The present invention relates to power systems for use with an electric lock mechanism. More specifically, the invention relates to improved power control systems that afford improved power efficiencies when powering an electric lock mechanism such as an electromagnetic lock system actuated by a motor or solenoid. In one aspect of the invention, the power control system includes an array of resistors coupled to a microcontroller programmed to incorporate a look-up table. The power control system selects a duty ratio to most efficiently power the lock mechanism, depending upon the sensed solenoid current and the associated current values identified in the look-up table. In a further aspect of the present invention, the power control system includes a microcontroller programmed to stagger delivery of operating currents to two or more lock mechanisms so as to reduce the peak current needed from the circuit. In another aspect of the invention, the power control system is configured to turn off power to an electromagnet actuator of the lock mechanism and/or an access credential device when the credential device is not being used to control the lock mechanism. In another aspect of the invention, the power control system is configured to enter a sleep mode during which negligible power is drawn from the AC source.
As is known in the art of access control systems such as door locks, typically an electrically-controlled strike may be mounted in a frame portion of a door to engage a lockset disposed on or in an edge portion of the corresponding door. Typically, the lockset may be a cylindrical-type or mortise-type lockset and includes a latch, and possibly a dead latch. In the case of a mortise-type lockset, the dead latch is linearly spaced apart from the latch along the edge portion of the door. In either lockset type, the latch is reciprocally moveable between an engaged position and released position. When in the engaged position the latch can engage an entry chamber in the strike and thereby secure the door in a closed state. When in the released position, the latch is permitted to exit the entry chamber and to release the door from the closed state and is free to open.
When included, the dead latch is reciprocally moveable between an enabling position (extended) and a disabling position (depressed). The enabling position permits movement of the latch from its engaged position to the released position. The disabling position prohibits movement of the latch from its engaged position to its released position. Typically, the latch is resiliently biased into the engaged position and the dead latch is resiliently biased into the enabled position.
Solenoids are often used as the driver to actuate many types of electromechanical devices, such as for example electromechanical door latches or strikes. In the use of solenoids as drivers in electromechanical door latches or strikes, the solenoids may be spring biased to either a default locked or unlocked state, depending on the intended application of the strike or latch. When power is applied to the solenoid, the solenoid is powered away from the default state to bias a return spring. The solenoid will maintain the bias as long as power is supplied to the solenoid. Once power has been intentionally removed, or otherwise, such as through a power outage from the grid or as a result of a fire, the solenoid returns to its default locked or unlocked state.
In a fail-safe lock system, power is supplied to the solenoid to lock the latch or strike. With power removed, a return spring moves the mechanism to an unlocked state. Thus, as long as the latch or strike remains locked, power has to be supplied to the solenoid to maintain stored energy in the return spring. The power to pull in the plunger of the solenoid is referred to as the “pick” power and the power to hold the plunger in its activated position is referred to as the “hold” power. Typically, the hold current is substantially less than the pick current.
In a fail-secure system, the reverse is true. With power removed, the return spring moves the latching mechanism to a locked state. Thus, as long as the latch remains unlocked, power has to be supplied to the solenoid to maintain stored energy in the return spring. Again, the hold current is substantially less than the pick current.
A system designed to overcome the shortcomings of solenoid lock systems is disclosed in the prior art disclosure from Sargent Manufacturing Company (WO2014/028332—herein referred to as “the '332 publication”), the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. As disclosed in the '332 publication, the solenoid used to drive the door lock mechanism is swapped out for a small DC motor that moves a latching plate. This change, in combination with the motor aligning with and engaging an auger/spring arrangement, reduced standby power consumption of the driver from about 0.5 A to about 15 mA.
International Patent Application, Serial No. PCT/US2014/027050 (herein referred to as “the '050 PCT application”), the relevant disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a circuit, apparatus and method for improving energy efficiency, reducing cost and/or improving quality of electronic locks. The electronic lock controller circuit includes an input for receiving a legacy pulse, a power circuit for extracting power from the legacy pulse to power the electronic lock controller circuit, a detector circuit for detecting a polarity of the legacy pulse and a microcontroller having an output for connection to a lock actuator. The microcontroller sends an output pulse via the output to control the lock actuator and the output pulse having reduced power as compared to the legacy pulse at the input. The power may be reduced by reducing voltage and/or reducing the duration of the voltage pulse.
What is needed in the art is a power control system that operates an actuator-controlled lock mechanism, which can achieve improved power efficiencies, such as through entering a low-power state when actuation is not required, sensing and compensating for actuators having different power profiles by providing the optimum power needed to activate the particular actuator, and staggering power output to multiple doors during simultaneous activation.
Briefly described, the present invention is directed to a power control system for use with an electric lock mechanism having an actuator comprising a power supply configured to output a output voltage to the actuator, A credential device is powered by the power supply and is configured to signal the power control system to supply the output voltage upon receiving an authorized access code. A microcontroller monitors and controls the power supply, the credential device, and the actuator. The microcontroller may be selectively configured to operate in either an Access Mode or a Dog Mode. In the Access Mode, the actuator is in an unpowered state and the credential device is in a powered state such that upon receiving the authorized access code, the power control system supplies the output voltage to place the actuator in a powered state. When the batteries are sufficiently charged, the control system enters a sleep mode during which power drawn from the AC source is negligible. In the Dog Mode, the actuator is in a powered state and the credential device is placed in an unpowered state after the actuator remains in the powered state for a predetermined length of time. The predetermined period of time may be about 120 seconds. Power to the actuator device while in the sleep mode may be provided by a battery.
In a further aspect of the present invention, a power control system for use with an electric lock mechanism having an actuator comprises a power supply configured to output a drive current to the actuator. A credential device is powered by the power supply and is configured to signal the power control system to supply the output voltage upon receiving an authorized access code. A microcontroller monitors and controls the power supply, the credential device, the actuator driver, and the actuator. The microcontroller is populated with a look-up table of performance data for a plurality of actuator types such that the microcontroller selects a duty ratio to establish the drive current for a sensed actuator. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the actuator may be a solenoid and the drive current may have a first pick-current component and a second hold-current component.
In still a further aspect of the present invention, a power control system for use with two or more electric lock mechanisms, each having a respective actuator, comprises a power supply configured to output a voltage to each respective actuator. A respective credential device is coupled to each electric lock mechanism and is powered by the power supply. Each respective credential device is configured to signal the power control system to supply the output voltage upon receiving a valid access-code. A microcontroller monitors and controls the power supply, each respective credential device, and each respective actuator. In the event two or more of the credential devices signal the power supply at the same time, the microcontroller instructs the power control system to supply to sequentially the output voltage to successive actuators. The credential code may be a fire alarm signal and at least one of the actuators may be a solenoid. The output voltage may have a first pick-current component and a second hold-current component—the pick-current component being greater in magnitude than the hold-current component. The microcontroller may instruct the power control system to supply the output voltage to the next successive actuator after the output voltage begins to provide the second hold-current component.
Numerous applications, some of which are exemplarily described below, may be implemented using the present invention.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a-2j is a composite block diagram of a power control system, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate currently preferred embodiments of the present invention, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Referring to
Operational control of the power supply 20, actuator 10, and credential device 22 may be provided via a power control system including a programmed microcontroller. With reference to
In one aspect of the invention, power supply 20 may be selected to output either 24VDC or 12VDC or both, which is supplied by a voltage source 38 (100VAC-240VAC). Power supply 20 may by a two-switch forward converter operating at a pulse-width modulation (PWM) switching rate of 100 kHz or higher. The power control system 30 may indicate the presence of AC voltage through the implementation of an isolator 40 that provides an AC present signal to microcontroller 32. The control system 30 may also indicate the status of AC presence along with various under-voltage, over-voltage, under-current, and over-current conditions, such as through LED outputs 94. These voltage and current conditions include those of, but are not limited to, the actuators, the credential devices, the auxiliary output, the battery charger, and the battery. Furthermore, the voltages and currents of the power control system 30 may also be monitored by microcontroller 32 through voltage and current sensors 44 and 46, respectively.
Power control system 30 may also include batteries 34, 36 to provide the necessary power when power supply 20 is no longer receiving adequate AC source voltage (for instance, during a line voltage interruption or unavailability that may occur through a general power outage or power disruption due to a fire). The power supply 20 may be turned off by signal ECO_PWR 42 which also operates the BYPASS relay 48 to allow either 24V battery 34 or 12V battery 36 to provide the requisite DC voltage to system 30, depending upon the current needs, the battery state-of-charge, or specifications of the power control system 30. To maintain battery charge status, power control system 30 may include battery charger 50 which employ switching regulators to provide the appropriate charging voltages and currents to their respective batteries when AC power is present. If a power failure is detected by microcontroller 32, charger 50 is bypassed by relay 48 and battery current is in turn diverted to actuator drivers 26 and 28 and microcontroller 32. Battery voltages are monitored by microcontroller 32 such that, if a battery voltage falls below a predetermined cut-off threshold, microcontroller 32 dis-engages a relay 52 to disconnect the battery from the circuit.
One or more actuator drivers 26, 28 may be under the control of microcontroller 32 so as to selectively enable activation of a respective actuator 10 upon receiving a drive signal from power supply 20.
As shown in
Signals that engage actuators 10a and 10b, along with the fire alarm input 58 (
As is acknowledged in the art, solenoid driven actuators have long been known for their power inefficiencies. First, it is known that their pull-in current (pick current) is higher than the current needed to hold the solenoid plunger in place (hold current). Therefore, at a minimum, to save energy, the controller should step down the current after a fixed duration of time following application of the pick current. Second, in a Fail-Secure system, the solenoid is often under a power mode as long as the door must remain unlocked. In a Fail-Safe system, the solenoid is in a power mode for as long as the door must remain locked. Thus, in Fail-Safe systems, without further controls, a large amount of power can be wasted while the solenoid remains powered. To that end, microcontroller 32 includes a timer such that, upon signaling solenoid driver 26/28, microcontroller 32 starts a time interval during which a constant voltage is supplied to drive the solenoid. When this time interval expires, micro-controller 32 provides a PWM drive signal of such duty ratio as to cause the hold current to flow through the solenoid coil. To ensure proper operation, at start-up or reset, the microcontroller reads the status of switch settings that establishes the hold-open time intervals, the actuator modes, and the solenoid hold currents. Switch settings and corresponding time intervals are listed in Table 2.
Apart from, and in addition to, stepping down the supplied power during pick and hold operations, a further avenue for improving efficiencies when powering a solenoid latch is optimizing the magnitude of the current being supplied to the solenoid during each of the pick and hold operations. Thus, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, firmware (not shown) in microcontroller 32 may include a self-calibration routine that accommodates varieties of solenoid coil impedances. This routine may use motor driver 26 outputs to momentarily switch a pulse of current through the solenoid coil (actuator 10a or 10b). The current response is related to the inductance and resistance of the actuator 10a or 10b.
As shown in
As shown in
Driver circuit 70 may also include a current-sense amplifier 80, which has two gain resistors 82a and 82b that are used to sense the two components of the load current; the first in primary switch 74 and the second in secondary switch 76. Current sense resistor 86 is connected to primary switch 74 and secondary switch 76. The voltage across current-sense resistor 86 is amplified by current-sense amplifier 80 to provide an analog voltage to micro-controller 32. During the pulse-current test (described above), microcontroller 32 may measure the output voltage of current-sense amplifier 80 at observation time t. As discussed above, this voltage, which is proportional to coil current, is compared to a table of values to determine the coil type. Once the type of solenoid coil is established, microcontroller 32 determines the required duty ratio to establish the optimum pull-in (pick) current and hold current for that specific solenoid.
Turning now to
By way of example,
In another embodiment of the present invention, microcontroller 32 may further include access/dog switch inputs 90 and 92 (
In this embodiment, Access/Dog inputs 90 and 92, along with the actuator inputs 60 and 62, comprise the access inputs of power control system 30. When active, inputs 60, 62 and 90, 92 initiate the process of an access request which engages or enables outputs 64, 66, which are operatively connected to corresponding actuators. Access control logic is summarized in Table 3 below. Outputs OUT #1 and OUT #2 are for actuators 10a and 10b. Outputs CRED #1 and CRED #2 are for credential devices 22a and 22b. Generally, when in the Access Mode, both credential devices are enabled and the actuators are engaged by their respective inputs. In the Dog Mode, the credential devices are de-activated to reduce energy consumption.
By way of example, power control system 30 may be configured to operate in either an Access Mode or in a Dog Mode for a fail-secure system. When in the Access Mode, the actuators 10a and 10b are selected to operate in fail-secure mode. In this manner, when the actuators are de-energized, the latch remains engaged with the strike to secure the door, gate, etc. Additionally, credential devices 22a and 22b are active and using battery power. Thus, power supply is substantially limited only to that required to maintain battery charge. When an access code is entered at credential device 22a or 22b (such as through a keypad, fob, or key card), power control system 30 awakens and energizes actuators 10a and 10b thereby allowing for the withdrawal of the latch. In this manner, roughly 97% of the time, power control system 30 is idle and consuming less than about 100 mW. The remaining roughly 3% of the time requires about 15 W (motors) to about 23 W (solenoids) of power from power control system 30 to actuate actuators 10a and/or 10b. As a result, this power control scheme may equate to greater than 90% energy savings versus existing power supplies.
Power control system 30 may alternatively operate in a Dog Mode for a fail-secure system. During daytime/energized hours, when access is permitted (awake mode), the power control system 30 is awake and power is supplied to actuators 10a, 10b. Credential devices 22a, 22b are unpowered as access is readily permitted and door access does not require any authorization through credential devices 22a and 22b. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, power control system 30 may automatically enter into its daytime/energized hours mode after power control system 30 senses that the latch has been unlocked (or actuator 10a, 10b has held the respective latch open) for greater than a predetermined period of time, such as, but not limited to, approximately 60 seconds. Conversely, in the Dog Mode when access is not expected (sleep mode), power control system 30 is placed in sleep mode and credential devices 22a, 22b are active and running on battery power. As a result, power output from power supply 20 is limited to only that required to maintain battery charge. In this manner, operating power control system 30 in Dog Mode offers approximately 40% energy savings when compared to current power supply systems.
In accordance with the embodiments of the present invention, and referring again to
TAG connector input 98 may be an interface through which the microcontroller can be programmed. The serial port 102 may facilitate firmware debugging. Microcontroller reset 104 may be provided with a push-button switch that allows system users to reset the microcontroller. Fire alarm reset input may be provided with a push-button switch to allow users to reset the fire alarm. The fire alarm reset switch may be connected in parallel with a possible external fire alarm reset switch.
While the invention has been described by reference to various specific embodiments, it should be understood that numerous changes may be made within the spirit and scope of the inventive concepts described. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but will have full scope defined by the language of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/098,484, filed Apr. 14, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/147,490, filed Apr. 14, 2015, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4594637 | Falk | Jun 1986 | A |
4967305 | Murrer et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5140173 | Chau et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5751532 | Kanuchok et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757605 | Furukawa | May 1998 | A |
5894277 | Keskin et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5987818 | Dabideen | Nov 1999 | A |
6021038 | Hanchett, Jr. | Feb 2000 | A |
7330344 | Gaessler et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7683604 | Steele | Mar 2010 | B1 |
9447609 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20010030589 | Dahlgren et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20070176775 | White | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070242408 | Bergstrom et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090052107 | Maclennan | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090085717 | Kirkjan | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20130305353 | McMillan | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140062539 | Buthker et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150109104 | Fadell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129344 | Nehls et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150311778 | Chang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160020632 | Lickfelt et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160053514 | Savage et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160133071 | Henderson | May 2016 | A1 |
20160145898 | Ohl et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160145901 | Levy | May 2016 | A1 |
20160215524 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1452879 | Sep 2010 | EP |
WO2014028332 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO2014152187 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Oprea, Karen, Office Action, Canadian Patent Application No. 2,926,929, Apr. 25, 2022, 4 pages, Quebec, Canada. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210010294 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62147490 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15098484 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 17036102 | US |