The present invention relates to spring energized fastening tools. More precisely, the present invention relates to improvements to the spring and release of a spring-actuated stapling device.
Spring powered staplers and staple guns operate by driving a striker with a power spring. The striker ejects a staple by impact blow. In a desktop stapler, the staple is ejected into an anvil of a pivotally attached base. In a staple gun, the fastener is normally installed directly into a work surface. Two general principles are used in either type device. In the first design, the striker has an initial position in front of a staple track. The striker is lifted against the force of the power spring to a position above the staple track. The striker is released to impact and eject the staple. This design may be referred to as a “low start” stapler. A second design uses a “high start” position. That is, the striker has an initial position above the staples loaded on the staple feed track. The power spring is deflected while the striker does not move. At a predetermined position of the power spring deflection, the striker is released to accelerate into and eject a staple. A handle normally serves as an energy input device although motorized versions need not have a handle. Spring energized staple gun tackers have traditionally used a low start configuration although high start type tackers are known. Spring energized desktop staplers of both types are currently available.
In both high and low start types, the power spring can be made of wire or have a flat metal shape. The flat metal types are normally elongated along a length of the body. Wire springs may be horizontally elongated or vertically oriented compression style. Modern designs tend toward the elongated type, for example a torsion spring with extended arms.
A limitation of conventional designs is the absence of simplified structures to preload a torsion spring in a high start type. Further, an improvement is called for in providing a more compact lever arrangement to operate with the simplified wire spring.
In comparing a flat spring to a wire spring design, the length tolerance of an elongated flat spring is relatively precise, being limited mostly by the precision of the blank cut out for it, in the case that the spring is of reasonably straight bend. For a wire spring, however, the arm length may be less precise since it depends on the manner in which the coil is wound among other factors. It is therefore desirable to have a release mechanism that is less sensitive to spring length with a high start type wire spring.
The present invention is preferably directed to a high start type stapler, although the improvements in part or whole may be applied to a low start type or other fastening devices.
In one exemplary embodiment the present invention, vertically co-incident arms extend forward from at least one coil of a torsion spring. Preferably two co-axial coils provide a base for four forward extending wire arms, where some portions of these wires are at least nearly coincident with respect to a side view. Normally a majority of energy is stored in the spring by deflection of the coil of the torsion spring. However, the arms are at least partially resilient so that the arms also may store some useful energy as well. A first pair of arms extend from the coil to the striker. A second pair of arms normally press the first pair in a rest condition, while the second pair may be forcibly deflected away from first arm pair as the spring is energized. The preferred embodiment improved structures preload the torsion spring arms in the rest condition. In particular, the arms cross to directly press each other at least at one crossing location or a small bridge connects them.
In one preferred embodiment, the power spring is a single-piece, dual torsion spring. In a further embodiment, the two coils are from separate, adjacent, opposed torsion springs. The springs according to the aforementioned constructions have been shown to be more efficient than conventional power spring designs. Advantages of increased efficiency are one or a combination of reduced handle travel for a lower or smaller grip, added performance, and reduced handle force. It follows that a smaller force spring can be used for a constant performance. For example, a 10% increase in efficiency can allow about a 10% lower force spring for a given application. This has a virtuous benefit that any friction in the system is also reduced by 10% since friction is a direct proportion to the force at a friction area.
The separate springs may be best suited for higher force or energy applications such as staple guns or high capacity staplers. In the case of separate springs, there is a tendency for the coils to twist away from each other from forces at the front as explained later. The coils spread apart to undesirably press and scrape the inner housing walls if not otherwise retained together. According to the preferred embodiment, a flanged mandrel retains the coils together wherein sliding friction at the coil area is substantially eliminated. The mandrel may therefore be of a simple, single-molded piece.
A lever pivots near the front of the stapler body near a location of the striker. The lever presses the first pair of wire arms to deflect the arms downward, as the second pair of arms remains restrained by engagement to the striker. The lever presses the arms directly.
In a further feature of the invention, an improved release mechanism is disclosed. A prior release design is disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,708,179 (Marks), in FIGS. 21 to 23, and in another variation, U.S. Pat. No. 7,828,184 (Marks), both issued to the present inventor and both of which are incorporated herein by reference. In these designs, a power spring tip presses a latch to restrain the striker from moving as the spring is energized. At a pre-release position of the handle, a cam moves to allow the latch to pivot and free the striker to move downward. These designs include flat springs in the preferred embodiments, although wire springs can also be used and are contemplated.
In a preferred embodiment, a tab of the striker presses atop the latch. The power spring extends through both the striker and the latch, but is not restrained by the latch. A resulting advantage is the spring length, as defined by the position of the front tip, can vary without affecting the release action. By contrast, a latch engagement to the spring tip can be sensitive to the position of that tip. Further, a wire spring does not provide a well-defined flat release surface at its tip. In the preferred embodiment, the striker tab extends forward. Upon pressing the latch the tab creates a torque on the striker that biases the bottom of the striker forward. As discussed in detail later, when used with a dual thickness striker, this torque helps guide the striker in its motion.
These and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments which, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.
The present invention is directed to a spring energized fastening device. In a desktop stapler form seen in
In the power spring 90, the respective arms 95 and 96 include a free condition as shown in
The power spring 90 is preferably fabricated from spring steel that has been heat treated. One example of such steel is music wire. In a staple gun application, the wire is about 0.090-0.150″ diameter inclusive of all dimensions within the specified out limits, while in a standard office desktop stapler application, the wire is about 0.06 to 0.08″ diameter, inclusive of all dimensions within the specified outer limits. Other wire diameters or materials may be selected as required for specific applications; for example, a staple gun that is of heavier or lighter duty than provided by the stated wire types.
According to the above-described structure, power spring 90 maintains a preload without any additional components. The power spring 90 is thus restrained in its preloaded condition by folding against or crisscrossing itself. Specifically, the arms directly press each other at an arm preload location in a stable manner, such location being at a crossing of the arms.
In
As best seen in
Regarding the assembly,
Lever 40 presses the power spring 90 at fulcrum 41 of the lever near bend 91 of the power spring. This pressing point is between a location of striker 100 and post 12. According to the preferred embodiment of the invention, the lever 40 presses the power spring wire at a location substantially rearward of lever pivot point 42 (
The user presses on handle 30 to operate the stapler. Handle 30 includes cam area 31 that slides along rear end 44 of lever 40 (
Optional reset spring 130 normally biases the components upward in a reset stroke. In particular, reset spring 130 biases power spring 90 to move from the post-release position of
A second tensile link is shown in a preferred embodiment of
To provide a compact form in a preferred embodiment, power spring 90 has arms 95 and 96 extending from coil 98 at an angle where the arms become coincident in a rest condition (as seen from the side views of
In power spring 90, arms 95 extend past loop 94 to engage striker 100. In
In power spring 190 the opposed parts are proximate each other for preferably the full length of the spring. This provides a compact shape with respect to width. This may be useful when the stapling device is to be high energy, such as a staple gun or high capacity desktop stapler. For example, a staple gun using T-50 type staples or a desktop stapler of over 60-page capacity may be considered heavy-duty formats although such uses may include other formats. In a staple gun, the power spring should fit within a housing that is comfortable to grip; a desktop stapler should be reasonable size not to appear bulky.
In accordance with the above goals, one embodiment of inner arms 196 including ends 199 are spaced near to each other. With no loop at the end, the arms 196 at ends 199 can engage a striker or equivalent structure (not shown) through a small opening or openings of the striker. Outer arm 195 extends forward at an angle toward inner arm 196 in the side view of
The wire of power spring 190 is relatively thick. In one example staple gun application, the wire is about 0.125-0.130″ diameter, and inclusive of all dimensions in between the outer limits. So it is desirable to have the forward portions of the arms be very nearly coincident with respect to the side view, such as
Within bridge 200, outer arm 195 is biased to rise relative to inner arm 196. This can be seen by comparing the free position of
Without remedy, the coils 198 of compact power spring 190 tend to twist away from each other and may be unstable within a stapler housing (not shown). It will improve this twisting condition to include an optional mandrel 160 upon which coil 198 is guided (
Preferably, mandrel 160 is a discrete component so that it may be part of a power spring sub-assembly. The mandrel 160 is then pivotable upon a post of the housing to better allow for rotational motion of the power spring 190. Preferably, the mandrel is made from a low friction material such as acetal, nylon, polypropylene, PTFE, or similar. However, optionally, such a mandrel may be included as an element of or integral to housing 10 or other component.
A solution is to the skewing bias includes flange 162 on mandrel 160 (
It may be noted here that a torsion wire spring should operate to close the coil upon deflection. Alternatively, opening or unwinding the coil may energize the spring. However, this creates tensile stress on the inside of the coil wires and has inferior life properties so such applications are normally limited to low energy uses.
Alternatively to flanges 162, a wire or equivalent tensile tie may span arms 195 near to coil 198 to hold the arms together. The coils are then similarly held from spreading.
To deflect and assemble power spring 190 to bridge 200 to arrive at its rest condition of
Bridge 200 may include extension 201 (
Empirical testing has shown a tendency for bridge 200 to slide rearward upon the spring in use. Therefore, there should be an optional crimp or other inhibiting structure to prevent such motion. For example, bridge 200 may be crimped at 206 (
As with single spring 90 above, arms 195 near end 199 extend past bridge 200 in power spring 190. This exposed underside area of arms 195 provides a surface for an absorber (not shown) to stop the motion of the power spring 190 at the end of a firing stroke.
It has been described that power spring embodiment 190 is suited for staple guns or high capacity staplers. Naturally, the first embodiment single piece spring 90 may be scaled to serve in such devices if desired. Likewise the two-piece spring 190 may be used for a standard duty desktop stapler. Further, it may be desired that the opposed elements of either spring embodiment be not identically opposed if there is an advantage to fit a particular structure. For example, there may be extra or fewer bends on one side or the parts may be identical and not opposed, i.e. entirely identical.
In various alternative embodiments, it is also possible to use the power spring of the present invention as a single torsion spring. For example, in spring 90 loop 94 may terminate in a hook rather than a full loop (not shown). A single arm 95 corresponding to a single coil 98 could be moved to rest upon such hook. For spring 190, flanges 162 of the mandrel could provide useful guidance to a single coil to hold the coil from becoming skewed in a device.
An improved release mechanism or latch means for a high start type stapler is shown in
Striker 100 moves vertically in slot 11 of housing 10 in
The forward direction of tab 102 provides a particular advantage when used with a dual thickness striker as shown. As seen in
It is preferred that the striker 100 does not tilt rearward (clockwise in the drawings) as the power spring 90 is released. Otherwise the striker 100 may impact track 180 or a staple rearward of slot 11. One way to bias the striker 100 forward at the lower end is from the angle of power spring 90 at end 99. As seen in
However, optionally, to further ensure the striker is biased forward at its lower area, tab 102 provides an improvement. The distance between the opening 103 and tab 102 with respect to the length direction (horizontal in
In a wire type torsion, spring a position of a terminal end, such as end 99, will be less precise than for a flat metal type. The flat metal spring is approximately accurate within the tolerance of the punching operation that forms the flat shape. However, the coil winding process and arm angle tolerance in a wire spring means such springs have a wider arm length tolerance. So it is preferable to release from the striker as shown herein rather than from a tip of the spring as has been done before. Latch 200 extends downward adjacent to and in front of striker 100. So to allow for arm length variations, latch 200 includes openings 207, seen in
Although the present invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments that are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art are also within the scope of the invention. Components and features of one embodiment may be combined with other embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is intended to be defined only by reference to the appended claims. While variations have been described and shown, it is to be understood that these variations are merely exemplary of the present invention and are by no means meant to be limiting.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1655275 | La Place | Aug 1925 | A |
1919373 | Krantz | Feb 1931 | A |
2087242 | Bunnell | Jul 1937 | A |
2137642 | Cavanagh | Nov 1938 | A |
2326540 | Tovstenson | Aug 1943 | A |
2493640 | Peterson | Jan 1950 | A |
2726391 | Pilblad | Dec 1955 | A |
2755474 | Spencer | Jul 1956 | A |
2769174 | Libert | Nov 1956 | A |
2884636 | Abrams | May 1959 | A |
3103012 | Kohen et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
3610505 | Males et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3758016 | Olney et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3940044 | La Pointe | Feb 1976 | A |
3948426 | La Pointe | Apr 1976 | A |
4126260 | Mickelsson | Nov 1978 | A |
4367833 | Kenney | Jan 1983 | A |
4450998 | Ruskin | May 1984 | A |
4452388 | Fealey | Jun 1984 | A |
4463890 | Ruskin | Aug 1984 | A |
4629108 | Judge | Dec 1986 | A |
5328075 | Marks | Jul 1994 | A |
5335838 | Harris et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5335839 | Fealey | Aug 1994 | A |
5356063 | Perez | Oct 1994 | A |
5407118 | Marks | Apr 1995 | A |
5497932 | Brewer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5664722 | Marks | Sep 1997 | A |
5699949 | Marks | Dec 1997 | A |
5816470 | Plato et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5988478 | Marks | Nov 1999 | A |
6145728 | Marks | Nov 2000 | A |
6244491 | Kandasamy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6550661 | Aoki | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6626346 | Jairam et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6789719 | Shor | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6918525 | Marks | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6966479 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7097086 | Joyce et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097088 | Shor | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118019 | Marks | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121444 | Joyce | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124922 | Marks | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124924 | Marks | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140526 | Matsukawa | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7178709 | Marks | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7234621 | Marks | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243832 | Jiang | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7387227 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7395955 | Zins et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7464845 | Chou | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7513406 | Marks | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7540400 | Zins et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7681771 | Kandasamy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708179 | Marks | May 2010 | B2 |
7748589 | Marks | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7823759 | Jiang | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828184 | Marks | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7950558 | Marks | May 2011 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
255111 | Jun 1948 | CH |
2229129 | Sep 1990 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Engineering drawing (1 sheet attached) of applicant WorkTools' PaperPro Evo stapler offered for sale in the US in 2010, depicting internal power spring configuration. |
Worktools, Inc.; International Searching Authority; PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; May 10, 2013; 8pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130228607 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |