The subject matter disclosed herein relates to monitoring power consumption to verify compliance with a power consumption limitation agreement during a demand response event or agreed period of limited power consumption.
During moments of peak power consumption, a significant strain may be placed on utility providers and the power grid supplying power to consumers. These peak demand periods often occur during the hottest parts of a day, when large numbers of residential and commercial consumers are running heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) appliances. In many cases, HVAC appliances may be running at consumers' homes even while the consumers are away. Although a utility provider may desire to offer incentives to consumers to turn off certain high-consumption loads (e.g., HVAC and other appliances) during these peak demand periods, utility providers have lacked the ability to verify whether consumers have complied with a request not to run certain loads at specific times.
Certain embodiments commensurate in scope with the originally claimed invention are summarized below. These embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed invention, but rather these embodiments are intended only to provide a brief summary of possible forms of the invention. Indeed, the invention may encompass a variety of forms that may be similar to or different from the embodiments set forth below.
In a first embodiment, a system includes storage containing a load profile representative of a pattern of power consumption by a type of load and data processing circuitry. The data processing circuitry may compare a power usage profile representing power consumption by a consumer at least over a period of time to the load profile to determine whether the consumer is running the type of load over the period of time.
In a second embodiment, an article of manufacture includes one or more tangible, machine-readable media at least collectively having instructions encoded thereon for execution by a processor. These instructions may include instructions to receive a power usage profile representing power consumption by a consumer that took place at least during a demand response event and to receive a load profile representative of a pattern of power consumption by a type of load. The instructions also may include instructions to compare the power usage profile to the load profile and to indicate, when a component of the power usage profile matches the load profile, that the consumer ran the type of load during the demand response event.
In a third embodiment, a method includes receiving a power usage profile (which represents power consumption by a consumer measured by a power meter) before a start of a demand response event and determining whether the power usage profile indicates that the consumer is running a type of load. When the power usage profile indicates that the consumer is running the type of load, the method includes causing an indication to be displayed at the power meter that the type of load has been determined to be running.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
When introducing elements of various embodiments of the present invention, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
As noted above, during peak demand periods, a utility provider may desire to offer incentives to consumers not to run certain loads (e.g., high-power-consuming appliances) to prevent demand from exceeding the available power supply, which may result in power disruptions such as blackouts or brownouts. These peak demand periods often occur during the hottest parts of a day, when large numbers of residential and commercial consumers are running HVAC appliances. As such, the peak demand could be reduced if some of these consumers agreed not to run their HVAC appliances (or other high-power-consumption loads such as charging an electric vehicle) during these peak demand periods. In exchange for agreeing not to run such loads during a demand response event occurring at peak demand periods, a utility provider could offer incentives, such as lower power rates or other benefits. As used herein, a request from a power utility to a consumer not to run a type of load at a certain period of high power demand, so as to mitigate excess power demand, is referred to as a “demand response event request.” Such a demand response event request may also be predefined in a contract determining preset times when the consumer is requested not to run certain loads (e.g., certain times of day during certain days or moths of the year when peak load is known to be high). The high power demand period during which a consumer has been requested not to run the type of load may be referred to herein as a “demand response event,” but in this disclosure, the term “demand response event” should be understood to refer to any agreed period of limited power consumption.
Without a way to verify consumer compliance during a demand response event, a utility provider may be unaware as to when a consumer agrees not to run a high-power-consumption load (e.g., a high-power-consumption appliance) during a demand response event, but subsequently fails to fulfill their agreement. Accordingly, embodiments of the present disclosure relate to techniques for verifying that a consumer has shut down or has not otherwise run the requested type of load during a demand response event. In particular, according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure, a power meter may sample the power consumption taking place at certain discrete points in time for a period of time that includes the demand response event to obtain a power usage profile. Since different types of loads may consume power according to different patterns of power consumption over time, whether a consumer is running the proscribed type of load may involve comparing this power usage profile to load profiles representing these different patterns of power consumption.
In particular, an electronic device, referred to herein as a “compliance server,” may compare the power usage profile to one or more load profiles. When a match is found, it may be understood that the consumer is running the type of load associated with that load profile. Thus, when the power usage profile matches a load profile associated with the type of load the consumer agreed not to run, the utility provider may be made aware that the consumer is not in compliance with the demand response event request.
In addition, when a user has agreed not to run a particular load (e.g., an HVAC system) during a demand response event, but the consumer is running the load before the start of the demand response event, the consumer may be reminded prior to the start of the demand response event. That is, the power meter may sample the power consumption by the consumer over time prior to the start of the demand response event to obtain a power usage profile. The compliance server may compare this power usage profile with one or more load profiles associated with the type of load the consumer as agreed not to run during the demand response event. If the user is not in compliance before the start of the demand response event, the compliance server or the utility provider may notify the consumer of their current non-compliance, enabling the consumer to prepare for the demand response event by shutting off the type of load as previously agreed.
With the foregoing in mind,
A local power meter 20 may track the amount of power consumed by each consumer 12. Each power meter 20 may include sampling circuitry 22 and a consumer interface 24, and certain communication circuitry 26 with which the power meter 20 may communicate with the utility provider 14. During periods of peak power demand, or a “demand response event,” the utility provider 14 may desire to offer incentives to the consumers 12 in exchange for refraining from running certain high-power-consuming loads 18 in a “demand response event request.” The utility provider 14 may communicate such a request to the consumer 12 via, for example, text messaging, phone, website, email, and/or the interface 24 of the meter 20 by way of the communication circuitry 26. When a consumer 12 agrees to such a demand response event request, the utility provider 14 may verify subsequent compliance during the demand response event using the demand response event compliance verification system 10. In addition, it should be understood that in some embodiments, a load 18 may include a built-in demand response system, which may automatically respond to a demand response event request from a utility provider 14 by powering the load 18 off or refusing to turn the load 18 on during a demand response event.
Specifically, at least while the demand response event is occurring, the sampling circuitry 22 of power meters 20 of consumers 12 that have agreed with the demand response event request may sample discrete power consumption by the consumers 12 to obtain power usage profiles 28. For example, the sampling circuitry 22 may measure the instantaneous current power consumption or change in power consumption at specific intervals (e.g., every 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, or 30 seconds, or every 1, 2, or 5 minutes, or other such intervals). In at least one embodiment, the sampling circuitry 22 samples the current power consumption of the consumer 12 at an interval long enough to provide privacy, such that relatively low-power-consuming loads 18 generally are not particularly detectable according to the techniques discussed herein, but such that relatively high-power-consuming loads 18 are detectable (e.g., approximately every 5-10 seconds or longer). The power meters 20 may communicate these power usage profiles 28 via the communication circuitry 26. This communication circuitry 26 may include wireless communication circuitry capable of communicating via a network such as a personal area network (PAN) such as a Bluetooth network, a local area network (LAN) such as an 802.11x Wi-Fi network, a wide area network (WAN) such as a 3G or 4G cellular network (e.g., WiMax), and/or a power line data transmission network such as Power Line Communication (PLC) or Power Line Carrier Communication (PLCC).
A compliance server 30 associated with the utility provider 14 may receive the power usage profiles and determine whether the consumers 12 have complied with the demand response event request. Although the compliance server 30 is illustrated as being associated with the utility provider 14, the compliance server 30 may be associated instead with a third party service, or may represent a capability of the power meter 20. The compliance server 30 may include a processor 32, memory 34, and storage 36. The processor 32 may be operably coupled to the memory 34 and/or the storage 36 to carry out the presently disclosed techniques. These techniques may be carried out by the processor 32 and/or other data processing circuitry based on certain instructions executable by the processor 32. Such instructions may be stored using any suitable article of manufacturer, which may include one or more tangible, computer-readable media to at least collectively store these instructions. The article of manufacturer may include, for example, the memory 34 and/or the nonvolatile storage 36. The memory 34 and the nonvolatile storage 36 may include any suitable articles of manufacturer for storing data and executable instructions, such a random-access memory, read-only memory, rewriteable flash memory, hard drives, and optical disks.
Using techniques such as those described herein, the compliance server 30 may compare the power usage profiles 28 received from the power meters 20 with various load profiles, which may be stored in the storage 36 and which may represent patterns of power consumption by certain types of loads 18. If the compliance server 30 determines that a power usage profile 28 matches a load profile associated with the type of load the consumer 12 agreed not to run, the compliance server 30 may output a compliance indication 38 indicating that the consumer 12 has not complied with the demand response event request. If the compliance server 30 does not determine that the power usage profile 28 matches a load profile from the nonvolatile storage 36 that represents a type of device that has been agreed not to be run during a demand response event, the compliance server 30 may output the compliance indication 38 to indicate that the consumer 12 is in compliance with the demand response event request.
The power meters 20 may take a variety of forms. One embodiment of a three-phase power meter 20 appears in
Metering circuitry 60 may ascertain power consumption by monitoring the voltage and current traversing the AC lines 52 to the AC load 12. In particular, voltage sensing circuitry 62 may determine the voltage based on the three phase lines 53 and the neutral line 54. Current transformers (CTs) 64 and current sensing circuitry 66 may determine the current flowing through the three phase lines 53. The metering circuitry 60 may output the current power consumption values to an electronic display 68, such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), as well as to a processor 70. The metering circuitry 60 may sense the voltage and current inputs and send corresponding pulses to the processor 70, which calculates various data relating to the current power consumption of the consumer 12. For example, the processor 70 may calculate the energy accumulation, power factor, active power, reactive power and maximum demand, etc. These various elements may collectively form the sampling circuitry 22 that determines the power usage profile 28 representing power consumption by the consumer 12.
The processor 70 may store the demand details in memory 72 and/or nonvolatile storage 74, which may be NVRAM (EEPROM) or other suitable nonvolatile storage, such as the nonvolatile storage discussed above in relation to the compliance server 30. In certain embodiments, multiple functions of the power meter 20 may be implemented in a single chip solution, in which a single chip performs both the voltage/current sensing and the calculation of demand parameters. From the demand data in the processor 70, the processor 70 may generate the power usage profile 28. Certain audio alerts may be provided by the processor 70 to audio output circuitry 76 and/or 78, which may include a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) and a built-in speaker or external powered speakers connected by the consumer 12. These audio alerts may include, for example, an indication that the utility provider 14 has sent a demand response event request, or a reminder to shut off a load 18 during a demand response event.
The processor 70 may include one or more microprocessors, such as one or more “general-purpose” microprocessors, one or more application-specific processors (ASICs), or a combination of such processing components, which may control the general operation of the power meter 20. For example, the processor 70 may include one or more instruction set processors (e.g., RISC), audio processors, and/or other related chipsets. The memory 72 and the nonvolatile storage 74 may store the current and/or certain historical power consumption values, as well as provide instructions to enable the processor 70 to generate the power usage profile 28.
The processor 70 may be operably coupled to the memory 72 and/or the storage 74 to carry out the presently disclosed techniques. These techniques may be carried out by the processor 70 and/or other data processing circuitry based on certain instructions executable by the processor 70. Such instructions may be stored using any suitable article of manufacturer, which may include one or more tangible, computer-readable media to least collectively store these instructions. The article of manufacturer may include, for example, the memory 72 and/or the nonvolatile storage 74. The memory 72 and the nonvolatile storage 74 may include any suitable articles of manufacturer for storing data and executable instructions, such a random-access memory, read-only memory, rewriteable flash memory, hard drives, and optical disks
To interface with the consumer 12, the processor 70 may cause an indicator light 80 to blink or flash or may display messages on the display 68. By way of example, such a message may include a demand response event request or a reminder to comply with a demand response event request. The consumer 12 may respond by pressing a user pushbutton 82 or via a peripheral device 84, such as a computing device (e.g., computer or portable phone) or an input device (e.g., a keyboard or touch-sensitive screen). These components of the power meter 20, including the display 68 and the audio output circuitry 76 and/or 78, generally may represent the interface circuitry 24 of the power meter 20. The communication circuitry 26 is represented as communication device(s) 86 in
One embodiment of communication 100 that may take place between a consumer 12 and the utility provider 14 appears in
The consumer 12 may accept the offer of the demand response event request of block 102, for example, by interacting with the interface 24 of the power meter 20 or by replying to the text message, phone, email, or website. When the consumer 12 accepts the offer (block 106), an indication of acceptance (block 108) may be sent to the utility provider 14. When the consumer 12 accepts the demand response event request of block 102 by indicating agreement via the interface 24 of the power meter 20, the power meter 20 may transmit the indication of acceptance of block 108 via the communication device(s) 84. When the consumer 12 accepts the demand response event request of block 102 by indicating agreement via a text message, phone, email, a website, etc., the utility provider 14 may communicate to the power meter 20 that the consumer 12 has accepted the demand response event request of block 102.
When the start of the demand response event approaches, the consumer 12 may power down the load 18 per the agreement of the demand response event request (block 110). Thereafter, at least during the demand response event, the power meter 20 may sample consumer 12 power usage to obtain a power usage profile 28 (block 112). The power meter 20 may communicate this power usage profile 28 via the communication network to the compliance server 30 associated with the utility provider 14 (block 114), which may compare the power usage profile 28 to various load profiles (block 116). Since the consumer 12 has powered down the load 18 per the demand response event request agreement, the compliance server 30 will not find a match between the load profiles representing the type of load the consumer 12 agreed not to run and the power usage profile 28, and thus compliance may be verified with a compliance indication 38 (block 118). On the other hand, if the consumer 12 had not powered down the load 18 in block 110, when the power usage profile 28 is compared to the various load profiles in block 116, a match may found and the utility provider 14 may be alerted as to the noncompliance of the consumer 12. Such a situation is described further below.
As noted above, different types of loads 18 typically may consume power according to different patterns. For example, an HVAC system may consume power according to a different pattern than would a clothes dryer, a refrigerator, or an oven.
A plot 130 shown in
A plot 150 shown in
A plot 170 shown in
In addition to consuming power according to a specific pattern, the power consumption patterns of some loads may include a power consumption code identifying the type of load. An embodiment of a load profile associated with such a load 18 appears in a plot 190 of
As noted above, the compliance server 30 may compare a power usage profile 28 measured by a power meter 20 with various load profiles, such as those represented by the plots of
The compliance server 30 may compare the power usage profile 28 to the load profiles after performing certain processing generally isolate the components of the power usage profile due to high-power-consuming loads 18. For example,
Turning to
The plot 210 of
Such a baseline amount of power consumption is represented by a plot 220 of
Since this baseline level of power consumption generally only may reflect power consumed by relatively low-power-consuming loads 18, such a baseline power consumption curve 226 may be subtracted from the power usage profile of power consumption curve 216 of the plot 210 of
In another embodiment, the baseline power consumption of a power usage profile 28 may be determined based on typical power consumption occurring during several different periods prior to the start of a demand response event. For example, as shown by a plot 240 of
If the consumer 12 does accept the demand response event request (decision block 264), the power meter 20 may sample the current power consumption of the consumer 12 to obtain a power usage profile during at least the compliance period of the demand response event (block 270). The power meter 20 may send the power usage profile 28 determined in block 270 to a compliance server 30 associated with the utility provider 14 (block 272). Thereafter, the compliance server 30 may compare the power usage profile to various known application profiles stored in the nonvolatile storage 36, which may indicate the types of loads that the consumer 12 is running (block 274). If a match is found (decision block 276), the consumer 12 may be understood to be in noncompliance with the demand response event request, and a notification indicating such may be sent to the power utility 14 (block 268). On the other hand, if no match is found (decision block 276), and the demand response event has not yet ended (decision block 278), the actions of blocks 270-276 may continue. When the demand response event has ended (decision block 278), the power meter 20 may stop tracking the power usage profile 28 of the consumer 12 (block 280), and a notification indicating that the user remained in compliance during the demand response event may be sent to the power utility 14 (block 268).
At times, when a demand response event is about to occur, a consumer 12 may be temporarily in noncompliance with a demand response event request. For example, a consumer 12 may be running the type of load 18 the consumer 12 agreed not to run during the demand response event), and might otherwise continue to run the load 18 by accident without a reminder. Thus, a flowchart 290 of
The flowchart 290 may begin after a consumer 12 has accepted a demand response event request from a utility provider 14 to shut down a specific type of load during a demand response event (block 292). During some period of time before the demand response event begins, the power meter 20 may sample the power usage profile of the consumer 12 (block 294) and send such power usage profile 28 to the compliance server 30 (block 296). Thereafter, the compliance server 30 may compare the power usage profile to the known load profiles stored in nonvolatile storage 36 associated with the compliance server 30, specifically seeking the type of load 18 that the consumer 12 has agreed not to run during the demand response event (block 298). If a match is not found (decision block 300), the actions of blocks 294-298 may continue until the start of the demand response event. However, if a match is found (decision block 300), indicating that the consumer 12 is currently running the type of load 18 that the consumer 12 agreed not to run (decision block 300), a reminder may be sent to the consumer 12 reminding the consumer 12 to shut down the previously agreed upon load 18 before the start of the demand response event (block 302).
Technical effects of the invention include enabling a manner of detecting compliance with a demand response event request, when a consumer has been requested not to run a specific type of load during periods of peak power consumption. Thus, a utility provider may offer incentives to consumers to refrain from running certain loads (e.g., high-power-consuming appliances) during such periods of peak power consumption, when the strain of such power consumption could result in service interruptions. Additionally, a utility provider may be able to detect the types of loads a consumer has chosen to run at any given point in time according to the techniques discussed above.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4347575 | Gurr et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4858141 | Hart et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5483153 | Leeb et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5696695 | Ehlers et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717325 | Leeb et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6216956 | Ehlers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6860431 | Jayadev | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891478 | Gardner | May 2005 | B2 |
6906617 | Van der Meulen | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7010363 | Donnelly et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7184861 | Petite | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7373222 | Wright et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7379791 | Tamarkin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7409303 | Yeo et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7420293 | Donnelly et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7528503 | Rognli et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7705484 | Horst | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7738999 | Petite | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747357 | Murdoch | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755493 | Berenguer et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7873441 | Synesiou et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8063787 | Parker et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8090480 | Brumfield et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094034 | Patel et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8121737 | West et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8185333 | Jonsson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8290635 | Cohen | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8326551 | Wirt | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20060259201 | Brown | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070018852 | Seitz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043478 | Ehlers et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080015742 | Kulyk et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080255899 | McConnell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090063257 | Zak et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090187499 | Mulder et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198384 | Ahn | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090307178 | Kuhns et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326726 | Ippolito et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030393 | Masters et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070091 | Watson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070103 | Fleck et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070214 | Hyde et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070218 | Hyde et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082174 | Weaver | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088261 | Montalvo | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106342 | Ko et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100217450 | Beal et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100280978 | Shimada et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110004421 | Rosewell et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110046806 | Nagel et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046904 | Souilmi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066300 | Tyagi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110095017 | Steurer | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106328 | Zhou et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112780 | Moss | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114627 | Burt | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153100 | Besore et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153101 | Thomas et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110191220 | Kidston et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110301894 | Sanderford, Jr. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120035778 | Kong | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120078547 | Murdoch | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009103998 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010007369 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010008479 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010030862 | Mar 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hart, G.W.; , “Residential energy monitoring and computerized surveillance via utility power flows,” Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE , vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 12-16, Jun. 1989. |
European Search Report from corresponding EP Application No. 11188866.5-1524 dated Feb. 21, 2012. |
John W M Cheng et al., “Electric-Load Intelligence (E-LI): Concept and Applications”, TENCON 2006 IEEE Region 10 Conference, pp. 1-4, Nov. 1, 2006. |
Najmeddine, H. et al., “State of art on load monitoring methods”, Power and Energy Conference, pp. 1256-1258, Dec. 1, 2008. |
Hsueh-Hsien Chang et al., “Load identification in nonintrusive load monitoring using steady-state and turn-on transient energy algorithms”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), pp. 27-32, Apr. 14, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120123995 A1 | May 2012 | US |