Calcination Processes. Cement production process (precalciner).
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently published a Special Report on CO2 Capture and Storage (IPCC, 2006), which reviewed the existing technologies and those under development for capturing the CO2 generated by large stationary sources and its subsequent confinement in a number of deep geological formations. As said Report shows, in 2002 cement production was responsible for 5.8% of all the total CO2 emissions into the atmosphere from stationary sources (sources that emit over 0.1 MtCO2/year). As in the electricity sector, the capture and storage of CO2 at cement plants results in a drastic reduction in CO2 emissions. The additional cost of this operation can be compensated for in places where a CO2 emissions market operates, as is the case in Europe, when the cost of capturing and storing CO2 is lower than the cost of CO2 in said trading market. Minimising the cost of CO2 capture remains the key to ensuring that these technologies reach the stage where they are commercially viable in the medium term.
The object of this invention relates to systems for the continuous calcination of a stream of solids rich in CaCO3. For example, the process serves to precalcine the large amounts of limestone that are used for the large-scale production of cement. It is also applicable, with some small modifications, to other commercial processes that use calcination to produce lime (e.g. for SO2 retention at power plants). The fundamental object of this invention is, therefore, to bring about calcination and use a solid stream that is rich in CaCO3 to produce a pure or almost pure stream of CO2 that can be permanently stored away from the atmosphere.
The application of CO2 capture and storage technologies involves first obtaining a stream with a high concentration of CO2, which is subjected to supercritical conditions for its ultimate storage in deep geological formations (IPCC, 2006). In the case of the cement industry, the post-combustion or oxy-combustion CO2 capture technologies that are applicable to fossil fuel power plants are theoretically applicable to the cement industry (IPCC, 2006). There is little information available about how to put these processes into practice at cement plants and how much it could cost. However, CO2 capture technologies are being developed as part of energy production systems based on carbonatation-calcination cycles that generate a purge of CaO (Abanades et al, 2005 Env. Sci. Tech. 39,2861). By replacing the CaCO3 that is supplied to the cement plant for this purge of deactivated sorbent (predominantly CaO), it is possible to achieve a considerable energy saving at the cement plant (Abanades et al, 2005 Env. Sci. Tech. 39,2861). However, these processes are still in their research and development stage and are mainly designed for the generation of electricity or H2.
Patent P200200684 discloses a process for the capture of CO2 by carbonatation which claims the use by the calciner of part of the heat generated in the combustion chamber to maintain the endothermic calcination reaction and regenerate the sorbent. In one of its applications, it also claims a method of carrying out the heat exchange indirectly by means of an inert solid circulating between the two chambers. In particular, this heat exchange system for the regenerator has also been disclosed with the use of the sorbent itself (i.e. CaO particles) as a means of transferring heat from the combustion chamber to the calciner. In these systems of CO2 capture by carbonatation, the calcined material must circulate to the carbonator to react with CO2 again (Abanades et al, 2005 Env. Sci. Tech. 39,2861).
However, the process proposed in the present invention focuses only on the capture of CO2 contained in the continuous flow of limestone that supplies a cement plant. Since no stage of carbonatation or CO2 capture from a gaseous stream is required, the calcination conditions can be those most suited to the production of CaO to supply the cement plant. In the precalciner disclosed in this invention there is a concentrated stream of CO2 that originates only from the CaCO3, and a stream of calcined material (CaO). The described process does not contemplate the capture of CO2 generated by combustion with air of the fuel in the combustion chamber wherefrom the calcination heat comes. However, it must be stressed that in modern cement plants, with a rational use of energy, around 3/4 of the CO2 that is emitted comes from the CaCO3 used as a raw material for manufacturing cement, which means that this technology can have a high impact on the reduction of C02 emissions in cement plants.
It is a new precalcination method for a material with a high CaCO3 content to produce a stream of calcined material and a pure or easily purified stream of CO2. The method is based on using the heat generated in a circulating fluidised bed combustion chamber to reheat a CaO stream that flows from the calciner, continuously circulating between the burner and calciner, which transfers heat from the combustion chamber to the calciner to maintain the endothermic calcination reaction. The CO2 generated by this calcination process, in a pure or easily purified form (mixture of CO2 and H2O), is in a suitable state for confinement away from the atmosphere after a series of compression, transport and storage stages, which are the same for all CO2 capture and storage systems.
The object of the invention comprises a combustion chamber where any type of fuel is burned with air, preferably at temperatures above 1000° C., generating heat and a stream of flue gases, the composition of which depends on the fuel and the excess of air used in the combustion, which is not relevant to the object of this invention.
The invention is based on the possibility of maximising the amount of heat generated in the combustion chamber, which is transferred to the calciner to maintain the endothermic calcination reaction of the CaCO3 that is used as a raw material to manufacture cement (forming CaO and CO2) by means of a CaO stream that circulates between the burner and the calciner, releasing heat in the calciner and being reheated in the burner. The calciner must work at temperatures above 900° C., preferably at almost 950° C., in order to ensure sufficiently fast calcination reactions, which makes it possible for the solids to remain in the calciner for a short time, thus resulting in more compact calciner designs. Optionally, to increase the calcination speed and increase the thermal gradient between the burner and the calciner, it is possible to reduce the partial pressure of CO2 in the calciner by applying vacuum to the calciner, as claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,748,010A, and/or by injecting steam into the calciner, as claimed in P200200684. The calciner is run under these conditions to generate a pure stream of CO2 at a lower pressure than atmospheric pressure, or a CO2/steam mixture that is easily separated by condensing the steam (not included in
From the point of view of transferring solids between the different units and separating the solids from the gases that carry them, the units are interconnected using equipment and methods that form part of the prior art of technologies used in gas/solid fluidised bed systems.
The object of the invention is shown in diagram form in
It can easily be shown with balances of materials and energy that a greater preheating of the streams that enter the system (air, fuel and limestone supply) with heat from the high-temperature streams that leave the system (fumes, CO2, CaO product) increases the system's calcination capacity. It is therefore important to have the necessary auxiliary equipment (heat exchangers) to achieve the maximum degree of preheating of said streams that enter the system. However, these auxiliary systems for preheating solids and gases are not considered an object of this invention, as they are part of the prior art of circulating fluidised systems and cement production systems. Other evident possibilities for supplying and extracting solids from the system are not considered in
The total flow of solids that circulates between the burner and the calciner is determined, among other factors, by the amount of CaCO3 to be calcined, the heating capacity of the fuel used in the burner, the temperature difference between the burner and the calciner, the temperatures to which the streams entering the system (air, fuel and CaCO3 supply) have been preheated with the heat of the streams leaving the system (fumes, CaO product and CO2). It can be shown (see example) that it is possible to run the system with values for the circulation of solids between the burner and the calciner that are acceptable for circulating fluidised bed systems (10-50 kg/ni2s) with reasonable values for all the previous variables.
An applicable example will now be described, with reasonable intervals of operating conditions for the case in which the system is used as a precalciner of limestone rock (primarily CaCO3) to produce two concentrated streams of CaO and CO2. In the following example the main purpose of the precalcination product (CaO) is considered to be for the production of cement.
The main units described in the example are shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
P200600845 | Mar 2006 | ES | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/ES2007/070063 | 3/23/2007 | WO | 00 | 3/18/2009 |