Patent Grant
9897665
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a system and method for managing a power grid, and more particularly to a system and method for managing outage and fault conditions in a power grid.
2. Related Art
A power grid may include one or all of the following: electricity generation, electric power transmission, and electricity distribution. Electricity may be generated using generating stations, such as a coal fire power plant, a nuclear power plant, etc. For efficiency purposes, the generated electrical power is stepped up to a very high voltage (such as 345K Volts) and transmitted over transmission lines. The transmission lines may transmit the power long distances, such as across state lines or across international boundaries, until it reaches its wholesale customer, which may be a company that owns the local distribution network. The transmission lines may terminate at a transmission substation, which may step down the very high voltage to an intermediate voltage (such as 138K Volts). From a transmission substation, smaller transmission lines (such as sub-transmission lines) transmit the intermediate voltage to distribution substations. At the distribution substations, the intermediate voltage may be again stepped down to a “medium voltage” (such as from 4K Volts to 23K Volts). One or more feeder circuits may emanate from the distribution substations. For example, four to tens of feeder circuits may emanate from the distribution substation. The feeder circuit is a 3-phase circuit comprising 4 wires (three wires for each of the 3 phases and one wire for neutral). Feeder circuits may be routed either above ground (on poles) or underground. The voltage on the feeder circuits may be tapped off periodically using distribution transformers, which step down the voltage from “medium voltage” to the consumer voltage (such as 120V). The consumer voltage may then be used by the consumer.
One or more power companies may manage the power grid, including managing faults, maintenance, and upgrades related to the power grid. However, the management of the power grid is often inefficient and costly. For example, a power company that manages the local distribution network may manage faults that may occur in the feeder circuits or on circuits, called lateral circuits, which branch from the feeder circuits. The management of the local distribution network often relies on telephone calls from consumers when an outage occurs or relies on field workers analyzing the local distribution network.
Power companies have attempted to upgrade the power grid using digital technology, sometimes called a “smart grid.” For example, more intelligent meters (sometimes called “smart meters”) are a type of advanced meter that identifies consumption in more detail than a conventional meter. The smart meter may then communicate that information via some network back to the local utility for monitoring and billing purposes (telemetering). While these recent advances in upgrading the power grid are beneficial, more advances are necessary. It has been reported that in the United States alone, half of generation capacity is unused, half the long distance transmission network capacity is unused, and two thirds of its local distribution is unused. Therefore, a need clearly exists to improve the management of the power grid.
According to one aspect of the disclosure, an outage management system for a power grid is disclosed. The outage management system may include an outage intelligence application executable on one or more processors configured to receive event messages from various devices and portions of the power grid. The event messages may allow the outage intelligence application to determine when outage conditions may be present for a particular device or portion of the power grid. The outage intelligence application may determine a state of operation for one, some, or all of the devices and portion of the power grid that transmit the event messages. The outage intelligence application may receive data related to current demand conditions of the power grid and physical configuration of the power grid to confirm that an outage associated with the power grid is present upon receipt of an event message indicating such. The outage intelligence application may notify a central power authority of an outage occurrence enabling location and correction of the outage. The outage intelligence application may suspend processing messages received from a portions of the power grid experiencing outage conditions based on receipt of the event messages and may resume such processing when the outage conditions are no longer present.
According to another aspect of the disclosure, a fault intelligence application executable on at least one processor may be configured to receive phasor data (magnitude and phase angle) to identify fault types upon detection of fault conditions of a fault in a power grid. The fault intelligence application may apply a set of predetermined criteria to the phasor data. The fault intelligence application may apply various categories of criteria to the phasor data to systematically eliminate any fault types from consideration based on the application of the criteria. As each category of criteria is applied, the fault types not meeting the criteria may be eliminated from consideration as the fault type. Application of each category may result in a reduction of the potential fault types, and may ultimately result in a single fault type identified as the fault type. The fault intelligence application may implement consecutive reading constraint to determine that the fault is more than transitory in nature. A central authority may be provided the fault identification for subsequent analysis and correction.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages will be, or will become, apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the following claims.
By way of overview, the preferred embodiments described below relate to a method and system for managing a power grid. As discussed in more detail below, certain aspects relate to the power grid itself (include hardware and software in the electric power transmission and/or the electricity distribution). Further, certain aspects relate to the functional capabilities of the central management of the power grid. These functional capabilities may be grouped into two categories, operation and application. The operations services enable the utilities to monitor and manage the smart grid infrastructure (such as applications, network, servers, sensors, etc).
As discussed in more detail below, the application capabilities may relate to the measurement and control of the grid itself. Specifically, the application services enable the functionality that may be important to a smart grid, and may include: (1) data collection processes; (2) data categorization and persistence processes; and (3) observability processes. As discussed in more detail below, using these processes allows one to “observe” the grid, analyze the data and derive information about the grid.
INDE High Level Architecture Description
Overall Architecture
Turning to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements,
The architecture depicted in
As another example, two or more of the data buses may be on separate buses, such as separate physical buses in terms of the hardware needed to transport data on the separate buses. Specifically, each of the buses may include cabling separate from each other. Further, some or all of the separate buses may be of the same type. For example, one or more of the buses may comprise a local area network (LAN), such as Ethernet® over unshielded twisted pair cabling and Wi-Fi. As discussed in more detail below, hardware and/or software, such as a router, may be used to route data on data onto one bus among the different physical buses.
As still another example, two or more of the buses may be on different segments in a single bus structure and one or more buses may be on separate physical buses. Specifically, the high speed sensor data bus 146 and the event processing bus 147 may be different segments in a single data bus, while the enterprise integration environment bus 114 may be on a physically separate bus.
Though
The IT environment may be SOA-compatible. Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is a computer systems architectural style for creating and using business processes, packaged as services, throughout their lifecycle. SOA also defines and provisions the IT infrastructure to allow different applications to exchange data and participate in business processes. Although, the use of SOA and the enterprise service bus are optional.
The figures illustrate different elements within the overall architecture, such as the following: (1) INDE CORE 120; (2) INDE SUBSTATION 180; and (3) INDE DEVICE 188. This division of the elements within the overall architecture is for illustration purposes. Other division of the elements may be used. The INDE architecture may be used to support both distributed and centralized approaches to grid intelligence, and to provide mechanisms for dealing with scale in large implementations.
The INDE Reference Architecture is one example of the technical architecture that may be implemented. For example, it may be an example of a meta-architecture, used to provide a starting point for developing any number of specific technical architectures, one for each utility solution, as discussed below. Thus, the specific solution for a particular utility may include one, some, or all of the elements in the INDE Reference Architecture. And, the INDE Reference Architecture may provide a standardized starting point for solution development. Discussed below is the methodology for determining the specific technical architecture for a particular power grid.
The INDE Reference Architecture may be an enterprise wide architecture. Its purpose may be to provide the framework for end to end management of grid data and analytics and integration of these into utility systems and processes. Since smart grid technology affects every aspect of utility business processes, one should be mindful of the effects not just at the grid, operations, and customer premise levels, but also at the back office and enterprise levels. Consequently the INDE Reference Architecture can and does reference enterprise level SOA, for example, in order to support the SOA environment for interface purposes. This should not be taken as a requirement that a utility must convert their existing IT environment to SOA before a smart grid can be built and used. An enterprise service bus is a useful mechanism for facilitating IT integration, but it is not required in order to implement the rest of the smart grid solution. The discussion below focuses on different components of the INDE smart grid elements.
INDE Component Groups
As discussed above, the different components in the INDE Reference Architecture may include, for example: (1) INDE CORE 120; (2) INDE SUBSTATION 180; and (3) INDE DEVICE 188. The following sections discuss these three example element groups of the INDE Reference Architecture and provide descriptions of the components of each group.
INDE Core
In addition, this data architecture may make use of federation middleware 134 to connect other types of utility data (such as, for example, meter data, operational and historical data, log and event files), and connectivity and meta-data files into a single data architecture that may have a single entry point for access by high level applications, including enterprise applications. Real time systems may also access key data stores via the high speed data bus and several data stores can receive real time data. Different types of data may be transported within one or more buses in the smart grid. As discussed below in the INDE SUBSTATION 180 section, substation data may be collected and stored locally at the substation. Specifically, a database, which may be associated with and proximate to the substation, may store the substation data. Analytics pertaining to the substation level may also be performed at the substation computers and stored at the substation database, and all or part of the data may be transported to the control center.
The types of data transported may include operation and non-operational data, events, grid connectivity data, and network location data. Operational data may include, but is not limited to, switch state, feeder state, capacitor state, section state, meter state, FCI state, line sensor state, voltage, current, real power, reactive power, etc. Non-operational data may include, but is not limited to, power quality, power reliability, asset health, stress data, etc. The operational and non-operational data may be transported using an operational/non-operational data bus 146. Data collection applications in the electric power transmission and/or electricity distribution of the power grid may be responsible for sending some or all of the data to the operational/non-operational data bus 146. In this way, applications that need this information may be able to get the data by subscribing to the information or by invoking services that may make this data available.
Events may include messages and/or alarms originating from the various devices and sensors that are part of the smart grid, as discussed below. Events may be directly generated from the devices and sensors on the smart grid network as well as generated by the various analytics applications based on the measurement data from these sensors and devices. Examples of events may include meter outage, meter alarm, transformer outage, etc. Grid components like grid devices (smart power sensors (such as a sensor with an embedded processor that can be programmed for digital processing capability) temperature sensors, etc.), power system components that includes additional embedded processing (RTUs, etc), smart meter networks (meter health, meter readings, etc), and mobile field force devices (outage events, work order completions, etc) may generate event data, operational and non-operational data. The event data generated within the smart grid may be transmitted via an event bus 147.
Grid connectivity data may define the layout of the utility grid. There may be a base layout which defines the physical layout of the grid components (sub stations, segments, feeders, transformers, switches, reclosers, meters, sensors, utility poles, etc) and their inter-connectivity at installation. Based on the events within the grid (component failures, maintenance activity, etc), the grid connectivity may change on a continual basis. As discussed in more detail below, the structure of how the data is stored as well as the combination of the data enable the historical recreation of the grid layout at various past times. Grid connectivity data may be extracted from the Geographic Information System (GIS) on a periodic basis as modifications to the utility grid are made and this information is updated in the GIS application.
Network location data may include the information about the grid component on the communication network. This information may be used to send messages and information to the particular grid component. Network location data may be either entered manually into the Smart Grid database as new Smart Grid components are installed or is extracted from an Asset Management System if this information is maintained externally.
As discussed in more detail below, data may be sent from various components in the grid (such as INDE SUBSTATION 180 and/or INDE DEVICE 188). The data may be sent to the INDE CORE 120 wirelessly, wired, or a combination of both. The data may be received by utility communications networks 160, which may send the data to routing device 190. Routing device 190 may comprise software and/or hardware for managing routing of data onto a segment of a bus (when the bus comprises a segmented bus structure) or onto a separate bus. Routing device may comprise one or more switches or a router. Routing device 190 may comprise a networking device whose software and hardware routes and/or forwards the data to one or more of the buses. For example, the routing device 190 may route operational and non-operational data to the operational/non-operational data bus 146. The router may also route event data to the event bus 147.
The routing device 190 may determine how to route the data based on one or more methods. For example, the routing device 190 may examine one or more headers in the transmitted data to determine whether to route the data to the segment for the operational/non-operational data bus 146 or to the segment for the event bus 147. Specifically, one or more headers in the data may indicate whether the data is operation/non-operational data (so that the routing device 190 routes the data to the operational/non-operational data bus 146) or whether the data is event data (so that the routing device 190 routes the event bus 147). Alternatively, the routing device 190 may examine the payload of the data to determine the type of data (e.g., the routing device 190 may examine the format of the data to determine if the data is operational/non-operational data or event data).
One of the stores, such as the operational data warehouse 137 that stores the operational data, may be implemented as true distributed database. Another of the stores, the historian (identified as historical data 136 in
The storage of the data may be such that the data may be as close to the source as possible or practicable. In one implementation, this may include, for example, the substation data being stored at the INDE SUBSTATION 180. But this data may also be required at the operations control center level 116 to make different types of decisions that consider the grid at a much granular level. In conjunction with a distributed intelligence approach, a distributed data approach may be been adopted to facilitate data availability at all levels of the solution through the use of database links and data services as applicable. In this way, the solution for the historical data store (which may be accessible at the operations control center level 116) may be similar to that of the operational data store. Data may be stored locally at the substation and database links configured on the repository instance at the control center, provide access to the data at the individual substations. Substation analytics may be performed locally at the substation using the local data store. Historical/collective analytics may be performed at the operations control center level 116 by accessing data at the local substation instances using the database links. Alternatively, data may be stored centrally at the INDE CORE 120. However, given the amount of data that may need to be transmitted from the INDE DEVICES 188, the storage of the data at the INDE DEVICES 188 may be preferred. Specifically, if there are thousands or tens of thousands of substations (which may occur in a power grid), the amount of data that needs to be transmitted to the INDE CORE 120 may create a communications bottleneck.
Finally, the INDE CORE 120 may program or control one, some or all of the INDE SUBSTATION 180 or INDE DEVICE 188 in the power grid (discussed below). For example, the INDE CORE 120 may modify the programming (such as download an updated program) or provide a control command to control any aspect of the INDE SUBSTATION 180 or INDE DEVICE 188 (such as control of the sensors or analytics). Other elements, not shown in
Table 1 describes the certain elements of INDE CORE 120 as depicted in
As discussed in Table 1, the real time data bus 146 (which communicates the operation and non-operational data) and the real time complex event processing bus 147 (which communicates the event processing data) into a single bus 346. An example of this is illustrated in the block diagram 300 in
As shown in
One or more of the systems in the Operations Control Center 116 that are outside of the INDE Core 120 are legacy product systems that a utility may have. Examples of these legacy product systems include the Operations SOA Support 148, Geographic Information System 149, Work Management System 150, Call Management 151, Circuit & Load Flow Analysis, Planning, Lightning Analysis and Grid Simulation Tools 152, Meter Data Collection Head End(s) 153, Demand Response Management System 154, Outage Management System 155, Energy Management System 156, Distribution Management System 157, IP Network Services 158, and Dispatch Mobile Data System 159. However, these legacy product systems may not be able to process or handle data that is received from a smart grid. The INDE Core 120 may be able to receive the data from the smart grid, process the data from the smart grid, and transfer the processed data to the one or more legacy product systems in a fashion that the legacy product systems may use (such as particular formatting particular to the legacy product system). In this way, the INDE Core 120 may be viewed as a middleware.
The operations control center 116, including the INDE CORE 120, may communicate with the Enterprise IT 115. Generally speaking, the functionality in the Enterprise IT 115 comprises back-office operations. Specifically, the Enterprise IT 115 may use the enterprise integration environment bus 114 to send data to various systems within the Enterprise IT 115, including Business Data Warehouse 104, Business Intelligence Applications 105, Enterprise Resource Planning 106, various Financial Systems 107, Customer Information System 108, Human Resource System 109, Asset Management System 110, Enterprise SOA Support 111, Network Management System 112, and Enterprise Messaging Services 113. The Enterprise IT 115 may further include a portal 103 to communicate with the Internet 101 via a firewall 102.
INDE Substation
Table 2 below lists and describes certain INDE SUBSTATION 180 group elements. Data security services 171 may be a part of the substation environment; alternatively, they may be integrated into the INDE SUBSTATION 180 group.
As discussed above, different elements within the smart grid may include additional functionality including additional processing/analytical capability and database resources. The use of this additional functionality within various elements in the smart grid enables distributed architectures with centralized management and administration of applications and network performance. For functional, performance, and scalability reasons, a smart grid involving thousands to tens of thousands of INDE SUBSTATIONS 180 and tens of thousands to millions of grid devices may include distributed processing, data management, and process communications.
The INDE SUBSTATION 180 may include one or more processors and one or more memory devices (such as substation non-operational data 181 and substation operations data 182). Non-operational data 181 and substation operations data 182 may be associated with and proximate to the substation, such as located in or on the INDE SUBSTATION 180. The INDE SUBSTATION 180 may further include components of the smart grid that are responsible for the observability of the smart grid at a substation level. The INDE SUBSTATION 180 components may provide three primary functions: operational data acquisition and storage in the distributed operational data store; acquisition of non-operational data and storage in the historian; and local analytics processing on a real time (such as a sub-second) basis. Processing may include digital signal processing of voltage and current waveforms, detection and classification processing, including event stream processing; and communications of processing results to local systems and devices as well as to systems at the operations control center 116. Communication between the INDE SUBSTATION 180 and other devices in the grid may be wired, wireless, or a combination of wired and wireless. For example, the transmission of data from the INDE SUBSTATION 180 to the operations control center 116 may be wired. The INDE SUBSTATION 180 may transmit data, such as operation/non-operational data or event data, to the operations control center 116. Routing device 190 may route the transmitted data to one of the operational/non-operational data bus 146 or the event bus 147.
Demand response optimization for distribution loss management may also be performed here. This architecture is in accordance with the distributed application architecture principle previously discussed.
For example, connectivity data may be duplicated at the substation 170 and at the operations control center 116, thereby allowing a substation 170 to operate independently even if the data communication network to the operations control center 116 is not functional. With this information (connectivity) stored locally, substation analytics may be performed locally even if the communication link to the operations control center is inoperative.
Similarly, operational data may be duplicated at the operations control center 116 and at the substations 170. Data from the sensors and devices associated with a particular substation may be collected and the latest measurement may be stored in this data store at the substation. The data structures of the operational data store may be the same and hence database links may be used to provide seamless access to data that resides on the substations thru the instance of the operational data store at the control center. This provides a number of advantages including alleviating data replication and enabling substation data analytics, which is more time sensitive, to occur locally and without reliance on communication availability beyond the substation. Data analytics at the operations control center level 116 may be less time sensitive (as the operations control center 116 may typically examine historical data to discern patterns that are more predictive, rather than reactive) and may be able to work around network issues if any.
Finally, historical data may be stored locally at the substation and a copy of the data may be stored at the control center. Or, database links may be configured on the repository instance at the operations control center 116, providing the operations control center access to the data at the individual substations. Substation analytics may be performed locally at the substation 170 using the local data store. Specifically, using the additional intelligence and storage capability at the substation enables the substation to analyze itself and to correct itself without input from a central authority. Alternatively, historical/collective analytics may also be performed at the operations control center level 116 by accessing data at the local substation instances using the database links.
INDE Device
The INDE DEVICE 188 group may comprise any variety of devices within the smart grid, including various sensors within the smart grid, such as various distribution grid devices 189 (e.g., line sensors on the power lines), meters 163 at the customer premises, etc. The INDE DEVICE 188 group may comprise a device added to the grid with particular functionality (such as a smart Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) that includes dedicated programming), or may comprise an existing device within the grid with added functionality (such as an existing open architecture pole top RTU that is already in place in the grid that may be programmed to create a smart line sensor or smart grid device). The INDE DEVICE 188 may further include one or more processors and one or more memory devices.
Existing grid devices may not be open from the software standpoint, and may not be capable of supporting much in the way of modern networking or software services. The existing grid devices may have been designed to acquire and store data for occasional offload to some other device such as a laptop computer, or to transfer batch files via PSTN line to a remote host on demand. These devices may not be designed for operation in a real time digital network environment. In these cases, the grid device data may be obtained at the substation level 170, or at the operations control center level 116, depending on how the existing communications network has been designed. In the case of meters networks, it will normally be the case that data is obtained from the meter data collection engine, since meter networks are usually closed and the meters may not be addressed directly. As these networks evolve, meters and other grid devices may be individually addressable, so that data may be transported directly to where it is needed, which may not necessarily be the operations control center 116, but may be anywhere on the grid.
Devices such as faulted circuit indicators may be married with wireless network interface cards, for connection over modest speed (such as 100 kbps) wireless networks. These devices may report status by exception and carry out fixed pre-programmed functions. The intelligence of many grid devices may be increased by using local smart RTUs. Instead of having poletop RTUs that are designed as fixed function, closed architecture devices, RTUs may be used as open architecture devices that can be programmed by third parties and that may serve as an INDE DEVICE 188 in the INDE Reference Architecture. Also, meters at customers' premises may be used as sensors. For example, meters may measure consumption (such as how much energy is consumed for purposes of billing) and may measure voltage (for use in volt/VAr optimization).
The customer premises 165 may further include controls 167 that may control one or more devices at the customer premises 179. Various appliances at the customer premises 179 may be controlled, such as the heater, air conditioner, etc., depending on commands from the operations control center 116.
As depicted in
As discussed above, the devices in the power grid outside of the operations control center 116 may include processing and/or storage capability. The devices may include the INDE SUBSTATION 180 and the INDE DEVICE 188. In addition to the individual devices in the power grid including additional intelligence, the individual devices may communicate with other devices in the power grid, in order to exchange information (include sensor data and/or analytical data (such as event data)) in order to analyze the state of the power grid (such as determining faults) and in order to change the state of the power grid (such as correcting for the faults). Specifically, the individual devices may use the following: (1) intelligence (such as processing capability); (2) storage (such as the distributed storage discussed above); and (3) communication (such as the use of the one or more buses discussed above). In this way, the individual devices in the power grid may communicate and cooperate with one another without oversight from the operations control center 116.
For example, the INDE architecture disclosed above may include a device that senses at least one parameter on the feeder circuit. The device may further include a processor that monitors the sensed parameter on the feeder circuit and that analyzes the sensed parameter to determine the state of the feeder circuit. For example, the analysis of the sense parameter may comprise a comparison of the sensed parameter with a predetermined threshold and/or may comprise a trend analysis. One such sensed parameter may include sensing the waveforms and one such analysis may comprise determining whether the sensed waveforms indicate a fault on the feeder circuit. The device may further communicate with one or more substations. For example, a particular substation may supply power to a particular feeder circuit. The device may sense the state of the particular feeder circuit, and determine whether there is a fault on the particular feeder circuit. The device may communicate with the substation. The substation may analyze the fault determined by the device and may take corrective action depending on the fault (such as reducing the power supplied to the feeder circuit). In the example of the device sending data indicating a fault (based on analysis of waveforms), the substation may alter the power supplied to the feeder circuit without input from the operations control center 116. Or, the substation may combine the data indicating the fault with information from other sensors to further refine the analysis of the fault. The substation may further communicate with the operations control center 116, such as the outage intelligence application (such as discussed
As another example, a line sensor, which includes additional intelligence using processing and/or memory capability, may produce grid state data in a portion of the grid (such as a feeder circuit). The grid state data may be shared with the demand response management system 155 at the operations control center 116. The demand response management system 155 may control one or more devices at customer sites on the feeder circuit in response to the grid state data from the line sensor. In particular, the demand response management system 155 may command the energy management system 156 and/or the distribution management system 157 to reduce load on the feeder circuit by turning off appliances at the customer sites that receive power from the feeder circuit in response to line sensor indicating an outage on the feeder circuit. In this way, the line sensor in combination with the demand response management system 155 may shift automatically load from a faulty feeder circuit and then isolate the fault.
As still another example, one or more relays in the power grid may have a microprocessor associated with it. These relays may communicate with other devices and/or databases resident in the power grid in order to determine a fault and/or control the power grid.
INDS Concept and Architecture
Outsourced Smart Grid Data/Analytics Services Model
One application for the smart grid architecture allows the utility to subscribe to grid data management and analytics services while maintaining traditional control systems and related operational systems in-house. In this model, the utility may install and own grid sensors and devices (as described above), and may either own and operate the grid data transport communication system, or may outsource it. The grid data may flow from the utility to a remote Intelligent Network Data Services (INDS) hosting site, where the data may be managed, stored, and analyzed. The utility may then subscribe to data and analytics services under an appropriate services financial model. The utility may avoid the initial capital expenditure investment and the ongoing costs of management, support, and upgrade of the smart grid data/analytics infrastructure, in exchange for fees. The INDE Reference Architecture, described above, lends itself to the outsourcing arrangement described herein.
INDS Architecture for Smart Grid Services
In order to implement the INDS services model, the INDE Reference Architecture may be partitioned into a group of elements that may be hosted remotely, and those that may remain at the utility.
As the overall block diagram 600 in
The INDE CORE 120 may be remotely hosted, as the block diagram 700 in
In order to facilitate communications, high bandwidth low latency communications services, such as via network 704 (e.g., a MPLS or other WAN), may be use that can reach the subscriber utility operations centers, as well as the INDS hosting sites. As shown in
Specific Examples of Functionality in INDE CORE
As shown in
Observability Processes
As discussed above, one functionality of the application services may include observability processes. The observability processes may allow the utility to “observe” the grid. These processes may be responsible for interpreting the raw data received from all the sensors and devices on the grid and turning them into actionable information.
The meter state application may send a request for meter data to the Meter DCE, as shown in block 924, which in turn sends a request to one or more meters to collect meter data, as shown at block 920. In response to the request, the one or more meters collects meter data, as shown at block 916, and sends the voltage data to the Meter DCE, as shown at block 918. The Meter DCE may collect the voltage data, as shown at block 922, and send the data to the requestor of the data, as shown at block 928. The meter state application may receive the meter data, as shown at block 930, and determine whether it is for a single value process or a voltage profile grid state, as shown at block 932. If it is for the single value process, the meter data is send to the requesting process, as shown at block 936. If the meter data is for storage to determine the grid state at a future time, the meter data is stored in the operational data store, as shown at block 938. The operational data store further sends a snapshot of the data to the historian, as shown at block 940, and the historian stores the snapshot of the data, as shown at block 942.
Demand response may generally be used to refer to mechanisms used to encourage consumers to reduce demand, thereby reducing the peak demand for electricity. Since electrical systems are generally sized to correspond to peak demand (plus margin for error and unforeseen events), lowering peak demand may reduce overall plant and capital cost requirements. Depending on the configuration of generation capacity, however, demand response may also be used to increase demand (load) at times of high production and low demand. Some systems may thereby encourage energy storage to arbitrage between periods of low and high demand (or low and high prices). As the proportion of intermittent power sources such as wind power in a system grows, demand response may become increasingly important to effective management of the electric grid.
The DR state application may request the DR available capacity, as shown at block 954. The DR management system may then request available capacity from one or more DR home devices, as shown at block 948. The one or more home devices may collect available DR capacity in response to the request, as shown at block 944, and send the DR capacity and response data to the DR management system, as shown at block 946. The DR management system may collect the DR capacity and response data, as shown at block 950, and send the DR capacity and response data to the DR state application, as shown at block 952. The DR state application may receive the DR capacity and response data, as shown at block 956, and send the capacity and response data to the operational data store, as shown at block 958. The operational data store may store the DR capacity and response data, as shown at block 938. The operational data store may further send a snapshot of the data to the historian, as shown at block 940, and the historian may store the snapshot of the data, as shown at block 942.
The substation computer may request application data from the substation application, as shown at block 974. In response, the substation application may request application from the substation device, as shown at block 964. The substation device may collect the application data, as shown at block 960, and send the application data to the substation device (which may include one, some or all of Voltage, Current, Real Power, and Reactive Power data), as shown at block 962. The substation application may collect the application data, as shown at block 966, and send the application data to the requestor (which may be the substation computer), as shown at block 968. The substation computer may receive the application data, as shown at block 970, and send the application data to the operational data store, as shown at block 972.
The grid state measurement and operational data process may comprise deriving the grid state and grid topology at a given point in time, as well as providing this information to other system and data stores. The sub-processes may include: (1) measuring and capturing grid state information (this relates to the operational data pertaining to the grid that was discussed previously); (2) sending grid state information to other analytics applications (this enables other applications, such as analytical applications, access to the grid state data); (3) persisting grid state snapshot to connectivity/operational data store (this allows for updating the grid state information to the connectivity/operational data store in the appropriate format as well as forwarding this information to the historian for persistence so that a point in time grid topology may be derived at a later point in time); (4) deriving grid topology at a point in time based on default connectivity and current grid state (this provides the grid topology at a given point in time by applying the point in time snapshot of the grid state in the historian to the base connectivity in the connectivity data store, as discussed in more detail below); and (5) providing grid topology information to applications upon request.
With regard to sub-process (4), the grid topology may be derived for a predetermined time, such as in real-time, 30 seconds ago, 1 month ago, etc. In order to recreate the grid topology, multiple databases may be used, and a program to access the data in the multiple databases to recreate the grid topology. One database may comprise a relational database that stores the base connectivity data (the “connectivity database”). The connectivity database may hold the grid topology information as built in order to determine the baseline connectivity model. Asset and topology information may be updated into this database on a periodic basis, depending on upgrades to the power grid, such as the addition or modification of circuits in the power grid (e.g., additional feeder circuits that are added to the power grid). The connectivity database may be considered “static” in that it does not change. The connectivity database may change if there are changes to the structure of the power grid. For example, if there is a modification to the feeder circuits, such as an addition of a feeder circuit, the connectivity database may change.
One example of the structure 1800 of the connectivity database may be derived from the hierarchical model depicted in
A second database may be used to store the “dynamic” data. The second database may comprise a non-relational database. One example of a non-relational database may comprise a historian database, which stores the time series non-operational data as well as the historical operational data. The historian database may stores a series of “flat” records such as: (1) time stamp; (2) device ID; (3) a data value; and (4) a device status. Furthermore, the stored data may be compressed. Because of this, the operation/non-operational data in the power grid may be stored easily, and may be manageable even though a considerable amount of data may be available. For example, data on the order of 5 Terabytes may be online at any given time for use in order to recreate the grid topology. Because the data is stored in the simple flat record (such as no organizational approach), it allows efficiency in storing data. As discussed in more detail below, the data may be accessed by a specific tag, such as the time stamp.
Various analytics for the grid may wish to receive, as input, the grid topology at a particular point in time. For example, analytics relating to power quality, reliability, asset health, etc. may use the grid topology as input. In order to determine the grid topology, the baseline connectivity model, as defined by the data in the connectivity database, may be accessed. For example, if the topology of a particular feeder circuit is desired, the baseline connectivity model may define the various switches in the particular feeder circuit in the power grid. After which, the historian database may be accessed (based on the particular time) in order to determine the values of the switches in the particular feeder circuit. Then, a program may combine the data from the baseline connectivity model and the historian database in order to generate a representation of the particular feeder circuit at the particular time.
A more complicated example to determine the grid topology may include multiple feeder circuits (e.g., feeder circuit A and feeder circuit B) that have an inter-tie switch and sectionalizing switches. Depending on the switch states of certain switches (such as the inter-tie switch and/or the sectionalizing switches), sections of the feeder circuits may belong to feeder circuit A or feeder circuit B. The program that determines the grid topology may access the data from both the baseline connectivity model and the historian database in order to determine the connectivity at a particular time (e.g., which circuits belong to feeder circuit A or feeder circuit B).
The communication operation historian may send data to the event bus, as shown at block 1214. The communication operation historian may also send generation portfolio data, as shown at block 1212. Or, an asset management device, such as a Ventyx®, may request virtual power plant (VPP) information, as shown at block 1232. The operations data bus may collect the VPP data, as shown at block 1216, and send the data to the asset management device, as shown at block 1218. The asset management device may collect the VPP data, as shown at block 1234, run system optimization, as shown at block 1236, and send VPP signals to the event bus, as shown at block 1238. The event bus may receive the VPP signals, as shown at block 1256, and send the VPP signals to the distribution operation application, as shown at block 1258. The distribution operation application may then receive and process the event messages, as discussed above.
The connection extract application may extract new customer data, as shown at block 1278, to be sent to the Marketing Database, as shown at block 1290. The new customer data may be sent to the grid state/connectivity, as shown at block 1280, so that the grid state connectivity may receive new DR connectivity data, as shown at block 1210.
The operator may send one or more override signals when applicable, as shown at block 1242. The override signals may be sent to the distribution operation application. The override signal may be sent to the energy management system, as shown at block 1264, the billing database, as shown at block 1282, and/or the marketing database, as shown at block 1286.
The outage intelligence processes may: detect outages; classify & log momentaries; determine outage extent; determine outage root cause(s); track outage restoration; raise outage events; and update system performance indices.
The complex event processing may send a fault event message, as shown at block 1420. The event bus may receive the message (block 1442) and send the event message to the fault intelligence application (block 1444). The fault intelligence application may receive the event data (block 1432) and request grid state, connectivity data, and switch state, as shown at block 1456. In response to the request, the grid state and connectivity send grid state and connectivity data (block 1408), and the historian send switch state data (block 1412). The fault intelligence receives the data (block 1458), analyzes the data, and sends event data (block 1460). The event data may be received by the event bus (block 1446) and sent to the fault log file (block 1448). The fault log file may log the event data (block 1402). The event data may also be received by the operational data bus (block 1462) and send to one or more applications (block 1464). For example, the outage intelligence application may receive the event data (block 1466), discussed above with respect to
The fault intelligent processes may be responsible for interpreting the grid data to derive information about current and potential faults within the grid. Specifically, faults may be detected using the fault intelligent processes. A fault is typically a short circuit caused when utility equipment fails or alternate path for current flow is created, for example, a downed power line. This processes may be used to detect typical faults (typically handled by the conventional fault detection and protection equipment—relays, fuses, etc) as well as high impedance faults within the grid that are not easily detectable using fault currents.
The fault intelligence process may also classify and categorize faults. This allows for faults to be classified and categorized. Currently, no standard exists for a systematic organization and classification for faults. A de-facto standard may be established for the same and implemented. The fault intelligence process may further characterize faults.
The fault intelligence may also determine fault location. Fault location in the distribution system may be a difficult task due to its high complexity and difficulty caused by unique characteristics of the distribution system such as unbalanced loading, three-, two-, and single-phase laterals, lack of sensors/measurements, different types of faults, different causes of short circuits, varying loading conditions, long feeders with multiple laterals and network configurations that are not documented. This process enables the use a number of techniques to isolate the location of the fault with as much accuracy as the technology allows.
The fault intelligence may further raise fault events. Specifically, this process may create and publish fault events to the events bus once a fault has been detected, classified, categorized, characterized and isolated. This process may also be responsible for collecting, filtering, collating and de-duplicating faults so that an individual fault event is raised rather than a deluge based on the raw events that are typical during a failure. Finally, the fault intelligence may log fault events to the event log database.
The connectivity data mart may comprise a custom data store that contains the electrical connectivity information of the components of the grid. As shown in
The meta data extract application may request meta data for grid assets, as shown at block 1516. The meta data database may receive the request (block 1524) and send meta data (block 1526) The meta data extract application may receive the meta data (block 1518), extract, transform and load meta data (block 1520), and send the meta data to the CIM data warehouse (block 1522).
The CIM (Common Information Model) data warehouse may then store the data, as shown at block 1528. CIM may prescribe utility standard formats for representing utility data. The INDE smart grid may facilitate the availability of information from the smart grid in a utility standard format. And, the CIM data warehouse may facilitate the conversion of INDE specific data to one or more formats, such as a prescribed utility standard format.
The asset extract application may request information on new assets, as shown at block 1530. The asset registry may receive the request (block 1538) and send information on the new assets (block 1540). The asset extract application may receive the information on the new assets (block 1532), extract transform and load data (block 1534), and send information on the new assets to the CIM data warehouse (block 1536).
The DR connectivity extract application may request DR connectivity data, as shown at block 1542. The operational data bus may send the DR connectivity data request to the marketing database, as shown at block 1548. The marketing database may receive the request (block 1554), extract transform, load DR connectivity data (block 1556), and send the DR connectivity data (block 1558). The operational data bus may send the DR connectivity data to the DR connectivity extract application (block 1550). The DR connectivity extract application may receive the DR connectivity data (block 1544), and send the DR connectivity data (block 1546) via the operational data bus (block 1552) to the grid state and connectivity DM, which stores the DR connectivity data (block 1560).
The operational data bus may receive residential, commercial, and industrial meter data (block 1712) and send the data (block 1714). The data may be received by the meter data repository database (block 1716) or may be received by the billing processor (block 1718), which may in turn be sent to one or more systems, such as a CRM (customer relationship management) system (block 1720).
The observability processes may further include remote asset monitoring processes. Monitoring the assets within a power grid may prove difficult. There may be different portions of the power grid, some of which are very expensive. For example, substations may include power transformers (costing upwards of $1 million), and circuit breakers. Oftentimes, utilities would do little, if anything, in the way of analyzing the assets and maximizing the use of the assets. Instead, the focus of the utility was typically to ensure that the power to the consumer was maintained. Specifically, the utility was focused on scheduled inspections (which would typically occur at pre-determined intervals) or “event-driven” maintenance (which would occur if a fault occurred in a portion of the grid).
Instead of the typical scheduled inspections or “event-driven” maintenance, the remote asset monitoring processes may focus on condition-based maintenance. Specifically, if one portion (or all) of the power grid may be assessed (such as on a periodic or continual basis), the health of the power grid may be improved.
As discussed above, data may be generated at various portions of the power grid and transmitted to (or accessible by) a central authority. The data may then be used by the central authority in order to determine the health of the grid. Apart from analyzing the health of the grid, a central authority may perform utilization monitoring. Typically, equipment in the power grid is operated using considerable safety margins. One of the reasons for this is that utility companies are conservative by nature and seek to maintain power to the consumer within a wide margin of error. Another reason for this is that the utility companies monitoring the grid may not be aware of the extent a piece of equipment in the power grid is being utilized. For example, if a power company is transmitting power through a particular feeder circuit, the power company may not have a means by which to know if the transmitted power is near the limit of the feeder circuit (for example, the feeder circuit may become excessively heated). Because of this, the utility companies may be underutilizing one or more portions of the power grid.
Utilities also typically spend a considerable amount of money to add capacity to the power grid since the load on the power grid has been growing (i.e., the amount of power consumed has been increasing). Because of the Utilities' ignorance, Utilities will upgrade the power grid unnecessarily. For example, feeder circuits that are not operating near capacity may nonetheless be upgraded by reconductoring (i.e., bigger wires are laid in the feeder circuits), or additional feeder circuits may be laid. This cost alone is considerable.
The remote asset monitoring processes may monitor various aspects of the power grid, such as: (1) analyzing current asset health of one or more portions of the grid; (2) analyzing future asset health of one or more portions of the grid; and (3) analyzing utilization of one or more portions of the grid. First, one or more sensors may measure and transmit to remote asset monitoring processes in order to determine the current health of the particular portion of the grid. For example, a sensor on a power transform may provide an indicator of its health by measuring the dissolved gases on the transformer. The remote asset monitoring processes may then use analytic tools to determine if the particular portion of the grid (such as the power transform is healthy or not healthy). If the particular portion of the grid is not healthy, the particular portion of the grid may be fixed.
Moreover, the remote asset monitoring processes may analyze data generated from portions of the grid in order to predict the future asset health of the portions of the grid. There are things that cause stress on electrical components. The stress factors may not necessarily be constant and may be intermittent. The sensors may provide an indicator of the stress on a particular portion of the power grid. The remote asset monitoring processes may log the stress measurements, as indicated by the sensor data, and may analyze the stress measurement to predict the future health of the portion of the power grid. For example, the remote asset monitoring processes may use trend analysis in order to predict when the particular portion of the grid may fail, and may schedule maintenance in advance of (or concurrently with) the time when the particular portion of the grid may fail. In this way, the remote asset monitoring processes may predict the life of a particular portion of the grid, and thus determine if the life of that portion of the grid is too short (i.e., is that portion of the grid being used up too quickly).
Further, the remote asset monitoring processes may analyze the utilization of a portion of the power grid in order to manage the power grid better. For example, the remote asset monitoring processes may analyze a feeder circuit to determine what its operating capacity is. In this feeder circuit example, the remote asset monitoring processes may determine that the feeder circuit is currently being operated at 70%. The remote asset monitoring processes may further recommend that the particular feeder circuit may be operated at a higher percentage (such as 90%), while still maintaining acceptable safety margins. The remote asset monitoring processes may thus enable an effective increase in capacity simply through analyzing the utilization.
Methodology for Determining Specific Technical Architecture
There are various methodologies for determining the specific technical architecture that may use one, some, or all of the elements of the INDE Reference Architecture. The methodology may include a plurality of steps. First, a baseline step may be performed in generating documentation of the as-is state of the utility, and a readiness assessment for transition to a Smart Grid. Second, a requirements definition step may be performed in generating the definition of the to-be state and the detailed requirements to get to this state.
Third, a solution development step may be performed in generating the definition of the solution architecture components that will enable the Smart Grid including the measurement, monitoring and control. For the INDE architecture, this may include the measuring devices, the communication network to pass data from the devices to the INDE CORE 120 applications, the INDE CORE 120 applications to persist and react to the data, analytical applications to interpret the data, the data architecture to model the measured and interpreted data, the integration architecture to exchange data and information between INDE and utility systems, the technology infrastructure to run the various applications and databases and the standards that may be followed to enable an industry standard portable and efficient solution.
Fourth, a value modeling may be performed in generating the definition of key performance indicators and success factors for the Smart Grid and the implementation of the ability to measure and rate the system performance against the desired performance factors. The disclosure above relates to the Architecture development aspect of step 3.
Blueprinting may provide a methodical approach to the definition of the smart grid in the context of the entire utility enterprise. Blueprinting may include an overall roadmap, which may lead to a baseline and systems evaluation (BASE) and to a requirements definition and analytics selection (RDAS). The RDAS process may create the detailed definition of the utility's specific smart grid.
The BASE process may establish the starting point for the utility, in terms of systems, networks, devices, and applications to support smart grid capabilities. The first part of the process is to develop a systems inventory of the grid, which may include: grid structure (such as generation, transmission lines, transmission substations, sub transmission lines, distribution substations, distribution feeders, voltage classes); grid devices (such as switches, reclosers, capacitors, regulators, voltage drop compensators, feeder inter-ties); substation automation (such as IEDs, substation LANs, instrumentation, station RTUs/computers); distribution automation (such as capacitor and switch control; fault isolation and load rollover controls; LTC coordination systems; DMS; Demand Response Management System); and grid sensors (such as sensor types, amounts, uses, and counts on distribution grids, on transmission lines and in substations); etc. Once the inventory is complete, an evaluation of the utility against a high level smart grid readiness model may be created. An as-is dataflow model and a systems diagram may also be created.
The architecture configuration (ARC) process may develop a preliminary smart grid technical architecture for the utility by combining the information from the BASE process, requirements and constraints from the RDAS process and the INDE Reference Architecture to produce a technical architecture that meets the specific needs of the utility and that takes advantage of the appropriate legacy systems and that conforms to the constraints that exist at the utility. Use of the INDE Reference Architecture may avoid the need to invent a custom architecture and ensures that accumulated experience and best practices are applied to the development of the solution. It may also ensure that the solution can make maximum use of reusable smart grid assets.
The sensor network architecture configuration (SNARC) process may provide a framework for making the series of decisions that define the architecture of a distributed sensor network for smart grid support. The framework may be structured as a series of decision trees, each oriented to a specific aspect of sensor network architecture. Once the decisions have been made, a sensor network architecture diagram may be created.
The sensor allocation via T-section recursion (SATSECTR) process may provide a framework for determining how many sensors should be placed on the distribution grid to obtain a given level of observability, subject to cost constraints. This process may also determine the sensor types and locations.
The solution element evaluation and components template (SELECT) process may provide a framework for evaluation of solution component types and provides a design template for each component class. The template may contain a reference model for specifications for each of the solution elements. These templates may then be used to request vendor quotations and to support vendor/product evaluations.
The upgrade planning for applications and networks (UPLAN) process may provide for development of a plan to upgrade of existing utility systems, applications, and networks to be ready for integration into a smart grid solution. The risk assessment and management planning (RAMP) process may provide an assessment of risk associated with specific elements of the smart grid solution created in the ARC process. The UPLAN process may assesses the level or risk for identified risk elements and provides an action plan to reduce the risk before the utility commits to a build-out. The change analysis and management planning (CHAMP) process may analyze the process and organizational changes that may be needed for the utility to realize the value of the smart grid investment and may provide a high level management plan to carry out these changes in a manner synchronized with the smart grid deployment. The CHAMP process may result in a blueprint being generated.
The roadmap in the value modeling process may lead to specifying value metrics, which may lead to estimation of cost and benefits. The estimation may lead to the building of one or more cases, such as a rate case and business case, which in turn may lead to a case closure. The output of blueprinting and the value modeling may be sent to the utility for approval, which may result in utility system upgrades and smart grid deployments and risk reduction activities. After which, the grid may be designed, built and tested, and then operated.
As discussed with regard to the
In one example, each event message received by the outage intelligence application may indicate that an associated smart meter 163 is operating according to normal service. At block 2000, based on the event messages, the outage intelligence application may determine the state of a particular smart meter 163 to be of “normal service.” The state of normal service may indicate that the particular smart meter 163 is successfully operating and no outage or other anomalous conditions are detected by the particular smart meter 163. When the state of the particular smart meter 163 is determined to be that of normal service, the outage intelligence application may process the event messages normally, which may refer to the outage intelligence application interpreting event messages associated with the particular smart meter 163 without reference to any abnormal recent activity. Upon occurrence of a “read fail event” condition 2002 from the particular smart meter 163, at block 2004, the outage intelligence application may determine the state of the particular smart meter 163 to be “possible meter fail.” A read fail event may be any occurrence causing the outage intelligence application to be unable to filter an event message from the particular smart meter 163. A read fail event may occur when the outage intelligence application expects to receive an event message from a device, such as the particular smart meter 163, and does not receive the event message. A read fail event condition 2002 may occur for the particular smart meter 163 due to meter failure, outage condition or loss of communication between the particular smart meter 163 and the outage intelligence application.
In one example, the possible meter fail state may indicate that the particular smart meter 163 has failed based on the occurrence of the read fail event condition 2002. In the possible meter fail state, outage intelligence application may issue a request for an immediate meter remote voltage check of the particular smart meter 163. The meter remote voltage check may include sending a request for receipt of a message from the particular smart meter 163 indicating the current voltage of the smart meter 163. If the outage intelligence application receives a “voltage check ‘OK’” message 2006 transmitted by the particular meter 163 indicating that the particular meter 163 is functioning correctly, the outage intelligence application may return to the normal service state at block 2000.
The outage intelligence application may determine that the voltage check has failed, resulting in a “voltage check fails” condition 2008. The voltage check fails condition may be determined based on failure to receive a voltage check “OK” message 2006 from the particular smart meter 163. Based on the voltage check fails condition 2008, the outage intelligence application may determine that an outage associated with the particular smart meter 163 has occurred and the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular smart meter is in an “outage confirmed” state at block 2010. The outage confirmed state may indicate that a sustained outage has occurred. In transitioning to determining the outage confirmed state at block 2010, a “sustained outage event” message 2012 may be generated by the outage intelligence application. The sustained outage event message 2012 may be transmitted to the outage management system 155, which may allow the location of the sustained outage event to be determined. In other examples, the sustained outage event message 2012 may be transmitted to the fault intelligence application (see
While determining the outage confirmed state at block 2010, the outage intelligence application may issue periodic requests for a voltage check of the particular smart meter 163. If the outage intelligence application receives a voltage check OK message 2006 from the particular smart meter 163, the outage intelligence application may determine the normal service state at block 2000.
If the outage intelligence application receives a “power restoration notification (PRN)” message 2013 during the outage confirmed state, the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular smart meter 163 is the normal service state at block 2000. The PRN message 2013 may indicate that the outage no longer exists. The PRN message 2011 may originate from the particular meter 163. “Resume” messages 2015 may occur at the outage confirmed state. The resume messages 2015 may originate from higher level entities such as sections, feeder circuits, data management systems (DMS), etc.
At block 2000, the outage intelligence application may request a voltage check of the particular smart meter 163 without occurrence of a read fail event. The voltage checks may be periodically executed or may be executed based on particular power grid conditions, such as when power demand is below a particular threshold within the entire power grid or within a preselected portion of the power grid. If a voltage check fail condition 2008 is present, the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular meter 163 to the outage confirmed state 2010. In transitioning from the determination of the normal service state at block 2000 to the outage confirmed state at block 2010, a “sustained outage event” message 2012 may be generated and transmitted.
While determining the normal service state at block 2000, the outage intelligence application may receive a “power outage notification (PON)” message 2014 indicating that an outage may have occurred associated with the particular smart meter 163. The message may be received from the particular smart meter 163 or other devices upstream of the particular smart meter 163. Upon receipt of the PON message 2014, the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular smart meter 163 is in an “outage sensed” state at block 2016. In the outage sensed state, the outage intelligence application may suspend further action for a predetermined period of time. If the predetermined period of time elapses, a “timeout” condition 2018 may occur, resulting in the outage intelligence application determine that the particular meter is in the outage confirmed state at block 2010. During the transition to the outage confirmed state, the outage intelligence application may generate the sustained outage event message 2012.
If the outage intelligence application receives a power restoration notification (PRN) message 2013 from the meter collection data engine prior to the elapsing of the predetermined period of time, the outage intelligence application may generate a “momentary outage event” message 2020 indicating that the sensed outage was only momentary and the particular smart meter 163 is currently functioning correctly with no outage condition indicated by the particular smart meter 163. The momentary outage event message 2020 may be transmitted to an event log file for subsequent analysis. The outage intelligence application may also determine that the particular meter is in the normal service state at block 2000.
If the outage intelligence application receives a voltage check “OK” message 2006 prior to the timeout condition 2018, the outage intelligence application may determine that the smart meter 163 is in the normal service state at block 2000, as well as generate a momentary outage event message 2020. In each of the states at blocks 2000, 2004, 2010, and 2018, the outage intelligence application may receive a suspension message from a higher level entity such as sections, feeder circuits, DMS, etc. to suspend processing meter messages of the particular meter 163. Suspension may be based on recognition that tampering, device failure, or some other undesired condition is present that may affect the particular smart meter 163. If a suspension message 2022 exists while the outage intelligence application is in any of the states at blocks 2000, 2004, 2010, and 2018, the outage intelligence application may immediately determine that the particular smart meter 163 is in a suspend filter state at block 2024. In the suspend filter state, the outage intelligence application may suspend filtering messages from originating from the particular meter 163. A resume message 2015 received by the outage intelligence application may allow the outage intelligence application to return to the normal service state at block 2000. The resume message 2015 may be generated by sections, feeder circuits, DMS, etc. While
While the outage intelligence application determines that the particular line sensor is in the sensor fail state at block 2104, the outage intelligence application may issue a sensor health check. Upon receipt of the a “health check ‘OK’” message 2106 from the particular line sensor indicating that the line sensor has not failed, the outage intelligence application may determine that the line sensor is in a normal service state at block 2100. If no health check “OK” message is received, the outage intelligence application continues to determine whether the particular line sensor has possibly failed at the block 2104.
While the outage intelligence application determines whether the particular line sensor is in a normal service state at block 2100, a “voltage lost” condition 2108 may occur causing the outage intelligence application to determine an outage sensed state indicating that the particular line sensor is involved with a sensed outage. The voltage lost condition 2108 may occur when the outage intelligence application fails to receive an expected event message indicating that the voltage of the particular line sensor is at a desired level. The voltage lost condition 2108 may cause the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular line sensor is an outage sensed condition at block 2110, indicating that the particular line sensor is experiencing an outage. While determining that the particular line sensor is in the outage sensed state, the outage intelligence application may determine if the voltage fail condition 2108 is indicative of a momentary or sustained outage. In one example, the outage intelligence application may suspend further action for a predetermined period of time. If the predetermined period of time elapses, a “timeout” condition 2112 may occur, resulting in the outage intelligence application determining that a sustained outage condition has resulted, and the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular line sensor is in an outage confirmed state at block 2114. During the transition to determining the outage confirmed state, the outage intelligence application may generate a “sustained outage event” message 2116, which may be transmitted to the outage management system 155 for subsequent outage analysis regarding location and extent. If the outage intelligence application receives a “voltage restored” message 2118 while determining that the particular line sensor is in an outage sensed state but prior to expiration of the predetermined amount of time, the outage intelligence application may determine that the outage is momentary and may determine that the particular line sensor is in a normal service state at block 2100. While transitioning to determining the state at block 2100, a momentary outage event message 2120 may be generated by the outage intelligence application and transmitted to the outage management system 155. If the outage intelligence application receives a voltage restored message 2118 while determining that the particular line sensor is in an outage confirmed state, the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular line sensor is in the normal service state at block 2100.
If the outage intelligence application receives a “fault current detected” message 2122, the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular line sensor is in a fault sensed state at block 2124. If the fault current detected message 2122 is received, the outage intelligence application may generate a fault message 2125 to be received by various applications, such as the fault intelligence application (see
Similar to that described with regard to
If the outage intelligence application receives a “local FCI fault” message 2208, the outage intelligence application may determine that a fault has occurred at the particular FCI. Upon receipt of the particular FCI fault message 2208, the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular FCI is in a fault current detect state at block 2210. While transitioning to determining that the particular FCI is in the fault current detect state, the outage intelligence application may generate a fault message 2211 to various applications such as the fault intelligence application and to upstream FCIs. Upon receipt of a reset message 2212 from the particular FCI, the outage intelligence application may generate a reset message 2213 to FCIs upstream of the particular FCI and may determine that the particular FCI is in a normal state at block 2200.
If the outage intelligence application receives a downstream FCI faulted message 2214 from a downstream FCI, the outage intelligence application may determine whether the particular FCI is in a downstream fault state 2216. While determining whether a downstream fault exists, the outage intelligence application may suspend message processing from the particular FCI. Upon receipt of a downstream FCI reset message 2218 from a downstream FCI, the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular FCI is in a normal state at block 2100. While
If the capacitor bank is out of service due to scheduled maintenance or due to operational failure, the outage intelligence application may receive an “out of service” message 2302. Upon receipt of the message 2302, the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular capacitor bank is in an “out of service” state at block 2304. While the outage intelligence application determines that the particular capacitor bank is out of service, the outage intelligence application may suspend processing of event messages regarding the particular capacitor bank. The outage intelligence application may receive a “return to service” message 2306 from the particular capacitor bank, indicating that the particular capacitor bank is available for service, allowing the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular capacitor bank is in an off state at block 2300.
The particular capacitor bank may be turned on at some point in time through receipt of an “on” command from any device within the power grid having authority to do so. The outage intelligence application may be notified that the particular capacitor bank has been turned on via an “on command” message 2308. The outage intelligence application may determine that the particular capacitor bank is in an “on pending” state at block 2310 based on the message 2308. In determining the on pending state, the outage intelligence may receive an operational effectiveness (OE) fail message 2312 indicating that the capacitor bank was not turned on, causing the operational intelligence application to determining that the capacitor bank is in an off state at block 2300. Operational effectiveness may refer to an indication that a particular device, such as a capacitor bank, carries out a particular command, such as an “on” command. If the outage intelligence application receives an ‘OE confirm on” message 2314, the outage intelligence application may determining that the particular capacitor bank is in a “capacitor bank on” state 2316, indicating that the particular capacitor bank is connected to a particular feeder circuit in the power grid. In transitioning to determining the state 2316, the outage intelligence application may generate a “capacitor bank on” message 2318 that may be received by various devices, such as an interconnected feeder circuit using the voltage generated by the particular capacitor bank.
While determining that the particular capacitor bank is in the on pending state at block 2310, the outage intelligence application may receive an off command message 2320 from any device authorized to turn off the particular capacitor bank, causing the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular capacitor bank is in an “off pending” state at block 2322. While determining that the particular capacitor bank is in the off pending state at block 2318, the outage intelligence application may receive an on command message 2408, causing the outage intelligence application to determining that the particular capacitor bank is in the on pending state at block 2310. If the outage intelligence application receives an off command message 2320 while determining that the particular capacitor bank is in the capacitor bank on state at block 2316, the outage intelligence may determine that the particular capacitor bank is in an off pending state at block 2322.
While determining that the particular capacitor bank is in the off pending state at block 2318, the outage intelligence application may issue a request for OE confirmation. If the outage intelligence application receives an OE fail message 2312 in response, the outage intelligence application may determine that the particular capacitor bank is in the off pending state at block 2322.
While determining that the particular bank is in the capacitor bank off state at block 2300, the outage intelligence application may receive an OE confirm of message 2324, causing the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular capacitor bank is in an off pending state at block 2322. In transitioning, the outage intelligence application may generate a capacitor bank off message 2326 to be received by any devices that may desire the information regarding the particular capacitor bank. While
The outage intelligence application may receive a “switching done” message 2410 from the particular feeder circuit while determining that the particular feeder circuit is in the switching state at block 2406. Receipt of the switching done message 2410 may allow the outage intelligence application to transition back to determining whether the particular feeder circuit is in a normal operating state at block 2400. While transitioning to determine that the particular feeder circuit is in the switching state, the outage intelligence application may generate one or more “resume feeder messages” notification 2412 that may be transmitted to various devices that had previously received the suspend feeder messages notification 2408.
Outage conditions may cause a feeder circuit to be locked out based on a tripping of an interconnected breaker. In one example, the outage intelligence application may receive a “breaker trip and lockout” message 2414 while determining that the particular feeder circuit is in the normal operation state at block 2400. The breaker trip and lockout message 2414 may indicate that a breaker interconnected to the particular feeder circuit has been tripped affecting the particular feeder circuit. Receipt of the message 2414 may cause the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular feeder circuit is in a “feeder locked out” state at block 2416. In transitioning to determining the particular feeder circuit is in the feeder locked out state, the outage intelligence application may generate the suspend feeder messages notification 2408.
While determining that the particular feeder circuit is in the feeder locked out state at block 2416, the outage intelligence application may receive a reset message 2418 indicating that the tripped breaker has been reset, allowing the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular feeder circuit is in the normal operating condition at the block 2400.
A forced outage may also occur affecting the particular feeder circuit, such as through manual opening of a breaker. In one example, while determining that the particular feeder circuit is in a normal state at block 2400, the outage intelligence application may receive a “manual breaker open” message 2420 from devices included in the breaker that monitor the breaker conditions. Based on receipt of the message 2420, the outage intelligence application may transition from determining that the particular feeder circuit is in a normal operating state at block 2400 to determining that the particular feeder circuit is in a forced outage state at block 2422. The outage intelligence application may generate one or more suspend feeder messages notifications 2408 while transitioning to determining the state of the particular feeder circuit at block 2422. While determining that the particular feeder circuit is in the forced outage state, the outage intelligence application may request an immediate alternate voltage check, which provides a check on the feeder voltage using another data source such as line sensor or a smart meter 163, which may indicate such conditions such as backfeed.
The outage intelligence application may receive a reset message 2418 while determining that the particular feeder circuit is in the forced outage state. The reset message 2418 may indicate that breaker has been closed, allowing the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular feeder circuit is in the normal operating state at block 2400. While transitioning to determining the state at block 2400 from block 2422, the outage intelligence application may generate one or more resume feeder messages notification 2412. While
The outage intelligence application may also receive an “upstream section suspend” message 2506 indicating that an upstream section has been suspended. The message 2506 may be received from the upstream feeder. Receipt of the message 2506 may cause the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular section is in the possible feeder out stage at block 2504. An “alternate voltage check fails” condition 2508 may cause the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular section is in a section out state at block 2510 indicating the particular section has lost power. While transitioning to determining that the particular section is in the section out state, the outage intelligence application may generate a section out message 2512 that may be received by a downstream section and may suspend filtering of the messages from other devices associated with the section, such as smart meters 163, line sensors, etc.
An “alternative voltage check ‘OK’” message 2514 may be received by the outage intelligence application causing the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular section is in a backfeed state at block 2516, indicating that the particular section may be being backfed by other operating sections in the power grid. While determining the backfeed state, the outage intelligence application may receive an “upstream section resume” message 2518 from an upstream section allowing the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular section is in a normal operating state at block 2500.
While determining that the particular state is operating in a normal operating state, the outage intelligence application may receive a “sensor voltage loss event” message 2520, an “upstream sectionalizer opens” message 2522, and/or a “meter out” message 2524, which receipt of each may cause the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular section is in a “possible section out” state at block 2526 indicating that the particular section may be out of service. The outage intelligence application may request an alternative voltage check while determining the particular section is in the “possible section out” state at block 2526. While determining state 2526, the outage intelligence application may receive an alternate voltage check “OK” message 2514 causing the outage intelligence application to determine the particular section is in a normal operating state at block 2500. Receipt of an alternate voltage check fails message 2508 may cause the outage intelligence application to determine the particular section is operating in the section out state at block 2510 and may generate the section out message 2512.
While determining the section out state at block 2510, the outage intelligence application may receive a “voltage check ‘OK’” message 2528 indicating that the section is normally operating causing the outage intelligence application to determine the particular section is operating in the normal state at block 2500. The outage intelligence application may also generate a “section ‘OK’” message 2530 to downstream sections and may resume filtering section device messages.
While determining the particular section is in the normal operating state at block 2500, the outage intelligence application may receive a “suspend” message 2532 causing the outage intelligence application to transition to determine that the particular section is in a suspend state at block 2534. While determining that the outage intelligence application is in the suspend state, outage intelligence application may suspend processing outage messages from the particular section. The outage intelligence application may also generate one or more “suspend device” messages 2536 to be processed by devices associated with the particular section and suspend further message generation.
While determining that the particular section is in the suspend state, the outage intelligence application may receive a “resume” message 2537 from the particular section, indicating that the particular section is operating normally, thus causing the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular section is in the normal operating state at block 2500. The outage intelligence application may also generate one or more “resume device” message 2538 which may be received by processed by devices associated with the particular section and resume message generation.
While determining that the particular section is in the normal operating state at block 2500, the processed by devices associated with the particular section and suspend further message generation may receive a “switching pending” message 2540 from the particular section indicating the section is to be switched and may cause section behavior varied from normal operation. Upon receipt of the message 2540, the outage intelligence application may generate one or more suspend device messages 2336 and determine that the particular section is in a switch state at block 2542. While determining the particular section is in the switching state, the outage intelligence application may ignore section outage messages generated by the particular section. The outage intelligence application may receive a “switching done” message 2544 indicating that the switching with regard to the particular section has been performed allowing the outage intelligence application to determine that the particular section is in the normal operating state at block 2500. The outage intelligence application may also generate one or more resume device messages 2538. While
Power grid faults may be defined as physical conditions that cause a circuit element to fail to perform in the desired manner, such as physical short circuits, open circuits, failed devices and overloads. Practically speaking, most faults involve some type of short circuit and the term “fault” is often synonymous with short circuit. A short circuit may be some form of abnormal connection that causes current to flow in some path other that the one intended for proper circuit operation. Short circuit faults may have very low impedance (also known as “bolted faults”) or may have some significant amount of fault impedance. In most cases, bolted faults will result in the operation of a protective device, yielding an outage to some utility customers. Faults that have enough impedance to prevent a protective device from operating are known as high impedance (high Z) faults. Such high impedance faults may not result in outages, but may cause significant power quality issues, and may result in serious utility equipment damage. In the case of downed but still energized power lines, high impedance faults may also pose a safety hazard.
Other fault types exist, such as open phase faults, where a conductor has become disconnected, but does not create a short circuit. Open phase faults may be the result of a conductor failure resulting in disconnection, or can be the side effect of a bolted phase fault, where a lateral phase fuse has blown, leaving that phase effectively disconnected. Such open phase faults may result in loss of service to customers, but can also result in safety hazards because a seemingly disconnected phase line may still be energized through a process called backfeed. Open phase faults are often the result of a wire connection failure at a pole-top switch.
Any fault may change into another fault type through physical instability or through the effects of arcing, wire burndown, electromagnetic forces, etc. Such faults may be referred to as evolving faults and the detection of evolution processes and fault type stages are of interest to utility engineers.
In operating a power grid, detection of faults is desired, as well as fault classification and fault locating as precisely as intelligent grid instrumentation will permit. Bolted faults may be classified as either momentary self-clearing or sustained (requiring a protective device to interrupt power until the fault is cleared by field crews). For high impedance faults, distinction may be made between intermittent (happening on a recurring basis but not frequently) and persistent (happening at random but more or less constantly). Faults may also be recognized as being static or evolving (also known as multi-stage faults). As previously discussed, evolving faults may start out as one type, or involving one phase or pair of phases, then over time change to another type or involve more phases. An example of an evolving fault is a single-line-to-ground (“SLG”) fault that causes a line fuse to blow. If plasma drifts upward into overbuilt lines, a phase-to-phase fault may then evolve from the initial SLG fault.
Traditional fault detection, such as basic over-current detection and analysis are performed from measurements mostly made at the substation and in some systems, with pole-top devices such as smart switches and reclosers. However, many faults, such as the high impedance faults, are not detectable or classifiable this way because the characteristic waveforms are too dilute, especially at the substation. In the context of an intelligent grid, a distributed set of data sources may be available including line sensors with RTU's, the meters, and the substation microprocessor relays (and their associated potential transformers and current transformers). Thus, the ability exists to combine data from sensors at various points on a feeder circuit with data from other feeder circuits and even other substations if necessary to perform advanced grid fault analytics.
Table 4 describes various fault types, phase involvement, and grid state behavior of an intelligent power grid.
Establishing a clear delineation of fault types and associated grid state behavior may allow fault definitions for RTU, substation analytics, control center analytics data acquisition and processing. In one example, in a multi-phase power grid, such as a three-phase system, synchrophasor data may be utilized for fault analysis. In particular, inter-phasors may be analyzed in order to identify particular fault types occurring at the substation level.
Table 5 includes various faults that may be identified within a three-phase power grid that may cause an event to be identified at INDE SUBSTATION 180. The INDE SUBSTATION 180 or INDE CORE 120 may be configured to classify each fault type with an event code. Each event code may represent an event type recognized at the substation level, such as INDE SUBSTATION 180. Each fault type may be identified based on a plurality of predetermined qualities regarding the phasor magnitudes and phasor angles of each phase, such as A, B, and C. In one example, the individual phasors (magnitude and angle) may be analyzed, as well as the inter-phasors, which may refer to the relative phasor values between the phasors, such as A-B, B-C, and A-C. As indicated in Table 5 below, the real-time phasor values and nominal phasor values of each phase may be used to determine fault occurrences and fault type.
Upon determination that one or more possible fault conditions are present, phasor angle criteria of each phase may be applied at block 2604. At block 2606, one, some, or all fault types not meeting the predetermined phasor angle criteria based on the phase information may be eliminated from further consideration of being a possible fault type. However, if the phasor angle criteria is non-applicable to a particular fault type (designated as “N/A” in Table 5), the fault type may remain for consideration as the possible fault type. If not all fault types are to be considered, those fault types may be eliminated from consideration at block 2608.
At block 2610, predetermined relative phasor magnitude change criteria for each phase may be applied to the phase information. At block 2612, one, some, or all fault types not meeting the predetermined relative phasor magnitude information is eliminated. However, fault types still under consideration, such as being non-applicable regarding relative phasor magnitude change, may not be eliminated. At block 2614, the identified fault types may be eliminated. At block 2616, predetermined inter-phasor angle criteria may be applied to the phase information. Based on the application of the predetermined inter-phasor angle criteria, determination of any remaining possible fault types for elimination based on the predetermined inter-phasor angle criteria may be performed at block 2618. Any such fault types may be eliminated from consideration at block 2620. Any possible fault types still under consideration in which the inter-phasor angle is non-applicable may be ineligible for elimination.
At block 2622, predetermined relative inter-phasor angle change criteria may be applied to the remaining possible fault types under consideration. Any remaining possible fault types still under consideration may be identified for elimination at block 2624 based on the predetermined relative inter-phasor angle change criteria. Application of the various criteria may generate a single possible fault type at block 2624 as meeting all of the applied predetermined criteria.
At block 2626, the number of consecutive readings of the possible fault conditions may be compared to predetermined consecutive reading criteria. As shown in Table 5, possible fault conditions identified may be required to present for a number consecutive readings prior to determining that a particular fault type is present. If the number of consecutive readings is met at block 2626, a fault message may be generated by the fault intelligence application at block 2628, which may be transmitted to other devices in the power grid that may be affected by the fault or may be used to alert interested parties of the particular fault type. If the number of consecutive readings is not met, the operational flow diagram may return to the block 2600.
In
While this invention has been shown and described in connection with the preferred embodiments, it is apparent that certain changes and modifications in addition to those mentioned above may be made from the basic features of this invention. In addition, there are many different types of computer software and hardware that may be utilized in practicing the invention, and the invention is not limited to the examples described above. The invention was described with reference to acts and symbolic representations of operations that are performed by one or more electronic devices. As such, it will be understood that such acts and operations include the manipulation by the processing unit of the electronic device of electrical signals representing data in a structured form. This manipulation transforms the data or maintains it at locations in the memory system of the electronic device, which reconfigures or otherwise alters the operation of the electronic device in a manner well understood by those skilled in the art. The data structures where data is maintained are physical locations of the memory that have particular properties defined by the format of the data. While the invention is described in the foregoing context, it is not meant to be limiting, as those of skill in the art will appreciate that the acts and operations described may also be implemented in hardware. Accordingly, it is the intention of the Applicants to protect all variations and modification within the valid scope of the present invention. It is intended that the invention be defined by the following claims, including all equivalents.
This application is a divisional patent application of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/637,672 ('672), filed Dec. 14, 2009, which claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/201,856 and which is a continuation-in-part application and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/378,091 filed Feb. 11, 2009 which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(l) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/127,294 filed May 9, 2008 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/201,856 filed Dec. 15, 2008, and '672 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/378,102 filed Feb. 11, 2009 which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(l) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/127,294 filed May 9, 2008 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/201,856 filed Dec. 15, 2008. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/378,091 filed Feb. 11, 2009 which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(l) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/127,294 filed May 9, 2008 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/201,856 filed Dec. 15, 2008. The entirety of the above listed applications is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4795983 | Crockett et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 5428549 | Chen | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5940009 | Loy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 7043340 | Papallo et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 8077049 | Yaney et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 20020107615 | Bjorkland | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20060034305 | Heimerdinger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 489 714 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1 939 639 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 2006-504390 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2006-284382 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| WO 9829752 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 0248726 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 2004040731 | May 2004 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| SEL Synchrophasors, A New View of the Power System, May 12, 2008, pp. 1-8. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application PCT/US2009/067938 dated May 13, 2011, pp. 1-17. |
| Patent Examination Report No. 1 for related application AU2009333362 dated Jul. 4, 2012, pp. 1-3. |
| Examination Report for related application NZ593113 dated Sep. 12, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
| First Office Action with translation from corresponding CN Application No. 200980150251.5, dated Jul. 2, 2013 (pp. 1-12). |
| Decision to Grant Patent with translation from corresponding JP Application No. 2011-540958, dated Dec. 3, 2013 (pp. 1-6). |
| Official Notification with translation from corresponding RU Application No. 2011129332, dated Nov. 19, 2013 (pp. 1-7). |
| Written Opinion from corresponding SG Application No. 201104371-8, dated Aug. 29, 2012 (pp. 1-6). |
| Canadian Examination Report, Canadian Application No. 2,746,955, dated Dec. 14, 2016, pp. 1-7. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. |
| India Office Action, dated Feb. 6, 2017, pp. 1-8, issued in India Patent Application No. 3592/CHENP/2011, India Patent Office, Chennai, India. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150002186 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61201856 | Dec 2008 | US | |
| 61127294 | May 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12637672 | Dec 2009 | US |
| Child | 14330969 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12378091 | Feb 2009 | US |
| Child | 14330969 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12378091 | Feb 2009 | US |
| Child | 12637672 | US | |
| Parent | 12378102 | Feb 2009 | US |
| Child | 12378091 | US | |
| Parent | 14330969 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Child | 12378091 | US |
