The present invention relates to a power circuit interrupting device that electrically connects and disconnects a power circuit of a hybrid motor vehicle, an electric motor vehicle, etc.
Upon carrying out a maintenance work of a hybrid motor vehicle, an electric motor vehicle, etc., a power circuit must be brought into interruption by a manual operation in order to ensure safe of a maintenance worker. Such a power circuit interrupting device as described in the following Patent Literature 1 is known.
The device as described in Patent Literature 1 includes a pair of fixed electrodes and a fuse which are disposed in a casing, a moveable electrode capable of being coupled to the fixed electrodes to establish electrical connection between the fixed electrodes and being uncoupled from the fixed electrodes to interrupt the electrical connection therebetween, and a coupling/uncoupling operation handle provided with the moveable electrode. The device is constructed such that a conduction path is accommodated within the casing when an electrical continuity is established, and therefore, the device is excellent in view of safety.
However, in the device described in the Patent Literature 1, the fuse is disposed within the casing. Due to this construction, in order to carry out a continuity test for the fuse, it is necessary to uncouple the moveable electrode from the fixed electrodes, loosen screws, and open the casing to thereby expose the fuse outside. Accordingly, it takes a long time for performing the test procedure.
Patent Literature 1: Japanese Patent Application Unexamined Publication No. 9-265874
A power circuit interrupting device according the present invention includes a first housing including a pair of fixed electrodes and a fuse, and a second housing including a moveable electrode, the moveable electrode interrupting electrical connection between the fixed electrodes when the second housing is uncoupled from the first housing, and establishing the electrical connection between the fixed electrodes when the second housing is coupled with the first housing. The first housing has an opening provided for carrying out a continuity test for the fuse. The opening is covered with the second housing in a condition that continuity of a circuit is allowed.
In the device according to the present invention, it is possible to carry out a continuity test for the fuse without exposing a whole portion of the fuse. Therefore, the device can serve to reduce a time for performing the test procedure. Further, in order to carry out the continuity test, the second housing having the moveable electrode must be uncoupled from the first housing, whereby the device can serve to keep safety. In addition, since the opening for the continuity test is covered with the second housing in a normal condition in which continuity of the power circuit is allowed, a foreign material such as dust can be prevented from entering into the device.
In the following, an embodiment of the present invention is explained by referring to
SDSW 1 includes first housing 3 including a pair of fixed electrodes and fuse 5, and second housing 4 including a moveable electrode that is uncoupled from the fixed electrodes to disconnect the fixed electrodes from each other or coupled with the fixed electrodes to connect the fixed electrodes with each other. A work of a continuity test can be safely performed by interrupting the electrical connection between batteries by uncoupling the moveable electrode from the fixed electrodes through second housing 4 or establishing the electrical connection between batteries by coupling the moveable electrode with the fixed electrodes through second housing 4.
In a condition that continuity of the circuit is allowed, electric current from the batteries flows to an inverter and a DC/DC converter through a main relay.
If openings 11 are disposed on an outside of peripheral wall portion 8, the continuity test can be carried out even in the condition that continuity of the power circuit is allowed. Therefore, safety of a worker of the continuity test can be not always ensured. In this embodiment, since openings 11 cannot be exposed outside unless second housing 4 is detached, it is possible to surely comply with such a maintenance procedure that the continuity test is carried out after continuity of the power circuit must be interrupted.
Further, since openings 11 are covered with second housing 4 in the condition that continuity of the power circuit is allowed, entrance of a foreign material such as dust, etc. into battery pack 2 can be prevented even though a dedicated cover is not provided for openings 11.
As shown in
In a case where fixed electrodes each having an elongated shape are used, the present invention may be embodied as shown in
In this embodiment, fuse cap 20a on the side of fuse terminal 17a serves as a conductor as a whole including an outer surface thereof. The continuity test is carried out by contacting probe 22 inserted through opening 11a with fuse cap 20a. When not fuse terminal 17a but fuse cap 20a is thus utilized in the continuity test, a distance y between fuse cap 20aand fuse terminal 17b electrically connected to fixed electrode terminal 10 is shorter than a distance z between fuse terminal 17a and fuse terminal 17b electrically connected to fixed electrode terminal 10. Therefore, it is possible to locate opening 11a closer to fixed electrode 10. Accordingly, peripheral wall portion 8 can be reduced in size, and therefore, second housing 4 can be reduced in size.
Further, in a case where only one fuse cap 20a of the pair of fuse caps 20a, 20bis formed as a conductor, there is a possibility that fuse 5 is connected in a reverse direction upon assembling the apparatus and thereby the continuity test cannot be carried out. To avoid such a problem, in this embodiment, fuse cap 20b on the side of fuse terminal 17b is also formed as a conductor, and opening 11b associated with fuse cap 20b is provided.
As a result, it is possible to carry out the continuity test in a stable condition.
As shown in
Although in the above-described embodiment, the procedure of carrying out the continuity test in such a state that second housing 4 is detached to expose fixed electrode terminals 9, 10, is explained, dedicated cap 25 capable of being inserted into peripheral wall portion 8 after detaching second housing 4 may be used in order to completely prohibit use of fixed electrode terminals 9, 10 for the continuity test.
Further, although in the above-described embodiment, seal 19 is provided in second housing 4, seal 19 may be provided on the side of peripheral wall portion 8. Even in such a case, same effects as those in the above-described embodiment can be obtained.
In addition, in a case where SDSW 1 is arranged in a position in which SDSW 1 is prevented from contacting with water, the seal can be omitted. Further, peripheral wall portion 8 can be provided with a vent hole that has such a size as to prevent insertion of probe 22.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010-260694 | Nov 2010 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2011/072982 | 10/5/2011 | WO | 00 | 5/21/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/070318 | 5/31/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4067103 | Ciesmier | Jan 1978 | A |
4344060 | Ciesemier | Aug 1982 | A |
5831228 | Kuki et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842560 | Kuki et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847338 | Kuki et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859580 | Hashizawa et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6054915 | Rowton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6101079 | Viklund | Aug 2000 | A |
6157287 | Douglass et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6407656 | Konda et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6459354 | Konda et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6459558 | Hashizawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7948353 | Deno et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20050098419 | Matsui et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20100245025 | de Leon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1164112 | Nov 1997 | CN |
297 21 446 | Apr 1998 | DE |
0 790 677 | Aug 1997 | EP |
5-55721 | Jul 1993 | JP |
9-265874 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10-83753 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2000-251611 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-126592 | May 2001 | JP |
2009-37778 | Feb 2009 | JP |
90 276 | Dec 2009 | RU |
Entry |
---|
Russian Decision on Grant and English language translation dated Jul. 10, 2014, 12 pgs. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2014, 6 pgs. |
Korean Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2014 (4 pgs.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130241687 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |