1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an apparatus for reducing the risk of damage to buildings as a result of lateral forces applied to the building and, in particular, concerns a pre-assembled internal shear panel that can be installed into a building wall to reduce the risk of the building wall becoming dislodged from the foundation as a result of lateral forces such as those generated in earthquakes and high winds.
2. Description of the Related Art
In typical building construction the walls are comprised of a frame that is anchored to the foundation and a covering that is installed onto the frame. Typically, the frame of a building has a number of vertically extending studs that are positioned between an upper and a lower plate. The lower plate is typically anchored to the foundation and the covering material, e.g., plywood, siding and the like, is then nailed to the studs.
One problem that occurs in buildings is that lateral forces applied in a direction parallel to, and in the plane of, the wall can cause the upper section of the wall to move relative to the lower plate which is anchored to the foundation. These forces often occur as a result of natural phenomenon such as high wins and earthquakes. It will be evident that too much movement of the upper sections of the wall relative to the anchored lower plate can result in damage to the frame of the wall which can further result in the wall collapsing.
To address this particular problem, buildings are often equipped with a lateral bracing system. One type of lateral bracing system is known as shear panels that are installed in the walls to stiffen the structure against racking or deformation in the plane the walls. For example, in the typical residential building, wherein the frames are primarily constructed of wood, plywood sheathing is attached to three or more of the studs, and to the upper and lower plate of the wall, to inhibit the movement of the upper portion of the wall in response to these lateral forces. Specifically, the end studs of the shear panel or posts are typically fastened to a heavier anchor bolt, known as a holdown bolt, at a position adjacent to the end posts by means of various hardware types known as holdowns. The plywood, which forms a vertical diaphragm, is attached to the upper plate and the lower plate of the wall, and also to the posts with specified boundary fasteners such that the shear force is transmitted through the diaphragm to end posts, the holdown device, and bolt. Hence, the tendency of the upper portion of the wall to move relative the lower portion of the wall as a result of the shear forces is reduced. Basically, the plywood diaphragm creates diagonal braces that inhibit movement of the upper portion of the wall relative to the lower portion.
These shear panels are typically built in the field during the construction of the building. It will be appreciated that constructing these structures in the field can be time consuming and can also result in construction errors that will affect the strength of the wall.
Further, these types of shear panels and, in particular, the plywood shear panels used in wooden framed buildings, must be comparatively large to withstand the significant amount of lateral forces that are generated in large earthquakes. For example, most building codes limit the story drift or lateral deformation to ¼″ for an 8′ wall height in all types of buildings. The ratio of the height of various shear panels to their width is also limited by the building code depending on the type of sheathing material used. To achieve this limitation on story drift in response to this applied lateral force, the shear panel must generally include a plywood diaphragm that is on the order of 2 to 4 feet in length. While on long walls there may be the space available between openings to position a 4-foot long or greater shear panel, in smaller buildings with smaller lengths of walls, there is often no room to construct shear panel of this size. Further, it will be appreciated that multiple story buildings are more susceptible to larger lateral forces often necessitating even larger lateral bracing structures. This exacerbates the problem of a limited amount of space in walls of smaller lengths.
Hence, there is a need for a shear panel which is easy to install and is comparatively small in size so that it can be readily installed in walls having shorter lengths. To this end, there is a need for a prefabricated shear panel that is capable of ready installation into and between the studs of walls wherein the shear panel is capable of minimizing the movement of the upper portion of the wall relative to the lower portion to within an acceptable amount.
The aforementioned needs are satisfied by the pre-assembled internal shear panel apparatus of the present invention which is comprised of two side members, or vertical posts that are spaced apart, and at least one diaphragm member that is positioned between, and connected to, the two side members. Further, there is an upper and lower member that is connected to the side members and the diaphragm members so as to form a rigid structure.
The lower member is positioned within a bracket member that is configured to be attached to a holdown bolt that is anchored in the foundation. There are two bracket members, one on each end, which are attached to one of the posts and both of the bracket members are also respectively connected to holdown bolts that are anchored in the foundation of the building.
The side, top and bottom members of the shear panel are all attached to form a preferably rectangular frame of which the upper member of the panel is connected to an upper plate of the wall. This results in a shear panel capable of opposing lateral forces in the plane of the wall so as to reduce movement of the upper plate of the wall with respect to the lower plate.
In one preferred embodiment, the posts are formed out of a plurality of light gauge steel members and there are two sheets of sheet steel forming a diaphragm that are attached to both of the posts substantially along the full length of the posts and to the top and bottom frame members, with one sheet on each side of the frame. Further, there is preferably at least one reinforcing member which interconnects the posts positioned between the upper and lower member and between the two sheets forming the diaphragm members. The reinforcing member stiffens the side members and reduces the tendency for the steel sheets to buckle when the shear panel is under load.
The shear panel of the preferred embodiment is attached at the bottom corners to holdown bolts which are anchored in the foundation of the building and the bottom member of the steel frame is fastened to the concrete foundation with a minimum of two anchor bolts or approved fasteners. The upper member of the shear panel of the preferred embodiment is connected to the upper plate of the frame of the wall so that lateral forces in the plane of the wall are transmitted to the sear panel. Because the later force is applied through the top plate there is an overturning effect on the panel that is resisted by the end posts, holdown assembly and anchor bolts. The horizontal shear force is resisted by the additional anchor bolts or fasteners in the bottom frame members. In one preferred embodiment, a gusset is used to attach the upper member of the shear panel to the upper plate of the frame of the wall. Further, in the preferred embodiment additional shear bolts are mounted through the lower member of the shear panel into the foundation of the building to reduce the likelihood that the shear panel will become dismounted at the bottom end from the foundation as a result of shear forces applied against the wall.
The shear panel of the preferred embodiment is preferably shipped to the job site substantially assembled. The installer simply has to attach the mounting brackets to the holdown bolts that are anchored in the foundation and then position the lower member of the shear panel in the brackets. Subsequently, the installer has to secure the lower member of the shear panel to the brackets, and, hence, to the concrete foundation with cast-in-place anchor bolts or other approved fasteners. Subsequently, the remainder of the shear panel can be attached to the lower member. Further, the upper member of the shear panel can then be attached to an upper portion, e.g., the upper plates, of the wall. Hence, installation of the shear panel of the preferred embodiment is simplified over constructing an appropriate shear panel in the field during the construction of the building.
In addition, the configuration and metal construction of the shear panel of the preferred embodiment results in a shear panel that is capable of withstanding greater amounts of shear forces than the shear panel structures of the prior art. This allows the shear panel of the preferred embodiment to be smaller in size, e.g., have a smaller width, which allows the shear panel to be installed along smaller wall sections without a decrease in the amount of protection against lateral forces. These and other objects and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Reference will now be made to the drawings wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.
Referring initially to
The side posts 102a and 102b at their upper ends 103a and 103b respectively, are connected to a horizontal upper member 104. Similarly, the vertical posts 102a and 102b are connected at their respective lower ends 105a and 105b to a horizontal member 106. The interconnection between the posts 102a and 102b and the upper and lower members 104, 106 respectively is described in greater detail hereinbelow in reference to
Further, at least one diaphragm member 110 which forms a brace member for the apparatus 100 extends between the vertical posts 102a and 102b substantially along the entire height of the vertical posts 102a and 102b and is also connected to the upper member 104 and the lower member 106. As will be described in greater detail hereinbelow, the diaphragm member serves to transmit a force in opposition to the force exerted on the upper member 104 to the lower member 106.
As is also shown in
In the preferred embodiment there are two diaphragm members 110a and 110b which are preferably comprised of sheet steel wherein each of the diaphragm members 110a and 110b have a lip 122 formed on a side of the diaphragm member 110. Preferably, as shown in
Hence, the post 102a is comprised of an inner retaining member 114 that is reinforced by the reinforcing members 116 and the tube 126 positioned therein. The diaphragm members 110a and 110b are then positioned adjacent the inner retaining member 114 and captured within the outer retaining member 120.
As shown in
The foregoing description has described the preferred construction of the vertical post 102a, it will be appreciated that the vertical post 102b is constructed in an identical fashion as the vertical post 102a.
As is also shown in
The lower member 106 is also comprised of a piece of U-channel that has an opening 148 that is substantially equal to the thickness of the outer retaining member 120 of the vertical post 102a and 102b to thereby allow the vertical posts 102a and 102b to be positioned within the lower member 106 and secured thereto. In the embodiment shown in
As is also shown in
In one preferred embodiment of the shear panel of the present invention, the reinforcing members 116 are comprised of two pieces of Cee-channel that is 1½″×2″ wide, 18 gauge and approximately 7′-2″ or 9′-6″ in length. The inner retaining member 114 is comprised of 2⅞″×2¼″ U-channel that is 18 gauge and is 7′-8″ or 10′ long depending upon the embodiment of the shear panel that is being fabricated. The diaphragm members 110a and 110b are preferably comprised of a sheet of 18 gauge steel that is 7′-8″ or 10′ long depending upon the application and 2′ wide wherein the sheet is bent along one edge to form a 2″ lip. The outer retaining member 120 is preferably comprised of 18 gauge U-channel that is 3″×2″ in cross-section and is either 7′-8″ long or 10′ long depending upon the application. The upper and bottom members 104 and 106 are comprised of 18 gauge U-track that is 5 13/16″×2⅜″ in cross-section and is 1′-10″ in length. The brackets 130a and 130b are preferably comprised of ⅛″ thick steel that is 6½″ in height, 2 9/16″ in width and 3″ long. Further, along the side walls of the bracket there are three ½″ holes drilled on both of the side walls. Further, there is a 2 9/16″×3″×½″ thick plate 150 welded to the bottom of the bracket with a 1″ hole in the center and ⅛″ chamfers along the lower 3″ edges.
The installation and operation of the sheer panel 100 will now be described in reference to
The shear panel 100 is connected to an upper plate 162 of the wall structure, which in this embodiment is comprised of two 2″×4″ boards, via a gusset 164 in the manner shown in
At the lower end of the shear panel 100, the brackets 130a and 130b comprise an anchor point or attachment point that are mounted over two holdown bolts 166a and 166b that are anchored in the foundation 170 of the building. The holdown bolts 166 can either be previously anchored into the foundation 170 or they can be retrofitted into the foundation in the desired location using well-known methods. Generally, the holdown bolts 166 stub up through the upper surface of the foundation 170 and the brackets 130a and 130b can be positioned over the holdown bolts with the bolts extending through an opening 133 (
Subsequently, the lower member 106 can then be installed in the bracket and the vertical posts 102a and 102b can then be positioned within the lower member 106 at a position adjacent the brackets 130a and 130b so that the bolts 132 can be installed through the brackets 130a and 130b, the lower member 106 and the posts 102a and 102b to secure the posts 102a and 102b to the brackets 130a and 130b and thereby anchor the vertical posts 102a and 102b and the diaphragm members 110a and 110b forming the panel 100 to the foundation.
It will also be appreciated that it may be desirable to attach the shear panel 100 to one or more shear bolts 172 that are previously mounted in the foundation 170. The shear bolts 172 stub up out of the foundation 170 and holes can be drilled in the lower member 106 so that the lower member 106 can be positioned over the shear bolts 172 and then attached to the shear bolts via nuts. Further, it will be appreciated that spacers 174 (
From the foregoing description, it will be understood that the shear panel 100 of the preferred embodiment is easy to install in the wall of a building. Specifically, the builder of the wall simply has to ensure that the holdown bolts 106 and the shear bolts 172 are positioned so as to be substantially co-planar with one of the two outer edges of the upper plate 162 of the frame. Subsequently, the brackets 130a and 130b can then be mounted on the holdown bolts in the previously described fashion and the lower member 106 can be connected to the shear bolts and positioned within the brackets 130a and 130b.
Subsequently, the remainder of the shear panel 100 can be installed in the lower member 106 and the bolts 132 can be installed to connect the vertical post 102a and 102b to the lower member 106 and the brackets 130a and 130b. Further, screws 124 along the lower member 106 can then be installed to interconnect the lower member 106 to the diaphragm members 110a and 110b. Once the shear panel 100 is connected to the foundation, the gusset 164 can then be connected to the upper member 104 and the upper plate of the wall. In the preferred embodiment, the shear panel 100 will preferably be shipped to the job site in substantially the configuration shown in
It will be appreciated that installation of the shear panel 100 on the wall 168 reduces the tendency of the upper portion 180 of the wall 168 to move with respect to the foundation 170. Specifically, the arrows 182 and 184 are representative of lateral forces that are directed parallel to the length of the wall 168. It will be appreciated that when a lateral force in the direction of the arrow 182 is applied to the wall 168 the upper portion 180 of the wall 168 will have a tendency to pivot about the left-most holdown bolt 166a. However, the force in the direction of the arrow 182 is opposed by an equal and opposite force exerted on the right bottom corner of the shear panel 100 by the holdown bolt 166b thereby reducing the tendency of the shear panel to overturn. The shear bolts 172 prevent the panel and wall 168 from sliding in the direction of the arrow 182.
Basically, the gusset 164, the upper member 104, the diaphragm members 110a and 110b and the posts 102a and 102b provide a diagonally braced frame in each direction of the arrow 186 in
Hence, the shear panel 100 opposes the movement of the wall in directions which are parallel to the length of the wall and in the plane of the wall and, based upon pseudo-cyclic testing performed at the University of California, Irvine, in Irvine, Calif., a shear panel having the configuration of the preferred embodiment of the shear panel 100 is capable of withstanding up to 3500 lbs. of load applied to the upper portion 180 of a 7′-8″ wall structure 168 while only having the upper portion of the wall deflect approximately ½″ or less from its normal resting position.
Essentially, the shear panel 100 preferably functions like a large vertical cantilevered girder fixed at the bottom and loaded horizontally in the plane of the panel at the top member. The diaphragm members 110a and 110b resist the shear forces and the flanges of the girders are comprised of the post assemblies 102a and 102b which resist the axial stress due to bending. Preferably, the brackets 130a and 130b and the holdown bolts 166 are sized to withstand the uplift force generated by the overturning moment of the panel 100 when exposed to forces in the direction of the arrows 182 and 184, i.e., horizontal forces, and the shear bolts 172 are sized to resist the horizontal shear force. The reinforcing members 140 serve the purpose of reducing the tendency of the diaphragm members 110a and 110b to buckle under the loads generated by the shear forces. It will be appreciated that the shear panel 100 of the preferred embodiment is thus very easy to install and is capable of withstanding significantly more shear forces than the shear panels that are currently used in residential and business construction.
Further, a gusset 164′ can also be used to attach the lower member 106 of the upper shear panel 100 to a floor space member 200 of the two-story wall 190. The straps 194 firmly connect the bottom portion of the upper shear panel 100b to the top portion of the bottom shear panel 100a so that the upper panel 100b is anchored to the lower panel 100a across the floor space member 200 between the two stories of the wall.
Further, the lower gusset 164′ further reduces the tendency of the upper portion of the second story of the wall 190 to move with respect to the lower plate 196 of the second story of the wall as the shear panel is connected along its entire width to the floor space member 200 of the second story of the wall via the lower gusset 162b. Since the lower shear panel 100a is attached to the foundation in the manner described above in reference to
It will be appreciated that the previously described preferred embodiments of the shear panels are easy to install as a result of their prefabrication and provide excellent protection against shear forces that are acting in a direction parallel to the length of the wall. Specifically, the shear panel of the present invention uses two reinforced posts with an interconnecting diaphragm member to transfer the forces, resulting from a shear force being applied against the wall, to the holdown bolts that are embedded in the foundation. Since the panel is largely pre-fabricated, the worker simply has to connect the panel to the upper plate of the wall and then connect the lower portion of the panel to the holdown and shear bolts mounted in the foundation. Hence, it is simpler for the construction worker to install the shear panel and, since the panel is pre-fabricated, the possibility of field installation error, which would increase the probability that the panel would not perform as intended, is of course reduced.
Further, since reinforced posts are used in conjunction with metal diaphragm sheets, the amount of shear force that can be transferred to the holdown bolts is increased. Specifically, using the shear panel constructed in the manner as the shear panels of the preferred embodiment, a shear panel that is only two feet in width can be used in the place of a shear panel structure fabricated out of plywood and the like that is over four feet in length. Hence, shear panels constructed according to the teachings of the preferred embodiment, e.g., with reinforced metal posts and with metal diaphragm members, can be used to provide protection against movement of the upper portions of walls relative to the foundations for walls that are short in length.
Although the preferred embodiment of the present invention has shown, described and pointed out the fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to these embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form of the detail of the device illustrated, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Consequently, the scope of the invention should not be limited to the foregoing discussion, but is to be defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of copending application Ser. No. 09/603,727, filed on Jun. 23, 2000. Application Ser. No. 09/603,727 is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/985,479, filed on Dec. 5, 1997, now abandoned. Application Ser. No. 08/985,479 is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/572,519, filed on Dec. 14, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,706,126.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 140526 | Munson | Jul 1873 | A |
| 328185 | Butchee | Oct 1885 | A |
| 390732 | Weston | Oct 1888 | A |
| 673558 | Kline | Dec 1900 | A |
| 1353998 | Laughlin | Sep 1920 | A |
| 1604605 | Purdy | Oct 1926 | A |
| 1607166 | Mccall | Nov 1926 | A |
| 1622962 | Michod | Mar 1927 | A |
| 1689642 | Bappteyea | Oct 1928 | A |
| RE17154 | Purdy | Dec 1928 | E |
| 1719200 | Schumacher | Jul 1929 | A |
| 1742045 | Menes | Dec 1929 | A |
| 1849273 | Broderick | Mar 1932 | A |
| 1895667 | Junkers | Jan 1933 | A |
| 1997809 | Cole | Apr 1935 | A |
| 2010971 | Thomson | Aug 1935 | A |
| 2020988 | Balletta | Nov 1935 | A |
| 2053226 | Ruge | Sep 1936 | A |
| 2063010 | Balduf | Dec 1936 | A |
| 2076728 | Keller | Apr 1937 | A |
| 2080593 | Albert | May 1937 | A |
| 2089023 | Hahn | Aug 1937 | A |
| 2124519 | Piersen | Jul 1938 | A |
| 2137767 | Betcone | Nov 1938 | A |
| 2154520 | Mackin | Apr 1939 | A |
| 2160225 | Newman | May 1939 | A |
| 2180830 | Le Tourneau | Nov 1939 | A |
| 2191804 | O'Malley | Feb 1940 | A |
| 2193550 | Coe, Jr. | Mar 1940 | A |
| 2254190 | Ricken | Aug 1941 | A |
| 2256394 | Lamel | Sep 1941 | A |
| 2263214 | Larkin et al. | Nov 1941 | A |
| 2271584 | Fellom | Feb 1942 | A |
| 2278331 | Meyercord | Mar 1942 | A |
| 2281185 | Forster | Apr 1942 | A |
| 2445491 | Edgar | Jul 1948 | A |
| 2457964 | Wyche | Jan 1949 | A |
| 2497887 | Meler | Feb 1950 | A |
| 2576530 | Medal | Nov 1951 | A |
| 2633610 | Hervey | Apr 1953 | A |
| 2666238 | Hagedorn | Jan 1954 | A |
| 2725608 | Parslow | Dec 1955 | A |
| 2742114 | Behlen | Apr 1956 | A |
| 2743980 | Hobbs | May 1956 | A |
| 2803856 | Kofabl et al. | Aug 1957 | A |
| 2856646 | Latimer et al. | Oct 1958 | A |
| 3010547 | Blythe | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3037593 | Webster | Jun 1962 | A |
| 3133322 | Douglas | May 1964 | A |
| 3143827 | Showalter, Sr. | Aug 1964 | A |
| 3160245 | Pavlecka | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3172509 | Dugger | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3206903 | Johnson | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3300926 | Heirich | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3304675 | Wood et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3310917 | Simon | Mar 1967 | A |
| 3328927 | Kates | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3360892 | Rosso | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3452501 | Zimmer et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3474582 | Wah et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
| 3568388 | Flachbarth et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3612291 | Skubic | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3623288 | Horowitz | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3633327 | Klingensmith et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3638380 | Perri | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3657849 | Garton | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3658388 | Hasegawa | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3668828 | Nicholas et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3724078 | Carlin et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3744197 | Wetzel, Jr. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3748799 | Tough et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3775920 | Schneller | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3820295 | Folley | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3822521 | Lucas | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3854253 | Slowbe | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3871153 | Birum, Jr. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3875719 | Menge | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3916578 | Forootan et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 4016697 | Ericson | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4016698 | Rogers | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4037281 | Reynolds | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4037379 | Ozanne | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4037381 | Charles | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4040232 | Snow et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4065218 | Biggane | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4069635 | Gilb | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4074487 | Daniels et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4078352 | Knowles | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4114333 | Jones et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4122647 | Kovar | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4130970 | Cable | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4157002 | Adolph | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4182080 | Naylor | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4220423 | Sivachenko | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4221087 | Lowe | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4250671 | Hirsch et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4283892 | Brown | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4292782 | Schaeffer | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4295299 | Nelson | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4295318 | Perlman | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4301628 | Lowe | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4309853 | Lowe | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4321776 | Delight | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4339903 | Menge | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4366659 | Jensen | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4370843 | Menge | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4435932 | Seaburg et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4439957 | Raasakka et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4441286 | Skvaril | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4441289 | Ikuo et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4471591 | Jamison | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4498264 | Mccafferty et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4514950 | Goodson, Jr. | May 1985 | A |
| 4522000 | Barari | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4546590 | Finch et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4552094 | Johnson | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4559748 | Ressel | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4563851 | Long | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4577826 | Bergstrom et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4603531 | Nash | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4631894 | Jerila | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4633634 | Nemmer et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4637195 | Davis | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4648216 | Reaves et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4706422 | Ashton | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4726166 | Derees | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4736566 | Krotsch | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4794746 | Ramer | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4799339 | Kobori et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4863189 | Lindsay | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4875314 | Boilen | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4879160 | Knudson et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4910929 | Scholl | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4918900 | Fee et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4922667 | Kobori et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4937933 | Dietrich | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4937993 | Hitchins | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4937997 | Thomas, Jr. et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5056577 | Delong et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5065558 | Boatsman | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5070661 | Lo Guidici | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5072570 | Johnson | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5218803 | Wright | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5271197 | Uno et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5279088 | Heydon | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5333426 | Varoglu | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5345716 | Caplan | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5350265 | Kinner | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5353560 | Heydon | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5375384 | Wolfson | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5388358 | Mazhar | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5390466 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5417026 | Brumfield | May 1995 | A |
| 5426893 | Hoffman | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5457927 | Pellock et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5467570 | Leek | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5491950 | Obegi | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5499480 | Bass | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5505031 | Heydon | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5524406 | Ragland | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5546723 | Jones | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553437 | Navon | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5579615 | Hoffman | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5581969 | Kelleher | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5617693 | Hefner | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5619837 | Disanto | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5628495 | Gandara | May 1997 | A |
| 5640824 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5649403 | Haisch | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5651229 | Wada et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657606 | Ressel et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5664388 | Chapman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5692353 | Bass et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5706614 | Wiley, Jr. et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5706626 | Mueller | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713176 | Hunt | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5727663 | Taylor | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729950 | Hardy | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735087 | Olden | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5761873 | Slater | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5782047 | De Quesada | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782054 | Varoglu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788396 | Goto | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5788397 | Goto | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807014 | Goto | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5807015 | Goto | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5823701 | Goto | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5842318 | Bass et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5845438 | Haskell | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5848512 | Conn | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5862639 | Abou Rached et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5870870 | Utzman | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5873672 | Goto | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5904025 | Bass et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5906451 | Goto | May 1999 | A |
| D411021 | Chapman et al. | Jun 1999 | S |
| 5921054 | Rudd | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5924815 | Goto | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5937607 | Li | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950385 | Herren | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5979130 | Gregg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987828 | Hardy | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5996292 | Hill et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006487 | Leek | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6018917 | Leek | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6067769 | Hardy | May 2000 | A |
| 6073413 | Tongiatama | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6079168 | Shaver | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6109850 | Commins | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6148583 | Hardy | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158184 | Timmerman, Sr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6185898 | Pratt | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192637 | Boilen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6205725 | Butler | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212849 | Pellock | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6240695 | Karalic et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6244004 | Timmerman, Sr. et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6250029 | Jeffers et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6260323 | Hockey | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6298612 | Adams | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6298617 | De Quesada | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308469 | Leung | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6327831 | Leek | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6345476 | Hill | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6385942 | Grossman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6481175 | Potter et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6484460 | Vanhaitsma | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6560940 | Mueller | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6615896 | Andalia | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6643986 | Commins et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6662506 | Fischer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6668508 | Boone et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6877285 | Poma et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7073298 | Phan | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7251920 | Timmerman, Sr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 8112968 | Mueller | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8281551 | Leek | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 20010002529 | Commins et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002806 | Commins et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020020122 | Mueller | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009964 | Trarup et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20040068947 | Commins et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20050126105 | Leek et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050284073 | Leek et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20070062135 | Mueller | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 228186 | Jan 1959 | AU |
| 549294 | Jan 1986 | AU |
| 6487 | Jun 1994 | AU |
| 2330695 | Jan 1996 | AU |
| 715517 | Feb 2000 | AU |
| 2196869 | Feb 1996 | CA |
| 419526 | Aug 1966 | CH |
| 259837 | Jun 1912 | DE |
| 468949 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 2559408 | Aug 1985 | FR |
| 2599408 | Dec 1987 | FR |
| 2315288 | Jan 1998 | GB |
| 49108213 | Oct 1974 | JP |
| 54087616 | Jun 1979 | JP |
| 54152319 | Nov 1979 | JP |
| 57106810 | Jul 1982 | JP |
| 57143307 | Sep 1982 | JP |
| 60085144 | May 1985 | JP |
| 60122420 | Aug 1985 | JP |
| 63039297 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| 02049449 | Apr 1990 | JP |
| 03199550 | Aug 1991 | JP |
| 3208936 | Sep 1991 | JP |
| 4083038 | Mar 1992 | JP |
| 4098908 | Mar 1992 | JP |
| 5044276 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 52019113 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| 6002358 | Jan 1994 | JP |
| 6322839 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 8159121 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| 8284296 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 8296278 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 8302861 | Nov 1996 | JP |
| 9256738 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| 9273214 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 9279684 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 10140653 | May 1998 | JP |
| 10184076 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| 11229490 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 2003293487 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 186060 | Nov 1980 | NZ |
| 221612 | Mar 1993 | NZ |
| WO9602713 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Go-Panel Publisher: Go-Bolt, Inc., Deland, Florida, Published as early as 1999 (7 pages). |
| Affidavit of Karen Colonias Regarding Testing of Third Party Products by Simpson Strong-Tie. (38 pgs), Sep. 11, 2007. |
| Utzman, Charles H. Provisional Patent Application Specification entitled “Shear Panel Joint.” (25 pages), May 15, 1996. |
| James A. Adams, “Z-Wall”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/003,181, filed Sep. 5, 1995 (Honolulu, Hawaii). |
| “Bulldog Timber Connectors. Develop Full Strength of Timber Members at Connections”, Product brochure. Publication date unknown, received in the offices of James R. Cypher Oct. 24, 1997, Bulldog A/S, Oslo, Norway. |
| “Bulldog Steel Safety Timber Connectors.” Product data. 1938. O. Theodorsen, C. E., Oslo, Norway. |
| “Hurri-Bolt Uplift Solutions. The Truss Tie-Down That Will Blow You Away. Engineering Manufacturing & Installation. SBCCI Report #9910,” Product brochure. Publication date unknown; received in the offices of James R. Cypher Jul. 28, 1999. Hurri-Bolt Uplift Solutions, Inc. Tampa, Florida. |
| Evaluation Report ER-5467. Rayco Earthquake Mitigation Anchor System. Nov. 1, 1998. ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., Whittier, California. |
| Evaluation Report PFC-5342. Hard Frame, Hardy Frame Heavy Duty, 18-inch Hard Braced Frame and Hardy Frame Screw. Sep. 1, 1999. ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. Whittier, California. |
| MBR TDSystem “Typical Component Installation Details.” Installation instructions and product data. Jun. 9, 1993, MBR Systems, South San Francisco, California. |
| Probolt, “Structural Tie Down System.” Product data Sheet, installation instructions, and SBCCI Report No. 9916. 1999 Probolt, Orlando, Florida. |
| “Seismic Solutions Structural Tie Downs. Quake-Tie. The Superior Hold-Down Solution.” Product brochure and data sheet. Jan. 1998. |
| “Simplified Structural Systems. Makers of the Hardy Frame.” Product brochure. Dec. 1, 1999. Simplified Structural Systems, Ventural, California. |
| “Simpson Strong-Tie Connectors. Strong-Wall Shearwall.” Product data. 1999. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc., Pleasanton, California. |
| “Simpson Strong-Tie Connectors. Strong-Wall Shearwall.” Installation guide. 2001. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc., Pleasanton, California. |
| “MKP Monkey Paw Anchor Bolt Holders.” “LBP/BP Bearing Plates.” “RFB Retrofit Bolts.” Wood Construction Connectors. Catalog-C-96. 1995. Simpson Strong-Tie Compnay, Inc., Pleasanton, California. p. 19. |
| Dunkley, D. “Prefab Shear Walls.” The Journal of Light Construction. vol. 18, No. 3. Dec. 1999. pp. 46-53. |
| “Every Home Needs Z-Walls. The Strongest Shear Wall in the Smallest Space.” Product brochure, 4 pages. Date unknown. KC Metal Products, Inc. San Jose, California. |
| “Zwall Shear Walls. Strength Where You Need It.” Product data on-line. Retrieved from the internet Jun. 13, 2001 from URL: http://www.z-wall.com/photo15.htm, http://www.z-wall.com/photo7.htm, and http://www.z-wall.com/diag15.htm. |
| Tissell, J.R. & Rose, J.D. “Research Report 146. Roof Diaphragms for Manufactured Homes.” American Plywood Association Technical Services Division. Tacoma, Washington, Sep. 1993. |
| Keith, E.L. “Research Report 153. Big Bin: Performance and Testing.” American Plywood Association Technical Services Division. Tacoma, Washington. May 1990. |
| “Technical Note No. N370B. Stapled Sheet Metal Blocking for APA Panel Diaphragms.” American Plywood Association. Tacoma, Washington. Nov. 1993. |
| “Industrial Use Guide. Materials Handling.” APA The Engineered Wood Association. Tacoma, Washington. Jan. 1995. |
| “The Produce Protector. Making a Case for Plywood Harvest Bins.” APA The Engineered Wood Association. Tacoma, Washington, May 1996. |
| A Test of Time. Plywood Harvest Bins Span Three Decades in Use. APA The Engineered Wood Association. Tacoma, Washington. Nov. 1996. |
| “APA Collapsible Bin Design and Fabrication.” APA The Engineered Wood Association. Tacoma, Washington. Feb. 1997. |
| “Plywood for Tobacco Storage,” Memorandum. APA The Engineered Wood Association. Tacoma, Washington. Date unknown. Received in the offices of James R. Cypher May 1997. |
| Breyer, D.E. Design of Wood Structures, 3rd Edition, Chapter 8 “Plywood and Other Structural-Use Panels” and cover and back (total 42 pgs), McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993. |
| Breyer, D.E. Design of Wood Structures, 3rd Edition, Chapter 10 “Shearwalls” and pp. 497-532. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993. |
| Foliente, G.C., ed. Earthquake Performance and Safety of Timber Structures. Forest Products Society. Madison, Wisconson. 1997. (See in particular: Karalic, M. “Analysis of Performance of Floors and Shear Walls with the New Engineered Bracing Systems,” pp. 115-124 and Commins, A. et al., “Effect of Hold-Downs and Stud-Frame Systems on the Cyclic Behavior of Wood Shear Walls,” pp. 142-146). |
| “CS/CMST Colled Straps.” & “SA/HAS Strap Connectors.” Wood Construction Connectors. Catalog C-96. 1995. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc., Pleasanton, California. p. 56. |
| “LTP/A34/A35 Framing Anchors.” Wood Construction Connectors. Catalog C-96. 1995. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc., Pleasanton, California. p. 58. |
| “HCST Hinge Connector Straps,” “VB/VBP Knee Braces,” “PSCL Panel Sheathing Clips,” & “IS Insulation Supports.” Wood Construction Connectors. Catalog C-97. 1996. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc., Pleasanton, California. p. 53. |
| Schmid, B.L. “Apartment Bldgs Seismic Strengthening.” Calculation sheet. Jul. 30, 1994 Balboa Island, California. |
| Utzman, Charles H. Provisional Patent Application Specification entitled “Shear Panel Joint.” Filed May 9, 1997 (23 pgs). |
| “Typical CS Installation as a Floor-to-Floor Tie with Strap attached over plywood.” Drawing sheet. |
| Alfred D. Commins and Robert C. Gregg, “Cyclic Performance of Tall-Narrow Shearwall Assemblies,” Apr. 5, 1994, (12 pgs). |
| Affidavit of Karen Colonias Regarding Testing of Third Party Products by Simpson Strong-Tie. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/705,662. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 08/975,940. |
| Patty Christofferson, Tests of Narrow Plywood Shear-wall Panels Reveal Lack of Rigidity of Hold-down Anchorage, Structural Engineer's Association of Northern California Research Committee—Research Bulletin Board, Jan. 1994, B-1, BB94-1, Structural Engineers Association of Northern California, San Francisco, CA. |
| Cyclic Testing of Narrow Plywood Shear Walls, ATC R-1, 1995, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA. |
| Lee W. Mueller, Corrugated Diaphragm Shear Panel, U.S. Appl. No. 60/215,290, filed Jun. 30, 2000. |
| Craig J. Miller, Light Gage Steel Infill Panels in Multistory Steel Frames, Engineering Journal, 1974, pp. 42-47, 2nd Quarter, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois, United States. |
| Yasuhiko Takahashi, Toshikazu Takeda, Yasushi Takemoto, Masatoshi Takagi, Experimental Study on Thin Steel Shear Walls and Particular Steel Bracings under Alternative Horizontal Load, Reports of the Working Commissions, Symposium: Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, 1973, pp. 185-190, vol. 13, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Lisboa, Spain. |
| Vincent Caccese, Mohamed Elgaaly, Ruobo Chen, Experimental Study of Thin Steel-Plate Shear Walls under Cyclic Load, Journal of Structural Engineering, Feb. 1993, pp. 573-587, vol. 119, No. 2, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, United States. |
| Mohamed Elgaaly, Yinbo Liu, Analysis of Thin-Steel-Plate Shear Walls, Journal of Structural Engineering, Nov. 1997, pp. 1487-1496, vol. 119, No. 11, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, United States. |
| Mohamed Elgaaly, Vincent Caccese, C. Du, Postbuckling Behavior of Steel-Plate Shear walls Under Cyclic Loads, Journal of Structural Engineering, Feb. 1993, vol. 119, No. 2, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, United States. |
| Mohamed Elgaaly, Vincent Caccese, Steel Plate Shear Walls, Proceedings of the 1990 National Steel Construction Conference, copyright 2003, pp. 4-1-4-28, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America. |
| “Memorandum re Calculation of Wood Shrinkage for Proposed Quake-Tie Hold-down System Consideration.” Jan. 20, 1997. Seismic Solutions, Glen Ellen, California. |
| Concise Drafting Services, Various letters, drawings and brochure from Roll Form Industries Pty, Ltd. Authors: Paul Tongiatama, e. La Monaca, J. House and Roll Form Industries. |
| Thallon, Rob. Graphic Guide to Frame Construction. Sep. 1991. (total 10 pgs), pp. 70, 77 79-82. The Taunton Press, Newtown, CT. |
| American Plywood Association. APA Homeowner's Guide to Earthquake Safeguards. Selected web pages (total 8 pgs), 1992. |
| Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Connectors for Earthquake Retrofit and New Construction. copyright 1991. Total 16 pages, Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc., USA. |
| Breyer, Donald E. Design of Wood Structures. 1993, Chapter 3, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4 and Chapter 10 (total 98 pgs). |
| Japanese Language Newspaper Article, 1 page. |
| Japanese Language Magazine Article, “Wide Focus”, 2 pgs. (p. 20, 21). |
| Color Photocopies, “Wood Framed Residential Project in Kobe Japan Utilizing MFG. LWM Steel Shear Panels”, 1996, 4 pgs. |
| Acceptance Criteria for Prefabricated Wood Shear Panels, ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., Jul. 1997, USA. |
| John R. Tissell, Wood Structural Panel Shear Walls, May 1993, Report 154, APA Engineered Wood Association, USA. |
| The Hardy Frame Brochure, HFX Series: Sheer Wall Systems. Total 16 pgs, A Mitek Company. |
| ShearMax Panel Brochure, by Shear Transfer Systems, (8 pgs), Hesperia, CA. |
| LBN—Light Beam Inc., Steel Homes, 17 pgs, 1995. |
| ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. Report: STS Prefabricated Lateral-Force Resisting (LFR) Panel System.6 pgs. Jul. 1, 1998. |
| Chen, W.F. Handbook of Structural Engineering, 1997, pp. 1-1 through 1-27, 2-1 through 2-7, 2-117 through 2-164, 3-1 through 3-11, 3-49, 3-50, 5-1 through 5-53, 7-49 through 7-53, 8-5, 8-6, 19-1 through 19-23, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/043,835, filed Apr. 14, 1997, “Lateral Force Resisting System,” Inventor: Timothy L. Timmerman (53 pgs). |
| “Trembler Spurs Builder to Create Anti-Quake Frame,” Daily Press (Victorville, CA), p. A-4 (1 page), Apr. 26, 1999. |
| “P.T. Brace,” Roll Form Industries Pty Ltd. (Acacia Ridge, Qld.), 2 pgs. |
| Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc. Catalogue, “Handbook of Structural Designs & Load Values,” Strong-Tie Timber Connectors (2 pgs), Sep. 20, 1978. |
| Donald E. Breyer, “Design of Wood Structures,” 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Inc., Chapters 9, 11, 12.1 and 12.9, cover and title page (total 89 pgs), Dec. 20, 1993. |
| Paul Polikapo Tongiatama, Provisional Specification “PT Brace”, (28 pgs), dated Jun. 28, 1994. |
| “Typical CS Installation as a Floor-to-Floor Tie with Strap attached over plywood,” Drawing, drawing shows installation occurring at least as early as Jan. 1, 1995, 1 page, see accompanying statement. |
| “Affidavit of Karen Colonias Regarding Testing of Third Party Products by Simpson Strong-Tie,” affidavit concerns earlier events, some of which took place at least as early as May, 1995, 38 pages, see accompanying statement. |
| Authors: Paul Tongiatama, E. La Monaca, J. House and Roll Form Industries, Pty. Ltd., “Various letters, drawings and brochure concerning activities by Concise Drafting Services and Roll Form Industries Pty, Ltd.”, documents suggest activities took place as early as May 30, 1994, 11 pages, see accompanying statement. |
| Japanese Language Newspaper Article of Unknown Author, Title and Publication Name, believed publication date is Feb. 12, 1996, 1 page, see accompanying statement, publisher unknown. |
| Japanese Language Magazine Article of Unknown Author and Title, Wide Focus Magazine, at least as early as Mar. 1996, 2 pgs. - pp. 20, 21, see accompanying statement, publisher unknown. |
| Photocopies of pictures showing “Wood Framed Residential Project in Kobe Japan Utilizing Lee Mueller's Steel Shear Panels”, building erected in 1996, 4 pgs., see accompanying statement. |
| The Hardy Frame—Brochure, it is believed this brochure was public in early 1997, see accompanying statement, 4 pgs, Hardy Frames, California, US. |
| ShearMax Panel Brochure, it is believed this brochure was public in early 1998, 8 pages, Shear Transfer Systems, Hesperia, California, US, see accompanying statement. |
| P.T. Brace—Brochure, this reference is similar to reference C53 the documents of which suggest activities took place as early as May 30, 1994, 2 pages, Roll Form Industries Pty Ltd., Acacia Ridge, Queensland, Australia, see accompanying statement. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130025222 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09603727 | Jun 2000 | US |
| Child | 13385333 | US | |
| Parent | 08985479 | Dec 1997 | US |
| Child | 09603727 | US | |
| Parent | 08572519 | Dec 1995 | US |
| Child | 08985479 | US |