The present invention is generally related to power systems, and, more particularly, to a power system for driving an electromotive traction system and auxiliary equipment.
A diesel-electric locomotive typically includes a diesel engine coupled to drive a main alternator and one or more auxiliary alternators. The main alternator is coupled to power one or more traction motors, and the auxiliary alternators are coupled to power locomotive auxiliary electrical equipment, such as radiator fan motors, traction motor blowers, alternator blowers, air compressors, etc.
The auxiliary equipment has generally been operated at a different voltage than the operating voltage of the traction motors. For example, the traction motors may be typically operated at a relatively higher voltage, while the auxiliary equipment may be operated at a relatively lower voltage. The lower voltage operation may allow for the use of auxiliary equipment with relatively lower insulation ratings at their windings to handle correspondingly lower voltage spikes. Such spikes may repetitively (e.g., on every turn-on and turn-off) result from the switching operation of inverter drive circuitry, such as high-speed power switches (e.g., insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) switches and the like) coupled to drive the equipment. Thus, if the voltage level of a common bus, or bus voltage, for powering both the traction motors and the auxiliary equipment were to be set to a sufficiently high voltage level appropriate for powering the traction motors, this would require auxiliary equipment with costlier insulation ratings to avoid potential insulation damage due to the correspondingly higher voltage spikes. It will be appreciated that the magnitude of the voltage spikes may be substantially amplified as a result of standing wave reflections that arise when the distances between the inverter (drive) and the load increases.
Accordingly, the designer may be faced with the choice of using separate power buses for the traction motors and the auxiliary equipment or may be faced with the choice of using costlier motors for the auxiliary equipment, if a common power bus is used. It will be appreciated that either of the foregoing choices incrementally adds to the cost and weight of the locomotive. Thus, there is a need of a practical and reliable power system that provides a cost-effective solution to overcome the above-described issues.
Aspects of the present invention provide a power system. The system includes an electrical power source (e.g., an alternator) and a power bus coupled to receive electrical power from the power source. The system further includes a traction system coupled to the power bus. The traction system includes at least one electromotive machine having a first type of stator winding configured to provide a level of protection relative to voltage spikes expected at the traction stator under a first voltage level appropriate for the traction system. Auxiliary equipment is coupled to the power bus. The auxiliary equipment includes at least one electromotive machine having a second type of stator winding configured to provide a level of protection relative to voltage spikes expected at the auxiliary stator under a second voltage level. The second voltage level may be lower than the first voltage level. Inverter circuitry is coupled to drive the auxiliary equipment, and signal-conditioning circuitry may be coupled to attenuate repetitive voltage spikes produced by the inverter circuitry. The power bus may be operated at the first voltage level, and the voltage spike attenuation is sufficient to protect the auxiliary stator notwithstanding of operation of the power bus at the first voltage level.
Further aspects of the present invention provide a method for arranging and operating a powered system. The method allows coupling a power bus to receive electrical power from a power source (e.g., an alternator). The method further allows coupling a traction system to the power bus. The traction system includes at least one electromotive machine having a first type of stator winding configured to provide a level of protection relative to voltage spikes expected at the traction stator under a first voltage level appropriate for the traction system. Auxiliary equipment is coupled to the power bus. The auxiliary equipment includes at least one electromotive machine having a second type of stator winding configured to provide a level of protection relative to voltage spikes expected at the auxiliary stator under a second voltage level. The second voltage level may be lower than the first voltage level. Inverter circuitry is coupled to drive the auxiliary equipment. The power bus may be operated at the first voltage level. Power from the inverter to the auxiliary equipment may be conditioned to attenuate voltage spikes produced by the inverter circuitry and/or interconnecting cables. The voltage spike attenuation is sufficient to protect the auxiliary stator notwithstanding of operating the power bus at the first voltage level.
Embodiments of the invention are explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
Aspects of the present invention may be utilized in power systems, such as may be used for driving an electromotive traction system and auxiliary equipment through a common power bus. Example vehicular applications of the power system may be in locomotives, marine vessels, off-highway vehicles (as may be equipped with rubber tires, such as mining vehicles, agricultural vehicles) and transit vehicles. For purpose of illustration, aspects of the invention are described herein as it may be applied to a locomotive.
The inventors of the present invention have recognized relatively inexpensive and uncomplicated signal-conditioning circuitry (SCC or S.C.C.) 60 and/or techniques that allow for the coupling of auxiliary equipment (e.g., auxiliary load) 39 to common power bus 37 having a voltage sufficiently high so that the traction motors may be operated at an example voltage range from approximately 1,000 volts to approximately 1500 volts.
In one example embodiment, the traction system includes one or more electromotive machines having a first type of stator windings (e.g., form-wound windings) configured to provide a level of protection relative to voltage spikes expected at the traction stator under a first voltage level appropriate for the traction system (e.g., from approximately 1000 volts to approximately 1500 volts). That is, the electromotive machine operates at (or around) the first voltage level, but may receive voltage spikes above the first voltage level, which are at least partially protected against by the stator windings. By way of comparison, the auxiliary equipment may include one or more electromotive machines having a second type of stator winding (e.g., random-wound windings) configured to provide a level of protection relative to voltage spikes expected at the auxiliary stator when operating under a second voltage level lower than the first voltage level (e.g., from approximately 400 volts to approximately 750 volts). In operation, the voltage spike attenuation provided by SCC 60 is sufficient to protect the auxiliary stator notwithstanding operation of the power bus at the first voltage level.
In one example embodiment, SCC 60 comprises respective filters (e.g., low-pass filters (LPFs) or band-pass filters (BPFs) configured to suppress (e.g., attenuate) repetitive (e.g., recurring) voltage spikes produced under relatively high dV/dt conditions resulting from the switching operation of inverter drive circuitry, such as high-speed power switches, coupled to drive the equipment.
In another example embodiment, SCC 60 may be realized without the use of filters (or in combination with filters), as such circuitry may be realized through appropriate selection of the characteristics of interconnecting lines 62 (
In yet another example embodiment, one may reduce the rate of change (dV/dt) by adjusting (e.g., slowing down) the switching speed of the inverter switching devices, such as by making appropriate changes in their respective gate drive circuits or by choosing a relatively lossier switching device (e.g., power switching devices having an inherently lesser rate of change dV/dt. For example, a typical switching speed of IGBTs, as may be used in inverters, is approximately 10,000 Volts/microsecond. In one example embodiment, it has been shown that one may slow down the switching speed to approximately 1000 Volts/microsecond to reduce the voltage spikes at the auxiliary load terminals to acceptable levels within about 100 feet of cable. It will be appreciated that the level to which a given switching device is slowed down may be a function of cable length and the desired level of voltage spike suppression at the auxiliary load terminals.
It is contemplated that the signal conditioning may be a combination of the above-described operations. For example a combination of at least two of a) filtering the signals from the inverter circuitry to the auxiliary equipment; b) establishing an impedance match between the auxiliary equipment and at least one line interconnecting the inverter circuitry and the auxiliary equipment; and c) adjusting a switching speed of a power switching device in the inverter circuitry.
As a result of the voltage spike filtering, voltage reflection attenuation, switching speed reduction, or combination of the foregoing, it is now practical to use in one example embodiment, random-wound motors in the auxiliary equipment 39. As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, random-wound motor windings can be made at reduced costs over form-wound windings. However, the arrangement of random-wound windings may be more vulnerable to voltage spikes than form-wound windings. More particularly, in form-wound windings the winding turns are arranged in a precise spatial arrangement relative to one another. For example, in a form-wound construction, turn one may be always next to turn two, turn two may be always next to turn three, and so on. By way of comparison, in random-wound windings the turns have a random location and the wires in a given turn can be arranged next to any other turn.
As noted above, prior to the present invention, the voltage spikes repetitively resulting from the switching operation of inverter drive circuitry could have lead to a premature failure of a random-wound motor and that is why such type of motors could not be utilized in a practical power system with a common bus for directly powering both the traction motors and the auxiliary equipment. However, in accordance with aspects of the present invention, signal-conditioning circuitry 60 allows one to couple random-wound motors on the same power bus for the traction motors.
In one example embodiment, the signal-conditioning circuitry may comprise an RLC-based (resistor/inductor/capacitor) filter (e.g., band-pass filter) arranged in a Y-circuit topology, as schematically illustrated in inset 70 in
In another example embodiment, the signal-conditioning circuitry may comprise an RC-based (resistor/capacitor) low-pass filter as schematically illustrated in respective insets 82 (Y-circuit topology) and 85 (Δ-circuit topology, i.e., delta-circuit topology) in
Inset 90 illustrates an RLC-based low-pass filter also arranged in a Y-circuit topology. In this example embodiment, in each filter branch 71, a respective inductor 72 is in parallel circuit with a respective resistor 74 and this parallel circuit is series connected to a respective capacitor 73. Again presuming a line separation from the output side of auxiliary inverter 44 to the input side of auxiliary load 39 is a distance L, then it is contemplated that if one uses any of the filter topologies respectively illustrated in insets 82, 84 or 90, then one example range for locating such filters may be from the input side of the auxiliary load to a distance L/2 upstream from the auxiliary load, as schematically represented by arrow 92. In one example application, the filter location may be up to about 15-20 feet from the auxiliary load, however, a preferred location may be as near as practical to the auxiliary load.
It will be appreciated that the value of one or more of the filter elements need not be fully-based on the value of discrete components since, for example, one can estimate and/or model a reactance (capacitance or inductance) of any auxiliary load coupled to a given inverter, as well as the intrinsic reactance of a connecting line itself, and one can make use of the value of the load and intrinsic reactance for implementing at least some of the filter circuitry. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the estimating and/or modeling of the load and intrinsic reactance may be accomplished using any standard estimating and/or modeling tools, such as are commonly available and well-understood in the art of transmission line design.
When it is referred to herein that a filter or other circuit is “based” on one or more circuit elements, e.g., resistor/capacitor-based filter, this means that the filter or other circuit includes at least one each of the stated circuit elements arranged to perform the stated function of the circuit, e.g., for a resistor/capacitor-based filter at least one resistor and at least one capacitor arranged to perform a filtering function.
In operation, using a common bus for the traction and auxiliary loads is conducive to reducing (or avoiding) costs that otherwise would be incurred in a dual bus implementation, such as needing another stage of power & voltage conversion. This advantageously allows for bi-directional flow of power between the traction and the auxiliary loads with higher efficiency. Moreover, using a common bus is conducive to a desirable reduction of components. For example, a common capacitor 41 (and/or bus bar) can now be used to connect the auxiliary and the traction inverters through the common bus instead of separate capacitors and/or bus bars for two separate buses. As shown in
While various embodiments illustrating aspects of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be understood that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4855891 | Paul | Aug 1989 | A |
4896063 | Roberts | Jan 1990 | A |
5258902 | Lindbery et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5481451 | Kuwahara | Jan 1996 | A |
6166929 | Ma et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6304013 | Akers et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6366483 | Ma et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6441581 | King et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6455971 | Palma et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6486568 | King et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6678972 | Naruse et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6909200 | Bouchon | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7256513 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7304445 | Donnelly | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7535116 | Daigle et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7565867 | Donnelly et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7573153 | Rebbereh | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020096959 | Qin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030118891 | Saito et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20060025902 | Brown et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060076171 | Donnelly et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060119177 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060127704 | Raiser | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080087479 | Kang | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090288577 | Kumar | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004066492 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2006056235 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100148581 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |