This patent document is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/829,250 filed on Jul. 1, 2010, which claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of European Patent Application No. 09164445.0 filed on Jul. 2, 2009, to which priority is also claimed here.
The invention relates to a power stage, i.e. a driving stage as part of a semiconductor device, particularly but not exclusively a high stage for operating at a voltage above the low voltage levels used for modern CMOS designs.
Typical modern complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) processes are designed to operate on relatively low voltage. For example, 65 nm CMOS processes typically use 1.2V.
However, electronic circuits may need to deal with significantly higher voltages than this. A particular example is the case of battery powered circuits. Lithium ion batteries have a nominal voltage of 3.6 V but in practice the battery voltage may vary between 2.1V and 5.5V, depending on the charge state. Such voltages are higher than the voltage levels tolerated in standard CMOS, also known as base-line CMOS, that is to say with no additional process options.
Moreover, there is an increasing desire for minaturisation and hence integration. To integrate complete systems or even part systems on a chip, there is a need to integrate higher voltage blocks with standard CMOS. This applies, for example, to circuits such as radio frequency receivers, power amplifiers, and dc-dc power converters which need to be supplied directly by the battery voltage in battery powered applications.
Some proposals for dealing with voltages higher than the breakdown voltage of the transistors of standard CMOS circuits have been made. In particular, cascode circuits have been proposed. Inoue, A et al “A high efficiency, high voltage, balanced cascode FET”, IEEE International Microwave Symposium, June 1995, describes such cascode circuits implemented using isolated MOS transistors, in particular triple-well isolated transistors.
An alternative approach is to use layout techniques such as the use of extended drain MOS transistors (EDMOS).
Unfortunately, although such techniques do allow higher voltages to be dealt with by CMOS circuits, they introduce an additional design issue of biasing. In particular, consider the case of driving a pair of high and low side output transistors arranged between a high battery voltage (Vbat) and a ground voltage (Vss). In this case, a buffer driving the high side output transistor needs to be arranged between the battery voltage Vbat and an intermediate bias voltage (Vbias), whereas a buffer driving the low side output transistor needs to be arranged between the intermediate bias voltage (Vbias) and the ground voltage (Vss). The bias voltage is needed in particular for biasing the substrate of the high side buffer.
This in turn creates a routing difficulty, in that the bias voltage needs to be routed. This routing difficulty is particularly acute in multiple stage buffers, in which a plurality of buffers in series are used to drive the output transistors, or cascode circuits.
According to the invention there is provided a driver circuit as disclosed herein.
In each buffer stage, a differential buffer is used for both the high side buffer and the low side buffer. In this way, the buffer is essentially self-biasing—there is no need to route a bias voltage to the intermediate transistors.
This gives a number of advantages. Firstly, routing is much easier since there is no need to route a bias voltage line. Secondly, the differential implementation delivers certain advantages, such as noise reduction. Thirdly, the differential implementation allows the use of smaller transistors which results in shorter and local connections, this in turn can reduce parasitics.
Further, it is to be noted that although at first sight the use of a differential buffer has the significant disadvantage of twice the number of transistors, the inventors have realised that since each of these transistors needs to carry only half the current, the transistors can have half the area of non-differential approaches and so in fact there is little or no area penalty.
For a better understanding of the invention embodiments will now be described, purely by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The drawings are schematic and not to scale. The same or corresponding components are given the same reference numbers in the different figures, and the description relating thereto is not necessarily repeated.
Referring to
An input stage 8 operates between a lower voltage Vdd and Vss and outputs a logic level signal. Typically, the lower voltage Vdd may be 1.2 V for conventional CMOS and the battery voltage Vbat may be 3.6 V, taking the ground voltage as 0V.
Each buffer stage includes a high side buffer 12 and a low side buffer 14, arranged in series between a high side line 16, here carrying a battery voltage Vbat, and a low side line 18, carrying a source or ground voltage Vss. The circuit used to implement the buffers 12, 14 is discussed below with reference to
A level shift circuit 20 converts the output of the input stage 8 to a higher level to input to the high side buffer 12 of the first buffer stage 4. A high-side inverter 22 drives the inverting input of the first buffer stage 4.
Similarly, on the low side the input stage drives the low side buffer 14 of the first buffer stage 4, driving the inverting input through a low side inverter 24.
The inverting outputs of the first buffer stage 4 drive the inverting inputs of the second buffer stage 6. The number of buffer stages may vary, but in the embodiment shown there are two buffer stages so the second buffer stage is also the last buffer stage.
The last buffer stage drives the output stage 2, which is a single differential output stage, in contrast to the buffer stages which include effectively two buffers, the high side buffer and the low side buffer.
Referring to
The high side buffer 12 has a first input 30 and a second input 32.
A first p-type transistor 50 is connected in series with a first n-type transistor 54, the p-type transistor being on the high side, with the node between the first p-type transistor 50 and the first n-type transistor 54 being the first output 40 of the high side buffer. The first input 30 is connected to the gates of both the first p-type transistor 50 and the first n-type transistor 54.
A second p-type transistor 52 and a second n-type transistor 56 are connected in series with each other and in parallel with the first p-type and n-type transistors, again with the p-type transistor 52 on the high side, with the node between the second p-type and n-type transistors 52, 56 being the second output 42 of the high side buffer 12. The second input 32 is connected to the gates of both the second p-type transistor 52 and the second n-type transistor 56.
These components form a differential high side buffer accepting a differential input on the first input 30 and second input 32 and outputting a differential output on the first output 40 and the second output 42.
The low side buffer 14 has a corresponding structure forming a differential buffer with a first input 34 and a second input 36. In particular, a third p-type transistor 60 is connected in series with a third n-type transistor 64, the third p-type transistor being on the high side, with the node between the third p-type transistor 60 and the third n-type transistor 64 being the first output 44 of the low side buffer. The first input 34 is connected to the gates of both the third p-type transistor 60 and the third n-type transistor 64.
A fourth p-type transistor 62 and a fourth n-type transistor 66 are connected in series with each other and in parallel with the third p-type and n-type transistors, again with the fourth p-type transistor 62 on the high side, with the node between the fourth p-type and n-type transistors 62, 66 being the second output 46 of the low side buffer 12.
The second input 36 is connected to the gates of both the fourth p-type transistor 62 and the fourth n-type transistor 66.
A bias line 38 connects the parallel parts of each of the circuits to each other. Importantly, because of the differential structure, this bias line 38 is self-biassing and is at an intermediate voltage between high side line 16 and low side line 18 without requiring an external bias.
The differential amplifier of the output stage 2 is implemented in the same way as the differential amplifiers in the high and low sides of the buffer stages.
A first p-type transistor 70 is connected in series with a first n-type transistor 74, the p-type transistor being on the high side, with the node between the first p-type transistor 70 and the first n-type transistor 74 being the first output 80 of the output stage. A second p-type transistor 72 and a second n-type transistor 76 are connected in series with each other and in parallel with the first p-type and n-type transistors, again with the p-type transistor 72 on the high side, with the node between the second p-type and n-type transistors 72, 76 being the second output 82 of the output stage 2. All the transistors in this embodiment are implemented using triple-well technology. The wells of the first and second p-type transistors are connected to the high side line 16, and the wells of the third and fourth n-type transistors are connected to the low side line 18. The wells of the remaining transistors, i.e. the first and second n-type transistors and the third and fourth p-type transistors, are connected to the bias line 38.
The fact that the use of the differential buffer structure shown avoids the need for a separate bias greatly eases circuit layout.
In the embodiment described, all the transistors are extended drain transistors (EDMOS) but other transistor types may also be used.
The outputs 80, 82 of the output stage 2 drive a transformer 106 through capacitive couplers 108.
Simulation of the output stage has been carried out and is illustrated in
Referring to
Each of the outputs 80,82 of output stage 2 are switched through respective inductors 114,116 and across capacitor 118 to drive node 120, which is connected to a load. The capacitor filters ac components. The regulated output voltage is available at the drive node.
In all of these examples, the power routing is much simplified and the required intermediate voltage levels are obtained without additional circuitry.
It should be emphasised that the embodiments shown are only examples and that those skilled in the art will be able to implement the invention in different ways. For example, the number of stages may vary as well as the detailed circuit implementation. Although the embodiment described above uses a triple-well CMOS process for all transistors, the isolation is in fact only required for the transistors in the high side buffers, and the transistors in the low side buffers can, if desired, be implemented in a different process.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09164445 | Jul 2009 | EP | regional |
This application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/661,275, filed on Oct. 26, 2012 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/829,250, filed on Jul. 1, 2010, now a granted patent U.S. 8,373,454 issued on Feb. 12, 2013, which claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of European Patent Application No. 09164445.0 filed on Jul. 2, 2009, to which priority is also claimed here.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3273033 | Rossmeisl | Sep 1966 | A |
4292595 | Smith | Sep 1981 | A |
4748419 | Somerville | May 1988 | A |
4896287 | O'Donnell et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5138436 | Koepf | Aug 1992 | A |
5187636 | Nakao | Feb 1993 | A |
5187637 | Embree | Feb 1993 | A |
5321597 | Alacoque | Jun 1994 | A |
5488588 | Engeler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
6014047 | Dreps et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6271131 | Uhlenbrock | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6331999 | Ducaroir | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347395 | Payne | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6429735 | Kuo | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6507226 | Swonger | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6636166 | Sessions | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6664859 | Chen | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6809569 | Wang | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6839862 | Evoy | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859883 | Svestka | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6882046 | Davenport | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6920576 | Ehmann | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7199617 | Schrom | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7302247 | Dupuis | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7327783 | Sullivan | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7376212 | Dupuis | May 2008 | B2 |
7400173 | Kwong | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7411421 | Steinke | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7421028 | Dupuis | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447492 | Dupuis | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460604 | Dupuis | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7577223 | Alfano et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7650130 | Dupuis | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7732889 | Crawley | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737871 | Leung et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751519 | Farbarik et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7755400 | Jordanger et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7821428 | Leung et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7856219 | Dupuis | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7902627 | Dong et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8049573 | Alfano et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8064872 | Dupuis | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8169108 | Dupuis | May 2012 | B2 |
20010052623 | Kameyama | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020021144 | Morgan | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020184544 | Svestka et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186058 | Prodanov | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030214346 | Pelliconi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040076192 | Zerbe | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040159893 | Kitahara | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161068 | Zerbe | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050127452 | Rippke | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174156 | Wu | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060138595 | Kiyotoshi | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060224649 | Chiskis | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070075784 | Pettersson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080174360 | Hsu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080290444 | Crawley | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090146760 | Reefman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090237858 | Steeneken | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100052826 | Callahan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100118918 | Dupuis | May 2010 | A1 |
20100327940 | Eisenstadt | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110006814 | Acar | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120313683 | Rylov | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1291918 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1564884 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2204467 | Nov 1988 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Smith, Greg; “Hybrid Isolation Amps Zap Price and Voltage Barriers”; Electronic Design (Dec. 11, 1986). |
Meinel, Wally, et al; “Hermetic Analog Isolation Amplifier”; Proceedings of the 1987 Int'l Symposium on Microelectronics, Minneapolis, MN, USA 1987. |
Burr Brown; “Noise Sources in Applications Using Capacitive Coupled Isolated Amplifiers”; Application Bulletin, Bur Brown Corp (1993). |
Burr Brown; “Hybrid Isolation Amps Zap Price and Voltage Barriers”; Application Bulletin, Burr Brown Corporation (1994). |
Burr Brown; “IS) 102, ISO 106 Signal Isolation Buffer Amplifiers, Datasheet”; Burr Brown Corp (1995). |
Simoes, J. Basilio, et al; “The Optical Coupling of Analog Signals”; IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science, vol. 43, No. 3; pp. 1672-1674 (Jun. 1996). |
Diamond, Stephen L.; “IEEE 1394: Status and growth path”; IEEE Micro; pp. 75-78 (Jun. 1996). |
Gabara, Thaddeus J., et al; “Capactive coupling and quantized feedback applied to conventional CMOS technology”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 3; (Mar. 1997). |
Paskins, Adrian; “The IEEE 1394 BUS”; The Institution of Electrical Engineers Conference (May 12, 1997). |
Crisp, Richard; “Direct Rambus Technology: The New Main Memory Standard”; IEEE Micro; pp. 18-28 (Nov./Dec. 1997). |
Nilsson, Thomas; “A distributed combined heat and power plant control unit”; Master Thesis, Linköping Institute of Technology (Dec. 16, 1997). |
Wayne, Scott; “Finding the Needle in a Haystack: Measuring Small differential voltages in the presence of large-common mode voltages”; Analog Dialogue, 34-1; pp. 1-4 (2000). |
Infineon Technologies; “IVAX Integrated Voice & ADSL Transceiver, PEB35512, PEB55508, PEB3558, PEB4565, PEB4566, Datasheet”; Infineoun Technologies AG (2001). |
Kuhn, William B., et al; “An RF-based IEEE 1394 Ground Isolator designed in silicon-on-insulator process”; Circuits and Systems, 2001, MWSCAS 2001, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE 2001 Midwest Symposium on, vol. 2; (Aug. 14-17, 2001). |
Irwin, Scott; “Usage Models for multi-gigabit serial transceivers”; Xilinx; WIP157, V1.0 (Mar. 15, 2002). |
“phyCORE-MCF548x Hardware Manual”; PHYTEC Technology Holding Company (Jan. 2005). |
LATRONIX; “Xpress-DR+Wireless—datasheet”; (2006). |
Culuciello, Eugenio, et al.; “Capacitive inter-chip data and power transfer for 3-D VLSI”; IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, vol. 53, No. 12; pp. 1348-1352 (2006). |
Marcus, Geoffrey, et al; “A Monolithic Isolation Amplifier in silicon-on-isolator CMOS: Testing and Applications”; Analog Integr. Circ. Sig. Process (Jun. 27, 2006). |
Inoue, A., et al; “A high efficiency, high voltage, balanced cascade FET”; IEEE International Microwave Symposium (Jun. 1995). |
Sze, S.M.; “Semiconductor Devices Physics and Technology”; 2nd Edition; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; pp. 493-494 and 503-507 (1985, 2002). |
Burr Brown; “ISO 103, Low Cost, Internally Powered Isolation Amplifier”; IC Publication Datasheet (1989). |
Mick, Stephen, et al; “Packaging Technology for AC Coupled Interconnection”; IEEE Flip-Chip Conference (2002). |
Extended European Search Report for European Pat. Appln. No. 09164445.0 (Nov. 26, 2009). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140152353 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13661275 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14172256 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12829250 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 13661275 | US |