1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a power tool and a method for operating a power tool.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the related art, it is known, for example, from Published German patent application document DE 101 03 142 A1, that a starting safety routine against instances of locking-up during starting may be provided, in which for a brief period of time, an electric motor is connected to the power supply system via a determinable resistance and a limiting value and/or the switch-off time for a safety routine against tool jamming is set by measuring the angle of rotation of the rotor over the period of time as a function of the start-up behavior of a rotor during the period of time.
An object of the present invention is to increase the ease of operation of a power tool for a user.
The described power tool and the described method have the advantage that an unchecked angular motion of the power tool, which reduces the ease of operation for the user, is safely and reliably detected. This is achieved by providing a filter, which filters at least one measured value of the detected motion; and the power output of the drive unit, that is, the torque and/or the rotational speed, are reduced, and/or the drive unit is switched off, and/or the drive unit is decelerated, when the filtered, measured value reaches and/or exceeds and/or falls below a limiting value.
In one specific embodiment, a low-pass filter and/or a high-pass filter is provided as a filter. With the aid of the low-pass filter and/or the high-pass filter, the measuring signal may be accurately acquired. For example, values of 125 Hz or 250 Hz may be used as a cutoff frequency for the low-pass filter. Filters, which have a cutoff frequency of, e.g., 0.5 Hz or 1 Hz, may be used as high-pass filters. The acquired measuring signal may be separated from interfering portions of the signal through the use of the low-pass filter and/or the high-pass filter. Consequently, the measuring signal may be evaluated more accurately.
In a further specific embodiment, the characteristic of the filter is a function of the type of storage battery, in particular, a function of the weight of the storage battery used. Power tools may be driven by different storage batteries. In this context, storage batteries having different weights may be used. Consequently, the storage batteries having different weights have an influence on the vibration response of the power tool. Thus, consideration of the weight of the storage battery provides improved evaluation of the measuring signal, which means that interference signals may be filtered out more effectively.
For example, the type of storage battery may be detected automatically by the power tool or input by an operator via an input device, such as a switch or a selector lever. In one further specific embodiment, the power tool has an acceleration sensor and/or a rotation-rate sensor; the measuring signal of the acceleration sensor and the measuring signal of the rotation-rate sensor being able to be filtered using different filter characteristics. An increased and improved accuracy regarding the type of motion of the power tool is possible through the use of the acceleration sensor and the rotation-rate sensor. The acceleration sensor and the rotation-rate sensor supply different measuring signals, which means that individual filtering of the different measuring signals renders improved signal evaluation possible.
In a further specific embodiment, the filtered measuring signal of the acceleration sensor and/or the filtered measuring signal of the rotation-rate sensor are integrated with respect to time and used for detecting an unchecked angular motion or similar reduction in comfort. A further piece of information about the type of motion of the power tool is obtained by integrating the measuring signal. Consequently, the motion of the power tool may be analyzed more effectively with regard to ease of operation for the operator.
In particular, improved detection of a reduction in the ease of operation is achieved, when both the measuring signal of the acceleration sensor and the measuring signal of the rotation-rate sensor are used for detecting a motion of the power tool. For that purpose, e.g., different comparison values, threshold values or time characteristics of the comparison values or threshold values for the measuring signal of the acceleration sensor and the measuring signal of the rotation-rate sensor are stored for detecting a motion of the power tool and/or an unchecked angular motion or similar reduction in ease of operation. For example, a reduction in the ease of operation is only detected, when the measuring signal of the acceleration sensor and the integrated measuring signal of the acceleration sensor and the measuring signal of the rotation-rate sensor and the integrated measuring signal of the rotation-rate sensor satisfy specified values. Therefore, a reduction in the ease of operation is detected with a high level of precision.
In one further specific embodiment, in order to detect a reduction in the ease of operation, a measuring signal is acquired by the acceleration sensor in at least two moving directions pointing perpendicular to one another and is used for detecting a state of reduced ease of operation. Consequently, it is possible to measure the motion of the power tool more precisely.
In a schematic representation,
Power tool 1 also has a switch 5 as an operating device, through the manipulation of which the drive unit 3 may be switched on or off. In addition, a control unit 6 is provided, which detects the switching position of switch 5 and correspondingly controls drive unit 3 as a function of the switching position of switch 5. Furthermore, control unit 6 is connected to an acceleration sensor 7. Acceleration sensor 7 is situated in a handle 9, set apart as far as possible from an axis of rotation 10 of tool 2. Axis of rotation 10 runs along the longitudinal axis of drill 2. In addition, a rotation-rate sensor 8 is provided, which is also connected to control unit 6. Rotation-rate sensor 8 measures a rotation of power tool 1 as a measuring signal and passes it along to control unit 6. Depending on the specific embodiment selected, only an acceleration sensor or only a rotation-rate sensor may be provided. In addition, in a further specific embodiment, a rotation-rate sensor and an acceleration sensor may be provided. Furthermore, a plurality of acceleration sensors and/or rotation-rate sensors may be provided.
Acceleration sensor 7 is configured to measure an acceleration along an x-axis 11 and/or along a z-axis 12. X-axis 11 and z-axis 12 are perpendicular to one another and are represented schematically in
Furthermore, an integration unit 18 may be provided, which integrates the measuring signals of acceleration sensor 7 and/or of rotation-rate sensor 8 with respect to time after the filtering and passes these integrated measuring signals along to control unit 6.
In a schematic front view,
Acceleration sensor 7 is configured to measure the acceleration of power tool 1 along x-axis 11 and/or along z-axis 12. The measuring signals separated for the two axes 11, 12 are transmitted separately to control unit 6 via filter 13. Acceleration sensor 7 is preferably situated as far a distance as possible from axis of rotation 10. This provides sufficient separation of the useful signal in comparison with gravitational acceleration, which means that in comparison with the acceleration values of interest, gravitational acceleration may be disregarded. Consequently, an exact determination of and compensation for gravitational acceleration, e.g., by a high-pass filter, may be omitted.
The acceleration measured by the acceleration sensor results from the distance of acceleration sensor 7 to axis of rotation 10 and may be calculated using the following formula:
where the angular velocity is denoted by ω, the acceleration along the z axis is denoted by az, the distance of acceleration sensor 7 from axis of rotation 10 is denoted by r, and the time is denoted by t. A limiting value for a permissible acceleration of power tool 1 may be set on the basis of this formula. If the acceleration measured by acceleration sensor 7 exceeds the stipulated limiting value, then a reduction in the ease of operation is detected.
A further limiting value may be established by stipulating a time span, for which the limiting value of the acceleration must be exceeded before a reduction in the ease of operation is detected. The time span may be determined on the basis of a maximum rotational speed of drive unit 3 and the angle of rotation reasonable for a user. These data are stored, for example, in a memory 14 that is connected to control unit 6. If control unit 6 determines that one or more of the established limiting values are exceeded, then control unit 6 limits the electrical power output of drive unit 3 and/or decelerates drive unit 3 and/or cuts off the electrical power supply of drive unit 3.
Depending on the specific embodiment selected, a plurality of acceleration sensors 7 may also be provided, each acceleration sensor 7 acquiring a measuring signal for the x-axis and/or for the z-axis. In the specific embodiment described, the acquired measuring signals are filtered, for example, by a low-pass filter. Interference, as occurs, for example, in a percussion mode of the power tool, is suppressed by the low-pass filter. In this manner, the signal characteristic of the acquired measuring signal becomes more precise. A cutoff frequency of the low-pass filter may be individually adapted for each power tool. In particular, the cutoff frequency of the low-pass filter may be set as a function of the type of storage battery 4 used, in particular, as a function of the weight of storage battery 4.
Control unit 6 may execute the comparison of the transmitted measuring signals to the limiting values stored for them, itself. In addition, a separate evaluation circuit in analog or digital form may be provided, which executes the comparison of the acquired measuring signals to the established limiting values. In particular, a time characteristic of a measuring signal may also be specified as a limiting value. In addition, depending on the specific embodiment selected, acceleration sensor 7 may correspondingly have analog and/or digital circuits already, in order to compare the acquired measuring signal to the established limiting values. In this specific embodiment, acceleration sensor 7 transmits, for example, only one more information item to control unit 6, that a state of reduced ease of operation is present or not. Then, control unit 6 limits the power output of drive unit 3 further, for example, as a function of the existing information items regarding the state of reduced ease of operation.
For example, the storage batteries 4 used may differ in storage capacity, and consequently, in weight. For example, a storage battery 4 may have a weight of 1800 g or 1250 g or 330 g or 590 g. The power tool has different vibrational frequencies as a function of the weight of storage battery 4. Therefore, it is advantageous to consider the weight, that is, the type of storage battery 4, when selecting the filter characteristic for the filter. Control unit 6 selects different limiting values and/or different filter characteristics for filter 13, e.g., different cutoff frequencies, as a function of the type of storage battery, that is, as a function of the weight.
Power tool 1 may have an input unit 15, via which a type of storage battery 4 is input. In the simplest case, input unit 15 may take the form of a switch, which may be switched back and forth between two different weight types of the storage battery. For example, an information item about the weight of the type of storage battery 4 may be stored in memory 14. In addition, a detection circuit 16 may be provided on power tool 1, the detection circuit detecting the type of storage battery 4 and passing along a corresponding information item to control unit 6. In this case, an association of the type of storage battery 4 with a weight of storage battery 4 may also be stored in memory 14. Detection circuit 16 may detect, for example, a barcode of a storage battery 4, which contains the corresponding information for the type of storage battery 4. In addition, detection circuit 16 may be an electronic circuit, which reads a further memory 17 of storage battery 4; the type of storage battery 4 being stored in further memory 17.
With the aid of rotation-rate sensor 8, a rotation of power tool 1 is measured and passed on to control unit 6 via filter 13. Precise and reliable detection of an unchecked motion of the power tool, which constitutes a reduction in the ease of operation, is achieved by using an acceleration sensor and a rotation-rate sensor. For example, reduced ease of operation occurs when drill 2 jams during drilling and power tool 1 is rotated about axis of rotation 10 of drill 3. In an analogous manner, an abrasive disk of an angle grinder may also jam and cause the angle grinder to swivel.
Upon detection of an unchecked motion of the power tool, drive unit 3 is decelerated or switched off with the aid of control unit 6. With the aid of the described set-up, both very rapid and slow movements of the power tool may be detected and taken into account. Rapid movements of power tool 1 occur, for example, when a metric screw is tightened. The metric screw may be screwed in very easily. However, when the screw head rests on top, the screw jams abruptly. This may cause the power tool to accelerate in a direction opposite to the direction of rotation of the drive unit and in this manner, to execute an unchecked motion.
Slow movements of the power tool may occur, for example, when long wood screws are screwed in. When the long wood screws are screwed in, the locking torque builds up slowly and continuously. When the locking torque exceeds the strength of the user, the power tool starts to rotate slowly in a direction opposite to the direction of rotation of the drive unit. In this case, an unchecked motion may also be executed if the user does not switch off power tool 1 in a timely manner.
In control unit 6, the measuring signals of acceleration sensor 7 and/or rotation-rate sensor 8 may be conditioned and processed in different ways, which are explained in light of the following
In addition, in a succeeding method step 240, a repeated integration with respect to time may be carried out. In programming step 240, the repeated integration with respect to time yields a location or an angle of rotation for power tool 1. At a following programming point 250, a comparison to a comparison value is executed once more by control unit 6. In this case, a limiting value for a maximum angle of rotation is provided. At programming point 250, if the comparison reveals that the calculated angle of rotation is greater than the stored comparison angle of rotation, then a state of poor ease of operation is detected. By taking the angle of rotation into account, slow movements of the power tool, which could likewise result in a poor ease of operation, may also be detected.
If control unit 6 determines that the specified threshold value for the selected time period is exceeded, then a state of reduced ease of operation is detected. In response to detection of the reduced ease of operation, drive unit 3 is decelerated, and/or its power output is reduced, or it is switched off.
Of the methods described in
In order to prevent possible instances of false activation due to intense vibrations during use in percussion drilling, for example, individual methods may also be combined with one another. Thus, for example, the power tool can only be switched off, when the method of
In addition to, or as an alternative to the rotation-rate sensor, a magnetic field sensor may also be used. The measured values of the magnetic field sensor may be evaluated in the same manner as the measured values of the rotation-rate sensor.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2013 200 602 | Jan 2013 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5476014 | Lampe | Dec 1995 | A |
5914882 | Yeghiazarians | Jun 1999 | A |
6311786 | Giardino | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6490930 | Ohkubo | Dec 2002 | B1 |
8479963 | Kitagawa | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20020020538 | Giardino | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030006051 | Schmitzer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040011632 | Hellmann | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040134686 | Burrows | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040211573 | Carrier | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050161241 | Frauhammer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060185869 | Arimura | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070035311 | Wuersch | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080163504 | Smith | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080190988 | Pedicini | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090236387 | Simonelli | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100001017 | Herman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110114345 | Schlesak | May 2011 | A1 |
20120279742 | Roser | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130300333 | Sako | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140216773 | Steurer | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150158170 | Nitsche | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150375147 | Cai | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160049817 | Karlsson | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160286111 | Suwa | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101 03 142 | Jul 2002 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140196920 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |