The present invention relates, generally, to power line coupling devices and in particular, to a coupler for coupling data signals to and from power lines such as underground and overhead medium voltage cables.
Well-established power distribution systems exist throughout most of the United States, and other countries, that provide power to customers via power lines. With some modification, the infrastructure of the existing power distribution systems can be used to provide data communication in addition to power delivery, thereby forming a power distribution communication system. In other words, existing power lines that already have been run to many homes and offices can be used to carry data signals to and from the homes and offices. These data signals are communicated on and off the power lines at various points in the power distribution communication system, such as, for example, near homes, offices, Internet service providers, and the like.
While the concept may sound simple, there are many challenges to overcome in order to use power lines for data communication. Power distribution systems include numerous sections, which transmit power at different voltages. The transition from one section to another typically is accomplished with a transformer. The sections of the power line distribution system that are connected to the customers typically are low voltage (LV) sections having a voltage between 100 volts and 240 volts, depending on the system. In the United States, the low voltage section typically is about 120 volts (120V). The sections of the power distribution system that provide the power to the low voltage sections are referred to as the medium voltage (MV) sections. The voltage of the MV section is in the range of 1,000 Volts to 100,000 volts and typically 8.66 kilo volts (kV) to neutral (15 kV between phase conductors). The transition from the MV section to the LV section of the power distribution system typically is accomplished with a distribution transformer, which converts the higher voltage of the MV section to the lower voltage of the LV section.
Power system transformers are one obstacle to using power distribution lines for data communication. Transformers act as a low-pass filter, passing the low frequency signals (e.g., the 50 or 60 Hz power signals) and impeding high frequency signals (e.g., frequencies typically used for data communication) from passing through the transformer. As such, power distribution communication systems face the challenge of passing the data signals around (or sometimes through) the distribution transformers.
To bypass the distribution transformer, the bypassing system needs a method of coupling data to and from the medium voltage power line. Similarly, coupling data signals to and from the medium voltage cable at a backhaul location (a location where data signals are coupled on and off the power distribution communications system) requires the same or similar coupling means. As discussed, medium voltage power lines can operate from about 1000 V to about 100 kV, and often carry high amperage. Consequently, coupling to a medium voltage power line gives rise to safety concerns for the user installing the coupling device.
Overhead medium voltage cables typically are an uninsulated conductor. In contrast, underground residential distribution (URD) MV cables typically include a center conductor, a semi-conductive layer, a dielectric, a neutral semi-conductive jacket, and a neutral conductor. Consequently, it would be desirable to have a coupling device that couples to different types of MV cables.
In addition, the coupling device should be designed to operate to provide safe and reliable communication of data signals with a medium voltage power line—carrying high power—in all outdoor environments such as extreme heat, cold, humidity, rain, high shock, and high vibration. Also, coupling around the transformer raises concern that dangerous MV voltage levels may be provided to the customer premises on the data line, which the coupling device should prevent. In addition, a coupling device should be designed so that is does not significantly compromise the signal-to-noise ratio or data transfer rate and facilitates bi-directional communication. In addition, the coupling device (or coupler as referred to herein) should enable the transmission and reception of broadband radio frequency (RF) signals used for data transmission in MV cables.
Many couplers that have been designed prior to this invention have relied on direct contact with the MV power line, which typically carries a phase-to-phase 15 kV, 60 Hertz power transmission. The phase-to-earth ground voltage of the 15 kV system is 8.66 kV. As a consequence, the electronics and power supplies associated with the couplers have to be built to isolate the 8.66 kV potential from earth ground. Various embodiments of the coupler of the present invention may provide many of the above features and overcome the disadvantages of the prior art.
The coupler of the present invention couples broadband RF signals to and from a MV cable. The coupler of one embodiment for use with underground power lines includes a coupling transformer that includes a plurality of core members that are disposed between the semi-conductive ground jacket and neutral conductor of a standard URD MV cable. The core members are series wound by a transformer conductor, which forms a secondary winding. Disposed on each side of the coupling transformer in this embodiment is a filter that attenuates interference that approaches the coupling transformer. In addition, a spacing mechanism disposed on each side of the coupling transformer holds the neutral conductor in spaced apart relation to the neutral semi-conductive ground jacket, which has a resistance much greater than that of the neutral conductor. When the neutral conductor is spaced apart, the greater resistance of the semi-conductive ground jacket forces the data return signal onto the neutral conductor, which increases the coupling of the data signal of the MV cable to the coupling transformer.
In another embodiment of the present invention for use in coupling data signals with an overhead power line, the coupling transformer is mounted to a length of URD MV cable, which has a hot clamp attached to each end of the center conductor. The hot clamps are connected to the overhead MV power line on opposite sides of a low pass filter. The neutral conductor of the URD MV cable is removed and the semi-conductive jacket may be coupled to ground via a low frequency conductive path.
Further features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the present invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form part of the specification, illustrate various embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth, such as particular networks, communication systems, computers, terminals, devices, components, techniques, data and network protocols, software products and systems, enterprise applications, operating systems, enterprise technologies, middleware, development interfaces, hardware, etc. in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention.
However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these specific details. Detailed descriptions of well-known networks, communication systems, computers, terminals, devices, components, techniques, data and network protocols, software products and systems, enterprise applications, operating systems, enterprise technologies, middleware, development interfaces, and hardware are omitted so as not to obscure the description of the present invention.
I. System Architecture and General Design Concepts
The coupler of the present invention may be used in a transformer bypass device, a backhaul point, or at any location at which it is desirable to couple data signals to and/or from a power line. The present invention may be used to communicate data signals with (i.e., couple data signals to and/or from) both underground and overhead power lines.
The present invention makes use of the architecture of existing URD MV cables. As shown in
It should be noted that
In this embodiment, the coupling transformer 110 has a primary winding that is comprised of a single turn. The inner half-turn of the single turn is formed by the inner components of the MV cable 10, including the center conductor 15, the semi-conductive layer 20, the dielectric 25, and the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30, which pass through the openings of the toroids 120. The outer half-turn is comprised of the neutral conductor 40 and the characteristic impedance between the neutral conductor 40 and inner components of the MV cable 10. From a functional perspective, the current coupled by the coupling transformer 110 is largely induced to/from the current loop composed of the center conductor 15 and the neutral conductor 40 as will be discussed in more detail below.
The coupling device 100 operates in either receive or transmit mode. First, operation of the coupling device 100 in receive mode will be discussed. Operation of the coupling device 100 in transmit mode can be evaluated in an analogous fashion. Since the system is linear, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that the models and description used in receive mode apply equally as well to the transmit mode.
This embodiment of the coupling device 100 is designed to couple RF signals transmitted on center conductor 15 with the return RF current on the neutral conductor 40. As is well-known in the art, the magnetic flux induced in a core by a current in a conductor passing on one side of a core member will add to the magnetic flux induced in the core by a current traveling in a direction opposite to the first current in a conductor on the other side of the core member.
In this embodiment, the magnetic flux induced by the RF current in a conductor passing through the transformer toroids 120 (the core members) will add to the magnetic flux induced by the return RF current on the outside of the transformer toroids 120. Referring to
In this embodiment, it is undesirable to allow a return RF current that would otherwise be in the neutral conductor 40 to travel through the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 at the coupling transformer 110. Such a return current would reduce the current flowing on the outside of the toroids 120 through the neutral 40 and may induce flux that would subtract from the flux induced by currents in conductors 15 and 40. Reduced flux in the cores 120 will cause reduced currents in the windings of the current transformer 110, which result in less power delivered to connector 300 (i.e., less coupling).
Thus, depending on the configuration of the embodiment, it may be is desirable to reduce the amount of current present on the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30, which can be accomplished by insuring that the impedance between points “C” and “D” through the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 is much greater than the impedance between those points along the neutral 40. The RF current will split inversely proportional to the impedances of these two paths. The neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 is resistive and is a high loss transmission medium. Therefore, by increasing the distance over which signals must travel until reaching the point where the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 contacts the neutral conductor 40 (e.g., point “C”), the impedance of the neutral semi-conductive jacket signal path can be increased. Increasing the impedance of the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 ensures that little or no current flows through the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30. As a result, most of the RF return current (and power) will travel through neutral 40 (as opposed to the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30) at the coupling transformer 110 and will induce an additive flux in the transformer core material 120.
In this embodiment, the impedance of the neutral semi-conductive jacket signal path is increased through the use of a pair of insulating spacers 150. The spacers 150 hold the neutral conductor 40 in spaced apart relation from the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 for a distance “K” on each side of the coupling transformer 110. The desired distance “K” will be dependent, at least in part, on the intrinsic impedance of the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30, the desired amplitude of the data signals, the desired distance of transmission, and other factors. The insulating spacers 150 in this embodiment are toroids disposed between the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 and the neutral conductor 40 on each side of the coupling transformer 10 to hold the neutral conductor 40 away from, and not in contact with, the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 to thereby increase the resistance of the neutral semi-conductive signal path as seen from the coupling transformer 110.
The neutral conductor 40 may be held in spaced apart relation away from, and not in contact with, the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 by any means. For example, fewer or more insulating spacers 150 may be used depending on the size of the insulating spacers 150 and the desired impedance. In addition, other components, such as a toroid used as a core forming a transformer for supplying power, may be used as an insulating spacer 150 in addition to or instead of insulating spacers 150 having no other function. Furthermore, the insulating spacers 150 may be any desirable size or shape and, in some embodiments, may only be necessary or desirable on one side of the coupling transformer 110. In other embodiments, the insulating spacer 150 may be an insulator, but one that does not hold the neutral conductor 40 away from the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30. Such an insulator may be around the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 and/or around neutral conductor 40 adjacent the coupling transformer 110. In addition, other embodiments of the present invention may not require a spacer because, for example, there is no need to increase the resistance of the neutral semi-conductive jacket signal path.
Because the center conductor 15 of the MV cable 10 typically is at high voltage, there will often be leakage current from the center conductor 15 to the neutral semi-conductor jacket 30. Depending on the distance that the neutral conductor 40 is held away from the neutral semi-conductor jacket 30, it may be desirable to provide a conductive path between the neutral conductor 40 and the neutral semi-conductor jacket 30 at one or more places along the length of the coupling device 100. In this embodiment, a conductive path 170 is disposed between the insulating spacers 150 on each side of the coupling transformer 110. The conductive path 170 is formed by a semi-conductive collar 175 disposed around and in contact with the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 and which is coupled to a conductor that is coupled to the neutral 40. An RF choke 180 (e.g., low pass filter) also is disposed in the conductive path in order to prevent high frequency data signals from passing through the conductive path 170 so that the conductive path 170 is a low frequency conductive path. As is well known to those skilled in the art, the RF choke (e.g., low pass filter) 180 may be any device, circuit, or component for filtering (i.e., preventing the passage of) high frequency signals such as an inductor, which, for example, may be a ferrite toroid (or ferrite bead).
Moving the neutral conductor 40 away from the center conductor 15 increases the impedance of the MV cable 10 and increases the susceptibility of the cable to external RF interference and radiation. This susceptibility is reduced through use of a filter, which in this embodiment is formed with toroids. The toroid filters 160 are disposed around the entire MV cable 10 at each end of the coupling transformer 110. Typically, interference and radiation will be induced in both the neutral conductor 40 and center conductor 15. If the interference source is distant from the cable, the radiation will be uniform at the cable. The direction of the induced noise current will be the same in all conductors of the MV cable 10. This interference and radiation is known as “common mode noise.” Toroids 160 comprise a common mode noise filter, as is well known in the art. When such interference signal, which is traveling on the neutral conductor 40 and center conductor 15, reaches the toroid filter 160, the interference signal induces a magnetic flux in the toroid filter 160.
The flux created by current on neutral conductor 40 and center conductor 15 is in the same direction and adds in the toroid filter 160. Thus, the toroid filter 160 absorbs the energy of the interference signal thereby attenuating (i.e., filtering) the interference signal so that it does not reach the coupling transformer 110.
The data signals, however, pass through the toroid filter 160 largely unimpeded. The signals carrying data in the center conductor 15 and in the neutral conductor 40 are substantially the same amplitude, but opposite in direction. Consequently, the flux of the signals cancels each other so that no flux is induced in the toroid filter 160 and the signals are substantially unattenuated.
As discussed, the coupling transformer 110 includes a plurality of series-wound transformer toroids 120 adjacent to the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30. The use of multiple core members improves the coupling between the primary and secondary windings, and reduces the susceptibility of the windings to RF noise pick-up.
The longitudinal length (“M” in
In practice, a transformer, such as the coupling transformer 110, will have an input impedance composed of an equivalent resistance, and an equivalent reactance. The equivalent resistance corresponds to the real power transferred. The equivalent reactance is caused by the inductance and parasitic capacitance created by the coils of the coupling transformer 110. If the input impedance is dominated by the reactance, the percentage of power of the data signal that is coupled to the primary is reduced (i.e., influences the power factor). By adding the appropriate reactance, a coupling circuit that includes the secondary winding can be created that has a resonant frequency near the center of the communication band carrying the data signals to thereby increase and/or optimize the portion of the data signal power coupled to the power line (i.e., reduce the amount of power lost in the windings themselves). The geometry, placement, size, insulation, number, and other characteristics of the secondary winding 130 of coupling transformer 110 provide a parasitic (intrinsic) capacitance, that in this example embodiment of the present invention, provides a coupling circuit having a resonant frequency substantially at the center of the band of frequencies communicating the data signals, which is in this embodiment is approximately 40 Mhz (i.e., the center between the 30 Mhz and 50 Mhz communication channel). Providing a resonant frequency at the center of the band of frequencies communicating the data signals provides a coupling circuit that is matched to, and may provide improved performance over, the communication channel. The addition of an inductor-capacitor-resonant circuit may improve the power factor of the device in some embodiments. Other embodiments (due to manufacturing) may have resonant frequencies within twenty percent, more preferably within ten percent, and still more preferably within five percent of the center of the band of frequencies communicating the data signals.
The secondary winding 130 of the coupling transformer 110 is coupled to a primary winding of an impedance matching transformer 200, which in this embodiment uses a ferrite toroid as the core. The secondary winding of the impedance matching transformer 200 is coupled to a fifty ohm BNC connector 300. The impedance matching transformer 200 steps down the impedance of the coupling transformer 110 to match the 50 Ohm impedance of the BNC connector 300. In this embodiment, the impedance matching transformer 200 has eight turns on its primary side and four turns on its secondary side.
During operation, a data signal to be transmitted is injected into the 50 Ohm BNC connector 300 and coupled through the impedance matching transformer 200 to the secondary of the coupling transformer 110. The coupling transformer 110 couples the signal onto the center conductor 15 and the neutral conductor 40. The coupling device 100 at a remote location down the MV cable 10 receives the data signal. For example, a coupling device according to the present invention may be positioned at each end of a URD cable, which may be hundreds of meters long. Data signals transmitted from the first coupling device 100 induce a magnetic flux in the coupling transformer of the second coupling device (not shown). The flux induces a current in the secondary winding 130 of the second coupling device 100, which passes through the impedance matching transformer 200 to the BNC connector 300 of the second coupling device 100.
II. Applications
As discussed, the coupling device 100 couples data signals (e.g., RF signals) to and/or from a power line, which, in the embodiment above, is a medium voltage power line. Other embodiments of the present invention may be used to couple signals to low voltage and/or high voltage power lines.
The coupling device 100 may be located at any desired location to couple data signals to and/or from a power line, including at a backhaul point or forming part of a transformer bypass device at a transformer. Such a bypass device may include one or more of a low voltage signal processing circuit (which may include a filter, amplifier, and other components) a low voltage modem, a microprocessor and associated software, a router, a medium voltage modem, and medium voltage processing circuitry. Likewise, a backhaul device may include some subset of these components and/or other components.
URD MV cables typically are hundreds of meters long and typically extend from transformer to transformer. Consequently, the coupler 100 may be integrated into the end of the URD MV cable (during manufacturing or through a postproduction process) so that the coupler 100 resides inside the transformer enclosure (e.g., a pad mounted transformer). Alternately, the coupler 100 may be formed as an adapter that has a first end with a first connector (e.g., a plug) that is configured to mate with a socket of the transformer and a second end that has a second connector (e.g., a receptacle) that is configured to mate with the end or plug of a conventional URD MV cable, which is preferably a conventional, commercially available MV cable. In addition, in any of the embodiments the entire coupler 100 may be encased in environmentally protective encasing and/or disposed in a protective housing—for example, so that only the URD MV cable and the data cable (including the connector 300) extend from the encasing or housing.
Extending from the transformer enclosure typically is a number of low voltage power lines. One use of the coupler 100 is to couple data signals to and from the URD MV cable as part of a transformer bypass device. The transformer bypass device transmits signals, which may be based on the signals received though the coupler 100, to one or more of the low voltage lines that extend to the customer premises from the transformer enclosure. Similarly, the bypass device provides signals, at least a portion of which are based on data signals received from the low voltage power lines of customer premises to the coupler 100 for transmission down the MV URD cable.
In addition, transformer enclosures often have two URD MV cables extending therefrom. For example, one of the two cables may carry power from the power source (referred to herein as a power input cable) and the other cable may transmit power down line to further destinations (referred to herein as a power output cable). In addition to or instead of providing communications through the low voltage power lines, the coupler of the present invention may form part of a repeater device that acts as an amplifier or repeater to transmit the data signals received from a coupler coupled to a first URD MV cable (e.g., a power input cable) through a second coupler and down a second URD MV cable (e.g., a power output cable) extending from the same (or nearby) transformer enclosure. Alternately, the repeater may receive and transmit (e.g., directionally transmit to amplify or repeat the signal) through the same coupler so that only a single coupler is necessary. The repeater device may amplify and transmit all the data signals, select data signals such as those having destination addresses for which transmission down the second cable is necessary, those select data signals that it determines should be repeated (such as all data signals not transmitted to the repeater itself), those data signals that a bypass device (or other device) indicates should be repeated, some other set of data signals as may otherwise be desired, and/or some combination thereof. Thus, the bypass and repeater devices may include a router.
In one example application, a first and second coupler 100 is disposed at the end of two URD MV cables (either integrated therein or in an adapter) that extend from the same (or nearby) transformer enclosure. The transformer bypass device is communicatively coupled to both couplers 100 and to any of the low voltage cables along which data signals may need to be communicated. Thus, the bypass device may act as both a repeater and bypass device.
III. Overhead Application
In addition to URD MV cables, the coupler 100 of the present invention may be used to couple data signals to and/or from overhead MV cables. Overhead MV cables typically are comprised of a stranded conductor without insulation, and without a dielectric, or a neutral semi-conductive jacket. In essence, the overhead MV cable typically is a bare conductor. Normally, three cables run in parallel (one cable for each phase of the three phase MV power) along with a neutral conductor.
As with its use in URD MV cables, in its overhead applications the coupler 100 may form part of a transformer bypass device or backhaul point for coupling signals to and/or from the MV power line, or for coupling data signals to and/or from a power line for any other desired device or purpose.
To couple signals to and from the overhead MV cable, the coupling device 100 is formed with a length of URD MV cable, which as described above includes the center conductor 15, a semi-conductive layer 20, a dielectric 25 (an insulator), a neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 and the neutral conductor 40. The URD MV cable, for example, may be six gauge, eight kV cable. As shown in
In this embodiment, the center conductor 15 of each end of the URD MV cable, however, is terminated with a hot wire clamp 401. The connection of the hot wire clamp 401 to a URD cable is well-known in the art. One means for connecting the hot wire clamp to the URD cable is using a 3M Quick Term II Termination Kit, sold by 3M Corporation. The neutral conductor 40 of each end of the URD MV cable is coupled to the neutral conductor of the MV cable. Alternately, as shown in
Each hot wire clamp 401 is attached to the overhead MV cable. A data filter such as a RF choke 400 (or low pass filter) is disposed on the MV cable between the hot wire clamps 401. The data filter allows the power transmissions to pass unimpeded, but provides a high impedance to data signals. As a result, data signals are shunted around the filter 400 and through the URD MV cable and coupler 100. The coupler operates as described above to couple signals to and from the URD MV cable. The data signals are transmitted on the overhead MV cable in both directions away from the filter 400.
Another embodiment of the present invention configured to couple data signals to and from the overhead power line is shown in FIG. 5. This embodiment includes a coupling transformer 100 with twelve coupling transformer toroids 120, which are series-wound with three turns per toroid. As discussed above, in practice the toroids 120 are positioned close to each other and are shown spaced apart in
This embodiment uses a length of six gauge, eight kV URD MV cable 500, which as with the other overhead embodiments, terminates with a 3M Quick Term II or equivalent termination kit. The two hot wire clamps 401 are clamped to the MV power line on either side of the RF choke 400. The clamps 401 may be attached to the ends of a housing that houses the RF choke (or low pass filter) 400. The housing may be formed of two portions, which are hinged together to allow for an open and closed configuration. The RF choke 400 may be formed of ferrite toroids, which are formed of two halves fixed in each portion of the housing and that mate together when the housing is in the closed configuration. Such a housing is disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 07/176,500 entitled “A Power Line Coupling Device and Method of Using the Same,” which is hereby incorporated by reference. Such a housing, or a housing having many of these features, may also be used to hold the coupling transformer for use in the underground embodiment of the present invention as will be evident to those skilled in the art.
As shown in
Because this embodiment does not employ the neutral conductor, it also need not use an insulating spacer, or a toroid filter. As is known in the art, the overhead cables running parallel to each other will have a natural inductance along their lengths and capacitance between them, which is based on, among other things, the distance between the cables. These inductances and capacitances are substantially equivalent to a resistance between the conductors. This resistance is known as the “characteristic impedance” of the line. Without the neutral conductor 40, the primary winding of the coupling transformer 110 of this embodiment may be comprised of the center conductor of the URD MV cable and nearby power line cables such as one or both of the other two phase conductors as well the characteristic impedance between the cables. In addition, the neutral conductor may form all or part of the primary winding depending on what other overhead cables are present. Furthermore, other conductors, such as conductors of another three phase power line, may form part of the primary winding.
As will be evident to those skilled in the art, a first coupling device 100 may communicate with a second coupling device 100 that is on the same conductor as the first coupling device or placed on another conductor that forms part of the primary of the coupling transformer 110 of the first coupling device 100 (such as one of the other phase conductors, the neutral, or a conductor of a different three phase conductor set). Thus, the present invention facilitates communicating across conductors as well as through a single conductor.
While not shown in
Also, optionally the ends of the URD MV cable may be attached to the MV power line through a fuse. In particular, the hot wire clamps may be attached to a fuse on each end (instead of the power line) with the opposite ends of the fuses attached to the power line. The fuses prevent a catastrophic failure in the coupling device from impacting the electrical distribution system.
As will be evident from the above description, the coupler 100 of the above embodiment is not voltage referenced to the MV conductor. Because the coupling device 100 is surrounded by cable components which are at ground potential, the electronics and power supplies associated with the coupler (e.g., in the associated device components—modems, router, filters, amplifiers, processors and other signal processing circuitry) of the backhaul device, bypass device, or other device processing received and/or transmitted signals) do not have to be built to isolate the 8.66 kV potential from earth ground or from the low voltage power lines (which may be connected to the customer premises), which greatly reduces the complexity and cost of such a system. In other words, the coupler of the present invention provides electrical isolation from the medium voltage power lines (due to the insulation provided by the URD MV cable) while facilitating data communications therewith.
As will be evident to one skilled in the art, many of the components of the above embodiments may be omitted or modified in alternate embodiments. For example, the conductive path 170 between the neutral conductor 40 and the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 may be omitted on one or both sides of the coupling transformer 100. Similarly, other methods for reducing (or preventing) the amount of energy that is coupled onto the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 may be used in addition to or instead of the insulating spacers 150. For example, another embodiment of the present invention may include removing a portion of the neutral semi-conductive jacket around the entire circumference of the MV cable (on one or both sides of the coupling transformer) to increase the impedance of the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 and thereby prevent coupling thereto. This alternate embodiment would likely be most suitable for the overhead application described above with reference to
Also, instead of BNC connector 300, a URD MV cable connector may be used to connect the output of the transformer 200 to another URD MV cable that conducts the data signal to the data processing circuitry, which may include one or more of a filter, an amplifier, an isolator, a modem, and a data router.
In addition, some embodiments of the present invention may include only one or neither of the filters 160. Such an embodiment likely would be most suitable for environments or locations in which anticipated external radiation and interference are minimal (or where the neutral conductor 40 is not used). Also, other embodiments may employ different positioning of the filters, such as outside the insulating spacers 150 or may employ different means for attenuating the interference or high frequency non-data signals such as different type of filter.
The embodiments described above include four or twelve series-wound transformer toroids 120 adjacent to the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30. Other embodiments may include fewer (e.g., one, two or three) or more (e.g., five, six, fifteen, twenty or more) transformer toroids 120, which may or may not be series wound. In addition, as will be evident to those skilled in the art, each core member may be formed by a single toroid or a plurality of toroids disposed substantially adjacent to each other. In addition, the material from which the toroids are formed may be material other than ferrite. Similarly, the number of windings may be greater or fewer than the number disclosed for the above embodiment, but preferably less than ten windings and even more preferably less than six windings. Furthermore, the toroids may be series wound in pairs, in groups of three, groups of four, and/or some combination thereof Some embodiments may not require series-wound core members or a plurality of core members.
Depending on the desired isolation and the impedance of the URD MV cable, the number of windings, the impedance of the connector 300, and other factors, the impedance matching transformer 200 may not be required or may be provided as an isolation transformer only for isolation purposes (as opposed to providing an impedance matching function).
Any toroids employed by the present invention may be slid down over the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 or may be formed of two toroid halves that are pivoted together around the neutral semi-conductive jacket 30 (e.g., in a housing that pivots open and closed similar to that incorporated herein above). While the core members of the above embodiments are toroids, the core members of alternate embodiments may be formed of partial toroids such as a three quarter toroid, a half toroid, a toroid with a gap, or a non-toroid shape. Similarly, the filter 160 and insulating spacers 150 may be formed of partial toroids such as a three quarter toroid, a half toroid, a toroid with a gap, or a non-toroid shape.
Finally, the embodiments of the present invention described herein include a semi-conductive jacket. However, some embodiments may not employ a semi-conductive jacket and use only a conductor and surrounding insulator (e.g., an embodiment for overhead applications).
The foregoing has described the principles, embodiments, and modes of operation of the present invention. However, the invention should not be construed as being limited to the particular embodiments described above, as they should be regarded as being illustrative and not as restrictive. It should be appreciated that variations may be made in those embodiments by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention.
While a preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described above, it should be understood that it has been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by the above described exemplary embodiments.
Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/391,523 filed Jun. 24, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1547242 | Strieby | Jul 1925 | A |
2298435 | Tunick | Oct 1942 | A |
2577731 | Berger | Dec 1951 | A |
3369078 | Stradley | Feb 1968 | A |
3445814 | Spalti | May 1969 | A |
3605009 | Enge | Sep 1971 | A |
3641536 | Prosprich | Feb 1972 | A |
3656112 | Paull | Apr 1972 | A |
3696383 | Oishi et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3701057 | Hoer | Oct 1972 | A |
3702460 | Blose | Nov 1972 | A |
3810096 | Kabat et al. | May 1974 | A |
3846638 | Wetherell | Nov 1974 | A |
3895370 | Valentini | Jul 1975 | A |
3900842 | Calabro et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3911415 | Whyte | Oct 1975 | A |
3942168 | Whyte | Mar 1976 | A |
3942170 | Whyte | Mar 1976 | A |
3962547 | Pattantyus-Abraham | Jun 1976 | A |
3964048 | Lusk et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3967264 | Whyte et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3973087 | Fong | Aug 1976 | A |
3973240 | Fong | Aug 1976 | A |
4004110 | Whyte | Jan 1977 | A |
4004257 | Geissler | Jan 1977 | A |
4012733 | Whyte | Mar 1977 | A |
4016429 | Vercellotti et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4017845 | Killian et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4053876 | Taylor | Oct 1977 | A |
4057793 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4060735 | Pascucci et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4070572 | Summerhayes | Jan 1978 | A |
4119948 | Ward et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4142178 | Whyte et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4188619 | Perkins | Feb 1980 | A |
4239940 | Dorfman | Dec 1980 | A |
4250489 | Dudash et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4254402 | Perkins | Mar 1981 | A |
4263549 | Toppeto | Apr 1981 | A |
4268818 | Davis et al. | May 1981 | A |
4323882 | Gajjar | Apr 1982 | A |
4357598 | Melvin, Jr. | Nov 1982 | A |
4359644 | Foord | Nov 1982 | A |
4367522 | Forstbauer et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4383243 | Krügel et al. | May 1983 | A |
4386436 | Kocher et al. | May 1983 | A |
4408186 | Howell | Oct 1983 | A |
4409542 | Becker et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4413250 | Porter et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4419621 | Becker et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4433284 | Perkins | Feb 1984 | A |
4442492 | Karlsson et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4457014 | Bloy | Jun 1984 | A |
4468792 | Baker et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4471399 | Udren | Sep 1984 | A |
4473816 | Perkins | Sep 1984 | A |
4473817 | Perkins | Sep 1984 | A |
4475209 | Udren | Oct 1984 | A |
4479033 | Brown et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4481501 | Perkins | Nov 1984 | A |
4495386 | Brown et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4504705 | Pilloud | Mar 1985 | A |
4517548 | Ise et al. | May 1985 | A |
4569045 | Schieble et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4599598 | Komoda et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4636771 | Ochs | Jan 1987 | A |
4638298 | Spiro | Jan 1987 | A |
4642607 | Strom et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4644321 | Kennon | Feb 1987 | A |
4652855 | Weikel | Mar 1987 | A |
4668934 | Shuey | May 1987 | A |
4675648 | Roth et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4683450 | Max et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4686382 | Shuey | Aug 1987 | A |
4686641 | Evans | Aug 1987 | A |
4697166 | Warnagiris et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4701945 | Pedigo | Oct 1987 | A |
4724381 | Crimmins | Feb 1988 | A |
4745391 | Gajjar | May 1988 | A |
4746897 | Shuey | May 1988 | A |
4749992 | Fitzmeyer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4766414 | Shuey | Aug 1988 | A |
4772870 | Reyes | Sep 1988 | A |
4785195 | Rochelle et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4800363 | Braun et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4815106 | Propp et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4835517 | van der Gracht et al. | May 1989 | A |
4890089 | Shuey | Dec 1989 | A |
4903006 | Boomgaard | Feb 1990 | A |
4904996 | Fernandes | Feb 1990 | A |
4912553 | Pal et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4962496 | Vercellotti et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4973940 | Sakai et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4979183 | Cowart | Dec 1990 | A |
5006846 | Granville et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5066939 | Mansfield, Jr. | Nov 1991 | A |
5068890 | Nilssen | Nov 1991 | A |
5132992 | Yurt et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5148144 | Sutterlin et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151838 | Dockery | Sep 1992 | A |
5185591 | Shuey | Feb 1993 | A |
5191467 | Kapany et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5210519 | Moore | May 1993 | A |
5257006 | Graham et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5264823 | Stevens | Nov 1993 | A |
5272462 | Teyssandier et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5301208 | Rhodes | Apr 1994 | A |
5319634 | Bartholomew et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5341265 | Westrom et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351272 | Abraham | Sep 1994 | A |
5355109 | Yamazaki | Oct 1994 | A |
5359625 | Vander Mey et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5369356 | Kinney et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5375141 | Takahashi | Dec 1994 | A |
5406249 | Pettus | Apr 1995 | A |
5410720 | Osterman | Apr 1995 | A |
5426360 | Maraio et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432841 | Rimer | Jul 1995 | A |
5448229 | Lee, Jr. | Sep 1995 | A |
5461629 | Sutterlin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5477091 | Fiorina et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481249 | Sato | Jan 1996 | A |
5485040 | Sutterlin | Jan 1996 | A |
5497142 | Chaffanjon | Mar 1996 | A |
5498956 | Kinney et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
4749992 | Fitzmeyer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533054 | DeAndrea et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537087 | Naito | Jul 1996 | A |
5559377 | Abraham | Sep 1996 | A |
5568185 | Yoshikazu | Oct 1996 | A |
5579221 | Mun | Nov 1996 | A |
5579335 | Sutterlin et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5592354 | Nocentino, Jr. | Jan 1997 | A |
5592482 | Abraham | Jan 1997 | A |
5598406 | Albrecht et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5616969 | Morava | Apr 1997 | A |
5625863 | Abraham | Apr 1997 | A |
5630204 | Hylton et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640416 | Chalmers | Jun 1997 | A |
5664002 | Skinner, Sr. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684450 | Brown | Nov 1997 | A |
5691691 | Merwin et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694108 | Shuey | Dec 1997 | A |
5705974 | Patel et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712614 | Patel et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717685 | Abraham | Feb 1998 | A |
5726980 | Rickard | Mar 1998 | A |
5748104 | Argyroudis et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748671 | Sutterlin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751803 | Shpater | May 1998 | A |
5770996 | Severson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774526 | Propp et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777544 | Vander Mey et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5777545 | Patel et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5777769 | Coutinho | Jul 1998 | A |
5778116 | Tomich | Jul 1998 | A |
5796607 | Le Van Suu | Aug 1998 | A |
5798913 | Tiesinga et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801643 | Williams et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802102 | Davidovici | Sep 1998 | A |
5805053 | Patel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805458 | McNamara et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818127 | Abraham | Oct 1998 | A |
5818821 | Schurig | Oct 1998 | A |
5828293 | Rickard | Oct 1998 | A |
5835005 | Furukawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847447 | Rozin et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850114 | Froidevaux | Dec 1998 | A |
5856776 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864284 | Sanderson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870016 | Shrestha | Feb 1999 | A |
5880677 | Lestician | Mar 1999 | A |
5881098 | Tzou | Mar 1999 | A |
5892430 | Wiesman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892758 | Argyroudis | Apr 1999 | A |
5929750 | Brown | Jul 1999 | A |
5933071 | Brown | Aug 1999 | A |
5933073 | Shuey | Aug 1999 | A |
5937003 | Sutterlin et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937342 | Kline | Aug 1999 | A |
5949327 | Brown | Sep 1999 | A |
5952914 | Wynn | Sep 1999 | A |
5963585 | Omura et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977650 | Rickard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978371 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982276 | Stewart | Nov 1999 | A |
5994998 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994999 | Ebersohl | Nov 1999 | A |
6014386 | Abraham | Jan 2000 | A |
6023106 | Abraham | Feb 2000 | A |
6037678 | Rickard | Mar 2000 | A |
6037857 | Behrens et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040759 | Sanderson | Mar 2000 | A |
6091932 | Langlais | Jul 2000 | A |
6104707 | Abraham | Aug 2000 | A |
6121765 | Carlson | Sep 2000 | A |
6130896 | Lueker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140911 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141634 | Flint et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144292 | Brown | Nov 2000 | A |
6151330 | Liberman | Nov 2000 | A |
6151480 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154488 | Hunt | Nov 2000 | A |
6157292 | Piercy et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172597 | Brown | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175860 | Gaucher | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177849 | Barsellotti et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212658 | Le Van Suu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226166 | Gumley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229434 | Knapp et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239722 | Colton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243413 | Beukema | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243571 | Bullock et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255805 | Papalia et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6255935 | Lehmann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275144 | Rumbaugh | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282405 | Brown | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6297729 | Abali et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297730 | Dickinson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300881 | Yee et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313738 | Wynn | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317031 | Rickard | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331814 | Albano et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335672 | Tumlin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6373376 | Adams et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384580 | Ochoa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396391 | Binder | May 2002 | B1 |
6396392 | Abraham | May 2002 | B1 |
6404773 | Williams et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407987 | Abraham | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414578 | Jitaru | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417762 | Comer | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425852 | Epstein et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441723 | Mansfield, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449318 | Rumbaugh | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452482 | Cern | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480510 | Binder | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486747 | DeCramer et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492897 | Mowery, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496104 | Kline | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6504357 | Hemminger et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507573 | Brandt et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515485 | Bullock et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522626 | Greenwood | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522650 | Yonge, III et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549120 | De Buda | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577231 | Litwin, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6590493 | Rasimas | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611134 | Chung | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6624532 | Davidow et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6646447 | Cern et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650249 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6667685 | Wasaki et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668058 | Grimes | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683531 | Diamanti et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686832 | Abraham | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6696925 | Aiello, Jr. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6753742 | Kim et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6785532 | Rickard | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785592 | Smith et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788745 | Lim et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6809633 | Cern | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6844809 | Manis et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6844810 | Cern | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6854059 | Gardner | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20010038329 | Diamanti et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010038343 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010045888 | Kline | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052843 | Wiesman et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054953 | Kline | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002040 | Kline et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010870 | Gardner | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014884 | Chung | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027496 | Cern | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041228 | Zhang | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048368 | Gardner | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020060624 | Zhang | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071452 | Abraham | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080010 | Zhang | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095662 | Ashlock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097953 | Kline | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098867 | Meiksen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098868 | Meiksen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105413 | Cern et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109585 | Sanderson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110310 | Kline | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110311 | Kline | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118101 | Kline | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020121963 | Kline | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140547 | Litwin, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154000 | Kline | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171535 | Cern | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030007570 | Kim et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007576 | Alavi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030062990 | Schaeffer, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067910 | Razazian et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090368 | Ide | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103307 | Dostert | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030107477 | Ide | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030129978 | Akiyama et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149784 | Ide | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030179080 | Mollenkopf et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184433 | Zalitzky et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210734 | Kaku | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222747 | Perkinson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030227373 | Lou et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232599 | Dostert | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234713 | Pridmore, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001438 | Aretz | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040001499 | Patella et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037317 | Zalitzky et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047335 | Proctor et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054425 | Elmore | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064782 | Lerner et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040067745 | Belsak | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070912 | Kopp | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083066 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040174851 | Zalitzky et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
197 28 270 | Jan 1999 | DE |
100 08 602 | Jun 2001 | DE |
100 12 235 | Dec 2001 | DE |
100 47 648 | Apr 2002 | DE |
100 61 584 | Jun 2002 | DE |
100 61 586 | Jun 2002 | DE |
101 00 181 | Jul 2002 | DE |
101 03 530 | Aug 2002 | DE |
100 59 564 | Sep 2002 | DE |
100 48 348 | Nov 2002 | DE |
101 190 039 | Dec 2002 | DE |
101 190 040 | Dec 2002 | DE |
100 26 930 | Jan 2003 | DE |
100 26 931 | Jan 2003 | DE |
100 42 958 | Jan 2003 | DE |
101 47 918 | Apr 2003 | DE |
101 47 916 | May 2003 | DE |
101 46 982 | Jun 2003 | DE |
101 47 915 | Jun 2003 | DE |
101 47 913 | Jul 2003 | DE |
0 141 673 | May 1985 | EP |
0 581 351 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0 632 602 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0 470 185 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 822 721 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0 822 721 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0 913 955 | May 1999 | EP |
0 933 883 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0 933 883 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0 948 143 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0 959 569 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 011 235 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 014 640 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 043 866 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 043 866 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 075 091 | Feb 2001 | EP |
0 916 194 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1 011 235 | May 2002 | EP |
1 213 849 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1 217 760 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1 014 640 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 021 866 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 251 646 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 253 699 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2 122 920 | Dec 1998 | ES |
2 326 087 | Jul 1976 | FR |
1 548 652 | Jul 1979 | GB |
2 101 857 | Jan 1983 | GB |
2 293 950 | Apr 1996 | GB |
2 315 937 | Feb 1998 | GB |
2 331 683 | May 1999 | GB |
2 335 335 | Sep 1999 | GB |
2 341 776 | Mar 2000 | GB |
2 342 264 | Apr 2000 | GB |
2 347 601 | Sep 2000 | GB |
1276933 | Nov 1989 | JP |
276741 | Jul 1998 | NZ |
8401481 | Apr 1984 | WO |
9013950 | Nov 1990 | WO |
9216920 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9307693 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9529536 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9801905 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9833258 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9833258 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9840980 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9959261 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0016496 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0059076 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0060701 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0060822 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0108321 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0143305 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0150625 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0150625 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0150628 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0150629 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0163787 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0182497 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0217509 | Feb 2002 | WO |
0237712 | May 2002 | WO |
02054605 | Jul 2002 | WO |
02065684 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02089352 | Nov 2002 | WO |
02089353 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03009083 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03009083 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03010896 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03030396 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03034608 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03039022 | May 2003 | WO |
03040732 | May 2003 | WO |
03056715 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004008656 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004021600 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040003934 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60391523 | Jun 2002 | US |