The present disclosure is generally related to emergency cots, and is specifically directed to powered roll-in cots.
There is a variety of emergency cots in use today. Such emergency cots may be designed to transport and load bariatric patients into an ambulance.
For example, the PROFlexX® cot, by Ferno-Washington, Inc. of Wilmington, Ohio U.S.A., is a manually actuated cot that may provide stability and support for loads of about 700 pounds (about 317.5 kg). The PROFlexX® cot includes a patient support portion that is attached to a wheeled undercarriage. The wheeled under carriage includes an X-frame geometry that can be transitioned between nine selectable positions. One recognized advantage of such a cot design is that the X-frame provides minimal flex and a low center of gravity at all of the selectable positions. Another recognized advantage of such a cot design is that the selectable positions may provide better leverage for manually lifting and loading bariatric patients.
Another example of a cot designed for bariatric patients, is the POWERFlexx® Powered Cot, by Ferno-Washington, Inc. The POWERFlexx® Powered Cot includes a battery powered actuator that may provide sufficient power to lift loads of about 700 pounds (about 317.5 kg). One recognized advantage of such a cot design is that the cot may lift a bariatric patient up from a low position to a higher position, i.e., an operator may have reduced situations that require lifting the patient.
A further variety is a multipurpose roll-in emergency cot having a patient support stretcher that is removably attached to a wheeled undercarriage or transporter. The patient support stretcher when removed for separate use from the transporter may be shuttled around horizontally upon an included set of wheels. One recognized advantage of such a cot design is that the stretcher may be separately rolled into an emergency vehicle such as station wagons, vans, modular ambulances, aircrafts, or helicopters, where space and reducing weight is a premium.
Another advantage of such a cot design is that the separated stretcher may be more easily carried over uneven terrain and out of locations where it is impractical to use a complete cot to transfer a patient. Example of such prior art cots can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,037,871, 4,921,295, and International Publication No. WO01701611.
Although the foregoing multipurpose roll-in emergency cots have been generally adequate for their intended purposes, they have not been satisfactory in all aspects. For example, the foregoing emergency cots are loaded into ambulances according to loading processes that require at least one operator to support the load of the cot for a portion of the respective loading process.
The embodiments described herein address are directed to a versatile multipurpose roll-in emergency cot which may provide improved management of the cot weight, improved balance, and/or easier loading at any cot height, while being rollable into various types of rescue vehicles, such as ambulances, vans, station wagons, aircrafts and helicopters.
According to one embodiment, In one embodiment, a roll-in cot can include a support frame, a back carriage member, a pair of back legs, a pair of front legs and a cot actuation system. The support frame can include a front end and a back end. The back carriage member can be slidingly engaged with the support frame. The pair of back legs can be rotatably coupled to the back carriage member. Each of the pair of back legs can include a wheel linkage and a back wheel coupled to the wheel linkage. Each of the pair of back legs can define a back leg span that extends from the back carriage member through the wheel linkage. The pair of front legs can be slidingly coupled to the support frame. Each of the pair of front legs can include a front wheel and an intermediate load wheel having an axis of rotation. The intermediate span can be demarcated by the axis of rotation of the intermediate load wheel and the back carriage member. The cot actuation system can include a front actuator that moves the pair of front legs and a back actuator that moves the pair of back legs. The front actuator can retract the pair of front legs such that the intermediate load wheel is supported by a loading surface. The back actuator can retract the pair of back legs such that the back wheel is supported by a lower surface. The lower surface can be lower than the loading surface. A back leg angle Θ can be formed between the back leg span and the intermediate span. The back leg angle Θ can be an acute angle.
According to another embodiment, a roll-in cot may include a support frame, a pair of back legs, a pair of front legs, and a cot actuation system. The support frame may include a front end, and a back end. The pair of back legs can be slidingly coupled to the support frame. The pair of front legs can be slidingly coupled to the support frame. Each of the pair of front legs can include a front wheel and an intermediate load wheel. The intermediate load wheel is offset from the front wheel by a load wheel distance. The cot actuation system can include a front actuator that moves the pair of front legs and a back actuator that moves the pair of back legs. The front actuator can raise the pair of front legs such that the front wheel and the intermediate load wheel of each of the pair of front legs are aligned along a loading level. The intermediate load wheel of each of the pair of front legs can be offset, along the loading level, from the pair of back legs by a loading span. The load wheel distance can be greater than the loading span.
According to yet another embodiment, a roll-in cot can include a support frame, a pair of legs slidingly and pivotally engaged with the support frame, and an actuator coupled to the pair of legs. The actuator can be operable to actuate the pair of legs such that the pair of legs slide and rotate with respect to the support frame. A method for actuating the roll-in cot can include receiving from an actuator sensor, automatically with a processor, a load signal indicative of a force acting upon or exerted by the actuator. A control signal indicative of a command to change a height of the roll-in cot can be received. The actuator can be caused to actuate the pair of legs relatively slowly. The actuator can be determined, automatically with the processor, to be unloaded based upon the load signal. The actuator can be caused, automatically with the processor, to actuate the pair of legs at a higher rate. The pair of legs can be actuated at the higher rate after the actuator is determined to be unloaded.
According to a further embodiment, a roll-in cot can include a support frame, a pair of front legs, a pair of back legs, a pair of back hinge members, and a cot actuation system. The support frame can include a front end, and a back end. The pair of front legs can be slidingly coupled to the support frame. The pair of back legs can be slidingly coupled to the support frame. Each of the pair of back legs can include a sinuous internal edge that faces the front end of the support frame. The sinuous internal edge can form an upper angle β. The upper angle β can be an obtuse angle. Each of the pair of back hinge members can be pivotingly coupled to the support frame at a first end and pivotingly coupled to one of the pair of back legs at a second end. The upper angle β of the sinuous internal edge can be located above the second end of one of the pair of back hinge members. The cot actuation system can include a front actuator that moves the pair of front legs and a back actuator that moves the pair of back legs.
According to a further embodiment, a roll-in cot can include a support frame, a pair of front legs, a pair of back legs, and a cot actuation system. The support frame can include a front end, and a back end. The front end can include a pair of front load wheels. The pair of back legs can be slidingly coupled to the support frame. The pair of front legs can be slidingly coupled to the support frame. Each of the front legs can include a front wheel and an intermediate load wheel. The cot actuation system can include a front actuator that moves the pair of front legs and a back actuator that moves the pair of back legs. When the pair of front legs is retracted towards the support frame, the roll-in cot can be configured to be load balanced forward of the intermediate load wheel.
These and additional features provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure will be more fully understood in view of the following detailed description, in conjunction with the drawings.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present disclosures can be best understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
The embodiments set forth in the drawings are illustrative in nature and not intended to be limiting of the embodiments described herein. Moreover, individual features of the drawings and embodiments will be more fully apparent and understood in view of the detailed description.
Referring to
Referring collectively to
Referring collectively to
Referring again to
In specific embodiments, the front legs 20 and the back legs 40 may each be coupled to the lateral side members 15. Referring to
As shown in
In one embodiment, the front wheels 26 and back wheels 46 may be swivel caster wheels or swivel locked wheels. As is described below, as the roll-in cot 10 is raised and/or lowered, the front wheels 26 and back wheels 46 may be synchronized to ensure that the plane of the roll-in cot 10 and the plane of the wheels 26, 46 are substantially parallel. For example, the back wheels 46 may each be coupled to a back wheel linkage 47 and the front wheels 26 may each be coupled to a front wheel linkage 27. As the roll-in cot 10 is raised and/or lowered, the front wheel linkages 27 and the back wheel linkages 47 may be rotated to control the plane of the wheels 26, 46.
A locking mechanism (not depicted) may be disposed in one of the front wheel linkages 27 and the back wheel linkages 47 to allow an operator to selectively enable and/or disable wheel direction locking. In one embodiment, a locking mechanism is coupled to one of the front wheels 26 and/or one of the back wheels 46. The locking mechanism transitions the wheels 26, 46 between a swiveling state and a directionally locked state. For example, in a swiveling state the wheels 26, 46 may be allowed to swivel freely which enables the roll-in cot 10 to be easily rotated. In the directionally locked state, the wheels 26, 46 may be actuated by an actuator (e.g., a solenoid actuator, a remotely operated servomechanism and the like) into a straight orientation, i.e., the front wheels 26 are oriented and locked in a straight direction and the back wheels 46 swivel freely such that an operator pushing from the back end 19 would direct the roll-in cot 10 forward.
Referring again to
Referring to
The front actuator 16 and the back actuator 18 are operable to actuate the front legs 20 and back legs 40, simultaneously or independently. As shown in
Any actuator suitable to raise and lower the support frame 12 as well as retract the front legs 20 and back legs 40 is contemplated herein. As depicted in
In one embodiment, schematically depicted in
In the depicted embodiment, the dual piggy back hydraulic actuator comprises a rigid support frame 180 that is substantially “H” shaped (i.e., two vertical portions connected by a cross portion). The rigid support frame 180 comprises a cross member 182 that is coupled to two vertical members 184 at about the middle of each of the two vertical members 184. A pump motor 160 and a fluid reservoir 162 are coupled to the cross member 182 and in fluid communication. In one embodiment, the pump motor 160 and the fluid reservoir 162 are disposed on opposite sides of the cross member 182 (e.g., the fluid reservoir 162 disposed above the pump motor 160). Specifically, the pump motor 160 may be a brushed bi-rotational electric motor with a peak output of about 1400 watts. The rigid support frame 180 may include additional cross members or a backing plate to provide further rigidity and resist motion of the vertical members 184 with respect to the cross member 182 during actuation.
Each vertical member 184 comprises a pair of piggy backed hydraulic cylinders (i.e., a first hydraulic cylinder and a second hydraulic cylinder or a third hydraulic cylinder and a fourth hydraulic cylinder) wherein the first cylinder extends a rod in a first direction and the second cylinder extends a rod in a substantially opposite direction. When the cylinders are arranged in one master-slave configuration, one of the vertical members 184 comprises an upper master cylinder 168 and a lower master cylinder 268. The other of the vertical members 184 comprises an upper slave cylinder 169 and a lower slave cylinder 269. It is noted that, while master cylinders 168, 268 are piggy backed together and extend rods 165, 265 in substantially opposite directions, master cylinders 168, 268 may be located in alternate vertical members 184 and/or extend rods 165, 265 in substantially the same direction.
Referring now to
Referring back to
While the cot actuation system is typically powered, the cot actuation system may also comprise a manual release component (e.g., a button, tension member, switch, linkage or lever) configured to allow an operator to raise or lower the front and back actuators 16, 18 manually. In one embodiment, the manual release component disconnects the drive units of the front and back actuators 16, 18 to facilitate manual operation. Thus, for example, the wheels 26,46 may remain in contact with the ground when the drive units are disconnected and the roll-in cot 10 is manually raised. The manual release component may be disposed at various positions on the roll-in cot 10, for example, on the back end 19 or on the side of the roll-in cot 10.
To determine whether the roll-in cot 10 is level, sensors (not depicted) may be utilized to measure distance and/or angle. For example, the front actuator 16 and the back actuator 18 may each comprise encoders which determine the length of each actuator. In one embodiment, the encoders are real time encoders which are operable to detect movement of the total length of the actuator or the change in length of the actuator when the cot is powered or unpowered (i.e., manual control). While various encoders are contemplated, the encoder, in one commercial embodiment, may be the optical encoders produced by Midwest Motion Products, Inc. of Watertown, Minn. U.S.A. In other embodiments, the cot comprises angular sensors that measure actual angle or change in angle such as, for example, potentiometer rotary sensors, hall effect rotary sensors and the like. The angular sensors can be operable to detect the angles of any of the pivotingly coupled portions of the front legs 20 and/or the back legs 40. In one embodiment, angular sensors are operably coupled to the front legs 20 and the back legs 40 to detect the difference between the angle of the front leg 20 and the angle of the back leg 40 (angle delta). A loading state angle may be set to an angle such as about 20° or any other angle that generally indicates that the roll-in cot 10 is in a loading state (indicative of loading and/or unloading). Thus, when the angle delta exceeds the loading state angle the roll-in cot 10 may detect that it is in a loading state and perform certain actions dependent upon being in the loading state.
It is noted that the term “sensor,” as used herein, means a device that measures a physical quantity and converts it into a signal which is correlated to the measured value of the physical quantity. Furthermore, the term “signal” means an electrical, magnetic or optical waveform, such as current, voltage, flux, DC, AC, sinusoidal-wave, triangular-wave, square-wave, and the like, capable of being transmitted from one location to another.
Referring now to
Referring to
In a further embodiment, multiple front load wheel sensors may be in series, such that the front load wheel sensors are activated only when both front load wheels 70 are within a definable range of the loading surface 500 (i.e., distance may be set to indicate that the front load wheels 70 are in contact with a surface). As used in this context, “activated” means that the front load wheel sensors send a signal to the control box 50 that the front load wheels 70 are both above the loading surface 500. Ensuring that both front load wheels 70 are on the loading surface 500 may be important, especially in circumstances when the roll-in cot 10 is loaded into an ambulance at an incline.
In the embodiments described herein, the control box 50 comprises or is operably coupled to a processor and a memory. The processor may be an integrated circuit, a microchip, a computer, or any other computing device capable of executing machine readable instructions. The electronic memory may be RAM, ROM, a flash memory, a hard drive, or any device capable of storing machine readable instructions. Additionally, it is noted that distance sensors may be coupled to any portion of the roll-in cot 10 such that the distance between a lower surface and components such as, for example, the front end 17, the back end 19, the front load wheels 70, the front wheels 26, the intermediate load wheels 30, the back wheels 46, the front actuator 16 or the back actuator 18 may be determined.
In further embodiments, the roll-in cot 10 has the capability to communicate with other devices (e.g., an ambulance, a diagnostic system, a cot accessory, or other medical equipment). For example, the control box 50 may comprise or may be operably coupled to a communication member operable to transmit and receive a communication signal. The communication signal may be a signal that complies with Controller Area Network (CAN) protocol, Bluetooth protocol, ZigBee protocol, or any other communication protocol.
The front end 17 may also comprise a hook engagement bar 80, which is typically disposed between the front load wheels 70, and is operable to swivel forward and backward. While the hook engagement bar 80 of
Referring still to
Additionally as shown in
By coupling carriage tension members 120 both of the front carriage members 28 and both of the back carriage members 48, the pulley system ensures parallel movement of the front legs 20 or back legs 40, reduces side to side rocking of the support frame 12, and reduces bending within the lateral side members 15. The pulley system may have the additional benefit of providing a timing system which ensures that movements of opposite sides of the roll-in cot 10 are synchronized (e.g., each of the front legs 20, each of the back legs 40, and/or other components). The timing system may be achieved by arranging carriage tension members 120 and pulleys 122 in the embodiment depicted in
Referring now to
In further embodiments, both of the front legs 20 can comprise a timing belt and gear system 201. In such embodiments, raising or lowering the front end 17 of the support frame 12 by the front legs 20 trigger the rotation of the front wheel linkage 27. Additionally, the back legs 40 may comprise a timing belt and gear system 201, wherein the raising or lowering of the back end 19 of the support frame 12 by the back legs 40 triggers the rotation of the back wheel linkage 47. Specifically, rotation of the back hinge member 44 with respect to the back leg 40 around the axis of rotation 136 can cause the back wheel linkage 47 with respect to the back leg 40 around the axis of rotation 134. Thus in embodiments where each of the front legs 20 and the back legs 40 comprise a timing belt and gear system 201, the front wheels 26 and back wheels 46 can be rotated to ensure that the front wheels 26 and back wheels 46 can roll across surfaces at various cot heights. Thus, the roll-in cot 10 may be rolled side to side at any height when the support frame 12 is substantially parallel to the ground, i.e., the front legs 20 and the back legs 40 are actuated to substantially the same length.
Referring again to
Referring to
As an alternative to the hand control embodiment, the control box 50 may also include a component which may be used to raise and lower the roll-in cot 10. In one embodiment, the component is a toggle switch 52, which is able to raise (+) or lower (−) the cot. Other buttons, switches, or knobs are also suitable. Due to the integration of the sensors in the roll-in cot 10, as is explained in greater detail herein, the toggle switch 52 may be used to control the front legs 20 or back legs 40 which are operable to be raised, lowered, retracted or released depending on the position of the roll-in cot 10. In one embodiment the toggle switch is analog (i.e., the pressure and/or displacement of the analog switch is proportional to the speed of actuation). The operator controls may comprise a visual display component 58 configured to inform an operator whether the front and back actuators 16, 18 are activated or deactivated, and thereby may be raised, lowered, retracted or released. While the operator controls are disposed at the back end 19 of the roll-in cot 10 in the present embodiments, it is further contemplated that the operator controls be positioned at alternative positions on the support frame 12, for example, on the front end 17 or the sides of the support frame 12. In still further embodiments, the operator controls may be located in a removably attachable wireless remote control that may control the roll-in cot 10 without physical attachment to the roll-in cot 10.
In other embodiments as shown in
Turning now to embodiments of the roll-in cot 10 being simultaneously actuated, the cot of
Referring collectively to
The embodiments described herein may be utilized to lift a patient from a position below a vehicle in preparation for loading a patient into the vehicle (e.g., from the ground to above a loading surface of an ambulance). Specifically, the roll-in cot 10 may be raised from the lowest transport position (
The roll-in cot 10 may be lowered from an intermediate transport position (
In one embodiment, when the roll-in cot 10 is in the highest transport position (
In another embodiment, any time the roll-in cot 10 is raised over the highest transport position for a set period of time (e.g., 30 seconds), the control box 50 provides an indication that the roll-in cot 10 has exceeded the highest transport position and the roll-in cot 10 needs to be lowered. The indication may be visual, audible, electronic or combinations thereof.
When the roll-in cot 10 is in the lowest transport position (
The front actuator 16 is operable to raise or lower a front end 17 of the support frame 12 independently of the back actuator 18. The back actuator 18 is operable to raise or lower a back end 19 of the support frame 12 independently of the front actuator 16. By raising the front end 17 or back end 19 independently, the roll-in cot 10 is able to maintain the support frame 12 level or substantially level when the roll-in cot 10 is moved over uneven surfaces, for example, a staircase or hill. Specifically, if one of the front legs 20 or the back legs 40 is in tension, the set of legs not in contact with a surface (i.e., the set of legs that is in tension) is activated by the roll-in cot 10 (e.g., moving the roll-in cot 10 off of a curb). Further embodiments of the roll-in cot 10 are operable to be automatically leveled. For example, if back end 19 is lower than the front end 17, pressing the “+” on toggle switch 52 raises the back end 19 to level prior to raising the roll-in cot 10, and pressing the “−” on toggle switch 52 lowers the front end 17 to level prior to lowering the roll-in cot 10.
In one embodiment, depicted in
Referring collectively to
As is depicted in
Additionally, in such a position, the front actuator 16 is in tension and the back actuator 18 is in compression. Thus, for example, if the “−” on toggle switch 52 is activated, the front legs 20 are raised (
After the front legs 20 have been retracted, the roll-in cot 10 may be urged forward until the intermediate load wheels 30 have been loaded onto the loading surface 500 (
It is noted that, the middle portion of the roll-in cot 10 is above the loading surface 500 when any portion of the roll-in cot 10 that may act as a fulcrum is sufficiently beyond the loading edge 502 such that the back legs 40 may be retracted a reduced amount of force is required to lift the back end 19 (e.g., less than half of the weight of the roll-in cot 10, which may be loaded, needs to be supported at the back end 19). Furthermore, it is noted that the detection of the location of the roll-in cot 10 may be accomplished by sensors located on the roll-in cot 10 and/or sensors on or adjacent to the loading surface 500. For example, an ambulance may have sensors that detect the positioning of the roll-in cot 10 with respect to the loading surface 500 and/or loading edge 502 and communications means to transmit the information to the roll-in cot 10.
Referring to
Once the cot is loaded onto the loading surface (
Referring collectively to
When the roll-in cot 10 is properly positioned with respect to the loading edge 502, the back legs 40 can be extended (
When a sensor detects that the front legs 20 are clear of the loading surface 500 (
Referring back to
Referring collectively to
Referring now to
Referring now to
As is described in greater detail above, during loading or unloading, the intermediate load wheel 30, the front wheel 26 and the front load wheel 70 can be in contact with the loading surface 500. Accordingly, the outer diameters of the intermediate load wheel 30, the front wheel 26 and the front load wheel 70 can be substantially aligned. The loading level 504 can be defined by the alignment of the outer diameters of the intermediate load wheel 30, the front wheel 26, the front load wheel 70, the loading surface 500, or any combination thereof. The back leg span 38 of the back leg 40 can be configured to form a loading angle α with respect to the loading level 504. In embodiments where the loading level 504 is substantially parallel to the support frame 12 of the roll-in cot 10, the back leg span 38 of the back leg 40 can be configured to form the loading angle α with respect to the support frame 12 of the roll-in cot 10. In some embodiments, the loading angle α can be substantially acute such as, for example, less than about 85° (about 1.48 radians) in one embodiment, between about 75° (about 1.31 radians) and about 40° (about 0.70 radians) in another embodiment, or between about 60° (about 1.05 radians) and about 45° (about 0.79 radians) in a further embodiment.
As is noted above, the arrangement of back leg 40 with respect to the front leg 20 can enhance the balance of the roll-in cot 10 during loading and unloading. For example, when the intermediate load wheel 30, the front wheel 26 and the front load wheel 70 are aligned along the loading level 504, the intermediate load wheel 30 can be offset from the back leg 40 by a loading span 506. The loading span 506 can be measured along the loading level 504 between an axis of rotation 31 of the intermediate load wheel 30 (e.g., a wheel axle) and the back leg 40.
Referring collectively to
Referring again to
According to the embodiments described herein, the roll-in cot 10 can be configured to be load balanced towards the front end 17 of the roll-in cot 10. As used herein, the phrase “configured to be load balanced” refers to a center of gravity of a cot-patient combination. As used herein the phrase “cot-patient combination” can mean the resultant combination of the roll-in cot 10 and an anthropomorphic test device 508 such that the top of the head of the anthropomorphic test device 508 is in line with the center of the front load wheel 70. Additionally, it is noted that the phrase “anthropomorphic test device” refers to a 95th Percentile Adult Male Hybrid III Dummy as defined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The anthropomorphic test device 508 can be supported directly by the support frame 12 or indirectly via patient supporting structure, which is in turn supported by the support frame 12. In some embodiments, the roll-in cot 10 can be configured to be load balanced forward (i.e., towards the front end 17 of the roll-in cot 10) with respect to the intermediate load wheel 30, when the front leg 20 of the roll-in cot 10 is retracted towards the support frame 12. Examples of the front leg 20 being retracted towards the support frame are depicted in
Referring now to
In some embodiments, the sinuous internal edge 144 of the back leg 40 can comprise an upper angle β formed between the first edge segment 146 and the second edge segment 147. The upper angle β can be configured such that extension of the back leg 40 imparts an unloading force 510 upon the roll-in cot 10. Specifically, as the back leg 40 extends, the sinuous internal edge 144 of the back leg 40 can contact (depicted in
Alternatively or additionally, the sinuous internal edge 144 of the back leg 40 can comprise a lower angle φ formed between the second edge segment 147 and the third edge segment 148. The lower angle φ can be configured to provide clearance between the back leg 40 and the loading edge 502, when the back leg 40 is fully extended. The lower angle φ can be a reflex angle such as, for example, between about 185° (about 3.23 radians) and about 240° (about 4.19 radians) in one embodiment, or between about 195° (about 3.40 radians) and about 230° (about 4.01 radians) in another embodiment, or between about 205° (about 3.58 radians) and about 220° (about 3.84 radians) in a further embodiment.
In embodiments where the sinuous internal edge 144 comprises both the upper angle β and the lower angle φ, the upper angle β and the lower angle φ can be defined in combination such that the intersection between the back hinge member 44 and the back leg 40 is disposed substantially in line with the back leg span 38. In some embodiments, the upper angle β can be located above the axis of rotation 136 of the back hinge member 44. For example, the upper angle β can be closer to the support frame 12 than the axis of rotation 136 of the back hinge member 44 as measured along the back leg span 38. Alternatively or additionally, and the lower angle φ can be located below the axis of rotation 136 of the back hinge member 44. For example, the lower angle φ can be further from the support frame 12 than the axis of rotation 136 of the back hinge member 44 as measured along the back leg span 38. Accordingly, the upper angle β of the sinuous internal edge 144 can be located above the lower angle φ of the sinuous internal edge 144.
It should now be understood that the embodiments described herein may be utilized to transport patients of various sizes by coupling a support surface such as a patient support surface to the support frame. For example, a lift-off stretcher or an incubator may be removably coupled to the support frame. Therefore, the embodiments described herein may be utilized to load and transport patients ranging from infants to bariatric patients. Furthermore the embodiments described herein, may be loaded onto and/or unloaded from an ambulance by an operator holding a single button to actuate the independently articulating legs (e.g., pressing the “−” on the toggle switch to load the cot onto an ambulance or pressing the “+” on the toggle switch to unload the cot from an ambulance). Specifically, the roll-in cot 10 may receive an input signal such as from the operator controls. The input signal may be indicative of a first direction or a second direction (i.e., lower or raise). The pair of front legs and the pair of back legs may be lowered independently when the signal is indicative of the first direction or may be raised independently when the signal is indicative of the second direction.
It is further noted that terms like “preferably,” “generally,” “commonly,” and “typically” are not utilized herein to limit the scope of the claimed embodiments or to imply that certain features are critical, essential, or even important to the structure or function of the claimed embodiments. Rather, these terms are merely intended to highlight alternative or additional features that may or may not be utilized in a particular embodiment of the present disclosure.
For the purposes of describing and defining the present disclosure it is additionally noted that the term “substantially” is utilized herein to represent the inherent degree of uncertainty that may be attributed to any quantitative comparison, value, measurement, or other representation. The term “substantially” is also utilized herein to represent the degree by which a quantitative representation may vary from a stated reference without resulting in a change in the basic function of the subject matter at issue.
Having provided reference to specific embodiments, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the present disclosure defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present disclosure are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present disclosure is not necessarily limited to these preferred aspects of any specific embodiment.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/245,107, filed Apr. 4, 2014, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/520,627, filed Dec. 21, 2012, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2011/021069, filed Jan. 13, 2011, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/294,658, filed Jan. 13, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2203204 | Nicolai | Jun 1940 | A |
2204205 | Bell | Jun 1940 | A |
2278749 | Todd | Apr 1942 | A |
2642250 | Kasnowich | Jun 1953 | A |
3397912 | Beaufort | Aug 1968 | A |
3544163 | Krein | Dec 1970 | A |
3612606 | Swenson | Oct 1971 | A |
3631546 | Eliasson | Jan 1972 | A |
3880770 | Chenot et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3951452 | Harder | Apr 1976 | A |
4037871 | Bourgraf et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4073538 | Hunter | Feb 1978 | A |
4155588 | Danziger et al. | May 1979 | A |
4186905 | Brudy | Feb 1980 | A |
4225183 | Hanagan et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4270798 | Harder | Jun 1981 | A |
4466664 | Kondou | Aug 1984 | A |
D289992 | Schrager | May 1987 | S |
4682810 | Zarka | Jul 1987 | A |
4745647 | Goodwin | May 1988 | A |
4761841 | Larsen | Aug 1988 | A |
4767148 | Ferneau et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4829633 | Kassner et al. | May 1989 | A |
4921295 | Stollenwerk | May 1990 | A |
5015024 | Bloemer | May 1991 | A |
5023968 | Diehl et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5039118 | Huang | Aug 1991 | A |
5056805 | Wang | Oct 1991 | A |
5062179 | Huang | Nov 1991 | A |
5069465 | Stryker et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5084922 | Louit | Feb 1992 | A |
5088136 | Stryker et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5168601 | Liu | Dec 1992 | A |
5265969 | Chuang | Nov 1993 | A |
5431087 | Kambara | Jul 1995 | A |
5509159 | Du | Apr 1996 | A |
5537700 | Way et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5586346 | Stacy et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5630428 | Wallace | May 1997 | A |
5720057 | Duncan | Feb 1998 | A |
5774914 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5839136 | Vance et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5867911 | Yates et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5971091 | Kamen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5996954 | Rosen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6311952 | Bainter | Nov 2001 | B2 |
D454319 | Ito | Mar 2002 | S |
6405393 | Megown | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6503018 | Hou et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6550801 | Newhard | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565111 | Ageneau | May 2003 | B2 |
6578922 | Khedira | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6654973 | Van Den Heuvel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6735794 | Way et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6752462 | Kain et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6789292 | Oshima et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6948197 | Chen | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6976696 | O'Krangley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7003829 | Choi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7013510 | Johnson | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7273256 | Jane Santamaria | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278338 | Chen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7389552 | Reed et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7424758 | Broadley et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426970 | Olsen | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7568766 | Chen et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7617569 | Liao | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621003 | Myers et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
D606910 | Malassigne et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
7631373 | Broadley et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7631575 | Gard et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637550 | Menna | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641211 | Ivanchenko | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7841611 | Ivanchenko | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7857393 | Cebula et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7941881 | Hayes et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7996939 | Benedict et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8051513 | Reed et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8056950 | Souke et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8085695 | Kushalnagar et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8100307 | Chinn et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8155918 | Reed et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8240410 | Heimbrock et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8439416 | Lambarth et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8459679 | Jessie, Jr. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
RE44884 | Lambarth | May 2014 | E |
8714612 | Chinn | May 2014 | B2 |
8898862 | McGrath | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8901747 | Miller et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
D729132 | Valentino et al. | May 2015 | S |
D729702 | Valentino | May 2015 | S |
9021634 | Goto et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
D742794 | Valentino et al. | Nov 2015 | S |
D749014 | Valentino et al. | Feb 2016 | S |
9248062 | Valentino et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
D751000 | Dietz et al. | Mar 2016 | S |
20020056162 | Flynn et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020174486 | Heuvel et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030025378 | Lin | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030172459 | Roussy | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040088792 | O'Krangley et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111798 | Matunaga et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050126835 | Lenkman | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050283911 | Roussy | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060017263 | Chen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060075558 | Lambarth et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082176 | Broadley et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060096029 | Osborne et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060225203 | Hosoya et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265807 | Choy et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070163044 | Arnold et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070163045 | Becker et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165044 | Wells et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080128571 | Dostaler et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080211248 | Lambarth | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090165208 | Reed et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172883 | Benedict et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222988 | Reed et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090313758 | Menkedick et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100306921 | Kramer | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110080016 | Lambarth | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087416 | Patmore | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110260417 | Bitzer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265262 | Di Lauro et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110266821 | Goto et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277773 | Sullivan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120275896 | Magill et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130168987 | Valentino et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140059768 | Lemire et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140276269 | Illindala | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
353436 | Aug 2014 | AU |
354706 | Aug 2014 | AU |
102781392 | Nov 2012 | CN |
29721734 | Mar 1998 | DE |
1698314 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2412355 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2695553 | Mar 1994 | FR |
2351439 | Jan 2001 | GB |
02200262 | Aug 1990 | JP |
2001197962 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002543927 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2006208887 | Aug 2006 | JP |
8901747 | Feb 1991 | NL |
0069386 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2005049607 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2007128744 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2011088169 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Australian Examination Report for Registration No. 353436 dated Jul. 30, 2015. |
Australian Examination Report for Registration No. 354687 dated Oct. 2, 2014. |
Canadian Examiner's Report pertaining to Design Patent Application 154348 dated May 13, 2014. |
Canadian Examiner's Report pertaining to Design Patent Application 154349 dated May 13, 2014. |
Canadian Examiner's Report pertaining to Design Patent Application 154350 dated May 13, 2014. |
Canadian Examiner's Report pertaining to Design Patent Application 154351 dated May 13, 2014. |
Canadian Office Action pertaining to Application No. 2,786,442 dated Nov. 3, 2015. |
Chinese Office Action pertaining to Application No. 201180011448.8 dated Aug. 14, 2014. |
Chinese Office Action pertaining to Application No. 201180011448.8 dated Jun. 30, 2015. |
Election/Restriction Requirement pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/520,627 dated Nov. 3, 2014. |
Election/Restriction Requirement pertaining to Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/458,151 dated May 6, 2015. |
European Extended Search Report pertaining to Application No. 11733348.4 dated Feb. 17, 2015. |
European Search Report pertaining to Application No. 13860406.1 dated Jun. 14, 2016. |
Final Rejection pertaining to Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/442,947 dated Apr. 22, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion pertaining to PCT/US2013/073005 dated Apr. 28, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion pertaining to PCT/US2011/021069 dated May 25, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion pertaining to PCT/US2013/051271 dated Jan. 15, 2014. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees pertaining to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/065649 dated Feb. 26, 2015. |
Japanese Examination Report pertaining to Application No. 2012-549057 dated Oct. 28, 2014. |
Japanese Office Action pertaining to Application No. 2015-091551 dated Feb. 4, 2016. |
Korean Preliminary Rejection pertaining to Design Application No. 30-2013-0063154 dated Sep. 2, 2014. |
Korean Preliminary Rejection pertaining to Design Application No. 30-2013-0063155 dated Sep. 2, 2014. |
Korean Preliminary Rejection pertaining to Design Application No. 30-2013-0063157 dated Sep. 2, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance pertaining to Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/442,947 dated Jul. 16, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/520,627 dated Jul. 16, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/520,627 dated Sep. 15, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/414,812 dated Aug. 4, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/414,812 dated Oct. 7, 2015. |
Office Action pertaining to Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/442,947 dated Oct. 1, 2014. |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/520,627 dated Feb. 11, 2015. |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/245,107 dated Nov. 13, 2015. |
Office Action pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/649,260 dated Feb. 9, 2016. |
Search Report pertaining to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/065649 dated May 22, 2015. |
Written Opinion of International Preliminary Exam pertaining to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/065649 dated Jan. 18, 2016. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability pertaining to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/065649 dated Jun. 13, 2016. |
Google search: “timing belt purpose of idler pulley”, Dec. 8, 2016 (2 pages) http://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=timing+belt+purpose+of+idler+pulley. |
Timing Belt Idler, Dec. 8, 2016, from Repair Pal (5 pages) http://repairpal.com/timing-belt-idler. |
Tensioner from Wikipedia, Dec. 8, 2016 (4 pages) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensioner. |
“Timing Belt Tensioner”, Automotive Care Wayback Machine—Internet Archive: archived from Dec. 29, 2014 http://web.archive.org/web/20141229221712/http://www.automotivecare.com/your-engine-101/belts-and-tensioners/. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 14/770,126, 43 pages. |
Office Action pertaining to Chinese Application No. 201380070062.3, filed Dec. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated May 26, 2017 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 15/036,983, 41 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170042749 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61294658 | Jan 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14245107 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 15335865 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13520627 | US | |
Child | 14245107 | US |