panel at the same time may only produce its maximum power at a steady rate. The converter then may be configured to retrieve the power from the PV panel at a steady rate (perhaps at a maximum power point), store the energy, and output the energy at either a pulsing rate, as smoothed DC, or as inverted AC. Internally the frequency of pulsing may be low and the amount of energy stored may be high (on the order of one joule per 100 watts of converter power). Some configurations may, and commonly do, use one type of electrical element as an inexpensive component for this type of energy storage and smoothing, an electrolytic capacitor. Use of electrolytic capacitors may involve many commonly available power conversion topologies and circuits. These may be well developed and are often deployed in current grid-tied power converter systems. In fact, electrolytic capacitors are in such widespread use that they are deployed in much less critical applications simply from common practice. Many current systems utilize a number of these electrolytic capacitors. For example, some current designs may have over 30 electrolytic capacitors each. It is a goal of some embodiments of the present invention to extend lifetime and perhaps significantly avoid lifetime limitations experienced by systems that utilize such topologies. Although there are applications where long life may not be necessary (perhaps such as some computer systems where a lifetime of five years is often adequate because the computer may be obsolete in this same time period) many applications do last long and long life remains necessary. A grid-tied PV system is but one example of a system where the initial installation and product cost can be high enough, and the economics of using such a system may be such that payback needs to be considered as power is generated or as the system or device is used over a long period of time. It may even involve long term financing perhaps with a term of 30 to 40 years. If the expectation is that the converter must be replaced every five or perhaps seven years, then there is an undesirable consequence that the converter must be replaced about four or more times over the life of the system or the investment.
Accordingly, it is an object of embodiments of the invention to provide a means and apparatus to utilize energy (such as, but not limited to, a PV panel, an internal DC or the like) and to supply desired power in a manner that provides economical, long lived, reliable components.
As mentioned above, the invention discloses a variety of aspects that may be considered independently or in combination with others. Although shown in initial applications such as a solar power system or as an accessory for a device with factor correction, other applications can, of course, exist. Initial understandings can begin with understanding an embodiment as applied to a solar energy power system. Such a system may combine any of the following concepts and circuits including: an inverter, a converter, energy storage, switches, a controller and changeable functional control components. Aspects may include a very high efficiency photovoltaic converter. Initial benefits are discussed individually and in combination in the following discussion as well as how each represents a general group of designs rather than just those initially disclosed.
In prior art and common use today the electrolytic capacitor is often a large capacitance value element. The large value may exist from the need to carry large current. It may also be selected to minimize the voltage ripple. In solar power applications as but one example, a typical value for more common electrolytic capacitors may be 3 MF at 450 volts for a 4 kW power converter. In sharp contrast, in embodiments of the invention a film capacitor may be employed. Such a film capacitor may be much less capacitance, on the order of 50 uF—one tenth or even one hundredth or more times smaller. This film capacitor may have very large ripple voltage as well. To compare, the electrolytic capacitor ripple may be only a few volts. The film capacitor may have as much as hundreds of volts of ripple, or more. This large ripple may not cause any issue for the film capacitor; it may, however, involve significant changes in the power conversion topology and/or techniques.
Also included may be an inductive element L1 (19) and perhaps a film capacitor (16) that operate in a fashion similar to a boost converter, raising the voltage substantially on the film capacitor (16) for the duration current flows into the capacitor path (20) circuit. This may occur by including an alternate path controller (21) to operate the alternative path switch circuitry (24) such as the first and second switch elements (17) and (18) and alternately permit action in the capacitor path (20) or the alternative circuitry path (26). As shown, the capacitor path (20) or the alternative circuitry path (26) may be combined such as on a common lead (27). As in known boost converters, the duty cycle of switch S2 (18) may determine the boost current and the voltage being forced on capacitor (16). Switch S1 (17) could be thought of simply as a diode during this time. Thus the alternate path controller (21) may serve as a boost controller (22). Also at this time a control circuit configured as the more general aspect of an alternate path controller (21) may maintain the positive terminal voltage substantially constant. When the current into the positive terminal reverses, the function of the circuit whereby the switches S1 (17), S2 (18), inductor L1 (19), and capacitor C1 (16) may form a buck converter reducing the voltage across the film capacitor. Thus the alternate path controller (21) may also serve as a buck controller (23). At this time the duty cycle of switch S1 determines the ratio of the voltage across capacitor C1 (16) to the positive terminal voltage. Switch S2 (18) now can be thought of as a simple diode. The controller during this time may continue to maintain substantially constant voltage on the positive input terminal. The energy storage in terms of joules stored per cycle must of course be maintained. The film or other type of capacitor (16) may have a much lower capacitance value and thus may store this energy by operating over a large voltage swing, cycle-by-cycle. The inductive element L1 (19) may be chosen to buffer the peak current through the switches S1 and S2 (17) and (18). The switching frequency of S1 and S2 may be chosen to be large compared to the low frequency current impressed across the electrolytic. For example if the electrolytic capacitor was smoothing a 120 Hz ripple, a switching frequency of 50 kHz or higher may be used. In this case the energy stored in the inductive element (19) L1 may be small enough to be ignored in analyzing this circuit. As may be appreciated from
The above embodiments are examples that illustrate how the invention can be used to replace or to design for a more long lasting capacitor. For example, an electrolytic capacitor operating at a nominal 400 volts and having a few volts of ripple superimposed on the 400 volts may be replaced with the circuit of the invention where the voltage on a smaller valued film capacitor may swing from 400 volts to 800 volts every cycle. While this may seem excessive, the film capacitor may not be degraded by this operation for decades where the electrolytic capacitor may only last a few years. The primary benefit of this circuit is realized in applications where long life expectancy is desired.
As may be appreciated, the capacitor (16) may act to smooth the ripple on the unsmoothed DC signal. The result may be a smoothed substantially constant DC voltage and this may be accomplished by operating the alternative path controller (21) as a smoothed signal maintenance controller. Depending on the parameters of operation, it may cause capacitive energy storage that has a maximum operative capacitor energy during operation. The element or elements operative store energy and operatively store a maximum operative capacitive energy, and this can be handled in a more optimal manner. This can be accomplished internally or it may be the external output of a system. By boosting the voltage, a smaller capacitor and an enhanced circuitry component can be used. Thus, the energy storage circuitry need not be a life limiting aspect for a wide variety of circuitries and devices. Since the energy stored in a capacitor can be expressed as ½CV2, and since the squared term—voltage excursion—is boosted, the replacement capacitor may considerable smaller. Where a particular sized, usually electrolytic, capacitor was once used, a replacement capacitor of one-tenth, one-twentieth, one-fiftieth, one-hundredth, or even more the size of the equivalent electrolytic capacitor can now be used. In absolute terms, for many applications, a replacement or newly designed in capacitor of 5 μF, 10 μF, 50 μF, 100 μF, or 500 μF or the like may now be used.
As may be appreciated from the fact that the energy stored (½CV2) increases as the square of the voltage impressed upon the capacitor, a large voltage variation can be very beneficial. Embodiments act to create a large voltage variation that can be two, five, ten, fifty, or even more times the initial ripple amount. In general, embodiments may include interim signal circuitry (28) as part of the enhanced DC-DC power converter (4), as part of the capacitor substitution circuitry (14) or otherwise. This interim signal circuitry (28) may be almost transparent in that it may be internal and may act only as necessary to cause the desired effect on the capacitor (16). It may create the signal enhancement needed to permit a smaller capacitor to be used by boost and buck controlling operation or by utilizing a boost controller (22) and a buck controller (23) or the like.
An aspect that can facilitate the desired enhancement can be the aspect of utilizing switchmode circuitry such as shown. Semiconductor switches can be controlled in an open and closed, or on and off, state very easily. Thus, alternative switch circuitry that controls one of two or so alternative paths can be easily achieved. The capacitor path (20) or the alternative circuitry path (26) can be selected merely by alternately switching in a manner that an alternative output occurs such as by alternative output switching as shown. In some embodiments, it can be seen that the alternative circuitry path (26) may be configured across the capacitor and may itself be a substantially energy storage free circuitry path such as shown by a plain wire connection where inherent inductances and capacitances can be ignored in the circuitry design or effects.
In considering a switchmode nature of operational control, it can be understood that operating the alternative switch circuitry (24) or the alternative path controller (21) may be controlled or configured to achieve duty cycle switching. By duty cycle controlling operation changes in the output or the operation can be achieved by simply changing the duty cycle between the two alternative paths. Thus the alternative path controller (21) may be configured or programmed to serve as a switch duty cycle controller (32). One way in which this can be easily controlled can be by providing a feedback sensor (33). This feedback sensor (33) may act to sense any parameter, however, the output voltage may be a very direct parameter. The feedback sensor (33) may serve as an output voltage feedback sensor and may thus achieve control according to the result desired, likely an average voltage for the smoothed DC output (6). All of this may be easily accomplished by simply varying the duty cycle of operation and by switch duty cycle controlling operation. As can be easily appreciated from the simplified design shown in
In considering the effects of the inductive element (19), it can be appreciated that this aspect may merely be designed to serve to limit the current to which the first and second switch element (17) and (18) may be subjected. It may thus serve as a switch current limit inductor. As such, its energy may be significantly less that the energy stored in the capacitor (16). For example, considering the inductive energy storage as having a maximum operative inductor energy that is the amount of energy to which the inductive element (19) is subjected throughout a particular mode of normal operation or operative stored, it can be understood that this inductive energy storage may be considerably smaller that the energy stored in the capacitor (16). The capacitor's energy may be about two, five, or even about ten or more times as big as said maximum operative inductor energy.
In considering the size of the inductive element (19), the speed with which alternate switching between alternative paths may occur can have significant effects. Designs may have the alternative path controller (21) serve as a switch frequency controller (34). As mentioned above, the frequency of alternative switching may be considerably higher than that of a superimposed ripple. Thus the switch frequency controller (34) may be configured as a high frequency switch controller. Using the previous example of a 120 Hz ripple and a 50 kHz controller, it can be appreciated that the switch frequency can be at least about 400 times as fast. High frequency switch controllers at least about one hundred, five hundred, and even a thousand times the underlying predominant frequency of a superimposed ripple, AC component, or the like can be included. This level of switch frequency controlling operation can serve to reduce the size of the inductive element (19). As discussed below it can also reduce the size and energy of a bypass capacitor, and it can decrease the size of the ripple, as may each be desired for certain applications. Further, high frequency switch-mode converting can be easily achieved and thus designs can include a high frequency switch-mode controller that may even be operated at a rate one thousand times a predominant ripple frequency switch controller's rate.
With respect to ripple, the alternative path controller (21) can serve as a low ripple controller (40). If internal, the invention can provide an internal low ripple DC voltage to other circuitry. Perhaps even by merely controlling the output voltage in this manner, the alternative path controller (21) can achieve low ripple controlling. For any remaining ripple, a full circuit component bypass capacitor (35) can also be included as shown in several of the figures. This bypass capacitor (35) can smooth the irregularities of power caused at the high frequency switch operational level and can thus be considered a high frequency operative energy storage bypass capacitor. It can serve to store high frequency energy and can thus be sized as a greater than high frequency cycle-by-cycle energy storage bypass capacitor. Since this frequency can be considerably higher than the superimposed original ripple, the bypass capacitor (35) can be a relatively small capacitor.
In creating designs, there may be operational limits to consider for the embodiment of the circuit shown in
As mentioned initially, many alternative embodiments according to the invention are possible.
Considering
As shown in
As shown in
Returning to the solar power implementation shown schematically in
As can be seen this may be a perhaps radical departure from some conventional designs. It may, however, result in a long life inverter.
If one begins with the condition that the energy storage capacitor operates with high voltage swings, other topologies or compromises may be more suitable. In some embodiments, it may be possible that isolation could be eliminated entirely. Isolation may be evaluated in the designs of some embodiments from perspectives that recognize the various reasons for it (including regulatory and safety requirements.) However, with a system that involves variable voltage as established in some embodiments of the invention, a designer may opt to not include isolation.
The circuit of
In embodiments, the output stage may also have another function. It may regulate the voltage on C9 to stay within the designed voltage range (perhaps such as 400 to 550 volts) by pulling power from the capacitor and supplying the grid. This may occur while the input stage is supplying steady power at MPP for the solar panels. There may also be protection circuits. If the output stage for example cannot pull enough power from C9 to keep its voltage below 550 volts, the input stage may be configured to limit the input power. This could occur if the grid had to be disconnected for example.
The circuit of
As another example, consider a more detailed example where an electrolytic capacitor is used in a PFC or a solar inverter circuit for the cycle by cycle voltage smoothing and energy storage. For this example consider the use of a 390 microfarad electrolytic capacitor operating at 400 VDC minimum nominal and having 1.4 amperes RMS ripple current flowing through it at a frequency of 120 Hz. The resultant voltage ripple would be 4.68 volts RMS or a peak to peak ripple of 13.4 volts. For simple comparison the minimum voltage of 400 volts is maintained. The voltage swing on this capacitor then swings from 400 volts to 413.4 volts. The energy stored at 413.4 volts is 33.325 joules. The energy stored at 400 volts is 31.2 joules. So during one half cycle the electrolytic capacitor stores an additional 2.125 joules. Now to compare the circuit of invention, a 20 uF film capacitor with a voltage rating of 800 volts will be used. As mentioned earlier the energy stored in L1 is small. This means all the cycle by cycle energy must now be stored in the film cap. At 400 volts the 20 uF capacitor stores 1.6 joules. Adding 2.125 joules gives 3.727 joules which the film cap must store at peak voltage. Solving for v gives 610 volts. So for this example the voltage on the film capacitor swings from 400 volts to 610 volts cycle by cycle. The same energy is stored. It may be noted by some that while if the current through the electrolytic capacitor is sinusoidal the voltage swing is also substantially sinusoidal. But the voltage on the film capacitor is not. This buck or boost action of the switching power conversion must preserve the energy storage. As energy storage changes with voltage squared on a capacitor, the resultant transfer function must be nonlinear. The resultant voltage waveform on the film capacitor is more egg-shaped or rounded on the top.
The control circuitry and transistor driver circuitry for this invention are widely known methods to achieve the described functions. The invention is embodied in the fundamental power conversion aspects and the concomitant value of replacing an electrolytic capacitor with a non-electrolytic. The object of the control circuit is to preserve low voltage on the connection where the electrolytic capacitor would be. Also not mentioned is a small bypass capacitor which may also be necessary to minimize high frequency ripple. While it may be an object to completely eliminate the ripple at this junction, it is possible to emulate another aspect of the electrolytic capacitor—that is, having a small ripple at the 120 Hz frequency. This is easily achieved with the control circuit, perhaps even as simply as by reducing the gain of a control loop.
As can be easily understood from the foregoing, the basic concepts of the present invention may be embodied in a variety of ways. It involves both solar power generation techniques as well as devices to accomplish the appropriate power generation. In this application, the power generation techniques are disclosed as part of the results shown to be achieved by the various circuits and devices described and as steps which are inherent to utilization. They are simply the natural result of utilizing the devices and circuits as intended and described. In addition, while some circuits are disclosed, it should be understood that these not only accomplish certain methods but also can be varied in a number of ways. Importantly, as to all of the foregoing, all of these facets should be understood to be encompassed by this disclosure.
The discussion included in this application is intended to serve as a basic description. The reader should be aware that the specific discussion may not explicitly describe all embodiments possible; many alternatives are implicit. It also may not fully explain the generic nature of the invention and may not explicitly show how each feature or element can actually be representative of a broader function or of a great variety of alternative or equivalent elements. Again, these are implicitly included in this disclosure. Where the invention is described in device-oriented terminology, each element of the device implicitly performs a function. Apparatus claims may not only be included for the devices and circuits described, but also method or process claims may be included to address the functions the invention and each element performs. Neither the description nor the terminology is intended to limit the scope of the claims that will be included in any subsequent patent application.
It should also be understood that a variety of changes may be made without departing from the essence of the invention. Such changes are also implicitly included in the description. They still fall within the scope of this invention. A broad disclosure encompassing both the explicit embodiment(s) shown, the great variety of implicit alternative embodiments, and the broad methods or processes and the like are encompassed by this disclosure and may be relied upon when drafting the claims for any subsequent patent application. It should be understood that such language changes and broader or more detailed claiming may be accomplished at a later date. With this understanding, the reader should be aware that this disclosure is to be understood to support any subsequently filed patent application that may seek examination of as broad a base of claims as deemed within the applicant's right and may be designed to yield a patent covering numerous aspects of the invention both independently and as an overall system.
Further, each of the various elements of the invention and claims may also be achieved in a variety of manners. Additionally, when used or implied, an element is to be understood as encompassing individual as well as plural structures that may or may not be physically connected. This disclosure should be understood to encompass each such variation, be it a variation of an embodiment of any apparatus embodiment, a method or process embodiment, or even merely a variation of any element of these. Particularly, it should be understood that as the disclosure relates to elements of the invention, the words for each element may be expressed by equivalent apparatus terms or method terms—even if only the function or result is the same. Such equivalent, broader, or even more generic terms should be considered to be encompassed in the description of each element or action. Such terms can be substituted where desired to make explicit the implicitly broad coverage to which this invention is entitled. As but one example, it should be understood that all actions may be expressed as a means for taking that action or as an element which causes that action. Similarly, each physical element disclosed should be understood to encompass a disclosure of the action which that physical element facilitates. Regarding this last aspect, as but one example, the disclosure of a “converter” should be understood to encompass disclosure of the act of “converting”—whether explicitly discussed or not—and, conversely, were there effectively disclosure of the act of “converting”, such a disclosure should be understood to encompass disclosure of a “converter” and even a “means for converting” Such changes and alternative terms are to be understood to be explicitly included in the description.
Any patents, publications, or other references mentioned in this application for patent or its list of references are hereby incorporated by reference. Any priority case(s) claimed at any time by this or any subsequent application are hereby appended and hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, as to each term used it should be understood that unless its utilization in this application is inconsistent with a broadly supporting interpretation, common dictionary definitions should be understood as incorporated for each term and all definitions, alternative terms, and synonyms such as contained in the Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, second edition are hereby incorporated by reference. Finally, all references listed in the List of References other information statement filed with or included in the application are hereby appended and hereby incorporated by reference, however, as to each of the above, to the extent that such information or statements incorporated by reference might be considered inconsistent with the patenting of this/these invention(s) such statements are expressly not to be considered as made by the applicant(s).
Thus, the applicant(s) should be understood to have support to claim and make a statement of invention to at least: i) each of the power control devices as herein disclosed and described, ii) the related methods disclosed and described, iii) similar, equivalent, and even implicit variations of each of these devices and methods, iv) those alternative designs which accomplish each of the functions shown as are disclosed and described, v) those alternative designs and methods which accomplish each of the functions shown as are implicit to accomplish that which is disclosed and described, vi) each feature, component, and step shown as separate and independent inventions, vii) the applications enhanced by the various systems or components disclosed, viii) the resulting products produced by such systems or components, ix) each system, method, and element shown or described as now applied to any specific field or devices mentioned, x) methods and apparatuses substantially as described hereinbefore and with reference to any of the accompanying examples, xi) the various combinations and permutations of each of the elements disclosed, xii) each potentially dependent claim or concept as a dependency on each and every one of the independent claims or concepts presented, and xiii) all inventions described herein. In addition and as to computerized aspects and each aspect amenable to programming or other programmable electronic automation, the applicant(s) should be understood to have support to claim and make a statement of invention to at least: xiv) processes performed with the aid of or on a computer as described throughout the above discussion, xv) a programmable apparatus as described throughout the above discussion, xvi) a computer readable memory encoded with data to direct a computer comprising means or elements which function as described throughout the above discussion, xvii) a computer configured as herein disclosed and described, xviii) individual or combined subroutines and programs as herein disclosed and described, xix) the related methods disclosed and described, xx) similar, equivalent, and even implicit variations of each of these systems and methods, xxi) those alternative designs which accomplish each of the functions shown as are disclosed and described, xxii) those alternative designs and methods which accomplish each of the functions shown as are implicit to accomplish that which is disclosed and described, xxiii) each feature, component, and step shown as separate and independent inventions, and xxiv) the various combinations and permutations of each of the above.
With regard to claims whether now or later presented for examination, it should be understood that for practical reasons and so as to avoid great expansion of the examination burden, the applicant may at any time present only initial claims or perhaps only initial claims with only initial dependencies. The office and any third persons interested in potential scope of this or subsequent applications should understand that broader claims may be presented at a later date in this case, in a case claiming the benefit of this case, or in any continuation in spite of any preliminary amendments, other amendments, claim language, or arguments presented, thus throughout the pendency of any case there is no intention to disclaim or surrender any potential subject matter. Both the examiner and any person otherwise interested in existing or later potential coverage, or considering if there has at any time been any possibility of an indication of disclaimer or surrender of potential coverage, should be aware that in the absence of explicit statements, no such surrender or disclaimer is intended or should be considered as existing in this or any subsequent application. Limitations such as arose in Hakim v. Cannon Avent Group, PLC, 479 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir 2007), or the like are expressly not intended in this or any subsequent related matter.
In addition, support should be understood to exist to the degree required under new matter laws—including but not limited to European Patent Convention Article 123(2) and United States Patent Law 35 USC 132 or other such laws—to permit the addition of any of the various dependencies or other elements presented under one independent claim or concept as dependencies or elements under any other independent claim or concept. In drafting any claims at any time whether in this application or in any subsequent application, it should also be understood that the applicant has intended to capture as full and broad a scope of coverage as legally available. To the extent that insubstantial substitutes are made, to the extent that the applicant did not in fact draft any claim so as to literally encompass any particular embodiment, and to the extent otherwise applicable, the applicant should not be understood to have in any way intended to or actually relinquished such coverage as the applicant simply may not have been able to anticipate all eventualities; one skilled in the art, should not be reasonably expected to have drafted a claim that would have literally encompassed such alternative embodiments.
Further, if or when used, the use of the transitional phrase “comprising” is used to maintain the “open-end” claims herein, according to traditional claim interpretation. Thus, unless the context requires otherwise, it should be understood that the term “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, are intended to imply the inclusion of a stated element or step or group of elements or steps but not the exclusion of any other element or step or group of elements or steps. Such terms should be interpreted in their most expansive form so as to afford the applicant the broadest coverage legally permissible.
Finally, any claims set forth at any time are hereby incorporated by reference as part of this description of the invention, and the applicant expressly reserves the right to use all of or a portion of such incorporated content of such claims as additional description to support any of or all of the claims or any element or component thereof, and the applicant further expressly reserves the right to move any portion of or all of the incorporated content of such claims or any element or component thereof from the description into the claims or vice-versa as necessary to define the matter for which protection is sought by this application or by any subsequent continuation, division, or continuation-in-part application thereof, or to obtain any benefit of, reduction in fees pursuant to, or to comply with the patent laws, rules, or regulations of any country or treaty, and such content incorporated by reference shall survive during the entire pendency of this application including any subsequent continuation, division, or continuation-in-part application thereof or any reissue or extension thereon.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/738,068, filed Apr. 14, 2010, which is the United States National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2008/080794, Filed 22 Oct. 2008, and which claims benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/986,979 filed Nov. 9, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/982,053 filed Oct. 23, 2007, each hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3900943 | Sirti et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4127797 | Perper | Nov 1978 | A |
4168124 | Pizzi | Sep 1979 | A |
4218139 | Sheffield | Aug 1980 | A |
4222665 | Tacjozawa et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4249958 | Baudin et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4274044 | Barre | Jun 1981 | A |
4341607 | Tison | Jul 1982 | A |
4375662 | Baker | Mar 1983 | A |
4390940 | Corbefin et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4395675 | Toumani | Jul 1983 | A |
4404472 | Steigerwald | Sep 1983 | A |
4409537 | Harris | Oct 1983 | A |
4445030 | Carlson | Apr 1984 | A |
4445049 | Steigerwald | Apr 1984 | A |
4513167 | Brandstetter | Apr 1985 | A |
4528503 | Cole | Jul 1985 | A |
4580090 | Bailey et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4581716 | Kamiya | Apr 1986 | A |
4619863 | Taylor | Oct 1986 | A |
4626983 | Harada et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4649334 | Nakajima | Mar 1987 | A |
4725740 | Nakata | Feb 1988 | A |
4749982 | Rikuna et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4794909 | Elden | Jan 1989 | A |
4873480 | Lafferty | Oct 1989 | A |
4896034 | Kiriseko | Jan 1990 | A |
4899269 | Rouzies | Feb 1990 | A |
4922396 | Niggemeyer | May 1990 | A |
5027051 | Lafferty | Jun 1991 | A |
5028861 | Pace et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5179508 | Lange et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5270636 | Lafferty | Dec 1993 | A |
5401561 | Fisun et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402060 | Erisman | Mar 1995 | A |
5493155 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493204 | Caldwell | Feb 1996 | A |
5503260 | Riley | Apr 1996 | A |
5646502 | Johnson | Jul 1997 | A |
5648731 | Decker et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659465 | Flack et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669987 | Takehara et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5689242 | Sims et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5741370 | Hanoka | Apr 1998 | A |
5747967 | Muljadi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5782994 | Mori et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801519 | Midya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5896281 | Bingley | Apr 1999 | A |
5898585 | Sirichote et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923100 | Lukens et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932994 | Jo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6046401 | McCabe | Apr 2000 | A |
6081104 | Kern | Jun 2000 | A |
6124769 | Igarashi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6162986 | Shiotsuka | Dec 2000 | A |
6180868 | Yoshino et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181590 | Yamane et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191501 | Bos | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218605 | Daily et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218820 | D'Arrigo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219623 | Wills | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6262558 | Weinberg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278052 | Takehara et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281485 | Siri | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282104 | Kern | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6314007 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6331670 | Takehara et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6351400 | Lumsden | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6369462 | Siri | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6433522 | Siri | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433992 | Nakagawa et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6441896 | Field | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448489 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6493246 | Suzui et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6515215 | Mimura | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6545211 | Mimura | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545868 | Kledzik et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6593521 | Kobayashi | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6624350 | Nixon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6670721 | Lof et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6686533 | Raum et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6686727 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703555 | Takabayashi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6750391 | Bower et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6791024 | Toyomura | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804127 | Zhou | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6889122 | Perez | May 2005 | B2 |
6914418 | Sung | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6914420 | Crocker | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920055 | Zeng et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6952355 | Riggio et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958922 | Kazem | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6984965 | Vinciarelli | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984970 | Capel | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7019988 | Fung et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7046531 | Zocchi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7068017 | Willner et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072194 | Nayar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091707 | Cutler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092265 | Kernahan | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7158395 | Deng et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7193872 | Siri | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7227278 | Realmuto et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248946 | Bashaw et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7274975 | Miller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7333916 | Warfield et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339287 | Jepsen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7365661 | Thomas | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7471073 | Rettenwort et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7479774 | Wai et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7514900 | Sander et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7596008 | Iwata et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
D602432 | Moussa | Oct 2009 | S |
7602080 | Hadar et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7605498 | Ledenev et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7619200 | Seymour et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7619323 | Tan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7663342 | Kimball et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7719140 | Ledenev et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7768155 | Fornage | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786716 | Simburger et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7807919 | Powell | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7834580 | Haines | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843085 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7919953 | Porter et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7948221 | Watanabe et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962249 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8004116 | Ledenev et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8093756 | Porter et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106765 | Ackerson et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8242634 | Schatz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8304932 | Ledenev et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20010007522 | Nakagawa et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010032664 | Takehara et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020038200 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020195136 | Takabayashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030062078 | Mimura | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075211 | Makita et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030117822 | Stamenic et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040095020 | Kernahan et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100149 | Lai | May 2004 | A1 |
20040135560 | Kernahan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040159102 | Toyomura et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164557 | West | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040207366 | Sung | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211456 | Brown et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050002214 | Deng et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050068012 | Cutler | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105224 | Nishi | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109386 | Marshall | May 2005 | A1 |
20050116475 | Hibi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050121067 | Toyomura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162018 | Realmuto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169018 | Hatai et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050254191 | Bashaw et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060017327 | Siri et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060103360 | Cutler | May 2006 | A9 |
20060162772 | Presher et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171182 | Siri et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174939 | Matan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070024257 | Boldo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035975 | Dickerson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044837 | Simburger et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069520 | Schetters | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070111103 | Konishiike et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119718 | Gibson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133241 | Mumtaz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159866 | Siri | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165347 | Wendt et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171680 | Perreault et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070236187 | Wai et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080036440 | Garmer | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062724 | Feng et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097655 | Hadar et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101101 | Iwata et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111517 | Pfeifer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123375 | Beardsley | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136367 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143188 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144294 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147335 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150366 | Adest et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080164766 | Adest et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186004 | Williams | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080236648 | Klein et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080238195 | Shaver | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247201 | Perol | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257397 | Glaser et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090039852 | Fishelov et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090078300 | Ang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090114263 | Powell et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090120485 | Kikinis | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133736 | Powell et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140715 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090141522 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145480 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146505 | Powell et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146667 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146671 | Gazit | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090147554 | Adest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150005 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160258 | Allen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090206666 | Sella et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207543 | Boniface et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218887 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234692 | Powell et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237042 | Glovinski | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237043 | Glovinski | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090273241 | Gazit et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090283128 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090283129 | Foss | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284078 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284232 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284240 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284998 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100001587 | Casey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026097 | Avrutsky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100027297 | Avrutsky et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038968 | Ledenev et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078057 | Karg et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100085670 | Palaniswami et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117858 | Rozenboim | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118985 | Rozenboim | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127570 | Hadar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127571 | Hadar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132758 | Gilmore | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100139732 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100139734 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100139743 | Hadar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100195361 | Stem | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100229915 | Ledenev et al, | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246230 | Porter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253150 | Porter et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100308662 | Schatz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005567 | VanderSluis et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110067745 | Ledenev et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110095613 | Huang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110115300 | Chiang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127841 | Chiang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160930 | Batten et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175454 | Williams et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181251 | Porter et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193515 | Wu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110210611 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110316346 | Porter et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120175963 | Adest et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120223584 | Ledenev et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0677749 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0677749 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0824273 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0964415 | Dec 1999 | EP |
0964457 | Dec 1999 | EP |
0964457 | Dec 1999 | EP |
00978884 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0780750 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1291997 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1120895 | May 2004 | EP |
612859 | Nov 1948 | FR |
310362 | Sep 1929 | GB |
1231961 | Sep 1969 | GB |
5050197 | Nov 2005 | GB |
2415841 | Jan 2006 | GB |
2419968 | May 2006 | GB |
2421847 | Jul 2006 | GB |
2434490 | Jul 2007 | GB |
56042365 | Apr 1981 | JP |
60027964 | Feb 1985 | JP |
60148172 | Aug 1985 | JP |
62154121 | Sep 1987 | JP |
62-256156 | Nov 1987 | JP |
05003678 | Jan 1993 | JP |
06035555 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06141261 | May 1994 | JP |
07026849 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07222436 | Aug 1995 | JP |
07-302130 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08033347 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8046231 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08066050 | Mar 1996 | JP |
08181343 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08204220 | Aug 1996 | JP |
09097918 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9148613 | Jun 1997 | JP |
2000020150 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-174307 | Jun 2000 | JP |
20011086765 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002231578 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002231578 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2007104872 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007225625 | Jun 2007 | JP |
27058845 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007058843 | Aug 2007 | JP |
1020050071689 | Jul 2005 | KR |
1020060060825 | Jul 2006 | KR |
1020070036528 | Mar 2007 | KR |
1020080092747 | Oct 2008 | KR |
9003680 | Apr 1990 | WO |
02073785 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03036688 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004100344 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004100348 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004107543 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005027300 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005036725 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005076445 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006005125 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006013600 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006013600 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006048688 | May 2006 | WO |
2006048689 | May 2006 | WO |
2006048689 | May 2006 | WO |
2006071436 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006078685 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006117551 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006137948 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007007360 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007080429 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007142693 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008125915 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008125915 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008132551 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008132551 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008132553 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008142480 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008142480 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008142480 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2008069926 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009007782 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009007782 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009007782 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009051853 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009051854 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009051870 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009055474 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009059028 | May 2009 | WO |
2009059028 | May 2009 | WO |
2009064683 | May 2009 | WO |
2009064683 | May 2009 | WO |
2009072075 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072075 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072075 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072076 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072076 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009072077 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009073867 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009073868 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009075985 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009075985 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009114341 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009114341 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118682 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009118683 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009136358 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009136358 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140536 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140536 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140539 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140539 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140543 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140543 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140551 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009140551 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010002960 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010014116 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010062410 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010062662 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010062662 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010065043 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010120315 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011049985 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2012100263 | Jul 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
http://www.solarsentry.com; Protecting Your Solar Investment, 2005, Solar Sentry Corp. |
Bower, et al. “Innovative PV Micro-Inverter Topology Eliminates Electrolytic Capacitors for Longer Lifetime,” 1-4244-0016-3-06 IEEE p. 2038. |
Solar Sentry Corp., Protecting Solar Investment “Solar Sentry's Competitive Advantage”, 4 pages estimated as Oct. 2008. |
Dallas Semiconductor; Battery I.D. chip from Dallas Semiconductor monitors and reports battery pack temperature, Bnet World Network, Jul. 10, 1995. |
deHaan, S.W.H., et al; Test results of a 130W AC module, a modular solar AC power station, Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 1994; Conference Record of the 24th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Dec. 5-91994; 1994 IEEE First World Conference, vol. 1, pp. 925-928. |
Gomez, M; “Consulting in the solar power age,” IEEE-CNSV: Consultants' Network of Silicon Valley, Nov. 13, 2007. |
Guo, G.Z.; “Design of a 400W, 1 Omega, Buck-boost Inverter for PV Applications,” 32nd Annual Canadian Solar Energy Conference, Jun. 10, 2007. |
Wang, Ucilia; Greentechmedia; “National semi casts solarmagic;” www.greentechmedia.com; Jul. 2, 2008. |
Kroposki, H. Thomas and Witt, B & C; “Progress in Photovoltaic Components and Systems,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, May 1, 2000; NREL-CP-520-27460. |
Hashimoto et al; “A Novel High Performance Utility Interactive Photovoltaic Inverter System,” Department of Electrical Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Miinami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0397, Japan; p. 2255, Aug. 6, 2002. |
Hua, C et al; “Control of DC-DC Converters for Solar energy System with Maximum Power Tracking,” Department of Electrical Engineering; National Yumin University of Science & Technology, Taiwan; vol. 2, Nov. 9-14, 1997; pp. 827-832. |
Kern, G; “SunSine (TM)300: Manufacture of an AC Photovoltaic Module,” Final Report, Phases I & II, Jul. 25, 1995-Jun. 30, 1998; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Mar. 1999; NREL-SR-520-26085. |
Kang, F et al; Photovoltaic Power Interface Circuit Incorporated with a Buck-boost Converter and a Full-bridge Inverter;' doi:10.1016-j.apenergy.2004.10.009. |
Kretschmar, K et al; “An AC Converter with a Small DC Link Capacitor for a 15kW Permanent Magnet Synchronous Integral Motor,Power Electronics and Variable Speed Drive,” 1998;7th International Conference; Conf. Publ. No. 456; Sep. 21-23, 1998; pp. 622-625. |
Lim, Y.H. et al; “Simple Maximum Power Point Tracker for Photovoltaic Arrays,” Electronics Letters May 25, 2000; vol. 36, No. 11. |
Linear Technology Specification Sheet, LTM4607, estimated as Nov. 14, 2007. |
Matsuo, H et al; Novel Solar Cell Power Supply System using the Multiple-input DC-DC Converter;' Telecommunications Energy Conference, 1998; INTELEC 20th International, pp. 797-8022. |
solar-electric.com; Northern Arizona Wind & Sun, All About MPPT Solar Charge Controllers; Nov. 5, 2007. |
Oldenkamp, H. et al; AC Modules: Past, Present and Future, Workshop Installing the Solar Solution; pp. 22-23; Jan. 1998; Hatfield, UK. |
Rodriguez, C; “Analytic Solution to the Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Problem;” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2007. |
De Doncker, R. W.; “Power Converter for PV-Systems,” Institute for Power Electrical Drives, RWTH Aachen Univ. Feb. 6, 2006. |
Roman, E et al; “Intelligent PV Module for Grid-Connected PV Systems;” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 53, No. 4, Aug. 2006. |
Russell, M.C. et al; “The Massachusetts Electric Solar Project: A Pilot Project to Commercialize Residential PC Systems,” Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 2000; Conference Record of the 28th IEEE; pp. 1583-1586. |
SatCon Power Systems, PowerGate Photovoltaic 50kW Power Converter System; Spec Sheet; Jun. 2004. |
Schekulin, Dirk et al; “Module-integratable Inverters in the Power-Range of 100-400 Watts,” 13th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Oct. 23-27, 1995; Nice, France; p. 1893-1896. |
Shimizu, et al; “Generation Control Circuit for Photovoltaic Modules,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 16, No. 3, May 2001. |
Takahashi, I. et al; “Development of a Long-life Three-phase Flywheel UPS Using an Electrolytic Capacitorless Converter-inverter,” 1999 Scripta Technica, Electr. Eng. Jpn, 127(3); 25-32. |
Walker, G.R. et al; “Cascaded DC-DC Converter Connection of Photovoltaic Modules,” IEEE Transactions of Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul. 2004. |
Walker, G.R. et al; “PV String Per-Module Power Point Enabling Converters,” School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering; The University of Queensland, presented at the Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference, Sep. 28-Oct. 1, 2003 in Christchurch; AUPEC2003. |
Cambridge Consultants, Interface Issue 43, Autumn 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/980,157, filed Oct. 15, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/982,053, filed Oct. 23, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/986,979, filed Nov. 15, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/868,851, filed Dec. 6, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/868,893, filed Dec. 6, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/868,962, filed Dec. 7, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/908,095, filed Mar. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/916,815, filed May 9, 2007. |
(Parent application) U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068, filed Apr. 14, 2010. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/80794, Written Opinion dated Feb. 23, 2009. |
International Application No. PCT/US09/41044, Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2009. |
International Application No. PCT/US09/41044, Search Report dated Jun. 5, 2009. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Mar. 12, 2010. |
Roman, E., et al. Experimental results of controlled PV Module for building integrated PV systems; Science Direct; Solar Energy, vol. 82, Issue 5, May 2008, pp. 471-480. |
Verhoeve, C.W.G., et al., Recent Test Results of AC-Module inverters, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, 1997. |
Stern M., et al., Development of a Low-Cost Integrated 20-kW-AC Solar Tracking Subarray for Gid-Connected PV Power System Applications—Final Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Jun. 1998. |
Schoen, T.J.N., BIPV overview & getting PV into the marketplace in the Netherlands, The 2nd World Solar Electric Buildings Conference: Sydney Mar. 8-10, 2000. |
Knaupp, W. et al., Operation of A 10 kW PV facade with 100 W AC photovoltaic modules, 25th PVSC; May 13-17, 1996; Washington D.C. |
Linares, L., et al., Improved Energy Capture in Series String Photovoltaics via Smart Distributed Power Electronics; Proceedings APEC 2009: 24th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Washington, D.C., Feb. 2009. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/80794, Search Report dated Feb. 23, 2009. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/79605, Written Opinion dated Feb. 3, 2009. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/79605, Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2009. |
Edelmoser, K. H. et al.; High Efficiency DC-to-AC Power Inverter with Special DC Interface; Professional Paper, ISSN 0005-1144, Automatika 46 (2005) 3-4, 143-148. |
Esmaili, Gholamreza; Application of Advanced Power Electronics in Renewable Energy Sources and Hygrid Generating Systems, Ohio State University, Graduate Program in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2006, Dissertation. |
Jung, D; Soft Switching Boost Converter for Photovoltaic Power Generation System, 2008 13th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE-PEMC 2008). |
Joo, Hyuk Lee; “Soft Switching Multi-Phase Boost Converter for Photovoltaic System,” Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, 2008. EPE-PEMC 2008. 13th Sep. 1, 2008. |
Kuo, J.-L.; “Duty-based Control of Maximum Power Point Regulation for Power Converter in Solar Fan System with Battery Storage,” Proceedings of the Third IASTED Asian Conference, Apr. 2, 2007, Phuket, Thialand. |
Enslin, J.H.R.; “Integrated Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking Converter;” Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on vol. 44, Issue 6, Dec. 1997, pp. 769-773. |
Dehbonei, Hooman; Corp author(s): Curtin University of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering; 2003; Description: xxi, 284 leaves; ill.; 31 cm. Dissertation: Thesis. Abstract. |
Duncan, Joseph, A Global Maximum Power Point Tracking DC-DC Converter, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Dissertation; Jan. 20, 2005. |
Enrique, J.M.; Duran, E; Sidrach-de-Cadona, M; Andujar, JM; “Theoretical Assessment of the Maximum Power Point Tracking Efficiency of Photovoltaic Facilities with Different Converter Topologies;” Source: Solar Energy 81, No. 1 (2007); 31 (8 pages). |
Association for Applied Solar Energy, Alt. Journal; Uniform Title: Solar energy (Photnix, AZ); Key Title: Solar energy; Preceding Title: Journal of solar energy, science and engineering; Standard No. ISSN: 0038-092X CODEN: SRENA4. No abstract available. |
Tse, K.K.et al. “A Novel Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for PV Panels;” Dept. of Electronic Engineering, City Univerisity of Hong Kong; Source: PESC Record—IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference, v 4, 2001, p. 1970-1975, Jun. 17-21, 2001; Abstract. |
Mutoh, Nobuyoshi; A Photovoltaic Generation System Acquiring Efficiently the Electrical Energy Generated with Solar Rays,; Graduate School of Tokyo, Metropolitan Institute of Technology; Source: Series on Energy and Power Systems, Proceedings of the Fourth IASTED International Conference on Power and Energy Systems, Jun. 28-30, 2004; p. 97-103. Abstract. |
Rajan, Anita; “Maximum Power Point Tracker Optimized for Solar Powered Cars;” Society of Automotive Engineers, Transactions, v 99, n Sect 6, 1990, p. 1408-1420; Abstract. |
Mutoh, Nobuyoshi, “A Controlling Method for Charging Photovoltaic Generation Power Obtained by a MPPT Control Method to Series Connected Ultra-electric Double Layer Capacitors;” Intelligent Systems Department, Faculty of Engineering, Graduate School of Tokyo; 39th IAS Annual Meeting (IEEE Industry Applications Society); v 4, 2004, p. 2264-2271. Abstract. |
Ho, Billy M.T.; “An Integrated Inverter with Maximum Power Tracking for Grid-Connected PV Systems;” Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong; Conference Proceedings, 19th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Feb. 22-26, 2004; p. 1559-1565. |
Esram, T., Chapman, P.L., “Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques,” Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions, Vo. 22, No. 2, pp. 439-449, Jun. 2007. |
Nishida, Yasuyuki, “A Novel Type of Utility-interactive Inverter for Photovoltaic System,” Conference Proceedings, IPEMC 2004; 4th International Power and Electronics Conference, Aug. 14-16, 2004; Xian Jiaotong University Press, Xian, China; p. 1785-1790. Abstract. |
Anon Source; International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, Jul. 12-13, 2007; Iasi, Romania; Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electroncis Engineers Computer Society; Abstract. |
Case, M.J.; “Minimum Component Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracker,” Vector (Electrical Engineering), Jun. 1999; p. 4-8; Abstract. |
Xue, John, “PV Module Series String Balancing Converters,” Supervised by Geoffrey Walker, Nov. 6, 2002; University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering. |
Siri, K; “Study of System Instability in Current-mode Converter Power Systems Operating in Solar Array Voltage Regulation Mode,” Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Systems, Aerospace Corp., El Segundo, CA; Feb. 6-10, 2000 in New Orleans, LA, 15th Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, pp. 228-234. |
Reimann, T, Szeponik, S; Berger, G; Petzoldt, J; “A Novel Control Principle of Bi-directional DC-DC Power Conversion,” 28th Annual IEEE Power Electroncis Specialists Conference, St. Louis, MO Jun. 22-27, 1997; vol. 2 pp. 978-984. Abstract. |
Kaiwei, Yao, Mao, Ye; Ming, Xu; Lee, F.C.; “Tapped-inductor Buck Converter for High-step-down DC-DC Conversion,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 20, Issue 4, Jul. 2005; pp. 775-780; Abstract. |
Ertl, H; Kolar, J.W.; Zach, F.C.; “A Novel Multicell DC-AC Converter for Applications in Renewable Energy Systems;” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Oct. 2002; vol. 49, Issue 5, pp. 1048-1057; Abstract. |
Bascope, G.V.T.; Barbi, I; “Generation of a Family of Non-isolated DC-DC PWM Converters Using New Three-state Switching Cells;” 2000 IEEE 31st Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference in Galway, Ireland; vol. 2, pp. 858-863; Abstract. |
Duan, Rouo-Yong; Chang, Chao-Tsung; “A Novel High-efficiency Inverter for Stand-alone and Grid-connected Systems,” 2008 3rd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications in Singapore, Jun. 3-5, 2008; Article No. 4582577. Abstract. |
Cuadras, A; Ben Amor, N; Kanoun, O; “Smart Interfaces for Low Power Energy Harvesting Systems,” 2008 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference May 12-15, 2008 in Victoria, BC Canada; pp. 78-82 and 12-15. Abstract. |
Quan, Li; Wolfs, P; “An Analysis of the ZVS Two-inductor Boost Converter Under Variable Frequency Operation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Central Queensland University, Rockhamton, Qld, AU; vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2007; pp. 120-131. Abstract. |
Yuvarajan, S; Dachuan, Yu; Shanguang, Xu; “A Novel Power Converter for Photovoltaic Applications,” Journal of Power Sources, Sep. 3, 2004; vol. 135, No. 1-2, pp. 327-331; Abstract. |
Power Article, Aerospace Systems Lab, Washington University, St. Louis, MO; estimated at Sep. 2007. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/60345, International Search Report dated Aug. 18, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/60345, Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, International Search Report dated Jun. 25, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/57105, Written Opinion dated Jun. 25, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/70506, International Search Report dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/70506, Written Opinion dated Sep. 26, 2008. |
Chen, J., et al. Buck-Boost PWM Converters Having Two Independently Controlled Switches, IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jun. 2001, vol. 2, pp. 736-741. |
Walker, G. et al. PhotoVoltaic DC-DC Module Integrated Converter for Novel Cascaded and Bypass Grid Connection Topologies—Design and Optimisation, 37th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference / Jun. 18-22, 2006, Jeju, Korea. |
Chen, J., et al. A New Low-Stress Buck-Boost Converter for Universal-Input PFC Applications, IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Feb. 2001. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/70506 corrected International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Jun. 25, 2010. |
SM3320 Power Optimizer Specifications; SolarMagic Power Optimizer Apr. 2009. |
Feuermann, D. et al., Reversible low solar heat gain windows for energy savings. Solar Energy vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 169-175, 1998. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/60345. International Prelimianry Report on Patentability dated Aug. 30, 2010. |
TwentyNinety.com/en/about-us/, printed Aug. 17, 2010; 3 pages. |
National Semiconductor News Release—National semiconductor's SolarMagic Chipset Makes Solar Panels “Smarter” May 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/252,998, filed Oct. 19, 2009, entitled Solar Module Circuit with Staggered Diode Arrangement. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Nonfinal Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2010. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Oct. 20, 2010; mailed Oct. 26, 2010. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Oct. 20, 2010. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Nonfinal Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2010. |
European Patent Application No. 07 873 361.5 Office Communication dated Jul. 12, 2010 and applicant's response dated Nov. 22, 2010. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/079605. International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 21, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Feb. 3, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Feb. 3, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Examiner's Interview Summary dated Feb. 4, 2011. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/053253. International Search Report and International Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 22, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/738,068; Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 24, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/955,704; Nonfinal Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Final Office Action dated May 13, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/995,704; Notice of allowance dated Jul. 19, 2011. |
International Application No. PCT/US09/41044; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated Jul. 6, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,882; Notice of allowance dated Sep. 9, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Nonfinal office action dated Sep. 23, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Nonfinal office action dated Dec. 29, 2011. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Nonfinal office action dated Jan. 23, 2012. |
International Application No. PCT/US10/53253; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated Jan. 25, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,559; Notice of allowance dated Apr. 17, 2012. |
International Application No. PCT/US08/80794; International Preliminary Report on Patentabiity dated May 8, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,492; Nonfinal office action dated May 16, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,329; Final office action dated Jun. 13, 2012. |
Parallel CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; office action dated Sep. 26, 2011. |
Parallel CN Patent Application No. 200880121101.7; office action dated Jun. 11, 2012. |
Parallel U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,329; Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 30, 2012. |
International Application No. PCT/2012/022266, International Search Report dated Jul. 24, 2012. |
International Application No. PCT/2012/022266, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 24, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,147; Final office action dated Aug. 24, 2012. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 200880121009.0, Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/059,955; Final office action dated Sep. 27, 2012. |
Singapore Patent Application No. 201107477-0; written opinion dated Nov. 27, 2012. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-529991; office action dated Dec. 18, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110181251 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60982053 | Oct 2007 | US | |
60986979 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12738068 | US | |
Child | 13078492 | US |