This application relates to a precision means for creation of microblades along the edge of a cutting blade. A number of abrasive based sharpening devices have been described in patents by these inventors and others for the purpose of creating ultrasharp knife edges. Such edges are ideal for the wide range of applications where the sharpest edges are important. Examples of such applications include razor blades, scalpels, and microtome blades for optimal cutting of ultrathin slices of harder non-fibrous materials. The cross section of edges suitable for such applications show that the edge facets meet at a very precise point or terminus which is less than a few microns in width and for use in ultramicrotomes the edge width is commonly as small as 50 angstroms. Generally for such precision slicing the edge as seen in linear profile is commonly very straight and free of imperfections greater in size than the edge thickness.
There are however a range of applications involving relatively softer fibrous material such as meats, fibrous muscle, and fibrous vegetables where small imperfections along the edge profile and across the terminous of the edge facets can facilitate the cutting of such materials.
This application discloses precision means of creating micro imperfections of controlled size and frequency along the edge of blades to be used for cutting of such softer fibrous materials. A wide range of serrated blades are sold with deliberate and large mechanical serrations machined along the edge of the blade for cutting of similar materials and especially those with a hard crusty nature where the cutting is improved by the saw-like action of such blades. Such serrations if large, result in substantial visual tearing and fragmenting of the substance being cut.
This application describes highly precise mechanisms and devices that for the first time offer controlled means for preparing reproducibly edges of high geometric precision with microblades at the terminus of the edge facets and along the edge profile. Such imperfections can range in size from a fraction of a micron up to more than 100 microns. Imperfections of this size can function as microblades especially if the microblades are confined largely within the geometric confines of the facets and within the geometric extensions of the original facets to the point where they would otherwise meet to form an edge of thickness generally less than 20 microns.
Knife manufacturers have for generations offered a variety of elongated steel rods (often referred to as “steels”) to align the blade edge. For the vast public these have proven extremely difficult or impossible to use because of the inability of the user to manually control either the angle of contact with the edge facet, the directionality of the blade, or the pressure applied by the steel to the blade edge. Because few, if any individuals have the skill needed to move the knife blade reproducibly at a consistent angle and pressure against the rod stroke-after-stroke, the use of these tools for improving the cutting ability of an edge has been very limited. From a practical viewpoint most individuals are alarmed by the potential danger of seriously cutting themselves while manually swinging a sharp blade against the rod. Consequently the advantages sought by this means have not in reality become achievable by the average cook or general public.
Use of the manual steel rod has been more of a mystique than a science, lacking any scientific base or understanding. It has been said for example that the manual rods “smooth out microscopic nicks in the blades surface and realigns the molecules in the cutting edge”. Also one reads that “the best steels are magnetized to help draw the molecules into realignment,” or “the alignment of molecules in a knife blade are reinforced whenever it is sharpened, . . . and the process removes very little actual metal from the blade.” Others repeat that the use of a steel “realigns and smoothes the knife's edge”.
It is clear to anyone founded in science and physics that the force of magnetism incorporated in commercial sharpening rods is far too feeble to have any effect at the atomic level in steel and even too feeble to alter the physical structure of any burr attached to the edge.
A number of manual rod-type sharpening devices have been described in issued U.S. patents including:
U.S. Pat. No. 5,046,385 to Ivo Cozzini; U.S Pat. No. 2,461,690 to K. K. Leong; U.S. Pat. No. 4,799,335 to Silvio R. Battachi; U.S. Pat. No. 4,197,677 to Louis N. Graves; U.S. Pat. No. 4,094,106 to Thomas D. Harris; U.S. Pat. No. 4,090,418 to Shigyoshi Ishida; U.S. Pat. No. 5,163,251 to David Lee. For a variety of individualized reasons none of the prior art devices have proven to be a practical means of reproducibly modifying the physical structure along a cutting edge. None of these cited patents include means to orient with sufficient precision or consistency the angle of the edge facet relative to the hardened surface of a steel rod or other material needed to achieve the results reported in this application. Where there is an effort in the prior art to provide a guide for the knife the means used is angularly inconsistent or inaccurate because of variations in blade geometry, blade height, thickness of blade, etc. or because the accuracy of the means is inherently very poor and variable stroke to stroke.
Commonly in the prior art the angle of the facet as presented to a hardened surface is totally dependent on operator skill. Consequently these designs lack the precision and reproducibility discovered by these inventors to be necessary for creating an optimum and consistent structure of microblades along the cutting edge of blades irrespective of the geometry and size of the blade geometry or the skill of the user of such devices.
The edge conditioning mechanism disclosed here depends among other things upon highly accurate angular referencing of a blade's edge based on the most reproducible feature of a blade, namely the planes defined by the large faces of the blade that can be held in precise alignment on a flat physical plane to insure the required angular accuracy, independent of variations in other physical features of the blade.
The invention is based on the discovery that when the linear edge of a sharpened knife blade is pressed against or dragged along a hardened surface (hardness preferably above Rockwell C-60 but in any event preferably harder than the blade edge) in the general direction of the edge linear axis in a carefully controlled manner so that the plane of the edge facet adjacent to the hardened surface is positioned consistently at an angle, optimally only a few degrees from the plane of the hardened surface with an appropriate force against that surface a surprising sequence of events takes place along that edge. Contrary to popular belief, the burr created during the preceding sharpening step is not straightened but first is deformed, removed, cracked, or pressed against one side of the edge and ultimately fragmented as micro sections along the edge are broken off leaving a microserrated edge. The burr may be removed, pressed against the first facet or it can be moved to the opposite side of the edge and pressed against that facet. This physical action of moving the burr fragments from one side of the edge to the other or pressing them against the edge causes serious breaks and irregularities along the edge structure of a size ranging from a few thousandths of an inch to as little as 1 micron. As one then continues to stroke the blade edge facets repeatedly across an appropriate hardened surface at the same consistent small relative angle, micro facets are established at the terminus of the larger facets and a small microserrated structure is created. Study of this process has shown that if the angular relationship between the hardened surface and the contacting edge facet is closely and consistently controlled and the applied pressure is regulated the average size and frequency of the microstructure along the edge of a given knife surprisingly is quite reproducible each time the process is repeated. Because dimensions of the microstructure is extremely small, the resulting edge—so created—is razor sharp yet an edge that cuts fibrous materials exceedingly well. As described later, the nature of the edge structure can be modified by altering the angular relationships but a consistent and predictable result depends critically on precise control of the angle on each stroke along the knife edge.
As described earlier both the precision of the physical geometry along the cutting edge of a blade and the existence of microstructure along the edge can play significant roles in the cutting ability of blade depending on the nature of the material being cut. Near perfect geometry of the edge formed by the facets that support that edge is important if one wishes to cut thin slices or to control more precisely the course or path of an edge as it penetrates the material being cut. Even greater geometric edge perfection is necessary for cutting ultra thin slices of stiffer and harder materials. Likewise for cutting of softer fibrous materials geometric perfection is important if one wishes to cut extremely thin slices, however, the existence of a series of microblades or microimperfections along an edge can be an added advantage to cut softer fibrous materials that can otherwise deform slightly under the pressure of cutting and thus offer resistance to being severed by a smoother more perfect geometric edge. For these reasons the most versatile cutting edge for the softer materials is one with controlled imperfections or microblades along an edge that otherwise has a high degree of geometric perfection. Without the geometric perfection it becomes more difficult to cut thin sections. Without edge imperfections, cutting of fibrous materials is more difficult. For these reasons close control of all factors affecting this edge conditioning step are important in order to optimize the profile of the final edge and any imperfections or microblades created along that edge.
By repeating the step of pressing alternately one side and then the other side of the edge against a hardened surface on the order of 10-20 times, at a precisely controlled angle, the attachment of the burrs to the terminus of the facets is broken and remaining pieces of the burr are broken off leaving an edge structure similar to that shown in
The microteeth thus created along the knife edge can improve the effectiveness of cutting a range of materials including fibrous foods.
The process of pressing slidingly the edge against the surface of a hardened material as it is moved in a direction approximately in line with the axis of the edge and with a consistent precisely controlled angle stroke after stroke between the plane of that surface and the plane of the facet can be repeated hundreds or thousands of times before the knife edge facets need to be resharpened (reangled). This is particularly so if the angle between the facet and the hardened surface is small—for example in the range of 3-10 degrees. The repetitive contacting causes the remaining edge structure to work harden and as a consequence repeatedly fracture leaving ultrafine microteeth along the edge. It is important to understand that the mechanism and accuracy of alignment must be sufficiently precise that the area of contact along the edge's facet is rigorously confined to the lower portion of the facet very close to the edge. However, as this rubbing process is repeated hundreds or thousands of times, the repeated fracturing along the edge removes an initial row of microteeth along the edge and another new replacement row of microteeth are formed along the remaining edge structure. This process must be precisely controlled by the use of angle guides and preferably with the assistance of means to hold the blade face securely against the guides—otherwise one poorly aligned contact stroke along the edge can wipe out much of the microstructure and render less effective the cutting ability of the edge. As this process is repeated, microamounts of metal are removed along the edge by repeated fracturing along the edge and by microshearing along the lower portion of the facet surface. As the edge itself is repeatedly stress hardened, fractured, and broken off the width of the blade facet (as measured perpendicular to the edge) is shortened but at the same time the line or area of actual contact between, for example a cylindrically shaped hardened surface and the facet surface slowly lengthens requiring that a slightly greater pressure be applied between the facet and the hardened surface in order to remove microamounts of metal from the facet and to maintain sustained and adequate contact with the edge and its fracturing microstructure. At that point it may become more economical of time and effort for the user to conclude that the edge needs to be resharpened in order to provide a more favorable relative angle between the lower portion of the facet and the surface of the hardened material. This mechanism is described in greater detail in subsequent sections.
The micro nature and precision of this edge conditioning process becomes evident by recognizing that initially this operation is confined entirely to the lower 1%-10% of the facet adjacent to the edge. The facet on a relatively new knife is commonly only about 0.025″ (0.6 mm) wide. This means that the initial area of contact with the hardened surface is confined to that area of the facet within about 0.002″ (0.05 mm) of the edge itself. As the facet is pressed repeatedly hundreds of times across a corresponding area on the hardened surface the area of the facet in contact does slightly increase because of a wearing action close to the edge and that area in contact will ultimately extend upward on the facet toward the shoulder where the facet meets the face of the blade. As that process continues the force applied to the blade is distributed over a larger area of the facet and the stress level applied at the point closest to the edge is reduced. However, whenever the blade is used for cutting, lateral distortions of the microteeth do occur which increases the lateral stress on these teeth during subsequent reconditioning and thereby contributes to the continuing removal and reestablishment of microteeth along the stressed and stress hardened edge.
The microprecision nature of this novel conditioning process is emphasized by realizing that the amount of metal removed along the edge of a 10 inch blade as a result of a thousand controlled strokes along that edge is miniscule and only about 5-10 milligrams of steel.
It is important to recognize that this controlled repetitive action described here to develop microstructure along the edge is radically different from conventional sharpeners that use skiving actions to remove an entire facet, quickly in just one or a few strokes, and to thereby establish new facets and a new knife edge. The conventional skiving devices are analogous to conventional sharpening devices that are designed to form a new edge by removing in entirety the old facets and replacing them with new facets commonly created at a poorly defined angle. The variety of available skiving sharpeners includes those that utilize a very sharp edge of a hardened material such as silicon or tungsten carbide to remove at uncontrolled angles substantial amounts of metal in a single stroke and to completely replace the entire facet in a very few strokes. These skiving devices also are available with interdigitating sharply edged wheels or corners of hardened metal or ceramics. They do not include means of precise angle control and hence are not suitable and unsatisfactory for precise edge conditioning of the type described herein.
The inventors have discovered that this new micro manipulative means of creating microteeth along a cutting edge must be precisely controlled if results are to be optimized. For best results the angle of contact B,
The edge of
The inventors have been able to demonstrate that if the angle B,
Attempts to condition a freshly sharpened faceted edge by moving the knife manually and striking its edge against a hardened surface without precise control of the angle of contact between the surface of the facet and the hardened surface quickly compromises or destroys the quality of the microstructure created along the edge and results in edges with far less than optimum cutting ability. Further, the repeated contact at differing angles and from differing directions on successive strokes interferes with the orderly formation of the microstructure and an optimum edge is never obtained. The edge must consequently be resharpened more frequently and the life of the blade is shortened. Consistent use of a precise angle guide for the blade stroke-after-stroke is necessary in order to avoid; (a) striking the blade at an angle less than angle A,
It is critical therefore to control angle B,
It is important to emphasize the novelty and value of providing in a single apparatus both a precise means of sharpening the edge facets at a very precise angle A relative to the plane of the blade face and a means of conditioning the sharpened edge by repeatedly pressing the lower portion of the facets so created against the plane of a hardened surface at a very precise and sustained angle B optimally only a few degrees larger than angle A. This unique combination insures the angular control necessary to optimize the fracturing of the edge structure and creation of the highly regular microserrated structure along the edge. By incorporating both of these critical steps in the same apparatus, the critically important required angular relationships can be insured.
As illustrated in various figures, such as
The guide surface described here can be extended flat surfaces or a series of two or more rods or rollers arranged to define an extended plane on which the blade can rest as its edge facets are being sharpened or conditioned in contact with a hardened surface.
Hardened member 13 can be cylindrical, oval, rectangular or any of a variety of shapes. That member preferable will have a hardness greater than the blade being sharpened. The radius of its surface at the line or points of contact can be designed to optimize the pressure applied to the blade edge as it is forced into contact with that surface. That effective radius at the line or area of contact can be the result of the macro curvature of the hardened member or the result of micro structure such as grooves and ribs at that point. For best results such grooving, ribbing or ruling along the surface should be approximately perpendicular to the line of the edge being conditioned and in any event the alignment of the grooves or rulings preferably cross the line of the edge. The invention can be practiced with the axis of such ribbing at an angle other than perpendicular, including tilting the ribbed surface or spiraling the ribs to establish an alternate angle of attack.
In creating the optimum edge structure by the novel and precise means described here the hardened contact surface 13 will initially make contact with the facet only at the extremity of the facet 2,
It was found that localized axial ribbing along the surface of the hardened member is a convenient way to create an appropriate localized level of stress against the facet and the edge without damaging the microteeth being formed. The ribs, however are preferably individually rounded and not terminated in an ultra sharp edge that can remove metal too aggressively and consequently tear off the microteeth. The level of force must be adequate to stress the microteeth and generate fracturing below the roots of the microteeth and permit their removal and replacement after the cutting edge is dulled from use. The depth of such ribbing must also be controlled in order that such ribs can not remove a significant amount of metal along portions of the edge facets.
The hardened member 13,
The mechanism of
As mentioned earlier herein the surface of the hardened member can be embossed, ruled or given a structure or patterning that will create higher but controlled localized pressures and forces to be applied along the knife edge in order to assist in removal of the burr structure and creation of microstructure where it is otherwise necessary to apply greater manual forces on the blade itself. Such microstructure might include a series of hardened shallow fine ribs, for example 0.003 inch to 0.020 inch apart, on the surface of the hardened member where the axis of the individual ribs is preferably aligned perpendicular to but in any case at a significant angle to the line of the edge as it contacts the hardened surface. Preferable such ribs should be shallow so that they can not remove excessive amounts of metal from the facets adjacent the microstructure being formed. The plane of such ribs defined by the plane of the area, points or line of contact adjacent the contacting blade facet must, however, be maintained at the optimum angle B as described herein in order to realize the optimum microstructure. The optimum size of such ribs depends in part on the hardness of the blade material.
Possible geometries for the hardened surface needed to create the edge microstructure described here can include repetitive geometric features with small radii on the order of a few thousandths of an inch. It is important, however to understand that the conditioning step described here is not a conventional skiving operation which normally will remove, reangle or create a new facet without regard for the detailed and desired microstructure along the edge itself. Instead this invention is a precision operation to remove carefully the burr of a knife, that previously has been sharpened conventionally, by pressing the knife edge against the surface of a hardened material at a precisely controlled angle B to that surface with enough pressure to progressively and significantly remove the burr., to fracture the edge at the point of burr attachment and to create a relatively uniform microstructure along the edge. It would be counterproductive to skive off the entire facet (or to reangle the entire facet) which, like coarse and aggressive sharpening would create a new facet and recreate a conventional burr along the edge and leave a very rough and unfinished edge.
This invention is a unique means to condition a conventionally sharpened edge so that a highly effective microstructure is established along the edge while simultaneously maintaining a relatively sharp edge as defined by its geometric perfection.
A high degree of precisely repetitive micromanipulation is necessary to create this favorable type of edge. In addition to the need to establish precisely the angle between the surface of the facet and the surface of the hardened material at the point of contact, it is critical to insure that this angle of attack is maintained on each and every stroke of the knife edge along its entire length. The angle of attack must be maintained with a repetitive accuracy of approximately plus or minus 1 to 2 angular degrees. Such precise repetition is necessary to avoid seriously damaging the microteeth or altering the nature of edge structure being created along the edge. Further the pressure applied by the knife facet against the hardened surface must be optimized in order to avoid breaking off prematurely the newly formed microteeth. The force developed along the edge of the facets by the repetitive sliding contact smoothes the sides of the microteeth but stresses them and strains them in a manner that repeatedly fractures their support structure at a depth along the edge significantly below the apparent points of their attachment. This repetitive process leads ultimately to the removal of the microteeth and their replacement with a new row of microteeth created by the repetitive fracturing of the supporting edge structure below each “tooth”. The amount of force exerted against the microteeth on each stroke is dependent upon the downward force on the knife blade as applied by the user. It is important to realize that the localized force against the microteeth can be very large because of the wedging effect at the blade edge between the elongated angled knife guide and the hardened surface. The force that must be applied by the user is consequently relatively. modest and certainly less than if the force had to be applied directly in the absence of a knife guide. It would be very difficult to apply consistently this level of force to the knife edge by any manual non-guided stroking procedure.
In general the hardened material should not be an abrasive. The described processes removes the burr, creates microteeth along the edge and wears micro amounts of metal from the facet adjacent the edge by basically a non-abrasive process. The rate of metal removal by any abrasive can easily be too aggressive compared to the miniscule amounts of metal that will be removed while creating and recreating the ordered line of microteeth along the edge.
The edge conditioner illustrated in
As mentioned earlier, the hardened surface should not have an inherent tendency to abrade. The surface should not be coated with conventional aggressive larger abrasive particles of materials such as diamonds, carbides or abrasive oxides. These materials when in sizable particulate form typically have extremely sharp edges that give them aggressively abrasive qualities. However, these same materials are extremely hard and when prepared in large planar form and highly polished are essentially non-abrasive. The edge conditioning process disclosed here relies on precisely applied angular pressure by a hardened surface against the facet at its edge in order to repeatedly create and fracture a microstructure along the edge at the extreme terminus of the facets. The process of repeatedly rubbing the knife facet and edge structure against the harder surface stress hardens the facet adjacent to the edge, fractures the edge below the edge line and deforms the metal immediately adjacent to the edge. The metal along the lower portion of the facet adjacent the edge is deformed, smeared by the localized contact pressure and microsheared as a result of the very small differential angular alignment of the plane of the hardened surface and the plane of the edge facet. Thus the localized contact pressure slowly fractures the microteeth along an edge and slowly and selectively re-angles the lower portion of the facet to conform closely to the plane of the hardened surface. It is clear that if the differential angular alignment is too great or if there is any true abrasive action at the edge the microstructure that otherwise would be slowly created and recreated will be prematurely abraded away and destroyed. The rate of facet deformation and metal removal adjacent the edge must be minimized in order that the microstructure has time to develop and be protected from direct abrasion. The amount of wear along the lower portion of the facet that can occur from the inherent roughness of the hardened surface in the low micron range appears acceptable. Surface roughness (as contrast to dimensions of small repetitive geometric features) greater than about 10 microns will in some cases depending on pressures and the rate of microtooth development be about the practical limit in order that such roughness does not lead to excessive metal removal while the optimum microstructure is being created. Consequently it is important that the hardened surface not have significant abrasive quality.
Because it is important to control angle B between the plane of the sharpened facet along the edge and the surface at point of contact with the hardened surface, in the optimal situation it is important as described above to control both angle A of the facet (
The U-shaped guide spring 22 mounted to cost 28 to hold the blade face securely against the guide surfaces 23 of
The hardened member 13 is supported on structure 19 that is positioned forward of drive shaft 34 or slotted to allow uninterrupted passage and rotation of shaft 34 which is supported at its end by bearing assembly 35 supported in turn by structure 37 attached to base 31. Structure 19 likewise is part of base 31 or a separate member attached to base 31. Hardened member 13 supported by and threaded onto rod 18 in this example can be displaced laterally when contacted by the blade cutting edge facet, the amount of such displacement being controllable by selection of appropriate durometer and design of the O-Rings, 20. Alternatively member 13 can be mounted rigidly on structure 19, to be immobile, but that alternative requires slightly more skill by the user to avoid applying excessive force along the cutting edge.
Experience with an apparatus as illustrated in
The cutting ability of a knife edge depends on a variety of factors but most important are the geometric perfection of the edge and the nature of any microstructure along the edge that can contribute to the effectiveness of cutting certain materials, especially fibrous materials as related herein. The manual and powered devices described in this disclosure are designed to optimize and control the creation of a desirable fine microstructure along the edge. In the process of creating this microstructure the burr remaining from prior sharpening is progressively removed until it is virtually all removed leaving the microstructure. As shown in
In
Fresh areas of the surface on the hardened member 13 can be exposed by rotating the member on the threaded section of rod 18. While not shown, a hold-down spring such as spring 22 would generally be incorporated to press the face of blade 3 securely against the plane of elongated guides 24 in order to insure accurate angle control during the edge-conditioning process.
Fresh areas of the surface on the hardened member 13 can be exposed by rotating the member on the threaded section of rod 18. While not shown, a hold-down spring such as spring 22 would generally be incorporated to press the face of blade 3 securely against the plane of elongated guides 24 in order to insure accurate angle control during the edge-conditioning process.
The surface of disks in both the first stage 25 and the third stage 27 can, for example be sections of truncated cones. In determining the precise angles of contact in these stages it is important to establish the vertical angle between the plane of the surface of the guide and the plane of the surface on the abrasive surface at that point of knife-edge contact with the blade facet. The guides 23, 24 and 21 are elongated to permit accurate angle control as the face of the blade is moved in intimate contact with the elongated plane of the guide face. The disks 38 and 38a rotated on shaft 34 at for example about 3600 RPM can move laterally by sliding contact with the shaft against the restraining force of spring 40. By allowing the disk to move in this manner slidingly away from the knife facet as that facet is brought into contact with the surface of the disk, the opportunity for the abrasive to gouge the knife edge or to damage the microstructure is substantially reduced. As in the earlier
To use this apparatus the motor is energized and the blade is pulled several times along the guide plane with the edge facet in contact with the rotating disks 9 and 9a while alternating pulls in the left and right guides 23 of stage 1 until the facets and a burr are developed along the blade edge. The knife is then pulled along elongated guide plane 24 with the facet in contact with hardened member 13, a number of times alternating pulls along the left and right guides 24 of stage 2. The knife can then be used for cutting or it can first be pulled rapidly once along the left and right guides of stage 3 holding the blade edge in contact with the rotating disks 38 and 38a. Stage 3 must be used sparingly so as not to remove the microstructure along the edge. When the effectiveness of the blade is reduced from cutting, the blade edge can again be conditioned in stage 2. The edge can be reconditioned many times before it must again be sharpened in stage 1 as described above.
The preceding descriptions discloses number of skill-free means for reproducibly creating a uniquely uniform microstructure along the edge of a sharpened blade where the means incorporates a highly precise angular guiding system for the blade so that very narrow areas of the blade facets adjacent the edge can be repeatedly moved across a hardened surface at exactly the same angle, stroke after stroke. This highly controlled action stress hardens the lower portion of the facets within about 20 microns of the edge causing fractures to occur in a reproducible manner in that small zone adjacent to the edge which in turn causes microsections of the edge to drop off along the edge leaving a highly uniform toothed structure along the edge. The teeth so created are commonly less than 10 microns high and are spaced along the edge every 10 to 50 microns. These dimensions are comparable to or substantially less than the width of a human hair. The several apparatus already described herein operate by moving the knife edge against the hardened surface. A similar result can be realized by moving the hardened surface along the edge of a stationary knife edge but only if the angle of the hardened surface at the point or area of contact is held at precisely the same angle stroke after stroke. For optimum results the angular difference between the plane of the edge facet and the contact plane of the hardened surface should be on the order of 3-5 degrees and preferably less than 10°.
If the angular difference exceeds 10° the nature and frequency of the microteeth changes significantly and the cutting ability of the resulting edge is adversely affected. Above 10° the microteeth are individually smaller, the spacing of teeth becomes less regular and at increasing angles the total number of substantial teeth is reduced. Further and importantly, at larger angle B the edge width W is greater and the edge is not as sharp. The advantages of keeping angle B small, for example, below 10° is clearly evident. It is also clear that in order to keep the conditioning angle C within such close proximity to the sharpening angle A on each and every conditioning stroke it is necessary to use precision guiding means. That is the only way the results described here can be obtained.
Two examples of an apparatus that creates similar microstructures by movement of a hardened surface along the edge of a blade at a controlled angular difference between the plane of the edge facet and the plane of the hardened surface are shown in
The hardened member 13 is attached adjustably to post 46 which is mounted on pedestal 47 that can move slidingly along the angled base member 48. As the hardened member 5 is so moved manually along base member 48 in sliding contact with the lower portion of the upper facet 2 adjacent the edge, the amount of pressure applied to the edge facet by the hardened surface can be controlled by the user by pushing the hardened member with more or less force against the facet. The base member 48 is designed to support the blade 1 which is clamped to the upper platform 58 of base 48 by means of clamp 50 and an attachment screw 56.
In a second example of an apparatus incorporating a moving hardened surface 5,
This application is based on provisional application Ser. No. 60/457,993, filed Mar. 27, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1075690 | Buck | Oct 1913 | A |
1181161 | Perry | May 1916 | A |
1681763 | Eaton | Aug 1928 | A |
2098530 | Battocchi | Nov 1937 | A |
2249218 | Meade | Jul 1941 | A |
2559273 | Brinkley | Jul 1951 | A |
2645066 | Andrews | Jul 1953 | A |
2652667 | Claude | Sep 1953 | A |
2896482 | Thomas | Jul 1959 | A |
3332173 | McMaster | Jul 1967 | A |
3619955 | Fischback | Nov 1971 | A |
3819170 | Longbrake | Jun 1974 | A |
4170343 | Longbrake | Oct 1979 | A |
4441279 | Storm et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4486982 | Longbrake | Dec 1984 | A |
4512112 | LeVine | Apr 1985 | A |
4538382 | Johannsen | Sep 1985 | A |
4602531 | Korhonen | Jul 1986 | A |
4611437 | Cohen | Sep 1986 | A |
4627194 | Friel | Dec 1986 | A |
4714239 | LeVine | Dec 1987 | A |
4716689 | Friel | Jan 1988 | A |
4777770 | LeVine | Oct 1988 | A |
4799335 | Battocchi | Jan 1989 | A |
4807399 | Friel | Feb 1989 | A |
D303209 | Friel | Sep 1989 | S |
4897965 | Friel | Feb 1990 | A |
4912881 | McDougall | Apr 1990 | A |
D310620 | Friel | Sep 1990 | S |
5005319 | Friel | Apr 1991 | A |
D328410 | Friel | Aug 1992 | S |
5148634 | Bigliano et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5185958 | Dale | Feb 1993 | A |
5199225 | Esposito | Apr 1993 | A |
5245791 | Bigliano et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
D342003 | Friel et al. | Dec 1993 | S |
D348598 | Friel et al. | Jul 1994 | S |
5357717 | Friel et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5390431 | Friel | Feb 1995 | A |
D357395 | Friel | Apr 1995 | S |
5404679 | Friel et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5440953 | Gangelhoff et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449315 | Friel et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458534 | Campione et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
D368217 | Friel | Mar 1996 | S |
5582535 | Friel | Dec 1996 | A |
5582542 | Stein | Dec 1996 | A |
5611726 | Friel et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5636556 | Friedlander | Jun 1997 | A |
5667427 | Airhart | Sep 1997 | A |
D388304 | Friel | Dec 1997 | S |
5868611 | Friel | Feb 1999 | A |
D408254 | Friel et al. | Apr 1999 | S |
D409891 | Friel et al. | May 1999 | S |
6012971 | Friel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6113476 | Friel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6267652 | Friel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6371841 | Ray | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6726551 | Friel | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6863600 | Friel | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875093 | Friel et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7052385 | Swartz | May 2006 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040198198 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60457993 | Mar 2003 | US |