This invention relates to a mobile communication network, and in particular to methods and systems whereby a cellular basestation can set its downlink transmission power.
It is known to establish femtocell access points in a building, in order to provide improved coverage for users of a cellular communication network, amongst other advantages. When a registered user device is within the coverage area of a femtocell access point, it can establish a connection with that access point, with the connection from the access point into the core network of the cellular network being established over a pre-existing broadband internet connection, for example. When the user leaves the coverage area of the femtocell access point, the connection can be handed over to a macrocell base station of the cellular network.
It is also known to establish a network of such femtocell access points.
One issue that arises with all cellular communications networks is that it is necessary for each basestation to transmit its downlink signals at a power that is sufficiently high to ensure that signals can be received over the whole of the intended coverage area. However, simply transmitting signals at the highest possible power is inefficient, and also risks causing interference. For example, there are only a limited number of scrambling codes, which must be shared between the basestations of the network. If all of the basestations are transmitting at their highest possible power, a user equipment would probably be able to detect signals from more than one basestation using the same scrambling code, and hence would be unable to distinguish between the transmissions from those basestations.
In the case of femtocell access points, each is responsible for setting its own downlink power, in a way that attempts to ensure adequate signal strength across its coverage area, while also achieving acceptable efficiency and levels of interference with other basestations. Where there is a network of femtocell access points, for example within a single building or otherwise within a relatively small area, each needs to set its downlink power such that there is acceptable signal quality over the whole of the intended coverage area.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of setting a downlink power for transmissions from a basestation of a cellular communications network, the cellular communications network comprising a group of such basestations, the method comprising:
Setting the downlink power in this way has the advantage that signals from the basestation should be able to be received satisfactorily across the intended coverage area.
According to other aspects of the invention, there are provided basestations and networks of such basestations that operate in accordance with the method of the first aspect.
Thus, in some embodiments, the downlink power of the basestation is set by setting a target value for the signal strength with which its transmissions should be receivable, and combining this with a value for the pathloss at the edge of an area at which the transmissions should be receivable. In embodiments of the invention, the value for the pathloss is set on the basis of measured values of the pathloss between basestations of the group. Setting the downlink power on this basis means that the transmissions from the basestation will in many cases be receivable at neighbouring basestations, thereby ensuring good overlap between the coverage areas of the basestation.
For a better understanding of the present invention, and to show how it may be put into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which:—
However, it is known that cellular coverage within buildings can be poor, leading to unavailability of service, or forcing user devices to transmit signals at high transmit powers, leading to shorter battery life.
Femtocell access points are therefore deployed within the building 10, with the intention that user devices located within the building at least should be able to obtain a cellular service by establishing a connection into the cellular network through one of the femtocell access points.
Although the invention is described herein with reference to the deployment of femtocell access points within a building, within which users are expected to circulate, such as an office building, an educational establishment, or a shopping mall, it will be apparent that the invention is applicable to other situations. For example, the invention is equally applicable to outdoor deployment of femtocell access points, especially but not exclusively in locations where there is common ownership and/or management of an area in which users are expected to circulate.
The femtocell access points 18 are located in suitable positions. For example, it may be appropriate to provide a femtocell access point close to the or each entrance/exit point, so that users entering or leaving the building can spend as long as possible connected to one of the femtocell access points. In addition, the femtocell access points should be distributed throughout the space, so that any user within the space will be able to establish a connection with one of the femtocell access points.
In one embodiment of the invention, the management node 26 distributes to all femtocell access points 18 in the group the relevant information about the group, including: the IDs of all femtocell access points in the group; and their main RF parameters, such as the UTRA Absolute RF Channel Number (UARFCN) and scrambling code (SC), the Location Area Code (LAC) and Cell-ID, and the initial power levels. However, it should also be noted that the femtocell access points in the group are able to communicate directly with each other on a peer-to-peer basis.
Thus, the invention is described herein with reference to its use in an access point operating in accordance with existing cellular standards set by 3GPP. However, it will be appreciated that the same techniques can be used in networks using all existing and future networks in which the initial downlink power of an access point or basestation can be set based on information available at the time.
In this embodiment, the femtocell access point can enter the downlink monitor mode, in which it can detect signals transmitted by other femtocell access points, to capture the identities of the neighbouring femtocell access points. Thus, by matching the detected UARFCN/SC and LAC/Cell-ID transmitted by each femtocell access point with the information received from the management node 26, the femtocell access point 18 is able to populate automatically the neighbour table. This can then be used in the case of handovers for local mobility. Thus, mobility within the group is fully supported. Cell-reselection with other femtocell access points is achieved by each broadcasting the relevant carrier and scrambling code information. Handover from one femtocell access point to another can be achieved because each femtocell access point has a full map of its neighbour femtocell access points, including their IDs, and so it can send a handover command that is unequivocally pointing to a specific femtocell access point. Full support is provided for circuit-switched (CS), packet-switched (PS) and multiple Radio Access Bearer (Multi-RAB) call mobility, and for intra-frequency and inter-frequency handovers between femtocell access points.
In addition, each femtocell access point receives periodic measurement reports from its connected user equipments, with these reports indicating the signal strengths of intra-frequency neighbouring femtocell access points. Further, each femtocell access point sends measurement control messages to its connected user equipments that are operating in compressed mode, requiring them to provide periodic measurements of their inter-frequency neighbouring femtocell access points.
Further, each femtocell access point is able to communicate with the other femtocell access points by means of the local area network to which they are connected.
The procedure for setting the uplink power is not relevant for an understanding of the present invention, and is not described further herein.
The network of femtocell access points within an enterprise, as shown in
In
In addition, the femtocell access point notes the data contained in the current Master Relationship Table (MRT).
The Master Relationship Table includes the following information about each femtocell access point in the group, namely: the unique Cell ID of the femtocell access point; the Group ID of the femtocell access point; the frequency and Primary Scrambling Code selected by the femtocell access point; the Cell ID, Primary Scrambling Code, UARFCN, CPICH Tx power adjustment and CPICH Tx power of other femtocell access points and Macro Layer nodeBs detected by that femtocell access point; and strongest detected cell information.
Whenever a femtocell access point powers up for the first time it broadcasts a message to indicate that it now part of the network. A random femtocell access point then sends it a copy of the MRT so that it can start its automatic configuration.
New femtocell access points are always added into the MRT with a particular time stamp (known as the creation time stamp). The priority of the femtocell access point is sometimes determined by the value of the time stamp, as described below.
Whenever a femtocell access point changes its configuration (either chooses a new frequency and/or scrambling code, or updates the Mobility Table) it will rebroadcast the MRT over the local area network with these changes. In addition, the management system may remove femtocell access points from the MRT if they appear to be inactive.
In step 42, the femtocell access point calculates a target value for the Received Signal Code Power (RSCP) at the edge of the cell that it is serving. This calculation is described in more detail below.
In step 44, the femtocell access point calculates a target value for the coverage pathloss to that same edge of the cell. Again, this calculation is described in more detail below.
The strength of a signal at a point is determined by the power with which the signal was transmitted and the pathloss between the transmitter and that point. Therefore, a desired value for the transmit power can be obtained by combining (a) the strength with which the signal is intended to be received at a point and (b) the pathloss between the transmitter and that point. Thus, in step 46, the femtocell access point combines the results obtained in steps 42 and 44 with some additional information to obtain a target value for the downlink power.
Specifically, the target value for the downlink power (Target DL Power) is calculated as:
where:
Target AP RSCP is the target value for the RSCP calculated in step 42.
Target coverage pathloss is the target value for the coverage pathloss calculated in step 44.
Loading Margin is a parameter set in the management node 26 and notified to the femtocell access point. The parameter value might be in the range form −5 dB to 5 dB with a 1 dB resolution, and a default value of 0 dB. This provides a margin to ensure that the desired signal strength is achieved.
% power allocated to CPICH is a parameter set in the management node 26 and notified to the femtocell access point. This reflects the fact that the RSCP measurements are made on the CPICH signal, but the total transmit power takes account of the signals transmitted on the CPICH and other channels.
Thus, the target value for the downlink power is determined such that the femtocell access point can achieve the target RSCP at the edge of the cell, given the target pathloss and the other system parameters.
In step 48, the value that is actually set for the downlink power is determined, based on the target value calculated in step 46. Specifically, the target value for the downlink power is compared with the minimum allowed downlink power (which is set in a parameter notified to the femtocell access point by the management system), and the higher of these two values is compared with the maximum allowed downlink power (which is set in another parameter notified to the femtocell access point by the management system), and the actual downlink power is taken to be the lower of the two values in this second comparison. Thus, provided that the target value for the downlink power is between the maximum and minimum allowed power values, this target value is set as the actual power value. If the target value for the downlink power is above the maximum allowed power value or below the minimum allowed power value, the appropriate one of these threshold values is set as the actual power value.
It should be noted that the management system can specify different power range parameters for operation on a carrier that is in use by macro layer basestations, and for operation on a carrier that is not in use by macro layer basestations, and the femtocell access point should set its downlink power based on whether or not it is operating on a carrier that is in use by macro layer basestations.
When the downlink power has been calculated and applied, the calculation can be performed again in the event of any data update, as shown at step 50. For example, the procedure can run again, whenever a new femtocell access point is added to the enterprise network, or whenever a femtocell access point is removed from the network, or whenever the femtocell access point detects signals for the first time from another femtocell access point, or an updated MRT indicates that another femtocell access point has detected signals for the first time from the first femtocell access point.
In step 60, the femtocell access point notes the data received in the latest MRT, and the information that it has received by monitoring the signals transmitted from other basestations in the cellular network.
The process involves categorizing the other femtocell access points in the group, in order to assess their closeness as neighbours. Based on the information received in step 60, the femtocell access point is able to divide the other femtocell access points in the group into tiers. The tier of a neighbour femtocell access point (or Macro Layer Neighbour) indicates the number of steps through which the femtocell access point has become aware of the neighbour.
Thus, a Tier 1 neighbour may be one which the femtocell access point has itself detected in its Downlink Monitor Mode. Alternatively, the neighbour may have detected the first femtocell access point in its own Downlink Monitor Mode, and the first femtocell access point may have become aware of this through the Master Relationship Table and reciprocated the relationship.
A Tier 2 neighbour is one which the femtocell access point has become aware of through a Tier 1 neighbour. Knowledge of the Tier 2 neighbour may be obtained from SIB (System Information Block) 11 of a Tier 1 femtocell access point or from a Macro Layer Neighbour. Alternatively, knowledge of the Tier 2 neighbour may be obtained by looking up the Master Relationship Table entry of a Tier 1 neighbour.
A Tier 3 neighbour is one which the femtocell access point has become aware of by looking up the Master Relationship Table entry of a Tier 2 neighbour. Depending on the size of the network, lower Tier neighbours might also exist, with the femtocell access point becoming aware of them through looking up the Master Relationship Table entry of a neighbour in the previous tier.
In step 62, the femtocell access point filters out from the received data all information that does not relate to the carrier on which it is operating.
In step 64, the femtocell access point determines whether the carrier on which it is operating should be regarded as a macro layer carrier. An access point is considered to be operating on a macro carrier if one or more of the following is true: either the access point is able to detect a primary scrambling code (PSC) of a macro layer basestation on its own carrier frequency when operating in its Downlink Monitor Mode;
or the access point extracts a primary scrambling code (PSC) of one or more macro layer basestation on its own carrier frequency from System Information Block (SIB) 11 of a macro layer basestation on a different carrier frequency that it detected when operating in its Downlink Monitor Mode;
or the access point extracts a primary scrambling code (PSC) of one or more macro layer basestation on its own carrier frequency from System Information Block (SIB) 11 of another femtocell access point, either on its own or a different carrier frequency, that it detected when operating in its Downlink Monitor Mode;
or the MRT contains entries for the primary scrambling code (PSC) of one or more macro layer basestation on the carrier frequency that the first femtocell access point is operating on.
If it is determined that the carrier frequency on which the femtocell access point is operating is not a macro layer carrier, the process passes to step 66, in which the target RSCP of the femtocell access point is set to a predetermined level, which is the minimum RSCP set by the management system. The value of this parameter might be set in the range from −50 dBm to −120 dBm with a 1 dB resolution, and the default value might be −100 dBm.
If it is determined in step 64 that the carrier frequency on which the femtocell access point is operating is a macro layer carrier, the process passes to step 68, in which the manner by which the carrier was determined to be a macro layer carrier is considered.
In step 68, it is determined whether the carrier was determined to be a macro layer carrier on the basis of information received by the femtocell access point in its Downlink Monitor Mode, or on the basis of information received from a Tier 1 neighbour. If so, the process passes to step 70.
In step 70, the femtocell access point calculates, for each of the primary scrambling codes that can be detected either by the femtocell access point or by one of its Tier 1 neighbours, the average RSCP. Thus, for each PSC, there may be multiple RSCP measurements, made in the femtocell access point performing the calculation and/or reported from neighbours of that femtocell access point, and the average RSCP is the average of these RSCP measurements. In carrying out this calculation, the femtocell access point uses only the measurements made by the femtocell access point itself and by the Tier 1 neighbours. Also, when calculating the average RSCP, linear averaging is used. That is, dB values are converted to linear values, then averaged and finally converted back to dB.
In step 72, the femtocell access point considers the average RSCP values obtained in step 70, and takes the largest of them. If this largest average value is larger than the predetermined minimum RSCP level mentioned above, then this largest average value is set as the target RSCP. This has the effect that transmissions from the femtocell access point will then typically be received at signal levels that are at least somewhat higher than signals from the surrounding macro layer cells. If it is not larger than the predetermined minimum RSCP level, the predetermined minimum RSCP level is set as the target RSCP.
If it is determined in step 68 that the carrier was not determined to be a macro layer carrier on the basis of information received by the femtocell access point in its Downlink Monitor Mode, or on the basis of information received from a Tier 1 neighbour (that is, it was determined to be a macro layer carrier on the basis of information measured by a higher Tier neighbour or from the MRT), the process passes to step 74.
In step 74, it is determined whether the carrier was determined to be a macro layer carrier on the basis of a measurement by a Tier 2 (or higher) neighbour. If it was not (that is, it was determined to be a macro layer carrier on the basis of information contained in the MRT), the process passes to step 66, in which the target RSCP of the femtocell access point is set to the minimum RSCP set by the management system, as described above.
If it is determined in step 74 that the carrier was determined to be a macro layer carrier on the basis of a measurement by a Tier 2 (or higher, i.e. Tier 1) neighbour, the process passes to step 76.
In step 76, the femtocell access point calculates, for each of the primary scrambling codes that can be detected either by the femtocell access point or by one of its Tier 2 (or higher Tier) neighbours, the average RSCP. Thus, for each PSC, there may be multiple RSCP measurements, made in the femtocell access point performing the calculation and/or reported from neighbours of that femtocell access point, and the average RSCP is the average of these RSCP measurements. In carrying out this calculation, the femtocell access point uses only the measurements made by the femtocell access point itself and by the Tier 2 (or higher Tier) neighbours. As before, when calculating the average RSCP, linear averaging is used. That is, dB values are converted to linear values, then averaged and finally converted back to dB.
In step 78, the femtocell access point considers the average RSCP values obtained in step 76, and takes the largest of them. If this largest average value is larger than the predetermined minimum RSCP level mentioned above, then this largest average value is set as the target RSCP. If it is not larger than the predetermined minimum RSCP level, the predetermined minimum RSCP level is set as the target RSCP.
In step 90, the femtocell access point notes the data received in the latest MRT, and the information that it has received by monitoring the signals transmitted from other basestations in the cellular network.
In step 92, the femtocell access point determines whether there are any other femtocell access points in the group managed by the relevant enterprise. It can be deduced from the MRT and other information relayed from the management node 28 whether there are any other femtocell access points in operation in the same group.
If it is determined in step 92 that there are no other femtocell access points in operation in the same group, the process passes to step 94, in which the target coverage pathloss is set to a predetermined value, set by the management system, that acts as the minimum pathloss value.
If it is determined in step 92 that there is at least one other femtocell access point in operation in the same group, the process passes to step 96, in which it is determined whether the femtocell access point itself has detected signals from any neighbouring femtocell access point. If not, the process passes to step 98.
In step 98, it is determined from the MRT whether any neighbouring femtocell access point of the first femtocell access point itself has detected signals from that first femtocell access point. If no neighbour has detected the access point performing the procedure, the process passes to step 100, in which again the target coverage pathloss is set to the predetermined minimum pathloss value.
If it is determined in step 98 that a neighbouring femtocell access point of the first femtocell access point itself has detected signals from the first femtocell access point, the process passes to step 102, and if it is determined in step 96 that the first femtocell access point has detected signals from a neighbouring femtocell access point, the process passes to step 104.
Thus, steps 102 and 104 are reached when the number of active femtocell access points has reached a certain density, specifically such that the femtocell access point performing the procedure is relatively close to at least one other femtocell access point in the group.
In both steps 102 and 104, the target coverage pathloss is set to a value that is higher than the minimum value set in steps 94 and 100. Specifically, in steps 102 and 104, the femtocell access point determines the pathlosses between all Tier 1 neighbour pairs of femtocell access points across the enterprise group. In each case, the power of the signals transmitted from each femtocell access point is known to the femtocell access point performing the calculation, as it will appear in the MRT. Each femtocell access point can also determine the RSCP with which it detects the signals transmitted from its Tier 1 neighbour femtocell access points. This information is distributed to other femtocell access points via the MRT. Based on this, the femtocell access point performing the calculation is able to determine the pathlosses between pairs of Tier 1 neighbour femtocell access points across the whole enterprise group.
The femtocell access point performing the calculation is then able to rank these pathlosses in order of their magnitude, and, in this embodiment, selects a value that is equal to the 95th percentile of the pathlosses (that is, the value that 95% of the values are below), and then sets the target coverage pathloss to be equal to this selected value. It will be appreciated that although the value equal to the 95th percentile is selected in this embodiment, this is based on a parameter that can be set by the management system, which could therefore require that the value equal to the 80th, 90th, 98th or any other percentile be chosen. However, in order to ensure that the downlink power is set high enough to ensure good overlap between the coverage areas of the femtocell access points, the target pathloss value should be set higher than a majority of calculated pathloss values, for example higher than at least 75% of calculated pathloss values.
Thus, the femtocell access point sets an assumed value for the pathlosses for its transmissions that is based on actual pathloss values that are found to exist in the network (although it sets this assumed value to be higher than the majority of the actual pathloss values that are found to exist). Therefore, for example in cases where relatively high pathlosses are found to exist (for example because the femtocell access points of the group are somewhat widely spaced apart, or because the femtocell access points are distributed through a space that contains a large number of walls that reduce signal strength), the target pathloss value will be set relatively high, and each new femtocell access point will set its initial downlink power to a relatively high value.
There is thus disclosed a system that allows each femtocell access point to set its own downlink power based on the conditions that exist in the network, allowing good coverage to be achieved, without causing unnecessary interference.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0914026.0 | Aug 2009 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation that claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/820,995, filed on Jun. 22, 2010, and entitled “POWER SETTING”, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,463,281, which in turn claims priority to GB 0914026.0, filed Aug. 11, 2009, and entitled “POWER SETTING”. Both of these prior applications are hereby incorporated by reference and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5546443 | Raith | Aug 1996 | A |
5548806 | Yamaguchi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5604730 | Tiedemann, Jr. | Feb 1997 | A |
5625672 | Yamada | Apr 1997 | A |
5666655 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5883884 | Atkinson | Mar 1999 | A |
6078821 | Kaschke et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085106 | Sendonaris et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6301478 | Wallstedt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314294 | Benveniste | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6405048 | Haartsen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438379 | Gitlin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6493331 | Walton et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6553235 | Bark | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6799044 | Wesby et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6957087 | Hedberg | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6990348 | Benveniste | Jan 2006 | B1 |
8032142 | Carter et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8463281 | Maida et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8731598 | Carter et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8798545 | Carter | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812047 | Carter et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020077138 | Bark et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082023 | Bark | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020119796 | Vanghi | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030109284 | Akerberg | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030133409 | Corazza | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040192279 | Backes et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224692 | Hamabe | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236547 | Rappaport et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050003846 | Anderson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050180351 | Peric | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050265288 | Liu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060019665 | Aghvami et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025136 | Fujita et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060084427 | Kurose | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060183495 | Solimon | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060223546 | Claussen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060281412 | Skafidas et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070042799 | Jubin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076650 | Manjeshwar et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070077929 | Chen | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082619 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097939 | Nylander et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070099633 | Bamberger et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070104085 | Sambhwani et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070225029 | Abusch-Magder | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070293260 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080037439 | Cave et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039129 | Li et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080146154 | Claussen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151840 | Baker et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080153497 | Kalhan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080188260 | Xiao et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188265 | Carter et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090042596 | Yavuz et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052403 | Hokao | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090129291 | Gupta | May 2009 | A1 |
20090233616 | Kwon et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090316585 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100035647 | Gholmieh et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100124930 | Andrews et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100182984 | Herscovici et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110009065 | Carter | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110039570 | Maida et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110177838 | Olsew | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120046055 | Carter et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130165175 | Carter et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165176 | Carter et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1264992 | Aug 2000 | CN |
1567743 | Jan 2005 | CN |
1906868 | Jan 2007 | CN |
101141184 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101237395 | Aug 2008 | CN |
0717508 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0817400 | Jan 1998 | EP |
08651723 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0936753 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0973353 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1069702 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1189369 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1343336 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 414 257 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1657950 | May 2006 | EP |
1 694 091 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1780904 | May 2007 | EP |
1796291 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1895714 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1 912 345 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1912345 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1912458 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1887709 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2095531 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2239875 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2 260 879 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2318483 | Apr 1998 | GB |
2 359 452 | Aug 2001 | GB |
2370729 | Jul 2002 | GB |
2378089 | Jan 2003 | GB |
2390953 | Jan 2004 | GB |
2 412 541 | Sep 2005 | GB |
2 428 937 | Feb 2007 | GB |
2443865 | May 2008 | GB |
2 448 367 | Oct 2008 | GB |
2 450 123 | Dec 2008 | GB |
2481331 | Mar 2012 | GB |
2481544 | Mar 2012 | GB |
2481545 | Mar 2012 | GB |
2002218528 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003219478 | Jul 2003 | JP |
A 2004266781 | Sep 2004 | JP |
A 2006135673 | May 2006 | JP |
A 2006222560 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006527943 | Dec 2006 | JP |
WO 9509513 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9595513 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9631075 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9711567 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9809465 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9859435 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9900914 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9934531 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 0108322 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0152580 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0178327 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 02054604 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 03096570 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03101134 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2005046259 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069519 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2006010958 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006083152 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006107555 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007015066 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007040453 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007044281 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007051189 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2008082587 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008093100 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009023587 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/214,084. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/214,084. |
EP Search Report dated Nov. 28, 2013 for EP Application No. 13179530.4. |
EP Search Report dated Nov. 27, 2013 for EP Application No. 13179529.6. |
EP Search Report dated Nov. 27, 2013 for EP Application No. 13179527.0. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 31, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,337. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,337. |
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/822,354. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2012. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,995. |
UK Search Report dated Jun. 11, 2007, for related GB Application No. 0702094.4. |
UK Intellectual Property Office Examination Report dated Dec. 13, 2010 issued in GB0702094.4. |
U.K. Search Report dated Nov. 27, 2007 for U.K. Patent Application No. GB0702094.4, Access Point Power Control, 3 pages. |
U.K. Search Report dated Nov. 30, 2007 for U.K. Patent Application No. GB0702094.4, Access Point Power Control, 3 pages. |
U.K. Search Report dated Dec. 4, 2007 for U.K. Patent Application No. GB0702094.4, Access Point Power Control, 3 pages. |
International Search Report dated Jun. 19, 2008 from corresponding International Application No. PCT/GB2008/000339. |
International Search Report dated Nov. 28, 2008 from corresponding International Application No. PCT/GB2008/000339. |
UK Intellectual Property Office Examination Report dated Dec. 13, 2010, issued in GB0702094.4. |
Combined Search and Examination Report dated Oct. 26, 2011, GB Application No. GB1115805.2. |
Combined Search and Examination Report dated Oct. 26, 2011, GB Application No. GB1115809.4. |
Combined Search and Examination Report dated Oct. 26, 2011, GB Application No. GB1115813.6. |
EP Examination Report dated Dec. 20, 2011, GB Application No. GB1115805.2. |
EP Examination Report dated Dec. 20, 2011, GB Application No. GB1115809.4. |
EP Examination Report dated Dec. 20, 2011, GB Application No. GB1115813.6. |
JP First Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2012, JP Application No. 2009-547759. |
UK Intellectual Property Office Search Report dated Aug. 20, 2009 issued in GB09117741.4. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 6, 2010 issued in Application No. PCT/GB2010/050695. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 31, 2010 issued in PCT/GB2010/050680. |
UK Intellectual Property Office Search Report dated Nov. 11, 2009 issued in GB0914026.0. |
UK Combined Search and Examination Report dated Apr. 4, 2012, Application No. GB1203240.5. |
EP Second Examination Report dated Nov. 26, 2012, Application No. 10 720 945.4-1246. |
Final Office Action dated May 1, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/822,354. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 27, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/822,354. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 28, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,995. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 21, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,995. |
CN Office Action dated May 3, 2012 for CN Application No. 200880010581.X. |
CN Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2013 for CN Application No. 200880010581.X. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 4, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/214,084. |
Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,063. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,063. |
Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,263. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 25, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,263. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 12, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/822,354. |
CN Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2014 for CN Application No. 201080030604.0. |
CN Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2014 for CN Application No. 201080035865.1. |
EP Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2011 for EP Application No. 08702006.1. |
EP Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2013 for EP Application No. 08702006.1. |
EP Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2014 for EP Application No. 08702006.1. |
JP Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2014 for JP Application No. 2012-519058. |
JP Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2014 for JP Application No. 2012-524280. |
RU Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2013 for RU Application No. 2012108046/07. |
Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,063. |
Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/705,063. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140011489 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12820995 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13725665 | US |