Power efficient multiplexer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9531361
  • Patent Number
    9,531,361
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 13, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 27, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A power efficient multiplexer. In accordance with a first embodiment, a power efficient multiplexer comprises a transmission gate structure for selectively passing one of a plurality of input signals and a stacked inverter circuit for inverting the one of a plurality of input signals. Both the stacked inverter and the transmission gate provide beneficial reductions in static power consumption in comparison to conventional multiplexer designs.
Description
FIELD

Embodiments relate to power efficient multiplexers.


BACKGROUND

Static power consumption in modern semiconductor processes, e.g., processes with a minimum feature size of about 0.13 microns and smaller, is no longer a negligible component of total power consumption. For such processes, static power may be one-half of total power consumption. Further, static power, as a percentage of total power, is tending to increase with successive generations of semiconductor process. Consequently, circuit elements that are efficient in terms of static power consumption are highly desired. One commonly utilized circuit element is a multiplexer. In general, a multiplexer selects among several inputs to propagate to its output. For example, variable delay circuits generally require a series of multiplexers to select between a signal present at a desired tap of the delay circuit and a signal propagating from beyond a desired tap.


SUMMARY

A power efficient multiplexer is disclosed. In accordance with a first embodiment, a power efficient multiplexer comprises a transmission gate structure for selectively passing one of a plurality of input signals and a stacked inverter circuit for inverting the one of a plurality of input signals.


In accordance with another embodiment, the plurality of electronic signals is accessed. A method of selecting one electronic signal from a plurality of electronic signals is disclosed. A plurality of transmission gates is configured to select one electronic signal from the plurality of electronic signals. The one electronic signal is inverted utilizing a stacked inverter circuit


In accordance with still another embodiment, an electronic circuit comprises a stacked inverter circuit. The stacked inverter circuit comprises at least two devices of a first type coupled in series. These devices are coupled in series to a group of at least two devices of an opposite type coupled in series. The electronic circuit further comprises a first conductance terminal of a first transmission gate coupled to a first electronic signal and a first conductance terminal of a second transmission gate coupled to a second electronic signal. The second conductance terminals of the first and second transmission gates are coupled to an input of the stacked inverter circuit. The first control terminal of a semiconductor type of the first transmission gate is coupled to a second control terminal of opposite semiconductor type of the second transmission gate. The second control terminal of the opposite semiconductor type of the first transmission gate is coupled to a first control terminal of the semiconductor type of the second transmission gate.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic of a novel power efficient multiplexer, in accordance with embodiments.



FIG. 2 illustrates a flow chart for a method 200 of selecting one electronic signal from a plurality of electronic signals, in accordance with embodiments.



FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 illustrate it is possible to stack different numbers of transistors on either or both legs of a stacked inverter in accordance with embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the disclosure will be described in conjunction with these embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the disclosure to these embodiments. On the contrary, the disclosure is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that embodiments may be practiced without these specific details.


Power Efficient Multiplexer


Embodiments are described in the context of design and operation of integrated semiconductors. More particularly, embodiments relate to power efficient multiplexers. It is appreciated, however, that embodiments may be utilized in other areas of semiconductor design and operation.


The following description of embodiments is directed toward pFETs (or p-type metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETS)) formed in surface N-wells and/or nFETs (or n-type MOSFETS) formed in surface P-wells when a p-type substrate and an N-well process are utilized. It is to be appreciated, however, that embodiments are equally applicable to nFETs (or n-type MOSFETS) formed in surface P-wells and/or pFETs (or p-type MOSFETS) formed in surface N-wells when an n-type substrate and a P-well process are utilized. Consequently, embodiments are well suited to semiconductors formed in both p-type and n-type materials, and such embodiments are considered within the scope of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic of a novel power efficient multiplexer 100, in accordance with embodiments. Power efficient multiplexer 100 comprises an inverter 110 and a transmission gate structure 120. Transmission gate structure 120 comprises transmission gates 121 and 122.


A bit value in latch 130 determines whether transmission gate 121 is “open” or “closed,” for example whether transmission gate 121 passes a signal or not. Similarly, the bit value in latch 130 determines whether transmission gate 122 passes a signal or not. Both transmission gates 121 and 122 are controlled by the same bit value and that bit value's complement. Consequently, either transmission gate 122 will pass a signal, or transmission gate 121 will pass a signal, but not both simultaneously.


For example, in the embodiment of FIG. 1, a zero value in latch 130 will cause transmission gate 121 to pass signal A 125, while causing transmission gate 122 not to pass any signals. Consequently, transmission gate structure 120 will select signal A 125 corresponding to a zero value in latch 130.


Similarly, a one value in latch 130 will cause transmission gate 122 to pass signal B 126, while causing transmission gate 121 not to pass any signals. Consequently, transmission gate structure 120 will select signal B 126 corresponding to a one value in latch 130.


The signal, A 125 or B 126, selected by transmission gate structure 120 is inverted by inverter 110 to produce output 140 of power efficient multiplexer 100.


It is to be appreciated that static power consumption in modern semiconductor processes, e.g., processes with a minimum feature size of about 0.13 microns and smaller, is no longer a negligible component of total power consumption. For such processes, static power may be one-half of total power consumption. Further, static power, as a percentage of total power, is tending to increase with successive generations of semiconductor process.


Advantageously, inverter 110 comprises stacked field effect transistors (FETs). In general, an inverter stage, whether conventional or stacked, forms a leakage path, e.g., a series “string” of devices coupled from operating voltage (Vdd) to ground. As current leaks through such leakage paths, static power is consumed by the inverter stage. As described more completely in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/864,271, entitled “Stacked Inverter Delay Chain” to Masleid and Burr, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, an inverter comprising stacked field effect transistors can consume less static power than a conventional inverter to produce a comparable delay.


Further, such leakage paths within a stacked inverter suffer less leakage than a conventional inverter, yielding additional beneficial leakage reductions. In a conventional inverter, exactly one transistor is on while the other transistor is off. As an unfortunate consequence, approximately the full bias voltage is applied to the off transistor, resulting in a maximum possible leakage for the off transistor.


In contrast, in a stacked inverter multiple transistors are either on or off in series. For example, in the embodiment of FIG. 1, for a “high” state, two transistors are on, while two transistors are off. Consequently, each “off” transistor has significantly less than full bias voltage applied. It is appreciated that leakage current generally decreases exponentially as voltage decreases. For example, a factor of two reduction in off bias voltage produces about a factor of eight reduction in leakage current per leakage path.


It is to be further appreciated that such leakage induces non zero voltages at intermediate nodes between the off transistors. Such voltages induce body effects in the transistors. Such body effects increase the threshold voltage of the affected transistors. An increased threshold voltage generally produces beneficial decreases in leakage current.


Consequently, in addition to a decrease in a number of leakage paths, in accordance with embodiments, the leakage current of each path is very beneficially reduced due to an induced body effect and a highly non-linear relationship between bias voltage and leakage current. Thus, inverter 110 significantly reduces static power consumption, in comparison to a conventional inverter.


It is to be appreciated that more or fewer stacked FETs can be can be included in inverter 110 in order to achieve differing signal propagation and/or power characteristics, in accordance with embodiments.


For example, physical differences between electrons and holes, and between n-type and p-type dopants, as well as constructive differences in device geometry and dopant placement, result in differences in efficiency between n-type devices and p-type devices. Because electron mobility is higher than hole mobility, n-type devices are more efficient than p-type devices. However, the degree of difference depends on constructive differences that can vary with process. Such physical and constructive differences also produce other behavior differences, such as a difference in sensitivity to body effects. Consequently, different levels of benefit, e.g., in leakage reduction, are to be expected between stacks of n-type devices and stacks of p-type devices. To allow for such effects, in accordance with embodiments, it is possible to stack different numbers of transistors on either or both legs of a stacked inverter (e.g., FIG. 3 and FIG. 4). Such variations allow increases in load and/or decreases in drive capability, enabling a wide variety of loading and drive characteristics, as well as enabling differing body effects.


Also of benefit in reducing power consumption, particularly static power consumption, of power efficient multiplexer 100 is transmission gate structure 120. It is to be appreciated that transmission gates, for example transmission gates 121 and 122, are characterized as having no direct path between power (Vdd) and ground. Consequently, transmission gates are characterized as having extremely small leakage, and thus very little static power consumption.


It is appreciated that a variety of factors, e.g., operating voltage, operating temperature and/or manufacturing process variations, can affect the speed of operation of an integrated circuit. It is generally desirable for a multiplexer to track speed changes of other circuitry of an integrated circuit. For example, if other circuits of an integrated circuit operate faster, generally a multiplexer is required to select a desired signal more quickly in order for the overall circuit to function. Because embodiments comprise stacked devices, they are similar to many logic circuits that also comprise stacked devices, e.g., NAND and/or NOR logic gates. Consequently, embodiments match or track changes in operating speed of complex logic more accurately than multiplexers comprising very simple inverters.


It is to be appreciated that embodiments are well suited to selecting among more than the two signals illustrated in FIG. 1, and embodiments comprising more than two selectable signals are to be considered within the scope of the disclosure.


Embodiments are thus shown to offer significant and highly beneficial improvements in tracking timing changes of other circuits and in static power (leakage current) consumption in comparison to the conventional art.



FIG. 2 illustrates a flow chart for a method 200 of selecting one electronic signal from a plurality of electronic signals, in accordance with embodiments. In 210, the plurality of electronic signals is accessed. For example, referring to FIG. 1, the plurality of electronic signals is accessed at transmission gates 121 and 122.


In 220, a plurality of transmission gates is configured to select one electronic signal from the plurality of electronic signals. For example, referring to FIG. 1, a zero value in latch 130 will cause transmission gate 121 to pass signal A 125, while causing transmission gate 122 not to pass any signals. Consequently, transmission gate structure 120 will select signal A 125 corresponding to a zero value in latch 130.


In 230, the one electronic signal is inverted utilizing a stacked inverter circuit, for example stacked inverter circuit 110 of FIG. 1.


The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the disclosure and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the disclosure and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the disclosure be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A circuit, comprising: a transmission gate structure including a plurality of input nodes and an output node operable to output a signal; anda stacked inverter including: an inverter input node coupled to the output node;a low-to-high transition leg directly coupled to the output node to receive the signal and comprising a first number of transistors;a high-to-low transition leg directly coupled to the output node to receive the signal and comprising a second number of transistors that is different relative to the first number of transistors; andan inverter output node coupled to the low-to-high transition leg and to the high-to-low transition leg.
  • 2. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the first number of transistors is greater than the second number of transistors.
  • 3. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the first number of transistors is less than the second number of transistors.
  • 4. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the first number of transistors comprises p-type transistors, and wherein each p-type transistor includes a respective gate coupled to the inverter input node.
  • 5. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the second number of transistors comprises n-type transistors, and wherein each n-type transistor includes a respective gate coupled to the inverter input node.
  • 6. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the stacked inverter is operable to provide at the inverter output node an inverted version of an input value at a selected one of the plurality of input nodes.
  • 7. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the transmission gate structure further comprises: a first transmission gate coupled between a first input node of the plurality of input nodes and the output node; anda second transmission gate coupled between a second input node of the plurality of input nodes and the output node.
  • 8. A circuit, comprising: a plurality of input nodes;an intermediate node;a plurality of transmission gates coupled to a respective one of the plurality of input nodes and coupled to the intermediate node that is operable to receive a signal from at least one of the transmission gates; anda stacked inverter including: an inverter input node coupled to the intermediate node;a low-to-high transition leg directly coupled to the intermediate node to receive the signal and comprising a first number of transistors;a high-to-low transition leg directly coupled to the intermediate node to receive the signal and comprising a second number of transistors that is different relative to the first number of transistors; andan inverter output node coupled to the low-to-high transition leg and to the high-to-low transition leg.
  • 9. The circuit of claim 8, wherein the stacked inverter is operable to provide at the inverter output node an inverted version of an input value at a selected one of the plurality of input nodes.
  • 10. The circuit of claim 8, wherein the first number of transistors is greater than the second number of transistors.
  • 11. The circuit of claim 8, wherein the first number of transistors is less than the second number of transistors.
  • 12. The circuit of claim 8, wherein the first number of transistors comprises p-type transistors, and wherein each p-type transistor includes a respective gate coupled to the inverter input node.
  • 13. The circuit of claim 8, wherein the second number of transistors comprises n-type transistors, and wherein each n-type transistor includes a respective gate coupled to the inverter input node.
  • 14. A circuit, comprising: a latch;a transmission gate structure including a plurality of input nodes, an output node operable to output a signal, and a plurality of control nodes coupled to the latch; anda stacked inverter including: an inverter input node coupled to the output node;a low-to-high transition leg directly coupled to the output node to receive the signal and comprising a first number of transistors;a high-to-low transition leg directly coupled to the output node to receive the signal and comprising a second number of transistors that is different relative to the first number of transistors; andan inverter output node coupled to the low-to-high transition leg and to the high-to-low transition leg.
  • 15. The circuit of claim 14, wherein the stacked inverter is operable to provide at the inverter output node an inverted version of an input value at a selected one of the plurality of input nodes.
  • 16. The circuit of claim 14, wherein the first number of transistors is greater than the second number of transistors.
  • 17. The circuit of claim 14, wherein the first number of transistors is less than the second number of transistors.
  • 18. The circuit of claim 14, wherein the first number of transistors comprises p-type transistors, and wherein each p-type transistor includes a respective gate coupled to the inverter input node.
  • 19. The circuit of claim 14, wherein the second number of transistors comprises n-type transistors, and wherein each n-type transistor includes a respective gate coupled to the inverter input node.
  • 20. The circuit of claim 14, wherein the transmission gate structure further comprises: a first transmission gate coupled to a first plurality of the plurality of control nodes and coupled between a first input node of the plurality of input nodes and the output node; anda second transmission gate coupled to a second plurality of the plurality of control nodes and coupled between a second input node of the plurality of input nodes and the output node.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/083,348, filed on Nov. 18, 2013, which a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/356,396, filed on Jan. 23, 2012, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,587,344, which is a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/397,085, filed on Mar. 3, 2009, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,102,190, which is a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,632, filed on Dec. 23, 2004, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,498,846, which is a Continuation-In-Part of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/864,271, filed on Jun. 8, 2004, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,336,103, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. This Application is related to the following commonly assigned United States Patent Applications, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,222, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,635,992, entitled “A Configurable Tapered Delay Chain with Multiple Sizes of Delay Elements” by Masleid; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,221, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,656,212, entitled “A Configurable Delay Chain with Switching Control for Tail Delay Elements” by Masleid; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,197, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,332,931, entitled “Leakage Efficient Anti-glitch Filter with Variable Delay Stages” by Masleid; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/020,746, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,310,008, entitled “A Configurable Delay Chain with Stacked Inverter Delay Elements” by Masleid; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,633, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,330,054, entitled “Leakage Efficient Anti-glitch Filter” by Masleid.

US Referenced Citations (172)
Number Name Date Kind
3900747 Yamazaki et al. Aug 1975 A
3991380 Pryor Nov 1976 A
4087044 Hofmann May 1978 A
4216390 Stewart Aug 1980 A
4437024 Wacyk Mar 1984 A
4498021 Uya Feb 1985 A
4508983 Allgood et al. Apr 1985 A
4568842 Koike Feb 1986 A
4578600 Magee Mar 1986 A
4651030 Mimoto Mar 1987 A
4700089 Fujii et al. Oct 1987 A
4739252 Malaviya et al. Apr 1988 A
4760279 Saito et al. Jul 1988 A
4806804 O'Leary Feb 1989 A
4808802 Kano Feb 1989 A
4853560 Iwamura et al. Aug 1989 A
4947064 Kim et al. Aug 1990 A
5039893 Tomisawa Aug 1991 A
5128560 Chern et al. Jul 1992 A
5166555 Kano Nov 1992 A
5227679 Woo Jul 1993 A
5264738 Veendrick et al. Nov 1993 A
5294845 McMahan et al. Mar 1994 A
5297086 Nasu et al. Mar 1994 A
5300835 Assar et al. Apr 1994 A
5394034 Becker et al. Feb 1995 A
5399925 Nguyen Mar 1995 A
5410278 Itoh et al. Apr 1995 A
5414312 Wong May 1995 A
5455521 Dobbelaere Oct 1995 A
5467038 Motley et al. Nov 1995 A
5497105 Oh et al. Mar 1996 A
5521530 Yao et al. May 1996 A
5525616 Platt et al. Jun 1996 A
5568103 Nakashima et al. Oct 1996 A
5587665 Jiang Dec 1996 A
5594360 Wojciechowski Jan 1997 A
5606275 Farhang et al. Feb 1997 A
5610548 Masleid Mar 1997 A
5614845 Masleid Mar 1997 A
5656963 Masleid et al. Aug 1997 A
5677650 Kwasniewski et al. Oct 1997 A
5680359 Jeong Oct 1997 A
5698994 Tsuji Dec 1997 A
5739715 Rawson Apr 1998 A
5764110 Ishibashi Jun 1998 A
5767700 Lee Jun 1998 A
5777488 Dryer et al. Jul 1998 A
5777501 AbouSeido Jul 1998 A
5778214 Taya et al. Jul 1998 A
5791715 Nebel Aug 1998 A
5793222 Nakase Aug 1998 A
5793715 Alon et al. Aug 1998 A
5796313 Eitan Aug 1998 A
5797105 Nakaya et al. Aug 1998 A
5801548 Lee et al. Sep 1998 A
5811983 Lundberg Sep 1998 A
5877632 Goetting et al. Mar 1999 A
5880608 Mehta et al. Mar 1999 A
5894419 Galambos et al. Apr 1999 A
5926050 Proebsting Jul 1999 A
5963043 Nassif Oct 1999 A
5963074 Arkin Oct 1999 A
5969543 Erickson et al. Oct 1999 A
5977763 Loughmiller et al. Nov 1999 A
5982211 Ko Nov 1999 A
6011403 Gillette Jan 2000 A
6025738 Masleid Feb 2000 A
6028490 Komatsu Feb 2000 A
6031403 Gersbach Feb 2000 A
6069506 Miller, Jr. et al. May 2000 A
6087886 Ko Jul 2000 A
6111447 Ternullo, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6114840 Farrell et al. Sep 2000 A
6127872 Kumata Oct 2000 A
6154099 Suzuki et al. Nov 2000 A
6154100 Okamoto Nov 2000 A
6160755 Norman et al. Dec 2000 A
6172545 Ishii Jan 2001 B1
6172943 Yuzuki Jan 2001 B1
6188260 Stotz et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198334 Tomobe et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204710 Goetting et al. Mar 2001 B1
6229747 Cho et al. May 2001 B1
6242936 Ho et al. Jun 2001 B1
6242937 Lee et al. Jun 2001 B1
6262601 Choe et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275091 Saeki Aug 2001 B1
6281706 Wert et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285230 Na Sep 2001 B1
6294930 Goetting et al. Sep 2001 B1
6321282 Horowitz et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323706 Stark et al. Nov 2001 B1
6366115 DiTommaso Apr 2002 B1
6407571 Furuya et al. Jun 2002 B1
6426641 Koch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426652 Greenhill et al. Jul 2002 B1
6455901 Kameyama et al. Sep 2002 B2
6459319 Sako Oct 2002 B2
6466063 Chen Oct 2002 B2
6476632 La Rosa et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489796 Tomishima Dec 2002 B2
6535014 Chetlur et al. Mar 2003 B2
6538471 Stan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6538522 Aipperspach et al. Mar 2003 B1
6545519 Carballo Apr 2003 B1
6570407 Sugisawa et al. May 2003 B1
6573774 Gardner Jun 2003 B1
6573777 Saint-Laurent et al. Jun 2003 B2
6577157 Cheung et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577176 Masleid et al. Jun 2003 B1
6621298 Agrawal et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621318 Burr Sep 2003 B1
6657504 Deal et al. Dec 2003 B1
6664837 Oh et al. Dec 2003 B1
6690242 Fang et al. Feb 2004 B2
6697929 Cherkauer et al. Feb 2004 B1
6724214 Manna et al. Apr 2004 B2
6731140 Masleid et al. May 2004 B2
6731179 Abadeer et al. May 2004 B2
6759863 Moore Jul 2004 B2
6762638 Correale, Jr. et al. Jul 2004 B2
6762966 LaRosa et al. Jul 2004 B1
6768363 Yoo et al. Jul 2004 B2
6774734 Christensen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6798230 Taylor et al. Sep 2004 B1
6815971 Wang et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815977 Sabbavarapu et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831494 Fu et al. Dec 2004 B1
6879200 Komura et al. Apr 2005 B2
6882172 Suzuki et al. Apr 2005 B1
6885210 Suzuki Apr 2005 B1
6903564 Suzuki Jun 2005 B1
6924669 Itoh et al. Aug 2005 B2
6956399 Bauer Oct 2005 B1
7053660 Itoh et al. May 2006 B2
7053680 Masleid et al. May 2006 B2
7119580 Masleid et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142018 Masleid et al. Nov 2006 B2
7172638 Robb Feb 2007 B2
7173455 Masleid et al. Feb 2007 B2
7239170 Suen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7245159 Dhong et al. Jul 2007 B2
7271638 Takai et al. Sep 2007 B2
7282958 Rhee Oct 2007 B2
7295041 Masleid et al. Nov 2007 B1
7304503 Masleid et al. Dec 2007 B2
7336103 Masleid et al. Feb 2008 B1
7525341 Rosen et al. Apr 2009 B1
7808271 Rosen et al. Oct 2010 B2
20010000426 Sung et al. Apr 2001 A1
20010028278 Ooishi Oct 2001 A1
20010030561 Asano et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010052623 Kameyama et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020056016 Horowitz et al. May 2002 A1
20020178415 Saraf Nov 2002 A1
20030005775 Washeleski et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030011413 Masleid Jan 2003 A1
20030042960 Gomm Mar 2003 A1
20030057775 Yamashita et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030160630 Earle Aug 2003 A1
20030189465 Abadeer et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030231713 Masleid et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040104731 Vollertsen Jun 2004 A1
20040119501 Sabbavarapu et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040119503 Jamshidi et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040124900 Brox Jul 2004 A1
20040148111 Gauthier et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040257115 Bertram et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050184720 Bernstein et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050212547 Suzuki Sep 2005 A1
20050248368 Bertram et al. Nov 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
1398639 Mar 2004 EP
03089624 Apr 1991 JP
04091516 Mar 1992 JP
06216723 Aug 1994 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
Chen, G et al., “Dynamic NBTI of p-MOS Transistors and its Impact on MOSFET Scaling” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-3.
Lima T., et al.; “Capacitance Coupling Immune, Transient Sensitive Accelerator for Resistive Interconnect Signals of Subquater Micron ULSI”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Inc., New York, US, vol. 31, No. 4, Apr. 1996, pp. 531-536.
Nalamalpu, et al., “Boosters for Driving Long OnChip Interconnects—Design Issues, Interconnect Synthesis, and Comparision With Repeaters”, Jan. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 21, No. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 50-62.
Oner et al., “A compact Monitoring Circuit for Real-Time On-Chip Diagnosis of Hot-Carrier Induced Degradation” Microelectronic test structures. Proceedings, IEEE International Conference in Monterey, CA. Mar. 17, 1997-Mar. 20, 1997, pp. 72-76.
Peters, Laura. “NBTI: A Growing Threat to Device Reliability,” Semiconductor International. Mar. 1, 2004 Http://www.reed-electronics.com/semiconductor/article/CA386329?industryid=3033.
Reddy. V. et al., “Impact of Negative Bias Temperature Instability on Digital Circuit Reliability”. 2002 IEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings, Dallas, TX Apr. 7, 2002-Apr. 11, 2002, pp. 248-254.
Rhyne, “Fundamentals of Digital Systems Design”, N.J., Jan. 1973, pp. 70-71.
Ryohei Kaneda, Translation of Japanese Kokai Patent Application No. HEI 3[1991]-89624, publication date: Apr. 15, 1991, pp. 1-6.
Stojanovic, V. and Oklobdzija, V., “Comparative Analysis of Master-Slave Latches and Flip-Flops for High-Performance and Low-Power Systems”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 4, Apr. 1999, pp. 536-548.
Taub, et al., Digital Integrated Electronics, Jan. 1977, McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp. 98-100.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160036424 A1 Feb 2016 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 14083348 Nov 2013 US
Child 14882264 US
Parent 13356396 Jan 2012 US
Child 14083348 US
Parent 12397085 Mar 2009 US
Child 13356396 US
Parent 11021632 Dec 2004 US
Child 12397085 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10864271 Jun 2004 US
Child 11021632 US