Modular power regulators convert an input voltage to a regulated output voltage. Many of these power regulators are intended to be general purpose devices that operate over a wide range of input and output voltages. Some power regulators regulate their output voltages by charging and discharging a fixed value inductor that is coupled to the output of the power regulators. The control architecture for these power regulators includes a feedback loop to regulate the output voltage. The feedback loop includes an error amplifier.
Many of the error amplifier topologies exhibit the undesirable characteristic that their system transient responses change dramatically with the output voltage setting. For example, higher output voltage settings may result in higher transient responses. Optimizing the transient responses requires modifying the frequency compensation of the power regulator. For example, each output voltage value has a particular optimum compensation value, which requires components in the power regulator or associated with the power regulator to be changed to match the particular optimum compensation value. Accordingly, when a user changes the output voltage value, the components associated with the frequency compensation have to be changed, which is burdensome on the users.
A power regulator for converting an input voltage to an output voltage includes and inductor, wherein the output voltage of the regulator is in response to charging of the inductor at a clock frequency. An error amplifier has an inverting input coupled to the regulator output, and a non-inverting input coupled to a reference voltage. A slope compensation circuit is for generating a signal for charging the inductor. The compensation circuit includes an output coupled the circuitry for charging the inductor, wherein a signal on the output is generated in response to the input voltage, the output voltage, and the clock frequency.
The input 102 is coupled to a power stage 110 that generates a drive signal into an inductor L1. In the example of
The output 103 is coupled to a voltage divider 116 that consists of two resistors Ra and Rb, wherein the resistor Rb is variable. As described in greater detail below, the value of the resistor Rb sets the value of the output voltage VOUT. The output of the voltage divider 116 is a node N1 that is coupled to the inverting input of an error amplifier 120. The non-inverting input of the error amplifier 120 is coupled to a reference voltage VREF, which in some examples is a very stable and precise reference voltage. The output voltage VOUT is set by the voltage divider 116. More specifically, the output voltage VOUT is divided down so that the voltage at the inverting input of the error amplifier 120 is equal to the value of the reference voltage VREF.
In the example of
Power regulators such as the power regulator 100 have the undesirable characteristic that the system loop bandwidth varies directly with the amount of attenuation produced by the voltage divider 116. The greater the target output voltage, the greater the attenuation required by the voltage divider 116.
In a conventional power regulator, such as the power regulator 100, a fixed reference voltage VREF is applied to the non-inverting input of the error amplifier 120. The output voltage VOUT is set by the resistive voltage divider 116. The greater the target output voltage VOUT, the greater the required attenuation by the voltage divider 116. The principal disadvantage of this configuration is that the loop gain of the power regulator 100 is attenuated by the same amount as the voltage applied to the inverting input to the error amplifier 120. The voltage change at the input to the error amplifier 120 causes the loop gain of the power regulator 100 to change with the output voltage VOUT. The change in loop gain degrades the transient response of the power regulator 100 as described below. Another disadvantage of the power regulator 100 is that when it is implemented in an integrated circuit package, an additional node is required to monitor the output voltage VOUT of the power regulator 100. More specifically, the power regulator 100 does not monitor the actual value of the output voltage VOUT/rather; the output voltage VOUT is always attenuated to the same value as the reference voltage VREF.
Transient response behavior is a direct function of loop bandwidth. The higher the loop bandwidth, the faster the power regulator 100 will respond to load changes and output voltage deviation is reduced. Lower loop bandwidth degrades transient response as shown by the graphs 200 and 300. The low loop bandwidth may require a user of the power regulator 100 to add more output capacitance to reduce the swing of the output voltage VOUT. In other situations, the low loop bandwidth may require changing the value of the compensation components to restore the loop bandwidth to its optimum value. In many power regulators, the compensation components are internal and fixed, so the user has no access to them.
The voltage input 402 is coupled to a power stage 410. The power stage 410 generates a drive signal into an inductor L2. In the example of
The voltage output 403 is coupled to a voltage divider 416 consisting of two resistors R5 and R6. The voltage divider 416 in the example power regulator 400 is set to a fixed value. More specifically, neither the resistor R5 nor the resistor R6 are variable resistors. The output of the voltage divider 416 is a node N2, which is coupled to the inverting input of an error amplifier 420. In the example of
In the example power regulator 400, the error amplifier 420 is substantially similar or identical to the error amplifier 120 of
The non-inverting input of the error amplifier 420 is coupled to a resistor R7 and a resistor R8 wherein the resistor R8 is a variable resistor. The resistor R8 is coupled to ground and the resistor R7 is coupled to a reference voltage VREF. Unlike the conventional error amplifiers, the voltage VSET presented to the non-inverting input of the error amplifier 420 is not fixed. The voltage VSET is set by the user to set the output voltage VOUT. In the example power regulator 400, the voltage VSET is derived from a voltage divider that includes the reference voltage VREF. In the embodiment of
When using peak-current mode control, the minimum PWM pulse width that can be generated by the power stage 410 is determined by how fast a valid sample of the current through the inductor L2 can be obtained during the time that the high side FET Q1 is on. When the high side FET Q1 turns on, it creates a large amount of noise in the power stage 410 and the power regulator 400,
The minimum pulse width sets the maximum VIN to VOUT step-down ratio that can be achieved at a given switching frequency. This yields the minimum output voltage VOUT (min) as a function of the minimum pulse width PW(min) and switching frequency Fsw given by equation (1) as follows:
V
OUT(min)=VIN*PW(min)*Fsw Equation (1)
In one example, the minimum pulse width is 100 ns, the input voltage VIN is 12V and the switching frequency Fsw is 1 MHz. In this example, the minimum output voltage is 1.2V. In order to provide a higher input voltage VIN or a lower output voltage VOUT, the switching frequency Fsw must be lowered. If the power regulator 400 is operated beyond the minimum pulse width, pulses will typically be skipped, which lowers the switching frequency, which increases ripple and causes other anomalies.
In some examples of the power regulator 400, when current mode control is used as part of the regulation method, slope compensation is provided to prevent sub-harmonic oscillations of the output voltage under certain VIN and VOUT conditions. A slope compensation ramp voltage VRAMP (described below) is summed with the inductor current sense signal and is applied to one input of a comparator, the other input to the comparator is the output of the error amplifier 420. If valley-current mode is implemented as part of the regulation method, when the falling summed VRAMP and the current sense signal crosses the signal output by the error amplifier 420 signal, the comparator fires and sets a latch. The firing of the latch starts the PWM pulse. The latch is reset on the next system clock, such as the rising edge of a clock, providing the switching frequency Fsw. The clock signal terminates the PWM pulse. This produces leading-edge modulation. The PWM pulse may be generated in the controller 500 and drives the gate of the high side FET Q1 and an inverted PWM pulse drives the gate of the low side FET Q2.
If peak-current mode is implemented as part of the regulation method, the PWM signal begins when the system clock sets a PWM latch. When the rising edge of the summed voltage VRAMP and the current sense signal crosses the signal output of the error amplifier, the comparator fires and resets the latch, terminating the PWM pulse. This produces trailing-edge modulation.
Many slope compensation ramp functions are static and cannot accommodate for changes in the power regulator operating conditions. These ramp functions do not provide the optimum slope compensation waveforms. The circuits and methods described herein overcome the above-described problems by generating an adaptive slope compensation ramp that has an amplitude that varies as the input voltage VIN, the output voltage VOUT, or the switching frequency Fsw varies. For peak current mode systems, the ideal slope compensation ramp obeys equation 2 as follows:
Se=V
OUT
*Ri/L Equation (2)
where Ri is the current sense gain in volts/amp, and L is the inductance value of the inductor L2. For valley current mode the ideal slope follows equation 3 as follows:
Se=(VIN−VOUT)*Ri/L Equation (3)
In both cases, the value of the output voltage VOUT is required in order to generate the optimum compensation ramp slope. The power regulator 400 provides the output voltage VOUT with the feedback signal VFB at the node N2.
The first input 602 is coupled to a resistor R61 that is coupled to a resistor R62 at a node N61. The resistors R61 and R62 may divide the input voltage VIN down so that the voltage at the node N61 is one fifth the input voltage VIN. The second input 604 is coupled to a resistor R63 that is coupled to a resistor R64 at a node N62. The feedback voltage VFB in the examples described herein is half the output voltage VOUT. The resistors R63 and R62 divide the feedback voltage down to where the voltage at the node N62 is one fifth the output voltage VOUT. Accordingly, the voltage at the node N61 is the same proportion of the input voltage VIN as the voltage at the node N62 is to the output voltage VOUT.
The circuit 600 includes a voltage controlled current source U61 that has a non-inverting input and an inverting input. The non-inverting input is coupled to the node N61 and the inverting input is coupled to the node N62. The net effect of these connections is to produce a signal that is proportional to (VIN−VOUT). The current source U61 provides current to charge a ramp capacitor CRAMP. The gain of the current source U61 may be adjusted to account for the values of Ri and L. The ideal gain of the current source U61 is (5*CRAMP*Ri)/L based on the inputs to the power stage being one fifth of the input voltage VIN and the output voltage VOUT. In one example, CRAMP is 10 pF, Ri is 40 mV/A and L is 0.4 uH, then the gain of the current source U1 is set to 5 uS. The switch SW61 discharges the capacitor CRAMP at the beginning of each switching period with a narrow pulse by way of the coupling of the switch SW61 to the clock CLK operating at the switching frequency Fsw.
The voltage across the ramp capacitor CRAMP is referred to as the slope compensation ramp voltage VSLP. The peak value of the slope compensation ramp voltage VPR is captured and held by means of a switch SW62 and a capacitor C61. The switch SW62 is controlled by a pulse SMP that is generated just before the clock pulse CLK discharges the ramp capacitor CRAMP. A differential buffer U62 subtracts the slope compensation ramp voltage VSLP from the peak value of the slope compensation ramp voltage VPR and outputs the above-described ramp voltage VRAMP. The ramp voltage VRAMP is the downward sloping compensation ramp that valley mode control uses to switch the FETs Q1 and Q2 of
When the adaptive slope compensation of the circuit 600 is implemented the transient response is uniform as the input voltage VIN is changed over a wide range, such as a 3:1 range. The gain and phase of the power regulator 400 do not vary with changes in the input voltage VIN. When the benefits of this adaptive slope compensation circuit are combined with the benefits of the revised error amplifier topology described above, the loop bandwidth of the power regulator 400 does not change with variations in input voltage VIN or output voltage VOUT. This stabilization of the loop bandwidth eliminates the need for custom compensation for each different output voltage VOUT. With this solution, one value of inductor Li can be used over a wide input voltage VTN and output voltage VOUT range. Another advantage of transient response of the circuit 400 is a reduction in the amount of output capacitance required to meet a particular transient requirements, which reduces overall size and cost of the power regulator 400, especially when it is fabricated as a power module. Furthermore, the circuit 600 enables very narrow PWM pulse widths, such as down to approximately 20 ns. This capability can be used to create high VTN/VOUT step-down ratios, and/or operation at higher switching frequencies Fsw. Higher frequency operation enables higher loop bandwidth, which improves transient performance, and reduces the size of the power regulator 400.
While some examples of power regulators have been described in detail herein, it is to be understood that the inventive concepts may be otherwise variously embodied and employed and that the appended claims are intended to be construed to include such variations except insofar as limited by the prior art.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/113,204, filed Feb. 6, 2015, entitled POWER CONVERSION SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE OPTIMIZED FOR POWER MODULES, naming Joseph G. Renauer and Joel N. Brassfield as inventors, which is hereby fully incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62113204 | Feb 2015 | US |