1. Field of the Invention
The subject disclosure relates to systems for utilizing power generated by solar panels, and more particularly to an improved system for converting the power generated by a solar panel to improve safety and efficiency.
2. Background of the Related Art
In the modern world, the needs for electrical power are ubiquitous. However, many of the sources of electrical power such as nuclear energy and coal or fossil fuel power generation plants are not always feasible, and generate not only power but excessive pollution, exhaustion of resources and controversy. In an effort to avoid these drawbacks by utilizing the renewable energy of the sun, photovoltaic solar panel arrays are finding expanded use in the home environment and industry. Solar panel arrays are particularly well-suited to stand alone applications in isolated regions. Solar panel arrays not only function as an alternate energy source but excess power can be sold back to utility companies or stored for later use.
Referring to
The solar array 20 has a plurality of solar modules 30a-n which are comprised of a number of solar cells. Depending on the number of modules 30a-n, the system 10 can have a capacity from a few kilowatts to a hundred kilowatts or more. Typically, the number of modules is somewhat matched to meet the demands of the load because each module 30 represents a significant investment. Moreover, the roof 22 has limited area for conveniently and practically retaining the modules 30. Commonly, a module 30 consists of 36 photovoltaic cells which produce an open circuit voltage (OCV) of 21 to 23 VDC and a max power point voltage of 15 to 17 VDC. Standard power ratings for the solar modules 30 range from 50 W to 150 W. Thus, for an exemplary system 10, where two kilowatts are desired, as many as forty modules 30 may be needed.
For the most part, the prior art solar modules 30 are somewhat limited by their performance characteristics. In view of this, attempts have been made to optimize the solar module usage so that fewer solar modules 30 or less space are required. Tracking mechanisms have been added to actively orient each solar module 30 so that the incident sunlight is normal to the solar module 30 for increased efficiency. Other attempts at increasing efficiency and applicability of roof mounted solar arrays 20 have involved creating turrets to reduce the footprint thereof. Despite these attempts, solar arrays 20 are still uncommon and underutilized because of the additional expense and complexity these methods provide. As a result, the drawbacks of capacity and expense need to be overcome otherwise the range of practical applications for power from a solar arrays 20 will continue to be limited.
A common method for mounting a solar array 20 on the roof 22 is to mount each solar panel 30 individually and directly onto the surface of the roof 22. This method usually involves the installers carrying each solar panel 30 up to the roof and mounting them one at a time. Usually, the solar modules 30 are put into groups to form panels which, in turn, can be used to form the solar array 20. Solar modules 30 are live, i.e. outputting power, during installation. On a sunny day, the power generation can pose a safety hazard to the installers. There is a need, therefore, for an improved solar module control system which forces an improved module into a default off mode with no power output when not in use. Thus, adequate safety can be assured during installation and at other times of disconnection such as during replacement and repair.
Referring still to
The control system 40 includes a central inverter 44 for changing the raw power from the string combiner 42 into usable power for the load 26. The central inverter 44 includes a matching DC/DC converter 46 and an AC/DC converter 48. An optional battery 50 is also shown disposed between the matching DC/DC converter 46 and the AC/DC converter 48 for use in an off grid system or as part of an uninterruptible power supply (hereinafter “UPS”). The matching converter 46 drops the raw solar array power down from the string combiner 42 to a desired level. When a battery 50 is used, the typical desired level of voltage is 54V. Thus, the power generated by the solar array 20 may be stored in the battery for use during the night or fed to the AC/DC converter 48 for use by the load 26 or sale via the utility grid 28. The AC/DC converter 48 receives the 54 VDC power and outputs an AC current at a desired voltage and frequency such as for example 120, 208 or 240 VAC at 50 or 60 Hz. Converters 46, 48 are well known to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art and, therefore, not further described herein.
The matching converter 46 may also include maximum power point tracking (hereinafter “MPPT”) for varying the electrical operating point so that the solar array 20 delivers the maximum available power. This and other techniques for effectively using power generated by solar arrays are common. An example is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,046,919 to Madenokouji et al. and is incorporated herein by reference. From the foregoing, it may be observed that the MPPT optimizes the solar array 20 as a monolithic unit.
In actuality, the solar array 20 is made up of solar modules 30 that each typically includes thirty-two cells divided into two groups of sixteen. Each of the solar module cells and solar modules 30 may be from different manufacturers and have varied performance characteristics. Moreover, shading by clouds and the like varies the output from cell to cell and module 30 to module 30. Thus, significant improvements in the efficiencies of the solar panels 30 can be realized if each solar module 30 can be operated at peak power levels. Similarly, each group of sixteen cells or even each cell's performance can be enhanced by corresponding optimization. Such performance would permit solar arrays with less panels to reduce the cost of a given installation and broaden the range of practical applications for solar power. There is a need, therefore, for a cost effective and simple control system which can greatly increase efficiency in new and existing solar arrays.
Further, the typical solar array 20 has a variable output not only throughout the day but the output voltage also varies according to other parameters such as temperature. As a result, the central inverter 44 is also required to be a variable regulator to control these variations. In the United States, galvanic isolation is required for connection to the utility grid 28. The galvanic isolation is usually achieved by a 60 Hz transformer on the output of the central inverter 44. These prior art necessities further increase the cost and complexity of the control system 40. A solar array which does not need the central inverter 44 to act as a variable regulator or galvanic isolation would advantageously reduce the cost and complexity of the control system.
Further still, solar arrays 20 that are configured for grid connect only (without UPS function available) operate only while the utility grid 28 is on. In a problematic manner, if a utility grid outage occurs, the power generated by the solar array 20 cannot be accessed to run the load 26. Even for periodic outages lasting for only seconds, requirements are such that the solar array 20 cannot be reconnected for five minutes after the utility grid power has returned. Thus, a need exists for a solar array control unit which can supply power to the load even when a utility grid outage occurs.
The present invention is directed to a control unit for controlling an output of a solar module. The control unit includes a converter for coupling to the output of the solar module, the converter being configured and arranged to convert the output to a high voltage and low current.
It would be desirable to provide a solar array with increased capacity, for a given size, while reducing the complexity and expense so that solar power may be used more economically and for a wider range of applications.
It would be desirable to provide a solar panel array which optimizes the power output at a subcomponent level to increase the overall power generated.
It would be desirable to provide a control system for a solar array which can be retrofit onto existing arrays to provide increased power generation.
It would be desirable to provide a control system for a solar panel which defaults in an off mode for allowing safe installation.
It would be desirable to provide a control system which allows for utilization of the power generated by a solar array even when the grid power is down.
It would be desirable to provide a simplified control system which utilizes standard, off-the-shelf components. It would further be desirable to provide an inverter that is standard. In a further embodiment, the inverter would also provide galvanic isolation from the utility grid.
It would be desirable to provide a solar array which produces power at a relatively high voltage and low current to allow for relatively small cables to carry the power in a safe and convenient manner. It would further be desirable for the solar array power to be at a desirable DC voltage to allow use of off-the-shelf components. In one embodiment, a control unit controls an output of a solar device. The control unit includes a converter coupled to the output of the solar device such that the solar device output is converted to a high voltage and low current. Preferably, the high voltage is between approximately 200 and 600 VDC and the solar device is selected from the group consisting of a solar module, a group of solar cells and a solar cell. The converter also preferably includes MPPT.
Still another embodiment is directed to a control unit for a solar module in a solar array for maximizing the output of the solar module. The control unit includes a converter for coupling to the cells of the solar module and, thereby, maximize a power output of each cell.
Yet still another embodiment is a solar module array including a plurality of solar modules connected in parallel and a low voltage to high voltage DC/DC converter coupled to each solar module for maximizing a power output by each respective module. Preferably, the solar module array also includes a DC/AC inverter coupled to an output of the DC/DC converters for outputting a usable power to a load.
It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented and utilized in numerous ways, including without limitation as a process, an apparatus, a system, a device and a method for applications now known and later developed. These and other unique features of the system disclosed herein will become more readily apparent from the following description and the accompanying drawings.
So that those having ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosed system appertains will more readily understand how to make and use the same, reference may be had to the drawings wherein:
The present invention overcomes many of the prior art problems associated with solar arrays. The advantages, and other features of the systems and methods disclosed herein, will become more readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art from the following detailed description of certain preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the drawings which set forth representative embodiments of the present invention and wherein like reference numerals identify similar structural elements.
Referring to
In a further embodiment, the DC/DC converters 131 include MPPT. The DC/DC converter 131 with MPPT maximizes the module output according to the present operating conditions of the solar module 130. For example, module 130a may be temporarily shaded by a cloud or object while module 130c is receiving direct sunlight. Under such circumstances, the performance characteristics of panels 130a and 130c would be different, e.g., the optimum power settings for each panel would not be the same. The corresponding DC/DC converters 131a and 131c would uniquely adjust the module's operation such that modules 130a and 130c will produce the maximum power possible individually. Accordingly, the maximum power output of the solar array 120 is maximized and fewer modules 130 may be employed to produce comparable power to prior art systems.
In a preferred embodiment, each module 130 contains thirty-two cells divided into two groups of sixteen. A diode (not shown) is commonly disposed between each group of sixteen cells to prevent reverse current flow during shady conditions and other events which may cause variation in panel output. A plurality of DC/DC converters 131 regulate the output of each group of sixteen cells of the module 130 by picking up the output at the diode. Thus, the advantages of the subject disclosure may be utilized in new and existing solar modules by retrofit. In still another embodiment, the DC/DC converters 131 are connected to maximize the output of each cell of the module 130.
In a further embodiment, the DC/DC converters 131 are also configured to require a signal from the control system 140 to output power. If the panel 130 is not receiving this signal, then the default mode of no power output is achieved. Consequently, installers can handle panels 130 on a sunny day without concern for the live power generated thereby.
The control system 140 is also improved by further simplification in the preferred system 110. The control system 140 includes a central inverter 144 having a single DC/AC inverter 147. The DC/AC inverter 147 prepares the raw power from the solar array 120 for use by the load 126 or sale to the utility company via the utility grid 128. In the preferred embodiment, the inverter 147 is a relatively simple, low dynamic range, off-the-shelf high voltage inverter for dropping the voltage down and creating the desired frequency. Since the DC/DC converters 131 regulate the power outage from the solar panels 130, the control system 140 can be optimized for efficiency since a very small input voltage range is required for operation. In an embodiment where the solar array 120 outputs 400 VDC, a standardized inverter 147 can be used to beneficially and significantly reduce the wiring complexity and, thereby, the cost of the control system 140. In a further embodiment, galvanic isolation can be maintained in the standardized inverter 147. Accordingly, the control system 140 is further simplified.
Referring now to
In still another embodiment, the energy storage device 250 is a capacitor and the system 210 acts as an uninterruptible power supply. The capacitor 250 charges during normal operation as the solar array 220 and utility grid 228 provide power to the load 226. In a system with a conventional battery, such operation would shorten the life of the battery as is known to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. However, with a capacitor such short life is avoided.
During an interruption of utility grid power, the capacitor discharges to provide interim power to the load 226 until an electronic switch (not shown) can be actuated to allow the solar array 220 to meet the demand of the load 226. It is envisioned that the capacitor will be able to meet the demand for at least twenty seconds although advantages would be provided by a capacitor with only a few seconds of sustained power output. Thus, the power output from the solar array 220 can still be accessed even when the utility grid 228 is down. In a further embodiment, the capacitor is what is commonly known as an electro-chemical capacitor or ultra capacitor. The capacitor may be a carbon-carbon configuration, an asymmetrical carbon-nickel configuration or any suitable capacitor now known or later developed. An acceptable nominal 48V, 107F ultra capacitor is available from ESMA of the Troitsk Moscow Region in Russia, under model no. 30EC104U.
In another embodiment, an alternative energy source such as a conventional fuel burning generator, fuel cell or other suitable alternative acts as a backup in combination with a solar array.
While the invention has been described with respect to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that various changes and/or modifications can be made to the invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/282,037, filed Oct. 26, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/556,764, filed Oct. 17, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,102,144, which is a National Stage Entry of PCT/US04/16668, filed May 27, 2004, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/473,749, which was filed on May 28, 2003, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4161771 | Bates | Jul 1979 | A |
4257087 | Cuk | Mar 1981 | A |
4453207 | Paul | Jun 1984 | A |
4580090 | Bailey et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4652770 | Kumano | Mar 1987 | A |
4685040 | Steigerwald et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4819121 | Saito et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
RE33057 | Clegg et al. | Sep 1989 | E |
4899269 | Rouzies | Feb 1990 | A |
5001415 | Watkinson | Mar 1991 | A |
5027051 | Lafferty | Jun 1991 | A |
5268832 | Kandatsu | Dec 1993 | A |
5280232 | Kohl et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5327071 | Frederick et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5513075 | Capper et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5548504 | Takehara | Aug 1996 | A |
5604430 | Decker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5644219 | Kurokawa | Jul 1997 | A |
5659465 | Flack | Aug 1997 | A |
5684385 | Guyonneau et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5686766 | Tamechika | Nov 1997 | A |
5747967 | Muljadi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5793184 | O'Connor | Aug 1998 | A |
5801519 | Midya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838148 | Kurokami et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5869956 | Nagao et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5923100 | Lukens et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923158 | Kurokami et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932994 | Jo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949668 | Schweighofer | Sep 1999 | A |
5986909 | Hammond et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990659 | Frannhagen | Nov 1999 | A |
6002603 | Carver | Dec 1999 | A |
6046919 | Madenokouji et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058035 | Madenokouji et al. | May 2000 | A |
6093885 | Takehara et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111188 | Kurokami et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111391 | Cullen | Aug 2000 | A |
6166455 | Li | Dec 2000 | A |
6169678 | Kondo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175512 | Hagihara et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6225793 | Dickmann | May 2001 | B1 |
6255804 | Herniter et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262558 | Weinberg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268559 | Yamawaki | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281485 | Siri | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311137 | Kurokami et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320769 | Kurokami et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6369461 | Jungreis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369462 | Siri | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6429621 | Arai | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433522 | Siri | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448489 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6465910 | Young et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6509712 | Landis | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515215 | Mimura | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6515217 | Aylaian | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6528977 | Arakawa | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545211 | Mimura | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560131 | vonBrethorst | May 2003 | B1 |
6587051 | Takehara et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6628011 | Droppo et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6650031 | Goldack | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657419 | Renyolds | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664762 | Kutkut | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678174 | Suzui et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690590 | Stamenic et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6765315 | Hammerstrom et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6800964 | Beck | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6801442 | Suzui et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809942 | Madenokouji | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810339 | Wills | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6838611 | Kondo et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6838856 | Raichle | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6844739 | Kasai et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850074 | Adams et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6897370 | Kondo et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914418 | Sung | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919714 | Delepaut | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6966184 | Toyomura et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984970 | Capel | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6987444 | Bub et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7030597 | Bruno et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031176 | Kotsopoulos et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042195 | Tsunetsugu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045991 | Nakamura et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046531 | Zocchi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053506 | Alonso et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7087332 | Harris | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7126294 | Minami et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7158395 | Deng et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7161082 | Matsushita et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7259474 | Blanc | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7336004 | Lai | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339287 | Jepsen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7371963 | Suenaga et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7612283 | Toyomura et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7709727 | Roehrig et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7733069 | Toyomura et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8067855 | Mumtaz et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010011881 | Emori | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020038667 | Kondo | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047309 | Droppo et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063552 | Arakawa | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078991 | Nagao et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030002303 | Riggio et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030038612 | Kutkut | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030047207 | Aylaian | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030075211 | Makita et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080741 | LeRow et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030090233 | Browe | May 2003 | A1 |
20030201674 | Droppo et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206424 | Jungreis | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223257 | Onoe | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040076028 | Achleitner et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040125618 | De Rooij et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040201933 | Blanc | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207366 | Sung | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050002214 | Deng et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050006958 | Dubovsky | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050162121 | Chan | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172995 | Rohrig | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050225090 | Wobben | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050226017 | Kotsopoulos et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050275386 | Jepsen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060192540 | Balakrishnan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070019613 | Frezzolini | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070133241 | Mumtaz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20100264736 | Mumtaz et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20130234518 | Mumtaz et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2073800 | Sep 2000 | AU |
2063243 | Dec 1991 | CA |
2394761 | Jun 2001 | CA |
1262552 | Aug 2000 | CN |
3729000 | Mar 1989 | DE |
4032569 | Apr 1992 | DE |
4325436 | Feb 1995 | DE |
4328511 | Mar 1995 | DE |
19502762 | Aug 1996 | DE |
19538946 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19609189 | Sep 1997 | DE |
19618882 | Nov 1997 | DE |
19904561 | Aug 2000 | DE |
19961705 | Jul 2001 | DE |
10136147 | Feb 2003 | DE |
0231211 | Aug 1987 | EP |
420295 | Apr 1991 | EP |
827254 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0895146 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0947905 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1024575 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1035640 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1039620 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1239576 | Sep 2002 | EP |
2819653 | Jul 2002 | FR |
1261838 | Jan 1972 | GB |
H04364378 | Dec 1992 | JP |
H08185235 | Jul 1996 | JP |
H1075580 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11041832 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11103538 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11206038 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11318042 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000166097 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000174307 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000307144 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000316282 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000347753 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000358330 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001224142 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002073184 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002354677 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003134661 | May 2003 | JP |
2003134667 | May 2003 | JP |
2004055603 | Feb 2004 | JP |
1011483 | Sep 2000 | NL |
1996007130 | Mar 1996 | WO |
0021178 | Apr 2000 | WO |
02093655 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03012569 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report from PCT/US04/16668, form PCT/ISA/220, filed May 27, 2004. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 13/785,857, dated Jun. 6, 2013. |
Partial Extended European Search Report, EP Application 04753488.8, dated Feb. 2, 2015. |
Extended European Search Report, EP Application 04753488.8, dated Apr. 29, 2015. |
The International Search Report (Form PCT /ISA/220) Issued in corresponding international application No. PCT/US04/16668, filed May 27, 2004. |
Wiles, John, “Photovoltaic Power Systems and the National Electrical Code: Suggested Practices,” Sandia National Laboratories, document No. SAND2001-0674, Mar. 2001. |
Matsui, et al., “A New Maximum Photovoltaic Power Tracking Control Scheme Based on Power Equilibrium at DC Link”, IEEE, 1999, pp. 804-809. |
Quaschning, “Cost Effectiveness of Shadow Tolerant Photovoltaic Systems”, Berlin University of Technology, Institute of Electrical Energy Technology, Renewable Energy Section. EuroSun '96, pp. 819-824. |
Lindgren, “Topology for Decentralised Solar Energy Inverters with a Low Voltage AC-Bus”, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Electrical Power Engineering, EPE '99—Lausanne. |
Enslin, “Integrated Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking Converter”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 44, No. 6, Dec. 1997, pp. 769-773. |
Wallace, et al., “DSP Controlled Buck/Boost Power Factor Correction for Telephony Rectifiers”, Telecommunications Energy Conference 2001, INTELEC 2001, Twenty-Third International, Oct. 18, 2001, pp. 132-138. |
John Xue, “PV Module Series String Balancing Converters”, University of Queensland—School of Information Technology & Electrical Engineering, Nov. 6, 2002. |
Sandia Report SAND96-2797 I C-1290 Unlimited Release, Printed Dec. 1996, “Photovoltaic Power Systems and The National Electrical Code: Suggested Practices”, by John Wiles, Southwest Technology Development Institute New Mexico State University Las Cruces, NM. |
Nayar, C.V., M. Ashari and W.W.L Keerthiphala, “A Gridinteractive Photovoltaic Uninterruptible Power Supply System Using Battery Storage and a Back up Diesel Generator”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 15, No. 3, Sep. 2000, pp. 348?353. |
Yeong-Chau Kuo et al., Novel Maximum-Power-Point-Tracking Controller for Photovoltaic Energy Conversion System, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 48, No. 3, Jun. 2001. |
Woyte, et al., “Mains Monitoring and Protection in a European Context”, 17th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Munich, Germany, Oct. 22-26, 2001, Achim, Woyte, et al., pp. 1-4. |
Meinhardt, Mike, et al., “Multi-String-Converter with Reduced Specific Costs and Enhanced Functionality,” Solar Energy, May 21, 2001, pp. 217-227, vol. 69, Elsevier Science Ltd. |
Calais, Martina, et al. “Inverters for single-phase grid connected photovoltaic systems—an overview.” Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2002. pesc 02.2002 IEEE 33rd Annual. vol. 4. IEEE, 2002. |
Gow Ja A et al: “A Modular DC-DC Converter and Maximum Power Tracking Controller Formedium to Large Scale Photovoltaic Generating Plant”8<SUP>th </SUP> European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. Lausaane, CH, Sep. 7-9, 1999, EPE. European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Brussls: EPE Association, BE, vol. Conf. 8, Sep. 7, 1999, pp. 1-8, XP000883026. |
Walker, “Cascaded DC-DC Converter Connection of Photovoltaic Modules”, 33rd Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. PESC 2002. Conference Proceedings. CAIRNS, Queensland, Australia, Jun. 23-27, 2002; [Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference], New York, NY: IEEE US, vol. 1, Jun. 23, 2002, pp. 24-29, XP010596060 ISBN: 978-0-7803-7262-7, figure 1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160248257 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60473749 | May 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13282037 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 15052633 | US | |
Parent | 10556764 | US | |
Child | 13282037 | US |