Embodiments relate to power efficient multiplexers.
Static power consumption in modern semiconductor processes, e.g., processes with a minimum feature size of about 0.13 microns and smaller, is no longer a negligible component of total power consumption. For such processes, static power may be one-half of total power consumption. Further, static power, as a percentage of total power, is tending to increase with successive generations of semiconductor process. Consequently, circuit elements that are efficient in terms of static power consumption are highly desired. One commonly utilized circuit element is a multiplexer. In general, a multiplexer selects among several inputs to propagate to its output. For example, variable delay circuits generally require a series of multiplexers to select between a signal present at a desired tap of the delay circuit and a signal propagating from beyond a desired tap.
A power efficient multiplexer is disclosed. In accordance with a first embodiment, a power efficient multiplexer comprises a transmission gate structure for selectively passing one of a plurality of input signals and a stacked inverter circuit for inverting the one of a plurality of input signals.
In accordance with another embodiment, the plurality of electronic signals is accessed. A method of selecting one electronic signal from a plurality of electronic signals is disclosed. A plurality of transmission gates is configured to select one electronic signal from the plurality of electronic signals. The one electronic signal is inverted utilizing a stacked inverter circuit
In accordance with still another embodiment, an electronic circuit comprises a stacked inverter circuit. The stacked inverter circuit comprises at least two devices of a first type coupled in series. These devices are coupled in series to a group of at least two devices of an opposite type coupled in series. The electronic circuit further comprises a first conductance terminal of a first transmission gate coupled to a first electronic signal and a first conductance terminal of a second transmission gate coupled to a second electronic signal. The second conductance terminals of the first and second transmission gates are coupled to an input of the stacked inverter circuit. The first control terminal of a semiconductor type of the first transmission gate is coupled to a second control terminal of opposite semiconductor type of the second transmission gate. The second control terminal of the opposite semiconductor type of the first transmission gate is coupled to a first control terminal of the semiconductor type of the second transmission gate.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the disclosure will be described in conjunction with these embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the disclosure to these embodiments. On the contrary, the disclosure is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that embodiments may be practiced without these specific details.
Power Efficient Multiplexer
Embodiments are described in the context of design and operation of integrated semiconductors. More particularly, embodiments relate to power efficient multiplexers. It is appreciated, however, that embodiments may be utilized in other areas of semiconductor design and operation.
The following description of embodiments is directed toward pFETs (or p-type metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETS)) formed in surface N-wells and/or nFETs (or n-type MOSFETS) formed in surface P-wells when a p-type substrate and an N-well process are utilized. It is to be appreciated, however, that embodiments are equally applicable to nFETs (or n-type MOSFETS) formed in surface P-wells and/or pFETs (or p-type MOSFETS) formed in surface N-wells when an n-type substrate and a P-well process are utilized. Consequently, embodiments are well suited to semiconductors formed in both p-type and n-type materials, and such embodiments are considered within the scope of the disclosure.
A bit value in latch 130 determines whether transmission gate 121 is “open” or “closed,” for example whether transmission gate 121 passes a signal or not. Similarly, the bit value in latch 130 determines whether transmission gate 122 passes a signal or not. Both transmission gates 121 and 122 are controlled by the same bit value and that bit value's complement. Consequently, either transmission gate 122 will pass a signal, or transmission gate 121 will pass a signal, but not both simultaneously.
For example, in the embodiment of
Similarly, a one value in latch 130 will cause transmission gate 122 to pass signal B 126, while causing transmission gate 121 not to pass any signals. Consequently, transmission gate structure 120 will select signal B 126 corresponding to a one value in latch 130.
The signal, A 125 or B 126, selected by transmission gate structure 120 is inverted by inverter 110 to produce output 140 of power efficient multiplexer 100.
It is to be appreciated that static power consumption in modern semiconductor processes, e.g., processes with a minimum feature size of about 0.13 microns and smaller, is no longer a negligible component of total power consumption. For such processes, static power may be one-half of total power consumption. Further, static power, as a percentage of total power, is tending to increase with successive generations of semiconductor process.
Advantageously, inverter 110 comprises stacked field effect transistors (FETs). In general, an inverter stage, whether conventional or stacked, forms a leakage path, e.g., a series “string” of devices coupled from operating voltage (Vdd) to ground. As current leaks through such leakage paths, static power is consumed by the inverter stage. As described more completely in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/864,271, entitled “Stacked Inverter Delay Chain” to Masleid and Burr, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, an inverter comprising stacked field effect transistors can consume less static power than a conventional inverter to produce a comparable delay.
Further, such leakage paths within a stacked inverter suffer less leakage than a conventional inverter, yielding additional beneficial leakage reductions. In a conventional inverter, exactly one transistor is on while the other transistor is off. As an unfortunate consequence, approximately the full bias voltage is applied to the off transistor, resulting in a maximum possible leakage for the off transistor.
In contrast, in a stacked inverter multiple transistors are either on or off in series. For example, in the embodiment of
It is to be further appreciated that such leakage induces non zero voltages at intermediate nodes between the off transistors. Such voltages induce body effects in the transistors. Such body effects increase the threshold voltage of the affected transistors. An increased threshold voltage generally produces beneficial decreases in leakage current.
Consequently, in addition to a decrease in a number of leakage paths, in accordance with embodiments, the leakage current of each path is very beneficially reduced due to an induced body effect and a highly non-linear relationship between bias voltage and leakage current. Thus, inverter 110 significantly reduces static power consumption, in comparison to a conventional inverter.
It is to be appreciated that more or fewer stacked FETs can be can be included in inverter 110 in order to achieve differing signal propagation and/or power characteristics, in accordance with embodiments.
For example, physical differences between electrons and holes, and between n-type and p-type dopants, as well as constructive differences in device geometry and dopant placement, result in differences in efficiency between n-type devices and p-type devices. Because electron mobility is higher than hole mobility, n-type devices are more efficient than p-type devices. However, the degree of difference depends on constructive differences that can vary with process. Such physical and constructive differences also produce other behavior differences, such as a difference in sensitivity to body effects. Consequently, different levels of benefit, e.g., in leakage reduction, are to be expected between stacks of n-type devices and stacks of p-type devices. To allow for such effects, in accordance with embodiments, it is possible to stack different numbers of transistors on either or both legs of a stacked inverter (e.g.,
Also of benefit in reducing power consumption, particularly static power consumption, of power efficient multiplexer 100 is transmission gate structure 120. It is to be appreciated that transmission gates, for example transmission gates 121 and 122, are characterized as having no direct path between power (Vdd) and ground. Consequently, transmission gates are characterized as having extremely small leakage, and thus very little static power consumption.
It is appreciated that a variety of factors, e.g., operating voltage, operating temperature and/or manufacturing process variations, can affect the speed of operation of an integrated circuit. It is generally desirable for a multiplexer to track speed changes of other circuitry of an integrated circuit. For example, if other circuits of an integrated circuit operate faster, generally a multiplexer is required to select a desired signal more quickly in order for the overall circuit to function. Because embodiments comprise stacked devices, they are similar to many logic circuits that also comprise stacked devices, e.g., NAND and/or NOR logic gates. Consequently, embodiments match or track changes in operating speed of complex logic more accurately than multiplexers comprising very simple inverters.
It is to be appreciated that embodiments are well suited to selecting among more than the two signals illustrated in
Embodiments are thus shown to offer significant and highly beneficial improvements in tracking timing changes of other circuits and in static power (leakage current) consumption in comparison to the conventional art.
In 220, a plurality of transmission gates is configured to select one electronic signal from the plurality of electronic signals. For example, referring to
In 230, the one electronic signal is inverted utilizing a stacked inverter circuit, for example stacked inverter circuit 110 of
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the disclosure and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the disclosure and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the disclosure be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application is a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/083,348, filed on Nov. 18, 2013, which a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/356,396, filed on Jan. 23, 2012, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,587,344, which is a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/397,085, filed on Mar. 3, 2009, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,102,190, which is a Continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,632, filed on Dec. 23, 2004, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,498,846, which is a Continuation-In-Part of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/864,271, filed on Jun. 8, 2004, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,336,103, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. This Application is related to the following commonly assigned United States Patent Applications, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,222, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,635,992, entitled “A Configurable Tapered Delay Chain with Multiple Sizes of Delay Elements” by Masleid; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,221, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,656,212, entitled “A Configurable Delay Chain with Switching Control for Tail Delay Elements” by Masleid; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,197, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,332,931, entitled “Leakage Efficient Anti-glitch Filter with Variable Delay Stages” by Masleid; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/020,746, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,310,008, entitled “A Configurable Delay Chain with Stacked Inverter Delay Elements” by Masleid; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/021,633, filed Dec. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,330,054, entitled “Leakage Efficient Anti-glitch Filter” by Masleid.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3900747 | Yamazaki et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3991380 | Pryor | Nov 1976 | A |
4087044 | Hofmann | May 1978 | A |
4216390 | Stewart | Aug 1980 | A |
4437024 | Wacyk | Mar 1984 | A |
4498021 | Uya | Feb 1985 | A |
4508983 | Allgood et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4568842 | Koike | Feb 1986 | A |
4578600 | Magee | Mar 1986 | A |
4651030 | Mimoto | Mar 1987 | A |
4700089 | Fujii et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4739252 | Malaviya et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4760279 | Saito et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4806804 | O'Leary | Feb 1989 | A |
4808802 | Kano | Feb 1989 | A |
4853560 | Iwamura et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4947064 | Kim et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5039893 | Tomisawa | Aug 1991 | A |
5128560 | Chern et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5166555 | Kano | Nov 1992 | A |
5227679 | Woo | Jul 1993 | A |
5264738 | Veendrick et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5294845 | McMahan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297086 | Nasu et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300835 | Assar et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5394034 | Becker et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5399925 | Nguyen | Mar 1995 | A |
5410278 | Itoh et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414312 | Wong | May 1995 | A |
5455521 | Dobbelaere | Oct 1995 | A |
5467038 | Motley et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5497105 | Oh et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5521530 | Yao et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525616 | Platt et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5568103 | Nakashima et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5587665 | Jiang | Dec 1996 | A |
5594360 | Wojciechowski | Jan 1997 | A |
5606275 | Farhang et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610548 | Masleid | Mar 1997 | A |
5614845 | Masleid | Mar 1997 | A |
5656963 | Masleid et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5677650 | Kwasniewski et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680359 | Jeong | Oct 1997 | A |
5698994 | Tsuji | Dec 1997 | A |
5739715 | Rawson | Apr 1998 | A |
5764110 | Ishibashi | Jun 1998 | A |
5767700 | Lee | Jun 1998 | A |
5777488 | Dryer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5777501 | AbouSeido | Jul 1998 | A |
5778214 | Taya et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791715 | Nebel | Aug 1998 | A |
5793222 | Nakase | Aug 1998 | A |
5793715 | Alon et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796313 | Eitan | Aug 1998 | A |
5797105 | Nakaya et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801548 | Lee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811983 | Lundberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5877632 | Goetting et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880608 | Mehta et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894419 | Galambos et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5926050 | Proebsting | Jul 1999 | A |
5963043 | Nassif | Oct 1999 | A |
5963074 | Arkin | Oct 1999 | A |
5969543 | Erickson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977763 | Loughmiller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982211 | Ko | Nov 1999 | A |
6011403 | Gillette | Jan 2000 | A |
6025738 | Masleid | Feb 2000 | A |
6028490 | Komatsu | Feb 2000 | A |
6031403 | Gersbach | Feb 2000 | A |
6069506 | Miller, Jr. et al. | May 2000 | A |
6087886 | Ko | Jul 2000 | A |
6111447 | Ternullo, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114840 | Farrell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127872 | Kumata | Oct 2000 | A |
6154099 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154100 | Okamoto | Nov 2000 | A |
6160755 | Norman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172545 | Ishii | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172943 | Yuzuki | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188260 | Stotz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198334 | Tomobe et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204710 | Goetting et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229747 | Cho et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242936 | Ho et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242937 | Lee et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262601 | Choe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275091 | Saeki | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281706 | Wert et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285230 | Na | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294930 | Goetting et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6321282 | Horowitz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323706 | Stark et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6366115 | DiTommaso | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407571 | Furuya et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426641 | Koch et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426652 | Greenhill et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455901 | Kameyama et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6459319 | Sako | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6466063 | Chen | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476632 | La Rosa et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489796 | Tomishima | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6535014 | Chetlur et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538471 | Stan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538522 | Aipperspach et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545519 | Carballo | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570407 | Sugisawa et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573774 | Gardner | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6573777 | Saint-Laurent et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577157 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577176 | Masleid et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6621298 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621318 | Burr | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6657504 | Deal et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664837 | Oh et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690242 | Fang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697929 | Cherkauer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6724214 | Manna et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731140 | Masleid et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731179 | Abadeer et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6759863 | Moore | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6762638 | Correale, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6762966 | LaRosa et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768363 | Yoo et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774734 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798230 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6815971 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815977 | Sabbavarapu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831494 | Fu et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6879200 | Komura et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882172 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885210 | Suzuki | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6903564 | Suzuki | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6924669 | Itoh et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6956399 | Bauer | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7053660 | Itoh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053680 | Masleid et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7119580 | Masleid et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142018 | Masleid et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7172638 | Robb | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7173455 | Masleid et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7239170 | Suen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245159 | Dhong et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7271638 | Takai et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7282958 | Rhee | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295041 | Masleid et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7304503 | Masleid et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7336103 | Masleid et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7525341 | Rosen et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7808271 | Rosen et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20010000426 | Sung et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010028278 | Ooishi | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030561 | Asano et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010052623 | Kameyama et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020056016 | Horowitz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020178415 | Saraf | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005775 | Washeleski et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011413 | Masleid | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030042960 | Gomm | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057775 | Yamashita et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030160630 | Earle | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030189465 | Abadeer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030231713 | Masleid et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040104731 | Vollertsen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119501 | Sabbavarapu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119503 | Jamshidi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124900 | Brox | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148111 | Gauthier et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040257115 | Bertram et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050184720 | Bernstein et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050212547 | Suzuki | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248368 | Bertram et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1398639 | Mar 2004 | EP |
03089624 | Apr 1991 | JP |
04091516 | Mar 1992 | JP |
06216723 | Aug 1994 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Chen, G et al., “Dynamic NBTI of p-MOS Transistors and its Impact on MOSFET Scaling” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-3. |
Lima T., et al.; “Capacitance Coupling Immune, Transient Sensitive Accelerator for Resistive Interconnect Signals of Subquater Micron ULSI”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Inc., New York, US, vol. 31, No. 4, Apr. 1996, pp. 531-536. |
Nalamalpu, et al., “Boosters for Driving Long OnChip Interconnects—Design Issues, Interconnect Synthesis, and Comparision With Repeaters”, Jan. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 21, No. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 50-62. |
Oner et al., “A compact Monitoring Circuit for Real-Time On-Chip Diagnosis of Hot-Carrier Induced Degradation” Microelectronic test structures. Proceedings, IEEE International Conference in Monterey, CA. Mar. 17, 1997-Mar. 20, 1997, pp. 72-76. |
Peters, Laura. “NBTI: A Growing Threat to Device Reliability,” Semiconductor International. Mar. 1, 2004 Http://www.reed-electronics.com/semiconductor/article/CA386329?industryid=3033. |
Reddy. V. et al., “Impact of Negative Bias Temperature Instability on Digital Circuit Reliability”. 2002 IEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings, Dallas, TX Apr. 7, 2002-Apr. 11, 2002, pp. 248-254. |
Rhyne, “Fundamentals of Digital Systems Design”, N.J., Jan. 1973, pp. 70-71. |
Ryohei Kaneda, Translation of Japanese Kokai Patent Application No. HEI 3[1991]-89624, publication date: Apr. 15, 1991, pp. 1-6. |
Stojanovic, V. and Oklobdzija, V., “Comparative Analysis of Master-Slave Latches and Flip-Flops for High-Performance and Low-Power Systems”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 4, Apr. 1999, pp. 536-548. |
Taub, et al., Digital Integrated Electronics, Jan. 1977, McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp. 98-100. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160036424 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14083348 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 14882264 | US | |
Parent | 13356396 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 14083348 | US | |
Parent | 12397085 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 13356396 | US | |
Parent | 11021632 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 12397085 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10864271 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11021632 | US |