Patent Grant
7170244
The invention relates to systems for monitoring and controlling the movement of closure devices which may be adjusted by means of motors, and more particularly to anti-jamming/anti-pinch systems for power closures, such as vehicle power windows, powered doors, and sliding roofs.
To address safety concerns in power operated closures in motor vehicles, a number of systems have been developed. These systems typically have a closure, a motor coupled with the closure, a sensor, and a processor with an algorithm for evaluating system data and initiating an anti-pinch (a stop or reverse direction) response. Systems have been developed that monitor current, speed or voltage changes to determine if a jam event has occurred. Examples of anti-pinch systems include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,548,974, 5,994,858; 5,872,436; 5,610,484; 5,585,705; 5,585,702; 5,436,539; 4,746,845; 4,709,196; 4,641,067; 4,585,981; 4,468,596; and 4,347,465; the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 118 (FMVSS 118) was established in 1991 to set some specific requirements for certain power operated windows, partitions, and roof panel systems in motor vehicles to minimize the likelihood of death or injury from accidental operation. The standard under certain circumstances requires a power-operated window to reverse prior to generating 100 N of compressive force on an obstruction. The compressive force is to be measured by test rods, one of which has a diameter of up to 25 mm and a spring constant of 65 N/mm, and another with a diameter up to 200 mm and a spring constant of 20 N/mm—see 49 C.F.R. 571.118.
However, present day systems have one or more limitations which do not satisfactorily address manufacturing variability and tolerance stack-up, system compliance, a wide range of environmental operating conditions, system wear, governmental regulations, or various window designs in a robust and simple manner. Therefore, what is needed is a system for monitoring and controlling the movement of power closures that reduces or overcomes one or more of the short comings of present day systems.
Disclosed herein is a power closure comprising a simple and robust system which can detect a jamming event and/or initiate an anti-pinch response.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the power closure system includes a closure, an electric motor operatively connected to the closure; a sensor operatively producing signals indicative of the motor speed; and an anti-pinch activator in communication with the sensor and the motor.
The power closure may be any suitable power closure device, such as a powered window for an automobile, moon roof, sliding door, hinged door, etc. The sensor may be any suitable sensing device, such as a position sensor, hall effect sensor, etc. The anti-pinch activator may be any device suitable for initiating an anti-pinch response, such as a processor and/or circuit, circuit board, computer chip, and/or storage device, which may further include suitable programming, such as an instruction set for an algorithm.
The anti-pinch activator preferably includes a predetermined Trigger Value; a Measured Value corresponding to a speed of the motor; a Stored Value created from a Measured Value; a comparator for comparing the Stored Value to the Measured Value and initiating an anti-pinch response when the difference between the Stored Value and the Measured Value is greater than the Trigger Value and the speed of the closure is decreasing; a predetermined modifying calculation for changing the Stored Value to a new Stored Value when there is a difference between the Measured Value and the Stored Value and the motor speed indicated by the Measured Value indicates a motor speed less than the motor speed indicated by the Stored Value.
One of the issues with existing anti-pinch systems is being able to distinguish an anti-pinch event from a natural variation in the speed of the closure movement. For example, while the closure is moving an obstructing object in the path of the closure will eventually result in a reduction in the speed of closure movement. However, there are many naturally occurring events that can also cause variations in speed, such as build variations between closure systems and variations in seal resistance. Many of these naturally occurring events not only cause variation from system to system but can cause variation within the system, such as varying speeds of the closure over the path of travel during a single closing. Examples of events that can cause variation within a system include environmental conditions, such as ice, extreme temperature conditions, dirt accumulation in localized areas etc.
The difficulty of differentiating between natural variations and a ‘true’ pinch event is addressed with the disclosed anti-pinch activator and the use of a ‘Stored Value’. The Stored Value is a function of a Measured Value. The ‘Measured Value’ corresponds closely to the current or more recent speed of the closure. The Measured Value may be determined each time a signal from the sensor indicates a predetermined amount of closure movement. The Stored Value may be created from a Measured Value at some point in time and is preferably stored electronically, such as in a microprocessor. Both the Measured Value and the Stored Value therefore correspond to a speed of the closure. The preferred algorithm of the anti-pinch activator keeps the values of Measured Value and Stored Value nearly equal when the closure is accelerating or moving at constant speed, e.g. when a pinch event is not being experienced. Whenever the speed of the closure is decelerating, and this could be from natural variations or from a pinch event, the Stored Value is not necessarily kept equal to the Measured Value. Instead, each time a Measured Value is obtained which corresponds to a slower closure speed compared to the Stored Value, the Stored Value is changed by a predetermined modifying calculation. Under conditions of natural speed variation, where the closure is decelerating slowly, the algorithm preferably keeps the Stored Value very close to the Measured Value. If the Stored Value and the Measured Value are kept close, the difference between the two is small enough that a pinch event will not be initiated. However, when the closure is decelerating more rapidly, as for example when the closure encounters an obstruction in its path, the algorithm will not keep the Stored Value nearly equal to the Measured Value. In that case, the predetermined modifying calculations preferably allows the two values to diverge until the difference is large enough to surpass a ‘Trigger Value’ and initiate a pinch event. Because of the flexibility of this type of system, the system can be fined tuned to any number of closure systems to filter out naturally occurring variations and still respond to a pinch event.
In one embodiment of the anti-pinch system, it may be useful for the Measured Value to correspond to the speed of the closure by measuring the speed of the driving motor. This may include any measurement that indicates motor speed, such as revolutions of the motor, motor shaft rotation, time of a motor revolution or a partial revolution, etc. These measurements may be obtained directly from the motor or down stream of any speed-adjusting gearbox associated with the motor. While it is possible to determine motor speed with a single measurement, it may be useful with other embodiments to calculate the measured value from multiple measurements of the motor speed. Using averages or totals tends to reduce the variation that may occur due to manufacturing variations and/or random measuring errors. The Measured Value is preferably handled as a single value, whether it is based on a single or on multiple measurements. Each time a new measurement of the motor is obtained, a new value of Measured Value can be set.
In another embodiment, the initial Stored Value is determined first from an initial value of the Measured Value. Thus, the first value of the Stored Value will be equal to the first Measured Value. The subsequent values of the Stored Value will preferably depend upon subsequently determined values of the Measured Value and upon the application of the modifying calculation. In the case where the speed of the motor is increasing, the value of the Stored Value is preferably replaced by a new value of the Measured Value. However, this replacement by substitution preferably does not occur when the motor speed is decreasing. Instead, when the motor speed is decreasing, the stored value is preferably modified by a predetermined modifying calculation. This calculation can consist of adding or subtracting a value or multiplying or dividing by a factor.
Earlier, it was discussed how the speed of the closure can vary during the process of closing or opening the closure. It is noted that the closure speed can vary greatly for a single closure from one opening or closure to another opening or closure. For instance, a vehicle parked out of doors in sub zero temperatures will see slower closure speeds. However, if the vehicle is then moved to a heated garage and the vehicle is allowed to warm, the next movement of the closure should be much faster. Speed variation may be a function of seal resistance, which will typically be lessened by increasing temperatures. Also, variation in voltage supplied to the motor from the vehicle's battery from one closing cycle to another can result in wide variations in speed of the closure. With the engine of the vehicle not running, the closure could be powered by an older weaker battery, which provides a relatively low voltage. A moment later, with the engine running and with a higher voltage being provided by the alternator of the vehicle, the closure will move much faster.
Thus, in another embodiment of the anti-pinch system, compensation can be provided for a wide variation in the expected operational speed of the closure. This may be accomplished in a number of ways, such as providing multiple values for the Trigger Value or adjusting the modifying calculation. For example, the expected operational speed range of the motor may be broken-up into sequential increments with a different value of Trigger Value assigned to each increment. These increments may be very small resulting in a large number of Trigger Values or the increments may be larger resulting is fewer values for Trigger Value. Variations in closure systems and the level of desired anti-pinch performance should determine the number of increments required for each application. Alternatively or in addition thereto, the modifying calculations applied to the Stored Value can also have multiple values correlated to the operational speed of the closure.
In still other preferred embodiments, the anti-pinch activator is adapted to meet both the U.S. safety standards and the European safety standards for powered closures for automobiles. In a preferred embodiment, the anti-pinch activator is adapted to initiate an anti-pinch response when the compression force in the closing path is 100 N or less when measured with spring constants of 10, 20 and 65 Newtons per millimeter. This may be accomplished by adjusting the Trigger Value and/or the modifying calculation(s) for a particular closure system.
Another issue with some existing anti-pinch systems is the occurrence of ‘false reversals’. A false reversal is an event where the movement of the glass is stopped and/or reversed when there is really no anti-pinch obstacle in the path of the closure. A false reversal can occur when the anti-pinch actuator is set too sensitive. A false reversal can also occur when there is wide variation in the speed of the closure resulting from environmental changes or wear of the seals over time. Therefore, in accordance herewith, the Trigger Value and/or the modifying calculation can be used to increase or decrease the sensitivity of the anti-pinch response. And since both of these can be set as functions of the operating speed of the closure, good robustness against false reversals can be obtained.
During closure movement it may be desirable to only activate the anti-pinch system during a portion of closure travel. As such, the anti-pinch function can be turned off as the closure is driven into a seal to firmly seat the closure in the fully closed position while generating the necessary sealing force to insure against intrusion of air or water. To ignore initial and/or end travel conditions the anti-pinch activator may be idle, disabled, by-passed, or turned off in some manner over that portion of travel. A preferred range of travel ignores either the initial travel conditions or the end of travel conditions or both, such as the first 200 mm and the last 4 mm of travel depending on the size of the overall closure opening.
The anti-pinch activator of a preferred embodiment includes of a micro-controller 22, such as the PIC16F684 micro-controller, manufactured by Microchip. The micro-controller preferably contains an internal timer that can measure discrete increments of time. The timer is preferably used in conjunction with a displacement sensor 20, such as a Hall Effect sensor, to measure the time for a predetermined amount of rotation of the drive motor. The time increment used by the timer is preferably configurable.
Now by way of example and for purposes of understanding, the closure system includes a Hall Effect sensor and the motor includes a magnet which rotates with the motor shaft and has eight poles, keeping in mind that motors with less or more than eight poles could also be utilized with the algorithm, a different sensor can be used, and other adjustments can be made all of which should be considered as part of the invention with out limitation unless so specified in by Claims. The timer of the micro-controller is set to four microseconds per count of time (0.000004 sec./Ct.). The motor includes the multi pole-magnet that rotates with the motor shaft and triggers a signal from the Hall Effect Sensor each time one of the poles of the multi-pole magnet rotates past the Hall Effect Sensor. The micro-controller counts the total number of Counts of Time between two consecutive Hall Effect signals and stores this number in memory. This number represents the period of one eight of a rotation of the motor and this period is inversely proportional to the rotational speed of the motor shaft and thus is also inversely proportional to the speed of the closure.
Referring specifically to the table shown and again by way of example, if at some point the Stored Value was between 569 and 481 counts of time and the Measured Value is greater than the Stored Value by 38 counts of time, an anti-pinch response would be initiated. The last column of the Look Up Table contains an example of a Correction Factor. The Correction Factor is a value used to modify the Stored Value. This modification of the Stored Value produces Calculated Differences that provide a more robust system against natural speed variations yet not have so great an effect as to mask a real anti-pinch event. The Correction Factor, in this example, is an amount added to the Stored Value in the case where the Measured Value is greater than the Stored Value and an anti-pinch response is not initiated. The values assigned to the Correction Factor could also be increased or decreased to optimize various door systems. In this example an adjustment up would make the system less sensitive to a jamming event, and an adjustment down would make the system more sensitive. Thus the Look-Up Table can be configured to optimize the performance of the algorithm with different door systems.
In an alternative embodiment, the Correction Factor may be applied at a rate of less than every loop thru the algorithm, which in effect would allow fractional Correction Factors. For example, applying a Correction Factor of 2 every third loop would produce an equivalent Correction Factor of two thirds per loop, etc.. Also, while this example describes entry into the Look-Up Table using the Stored Value, it may also be appropriate to enter the Look-up Table using the value of the Measured Value.
While the Preferred Embodiment describes anti-pinch protection during closing, there are closures, such as side sliding windows where sliding glass overlaps the fixed glass. Overlapping glass can create pinch points when the window is opening as well as when it is closing. In these cases it might be advantageous to have anti-pinch protection during both opening and closing of the closure system.
Furthermore, it should be noted that each closure system has a certain amount of inherent springiness. This springiness can be defined by an equivalent spring constant or series of spring constants that result in overall system compliance. The system compliance of each closure system acts in conjunction with the spring constant of the force gage used to measure the force at the point of reversal during an anti-pinch event. The system compliance of the door system can vary widely from door to door and depends on basic door design, seal design and the type of window lift mechanism being used. The anti-pinch activator disclosed herein allows compensation for system compliance in a wide range of door systems by allowing utilization of ring magnets with various numbers of magnet poles, by allowing wide variation in the sampling time of the microprocessor (four micro-seconds in the preferred embodiment), and by allowing single or averaged measurements to define Measured Value. Also the Look Up Table can use various levels of Trigger Values and Correction Factors, which may be fine-tuned to each door system to accommodate system compliance. The Look Up Table shown above has the operating speed of the motor divided into nine different ranges with corresponding Trigger Values and Correction Factors; however, more or less divisions of the speed range can be used depending on the requirements of each door system. More table entries may be used to get better resolution but at the cost of requiring more memory in the micro-processor. Thus the basic anti-pinch activator and algorithm can be utilized with a wide range of variables and be optimized for a wide variety of door systems and customer requirements.
While the disclosed and claimed system is particularly suitable for use in vertical power windows, sliding power windows, sliding roof panels, and hinged or sliding doors for motor vehicles, the system may be applied to many other types of powered closures with little or no modifications. In light of the foregoing disclosure of the invention and description of the preferred embodiments, those skilled in this area of technology will readily understand that various modifications and adaptations can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Therefore, all such modifications and adaptations that amount to their equivalences are intended to be covered by the following claims, even if such claims have been modified during prosecution.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4347465 | Goertler et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4468596 | Kinzl et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4585981 | Zintler | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4641067 | Iizawa et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4709196 | Mizuta | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4746845 | Mizuta et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 5334876 | Washeleski et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5436539 | Wrenbeck et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5530329 | Shigematsu et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5585702 | Jackson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5585705 | Brieden | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5610484 | Georgin | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5872436 | Bergmann et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5932931 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5994858 | Miura | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6274947 | Terashima | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6366042 | Gerbetz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6408238 | Lamm et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6548974 | Filgueiras | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6580242 | Hirose et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060208678 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
