The present invention relates to devices and methods for neural stimulation, and particularly but not exclusively to auditory prostheses.
Wearable medical devices reliant upon stored power share a common dynamic. As the possible and desired functionality of the devices is improved, the power demands generally also increase. As a result, the life per charge or per cell is reduced, which has not only a cost impact for the user, but also increases the risk that a device will power down at an inconvenient time.
In the field of cochlear implants, this issue is exacerbated by the trend to a single, behind the ear unit to replace what was once a head mounted unit and a separate speech processor unit worn on the body. The available volume and weight for the power cell is accordingly reduced. Increased power demands to provide improved functionality create a need to consider the efficiency of speech processing schemes and stimulus sets in order to provide maximum battery life.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved processing method and device, in order to a better balance of power consumption and performance in neural stimulation systems, particularly auditory prostheses.
The present invention provides, broadly, for a scheme in which masking effects are taken into account when determining which stimuli are actually delivered to a patient. This may be implemented in various ways. In one approach, after a set of stimulus instructions is generated, the set is checked against a look-up table. This table contains combinations of stimuli which have previously been clinically determined for that patent to display a masking effect. The second stimulus is deleted in this case.
In another approach, a theoretical model of masking could be used in addition to or instead of a look up table.
According to one aspect, the present invention relates to a method of neural stimulation of the type in which successive stimuli are presented on an electrode array having one or more electrodes, said stimuli being generated by a stimulus generation device, the method including the steps of:
According to another aspect, the present invention provides a neural stimulator device, including a stimulus generation device for generating stimulus sets for one or more periods, said stimulus sets being intended for delivery at an electrode array for operatively presenting stimuli to neural structures,
wherein said device further includes processing means implementing a predetermined instruction set, said processing means analysing each stimulus set using said predetermined instruction set in order to locate factors indicative of a likely masking effect, and if it is determined that a masking effect is likely, altering said stimulus set.
The stimulus set may include a single stimulus in which case only the variable parameters relevant to that type of stimulation need to be specified. In suitable devices, this may include the timing, waveform, frequency, current, voltage, phase, amplitude and electrode location or further factors as required. The instruction set in this case preferably will consider the stimuli previously delivered in determining whether a masking effect is likely.
Alternatively, the stimulus set may include multiple stimuli, with variables as discussed above. If this case, in addition to or instead of previous stimulus sets, the instruction set will preferably analyse the various stimuli in relation to each other.
The stimulus generation device may be unitary or be made of physically distinct parts. For example, in the case of a cochlear implant, it may include both an external speech processor and an implanted device, only the speech processor, or only an implanted device, depending upon the desired location of processing capacity. The instruction set may be implanted as a separate procedure, or integrated within the processor which generates the stimulus set.
In a preferred form, if analysis indicates a likelihood of masking, the masked stimulus is simply omitted. However, in a system such as a cochlear implant, where stimuli are presented on multiple electrodes, an alternative stimuli—for example, on a different electrode—may be substituted. For example, the next most significant sound channel may be selected as the basis for stimulation.
In the case of the intra-cochlear implant, it has been observed that certain stimuli, when delivered simultaneously or in close succession, do not produce a patient percept significantly different from when only the first stimulus is delivered. For example, consider a conventional, multi-electrode intra-cochlear electrode array. If a large amplitude stimulus is delivered at one electrode, and simultaneously a smaller amplitude stimulus is delivered at the next electrode, then in many cases the user will not be able to perceive whether or not the smaller stimulus was delivered—it is said to be masked by the large stimulus. Other circumstances may give rise to masking of various neural percepts. Masking phenomena have been discussed in the technical literature.
The present invention arises from a recognition that masking effects can be considered as indicating a waste of stimulation power, as although the stimulus is presented to the patient, the patient does not receive any increased perception as a result of the stimulus. Accordingly, a proportion of the stimulus energy is simply wasted.
An implementation of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
The present invention will be described with particular reference to a speech processor unit for a cochlear implant system. However, it will be appreciated that the present invention has application to other neural stimulation systems where the masking phenomenon may be relevant.
Referring to
The implanted component 5 includes a receiver coil 6 for receiving power and data from coil 3. A cable 7 extends from the implanted device 5 to the cochlea 12 and terminates in an electrode array 10. The signals thus received are applied by the array 10 to the basilar membrane 8 thereby stimulating the auditory nerve. The operation of the device shown in
Thus, the RF link, which is in turn powered by the speech processor 1, provides power and data to the implanted device 6. The speech processor also processes sound signals received by microphone 2, so as to send appropriate instructions for stimulation to the implanted device 6. The precise details of speech processing are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention, and are in any case well understood by those skilled in the art. Any suitable speech processing strategy could be used in conjunction with the present invention.
The block diagram of
Sound signals are detected by microphone 20, and processed into a predetermined number of frequency channels by filter 21. The output of filter 21 is a set of signal amplitudes per channel 22. Processor 23, in simple terms, selects certain channels as the basis for stimulation, based on amplitude or other factors. A set of stimulation instructions for implanted receiver stimulator unit 28 is thereby produced.
These instructions include at least the electrode or electrodes to be stimulated, and the amplitude of the stimulus to be applied. The process so far is conventional.
Masking check involves comparing each successive two or more stimuli with the look-up table to determine whether they match a predetermined masking rule in look-up table 26.
The table below sets out a set of minimum unmasked level—that is, for one electrode n, the level which will not be masked, as a function of the stimulus levels which have been applied to the other electrodes within the previous 2m5. The electrode column lists the electrodes in an array of n max electrodes. Each entry M gives the minimum stimulus level (amplitude) to electrode n which will elicit a response immediately following a stimulus to the relevant electrodes, expressed as values between threshold (T) and maximum comfortable (c) levels. It will be appreciated that T and C levels are routinely determined during set up of a speech processor.
The masking check output is thus the stimulation set, with masked stimuli excluded. This is then transmitted conventionally, for example via an RF link to the implanted receiver/stimulator unit, which operates conventionally.
Variations and additions will be apparent to those skilled in the art with the broad scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PQ9528 | Aug 2000 | AU | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/343,397, filed Feb. 21, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,272,446 which was a National Stage application of International Application PCT/AU01/01032, filed Aug. 21, 2001, and which claims the benefit of Australian Patent Application PQ 9528, filed Aug. 21, 2000, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4441202 | Tong et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4515158 | Patrick et al. | May 1985 | A |
4532930 | Crosby et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4611596 | Wasserman | Sep 1986 | A |
4847617 | Silvian | Jul 1989 | A |
5046242 | Kuzma | Sep 1991 | A |
5271397 | Seligman et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274711 | Rutledge et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5403262 | Gooch | Apr 1995 | A |
5412748 | Furuyama et al. | May 1995 | A |
5601617 | Loeb et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609616 | Schulman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5626629 | Faltys et al. | May 1997 | A |
5649970 | Loeb et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653742 | Parker et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5687282 | Van De Kerkhof | Nov 1997 | A |
5776179 | Ren et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786439 | Van Antwerp et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5824022 | Zilberman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833714 | Loeb | Nov 1998 | A |
5853424 | Rise | Dec 1998 | A |
5895416 | Barreras, Sr. et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5909497 | Alexandrescu | Jun 1999 | A |
6115478 | Schneider | Sep 2000 | A |
6116413 | Tabor et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6198971 | Leysieffer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230057 | Chow et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6304786 | Heil, Jr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304787 | Kuzma et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321126 | Kuzma | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334072 | Leysieffer | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354299 | Fischell et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366863 | Bye et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6421569 | Treaba et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6463328 | John | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497729 | Moussy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537200 | Leysieffer et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6565503 | Leysieffer et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575894 | Leysieffer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6594525 | Zierhofer | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6697674 | Leysieffer et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6751505 | Van Den Honert et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6778040 | Kim | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778858 | Peeters | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6879693 | Miller | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6916291 | Givens et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7171272 | Blamey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181297 | Pluvinage et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7218971 | Heil, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7251530 | Overstreet et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7272446 | Parker et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7317944 | Overstreet | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7328151 | Muesch | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7822478 | Killian et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20010050837 | Stevenson et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020176584 | Kates | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030109903 | Berrang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030199950 | Stolz et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233133 | Greenberg et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040098063 | Goetz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127968 | Kuzma et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147992 | Bluger et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060004432 | Parker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070127745 | Gibson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090204177 | Parker et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090292161 | Parker | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005202733 | Jan 2006 | AU |
0247649 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0282336 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0124930 | Jun 1990 | EP |
61001200 | Jan 1986 | JP |
63242252 | Oct 1988 | JP |
8501241 | Feb 1996 | JP |
10508442 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-513539 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000509566 | Jul 2000 | JP |
9324176 | Dec 1993 | WO |
9501709 | Jan 1995 | WO |
9612383 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO-9626673 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9709863 | Mar 1997 | WO |
9743871 | Nov 1997 | WO |
9748447 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9965276 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0103622 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0119304 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0199470 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-0217679 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080051853 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10343397 | US | |
Child | 11857253 | US |