The present invention generally relates to a method and apparatus for utilizing preamble packets in a digital television signal stream. The method and apparatus are particularly suitable for the transmission of digital television signals to mobile and/or handheld portable devices capable of receiving digital television signals (hereinafter called “M/H receivers”) while maintaining backward compatibility with an existing digital television system, such as the one that complies with the ATSC A/53 digital television standard utilized in the United States. The term “M/H receivers” includes but not limited to portable television receivers, vehicular television receivers, cellular telephones, intelligent phones, laptop computers, and personal data assistants. The present invention also relates to a method and apparatus suitable for the reception of the digital television signals including the preamble packets.
Over the past decades, television broadcast transmission systems have migrated from analog to digital form. For example, in the United States, the Advanced Television Standards Committee (ATSC) developed a standard called “ATSC Standard: Digital Television Standard A/53” (ATSC A/53 standard) to replace the existing analog broadcast television system. The ATSC A/53 standard provides how data for digital television broadcasts should be encoded and decoded.
Furthermore, the ATSC A/53 standard defines how source data (e.g., digital audio and video data) should be processed and modulated into a signal to be transmitted over the air. In particular, the redundant information is added to the source data so that a receiver may recover the source data properly even under undesirable noises and/or multi-path interference conditions. Although the redundant information reduces the effective rate at which the source data is transmitted, such information increases the potential for successful recovery of the source data from a signal received.
The ATSC A/53 standard was developed primarily for high definition television (HDTV) reception at a fixed location (e.g., in a home). That is, the system was designed to maximize video bit rate for the television receivers with high resolution screens that were already beginning to enter the market. As a result, broadcast transmissions under the ATSC A/53 standard present difficulties for mobile reception. Enhancements to the standard are necessary for the rugged or robust reception of digital television signals by M/H receivers.
Recognizing this issue, in 2007 the ATSC announced the launch of a process to develop a new standard, called as the “ATSC-M/H standard,” for the effective transmission of digital television signals to M/H receivers. One of the requirements to the ATSC-M/H standard is to maintain backward compatibility with the existing legacy ATSC A/53 broadcast system so that the contents to be received by M/H receivers may be transmitted along with the legacy ATSC signal within the same 6 MHz transmission channel.
Some of the proposed transmission systems for the ATSC-M/H standard perform a periodic or burst transmission by periodically replacing portions of the continuous data stream normally provided by the legacy A/53 transmission system. The periodic mode transmission systems often add preambles to its data stream in order to assist the receiving system in overcoming the adverse effects caused by the transmission channel, such as noises, multipath interference, etc. The preambles typically include known or predetermined information to be used by receivers for training to improve their reception. For example, the preambles provide training knowledge for the equalizer circuit of M/H receivers. Thus, the proper use of the preambles may be useful particularly under severe receiving conditions, such as those found in mobile reception.
Although the preambles could improve the reception of digital television signals, it is noted that the digital television transmission system, capable of broadcasting both new periodic and legacy continuous television data, may face an additional problem. That is, the preambles included in the periodic data stream may be subject to the subsequent alternation by the legacy A/53 transmission circuit. This is because the periodic data stream, including the preambles, is provided to the legacy A/53 transmission encoder as an input signal in order to satisfy the backward compatibility between the new ATSC-M/H and the existing legacy A/53 transmission signals.
More specifically, an ATSC encoder, also know as an A/53 encoder or an 8-VSB encoder, used in the legacy ATSC television system typically includes a data randomizer, a Reed Solomon encoder, a byte interleaver, and a trellis encoder. The operation of ATSC encoder alters the content, location, and duration of the preamble information, created by the preceding ATSC-M/H transmission system, resulting in undesirable modification and spreading of the preamble information. This makes it difficult for M/H receivers to recover the preambles.
Second, in general, the training function of preambles becomes most effective if a preamble is provided at a certain predetermined time interval during transmission. Effective timing for the insertion of the preambles is necessary to minimize the adverse effect caused by the byte interleaver of the legacy ATSC decoder.
Third, the periodic insertion of M/H data in a legacy ATSC data stream creates a problem of restoring the correct trellis coding path by receivers. Since trellis coding relies on a “coding path,” a trellis decoder needs to keep track of past results. Furthermore, since the trellis encoding is done in the ATSC encoder over the interleaved data stream that includes both M/H and legacy A/53 data, it would be difficult for a receiver to track back the correct trellis coding path efficiently if the receiver is designed to receive only one of the new M/H and legacy ATSC signals.
Accordingly, there is a need for a method and apparatus that solves each one of the aforementioned problems. The present invention addresses these and/or other issues.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a method is disclosed. According to an exemplary embodiment, the method comprises receiving a stream of data packets, inserting a plurality of preamble packets into the stream of data packets prior to an interleaving of the resulting stream of data packets using convolutional interleaving, and the number of preamble packets is selected to correspond to the maximum delay of said convolutional interleaving.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus is disclosed. According to an exemplary embodiment, the apparatus comprises means such as a receiving point for receiving a stream of data packets, means such as a preamble packet inserter for inserting a plurality of preamble packets into the stream of data packets prior to interleaving the resulting stream of data packets using interleaving means such as a convolutional interleaver, the interleaving means interleaves the resulting stream of data packets using convolutional interleaving, and the number of preamble packets inserted by the inserting means is selected to correspond to the maximum delay introduced by the interleaving means.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method is disclosed. According to an exemplary embodiment, the method comprises receiving field synchronization data, receiving trellis-encoded interleaved training data, and using the field synchronization data and a portion of the trellis-encoded interleaved training data for synchronization of a receiver.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus is disclosed. According to an exemplary embodiment, the apparatus comprises means such as receiver circuitry for receiving field synchronization data, means such as synchronization circuitry for receiving trellis-encoded interleaved training data, and means for using the field synchronization data and a portion of the trellis-encoded interleaved training data for synchronization of a receiver.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus is disclosed. According to an exemplary embodiment, the apparatus comprises means such as a preamble packet inserter for inserting training data into a data stream, means such as an encoder for interleaving and trellis encoding the data stream containing the inserted training data, and means such as a multiplexer for inserting field synchronization data into the interleaved and trellis-encoded data stream, the training data is inserted at a position such that after interleaving and trellis encoding, the field synchronization data is transmitted amidst or adjacent to the trellis encoded interleaved training data in a fixed positional relationship allowing use of the field synchronization data and at least a portion of the training data for synchronization at a receiver.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method is disclosed. According to an exemplary embodiment, the method comprises receiving trellis-encoded interleaved data, the trellis-encoded interleaved data includes predetermined training data, determining the trellis coding path for the predetermined training data statistically, and trellis decoding the interleaved data based upon the determination.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method is disclosed. According to an exemplary embodiment, the method comprises receiving trellis-encoded interleaved data, the trellis-encoded interleaved data includes predetermined training data, determining the trellis coding path for the predetermined training data statistically, and trellis decoding the interleaved data based upon the determination; the interleaved data comprises data from a first transmission mode, such as a legacy A/53 transmission, and a second transmission mode, such as an M/H transmission.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus is disclosed. According to an exemplary embodiment, the apparatus comprises means such as a circuit point for receiving trellis-encoded interleaved data, the trellis-encoded interleaved data includes predetermined training data, and means such as a circuit for determining the trellis coding path for the predetermined training data statistically, the means trellis decodes the interleaved data based upon the determination.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The exemplifications set out herein illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
While this invention has been described as having a preferred design, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is, therefore, intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. For example, the described technique of preamble design, insertion, decoding, and use in synchronization could be applicable to transmission or reception systems designed for other types of data or that use different coding, error-correction, redundancy, interleaving, or modulation schemes.
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
MPEG Transport Stream (TS) Source 110 is coupled to ATSC M/H encoder 115, which contains Packet Interleaver 120, GF(256) Serial Concatenated Block Coder (SCBC) 125, Packet Deinterleaver 130, MPEG TS Header Modifier 135, and Preamble Packets Inserter 140. ATSC M/H encoder 115 processes an incoming data stream to produce a rugged data stream suitable for the reception and use by M/H receivers. The output of ATSC M/H encoder 115 is provided to legacy ATSC A53 encoder 145, which functions in accordance with the ATSC A/53 standard.
Packet Interleaver 120 receives from MPEG TS Source 110 a stream of data arranged in packets. Each packet contains 187 bytes, which includes a three-byte header for packet identification. Packet Interleaver 120 takes the bytes from a sequence of consecutive packets in row-by-row order and outputs them column-by-column. The output of Packet Interleaver 120 is provided to GF(256) SCBC 125. GF(256) SCBC 125 functions to code the packet interleaved data. In the embodiment described herein, GF(256) SCBC 125 is parameterized as a (n, k) systematic linear block code over the Galois Field GF(256)-n is in Bytes and k is in Bytes. The detailed operation of GF(256) will be described below in conjunction with
The output of GF(256) SCBC 125 is provided to Packet Deinterleaver 130. Packet Deinterleaver 130 takes the block coded output packets in a column-by-column order, and outputs the bytes row-by-row. As a consequence of the particular block code, the original packets are reconstituted and new packets are created from the parity bytes of the SCBC codewords. The output of Packet Deinterleaver 130 is provided to MPEG TS Header Modifier 135.
MPEG TS Header Modifier 135 receives the deinterleaved 187-byte packets. As mentioned earlier, each packet contains a three-byte header. The three bytes include a packet identification (PID), along with several other bits or groups of bits used to convey information regarding the packet. MPEG TS Header Modifier 135 functions to modify certain bits in the header portions of the ATSC M/H packets so that legacy ATSC receivers may ignore such packets while also not considering them as corrupt. The output of TS Header Modifier 135 is then provided to Preamble Packet Inserter 140.
Preamble Packet Inserter 140 may place predetermined tracking packets (i.e., preambles) into the rugged data stream. The preamble packets represent packets of predetermined information that are completely or mostly known to the receivers capable of receiving the rugged ATSC-M/H data stream, such as M/H receivers. Such preamble packets are used to assist with convergence in the equalizer portion of an M/H receiver. It is noted that although the predetermined packets are provided to improve reception primarily in M/H receivers, they may also be used to further improve the reception in the ATSC legacy receivers having an optional capability of processing the preamble packets as disclosed herein. It is further noted that the preamble packets may also be used in the M/H receivers to assist in decoding the trellis state created in the legacy ATSC A53 encoder 145 as disclosed herein. The output of Preamble Packet Inserter 140 is provided to legacy ATSC A/53 decoder 145.
Following the ATSC-M/H processing, the stream of data is provided to the legacy ATSC A/53 encoder 145, which includes Data Randomizer 150, Reed-Solomon Encoder 155, Byte Interleaver 160, 12-1 Trellis Encoder 165, Sync Multiplexer 170, Pilot Inserter 175, and Modulator 180 in accordance with the ATSC A/53 standard.
Data Randomizer 150 XORs the incoming ATSC-M/H or ATSC A/53 data bytes with a 16-bit maximum length pseudo random binary sequence (PRBS), which is initialized at the beginning of the data field. After data randomization, Reed-Solomon (RS) coding is performed at Reed-Solomon Encoder 155. The Reed-Solomon coding provides additional error correction potential for receivers with the addition of data to the transmitted stream for error correction.
A convolutional Byte Interleaver 160 interleaves the R-S packet in order to further randomize the data in time. Interleaving is a common technique for dealing with burst errors that may occur during the propagation of broadcast RF signals. Without interleaving, a burst error could have a large impact on one particular segment of the data, thereby rendering that segment uncorrectable. If the data is interleaved prior to transmission, however, the effect of a burst error may effectively be spread across multiple data segments. Rather than large errors being introduced in one localized segment that cannot be corrected, smaller errors may be introduced in multiple segments that are each separately within the correction capabilities of forward error correction, parity bit, or other data integrity schemes. For instance, a common (255, 223) Reed-Solomon code will allow correction of up to 16 symbol errors in each codeword. If the Reed-Solomon coded data is interleaved before transmission, a long error burst is more likely to be spread across multiple codewords after deinterleaving, reducing the chances that more than the correctable 16 symbol errors are present in any particular codeword.
The predetermined tracking packets, which may also be referred to as “preambles,” may be generated in a number of ways using known training sequence processes. In a preferred embodiment, the predetermined tracking packet includes a valid header with the remaining bytes generated using a pseudo-random number (PN) generator.
Referring now to
In the preferred embodiment, Preamble Block 1 (212) starts at the 261st packet. The dotted line between Preamble Block 1 (212) and Preamble Block 2 (215) indicates that a single two-block length (i.e., 52 packets) preamble occupies Preamble Blocks 1 and 2. A control packet included in Data Block 0 in the MPEG-format follows Preamble Block 2, which contains the system information necessary to define the contents of the current ATSC-M/H burst. ATSC-M/H Data Blocks 230 start at the respective ones of the twelve predetermined positions in a field. That is, Data Blocks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 start at the first (i.e., packet 0), 27th (i.e., packet 26), 53rd, 79th, 105th, 131st, 157th, 183rd, 209th, 235th, 261st, and 287th data packet positions, respectively when modulo 12 is employed. Data Blocks 10 and 11 may be used for the preamble data when a preamble is inserted. Lines 240 represent the virtual positions of the field synchronization data, where the synchronizing data is to be inserted at Sync Multiplexer 170 after Byte Interleaver 160 and Trellis Encoder 165 in
Referring now to
As mentioned above, data redundancy is a key to increase the robustness of the transmission data against the undesirable noises and/or multi-path interference of the transmission channel. One method to introduce redundancy into a transmission stream is to use a block code. In the preferred embodiment disclosed herein, as shown in
More specifically, GF(256) SCBC 125 encodes the bytes along the columns outputted from Packet Interleaver 120. Packet Deinterleaver 130 receives the encoded stream of codewords produced by GF(256) SCBC 125 and outputs reconstituted rows of 187-byte packets. That is, Packet Deinterleaver 130 inputs the encoded codewords in column by column order, with each column including the redundant bytes added by the processing in GF(256) SCBC 125, and outputs the bytes in a row by row arrangement. In a 12/26 code rate, 26 rows of packets will be output. The interleaving and block coding techniques are employed to produce a deinterleaved stream of the original packets followed by the redundant information coded in separate packets.
Referring now to
Each one of the MPEG packets 410 contains 187 bytes, including a 3-byte header 430. As described above, non-header data 420 of each preamble packet is generated from a pseudo-noise (PN) generator, resulting in a total of 2208 bytes of PN data. Pseudo-noise is useful as a content of a preamble since a receiver compares the received preamble data with the data generated by its own PN generator at the receiver end for accuracy.
A three-byte header 430 contains a 13-bit packet identifier (PID) that identifies the packet is part of an M/H transmission. Each header 430 is modified at MPEG TS Header Modifier 135 to contain the PIDs that are unrecognizable by legacy ATSC A/53 receivers. Thus, the legacy receivers may ignore the ATSC-M/H specific data, providing the backward compatibility.
As described above and as shown in
Referring back to
Referring now to
In addition to introducing a lag in the output data, Byte Interleaver 160 also introduces a spreading of data based upon the delays of the multiple shift registers 510. Like the actual MPEG data, the preamble data inserted prior to Byte Interleaver 160 for the use by M/H receivers become also spread. This makes recovery of the preamble in a receiver for training and/or error evaluation purposes more difficult since it would not be easy for the receiver to reconstruct the widely-spread interleaved data of the preambles.
It is noted that it is possible to reduce the undesirable impact of Byte Interleaver 160 by selecting the length of the preamble properly. On hand, while a shorter preamble may mitigate the undesirable impact of the convolutional interleaving better, such a preamble may also reduce its value for training purposes. On the other hand, while a longer preamble may provide more data for receiver training, such a preamble may be overly difficult to recover due to the convolutional interleaving. Therefore, determining the proper length of the preamble in time is important. Here, the length of the preamble is selected to correspond to the spreading of the preamble by the convolutional interleaver—i.e., to correspond to the maximum delay introduced to the final data symbols of the preamble by the interleaver. For example, as to an exemplary embodiment disclosed herein, the length of each preamble is selected to fifty-two packets, and the maximum delay of the interleaver is fifty two segment.
Referring now to
Interleaver map 600 indicates the location of input bytes that are placed or written in and how output bytes are read out. The dimensions of interleaver map 600 are indicated as bytes across the top, numbered from 0 to 206, and the rows of segments along the side from top to bottom, numbered from 0 to 103. Dotted line 605 indicates the order that bytes are read out. For instance, as line 605 represents row 20, all of the bytes in row 20 would be read out, starting with byte 0 and finishing with byte 206. When the last byte, Byte 206, is read out from row 20, the reading advances one row, to row 21, until the last row of the interleaver has been read out. When the last row is read out, the reading begins over with reading the first row (with new packet data).
Line 613 illustrates the location of the first 52 bytes of a 207-byte Reed-Solomon code word, based on reading in those bytes to Byte Interleaver 160. Line 613 starts with the location of byte 0 in the packet and terminates at a center line 640 with the location of byte 51. Lines 615, 617, 619a, and 619b show the location of the remaining bytes in the first packet. Line 615 starts with the location of byte 52 at the top of the line, and so on, and processes with byte locations for each of lines 615, 617, and 619a. The remaining portion of bytes is located along line 619b and terminates with byte 206 at a location in a row one row below line 640. The location of bytes in successive packets continues to the left of the locations for the first packet and then process to the portion of the map below line 640 mirroring the procession and locations above line 640. For example, line 650 shows the location of a portion of the bytes for a fifty-second packet (i.e. a packet input 52 packets after the first packet) in Byte Interleaver 160. Line 653 illustrates a boundary line for the transmission of a grouping of packets. With each successive packet, the next successive byte from that packet falls on the boundary line. As a result, line 653 represents the packet 0 byte 0 location, followed by the packet 1 byte 1 location, and so on, to the packet 52 byte 52 location.
The locations of data on the M/H data blocks of
As illustrated in
It is noticed that the preamble data for M/H receivers may also be used to improve the reception of legacy ATSC A/53 signals if a receiver is designed to decode both A/53 legacy sync data and M/H preamble information. This is because part of the predetermined preamble information along with the legacy sync data, both of which include predetermined information, may be used altogether for receiver training, synchronization, or other purposes. It is noted that in order to utilize both legacy sync data and M/H preamble data, one needs to have a predetermined relationship with the other. More specifically, the pre-interleaved preamble data, inserted at Preamble Packet Inserter 140, needs to have a predetermined timed-relationship with the legacy sync data inserted at Sync Multiplexer 17.
For example, in
If the synchronization is not achieved with a single segment of ATSC A/53 sync data, a legacy ATSC A/53 receiver using only the sync data alone would be required to wait until the next sync data is received. This is undesirable especially, for example, in a condition where a user rapidly changes the program channels (such as flipping the program channels quickly); a failure to achieve synchronization quickly may run a risk of causing a total failure of achieving synchronization at all. Conversely, an M/H receiver capable of receiving the legacy sync data may be supplemented its training and/or synchronization with the preamble data. In an M/H receiver, portions of the receiving hardware may be designed to shut down between the bursts of M/H data to reduce overall power consumption. Thus, the fast synchronization as power is reapplied to receive each burst is desirable.
Referring now to
The trellis coding and precoding divides input bytes into two-bit words and outputs the corresponding three-bit words based upon the two-bit input and the state of precoder 920 and trellis encoder 910. Each possible value of the three-bit output is mapped to one of the eight levels (i.e., −7, −5, −3, −1, 1, 3, 5, and 7) in Symbol Mapper 980 of the 8VSB modulation scheme.
In creating serial bits from parallel bytes, the MSB is sent first. The MSB of each incoming two-bit symbol X2 (930)—i.e., bits 7, 5, 3, 1 of the byte—is precoded, and the LSB of each incoming two-bit symbol X1 (940)—i.e., bits 6, 4, 2, 0—is feedback convolutional encoded. ATSC A/53 uses standard 4-state optimal Ungerboeck codes for the encoding. The combination of Precoder 920 and convolutional Trellis Encoder 910 provides eight possible states and eight possible outputs. The output at a particular time depends upon the state of Precoder 920 and convolutional Trellis Encoder 910 when the input was received at the inputs 930 and 940.
Referring now to
The operation of one instance of Trellis Encoder 910 is demonstrated in
The ATSC-M/H data bursts are designed for the transmission over a noisy channel, and the M/H data are received along with less robust legacy A/53 data in an interleaved manner. As described above,
In an M/H receiver, it may not be easy to keep tracking the state of the trellis decoder while receiving less robust legacy A/53 signals. If the legacy A/53 data are not recoverable, at the beginning of the reception of a sequence of M/H data or M/H preambles, the receiver may be entirely unaware of the state of the trellis at each transition from A/53 to M/H data or to the preambles.
Although it may be possible to reset Trellis Encoder 165 to a predetermined state during the encoding process at each transition from the legacy A/53 data to the M/H data or preambles, this would require many resets to occur during each data segment since the data stream has already been interleaved by Byte Interleaver 160 as shown in
Here, it is advantageous to infer the state of Trellis Encoder 165 at the start of each sequence of M/H data or preamble bytes rather than to force a reset. The state of Trellis Encoder 165 may be established statistically at the receiver end, using the knowledge of the trellis structure, the received trellis encoded data, and the predetermined values of the preamble data that are input to Trellis Encoder 165.
Determination of the trellis state is an integral part of trellis decoding. A variety of algorithms exist for decoding trellis-coded data. A sequential decoding mechanism, like the Fano algorithm, or a maximum likelihood algorithm like Viterbi decoding, or a maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) may be used.
These algorithms function without prior knowledge of the data that was trellis encoded. Only the estimate of the received data and the knowledge of the trellis or convolutional code are required for decoding, assuming noise levels and other errors are within the correction capabilities of the code. However, if the decoder has knowledge of the data per se, such knowledge may be used advantageously to speed up the trellis decoding process. More specifically, such knowledge would reduce the number of trellis paths that are assessed or would decrease the number of iterations of the algorithm to more efficiently determine the position of the trellis. As mentioned above, the M/H preambles contain the predetermined data known to the receivers. By using the predetermined knowledge of the preamble, it is possible to determine the trellis state quickly when the reception of the M/H burst begins.
Referring now to
In one embodiment of the present invention, turbo codes are utilized for the ATSC-M/H data. Turbo codes are decoded using the MAP algorithm. Turbo decoding with the MAP algorithm is possible in the ATSC-M/H system disclosed herein due to the use of the 12/52 rate mode along with the convolutional interleaver as described with respect to
Referring now to
MAP Trellis Decoder 1310 has a soft input 1360 and an a priori input 1365. The soft input 1360 accepts a probability for each of the eight possible values of the trellis-encoded input symbol, estimated from the received signal. The a priori input 1365 accepts a probability for each of the four possible decoded output symbol values. MAP Trellis Decoder 1310 produces both a soft output 1375 and a hard output 1370. The soft output 1375 is provided for Interleaver 1330. The output of Interleaver 1330 is provided for the soft input 1380 of Decoder 1320. It is noted that the output of Interleaver 1330 is not provided for the a priori input 1385 of Decoder 1320 but provided for the soft input 1380. Decoder 1320 also produces two outputs—a soft output 1395 and a hard output 1390. The soft output 1395 is fed to Inverse Interleaver 1340 to form the MAP feedback loop. The hard output 1390 of Decoder 1320 produces the final two-bit result for each symbol after a number of iterations of the algorithm.
The a priori input 1365 of MAP Trellis Decoder 1310 usually receives an input representing the probabilities of the four possible values of the decoded symbol. However, it is important to be noted that the correct pre-encoding values of the symbols are determined during the reception of training data as the preamble data are already known to the receiver. Thus, instead of feeding the output of Inverse Interleaver 1340 to the a priori input 1365, a probability distribution representing the certainty about the training data 1350 (i.e., preamble data) may be fed to the a priori input 1365 whenever the preamble data is received to improve the function of Turbo Decoder 1250.
This arrangement may be conceptualized as being achieved with a selector 1355 that selects between the predetermined training data (i.e., preamble data) probabilities and the probabilities from the feedback loop 1345. The predetermined training data probabilities are selected when a preamble is received. When receiving preamble data, the predetermined value of each symbol may be assigned to a probability of 1, while the remaining possibilities are assigned to a probability of 0.
With the a priori input 1365, representing certainty about the values of the decoded symbols, and the soft input 1360, representing the estimated probabilities of the eight possible encoded values of the symbol, the algorithm will converge quickly to determine the state of the trellis and produce a hard output 1390 representing the estimated value. These values and the determined trellis state are also then used in the determination for future symbols, including those that are not part of the training data.
While the present invention has been described in terms of a specific embodiment, it will be appreciated that modifications may be made which will fall within the scope of the invention. For example, various processing steps may be implemented separately or combined, and may be implemented in general purpose or dedicated data processing hardware. Furthermore, various encoding or compression methods may be employed for video, audio, image, text, or other types of data. Also, the packet sizes, rate modes, block coding, and other information processing parameters may be varied in different embodiments of the invention.
This application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §365 of International Application PCT/US2008/011711, filed Oct. 14, 2008 which was published in accordance with PCT Article 21(2) on Apr. 23, 2009 in English and which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/998,978 filed Oct. 15, 2007; provisional patent application No. 60/998,961 filed on Oct. 15, 2007; provisional patent application No. 60/999,040 filed on Oct. 15, 2007; provisional patent application No. 61/190,499 filed on Aug. 29, 2008; provisional patent application No. 61/190,516 filed on Aug. 29, 2008 and provisional patent application No. 61/190,517 filed on Aug. 29, 2008
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/011711 | 10/14/2008 | WO | 00 | 4/13/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/051693 | 4/23/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3652998 | Forney, Jr. | Mar 1972 | A |
3873920 | Apple et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
4677625 | Betts et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4881223 | Debuysscher | Nov 1989 | A |
5012491 | Iwasaki | Apr 1991 | A |
5050164 | Chao | Sep 1991 | A |
5087975 | Citta et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5353313 | Honea | Oct 1994 | A |
5369641 | Dodt et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5398073 | Wei | Mar 1995 | A |
5438369 | Citta et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452009 | Citta et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5469448 | Denissen et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5534938 | Citta et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5572532 | Fimoff et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5600677 | Citta et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5629958 | Willming | May 1997 | A |
5636251 | Citta et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5687182 | Shikakura | Nov 1997 | A |
5761303 | Hobbs et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5809242 | Shaw et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5978855 | Metz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6072810 | Van der Puttel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079041 | Kunisa et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6407993 | Moulsley | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6493402 | Fimoff | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6559894 | Omura et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563436 | Fimoff et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6614847 | Das et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625775 | Kim | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6687310 | Bretl et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714563 | Kushi | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721771 | Chang | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725411 | Gerlach et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734920 | Ghosh et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6754170 | Ward | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6762698 | Bretl et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765508 | Bretl et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771197 | Yedidia et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6772184 | Chang | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6806816 | Fimoffl | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6823489 | Wittig et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6851085 | Kim et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861964 | Breti et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865712 | Becker et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6924753 | Bretl et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6985092 | Bretl et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6987543 | Mogre et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996133 | Bretl et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006566 | Birru | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016409 | Unger | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7042908 | Mayer | May 2006 | B1 |
7042949 | Omura et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7046694 | Kumar | May 2006 | B2 |
7085324 | Choi et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110048 | Weiss | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7187698 | Bretl et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194047 | Strolle et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197685 | Limberg | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203165 | Kowalewski | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7215714 | Bretl et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7260109 | Ovard et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7337386 | Chang et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346107 | Choi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7620074 | Yasuda et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7675994 | Gaddam et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712011 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7715491 | Yu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7822139 | Simon | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7860128 | Niu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7933365 | Choi et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7983354 | Park et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8054842 | De Heer et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8094727 | Hong et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8149939 | Limberg | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8151174 | Betts | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8374126 | Kitaji et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8495695 | Kim et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8553723 | Clerget et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010024457 | Barry et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010050926 | Kumar | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055342 | Fimoff | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020027947 | Kanterakis et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040460 | Choi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020053049 | Shiomoto et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054634 | Martin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020154247 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154248 | Wittig et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172275 | Birru | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181581 | Birru et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191712 | Gaddam et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194570 | Birru et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012290 | Fimoff et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021341 | Vigil et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039318 | Tong et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041256 | Wee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030081692 | Kwan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099303 | Birru et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103575 | Birru et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108129 | Voglewede et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112879 | Antia et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128746 | Lerner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140345 | Fisk et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154441 | Nieminen | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030227906 | Hallman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030227913 | Hallman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030227943 | Hallman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040047367 | Mammen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040090997 | Choi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050002416 | Belotserkovsky et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018691 | Riedl et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050059436 | Addy et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050138521 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152411 | Breti et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160347 | Kim et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180369 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050184887 | Jaffe et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193408 | Sull et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193425 | Sull et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203927 | Sull et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204385 | Sull et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210145 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050276259 | Nakabayashi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060045191 | Vasanth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064716 | Sull et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060104348 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060140301 | Choi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060212782 | Li | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212902 | Seo et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060244865 | Simon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060246836 | Simon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253890 | Park et al. | Nov 2006 | A9 |
20070002871 | Pekonen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025450 | Jin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070076584 | Kim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070076586 | Kim et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094567 | Park et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070116152 | Thesling | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140271 | Amante et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140369 | Limberg | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153914 | Hannuksela et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168844 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183525 | Park et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195889 | Hong et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211661 | Tee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211671 | Cha | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211769 | Lee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230564 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070230607 | Yu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256001 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277210 | Yousef | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002765 | Song et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080101493 | Niu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112502 | Limberg | May 2008 | A1 |
20080273619 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090044230 | Oh et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090128711 | Kim et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100226443 | Citta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231803 | Citta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232495 | Citta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238995 | Citta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246663 | Citta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246664 | Citta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100299699 | Citta et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100329328 | Kontola et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2534435 | Mar 2005 | CA |
1351797 | May 2002 | CN |
1575549 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1757190 | Apr 2006 | CN |
1954607 | Apr 2007 | CN |
0822722 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0853407 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0999709 | May 2000 | EP |
1056236 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1237319 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1276288 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1437910 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1528702 | May 2005 | EP |
1533727 | May 2005 | EP |
1657835 | May 2006 | EP |
1693981 | Aug 2006 | EP |
990250 | Aug 2000 | FI |
08237614 | Sep 1996 | JP |
9005352 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9224224 | Aug 1997 | JP |
11196072 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001274774 | Oct 2001 | JP |
200432467 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004519952 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-328356 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004328356 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005328334 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005328397 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006515964 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007-214856 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007214856 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2009524944 | Jul 2009 | JP |
100277764 | Jan 2001 | KR |
20010087406 | Sep 2001 | KR |
20020027293 | Apr 2002 | KR |
20060057266 | May 2006 | KR |
20080092195 | Oct 2008 | KR |
WO9851111 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO0018055 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0035136 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0048052 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0074375 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074375 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0191407 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0221784 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO02080559 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02093754 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO02100026 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO2004015998 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004023818 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004062183 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2005020576 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005076218 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2005115001 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2005122574 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006001635 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006104519 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2006126841 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2007024275 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007046674 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007046677 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007099978 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2008014522 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008144001 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2008144002 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2008144003 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2008144004 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2008144005 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Richer et al, “The ATSC Digital Television System,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 94, No. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 37-43. |
Henderson John G.N. Et Ali: “ATSC DTV Receiver Implementation”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, No. 1. pp. 119-147, Jan. 2006. |
Citta, Richard et al : ATSC Transmission System: VSB Tutorial, Symposium Handouts, Montreuz Symposium, Jun. 12, 1997 pp. 1-17. |
Wu, Yiyan et al: “An ATSC DTV Receiver With Improved Robustness to Multipath and Distributed Transmission Environments”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 32-41, Mar. 2004. |
Park, Eui Jun et al: “Supplementary Reference Sequence VSB System”, Consumer Electronics 2007; Digest of Technical Papers Publication Jan. 10-14, 2007, pp. 1-2. |
Kim, Seung-Won et al: “Enhanced-x VSB System Development for Mobile/Portable Reception”; IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Published May 2005, Issue 2, pp. 419-423. |
Bretl, Wayne et al: ATSC RF, Modulation, and Transmission, Proceedings of the IEEE, Issue 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 44-59. |
Malinowski, Simon et al: Synchronization Recovery and State Model Reduction for Soft Decoding of Variable Length Codes, ieee transactions on information theory, Published Jan. 2007, vol. 53, Issue 1, pp. 368-377. |
Zhong, Yang et al: 64 QAM Trellis Decoding With Channel State Information, Published in ASICON 2001, 4th International Conference on ASIC Proceedings, pp. 420-423, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ. |
Search Report dated Nov. 2, 2009. |
Sun et al.:“Global Motion Vector Coding (GMVC),” ITU-Telecommunication Standardization Sector, doc. VCEG-O20, Dec. 4, 2001, pp. 1-6. |
ATSC STD., “A/53: ATSC Digital Television Standard, Parts 1-6, 2007,” Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc., Jan. 3, 2007, 136 pages. |
“ATSC Digital Television Standard, Doc. A/53,” ATSC Digital Television Standard, Apr. 12, 1995, pp. 1-74. |
“ATSC Digital Television Standard Part 2—RF/Transmission System Characteristics (A/53, Part 2:2007),” Online Document A/53, Part 2:2007, Jan. 3, 2007, pp. 1-44. |
DAVIC, “Lower Layer Protocols and Physical Interfaces”, Digital Audio-Visual Council, DAVIC 1.3.1 Specification Part 8, 1998. |
Delay, “Broadband Data Delivery Over Television Networks”, Digital and Computational Video, Proceedings, Feb. 8-9, 2001, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 36-43. |
Digital Video Broadcasting, “DVB-H Implementation Guidelines”, DVB Document A092 Rev. 2, May 2007. |
ISO/IEC 13818-1, “Transport Stream Packet Layer”, ITU-T Rec. H.222.0, 1996. |
Jacobsmeyeter, “Introduction to Error-Control Coding”, Pericle Communications Col, Internet Article. |
Kratochvil et al., “DVB-H Standard and Testing of its Mobile Terminals,” Radioelektronika, 17th International Conference, Brno, Czech Republic, Apr. 24-25, 2007, IEEE Apr. 24, 2007, pp. 292-296. |
Roweis, “Equivalent Codes & Systematic Forms”, Internet Article, Nov. 9, 2005. |
Seshadri et al., “Channel Coding for Cochannel Interference Suppresion in Wireless Communication Systems”, Internet Article, Retrieved on Sep. 9, 2008. |
Simpson, “Video Over IP, A Practical Guide to Technology and Applications”, Elsevier-Focal Press, 2006, pp. 259-265. |
Tang et al., “Viterbi Decoder for High-Speed Ultra-Wideband Communication Systems”, ICASSP 2005, 2005 IEEE. |
De Castro, Fernando CC, et al. “8-VSB channel coding analysis for DTV broadcsat.” Consumer Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 46.3 (2000): 539-547. |
ATSC “ATSC Recommended Practice: Proram and System Information Protocol Implementation Guidelines for Broadcasters,” ATSC, Jun. 25, 2002, pp. 1-44. |
ATSC “ATSC Recommended Practice: Program and System Information Protocol Implementation Guidelines for Broadcasters,” ATSC, Jun. 25, 2002, pp. 45-93. |
Clark et al., “Error Correction Coding for Digital Communications,” Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1981, Chapter 2, Group Code pp. 50-61. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP); Telechnical Specification Group Radio Access Network Multiplexing and Chemical Coding (FDD) Oct. 1, 1999, pp. 12-13. |
Max, Sebastien, et al, “OFDM-UWB Physical Layer Emulation for Event-Based MAC Simulation,” Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 17th Int'l Symposium on IEEE, Sep. 1, 2006, p. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,355) Non-final rejection dated Sep. 12, 2013. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,391) Final Rejection dated Sep. 9, 2013. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,985) Final Rejection dated Jun. 20, 2013. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,391) Non-final rejection dated May 7, 2013. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/733,961) Final Rejection dated Jan. 14, 2013. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/734,149) Final Rejection dated Dec. 20, 2012. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,985) Non-final Rejection dated Oct. 1, 2012. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,355) Final Rejection dated Sep. 13, 2012. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,757) Final rejection dated Aug. 2, 2012. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,734) Final Rejection dated Jun. 21, 2012. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/733,961) Non-final Rejection dated Mar. 2, 2012. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,734) Non-final Rejection Feb. 1, 2012. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,757) Non-final Rejection dated Dec. 23, 2011. |
WO Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 12/734,154 dated Feb. 17, 2010. |
WO Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 12/733,961 dated Dec. 15, 2009. |
WO Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,985 dated Nov. 27, 2009. |
WO Seach Report for U.S. Appl. No. 12/734,149 dated Sep. 11, 2009. |
WO Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,355 dated Oct. 7, 2008. |
WO Search Report for PCT/US08/006335 dated Oct. 7, 2008. |
WO Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,391 dated Oct. 7, 2008. |
WO Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,734 dated Oct. 7, 2008. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,757) Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 27, 2013. |
WO Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,757 dated Oct. 7, 2008. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,355) Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 19, 2012. |
(U.S. Appl. No. 12/734,149) Non-final Rejection dated Apr. 6, 2012. |
Lehtoranta et al.: “Detecting Corrupted Intra Macroblocks in H.263 Video,”IEEE, 2002, pp. 33-36. |
“Generalized Parity Check Codes,” 1981, pp. 50-61. |
Morigana et al, “New Concepts and Technologies for Achieving Highly reliable and high-capacity multimedia wireless communications systems,” IEEE Comm Magazine, vol. 35 No. 1, Jan. 2007. |
EP Search Report for EP14164486 dated Aug. 5, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,391 Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,391 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 19, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,391 Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Sep. 3, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,734 Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,734 Notice of Allowability dated Nov. 27, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,734 Notice of Allowability dated Sep. 4, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,757 Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 27, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/599,757 Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 28, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,985 Non-Final OA dated Dec. 30, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,985 Notice of Allowance dated May 13, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/682,985 Corrected Allowability dated Sep. 5, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/734,149 Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/734,149 Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 18, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/734,149 NOA dated Aug. 18, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/734,149 dated Mar. 2, 2015. |
Chinese Search Report for related CN Application No. 2008800161398 dated Jan. 24, 2013. |
CN Search Report for related CN Application No. CN200880111809.4 dated Jun. 24, 2013. |
CN Search Report for related CN Application No. 200880111809.4 dated Feb. 13, 2012. |
CN Search Report for related CN Application No. CN 200880016135.X dated Dec. 4, 2013. |
CN Search Report for related CN Application No. CN200880016135X dated Jun. 28, 2013. |
CN Search Report for related CN Application No. 200880016135.X dated Oct. 15, 2012. |
CN Search Report for related CN Application No. 2008801118075 dated Aug. 2, 20121. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100296576 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60998978 | Oct 2007 | US | |
60998961 | Oct 2007 | US | |
60999040 | Oct 2007 | US | |
61190499 | Aug 2008 | US | |
61190516 | Aug 2008 | US | |
61190517 | Aug 2008 | US |