This document relates, generally, to a power tool, and in particular, to a power tool for sanding a workpiece.
Power tools, and in particular, power tools used to provide a desired surface finish on a workpiece, may include, for example, polishers, sheet sanders, random orbit sanders, and the like. Some of these types of power tools may employ an eccentric motion to remove material from the surface of the workpiece, and improve surface finish.
In one aspect, a power tool may include a housing, a motor in the housing, a drive shaft, a first end portion of the drive shaft being coupled to the motor, a platen, a retainer bearing coupled to a first surface of the platen, an eccentric sleeve coupled to a second end portion of the drive shaft, the eccentric sleeve being coupled in the retainer bearing to eccentrically couple the drive shaft to the platen, and a counterweight coupled to the second end portion of the drive shaft, between the first surface of the platen and the eccentric sleeve. The counterweight may be positioned such that a counterweight axis defined along a radial centerline of the counterweight is offset by a predetermined angle with respect to an orbit radius axis of an eccentric mass including eccentric sleeve, retainer bearing and platen coupled to the second end portion of the drive shaft.
In another aspect, a power tool may include a motor, a drive shaft, a first end portion of the drive shaft being coupled to the motor, a platen, a retainer bearing coupled to a first surface of the platen, an eccentric sleeve coupled to a second end portion of the drive shaft, the eccentric sleeve being coupled in the retainer bearing to eccentrically couple the drive shaft to the platen, a counterweight coupled to the second end portion of the drive shaft, between the first surface of the platen and the eccentric sleeve, and a mass member included on the counterweight, positioned on a peripheral diametric edge portion of the counterweight.
In another aspect, a power tool may include a motor, a drive shaft, a first end portion of the drive shaft being coupled to the motor, a platen, a retainer bearing coupled to the platen, a fan coupled to the drive shaft, the fan including a first counterweight and a hub portion, the drive shaft extending through an opening in the hub portion, a sleeve coupled to the hub portion of the fan, the sleeve being coupled in the retainer bearing, and a second counterweight coupled to a second end portion of the drive shaft, between the first surface of the platen and the sleeve.
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
An example implementation of an eccentric motion power tool is shown in
To counteract imbalance in the eccentric coupler 15/retainer bearing 14/platen 16 generated due to the eccentric coupling of the platen 16 to the drive shaft 12 during operation, in some embodiments, the tool 10 may include a counterweight 18 coupled to the drive shaft 12. A coupling device 19, such as, for example, a washer 19A and a fastener 19B, may couple the counterweight 18 in position at the end of the drive shaft 12, with a dust cap 17 covering the assembled counterweight 18 and drive shaft 12. In some embodiments, the counterweight 18 may be positioned opposite the center of gravity of the platen 16, for example, approximately 180 degrees from the center of gravity of the platen 16. Positioning of the counterweight 18 in this manner may counteract imbalance and reduce vibration when the motor is rotating the drive shaft 12. However, when the platen 16, and in particular, a sheet of sandpaper attached to the outer surface 16A of the platen 16, contacts a workpiece during operation, vibration of the tool 10 may increase due to additional external forces introduced by resistance between the finishing surface of the workpiece and the sandpaper.
To counteract an additional force, or force vector, generated due to the resistance between the finishing surface of the workpiece and the sandpaper, in some embodiments, the counterweight may be arranged at a relatively small offset angle with respect to an orbit radius axis. In some embodiments, the counterweight may be positioned as close to the source of this additional vibration and/or imbalance as possible, for example, as close to the lower surface of the platen as possible, for example, between the bearing retainer and the lower surface of the platen. Arranging the counterweight at a relatively small offset angle with respect to the orbit axis radius, and/or arranging the counterweight as close to the lower surface of the platen as possible may balance the rotating masses to reduce vibration and counteract the force vector generated due to the interaction between the sandpaper and the workpiece, thus reducing effective vibration of the tool engaged with a workpiece during operation.
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, the offset angle θ may be greater than 0.0 and less than or equal to approximately 9.0 degrees to achieve a desired reduction in vibration levels. In some embodiments, the offset angle θ may be greater than 0.0 degrees and less than or equal to 6.0 degrees to achieve a desired reduction in vibration levels. In some embodiments, the offset angle θ may be between approximately 6.0 degrees and 9.0 degrees to achieve a desired reduction in vibration levels. In some embodiments, arrangement of the counterweight so that a portion of the counterweight mass is located as close to the plane of the workpiece as possible, and at an relatively small offset angle with respect to the orbit radius, as described above, may reduce vibration by up to approximately 40%, depending on, for example, orbit radius, operation speed and the like. For example, in one implementation, a tool vibration level, when the tool is actively engaged with a workpiece during operation, may be less than approximately 2.5 m/s2. Various combinations of orbit radius R, offset angle θ and resulting reductions in vibration levels are shown in Table 1 below.
As shown in Table 1 above, and in the graph of
For example, in a first example implementation of a sanding tool represented by combination 3 in Table 1, an example orbit radius of 1.3 mm and an offset angle of approximately 6.0 degrees may result in a vibration level of approximately 2.6 m/s2, resulting in an approximately 30% reduction in vibration compared to the same tool having an orbit radius of 1.3 mm, but with the counterweight aligned with the driven shaft centerline (i.e., an offset angle of 0.0 degrees). In a second example implementation, represented by combination 8 in Table 1, an example orbit radius of 1.4 mm and an offset angle of approximately 6.0 degrees may result in a vibration level of approximately 2.5 m/s2, resulting in an approximately 34% reduction in vibration compared to the same tool having an orbit radius of 1.4 mm, but with the counterweight aligned with the driven shaft centerline (i.e., an offset angle of 0.0 degrees). In a third example implementation, represented by combination 9 in Table 1, an example orbit radius of 1.4 mm and an offset angle of approximately 9.0 degrees may result in a vibration level of approximately 2.4 m/s2, resulting in an approximately 37% reduction in vibration compared to the same tool having an orbit radius of 1.4 mm, but with the counterweight aligned with the driven shaft centerline (i.e., an offset angle of 0.0 degrees).
As noted above, arrangement of the counterweight so that at least a portion of the counterweight mass is located as close to the plane of the workpiece as possible, and at an relatively small offset angle with respect to the orbit radius, rather than aligned with the driven shaft centerline, as described above, may reduce vibration to varying degrees, depending on various factors associated with a particular tool implementation, such as, for example, orbit radius, operation speed and the like.
The tool 300 may include a housing 310 housing a drive shaft 320 driven by a motor 330 to rotate about a driven shaft centerline 320A, with an eccentric sleeve 350 eccentrically positioned around a distal end portion of the drive shaft 320, centered about an eccentric mass centerline 350A, and retained by a bearing retainer 340 that is coupled to an inner surface portion of a platen 360, similar to the tool 200 described above with respect to
The counterweight 380 may include a counterforce mass member 385. The counterforce mass member 385 may be coupled to, or affixed to, or integral to the counterweight 380, and may be positioned to a particular sector of the counterweight 380, such as, for example, along a diameter line 381 of the counterweight 380. The counterforce mass member 385 may be made of the same material as the counterweight 380, or may be made of a different material than the counterweight 380. In the example implementation shown in
The counterforce mass member 385 may be positioned on the counterweight 380, on one side of the orbit radius axis RA opposite the remainder of the counterweight 380, to increase the weight on the one side of the counterweight 380. The additional mass added to the one side of the counterweight 380 by the counterforce mass member 385 may counteract imbalance and vibration generated by the rotating masses, that is, the rotation of the structure including the eccentric sleeve 350, bearing retainer 340 and platen 360, thus reducing vibration of the tool 300 engaged with a workpiece during operation.
As discussed above, in the example implementation shown in
The counterweight 380 and the counterforce mass member 385 may work together to counteract the imbalance and vibration generated by the rotating masses, and may reduce vibration of the tool 300 engaged with a workpiece during operation. In some embodiments, arrangement of the counterweight 380 and the counterforce mass member 385 so that a portion of the counterforce mass is located as close to the plane of the workpiece as possible, with the counterweight 380 and the counterforce mass member 385 positioned to counteract imbalance due to vibration generated by the rotating masses, may reduce vibration by up to approximately 40%, as discussed in detail above, so that when the tool 300 is actively engaged with a workpiece during operation, vibration may be less than approximately 2.5 m/s2.
The tool 400 may include a housing 410 housing a drive shaft 420 driven by a motor 430 to rotate about a driven shaft centerline 420A. A sleeve 450 may be retained by a bearing retainer 440 that is coupled to an inner surface portion of a platen 460, similar to the tool 200 described above with respect to
A first counterweight 480, in the form of a weighted fan 480, may be positioned on the drive shaft 420, adjacent to the bearing retainer 440, to generate a flow of air within the housing 410 for cooling of the components received in the housing 410 and/or to direct finishing material/sanding dust removed from the workpiece into a collection receptacle. A distal end portion of the drive shaft 420 may be received in an opening 481 formed in a hub portion 482 of the fan 480. In some embodiments, the opening 481 may be eccentrically positioned in the hub 482, so that a first sector of the hub 482 includes more material than a second (opposite) sector of the hub 482, thus weighting the fan 480 in the area of the first (weighted) sector. In some embodiments, the distal end portion of the drive shaft 420 may be tapered in a portion of the drive shaft 420 corresponding to the weighted sector of the hub 482 of the fan 480. The hub portion 482 of the weighted fan 480 may be coupled in the sleeve 450 and the bearing retainer 440, which is in turn coupled to the platen 460. In some embodiments, a second counterweight 486 may be coupled to the distal end of the drive shaft 420, between the bearing retainer 440/sleeve 450/hub portion 482 of the weighted fan 480 and the platen 460.
The first counterweight 480 and the second counterweight 486 may work together to counteract the imbalance and vibration generated by the rotating masses, and may reduce vibration of the tool 400 engaged with a workpiece during operation. In some embodiments, arrangement of the first counterweight 480 and the second counterweight 486 so that a portion of the counterweight mass is located as close to the plane of the workpiece as possible, with the first counterweight 480 and the second counterweight 486 positioned to counteract imbalance due to vibration generated by the rotating masses, may reduce vibration by up to approximately 40%, as discussed in detail above, so that when the tool 400 is actively engaged with a workpiece during operation, vibration may be less than approximately 2.5 m/s2.
While certain features of the described implementations have been illustrated as described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes and equivalents will now occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the scope of the implementations. It should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, not limitation, and various changes in form and details may be made. Any portion of the apparatus and/or methods described herein may be combined in any combination, except mutually exclusive combinations. The implementations described herein can include various combinations and/or sub-combinations of the functions, components and/or features of the different implementations described.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/074,936, filed Nov. 4, 2014, titled “Power Tool Counterweight Arrangement And Mass Member,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62074936 | Nov 2014 | US |