The present invention relates to a power conversion system particularly, though not exclusively, adapted to provide continuous power to single or multiple phase AC loads when fed from separate DC and single or multiple phase AC sources. The invention further relates to a method of converting power.
Many “Alternative” Energy Sources (AES), such as photovoltaic (PV) modules, produce maximum power at a DC output voltage that varies widely depending upon the solar insolation levels, ambient temperature and other variables. Wind energy, which is often extracted to a DC output using a wind generator (WG) with a rectifier, generally also requires a variable output voltage to extract the maximum power at any given time or wind speed. It is important to operate a PV or WG system at the DC voltage at which maximum power is obtained from these sources, so as to obtain the maximum benefit from the equipment capital expenditure. Since the DC voltage must vary, some form of power conversion is required to transfer energy from the source to a battery whose voltage is independently determined. Typically, a charge controller is used to transfer power from the PV or WG to a battery in a parallel configuration. The power from the battery is then converted to AC using an inverter to energise AC loads.
Referring to
Power conversion systems are often manifested UPS systems. Recently, the application of PV assisted UPS systems for poor quality utility power grids has been reported, where a bi-directional inverter is used in an “in-line” configuration as shown in
This system consists essentially of three energy sources (where a source could be a load, or negative source). The first is the DC source S itself, which supplies energy when available. The second is the battery 14, which acts as energy storage, accepting energy from the source S or the AC grid 20 at certain periods of time, and supplying energy to the AC grid 20 when energy is not available from the DC source S. The third energy source is the AC grid 20 itself, which could accept energy from the DC source S or the battery 14, or provide energy either to charge the battery 14 or supply loads 18.
In this system, a topological arrangement of power conversion equipment is required to provide all possible power flow requirements as efficiently as possible with the lowest aggregate converter power rating.
A single conversion between each of the three sources would have the greatest efficiency, since only one converter would be required for each conversion. However, this would require three converters, each with full power rating.
Throughout this specification and claims the terms “converter”, “rectifier”, “inverter” and “battery” are intended to have the following meaning, unless from the context of their use it is clearly apparent that an alternate meaning is intended:
It is an object of the present invention to provide a power conversion system having a plurality of converters with reduced aggregate power rating of the converters while still providing all power flow requirements, maintaining high overall efficiency and power factor.
According to the present invention there is provided a power conversion system including at least:
In one embodiment, said second converter is an inverter. However, in an alternative embodiment, said second converter is a bi-directional inverter.
In one embodiment, said first converter is an inverter. However, in an alternative embodiment, said first converter is a bi-directional inverter.
In one embodiment, the AC sides of said first and second converters are connected together in parallel. In an alternative embodiment, when said power conversion system is coupled between a DC power source, an AC grid and an AC load; the AC side of said second converter is connected to said AC grid, and the AC side of said first converter is connected to said AC load, with a coupling inductor placed between said AC grid and said AC load, and said DC power source connected across the DC sides of said first and second converters.
Preferably said electrical energy storage device is connected in parallel across the DC side of said first converter.
Preferably each of said first and second converters are in the form of any one of: single phase full bridge converter, a single phase half bridge converter, a three phase converter with three half-bridges, a phase shifted converter, a switch mode converter, and a voltage source inverter.
Preferably said electrical energy storage device includes a battery; or an alternate energy source with energy storage properties, such as, but not limited to, a fuel cell; or a combination of at least one battery and at least one alternate energy source with energy storage properties. Such options provide for a bi-directional or mono-directional energy storage with the ability for the alternate energy source to act as a fuel cell.
The present invention further provides an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) including at least:
Preferably said AC load and AC grid are either tied directly together or with a coupling inductor between them.
Preferably said DC source provides energy at a variable voltage.
Preferably said DC source is an alternative energy source.
The invention further provides a method for converting power between a DC power source and an AC system including the steps of:
Preferably the step of providing an electrical energy storage deviec includes providing a battery; or an alternate energy source with energy storage properties, such as, but not limited to, a fuel cell; or a combination of at least one battery and at least one alternate energy source with energy storage properties. When such a combination is provided the energy storage device can be bi-directional or mono-directional.
Preferably the step of connecting the AC sides of said first and second converters together in parallel includes connecting said AC sides either directly or with a coupling inductor between them.
Preferably said method includes the step of controlling real power flow of said second converter so as to regulate the DC voltage or DC current of said DC power source to thereby provide for maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of said DC power source.
Preferably said method includes the step of controlling real power flow of said second converter to regulate the amount of energy delivered to or from said electrical energy storage device.
Preferably said method further includes the step of controlling real power flow of said second converter to regulate the amount of energy delivered from said DC power source.
Preferably said method further includes the step of controlling reactive power flow of either or both of said first or second converters to achieve a desired power quality on the AC side.
Preferably, when said AC system includes an AC load and a parallel coupled AC grid, said method further includes the step of controlling reactive power flow of either of said first or second converters to regulate the power factor of said AC grid.
Preferably said method further includes the step of connecting a coupling inductor between said load and said AC grid.
Preferably said system further includes a step of controlling the real power flow of either of said first or second converters so as to regulate the AC load voltage magnitude or wave form.
Preferably said method further includes the step of controlling the reactive power flow of either of said first or second converters so as to regulate the AC load voltage magnitude or wave form.
Preferably said method further includes the step of controlling the harmonic power flow of either of said first or second converters so as to regulate the AC load voltage magnitude or wave form.
Preferably said method further includes the step of controlling reactive power flow of either of said first or second converters to provide active VAR compensation for said AC grid.
Preferably said method further includes the step of controlling harmonic power flow of either of said first or second converters to provide active cancellation of current harmonics of said AC system.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
a is a block diagram of an embodiment of the present power conversion system;
b is a schematic representation of a first embodiment of a power conversion system in accordance with the present invention;
c is a schematic representation of another embodiment of a power conversion system in accordance with the present invention;
a is a phasor diagram of the converter shown in
b is a diagrammatic representation of the grid active and reactive power coupling as a function of grid voltage for the power conversion system shown in
c is a diagrammatic representation of the grid active power in terms of phase angle between load and grid voltages;
d is a diagrammatic representation of the grid reactive power in terms of phase angle;
f is a diagrammatic representation of the grid power factor in terms of phase angle;
g is a diagrammatic representation of the coupling inductor reactive power consumption in terms of phase angle;
a is a schematic circuit diagram of system depicted in
b is a simplified equivalent circuit of the system shown in
c is a diagrammatic representation of the grid power factor improvement by the use of an embodiment of the power conversion system;
a is simulation result of the currents, voltages and power flow within the power conversion system shown in
b is simulation result of the current, voltage and power flow within the system show in
a is a simplified equivalent circuit of the system configuration shown in
b is a simplified equivalent circuit of the system configuration shown in
Referring in particular to
In each of these embodiments, both of the converters C1 and C2 are bi directional although in an alternate embodiment, the converter C2 may be in the form of an inverter providing power conversion from DC to AC only. Of course this may also be manifested by forming the converter C2 as a bi directional converter but operating it only in an inverter mode.
The DC sides 26 and 40 of the converters C1 and C2 are connected in series and have, applied across them, i.e. across lines 28 and 42, DC voltage source S typically from an alternate energy source such as a photovoltaic panel, wind generator or the like. The voltage produced by the DC power source is represented as voltage VpS.
In the embodiment depicted in
In the embodiment depicted in
An energy storage device such as a battery 50 is coupled in series with the DC side 40 of the converter C2 and in parallel with the DC side 26 of the converter C1. It should be noted however that the energy storage device may include a battery 50 (or plurality of batteries) per se, or a further alternate energy source 51 (also shown in
As explained in greater detail below, the converter C2 can control the voltage difference between the battery 50 and the voltage source S and thus provide maximum power point tracking (MPPT) for the source S. While this could be achieved using AC current control as the inner most control, any method resulting in effective power flow control would be appropriate. The power flow in the converter C2 is controlled to either control the battery 50 energy flow, or to provide an AC source of power for the AC system 60.
It is important to note that the specific form or configuration of the converters C1 and C2 are not critical to the operation of embodiments of the present invention. Rather, it is the relative connection of the converters C1 and C2 which provides the beneficial effects of embodiments of the present invention.
The power flow capabilities of the power conversion system 22 are illustrated most clearly in
The power flow requirements listed above can be met with the system 22 in the following manner:
A portion of the source S power can be delivered directly to the battery 50, where that portion is the source S power times the battery voltage Vbat divided by source voltage VpS. The remainder of the source S power can also be delivered to the battery 50 by routing the power out the converter C2 to the AC system 60, and then rectifying it back into the battery through the converter C1. Some or all of the source S power can be delivered directly to the AC system 60 using both converters C1, C2 operating in inverter mode. The power flow from the converter C1 onto the AC system 60 will take away from the power delivered to the battery 50.
The converter C2 can be controlled so as to maintain the source S at the maximum power point voltage and current.
The converter C1 can operate in rectifying mode to charge the battery 50 from the AC grid 20 through the coupling inductor Xs, regardless of how the converter C2 is being controlled. In this case, the power from the AC grid 20 and the portion of power from the source S will add as power in to the battery 50.
Either converter C1, C2 can operate with reactive power independent of the real power flow. Hence the system 22 power factor can be fully controlled. Also, with inductor Xs in place between the system 22 and AC grid 20, the AC load voltage can be regulated by controlling the reactive current.
The two converters C1, C2 can operate together to provide uninterruptible power supply from the source S and/or battery 50 at constant high quality AC voltage when the AC grid 20 is not able to supply power satisfactorily (UPS operation).
When the AC grid 20 is connected, either converter C1, C2 could operate to provide active power filtering of harmonic currents drawn from the AC grid 20 by the AC load 18.
When operating without the AC grid 20, at least one of the converters C1, C2 should operate in AC voltage control mode to produce the required AC voltage to feed the AC load 18. Preferably, both converters C1, C2 are operated in parallel in AC voltage control mode.
With this topological configuration, most power conversions are handled with a single conversion. The only case that requires a double conversion is when all of source S power is supplied to the battery 50. In this case, that power which is provided to the AC grid 20 by the converter C2 must be rectified back through the converter C1 into the battery 50. This represents a circulation of a small portion of the power through two conversions, while much of the power is fed directly into the battery 50 without any conversion.
The control of the power flow in the converter C2 is manifested as both the control of the AC current, and the control of the DC current, both at instantaneously fixed voltages. The DC voltages are controlled over a longer time period through the control of the power flow and the resulting variance in the dc capacitor voltages.
The converter C1 should be sized for the greatest of:
The converter C2 should be sized for the maximum source S current and a voltage range from a minimum value to the minimum plus the required difference from minimum to maximum MPPT DC voltages.
For example, if the source S is a photovoltaic array with a required MPPT voltage range of from 120 to 160 volts, the lower converter C1 and battery 50 may have a DC voltage of 100 volts, and the converter C2 may be designed to vary between 20 volts and 60 volts DC. Hence inverter power ratings would be PDCmax×60V/160V for the converter C2, and be PDCmax×100V/120V for the converter C1 (assuming the converter C2 maximum power requirement is determined from point (b) above). This would give an aggregate converter power rating of 121% of PDCmax.
As previously mentioned, each of the converters C1, C2 could be any type of AC-DC power converter with the specified power flow capability including half bridge converters, phase shifted converters, and any other AC-DC converter. Further, any control mechanism could be used in either of the converters C1, C2 including, but not limited to, bipolar pulse with modulation (PWM) or unipolar PWM with voltage modulation techniques such as space vector modulation, or current modulation techniques such as hysteresis or ramptime current control.
Methods of operation and control of the converter C1 will now be described with reference to
The output voltage V1 of converter C1 has a predominant sinusoidal fundamental component used for power flow. The SPI with full-bridge SMC is able to act as an inverter or a rectifier, as shown in
A simplified equivalent circuit diagram for converter C1 connected to grid 20 through coupling inductor Xs is shown in
Referring to the phasor diagram of the converter C1 coupled to the grid 20 in
P1=V1.I1.Cos(α) (1)
Where
These equations show that the power produced through the converter C1 is dependent on the magnitude of the grid voltage relative to the magnitude of the output voltage of the converter C1, and the phase angle between them. The power flow between the AC grid 20 and the converter C1 can be controlled by varying the phase angle between them. Also, the reactive power flow between the AC grid 20 and the converter C1 can also be controlled by controlling the output voltage and phase angle of each converter.
The converter C2 can be modelled as current controlled source in parallel with the grid 20. Since converter C2 is directly connected to the AC grid 20 as shown in
The active and reactive power flow from the grid toward the converter C1 can be calculated on a per unit basis in accordance with equation (6).
The variation of reactive power in reference to active power at different per unit grid voltages can be calculated or modeled in accordance with equation (7) below and represented graphically in
P2P.U2+(VgP.U2−Q2P.U)2=VgP.U2 (7)
The range of power angle variation is a major factor for choosing the right size of the decoupling inductor XS. The power angle (δ) variation is usually limited to less than 30 degrees. The variation of import/export of active Pgpu and reactive power Qgpu from the grid at different power angles is shown in
Where
Another way of controlling the power flow in either converter C1, C2 when connected with the AC 20 grid is to switch the switches of the converters C1, C2 so as to directly control the AC current in the AC side inductor. One such method is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,801,517 the contents of which are incorporated herein by way of reference. The converters essentially become an AC current source, with the magnitude and phase of the current being controlled relative to the AC grid voltage. In this way, the real and reactive power flow can be independently controlled. Furthermore, the harmonic content of the current waveform can also be controlled.
The power flow in converter C2 as depicted in
When the system 22 is required to operate stand-alone, without the presence of the AC grid 20, or if the AC grid 20 is particularly weak, it is necessary to operate one or both of the converters C1, C2 in AC voltage source mode. In this case, anticipating non-linear local AC loads, the converters must produce a sinusoidal AC voltage at the fundamental frequency (50 or 60 Hz) while producing non-sinusoidal currents. This is the normal operation of stand-alone voltage-source inverters.
As mentioned previously, each converter could be operated with any of a number of different control techniques to produce the required power flow. The three most likely control techniques are voltage phase and amplitude control, or direct current control when grid connected, or AC voltage source operation when operating stand-alone, as described above, but other techniques can be used to achieve the desired power flow. In an optimum implementation of this system 22, the control technique would be selected so as to optimise the immediate power flow objectives.
a depicts, an embodiment of the system 22 is particularly useful to provide power-conditioning in weak grids 20 which suffer from power quality issues such as power interruption, sustained under/over voltage and poor power factor.
The different functions of the system 22 in this configuration can be expressed as:
As the converters C1, C2 are in series on the DC side, the total voltage of source S is shared between them. The source S power is split between the two converters proportional to the respective dc voltages of the two converters. Since the battery is directly connected to the DC side of the converter C1, that portion of the source S power can be delivered to the battery with no conversion losses. The power delivered to the converter C2 must be delivered to the AC side, and can then be routed back through the converter C1 to the battery 50, if desired (if operating stand-alone, with no ac loads). In this mode, equation (11) describes the total efficiency of the MPPT for charging the battery at stand-alone.
where in steady state and no load Ibat=IPS=I2, thus:
As shown in
In the dual converter topology of the system 22, the converter C2 (in current control mode) can provide the reactive power required for operation of the system 22 at unity power factor. In an example case, the source S voltage is set at 160% of Vbat, leaving the DC voltage across the converter C2 at 60% of Vbat. Referring to
As an example the simulation of a system (consisting of a power supply S comprising 16 PV panels (80 W) at 80V with Vbat=48V and S=5 KVA) confirms the validity of the proposed concept and hardware (
The efficiency of the preferred implementation of the system 22 and power conditioner 66 operating in different modes will now be examined. In the following analysis, of all of the following possible modes of operation, the voltage and frequency of the load 18 is assumed constant. Hence, the following results demonstrate the steady-state condition of system 22 in each mode of operation.
With the active and reactive power of the whole system balanced through the proposed power conditioner 66, the following conditions can be provided:
Based on the possible power flows through the circuit branches as shown in
decreases, the overall efficiency of the system will improve. The controller Xs can be configured to minimize the voltage V1 wherever possible, given other system requirements. For example, the maximum power point tracking algorithm should work based on maximizing delivered power rather than maximizing the actual power produced by the photovoltaic panel PV.
* Can be happened in Grid connected mode as well
** In low radiation level we chose this mode of operation to reduce the losses
Y Yes (available)
N No (unavailable)
+ Exist in the same direction
− Exist in the opposite direction
0 Does not exist
Important note, refer to the relevant section
1. Grid 20→Load 18
In this mode the grid 20 alone provides the required power for the load 18. Moreover, the battery 50 need not be discharged during this mode of operation. For instance, when the PV is not available, the load 18 can be fed via the grid at high power quality. The efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
2. Grid 20→Battery 50
In this mode, the grid 20 alone provides the required power for charging the battery 50. For instance, when the Source S is not available and ignoring the local AC load 18, the efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
where:
PBat.=ηBat.Cη1.Pg
Thus the system operates at an efficiency of 73.6%.
3. Source S→Battery 50
In this mode, the PV alone provides the required power for charging the battery 50 at the Maximum Power Point (MPP). The MPP can be obtained by adjusting the converter C2 voltage V2. This situation can occur, for example, when the Source S is available and load is not present and also the battery 50 is not full charged.
For proper system operation a power loop between converters C1 and C2 is required. But in this case because of MPPT we can not reduce V2.
The efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
where:
Ploss2=V2.IPS(1−η2), Ploss1=V2.IPSη2(1−η1),
Ploss=Ploss1+hd loss2
Thus the system operates at efficiency more than 75.02%.
4. Source S→Load 18
In this mode, the PV alone provides the required power for feeding the AC load 18 at MPP. The MPP can be obtained by adjusting the converter C2 voltage V2. This situation can occur, for example, when the SOURCE S is available and can produce more power the load 18 demands.
The efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
where:
Pload=P1ac+P2ac, P2ac=η2.P2dc, P1ac=η1.P1dc
Thus the system operates at an efficiency of 90%.
5. Battery 50→Load 18
In this mode, the battery 50 alone provides the required power for feeding the load 18. This situation can occur, for example, when the Source S and AC grid 20 are not available and the battery 50 can produce more power than the load 18 demands.
The efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
where:
P1ac=Pload, P1dc=η1.P1ac, P1dc=ηBat.DPBat.
Thus the system operates at an efficiency of 82.8%.
6. Source S & Battery 50→Load 18
In this mode, the SOURCE S and battery 50 provide the required power for feeding the load at MPP. The MPP can be obtained by adjusting the converter C2 voltage V2. This situation can occur, for example, when the Source S is available but cannot alone produce the required power for load 18.
The efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
where:
Pload=P1ac+P2ac, P2ac=η2.P2dc, P1ac=P1dc.η1, P1dc=VBat.(Is+ηBat.D.IBat.)η1
The system operates at an efficiency between 82.8 to 90% (Note: for
this efficiency will slightly decrease).
7. AC Grid 20 & Battery 50→Load 18
In this mode, the battery 50 and grid 20 provide the required power for feeding the load 18. This situation can occur, for example, when the source S is not available and the battery 50 alone cannot produce the required power for the load 18.
The efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
where:
Pload=Pg+P1ac, P1ac=η1.P1dc, P1dc=ηBat.D.PBat.
Thus the system operates at an efficiency between 82.8% and 100%.
8. AC Grid 20 & Source S→Load 18
In this mode, the Source S and the AC grid 20 provide the required power for feeding the load 18 at MPP. The MPP can be obtained by adjusting the converter C2 voltage V2. This situation can occur, for example, when the Source S is available but cannot alone produce the required power for load 18.
The efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
where:
Pload=Pg+P2ac+P1ac, P1ac=η1.P1dc, P2ac=η2.P2dc
In this mode, the SOURCE S, the AC grid 20 and battery 50 provide the required power for feeding the load 18 at MPP. The MPP can be obtained by adjusting the converter C2 voltage V2. This situation can occur, for example, when the Source S is available but cannot produce the required power for the load 18 even with AC grid 20 support.
The efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
where:
Pload=P1ac+P2ac+Pg, P2ac=η2.P2dc, P1ac=P1dc.η1
The system operates at an efficiency between 82.8% and 100%.
10. Source S→Load 18 & Battery 50
In this mode, the Source S alone provides the required power for feeding the load 18 and for charging the battery 50 at MPP. The MPP can be obtained by adjusting the converter C2 voltage V2. This situation can occur, for example, when the Source S is available and can produce the required power.
If PBat.>Pload, the difference in power will need to be looped through converter C2 and then rectified back through converter C1.
The efficiency of the whole system in this condition is:
where:
PAES=PBat.+P1dc+P2dc, P1ac=η1.P1dc, P2ac=η2.PBat.
Pload=P2ac+P1ac
Thus the system operates at an efficiency between 75.02% and 90%.
11. AC Grid 20→Load 18 & Battery 50
This mode is similar to mode 2 except that the AC grid 20 also has to provide load 18 power. The system 22 operates at an efficiency between 73.6% and 100% depending on how much energy is required for charging the battery 50.
12. Source S→AC Grid 20
This mode is similar to mode 4 except that the Source S power is supplied to the AC grid 20 in the absence of a local AC load 18. The system 22 operates at an efficiency of 90%.
13. Battery 50→AC Grid 20
This mode is similar to mode 5 except that the battery 50 provides power to the AC grid 20 in the absence of a local AC load 18. The system 22 operates at an efficiency of 82.8%.
14. Source S & Battery 50→Grid 20
This mode is similar to mode 6 except that both the Source S and the battery 50 provide power to the AC grid 20 in the absence of a local AC load 18. The system 22 operates at an efficiency between 82.8 to 90% (Note: for
this efficiency will slightly decrease).
15. Battery 50→Load 18 & Grid 20
This mode is similar to mode 13 except that part of the battery 50 power is provided to the load 18 and the rest to the AC grid 20. The system 22 operates at an efficiency of 82.8%.
16. Source S→Load 18 & Grid 20
This mode is similar to mode 12 except that part of the source S power is provided to the load 18 and the rest to the AC grid 20. The system 22 operates at an efficiency of 90%.
17. Source S & Battery 50→Load 18 & Grid 20
This mode is similar to mode except that part of the source S and battery power 50 is provided to the load 18 and the rest to the grid 20. The system 22 operates at an efficiency between 82.8 to 90% (Note: for
this efficiency will slightly decrease).
18. Source S→Battery 50 & Load 18 & Grid 20
This mode is similar to mode 10 except that the source S power is provided to the load 18, the battery 50, and the grid 20.
If PBat.>→PloadPg, the difference in power will need to be looped through converter C2 and then rectified back through converter C1. Thus the system 22 operates at an efficiency between 75.02% and 90%.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PR 1439 | Mar 2002 | AU | national |
This application is a continuation of PCT/AU03/00382, filed Mar. 28, 2003, and titled “Power Conversion System and Method of Converting Power,” which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to Australian Application No. PS 1439, filed on Mar. 28, 2002, and titled “Power Conversion System and Method of Converting Power,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/AU03/00382 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10950575 | Sep 2004 | US |