The present invention relates generally to inserts for use in correcting various corneal-related defects. More particularly, the present invention relates to intrastromal corneal inserts for use in treating Keratoconus and other corneal-related dystrophies.
The cornea is the outermost fibrous transparent coating of the eye which resembles a watch glass. The curvature of the cornea is normally somewhat greater than the rest of the globe of the eye and is ideally spherical in nature. The central third of the cornea is referred to as the optical zone or visual pathway with a slight flattening taking place outwardly thereof as the cornea thickens towards its periphery. Most of the refraction of the eye takes place through the cornea.
There are a number of dystrophies which involve a gross deformation of the cornea and which cause severe vision problems. If allowed to progress, such dystrophies can lead to blindness. One of these dystrophies is Keratoconus, in which a bulge or cone develops on the cornea. For a cornea with Keratoconus, the corneal tissue is thin, and one's normal eye pressure pushing on the weakened thin tissue causes the bulge or cone. This results in complex reflections and scattering patterns of light entering the eye, which prevent the appropriate focusing of an image onto the retina, and the structure of the cornea is significantly weakened. This phenomenon is shown in
The cone in a Keratoconic eye manifests differently in each patient. In other words, the cone can vary by position both centrally, as opposed to radially, in addition to the angle as would be observed in a polar coordinate axis. The cone can also vary by size in the sense of the height of the protrusion, known as sagital depth, the cone's slope measured by a “K” or Keratometry reading, and the surface area of the footprint of the cone. In addition, the thickness of the cornea, although different for each individual, typically falls within a normal range. However, for a keratoconic cornea, the cornea is abnormally thin and contributes to its irregular shape in a patient-specific way. The thinning of the cornea affects the cornea's structural integrity, leads to the creation of a bulge or cone and the extenuating visual problems that result.
There are a number of other conditions which are similar to Keratoconus in nature. These conditions include ectasia (corneal thinning), post-LASIK ectasia, pellucid marginal degeneration and other corneal dystrophies. All of these dystrophies lead to gross deformities of the cornea with consequences similar to Keratoconus. Therefore, while the present application discusses Keratoconus in particular, it should be understood that the principles, products and procedures discussed herein are also applicable to other similar conditions.
One method for correcting these disorders is through the implantation of polymeric rings (intrastromal corneal rings) in the eye's corneal stroma to flatten, strengthen and change the curvature of the cornea. Previous work has involved the implantation of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) rings, allograft corneal tissue, and hydrogels for common refractive procedures: myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism. One of the ring devices that has been conventionally used involves a split ring design which is inserted into a channel that has been previously dissected in the stromal layer of the cornea. Such a ring is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,086, in the name of Silvestrini. Other ring devices use PMMA intrastromal rings which completely encircle the cornea. Such ring designs are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,452,235 and 4,671,276, both in the name of Reynolds, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,961,744, in the name of Kilmer. In each of these rings, a minimally invasive incision is used both for producing a channel and for inserting the implant as a permanent refractive procedure for myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism. However, these rings are not designed for correction of various visual aberrations caused by Keratoconus or other conditions of the cornea, and these designs are not directed to the introduction of therapeutic or diagnostic materials into the corneal intrastromal space.
For corneas with gross deformities or abnormalities caused by corneal disease, there has been a need for an improved product and method for treating these abnormal keratoconic corneas, improve a patient's vision and avoid a treatment of last resort, i.e., a corneal transplant. In these more extreme cases, conventional intracorneal ring segments can normalize the shape of the cornea from within, add structural integrity, flatten the protruding cone and, in the process, eliminate many of the visual distortions and aberrations caused by Keratoconus and other corneal dystrophies, while also stabilizing the progression of Keratoconus.
Although conventional intracorneal ring segments can provide the benefits discussed above, they suffer from a number of technological deficiencies. For example, conventional intracorneal ring segments do not cause a sufficient amount of flattening or reshaping of the cornea when placed outside of the visual pathway or optical zone where light enters the eye. Although it has been determined that a more central placement of the intracorneal ring segments leads to greater flattening efficacy, all known ring segments generate halos, glare and unusual light scattering when placed near or inside the visual pathway, as light rays are defracted by the intracorneal rings themselves across the visual pathway of the eye. Each of these deficiencies make conventionally known and commercially available intracorneal ring segments inadequate in treating the visual problems caused by Keratoconus and other similar corneal dystrophies.
The present invention is directed to a pre-formed polymeric insert suitable for insertion between the lamella of the corneal stroma. The insert comprises a full or semi-circular ring or an arc-shaped segment of a ring and can be used in isolation, or in multiples, encircling a portion or all of the cornea. In the case of multiple inserts, the inserts can be of substantially uniform or of varying physical dimensions. The insert may comprise one or more synthetic or natural high-modulus biocompatible polymers. The ring inserts possess a low light scattering design and can be one of a contiguous shape or of varying physical dimensions across the arcuate.
These and other advantages and features of the invention, together with the surgical procedures, organization and manner of operation thereof, will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like elements have like numerals throughout the several drawings described below.
a) is a top view of a circular ring segment of one thickness according to a first embodiment of the present invention;
b) is a cross-sectional view of the circular ring segment shown in
c) is a top view of a circular ring of a varying thickness across its arcuate according to an embodiment of the present invention;
d) is a top view of a pair of circular ring segments of a similar thickness according to an embodiment of the present invention;
e) is a top view of a pair of circular ring segments of a varying thickness across its arcuate according to an embodiment of the present invention;
a) is a top view of an oval-shaped ring segment of one thickness or of a varying thickness, across its arcuate according to another embodiment of the present invention;
b) is a cross-sectional view of oval shaped ring segments showing two cross sections, representing cross sections at two different locations along the arcuate of a varying thickness ring segment or the cross section of two separate and distinct ring segments of uniform thickness according to an embodiment of the present invention;
c) is a top view of a pair of oval shaped ring segments of a similar thickness, or of a varying thickness, across its arcuate according to an embodiment of the present invention;
a) is a top view of an ellipsoidal ring segment of one thickness or of a varying thickness, across its arcuate according to a third embodiment of the present invention;
b) is a cross-sectional view of the ring segments shown in
c) is a side view of an ellipsoidal ring of a varying height across its arcuate according to an embodiment of the present invention;
d) is a top view of a pair of ellipsoidal ring segments of a similar thickness, or of a varying thickness, across its arcuate according to an embodiment of the present invention;
e) is a side view of an ellipsoidal ring segment, as shown in
a) is a top view of a semi-ellipsoidal ring segment of one thickness or height, or of a varying thickness and height, across its arcuate according to an embodiment of the present invention;
b) is a cross-sectional view of semi-ellipsoidal ring segments showing three cross sections, representing cross sections at three different locations along the arcuate of a ring with different thicknesses and heights, or the cross section of three separate and distinct ring segments of uniform thicknesses and heights according to an embodiment of the present invention;
c) is a top view of a pair of a semi-ellipsoidal ring segments of a similar thickness or height, or of a varying thickness and height, across its arcuate according to an embodiment of the present invention;
d) is a top view of a semi-ellipsoidal ring segment with a varying cross sectional width across its arcuate according to an embodiment of the present invention, where the height and thickness can be uniform or nonuniform;
e) is a top view of a pair of semi-ellipsoidal ring segments with a varying cross sectional width across their arcuate. For each segment, the thickness and height can be uniform or nonuniform according to an embodiment of the present invention;
In order to make a smaller diameter intracorneal ring (in the range of less than 6.5 millimeters) work as an effective device, a compromise is required between the flattening and reshaping effect to the cornea when placed within the optical zone and a ring of a low light scattering design. Intracorneal ring segments constructed in accordance with this compromise address both the visual and physiological issues caused by Keratoconus. In particular, the present invention serves to provide minimal light diffraction while flattening a bulbous cornea into a more naturally reshaped cornea.
As used herein, certain terms may have the following defined meanings. As used in the specification and claims, the singular form “a,” “an” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. For example, the term “a segment” includes a plurality of segments, including mixtures thereof. It should also be noted that the term “ring portion” can refer to a segment of a ring or an entire ring.
As used herein, the terms “segment,” “insert,” and “ring,” in the singular form or in plural are construed to have the same meaning. As used herein, the terms “intrastromal” and “intracorneal” will be construed to have the same meaning.
As used herein, the term “comprising” is intended to mean that the compositions and methods include the recited elements, but not excluding others. “Consisting essentially of” when used to define compositions and methods, shall mean excluding other elements of any essential significance to the combination. “Consisting of” shall mean excluding more than trace elements of other ingredients and substantial method steps for use of the devices of this invention. Embodiments defined by each of these transition terms are within the scope of this invention.
All numerical designations, e.g., arc, diameter, distance and the like are approximations which are varied (+) or (−) by increments of about five percent. It is to be understood, although not always explicitly stated, that all numerical designations are preceded by the term “about.”
The corneal stroma is the third layer of the cornea, as well as the thickest layer. It is transparent and located within the middle of the cornea between Bowman's Membrane and Descemet' Membrane.
The corneal lamella is the uniform fibers made of collagen within the stroma. Pre-formed means that the ring and/or ring segments have been shaped or formed before being implanted into the cornea and whose dimensions are suitable in terms of shape, thickness, height, width and curvature for implantation into the cornea.
As used herein, circular means that the object is shaped substantially like a circle, with its radius being of equal length from all points along the outside surface of the object. As used herein, oval means a circular shape with its radius being of varying lengths from the outside surface of the object. As used herein, ellipsoidal means a cross-section of a ring which is circular in design, tapering off to two blunt end points adjacent to one another. As used herein, semi-ellipsoidal means a cross-section of a ring which is circular by design, tapering to one blunt end point on one side and remaining circular on the geometrically adjacent side. As used herein, arcuate means the arc of the ring from end to end and all points along the arc.
With respect to the high-modulus biocompatible polymers, the term high-modulus means a biocompatible polymer that is stiff with a moduli equal to or greater than about 3.5 kpsi. A biocompatible polymer is material that is physiologically suitable for introduction into the body. Examples of each include, but are not limited to, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), teflon, polycarbonate, polysulfones, epoxies, polyacrylates or polyefins such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polybutylene, and their mixtures and interpolymers. Many such materials have been used in the manufacturing of hard contact lenses. A hybrid device will be comprised of a low modulus material for the outer surface layer and a high modulus material for its inside core. For the outer layer of a hybrid device, the polymeric materials comprises low modulus polymers which have a modulus of elasticity less than about 3.5 kpsi, more preferably between about 1 psi and about 1 kpsi and most preferably between about 1 psi and about 500 psi, which are physically compatible with the eye. These biocompatible, low modulus materials include physiologically compatible elastomers and such cross-linked polymeric gels such as polyhydroxyethylmethylacrylate (Poly-HEMA) or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyethylene oxide, or polyacrylates, polyacrylic acid and its derivatives, and their co-polymers, as well as biologic polymers such as cross-linked dextran, cross-linked heparin, or hyaluronic acid. Thermoplastic hydrogels include hydropolyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl alcohol derivatives, hydrophilic polyurethanes, stryrene-PVP block copolymers and the like.
Dimensions or physical dimensions shall mean the shape, thickness, height and width of a cross section of a ring segment.
Angled edge shall mean a blunt, rounded but angled end point on the outside surface of a ring along its arc. A spacing element shall mean a pre-formed object which is inserted between the corneal lamella causing it to spread.
One aspect of the present invention comprises a pre-formed polymeric insert suitable for insertion between the lamella of the corneal stroma, as well as a method for using such an insert. The insert comprises a full or semi-circular ring or an arc-shaped segment of a ring and can be used in isolation, or in multiples, encircling a portion or all of the cornea. In a further aspect, the one or more segments comprising the ring are of the same or different shape, thickness, height or width. Thus, in one aspect, the segment is of a length that when inserted into the eye is less than a complete 360° ring. In one aspect, the segment is of a length less than 360°, yet greater than 180°. In a further aspect, the segment is more than 1° yet less than 180°. Preferred segment size ranges include from about 270° to 355°, about 200° to 269°, about 140° to 199°, about 70° to 139°, and about 20° to 69°. In the case of multiple inserts and/or ring segments, the segments can be of the same or different size as defined by arcuate. They can also be of varying cross-sectional dimensions, meaning shapes, thicknesses, heights or widths, along the arcuate of the ring. The insert may comprise one or more segments that are individually or collectively comprised of high-modulus biocompatible polymers. In another aspect, the one or more inserts are “hybrid” because they comprise different layered materials, or alternatively or in addition, is hollow. Accordingly, the one or more segments can be one of a contiguous shape, thickness, height and width, or of varying dimensions across the arcuate.
By “low light scattering,” the present invention is referring to designs that reduce clinical effects such as halos, glare, star-bursts, photophobia and poor night vision to the point that they do not materially degrade vision. It is known that smooth, edgeless, clear materials, such as PMMA, tend to provide even and predictable refraction of light. It is also known that edges, points or sharp angles create uneven, unpredictable stratification of light, also referred to as light diffraction or light scattering. As ring portions or segments are moved into the eye's optical zone to remediate the disease state of keratoconus, the one or more ring or ring segment's contour and shape must be designed to eliminate visual side affects and aberrations caused by light scattering due to their design and placement. Clinically, patients using prior art devices have identified halos, glare, star-bursts, photophobia and poor night vision, due to one's pupils widening in dark surroundings bringing the rings into view, as typical symptoms from known intrastromal rings. The term “low scattering” designs reduce the above mentioned clinical effects to the point that they do not materially degrade vision.
In one embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in
In another embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in
In another set of embodiments depicted in
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in
A further embodiment of the present invention involves a ring design that varies in the cross-section of the ring segment 20 along the arcuate of the ring, which serves to flatten the cornea and to thicken the cornea specific to where it is thin. In other words, such a design provides a spacing element to compensate for unevenness in corneal tissue caused by disease and allows it to reshape the cornea to its natural shape. The physical dimensions of a full, semi-circular ring or arc shaped segment of a ring, meaning its cross sectional shape, thickness, height or width, may vary in any way to address deficiencies in corneal shape. One, more or all of these physical dimensions may vary along the arcuate of the ring.
Yet another embodiment of the invention involves a ring design that is configured to match the refractive index of the intrastromal ring to that of the cornea. In this embodiment, the matching of the refractive index of the intrastromal ring to that of the cornea serves to eliminate halos, glare and light scattering, while still providing the same flattening effect necessary for the keratoconic cornea.
In addition to the above embodiments, it is also possible to incorporate an angled edge on the outer surface of the ring segments 20, with the back or adjacent end having more of a rounded architecture.
A variety of methods can be used to insert the ring segments of the present invention. For the purpose of illustration only, an intrastromal corneal insert of the present invention can be placed within the cornea of the eye as follows. First, a determination is made as to what shape the cornea should have in order for that eye to operate in an optically correct manner. This can be accomplished using any suitable method known in the art. For the purpose of illustration only, optical measurements of the eye can be taken, for example by using a topographical grid or topography of the type shown in
The procedure, according to this embodiment of the invention begins with the geometric center of the cornea being marked using a placement and incision marker, as shown in
The incision is slightly larger than the ring segments 20 to be implanted and is made at a distance away from the geometric center equal to the radius of the ring from the same point. As an example, a 6.5 millimeter ring would be implanted through an incision at 3.25 millimeters from the geometric center, and a 5.5 millimeter ring would be implanted at 2.75 millimeters from the geometric center. Typically, the incision is made along the steep meridian as seen on a topographical map of the eye, temporally or superiorly depending upon the patient's condition.
A channel is created within the corneal stroma by inserting a counter clockwise or clockwise corneal dissector blade 82 and gently threading it through and spreading the stroma lamella. The dissector blade 82 is threaded approximately two-thirds the way around the cornea circumferentially, as shown in
With forceps, the intrastromal ring is threaded into the channel in one direction until completely seated in the channel. A second ring is then threaded into the opposite channel and both segments are placed in position by a standard Sinsky hook or similar instrument. Typically, intracorneal inserts contain small adjusting holes at their ends. Using a Sinsky hook, the surgeon can maneuver the inserts within the channels using these adjusting holes to get best placement. After placement of the segments, the single incision is then closed using a suture and is removed several weeks or months later depending on the healing process.
This procedure can be replicated with the use of a femtosecond laser. The laser will create tunnels in the cornea stroma through laser ablation beneath the surface of the cornea, thereby eliminating the incision marker and the need for manual dissection. The laser will also make the incision. The rings will be inserted and placed in position using forceps and the incision is closed using a suture.
The foregoing description of embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the present invention. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the present invention and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the present invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4452235 | Reynolds | Jun 1984 | A |
4671276 | Reynolds | Jun 1987 | A |
4961744 | Kilmer et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5188125 | Kilmer et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5300118 | Silvestrini et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312424 | Kilmer et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318047 | Davenport et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5323788 | Silvestrini et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5403335 | Loomis et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405384 | Silvestrini | Apr 1995 | A |
5466260 | Silvestrini et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475452 | Kuhn et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5505722 | Kilmer et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5592246 | Kuhn et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5599341 | Mathis et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5628794 | Lindstrom | May 1997 | A |
5645582 | Silvestrini et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653752 | Silvestrini et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5693092 | Silvestrini et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5766171 | Silvestrini | Jun 1998 | A |
5785651 | Kuhn et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5824086 | Silvestrini | Oct 1998 | A |
5846256 | Mathis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5888243 | Silverstrini | Mar 1999 | A |
6050999 | Paraschac et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051023 | Kilmer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6175754 | Scholl et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6206919 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214044 | Silverstrini | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231582 | Gandiancoa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251118 | Proudfoot et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6361560 | Nigam | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6508837 | Silvestrini | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6543453 | Klima et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6607556 | Nigam | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6626941 | Nigam | Sep 2003 | B2 |
20020065555 | Nigam | May 2002 | A1 |
20020107566 | Nigam | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111677 | Nigam | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116056 | Kirk | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040034412 | Schachar | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034413 | Christensen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073303 | Schanzlin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040243231 | Koziol | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9312735 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 2005107648 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070219631 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |