The present invention is directed, in general, to power electronics and, more specifically, to a power converter including a power switch, a controller for controlling a switching frequency thereof, and a magnetic device with a non-uniform gap.
A switched-mode power converter (also referred to as a “power converter” or “regulator”) is a power supply or power processing circuit that converts an input voltage waveform into a specified output voltage waveform. DC-DC power converters convert a direct current (“dc”) input voltage into a dc output voltage. Controllers associated with the power converters manage an operation thereof by controlling conduction periods of power switches employed therein. Generally, the controllers are coupled between an input and output of the power converter in a feedback loop configuration (also referred to as a “control loop” or “closed control loop”).
Typically, the controller measures an output characteristic (e.g., an output voltage, an output current, or a combination of an output voltage and an output current) of the power converter, and based thereon modifies a duty cycle of a power switch of the power converter. The duty cycle “D” is a ratio represented by a conduction period of a power switch to a switching period thereof. Thus, if a power switch conducts for half of the switching period, the duty cycle for the power switch would be 0.5 (or 50 percent). Additionally, as the voltage or the current for systems, such as a microprocessor powered by the power converter, dynamically change (e.g., as a computational load on the microprocessor changes), the controller should be configured to dynamically increase or decrease the duty cycle of the power switches therein to maintain an output characteristic such as an output voltage at a desired value.
Power converters designed to operate at low power levels typically employ a flyback power train topology to achieve low manufacturing cost. A power converter with a low power rating designed to convert an ac mains voltage to a regulated dc output voltage to power an electronic load such as a printer, modem, or personal computer is generally referred to as a “power adapter” or an “ac adapter.” Some power adapters may be required to provide short-term peaks of power that are much greater than a nominal operating power level. A power adapter with a nominal 25 watt output power rating may be required to produce 60 watts of peak output power for a relatively small fraction of an operational cycle of the load, for example, for 40 milliseconds (“ms”) out of a 240 millisecond operational cycle of the load.
A component of the magnetic flux in a magnetic device, such as a power transformer (also referred to as a “transformer”), in certain power train topologies employed in a power converter is proportional to a peak operating current in a primary winding thereof. Accordingly, the magnetic device in power adapters should be sized for the peak power, rather than the nominal output power rating. However, oversizing the magnetic device increases its cost, which is an important consideration for high volume markets such as the markets for printers, modems, and personal computers. Designing a power converter for peak power also increases power losses at lower power levels because the power converter is typically designed to enter a discontinuous conduction mode (“DCM”) at a higher output power level than a power converter designed to operate only at a nominal output power level.
Power conversion efficiency of power adapters has become a significant marketing criterion, particularly since the publication of recent U.S. Energy Star specifications that require a power conversion efficiency of power adapters for personal computers to be at least 50 percent at output power levels below about one watt. The “One Watt Initiative” of the International Energy Agency is another energy saving initiative to reduce appliance standby power to one watt or less. These efficiency requirements at very low output power levels were established in view of the typical load presented by a printer in an idle or sleep mode, which is an operational state for a large fraction of the time for such devices in a home or office environment. A challenge for a power adapter designer is to provide a high level of power conversion efficiency over a wide range of output power.
Numerous strategies have been developed to reduce manufacturing costs and increase power conversion efficiency of power adapters over a wide range of output power levels including the incorporation of a burst operating mode at very low output power levels, the inclusion of an energy-recovery snubber circuit or a custom integrated controller, and a carefully tailored specification. Each of these approaches, however, provides a cost or efficiency limitation that often fails to distinguish a particular vendor in the marketplace. Accordingly, what is needed in the art is a design approach for a power adapter that enables a further reduction in manufacturing cost and improvement in power conversion efficiency that does not compromise end-product performance, and that can be advantageously adapted to high-volume manufacturing techniques. Additionally, what is needed in the art is a magnetic device employable with a power adapter or the like that enables the magnetizing inductance of the magnetic device to increase at lower current levels.
These and other problems are generally solved or circumvented, and technical advantages are generally achieved, by advantageous embodiments of the present invention, including a power converter including a power switch, a controller for controlling a switching frequency thereof, and a magnetic device with a non-uniform gap. In one embodiment, the power converter includes a power switch and a magnetic device coupled to the power switch and having a non-uniform gap. The power converter also includes a controller having a detector configured to sense a condition representing an output power of the power converter. A control circuit of the controller is configured to control a switching frequency of the power switch as a function of the condition and control a duty cycle of the power switch to regulate an output characteristic of the power converter.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a magnetic device with a non-uniform gap including a magnetic core having first and second core sections, wherein the second core section of the magnetic core has a leg that forms a gap with the first core section of the magnetic core. An end of the leg of the second core section of the magnetic core may have a reduced cross-sectional area or a hole bored therein to form the non-uniform gap. Alternatively, the leg of the second core section of the magnetic cores may have a core piecepart positioned at an end thereof or a tapered region at an end thereof to form the non-uniform gap. In an alternative embodiment, the magnetic device may include another magnetic core having first and second core sections, wherein the second core section of the another magnetic core has a leg that forms a gap with the first core section thereof. The gaps of the two magnetic cores to form a non-uniform gap for the magnetic device.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter, which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures or processes for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Corresponding numerals and symbols in the different figures generally refer to corresponding parts unless otherwise indicated, and may not be redescribed in the interest of brevity after the first instance. The FIGUREs are drawn to illustrate the relevant aspects of exemplary embodiments.
The making and using of the present exemplary embodiments are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will be described with respect to exemplary embodiments in a specific context, namely, a power converter including a power switch, a controller for controlling a switching frequency thereof, and a magnetic device with a non-uniform gap. While the principles of the present invention will be described in the environment of a power converter, any application that may benefit from a power conversion device including a power switch, a controller and a magnetic device such as a power amplifier or a motor controller is well within the broad scope of the present invention.
A flyback power converter is often employed in low power applications such as a power adapter for a printer because of its simplicity and low cost. Power adapters employing a flyback power converter are typically designed to operate continuously at a high output power level. However, the loads presented to power adapters such as loads provided by printers and personal computers are generally variable, and usually do not operate for an extended period of time at a maximum power level. A consideration for the design of power adapters for these applications is power conversion efficiency at light and moderate loads.
A flyback power converter is conventionally designed to operate at a substantially constant switching frequency. Other power converter topologies are designed to operate with a switching frequency that decreases as the load increases. To reduce electromagnetic interference (“EMI”), the switching frequency may be modulated, typically in a random manner, to produce small frequency deviations around a nominal switching frequency. The random variation of the switching frequency spreads the spectrum of the electromagnetic interference frequency components and reduces its peak spectral values. The reduced peak spectral values can provide a significant reduction in added components to manage the electromagnetic interference produced by the switching action of the power train of the power converter. However, the effect of these small frequency deviations on the design of principal elements of the power train such as the magnetic device (e.g., transformer) and the power switch as well as power conversion efficiency is generally insubstantial.
As introduced herein, as the output power supplied by the power converter to the load increases, the switching frequency of the switch(es) of the power converter is increased. The increased switching frequency decreases the peak current through a magnetic device employed in the power train topology, particularly in a flyback power train topology. Correspondingly, the peak flux in a magnetic device is reduced. The ripple current in a filter component of the power converter such as an output inductor may also be reduced. The size of the magnetic device such as the transformer may be advantageously reduced. As a result, the power converter not only can use a smaller transformer, but the power converter can also maintain operation in a continuous conduction mode (“CCM”) at a lower power level, enabling increased power conversion efficiency at a lower power level. The technique of controlling (e.g., varying) the switching frequency as a function of a condition representing an output power of the power converter (e.g., a sensed current or a sensed output power level) can be used to reduce the switching frequency of the switch(es) of the power converter over most or all of the load range as the output power is reduced to further increase power conversion efficiency at lower power levels. During lower power operation, reduction of the switching frequency reduces switching losses that become a smaller percentage of the total power converter losses. The reduction in switching frequency thus increases power conversion efficiency during lower power operation.
The switching frequency may be controlled to be proportional to the output power of the power converter and in accordance with a selected input voltage thereof. Advantageously, a lower switching frequency limit such as 20 kilohertz (“kHz”) may be employed to prevent operation within a range of human hearing. At a very low output power level such as one percent or less of maximum rated output power, a burst mode of operation may also be employed to control the power converter. In a burst mode of operation, the switching action of the switch(es) of the power train of the power converter is temporarily stopped while an output filter capacitor supplies power to the load. After the output filter capacitor is partially (or only slightly) discharged, the switching action of the power train is resumed. Thus, the switching frequency may be controlled to be proportional to the output power of the power converter during a non-burst mode of operation thereof.
The process of increasing and decreasing switching frequency parallel to increased and decreased load on the power converter may be applied to a power train topology wherein a peak magnetic flux in a magnetic device is dependent on the load on the power converter. For example, the process of controlling switching frequency with a condition representing an output power of the power converter may be applied to a buck or to a boost power train topology, including isolated and nonisolated topology variants such as a power-factor controlled boost power train topology.
Turning now to
The power switch Qmain (e.g., an n-channel field-effect transistor) is controlled by a pulse-width modulator (“PWM”) 160 that controls the power switch Qmain to be conducting for a duty cycle. The power switch Qmain conducts in response to gate drive signal VG produced by a pulse-width modulator 160 of a control circuit 155 with a switching frequency (often designated as “fs”). The duty cycle is controlled (e.g., adjusted) by the pulse-width modulator 160 to regulate an output characteristic of the power converter such as an output voltage Vout, an output current Iout, or a combination of the two. A feedback path 161 enables the pulse-width modulator 160 to control the duty cycle to regulate the output characteristic of the power converter. Of course, as is well known in the art, a circuit isolation element such as an opto-isolator may be employed in the feedback path 161 to maintain input-output isolation of the power converter.
The ac voltage appearing on the secondary winding Ns of the transformer T1 is rectified by the diode D1, and the dc component of the resulting waveform is coupled to the output through the low-pass output filter including an output filter capacitor Cout to produce the output voltage Vout. A detector 170 senses a condition representing an output power of the power converter (e.g., a current in a current-sensing resistor RCS) and a frequency control circuit (“FCC”) 180 of the control circuit 155 is configured to control (e.g., modify, alter, vary, etc.) the switching frequency of the power switch Qmain of the power converter in response to the sensed current as described further hereinbelow. The control circuit 155 may control the switching frequency of the power switch Qmain during a non burst mode of operation of the power converter and in accordance with a selected input voltage Vin or voltage range thereof. A feed-forward signal path 162 may be present to provide a voltage signal to the frequency control circuit 180 to enable feed-forward frequency control of the power converter based on the input voltage Vin thereto. For example, at a high-line input voltage Vin (e.g., 230VAC) the peak current in the power switch Qmain will be lower than at a low-line input voltage Vin (e.g., 115VAC) for a given output power level. The feed-forward signal path 162 may be used to compensate for the changes in the output of the detector 170 as a result of changes to the input voltage Vin. At the high-line input voltage Vin, the switching frequency of the power switch Qmain may be reduced. For instance, at the high-line input voltage Vin, the switching frequency of the power switch Qmain may be linearly reduced as a function of the input voltage Vin.
During a first portion of the duty cycle, a current Ipri (e.g., an inductor current) flowing through the primary winding Np of the transformer T1 increases as current flows from the input through the power switch Qmain. During a complementary portion of the duty cycle (generally co-existent with a complementary duty cycle 1-D of the power switch Qmain), the power switch Qmain is transitioned to a non-conducting state. Residual magnetic energy stored in the transformer T1 causes conduction of current through the diode D1 when the power switch Qmain is off. The diode D1, which is coupled to the output filter capacitor Cout, provides a path to maintain continuity of a magnetizing current of the transformer T1. During the complementary portion of the duty cycle, the magnetizing current flowing through the secondary winding Ns of the transformer T1 decreases. In general, the duty cycle of the power switch Qmain may be controlled (e.g., adjusted) to maintain a regulation of or regulate the output voltage Vout of the power converter.
In order to regulate the output voltage Vout, a value or a scaled value of the output voltage Vout is typically compared with a reference voltage in the pulse-width modulator 160 using an error amplifier (not shown) to control the duty cycle. This forms a negative feedback arrangement to regulate the output voltage Vout to a (scaled) value of the reference voltage. A larger duty cycle implies that the power switch Qmain is closed for a longer fraction of the switching period of the power converter.
The energy storage inductor of the flyback power train is incorporated into the transformer T1 as the magnetizing inductance of transformer T1. In order to provide the power conversion at high efficiency, the power converter operates in a continuous conduction mode at low-line input voltage. In the continuous conduction mode, the current flowing through the power switch Qmain starts at a positive value when the power switch Qmain first turns on (i.e., closed or conducting). While the power switch Qmain is off (i.e., open or non-conducting) and while the diode D1 is on, the current through the diode D1 does not decrease to zero. An active power switch such as a field-effect transistor may be substituted for the diode D1 as a synchronous rectifier to improve power conversion efficiency.
Turning now to
The output voltage Vout of a flyback power converter in a continuous conduction mode can be represented approximately by equation (1):
Vout=Vin·[D/(1−D)]·(1/n),
where D is the duty cycle of the power switch Qmain (i.e., the fraction of time during which the power switch Qmain is on, closed or conducting), and “n” is the ratio of the number of turns in the primary winding Np of the transformer T1 to the number of turns in the secondary winding Ns. Thus, when operating in the continuous conduction mode, the duty cycle of the power converter is determined by the ratio of input voltage Vin to the output voltage Vout. Also, when operating in the continuous conduction mode, the output power of the power converter determines the output current Iout and, therefore, the output power is controlled by the transformer T1 turns ratio. For a given transformer T1 turns ratio n:1 (which is limited by the voltage rating of the power switch Qmain and the need to operate at reasonably high duty cycles to obtain high power conversion efficiency), the average value of the current in the power switch Qmain is determined by the load. The average value of the current in the power switch Qmain is independent of the switching frequency.
A conventional way of operating a flyback power converter, particularly in power adapters, is to use a substantially constant switching frequency. At very light load, as indicated previously above, a power converter may operate in a burst mode of operation wherein the power converter is intermittently disabled to reduce light- or no-load power consumption. As introduced herein, a controller 150 monitors a condition representing an output power of the power converter (e.g., a sensed current such as a sensed peak current through a current-sensing resistor Rcs or other current-sensing element such as a current-sensing transformer) to control the switching frequency of the power converter. Alternatively, the controller 150 may monitor other conditions representing an output power of the power converter such as a current in another power train component (e.g., a secondary-side component) to control the switching frequency of the power converter. As the peak current in the current-sensing resistor RCS (or other current-sensing element) illustrated in
Turning now to
A detector 310 formed with a diode D2 and a capacitor C2 coupled to the current-sensing resistor RCS detects a condition representing an output power of the power converter (e.g., a peak current flowing through the power switch Qmain) producing a voltage across the capacitor C2 that is substantially proportional to the peak current in the current-sensing resistor RCS. An amplifier A1 may optionally be included in accordance with the detector 310 of the controller 300 to increase a voltage sensed across the current-sensing resistor RCS to a higher level. The voltage produced across the capacitor C2 in conjunction with the resistor R2 of the detector 310 produces a base current for an amplifier (e.g., a bipolar transistor) Q1, which in turn produces a collector current for the bipolar transistor Q1. Of course, in an alternative embodiment, a field-effect transistor may be substituted for the bipolar transistor Q1 with appropriate circuit modifications. The collector current in the bipolar transistor Q1 flows through a current mirror formed with transistors Q2, Q3. The current-mirror current is coupled to the timing capacitor CT to control (e.g., increase) the switching frequency of the power converter as the peak current changes (e.g., increases) in the current-sensing resistor RCS. A frequency control circuit 320 of the controller 300 includes the timing capacitor CT, the timing resistor RT, the bipolar transistor Q1 and the current mirror. Thus, a control circuit including the frequency control circuit 320 and pulse-width modulator 330 is responsive to the detector 310 to control a switching frequency of the power switch(es) as well as control a duty cycle of the power switch Qmain to regulate an output characteristic of the power converter. The control circuit of the controller 300 illustrated in
Power transferred from the input to the output of the power converter is dependent on a change in energy storage in the transformer T1 during each switching cycle multiplied by the switching frequency. The power transferred to the output of the power converter can be represented by equation (2):
P=fs·[0.5·L·|(I+ΔI)2−(I−ΔI)2|]=fs·L·I·ΔI,
where P is the output power of the power converter, fs is the power converter switching frequency, L is the magnetizing inductance of the transformer T1 referenced to its primary winding Np, ΔI, as indicated previously above, is the change in the current in the primary winding Np of the transformer T1 during the first portion of the duty cycle as illustrated in
The average value I of the current Ipri flowing through the primary winding Np of the transformer T1 is also determined by the output power as a function of the turns ratio n:1 of the transformer T1. Increasing the switching frequency while maintaining a constant output power level causes a decrease in the value of the change in current ΔI. A peak flux density Bpeak in the transformer T1 is proportional to the peak value of current as set forth in equation (3):
Bpeak∝I+ΔI/2.
Therefore, decreasing the value of the change in current ΔI decreases the peak value of peak flux density B, which enables the use of a smaller transformer core. Switching losses including core losses in the transformer T1 may be significantly increased during peak power operation due to the higher switching frequency. However, printer power adapters as well as power adapters coupled to other loads typically require only short bursts of high power. The overall effect of a brief increase in switching frequency on the power converter internal heating will generally be minimal.
A peak current may be employed as a determining factor in changing the switching frequency of a power converter. Since the peak current through the power switch Qmain is proportional to a flux density in the transformer T1, saturation of the transformer core may be advantageously prevented, regardless of input voltage Vin, output voltage Vout, or other operating condition of the power converter.
Reducing the switching frequency of a power converter as the load or output power decreases enables an improvement in power converter efficiency at light load. Thus, switching frequency may be altered over substantially the entire power range of the power converter, excepting a limitation imposed by a lower frequency limit. In an embodiment, the switching frequency may be substantially proportional to the output power level over an operating range of the power converter, with an optional lower limit on the switching frequency and in accordance with a selected input voltage Vin of the power converter.
When designing a power adapter, a designer is typically interested either in increasing power conversion efficiency while holding cost substantially constant, or decreasing cost while holding a performance characteristic constant such as power conversion efficiency. The process introduced herein of increasing switching frequency at peak power to reduce core flux density in a magnetic device enables a decrease in cost by allowing a reduction in core size, while holding normal power performance characteristic substantially constant.
The process of increasing switching frequency at higher load levels can be employed to increase efficiency at lighter load levels while holding cost approximately constant. To accomplish this objective, a region of reduced core cross-sectional area can be employed in the magnetic device (e.g., transformer) core to produce effectively a variable in the magnetic path of the flux. During a burst of peak power, the region of the core with reduced cross-sectional area saturates, effectively lengthening the gap (e.g., forming a non-uniform gap as described below) and reducing the magnetizing inductance of the transformer. The slope (with respect to time) of the current will increase due to reduced transformer magnetizing inductance at high current/flux levels. However, the increase in switching frequency at high load levels reduces the period of time during which current rises, enabling a circuit designer to hold the value of the change in current ΔI more nearly constant by relating the increase in power converter switching frequency to the decreased magnetizing inductance of the transformer.
A gap in a transformer core may cause a significant power loss by causing a fringing flux to flow through nearby conductive windings. Conductive materials such as transformer windings formed around a transformer center leg should not be placed in the immediate vicinity of the gap. This reduces a fringing flux flowing in adjacent windings by focusing the flux at the center of the transformer leg, which is the area farthest from the surrounding windings.
Turning now to
When the construction of the transformer is complete, the “I” core section 401 is positioned on the top of the outer legs (one of which is designated 404) of the “E” core section 402. A center leg 403 is formed shorter than the outer legs 404, thereby forming a gap 406 for the magnetic flux. The gap 406, which may be formed as an air gap or a gap including another nonmagnetic material, reduces the flux in the core, thereby reducing the tendency of the core to saturate at high current levels. Nonetheless, inclusion of the gap 406 reduces the magnetizing inductance of the transformer compared to a transformer without such a gap. The gap 406 may also be formed with a nonmagnetic material such as a plastic spacer or may include a magnetic material such a powdered magnetic material combined with a nonmagnetic binder to form a distributed gap.
Turning now to
The structure shown in
The absence or reduction of core saturation at low flux and current levels produces a high magnetizing inductance in the transformer and enables efficient operation at low output power levels. A transformer constructed with a core leg with reduced cross-sectional area may also be constructed with essentially no gap, enabling a high magnetizing inductance to be produced for the transformer that saturates at a high current level in a controlled manner.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Non-uniform gaps in magnetic devices are traditionally formed by grinding down a portion of a core leg. This process increases the cost of the core by requiring a separate grinding operation and also reduces the accuracy of the gap length due to inaccuracies of grinding methods. In order to reduce the manufactured cost and increase dimensional accuracy of the gap lengths in a non-uniform-gap magnetic device, a method is introduced herein for creating the non-uniform gap.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Thus, a magnetic device with a non-uniform gap has been introduced herein. In one embodiment, the magnetic device includes a first magnetic core having first and second core sections (e.g., “I” or “E” core sections), wherein the second core section of the first magnetic core has a leg (e.g., a center or outer leg) that forms a first gap (e.g., an air gap or distributed gap) with the first core section of the first magnetic core. The magnetic device also includes a second magnetic core adjacent to the first magnetic core and having first and second core sections (e.g., “I” or “E” core sections), wherein the second core section of the second magnetic core has a leg (e.g., a center or outer leg) that forms a second gap (e.g., an air gap or distributed gap) with the first core section of the second magnetic core. The first and second gaps form a non-uniform gap for the magnetic device. For instance, the first gap may be smaller than the second gap to form the non-uniform gap. Additionally, the first core section of the first and second magnetic cores may be formed as a single core section.
Those skilled in the art should understand that the previously described embodiments of a power converter including a controller and related methods of operating the same are submitted for illustrative purposes only. In addition, various other power converter topologies such as a boost power converter and a single ended primary inductor power converter topologies are well within the broad scope of the present invention. While a power converter including a controller to control a switching frequency of a power switch has been described in the environment of a power converter, the controller may also be applied to other systems such as, without limitation, a power amplifier or a motor controller.
For a better understanding of power converters, see “Modern DC-to-DC Power Switch-mode Power Converter Circuits,” by Rudolph P. Severns and Gordon Bloom, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, N.Y. (1985) and “Principles of Power Electronics,” by J. G. Kassakian, M. F. Schlecht and G. C. Verghese, Addison-Wesley (1991). The aforementioned references are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Also, although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, many of the processes discussed above can be implemented in different methodologies and replaced by other processes, or a combination thereof.
Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, methods, and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1376978 | Stoekle | May 1921 | A |
2473662 | Pohm | Jun 1949 | A |
3007060 | Guenther | Oct 1961 | A |
3346798 | Dinger | Oct 1967 | A |
3358210 | Grossoehme | Dec 1967 | A |
3433998 | Woelber | Mar 1969 | A |
3484562 | Kronfeld | Dec 1969 | A |
3553620 | Cielo et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3602795 | Gunn | Aug 1971 | A |
3622868 | Todt | Nov 1971 | A |
3681679 | Chung | Aug 1972 | A |
3708742 | Gunn | Jan 1973 | A |
3708744 | Stephens et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
4019122 | Ryan | Apr 1977 | A |
4075547 | Wroblewski | Feb 1978 | A |
4202031 | Hesler et al. | May 1980 | A |
4257087 | Cuk | Mar 1981 | A |
4274071 | Pfarre | Jun 1981 | A |
4327348 | Hirayama | Apr 1982 | A |
4471423 | Hase | Sep 1984 | A |
4499481 | Greene | Feb 1985 | A |
4570174 | Huang et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4577268 | Easter et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4581691 | Hock | Apr 1986 | A |
4613841 | Roberts | Sep 1986 | A |
4636823 | Margalit et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4660136 | Montorefano | Apr 1987 | A |
4770667 | Evans et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4770668 | Skoultchi et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4785387 | Lee et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4799138 | Chahabadi et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4803609 | Gillett et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4823249 | Garcia, II | Apr 1989 | A |
4837496 | Erdi | Jun 1989 | A |
4853668 | Bloom | Aug 1989 | A |
4866367 | Ridley et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4876638 | Silva et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4887061 | Matsumura | Dec 1989 | A |
4899271 | Seiersen | Feb 1990 | A |
4903089 | Hollis et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4922400 | Cook | May 1990 | A |
4962354 | Visser et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4964028 | Spataro | Oct 1990 | A |
4999759 | Cavagnolo et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5003277 | Sokai et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5014178 | Balakrishnan | May 1991 | A |
5027264 | DeDoncker et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5068756 | Morris et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5106778 | Hollis et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5126714 | Johnson | Jun 1992 | A |
5132888 | Lo et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134771 | Lee et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5172309 | DeDoncker et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177460 | Dhyanchand et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5182535 | Dhyanchand | Jan 1993 | A |
5204809 | Andresen | Apr 1993 | A |
5206621 | Yerman | Apr 1993 | A |
5208739 | Sturgeon | May 1993 | A |
5223449 | Morris et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5225971 | Spreen | Jul 1993 | A |
5231037 | Yuan et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5244829 | Kim | Sep 1993 | A |
5262930 | Hua et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282126 | Husgen | Jan 1994 | A |
5285396 | Aoyama | Feb 1994 | A |
5291382 | Cohen | Mar 1994 | A |
5303138 | Rozman | Apr 1994 | A |
5305191 | Loftus, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5335163 | Seiersen | Aug 1994 | A |
5336985 | McKenzie | Aug 1994 | A |
5342795 | Yuan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343140 | Gegner | Aug 1994 | A |
5353001 | Meinel et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5369042 | Morris et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374887 | Drobnik | Dec 1994 | A |
5399968 | Sheppard et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5407842 | Morris et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5459652 | Faulk | Oct 1995 | A |
5468661 | Yuan et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477175 | Tisinger et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5508903 | Alexndrov | Apr 1996 | A |
5523673 | Ratliff et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539630 | Pietkiewicz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5554561 | Plumton | Sep 1996 | A |
5555494 | Morris | Sep 1996 | A |
5610085 | Yuan et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5624860 | Plumton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5663876 | Newton et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5700703 | Huang et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712189 | Plumton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719544 | Vinciarelli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734564 | Brkovic | Mar 1998 | A |
5736842 | Jovanovic | Apr 1998 | A |
5742491 | Bowman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5747842 | Plumton | May 1998 | A |
5756375 | Celii et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760671 | Lahr et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783984 | Keuneke | Jul 1998 | A |
5784266 | Chen | Jul 1998 | A |
5804943 | Kollman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815383 | Lei | Sep 1998 | A |
5815386 | Gordon | Sep 1998 | A |
5864110 | Moriguchi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870299 | Rozman | Feb 1999 | A |
5880942 | Leu | Mar 1999 | A |
5886508 | Jutras | Mar 1999 | A |
5889298 | Plumton et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889660 | Taranowski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900822 | Sand et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907481 | Svärdsjö | May 1999 | A |
5909110 | Yuan et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5910665 | Plumton et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920475 | Boylan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5925088 | Nasu | Jul 1999 | A |
5929665 | Ichikawa et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933338 | Wallace | Aug 1999 | A |
5940287 | Brkovic | Aug 1999 | A |
5946207 | Schoofs | Aug 1999 | A |
5956245 | Rozman | Sep 1999 | A |
5956578 | Weitzel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959850 | Lim | Sep 1999 | A |
5977853 | Ooi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999066 | Saito et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999429 | Brown | Dec 1999 | A |
6003139 | McKenzie | Dec 1999 | A |
6008519 | Yuan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011703 | Boylan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038154 | Boylan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046664 | Weller et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055166 | Jacobs et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060943 | Jansen | May 2000 | A |
6067237 | Nguyen | May 2000 | A |
6069798 | Liu | May 2000 | A |
6069799 | Bowman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078510 | Spampinato et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084792 | Chen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094038 | Lethellier | Jul 2000 | A |
6097046 | Plumton | Aug 2000 | A |
6125046 | Jang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6144187 | Bryson | Nov 2000 | A |
6147886 | Wittenbreder | Nov 2000 | A |
6156611 | Lan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160721 | Kossives et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163466 | Davila, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181231 | Bartilson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188586 | Farrington et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191964 | Boylan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208535 | Parks | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215290 | Yang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218891 | Lotfi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229197 | Plumton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6262564 | Kanamori | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288501 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288920 | Jacobs et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295217 | Yang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304460 | Cuk | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309918 | Huang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317021 | Jansen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317337 | Yasumura | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320490 | Clayton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323090 | Zommer | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325035 | Codina et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344986 | Jain et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345364 | Lee | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348848 | Herbert | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351396 | Jacobs | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356462 | Jang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362986 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373727 | Hedenskog et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373734 | Martinelli | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380836 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6388898 | Fan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392902 | Jang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400579 | Cuk | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6414578 | Jitaru | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438009 | Assow | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6462965 | Uesono | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466461 | Mao et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6469564 | Jansen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477065 | Parks | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483724 | Blair et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489754 | Blom | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6498367 | Chang et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501193 | Krugly | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504321 | Giannopoulos et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512352 | Qian | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6525603 | Morgan | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539299 | Chatfield et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545453 | Glinkowski et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6548992 | Alcantar et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549436 | Sun | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552917 | Bourdillon | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563725 | Carsten | May 2003 | B2 |
6570268 | Perry et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6580627 | Toshio | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597592 | Carsten | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6608768 | Sula | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611132 | Nakagawa et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614206 | Wong et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6654259 | Koshita et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661276 | Chang | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668296 | Dougherty et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674658 | Mao et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683797 | Zaitsu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6687137 | Yasumura | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6696910 | Nuytkens et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6731486 | Holt et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741099 | Krugly | May 2004 | B1 |
6753723 | Zhang | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765810 | Perry | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6775159 | Webb et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784644 | Xu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6804125 | Brkovic | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813170 | Yang | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831847 | Perry | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6856149 | Yang | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862194 | Yang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6867678 | Yang | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6867986 | Amei | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873237 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882548 | Jacobs et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6906934 | Yang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6943553 | Zimmerman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944033 | Xu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6977824 | Yang et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6980077 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982887 | Batarseh et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009486 | Goeke et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7012414 | Mehrotra et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7016204 | Yang et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7026807 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034586 | Mehas et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034647 | Yan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7046523 | Sun et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7061358 | Yang | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7076360 | Ma | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7095638 | Uusitalo | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7098640 | Brown | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099163 | Ying | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7136293 | Petkov et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7148669 | Maksimovic et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7170268 | Kim | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176662 | Chandrasekaran | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7209024 | Nakahori | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7269038 | Shekhawat et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7280026 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285807 | Brar et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298118 | Chandrasekaran | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301785 | Yasumura | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7312686 | Bruno | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321283 | Mehrotra et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7332992 | Iwai | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339208 | Brar et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7339801 | Yasumura | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7348612 | Sriram et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360004 | Dougherty et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362592 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362593 | Yang et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375607 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7385375 | Rozman | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386404 | Cargonja et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7417875 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427910 | Mehrotra et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7446512 | Nishihara et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7447049 | Garner et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468649 | Chandrasekaran | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471523 | Yang | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7489225 | Dadafshar | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499295 | Indika de Silva et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7554430 | Mehrotra et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558037 | Gong et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7558082 | Jitaru | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567445 | Coulson et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7630219 | Lee | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7633369 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7663183 | Brar et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667986 | Artusi et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675758 | Artusi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675759 | Artusi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675764 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7715217 | Manabe et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7733679 | Luger et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746041 | Xu et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7778050 | Yamashita | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778051 | Yang | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787264 | Yang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791903 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7795849 | Sohma | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813101 | Morikawa | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7847535 | Meynard et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7889517 | Artusi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7889521 | Hsu | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7906941 | Jayaraman et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7940035 | Yang | May 2011 | B2 |
7965528 | Yang et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7983063 | Lu et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8004112 | Koga et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8179699 | Tumminaro et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20020057080 | Telefus et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020114172 | Webb et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030026115 | Miyazaki | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030197585 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198067 | Sun et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040017689 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034555 | Dismukes et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040148047 | Dismukes et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156220 | Kim et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040200631 | Chen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217794 | Strysko | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050024179 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050245658 | Mehrotra et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281058 | Batarseh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060038549 | Mehrotra et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038649 | Mehrotra et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038650 | Mehrotra et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060109698 | Qu | May 2006 | A1 |
20060187684 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197510 | Chandrasekaran | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060198173 | Rozman | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226477 | Brar et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060226478 | Brar et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237968 | Chandrasekaran | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060255360 | Brar et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070007945 | King et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070045765 | Brar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069286 | Brar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070114979 | Chandrasekaran | May 2007 | A1 |
20070222463 | Qahouq et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241721 | Weinstein et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070296028 | Brar et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070298559 | Brar et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070298564 | Brar et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080024259 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080054874 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080111657 | Mehrotra et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130321 | Artusi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130322 | Artusi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137381 | Beasley | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150666 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080205104 | Lev et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224812 | Chandrasekaran | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232141 | Artusi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080298106 | Tataeishi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310190 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315852 | Jayaraman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316779 | Jayaraman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090097290 | Chandrasekaran | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090257250 | Liu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273957 | Feldtkeller | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284994 | Lin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090315530 | Baranwal | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100091522 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100123486 | Berghegger | May 2010 | A1 |
20100149838 | Artusi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100182806 | Garrity et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188876 | Garrity et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100254168 | Chandrasekaran | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100321964 | Brinlee et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110038179 | Zhang | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110134664 | Berghegger | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149607 | Jungreis et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110182089 | Berghegger | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110239008 | Lam et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110305047 | Jungreis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120243271 | Berghegger | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120294048 | Brinlee | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101141099 | Mar 2008 | CN |
201252294 | Jun 2009 | CN |
0 665 634 | Jan 1994 | EP |
57097361 | Jun 1982 | JP |
3-215911 | Sep 1991 | JP |
2000-68132 | Mar 2000 | JP |
WO8700991 | Feb 1987 | WO |
WO 2010083511 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010083514 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010114914 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2011116225 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Freescale Semiconductor, “Implementing a Digital AC/DC Switched-Mode Power Supply using a 56F8300 Digital Signal Controller,” Application Note AN3115, Aug. 2005, 24 pp., Chandler, AZ. |
Chhawchharia, P., et al., “On the Reduction of Component Count in Switched Capacitor DC/DC Convertors,” Hong Kong Polytechnic University, IEEE, 1997, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong King, pp. 1395-1401. |
Ajram, S., et al., “Ultrahigh Frequency DC-to-DC Converters Using GaAs Power Switches,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Sep. 2001, pp. 594-602, vol. 16, No. 5, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
“AN100: Application Note using Lx100 Family of High Performance N-Ch JFET Transistors,” AN100.Rev 1.01, Sep. 2003, 5 pp., Lovoltech, Inc., Santa Clara, CA. |
“AN101A: Gate Drive Network for a Power JFET,” AN101.Rev 1.2, Nov. 2003, 2 pp., Lovoltech, Inc., Santa Clara, CA. |
“AN108: Applications Note: How to Use Power JFETs® and MOSFETs Interchangeably in Low-Side Applications,” Rev. 1.0.1, Feb. 14, 2005, 4 pp., Lovoltech, Inc., Santa Clara, CA. |
Balogh, L., et al., “Power-Factor Correction with Interleaved Boost Converters in Continuous-Inductor-Current Mode,” IEEE Proceedings of APEC, pp. 168-174, 1993, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Biernacki, J., et al., “Radio Frequency DC-DC Flyback Converter,” Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Aug. 8-11, 2000, pp. 94-97, vol. 1, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Chen, W., et al., “Design of High Efficiency, Low Profile, Low Voltage Converter with Integrated Magnetics,” Proceedings of 1997 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference (APEC '97), 1997, pp. 911-917, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Chen, W., et al., “Integrated Planar Inductor Scheme for Multi-module Interleaved Quasi-Square-Wave (QSW) DC/DC Converter,” 30th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC '99), 1999, pp. 759-762, vol. 2, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Curtis, K., “Advances in Microcontroller Peripherals Facilitate Current-Mode for Digital Power Supplies,” Digital Power Forum '06, 4 pp., Sep. 2006, Darnell Group, Richardson, TX. |
Eisenbeiser, K., et al., “Manufacturable GaAs VFET for Power Switching Applications,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Apr. 2000, pp. 144-145, vol. 21, No. 4, IEEE. |
Gaye, M., et al., “A 50-100MHz 5V to -5V, 1W Cuk Converter Using Gallium Arsenide Power Switches,” ISCAS 2000—IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 28-31, 2000, pp. I-264-I-267, vol. 1, IEEE, Geneva, Switzerland. |
Goldberg, A.F., et al., “Issues Related to 1-10-MHz Transformer Design,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Jan. 1989, pp. 113-123, vol. 4, No. 1, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Goldberg, A.F., et al., “Finite-Element Analysis of Copper Loss in 1-10-MHz Transformers,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Apr. 1989, pp. 157-167, vol. 4, No. 2, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Jitaru, I.D., et al., “Quasi-Integrated Magnetic an Avenue for Higher Power Density and Efficiency in Power Converters,” 12th Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Feb. 23-27, 1997, pp. 395-402, vol. 1, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Kollman, R., et al., “10 MHz PWM Converters with GaAs VFETs,” IEEE 11th Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Mar. 1996, pp. 264-269, vol. 1, IEEE. |
Lee, P.-W., et al., “Steady-State Analysis of an Interleaved Boost Converter with Coupled Inductors,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Aug. 2000, pp. 787-795, vol. 47, No. 4, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Lenk, R., “Introduction to the Tapped Buck Converter,” PCIM 2000, HFPC 2000 Proceedings, Oct. 2000, pp. 155-166. |
Liu, W., “Fundamentals of III-V Devices: HBTs, MESFETs, and HFETs/HEMTs,” §5-5: Modulation Doping, 1999, pp. 323-330, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. |
Maksimović, D., et al., “Switching Converters with Wide DC Conversion Range,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Jan. 1991, pp. 151-157, vol. 6, No. 1, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Middlebrook, R.D., “Transformerless DC-to-DC Converters with Large Conversion Ratios,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Oct. 1988, pp. 484-488, vol. 3, No. 4, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Miwa, B.A., et al., “High Efficiency Power Factor Correction Using Interleaving Techniques,” IEEE Proceedings of APEC, 1992, pp. 557-568, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Nguyen, L.D., et al., “Ultra-High-Speed Modulation-Doped Field-Effect Transistors: A Tutorial Review,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Apr. 1992, pp. 494-518, vol. 80, No. 4, IEEE. |
Niemela, V.A., et al., “Comparison of GaAs and Silicon Synchronous Rectifiers in a 3.3V Out, 50W DC-DC Converter,” 27th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jun. 1996, pp. 861-867, vol. 1, IEEE. |
Ninomiya, T., et al., “Static and Dynamic Analysis of Zero-Voltage-Switched Half-Bridge Converter with PWM Control,” Proceedings of 1991 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC '91), 1991, pp. 230-237, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
O'Meara, K., “A New Output Rectifier Configuration Optimized for High Frequency Operation,” Proceedings of 1991 High Frequency Power Conversion (HFPC '91) Conference, Jun. 1991, pp. 219-225, Toronto, CA. |
Peng, C., et al., “A New Efficient High Frequency Rectifier Circuit,” Proceedings of 1991 High Frequency Power Conversion (HFPC '91) Conference, Jun. 1991, pp. 236-243, Toronto, CA. |
Pietkiewicz, A., et al. “Coupled-Inductor Current-Doubler Topology in Phase-Shifted Full-Bridge DC-DC Converter,” 20th International Telecommunications Energy Conference (INTELEC), Oct. 1998, pp. 41-48, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Plumton, D.L., et al., “A Low On-Resistance High-Current GaAs Power VFET,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Apr. 1995, pp. 142-144, vol. 16, No. 4, IEEE. |
Rajeev, M., “An Input Current Shaper with Boost and Flyback Converter Using Integrated Magnetics,” Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 5th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems 2003, Nov. 17-20, 2003, pp. 327-331, vol. 1, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Rico, M., et al., “Static and Dynamic Modeling of Tapped-Inductor DC-to-DC Converters,” 1987, pp. 281-288, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Severns, R., “Circuit Reinvention in Power Electronics and Identification of Prior Work,” Proceedings of 1997 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference (APEC '97), 1997, pp. 3-9, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Severns, R., “Circuit Reinvention in Power Electronics and Identification of Prior Work,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Jan. 2001, pp. 1-7, vol. 16, No. 1, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Sun, J., et al., “Unified Analysis of Half-Bridge Converters with Current-Doubler Rectifier,” Proceedings of 2001 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, 2001, pp. 514-520, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Sun, J., et al., “An Improved Current-Doubler Rectifier with Integrated Magnetics,” 17th Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), 2002, pp. 831-837, vol. 2, IEEE, Dallas, TX. |
Thaker, M., et al., “Adaptive/Intelligent Control and Power Management Reduce Power Dissipation and Consumption,” Digital Power Forum '06, 11 pp., Sep. 2006, Darnell Group, Richardson, TX. |
Wei, J., et al., “Comparison of Three Topology Candidates for 12V VRM,” IEEE APEC, 2001, pp. 245-251, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Weitzel, C.E., “RF Power Devices for Wireless Communications,” 2002 IEEE MTT-S CDROM, 2002,'pp. 285-288, paper TU4B-1, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Williams, R., “Modern GaAs Processing Methods,” 1990, pp. 66-67, Artech House, Inc., Norwood, MA. |
Wong, P.-L., et al., “Investigating Coupling Inductors in the Interleaving QSW VRM,” 15th Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC 2000), Feb. 2000, pp. 973-978, vol. 2, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Xu, P., et al., “Design and Performance Evaluation of Multi-Channel Interleaved Quasi-Square-Wave Buck Voltage Regulator Module,” HFPC 2000 Proceedings, Oct. 2000, pp. 82-88. |
Xu, P., et al., “Design of 48 V Voltage Regulator Modules with a Novel Integrated Magnetics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Nov. 2002, pp. 990-998, vol. 17, No. 6, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Xu, P., et al., “A Family of Novel Interleaved DC/DC Converters for Low-Voltage High-Current Voltage Regulator Module Applications,” IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jun. 2001, pp. 1507-1511, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Xu, P., et al., “A Novel Integrated Current Doubler Rectifier,” IEEE 2000 Applied Power Electronics Conference, Mar. 2000, pp. 735-740, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Yan, L., et al., “Integrated Magnetic Full Wave Converter with Flexible Output Inductor,” 17th Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), 2002, pp. 824-830, vol. 2, IEEE, Dallas, TX. |
Yan, L., et al., “Integrated Magnetic Full Wave Converter with Flexible Output Inductor,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Mar. 2003, pp. 670-678, vol. 18, No. 2, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Zhou, X., et al., “A High Power Density, High Efficiency and Fast Transient Voltage Regulator Module with a Novel Current Sensing and Current Sharing Technique,” IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Mar. 1999, pp. 289-294, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Zhou, X., et al., “Investigation of Candidate VRM Topologies for Future Microprocessors,” IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Mar. 1998, pp. 145-150, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. |
Freescale Semiconductor, “56F8323 Evaluation Module User Manual, 56F8300 16-bit Digital Signal Controllers”, MC56F8323EVMUM, Rev. 2, Jul. 2005 (72 pages). |
Freescale Semiconductor, “56F8323/56F8123 Data Sheet Preliminary Technical Data, 56F8300 16-bit Digital Signal Controllers,” MC56F8323 Rev. 17, Apr. 2007 (140 pages). |
Freescale Semiconductor, “Design of a Digital AC/DC SMPS using the 56F8323 Device, Designer Reference Manual, 56800E 16-bit Digital Signal Controllers”, DRM074, Rev. 0, Aug. 2005 (108 pages). |
Kuwabara, K., et al., “Switched-Capacitor DC—DC Converters,” Fujitsu Limited, IEEE, 1988 Kawasaki, Japan, pp. 213-218. |
Maxim, Application Note 725, www.maxim-ic.com/an725, Maxim Integrated Products, Nov. 29, 2001, 8 pages. |
National Semiconductor Corporation, “LM2665 Switched Capacitor Voltage Converter,” www.national.com, Sep. 2005, 9 pages. |
National Semiconductor Corporation, “LMC7660 Switched Capacitor Voltage Converter,” www.national.com, Apr. 1997, 12 pages. |
Power Integrations, Inc., “TOP200-4/14 TOPSwitch® Family Three-terminal Off-line PWM Switch,” Internet Citation http://www.datasheet4u.com/.download.php?id=311769, Jul. 1996, XP002524650, pp. 1-16. |
Texas Instruments Incorporated, “LT1054, LT1054Y Switched-Capacitor Voltage Converters With Regulators,” SLVS033C, Feb. 1990—Revised Jul. 1998, 25 pages. |
Vallamkonda, S., “Limitations of Switching Voltage Regulators,” A Thesis in Electrical Engineering, Texas Tech University, May 2004, 89 pages. |
Xu, M., et al., “Voltage Divider and its Application in the Two-stage Power Architecture,” Center for Power Electronics Systems, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, IEEE, 2006, Blacksburg, Virginia, pp. 499-505. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100321958 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |