The standard gate valve is used in mines, factories, power plants, and other places all over the world. The gate is designed to start or stop the flow of fluids and slurries, and more rarely to regulate flow rate. The working component of the gate is a plane or wedge which slides into place perpendicular to the flow within a pipe valve. When lowered, the plane blocks the flow; when raised, the plane allows the fluid to flow unrestricted. When a gate valve is used to regulate the flow, partially raising or lowering the gate will change flow rate.
In the prior art, a typical example of a gate valve is lowered by turning a wrench or handle about a threaded shaft. The handle is mated to a rotatable bushing and threaded nut in such a way that the handle does not move up or down. The threaded shaft is mated to the gate such that it cannot rotate; as a result, turning the handle causes the shaft to raise or lower rather than rotating; the rotating wheel or wrench is not raised or lowered during normal operation. Due to cost or to conditions in the valve's environment, manually operated valves remain prevalent in the industry and will remain so for the foreseeable future. However, manually-operated valves face continuing problems due to the effort involved in their operation. Slurries and acids tend to foul working surfaces and shaft threads and make the valves increasingly difficult to operate. Even under normal conditions, turning the valves is a physically-demanding task that may take ten or fifteen minutes.
Mines in particular are sensitive to the problems of manual valves in conditions prohibitive to electric valves. Slurries contain sediments, acids, and other byproducts of the ore concentrate which can quickly foul a threaded shaft beyond use in the uncontrolled outdoor or underground environments common to mines. Industry practice is to simply replace the valves on a regular basis; as such, mines have the frequent opportunity to update their valve technology, but no new valves have been introduced which adequately address the problems of the current design. A heretofore unaddressed need exists for a device which can ameliorate these issues.
Another example of prior art includes knife gates, which have a narrower gate blocking the flow through the valve but otherwise operates on a similar principle—the shaft does not rotate with the handle; rather, torque applied to the handle moves the shaft up and down with the gate. A typical example of a prior art knife gate comprises four struts supporting a threaded mount. The shaft passes through the threaded mount and extends down to the valve body where it immovably mates with the knife gate. A handle is mounted onto the shaft outside of the threaded mount; just like the gate valve, torque applied to the handle applies forces through the threading on the threaded mount and the threaded portion of the shaft to move the shaft and gate up or down without rotating the shaft.
The power-driven gate valve presents a solution to the difficulties of turning these heavy valves. In the preferred embodiment, top end of the threaded shaft is a hexagonal head that can be mated with an attachment to a rotary tool. The preferred embodiment is designed for use with impact drills because that type of rotary tool can shake sediment and other impediments from the threads of the threaded shaft, but any sort of handheld drill or other rotary tool will suffice. The lower end of the shaft is reshaped with a rounded head that rotatably mates with the gate rather than remaining fixed.
In the preferred embodiment, the top of the shaft comprises a hex head which can be mated to an impact drill attachment. This tool gives the worker the ability to exert much greater power than the worker could exert by hand, but is not stationary like a built-in electric motorized valve. Impact drills are preferred over other types of rotary tools because the impact action will tend to loosen the valve's moving parts by shaking out corrosion or sediments. The ability to use a rotary tool such as an impact drill saves time and effort, increasing efficiency for mines and other facilities. In the event that an impact drill is unavailable, workers can still mate a wrench or wheel to the hex head and turn the shaft manually, so the present invention comprises no loss of function over the old technology. However, unlike the typical prior art, the wheel in the present invention will be raised and lowered during operation as the hex head of the shaft rises or falls.
The bottom of the threaded shaft and the top of the gate are configured to rotatably mate with one another. In the preferred embodiment, the lower end of the threaded shaft comprises a round section at the bottommost end of the threaded shaft. Above the bottommost end is a section of the shaft with a smaller diameter than the rest of the shaft. The gate is shaped with a cutout slot around its perimeter; the cutout slot at its narrowest is preferably slightly wider than the round section of the threaded shaft. The cutout slot is also preferably slightly wider at its widest than the maximum diameter of the threaded shaft. The threaded shaft's round section is mated to the cutout portion of the plane such that the shaft can rotate and apply upward or downward force to the plane. When the threaded shaft rotates in its housing, it travels up or down according to its direction of rotation. The gate is restricted to upward or downward motion within its frame. When the two parts are mated together, the threaded shaft's rotation raises or lowers both the shaft and the gate within the valve. The threads of the threaded shaft interact with threads in the fixed shaft bushing rather than in a rotatable bushing, handle, and nut. As a result of this design, the shaft rotates as it moves up and down against the threads of the bushing. This action stands in contrast to the prior art where a shaft moves up and down without rotating and all rotational force is directed up and down by the threading on a non-rotating shaft mated to a plane, said plane being free to move only up or down. The use of a rotating shaft in the preferred embodiment of the present invention enables the use of the hex head and impact drill components described above. Without the features of the present invention, use of a handheld drill is impractical.
An alternate embodiment of the powered gate valve is a powered knife gate valve. The powered knife gate valve comprises a thin knife gate and a thin housing to stop or regulate fluid and slurry flow through the pipe. As with the gate valve, the knife gate valve comprises a shaft and is designed such that said shaft rotates. The bottom portion of the shaft rotatably mates with the top portion of the knife gate. In the prior art, the shaft is fixed to the knife gate. In contrast, this embodiment of the present invention encloses the bottom portion of the shaft in a coupling, said coupling comprising two parts which are fixed to the knife gate. The shaft can rotate freely within the coupling but cannot be separated from said coupling without first disassembling the coupling.
Further alternate embodiments may fashion the hex head with a different number of sides; for example, a four-sided square head, or a five-sided pentagonal head. More sides tend to increase the head's durability, while fewer sides tend to make the head easier to torque. The hex head remains the preferred embodiment both for its balance of durability and torque and in order to make the present invention compatible with existing tool bits.
Yet further alternate embodiments would incorporate the rotating threaded shaft, hex head, and any variants thereof into the designs of other types of gate valves such as globe valves, ball valves, butterfly valves, and others.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the power-driven gate valve will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the following more particular description of the invention and the accompanying illustrations.
The threaded shaft 600 comprises a rounded bottom end 630 and rounded cutout 640 at its lower end. The rounded cutout 640 allows the rotatable mating of flanges 210 from the gate 200 in order to pull the gate 200 upward, while the rounded bottom end 630 presses directly on the gate 200 in order to push the gate 200 downward. The flanges 210 may include planar sidewalls on the sides of the gate 200. The flanges 210 may be spaced apart from one another along an axis orthogonal to a flow within the pipe 100. This spacing may allow a user to slide the rounded bottom end 630 of the threaded shaft 600 into or out of the flanges 210 in the direction orthogonal to a flow within the pipe 100 when the threaded shaft 600 and the gate 200 are not assembled within the gate valve 10.
An alternate embodiment of the present invention is the knife gate valve 80 shown in
The top portion 620 is also visible in its preferred hex shape. The two halves of the coupling 870 preferably comprise a grease insert 860 to maintain the smooth movement of the threaded shaft 600.
The embodiments of the present invention described above, particularly the preferred embodiments, merely set forth a clear understanding of the principles of the invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments of the invention without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present invention and protected by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
377611 | Harley | Feb 1888 | A |
2000853 | Lange | May 1935 | A |
2060571 | Hanson | Nov 1936 | A |
2075123 | Lunken | Mar 1937 | A |
2550984 | Ferguson | May 1951 | A |
2797062 | Otter | Jun 1957 | A |
2891762 | Kellogg | Jun 1959 | A |
2936667 | Thorberg | May 1960 | A |
3033517 | Rovang | May 1962 | A |
3319661 | Shindler | May 1967 | A |
3710816 | Prince | Jan 1973 | A |
3749114 | Johnstone | Jul 1973 | A |
D248824 | Imai | Aug 1978 | S |
D256947 | Terrazas | Sep 1980 | S |
4326557 | Behle | Apr 1982 | A |
D265174 | Boyle | Jun 1982 | S |
D273460 | Sturm | Apr 1984 | S |
4532957 | Battle | Aug 1985 | A |
D289915 | Beltran | May 1987 | S |
4679770 | Liberman | Jul 1987 | A |
4928919 | Daicho | May 1990 | A |
D310956 | Huska | Oct 1990 | S |
D318316 | Hengesbach | Jul 1991 | S |
5269340 | Drzewiecki | Dec 1993 | A |
D352656 | Rodman | Nov 1994 | S |
D353147 | Bergman | Dec 1994 | S |
D353562 | Ewers | Dec 1994 | S |
5370149 | Clarkson | Dec 1994 | A |
D368019 | Ohtsuka | Mar 1996 | S |
5653423 | Young | Aug 1997 | A |
5657961 | Kalsi | Aug 1997 | A |
5722450 | Julicher | Mar 1998 | A |
5829734 | Freudendahl | Nov 1998 | A |
5979874 | Gambetta | Nov 1999 | A |
5992440 | Betz | Nov 1999 | A |
D426766 | Burchall | Jun 2000 | S |
D434148 | Trocar | Nov 2000 | S |
D446219 | Miyoshi | Aug 2001 | S |
6422535 | Stone | Jul 2002 | B1 |
D499010 | Velten | Nov 2004 | S |
D536100 | Svedberg | Jan 2007 | S |
D563216 | Suehiro | Mar 2008 | S |
D576027 | Lanz | Sep 2008 | S |
D585730 | Fernandez | Feb 2009 | S |
D589786 | Suehiro | Apr 2009 | S |
D590703 | Suehiro | Apr 2009 | S |
D592043 | Suehiro | May 2009 | S |
7537198 | Petersen | May 2009 | B2 |
D614941 | Murphy | May 2010 | S |
D631736 | You | Feb 2011 | S |
D639152 | Watts | Jun 2011 | S |
D698634 | Oetlinger | Feb 2014 | S |
D757900 | Yakushijin | May 2016 | S |
D779930 | Chen | Feb 2017 | S |
10060115 | Miller | Aug 2018 | B2 |
D842084 | Roebrugh | Mar 2019 | S |
D847595 | Hampton | May 2019 | S |
D854919 | Villanueva | Jul 2019 | S |
20030062502 | Knobbe | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040217319 | Reeves | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050098756 | Gravningen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050173667 | Zheng | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060118380 | Aeberhard | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060237681 | Petersen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070251579 | Weide | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090232619 | Baumgartner | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100264350 | Langmesser | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110001076 | Sidler | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110083747 | Orino | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130180612 | Morrison | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140332707 | Reilly | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150308083 | Qingwei | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160138721 | Burgess | May 2016 | A1 |
20160327198 | Sundrla | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170016551 | Villanueva | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170067573 | Herman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180180186 | Kim | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180281029 | Maichel | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180363786 | Sundrla | Dec 2018 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 29/693,097 dated Jun. 1, 2020 (27 pgs). |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/693,097, filed May 30, 2019, Villanueva. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170016551 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62165946 | May 2015 | US |