A traditional constant-on-time buck-converter regulates an output voltage by using the ripple on the output voltage as a PWM ramp signal to control the turn-on instant of the transistor that couples the input voltage to the filter inductor.
A constant-on-time buck converter may have a number of advantages over other types of power supplies. For example, a constant-on-time buck converter typically operates at a constant-frequency for steady-state loads, has high efficiency over a wide load range, requires few, if any, additional compensation components, and responds quickly to changes in the load. Furthermore, such a buck converter may transition relatively seamlessly between a pulse-width modulation mode (normal load conditions where the switching frequency is relatively constant) and a pulse-frequency modulation mode (heavy or light load conditions where the switching frequency increases or decreases, respectively).
Referring to
During a discharge time Toff, the transistor Q1 is deactivated and the transistor Q2 is activated such that the decaying current IL flowing through the inductor L also flows through the closed transistor Q2. As IL decays, VOUT ramps downward toward Vref as shown in
When VOUT ramps below Vref, a comparator 12 activates a one shot 14, which activates Q1 and deactivates Q2 for a predetermined “constant-on” or charge time Ton. During the charge time Ton, an increasing current IL flows from the input voltage Vin, through the transistor Q1 and the inductor L, to the filter capacitor Co and load Ro. As IL increases, VOUT ramps upward as shown in
After the elapse of the predetermined charge time Ton, the one shot 14 deactivates Q1 and activates Q2 and the above-described cycle repeats.
There are two components to the ripple on VOUT.
The first component is the in-phase component, which is the voltage generated by current flowing through the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the output filter capacitor Co. The in-phase component is in phase with the inductor current IL, because the voltage across a resistor is in phase with the current through a resistor.
The second component is the out-of-phase component, which is generated by the charging and discharging of the output filter capacitor Co. The out-of-phase component is out of phase with the inductor current IL, because the phase of the voltage across a capacitor lags the phase of the current through the capacitor (the current through the capacitor is in phase with the current trough the inductor L).
Therefore, as discussed below, the value of the ESR affects the stability of the feedback loop of the power supply 10.
Generally, the loop is stable where fESR≦fSW/π, where fSW=1/(Ton+Toff) (the switching frequency), and fESR=1/(2π·ESR·Co).
Consequently, as long as both the ESR and output filter capacitor Co are relatively large (e.g., ESR≦40 milliohms (mΩ)), then the in-phase component of the ripple on VOUT is the dominant component, and thus the phase shift of the ripple relative to the inductor current IL is relatively small. That is, the in-phase component of the ripple caused by the portion of IL that flows through the ESR “swamps out” the out-of-phase component of the ripple.
Therefore, a traditional constant-on-time power supply includes an output filter capacitor Co having an ESR that is large enough to provide a stable feedback loop.
Recently, filter capacitors having ESR values of 5 mΩ or less have become available; it is sometimes desirable to use such a low-ESR filter capacitor in a buck-converter power supply with a relatively high steady-state switching frequency to reduce the size and cost of the converter.
Unfortunately, using such a low-ESR capacitor may render a traditional constant-on-time power supply unstable. An unstable power supply may have too large of a voltage tolerance, VT, as described below in conjunction with
Some integrated-circuit (IC) manufacturers have developed constant-on-time topologies that allow the use of a low-ESR filter capacitor. But unfortunately, these topologies may require additional feedback, additional compensation circuitry, and that the power-supply controller chip have an additional pin, and may yield a relatively poor regulation of VOUT.
An analysis similar to that above may be made for constant-off-time power supplies and other types of power supplies, such as boost and buck-boost, the stabilities of which rely on the filter capacitor ESR.
An embodiment of a power-supply controller includes a signal combiner and a control circuit. The signal combiner is operable to generate a combined feedback signal from sense and output feedback signals that are respectively derived from a sense signal and a regulated output signal, and the signal combiner is operable to receive the sense signal from a sense circuit that is operable to generate the sense signal while a current is flowing through an inductor and while a switch (for example, a transistor) that is coupled between the inductor and a first input-voltage node has a first state. The sense signal generated by the sense circuit is related to the current, and the switch and inductor are operable to cooperate to generate the regulated output signal. The control circuit is coupled to the signal combiner and is operable to cause the switch to have a second state for a predetermined time in response to the combined feedback signal having a predetermined relationship to a reference signal.
For example, such a power-supply controller may yield a relatively tight and stable regulation of an output voltage generated by a power supply (e.g., constant-on time, constant-off time, boost, or buck-boost) that includes a low-ESR filter capacitor, with no additional compensation components and with no additional pin on the power-supply-controller chip.
Features and advantages of one or more embodiments may best be understood by making reference to the following non-limiting description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in the several figures of which like references identify like elements.
In the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. The detailed description and the drawings illustrate specific exemplary embodiments. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. The following detailed description is therefore not to be taken in a limiting sense.
The supply 40 includes a power-supply controller IC 42 and a filter circuit 44, and provides a regulated output voltage VOUT to a load, which is represented by a resistor Ro.
In addition to the transistors Q1 and Q2, the comparator 12, and the one shot 14, the IC 42 includes a signal combiner, for example an adder, 46, which adds an inverse of a sense signal, for example a sense voltage Vsense, to VOUT, and which provides the resulting combined feedback signal, for example, Vsum, to an inverting input node of the comparator 12. Vsense effectively enhances or replaces the contribution to the feedback signal Vsum of the in-phase component of the VOUT ripple generated by ESR, and thus allows the power supply 40 to maintain a tight and stable regulation of VOUT even where ESR is relatively low, or even near 0Ω. Furthermore, because the on resistance Rds(on) of the transistor Q2 generates Vsense at the source of Q2, the adder 46 is the only additional circuitry that the IC 42 includes as compared to the power supply 10 of
The filter circuit 44 includes the filter inductor L having an equivalent series resistance Rcs, and includes the output filter capacitor Co having a relatively low ESR.
Referring to
During a discharge time Toff, the transistor Q1 is deactivated and the transistor Q2 is activated such that the discharging, i.e., decaying, current IL flowing through the inductor L also flows through the transistor Q2. As IL decays, Vsum ramps downward toward Vref as shown in
When Vsum ramps below Vref, the comparator 12 activates the one shot 14, which activates Q1 and deactivates Q2 for a predetermined “constant-on” charging time Ton, the value of which for a steady-state load is Ro given by the following equation:
where K is a constant that depends on the circuit topology and component values. The dependence of Ton on IL·Q2Rds(on) allows the switching frequency fsw to be substantially independent of the load current Io within a predetermined range of Io. That is, by changing Ton, and thus the switching duty cycle, the power supply 40 maintains fsw at a substantially constant frequency for a steady-state load Ro. Furthermore, because at the beginning of Ton the voltage Vsense changes from a negative to a positive voltage with respect to ground, Vsum “jumps” downward by a DC offset voltage Voffsetdown. The adder 46 may be designed to effectively “ignore” a positive Vsense above a certain value by limiting it or by assigning a predetermined value such as 0V to Vsense when Vsense is positive and above a certain value. For example, one may include a resistor between the drain of Q2 and the inverting input of adder 46 (not shown) and connect a diode (not shown) between the source of Q2 (cathode) and the inverting input of the adder 46 (anode) so that the diode blocks Vsense when Vsense is more positive than a diode forward voltage (approximately 0.7V). Other conventional topologies for implementing this function are known, and therefore, are not described in detail. Alternatively, the adder 46 may be designed to effectively “ignore” Vsense when Q1 is active or when Q2 is inactive by sampling, for example. This (as well as the diode-limiting circuit described above) allows the controller 42 to detect a reverse current through the inductor L (from Co toward transistor Q2), as may occur during light-load in continuous-current mode (CCM) operating mode—such a reverse current causes Vsense to be positive while Q2 is active.
During Ton, an increasing current IL flows from the input voltage Vin, through the transistor Q1 and the inductor L, and to the filter capacitor Co and the load Ro. As IL increases, VOUT, and thus Vsum, ramps upward.
After the elapse of the predetermined on time Ton, the one shot 14 deactivates the transistor Q1 and activates the transistor Q2 and the above-described cycle repeats. Because at the end of Ton Vsense changes from a positive to a negative voltage, Vsum “jumps” upward by a DC offset voltage Voffsetup. Furthermore, because IL is at a minimum at the beginning of Ton and at a maximum at the end of Ton, Voffsetdown is typically less than Voffsetup.
Referring to
Consequently, because for the same parameters, the VT of the supply 40 is approximately ½ the VT of the supply 10, if one specifies a VT of 70 mV, then he can reduce the value of Co of the supply 40 to 400 μF, which is half the 800 μF value of Co of the supply 10. That is, using a Co=400 μF in the power supply 10 yields a VT of approximately 70 mV. This reduction in the value of Co may reduce the size and cost of Co as compared to the Co of the supply 10, and thus may reduce the size and cost of the supply 40 as compared to the supply 10.
Referring again to
In addition to the transistor Q2, the sensing circuit 50 includes transistors Q3 and Q4, a differential amplifier 52, and a resistive sense element 54, here a sense resistor. The transistors Q2 and Q3 have similar dimensions, and the gain G of the amplifier 52 and the value of the sense amplifier 54 are selected such that Isense/IQ2 is small, for example 1/1000. Also, the thermal response of Q2 closely matches that of Q3; a sufficient matching of the thermal response typically occurs where Q2 and Q3 are disposed on the same IC.
The operation of the sensing circuit 50 is now described in conjunction with
When the one shot 14 (
The amplifier 52 generates an output signal Q4drive that equals G(VsQ3−VsQ2), where VsQ3 is the voltage at the source of the transistor Q3, and VsQ2 is the voltage at the source of the transistor Q2. Because Q2 and Q3 have similar dimensions and Isense<<IQ2, VsQ2<VsQ3 for IQ2>0.
The signal Q4drive causes the transistor Q4 to source to the element 54 the current Isense, which is proportional to VsQ3−VsQ2; consequently, Vsense is also proportional to VsQ3−VsQ2. More specifically, because the transistor Q4 acts as a voltage follower, Isense≈[G(VSQ3−VsQ2)−Vt]/(sense element 54), where Vt is the threshold voltage of the transistor Q4. Furthermore, because Isense is relatively small, VsQ3 remains relatively constant as compared to VsQ2 such that Isense varies substantially linearly with VsQ2. And because VsQ2 is the voltage across the Rds(on) of Q2, and thus varies substantially linearly with IQ2, Isense varies substantially linearly with IQ2. Moreover, because Isense<<IQ2, IQ2 approximately equals IL (i.e., IQ2≈IL); consequently, Isense varies substantially linearly with IL, as is desired in this embodiment.
Because Q2 and Q3 are thermally matched, VsQ3 and VsQ2 shift by substantially the same amount in response to a change in temperature. But even with this temperature-induced shift, the difference between VsQ3 and VsQ2, and thus Q4drive, Isense, and Vsense, remain substantially unchanged with temperature for a given IL. Put another way, the similar temperature-induced shifts in VsQ3 and VsQ2 compose a common-mode signal at the input nodes of the differential amplifier 52, which rejects this common-mode signal, thus rendering Vsense less sensitive to temperature than if Vsense were taken directly across the transistor Q2 as shown in
Still referring to
A first scaler 70, for example a resistive voltage divider including resistors R2 and R3, may generate Vsense from the voltage across Q2.
A second scaler 72, for example a resistive voltage divider including resistors R4 and R5, may generate a scaled version of VOUT at the noninverting input of the adder 46.
Although described as scaling the voltage across Q2 and VOUT by a respective factors that are less than one, the scalers 70 and 72 may scale the voltage across Q2 and VOUT by respective factors that are greater than or equal to one.
Alternate embodiments of the supply 40 of
In addition to the transistor Q2, the sensing circuit 80 includes transistors Q3-Q7, a first differential amplifier 84, a second differential amplifier 86, and resistors R6 and R7. The W/L ratio of the transistor Q2 is significantly larger than the W/L ratio of the transistor Q3 such that Isense/IQ2 is relatively small, for example≈ 1/1000 or lower. Also, the thermal response of Q2 closely matches that of Q3 so that the ratio Isense/IQ2 remains substantially constant over a predetermined temperature range for example, an expected operating range of 0°-125° C.; a sufficient matching of the thermal response typically occurs where Q2 and Q3 are disposed in the same region of the same IC. Furthermore, the W/L ratio of the transistor Q6 may be approximately equal to the W/L ratio of Q7 such that the current mirror formed by Q6 and Q7 may have a gain of about unity, and R6 may be approximately equal to R7.
The combiner 82 includes a resistor R8 coupled between the Vsum and VOUT nodes.
The operation of the sensing circuit 80 is now described in conjunction with
When the one shot 14 (
Initially, Q2 conducts an inductor-discharge current IQ2 that flows from Q2 into the filter inductor L.
Because R6≈R7, the amplifier 84 drives Q4 such that the drain voltage VdQ3≈−VdQ2. Consequently, because the gate voltages of Q2 and Q3 are the same, and because the magnitudes of VdsQ2 and VdsQ3 are substantially equal, the current IQ3 through Q3 substantially equals −IQ2(W/LQ3)/(W/LQ2). And, where Q2 and Q3 are disposed near each other on the same IC or are otherwise thermally matched, this relationship between IQ2 and IQ3 remains substantially constant over process variations and over an expected operational-temperature range.
The current mirror formed by Q6 and Q7, which has a gain of substantially unity per above, generates Isense≈IQ3.
And Vsum=IsenseR8+VOUT.
Furthermore, while IQ2 is flowing from Q2 to L, the amplifier 86 maintains Q5 in an inactive state.
As discussed above in conjunction with
If the load current is higher than half of the peak-to peak inductor current in the power supply 40, Vsum becomes less than Vref while the direction of IQ2 is still from Q2 to L.
But in a low-power mode of operation, the power supply 40 may allow IQ2 to reverse direction, such that IQ2 flows from the inductor L to Q2, and may not activate the one shot 14 until the magnitude of this reverse-direction IQ2 reaches a threshold.
If IQ2 reverses direction, i.e., begins to flow from L to Q2, then the amplifier 84 turns Q4 off, such that Q6 and Q7 are deactivated and no longer generate Isense.
But the amplifier 86 activates Q5 such that the drain voltage VdQ3≈VdQ2. Consequently, because the gate voltages of Q2 and Q3 are the same, and because VdsQ2 and VdsQ3 are substantially equal, the current IQ3 through Q3 substantially equals IQ2(W/LQ3)/(W/LQ2). And, where Q2 and Q3 are near each other on the same IC or are otherwise thermally matched, this relationship between IQ2 and IQ3 remains substantially constant over process variations and an expected operational-temperature range.
Therefore, Q5 generates Isense IQ3.
And Vsum=−IsenseR8+VOUT.
So, in summary, as IQ2 decreases in magnitude as it flows in a forward direction (from Q2 to L), Vsum ramps downward toward VOUT. When IQ2=0, Vsum=VOUT. And as IQ2 reverses direction and increases in magnitude (e.g., in a low-power mode of operation), Vsum continues to ramp downward from VOUT.
Still referring to
Because the input offsets of the amplifiers 84 and 86 may be different, the sensing circuit 80 may cause Vsum to have a discontinuity, i.e., a “flat spot,” where Isense crosses zero.
Like the sensing circuits 50 of
The circuit 90 is similar to the circuit 80 of
The operation of the sensing circuit 90 is now described in conjunction with
When the one shot 14 (
Initially, Q2 conducts an inductor-discharge current IQ2 that flows from Q2 into the filter inductor L.
Because R6≈R7, the amplifier 84 drives Q4 such that the drain voltage VdQ3≈−VdQ2+2*V1. Consequently, because the gate voltages of Q2 and Q3 are the same, and because the magnitudes of VdsQ2 and VdsQ3 are substantially equal but for the offset V1, the current IQ3 through Q3 substantially equals −IQ2(W/LQ3)/(W/LQ2)+IQ3offset, where IQ3offset is equal to 2*V1 divided by the effective Rdson of Q3. And, where Q2 and Q3 are near each other on the same IC or are otherwise thermally matched, this relationship between IQ2 and IQ3 remains substantially constant over process variations and over an expected temperature range.
The current mirror formed by Q6 and Q7, which has a gain of substantially unity in this embodiment, generates a current IQ7≈IQ3≈−IQ2(W/LQ3)/(W/LQ2)+IQ3offset.
Furthermore, the amplifier 86 causes a voltage substantially equal to V1 to be across Q3′.
Choosing Q3′ substantially twice as wide as Q3, i.e., its Rdson being approximately half of Q3, yields IQ3≈IQ3offset≈2*V1/Rdson(Q3).
Therefore, Isense≈−IQ2(W/LQ3)/(W/LQ2)+IQ3offset−IQ3offset≈−IQ2(W/LQ3)/(W/LQ2).
And Vsum=IsenseR8+VOUT.
So, in summary, the amplifier 84, MOSFET transistors Q3, Q4, Q6, Q7, and resistors R6, R7, R9, and R10 of the current-sense circuit 90 work for both positive and negative inductor currents flowing through MOSFET Q2 without a crossover discontinuity.
Still referring to
From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
The present application is a continuation in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/254,525, filed Oct. 20, 2008, currently pending; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/443,838, filed May 30, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,439,721, issued Oct. 21, 2008; which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 60/687,165, filed on Jun. 3, 2005, all of the foregoing applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6181120 | Hawkes et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6492794 | Hwang | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6495995 | Groom et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6583610 | Groom et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
7045993 | Tomiyoshi | May 2006 | B1 |
7439721 | Weng et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
20030142519 | Walters et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050007087 | Pullen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050258814 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20090102447 | Weng et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100264895 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60687165 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11443838 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 12254525 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12254525 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 12826577 | US |