The present disclosure is generally related to operation and management of document processing devices such as printers, scanners, copiers, combination scanner-printer-copier machines, and the like in accordance with customer accounts.
The disclosures of the following U.S. Patents and Patent Applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/364,224, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING PROOF OF PAYMENT FOR “PAY-AS-YOU-GO” MULTI-FUNCTION DEVICES”, and filed Feb. 2, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/424,820, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING CONTRACT-FREE ‘PAY-AS-YOU-GO’ OPTIONS FOR UTILIZATION OF MULTI-FUNCTION DEVICES”, and filed Apr. 16, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/424,858, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTIVELY CONTROLLING THE USE OF FUNTIONALITY IN ONE OR MORE MULTIFUNCTION DEVICES AND SUBSIDIZING THEIR USE THROUGH ADVERTISEMENTS”, and filed Apr. 16, 2009; U.S. Pat. No. 6,940,613, entitled “SYSTEM FOR MANAGING REPLACEABLE MODULES IN A DIGITAL PRINTING APPARATUS”, and issued Sep. 6, 2005; U.S. Pat. No. 6,076,076, entitled “PREPAID PRINT CARD SYSTEM AND METHOD”, and issued Jun. 13, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,999, entitled “FORMS AUTOMATION SYSTEM”, and issued Oct. 8, 1996; U.S. patent application Publication No. 2007/0094148, entitled “METHOD OF LICENSING FUNCTIONALITY AFTER INITIAL TRANSACTION”, and published Apr. 26, 2007; U.S. patent application Publication No. 2004/0125397, entitled “LICENSING METHOD FOR USE WITH AN IMAGING DEVICE”, and published Jul. 1, 2004; and U.S. patent application Publication No. 2004/0153415, entitled “METHOD OF LICENSING FUNCTIONALITY AFTER INITIAL TRANSACTION”, and published Aug. 5, 2004.
Document processing devices are often employed in networked systems in business and academic sites providing users the option of sending a given print job to one of several devices for processing. Organizations employing multiple document processing devices desire options for financing and tracking printer utilization, and may prefer to pay for print services and related devices and materials based on usage rather than paying up front for equipment and consumable accessories. Moreover, manufacturers and resellers of document processing devices desire the ability to provide such account options to end-users. Thus, there is a need for improved methods and systems for managing document processing device usage.
Document processing devices are disclosed along with operating methods therefor, in which a remaining print unit value is stored in memory on the device to indicate the amount of print units currently available to enable the device to perform the document processing operations, and a programmable computer of the device selectively performs document processing jobs for users and decrements the remaining print unit value until the value reaches zero and the device provides for expenditure of print units according to color content and/or coverage levels determined for a given job. The device can be a printer, scanner, fax, copier, or a multi-function device providing one or more of such document processing functions, which does not print until authorized by application of print units from a customer account managed by an external management system. Once provisioned with sufficient print units, the device consumes or expends the applied print units in performing document processing operations such as printing, faxing, scanning, copying, etc., where the device in certain implementations expends different amounts of print units for different operations (e.g., color pages consume more print units than do monochrome pages, high coverage print jobs consume more print units than low coverage jobs, etc.).
In one or more embodiments, a document processing device is disclosed, including at least one document processing component operative to perform one or more document processing operations using at least one consumable, as well as a memory that stores a remaining print unit value indicating an amount of print units currently available to enable the device to perform the document processing operations. The device includes a programmable computer operative to determine a job cost print unit value for performing a document processing operation associated with a given document processing job, and to determine whether the remaining print unit value is non-zero. If so, the programmable computer selectively causes the document processing component to perform the document processing operation and decrements the remaining print unit value according to the determined job cost print unit value.
In some implementations, the device will cease printing when the applied print units are depleted, and in other embodiments the programmable computer selectively causes the document processing component to perform a document processing operation at a reduced level of functionality when the corresponding remaining print unit value reaches zero, such as only allowing monochrome printing, for instance. Further embodiments of the document processing devices include consumable information obtained by the programmable computer from the consumable and stored in the memory, where the programmable computer operates to selectively provide the consumable information to an agent of a networked computer. In certain embodiments, moreover, the programmable computer can selectively increase the remaining print unit value upon receiving a message from an agent of a networked computer.
A current page price ratio (CPPR) value is stored in the memory in certain embodiments that represents the relative cost to print color and monochrome pages, and the programmable computer determines the print unit cost for a given job based on the color content of the job using the CPPR value. In some implementations, moreover, two or more CPPR values are stored in the memory, which correspond to different page coverage cost ratios, and the programmable computer determines page coverage levels for color pages of a given job and uses a corresponding CPPR selected according to the determined page coverage levels value to determine the job cost.
In other embodiments, a total print units used (TPUU) value is stored in the memory, which indicates the total number of print units applied to the device, and the memory further stores a stack with one or more entry pairs individually including a page price ratio (PPR) value and a threshold value (TPUUTH). The device computer in these embodiments compares the present TPUU value to the stack threshold values and sets the current page price ration (CPPR) value to the PPR value corresponding to the highest threshold value that is less than or equal to the present TPUU value to accommodate changes in the page print ratios over time as further print units are added to the document processing device.
Methods are also provided for operating a document processing device, which include storing a remaining print unit value in a memory indicating an amount of print units currently available to enable the document processing device to perform document processing operations, determining a job cost print unit value for performing a document processing operation associated with a given document processing job, and decrementing the remaining print unit value according to the determined job cost. The method further includes determining whether the remaining print unit value is non-zero, and if so, selectively causing a document processing component of the device to perform the document processing operation.
In some embodiments, a CPPR value is stored, and the job cost determination is based on the color content of the job using the CPPR value. Some embodiments, moreover, involve storage of multiple CPPR values corresponding to different page coverage levels, such as pixel counts, and determination of page coverage levels for color pages of a given document processing job, where the job cost determination includes determining the cost in terms of print units using a CPPR value selected according to the determined page coverage levels.
In other embodiments, the method includes storing a total print units used (TPUU) value indicating a total number of print units applied to the device, and a stack including at least one value pair including a page price ratio value (PPR) and a threshold value (TPUTH), as well as comparing the present value of the total print units used value to the threshold values in the stack, and setting the CPPR to the PPR value corresponding to the highest threshold value that is less than or equal to the present TPUU value.
Other embodiments include selectively causing the document processing component to perform a document processing operation at a reduced level of functionality when the corresponding remaining print unit value reaches zero. In still other embodiments, the remaining print unit value is selectively increased upon receiving a message from an agent of a networked computer via a communications interface of the device. Further embodiments also include storing consumable information obtained from a consumable of the device, and selectively providing the consumable information to an agent of a networked computer via a communications interface of the device.
The present subject matter may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various steps and arrangements of steps. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the subject matter.
Referring now to the drawings,
Referring also to
The exemplary document processing devices 320 shown in
The devices 320, moreover, are configured to allow normal customer/user initiated operation based on available print units applied to the device 320 in accordance with a customer account administered via the account manager system 104, and may optionally be authorized by the account particulars to perform at some low level of functionality even when the applied print units are depleted as discussed further below. By this device functionality, all or at least certain aspects of the actual or expected cost of document processing operation of a given device can be attributed to the customer based on usage, including the initial device cost, cost of consumables 322, costs for servicing (e.g., repairing, troubleshooting, etc.), costs for access to customer support, and other associated costs, rather than being paid up front by the customer.
Referring now to
As best shown in
The account information 110 for a given account also includes current pricing information 112 including at least one conversion factor for converting account credits available to the account to print units for specific document processing devices 320 registered to the account. The current pricing information 112 for individual accounts in this embodiment includes device type pricing information 112a including at least one price factor 112a1 for each specific document processing device type for converting account credits to print units, and at least one print unit price modifier 112a2 for each of a plurality of different specific document processing device types for increasing the print unit price if a given customer account provides for including one or more additional cost factors for consumables, service, and support in the print unit price. The pricing information 112 also provides customer specific pricing information 112b including discount information 112b1 and modifier flags 112b2 indicating applicability of one or more of the print unit price modifiers 112a2 for the given customer account.
In some embodiments, different discount information 112b1 can be provisioned in the account information 110 for specified document processing devices 320 obtained by a given customer from different resellers 200 and/or for specified document processing devices 320 obtained in different locations or regions, thereby providing reseller flexibility in offering discount incentives to select customers on a global or locality basis. Program provisions can be associated with specific account numbers prior to a reseller offering the accounts for sale to end-customers 300, for example, where the account particulars include account pricing (conversion rates for converting credits into print units), print unit valuation equivalent to typical print images based on coverage, color content, etc., inclusions of service, supplies and media, various incentives, etc. The pre-established account particulars can be associated with a device 320 upon account initiation prior to delivery to the customer 300. In addition, promotional incentives like time frame duration and/or number of printed images can be managed in concert with product usage information associated with and tracked by a customer account, for instance, by tracking use debits and credit balance payments and various particulars of image content.
Account credits are a global currency, which may, but need not, be tied to one or more official government monetary currency value (e.g., N credits per U.S. dollar, etc.) thereby allowing customers to purchase credits for their account(s) using any form of legal payment (e.g., payment obtained and verified electronically via financial institutions, credit organizations, etc.) or direct monetary payments, whether in Dollars, Euros, Yen, etc., with the account manager system 104 being operative to obtain current exchange rate information and make any necessary conversions from a given legal currency payment amount to an account credit amount. Print units, on the other hand, are valued for a given device type and possibly other factors, in terms of units per account credit on a transactional basis at the time of a user request to apply account credits to a particular document processing device, with the valuation being in terms of document processing operations, for instance, one print unit per monochrome page printed by a device 320, 5 print units per printed color page, where a processed ‘page’ as used herein is a single side of a printed media sheet (or a single page of a multi-page document or print job being scanned or operated on by a device 320), such that a device 320 consumes one print unit for printing monochrome images, text, etc., on a single side of an output sheet, consumes 5 print units for printing color images, text, etc. on a single side of a printable medium, and consumes 2 print units to print monochrome images, text, etc. on both sides of a printable media sheet in one example. The application of credits to devices 320, moreover, may be done with respect to integer and/or fractional credits and print units. For example, the customer may specify a given amount of account credits (in whole credits or fractions thereof) to be ‘applied’ to a device 320, and the account manager system may present the customer with the number of converted print units for that device 320, and the device may be adapted to accept fractional print unit amounts or the account management system may perform rounding to provide only integer print unit amounts, with any fractional values being retained as fractional credits in the customer account.
As illustrated in
In operation, a customer can request an estimate of remaining pages for a specific device 320 registered to the customer's account via an agent 360 and the portal 102, and the account manager system 104 in one embodiment will provide the remaining print units count value 118 in response. In certain implementations, the customer can use the agent to directly obtain this count value from the device itself via the agent 360 and the customer network 302 (e.g., the device 320 will report the current remaining print units value 323e from its internal data in memory 323 as shown in
Referring also to
As shown in
Returning to
At 510, the account manager system 104, upon customer credit purchase or ‘buy’ request via the agent 360 and portal 102, selectively adds credits to the specified account at a current rate and add a number corresponding to a paid amount of new credits to the available credits value 111c for the specified account if and when the payment for such by the customer is verified. In this example, the agent 360 requests the addition at 512 via the portal 102, and arranges payment, such as via an electronic third party payment mechanism, not shown. At 514, when the account manager system 104 is able to verify the customer payment, it adds available credits to the corresponding customer account, and thus increments the value 111c in the account information 110.
At 520, the account management component 106, upon a request from the customer via the authorized agent 360 and the portal 102, applies print units to a specified document processing device 320 associated with the specified account by converting a number of credits currently available to the specified account into a number of print units according to the specified document processing device 320 and the current pricing information 112 for the specified account at the time of the request. In this example, the customer requests application of print units at 522 to the device using available account credits. At 524, the account manager system 104 converts account credits to print units using the current pricing information 112, and updates the total applied print units (TAPU) value 115e in the corresponding device subaccount information 115. In one embodiment, account manager system 104 updates a stack 119 (
It is further noted that the interaction of the account management component 106 of the system 104, the agent components 360 on the customer computers 330, and the devices 320 can be implemented using multiple messages for requests, confirmations, authorizations, data exchanges, value updates, and other tasks, and the messages can be created and transmitted via any suitable network protocols, etc., and where the messaging is preferably controlled by appropriate authorization, password permission control, encryption, and other techniques to prevent uncontrolled print unit creation without authorization by the account manager system 104, and to guard against unauthorized access to the account information 110. In an alternative implementation, the concept of print unit deficiency notice may be supplemented or supplanted by an arrangement to use a low or out print unit threshold to trigger an automatic purchase of additional print units.
Referring also to
To implement this approach, the account manager system 104 and the devices 320 maintain corresponding information stacks 119, where the device subaccount information 115 for a given device 320 in the account manager system 104 includes a stack 119 as shown in
During printing or other document processing in this embodiment, (as discussed above and shown at 405 in
Referring also to
Referring also to
At 712, the account manager system 104 converts a number of print units previously applied to the specified first device 320 into a number of account credits available to the specified account according to the specified document processing device 320 and the current pricing information 112 for the specified account at the time of the requested transfer, updating the corresponding available account credits and authorizing the agent 360 to reduce the first device's remaining print unit value 323e (an also updating the print unit value 115c in the stored account information 110). At 714, the account manager system 104 applies print units to the specified second device 320 according to the customer request by converting converted account credits into a number of print units for the second device (320) according to the current pricing information (112) for the specified account at the time of the request, and the corresponding values and account data 110 are updated, with the agent 360 being authorized to apply the print units to the second device. At 716, the agent 360 updates the first and second devices 320, and the devices 320 update their internal count values at 718.
Referring also to
The account manager system 104 receives the request at 810, and applies available print units at 812 to the public device 320 (associated with the vendor's account) via a vendor-authorized agent 360 operatively coupled with the public device 320, and the manager system 104 converts a number of credits currently available to the user account into a number of print units according to the public device 320 and the current pricing information 112 for the vendor account at the time of the request. The vendor device 320 then prints the user's job at 814, and the account manager system debits the user's account credits at 816 according to the number of print units used by the vendor public device 320, based on the pricing information established in the vendor's account.
The disclosed methods and account manager systems thus facilitate accounting, provisioning, and controlled usage of a variety of different devices 320 associated with an account, allowing pricing for printing, scanning, faxing, support etc. to be tailored according to the type of service or product model, as well as selective inclusion of costs for consumables 322, service, and support according to specific accounts established for different customers, and for different locations or regions, and any other account-specific factors arranged by a manufacturer implementing the account management system 104 and/or by a reseller 200. The architecture, moreover, allows pricing changes to be made easily by simply updating the account credit-to-print unit conversion information (pricing information 112) at the management system data store. The system 104 also facilitates transfers of prepaid print units from one device to another as well as from a device 320 back to a customer account, thereby enhancing a customer's ability to manage printing devices and users. The customer is also able to selectively include various print unit pricing options, including service, consumables, and/or support, which can vary with the device age and the amount of usage within a given time period, thereby providing better adaptability for valued customers. The plan terms and provisions, moreover, are easily altered by changes to the stored account information 110 by agreement with specific customers. The system also allows consumables, such as toner cartridges, to be transferred from one device 320 to another, with the receiving unit reading the consumable identifier (e.g., serial number) and updating the management system account information accordingly. Moreover, the systems and methods disclosed above allow a specific device 320 to operate at predetermined reduced functionality levels if the device print units become depleted, for instance, where the printer is disconnected from the network 302, thereby allowing the customer to maintain operation until more print units can be applied via the account manager system 104.
In accordance with further aspects of the present disclosure, a computer readable medium or media is provided, such as a computer memory, a memory within the server 100 or other computer-accessible memory such as a CD-ROM, floppy disk, flash drive, database, server, computer, etc. which has computer executable instructions for performing one or more of the processes disclosed above.
The above described examples are merely illustrative of several possible embodiments of the present disclosure, wherein equivalent alterations and/or modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon reading and understanding this specification and the annexed drawings. In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described components (assemblies, devices, systems, circuits, and the like), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component, such as hardware, processor-executed software or firmware, or combinations thereof, which performs the specified function of the described component (i.e., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the illustrated implementations of the disclosure. In addition, although a particular feature of the disclosure may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several embodiments, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Also, to the extent that the terms “including”, “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, or variants thereof are used in the detailed description and/or in the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising”. It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications, and further that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5146344 | Bennett et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5563999 | Yaksich et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
6076076 | Gottfreid | Jun 2000 | A |
6202155 | Tushie et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6357942 | Adkins et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373587 | Sansone | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6452512 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471319 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6523924 | Adkins et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525837 | Adkins et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6567015 | Adkins et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6600150 | Adkins et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600151 | Chapman et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609781 | Adkins et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616261 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624407 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626513 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631971 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6637961 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6655777 | Adkins et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660996 | Adkins et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6763336 | Kolls | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768427 | Adkins et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768558 | Yamashita et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6823133 | Adkins et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826547 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830399 | Adkins et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6843547 | Adkins et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6865241 | Adkins et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871926 | Adkins et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873424 | Jakobsson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6917440 | Kondo | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6940613 | Beard et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6940913 | Verbin et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957921 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6963820 | Adkins et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965439 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976798 | Keane et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7050726 | Adkins et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7134594 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146114 | Frankel et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163273 | Silverbrook | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216951 | Garrana et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7240995 | Adkins et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7280772 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7369782 | Adkins et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376627 | Adkins et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7430605 | Quach et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7469107 | Adkins et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7585043 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7589850 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7689513 | Adkins et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7739198 | Adkins et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7788490 | Adkins et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792992 | Gnanasambandam et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7798594 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7859412 | Kothari et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8174714 | Watanabe | May 2012 | B2 |
20020039193 | Kondo et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049638 | Ito | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020073002 | Horii et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020131079 | Forbes et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135624 | Naka et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020194064 | Parry et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030065713 | Quach et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090705 | Ferlitsch | May 2003 | A1 |
20030098993 | Ohara | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115156 | Baker | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030137549 | Adkins et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151762 | Cherry et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040008371 | Keane et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012644 | Allen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040125397 | Adkins et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153415 | Adkins et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040179885 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190014 | Ferlitsch | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207668 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215577 | Mitsuda | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236705 | Shima et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249733 | Clough et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050091343 | Murray, Jr. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050162677 | Toumanova et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050206672 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050273403 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286913 | Adkins et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004672 | Leute | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020561 | Kodimer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060044590 | Ferlitsch et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056856 | Adkins et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065715 | Kojima et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069647 | Cozianu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060095280 | Gooding | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120735 | Adkins et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140647 | Adkins et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060190324 | Adkins et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200735 | Ormond | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224889 | Adkins et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233562 | Zwiefelhofer | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259983 | Sperry | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060290973 | Inouye et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070027990 | Nakaoka et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035762 | Wilsher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035763 | Bard et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070057982 | Adkins et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061268 | Herold et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075137 | Adkins et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070077074 | Adkins et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070079125 | Adkins et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088613 | Adkins et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094148 | Adkins et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070156523 | Liu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174218 | Kojima et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070182984 | Ragnet et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188530 | Garrana et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080010211 | Ferraro | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027875 | Adkins et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080065477 | Korhonen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071626 | Hill | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079989 | Agnetta et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107440 | Tsuzuki | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181622 | Adkins et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183630 | Stephenson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186187 | Adkins et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080186367 | Adkins et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080319845 | Adkins et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006247 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090066985 | Ferlitsch | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070243 | Buck et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070276 | Kodimer et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090147299 | Tetu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192910 | Rankin et al. | Jul 2009 | A9 |
20090248578 | Pollock et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100039669 | Chang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100088178 | Gnanasambandam et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088201 | Nagarajan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097626 | Moore et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100264214 | Gnanasambandam et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268591 | Gnanasambandam et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110011929 | Padua et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002215374 | Aug 2002 | JP |
0102946 | Jan 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/364,224, filed Aug. 5, 2010, Tredoux et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,820, filed Oct. 21, 2010, Gnanasambandam et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,858, filed Oct. 21, 2010, Gnanasambandam et al. |
Hamm, Steven, “Rivals Say HP Is Using Hardball Tactics”, Business Week, New York: Feb. 19, 2007, Issue 4022, p. 48. |
JD Biersdorfer, “Firewalls Hamper File Sharing Via Instant Messenger”, New York Times, Oakland Tribune, Oakland, Calif., May 24, 2004, p. 1. |
Wagstaff, Jeremy, “Personal Computing: Experts Give Answers to Readers' Questions on Guarding Privacy”, Wall Street Journal. (Europe). Brussels: Jul. 17, 2003. page A5. |
JD Biersdorfer, “Sharing files via an instant messaging program”, The New York Times, May 24, 2004 obtained from http://www.gainesville.com/article/20040524/BUSINESS/205240303, pp. 4-6. |
GB Search Report, May 24, 2011. |
Kelley, et al., Implementation of a Network Print Management System: Lessons Learned, Annals of Cases of Info. Tech., vol. 6, No. 1, 2004, pp. 293-311. |
“Pay per Click”, Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, Oct. 3, 2008, Web, Jan. 11, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay—per—click. |
“Pay per Click”, Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, Jan. 31, 2009, web, Jan. 11, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Pay—per—click. |
GB Office Action, GB1101124.4, Jun. 8, 2011. |
“Pay per Click”, Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, Apr. 7, 2009, web, Jan. 11, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay—per—click. |
“Pay per Click”, Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, Jan. 31, 2009, web, Jan. 11, 2011, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay—per—click. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110188067 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |