The invention generally relates to preconditioning spins near a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) region.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) may be used to determine properties of a sample, such as body tissue (for medical imaging purposes) or a subterranean formation (for well logging purposes). For example, for the subterranean formation, NMR may be used to determine and map the porosity, formation type, permeability and oil content of the formation.
Referring to
The NMR measuring process is separated by two distinct features from most other downhole formation measurements. First, the NMR signal from the formation comes from a small resonance volume, such as generally thin resonance volume 20a (see FIG. 2), and the resonance volume 20a may have a radial thickness that is proportional to the magnitude of a {right arrow over (B)}1 magnetic field (not shown). Depending on the shape of the resonance zones, the volume may extend, as an example, from as little as 1 millimeter (mm) in one direction and as long as several inches in another. Secondly, the NMR measurement may not be instantaneous. Both of these facts combined make the NMR measurements prone to tool motions, such as the NMR tool 6 moving around the periphery of the borehole 3, as further described below.
To perform the NMR measurements, the NMR tool 6 may include permanent magnets to establish a static magnetic field called {right arrow over (B)}0 (not shown); a radio frequency (RF) coil, or antenna, to radiate the time varying magnetic field {right arrow over (B)}1 that is perpendicular to the {right arrow over (B)}0 field; and an RF coil, or antenna, to receive spin-echoes from the formation in response to an NMR measurement, as described below. These two coils may be combined into a single transmit/receive antenna.
As an example, the NMR tool 6 may measure T2 spin-spin relaxation times of hydrogen nuclei of the formation 10 by radiating NMR detection sequences to cause the nuclei to produce spin-echoes. The spin-echoes, in turn, may be analyzed to produce a distribution of T2 times, and the properties of the formation may be obtained from this distribution. For example, one such NMR detection sequence is a Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence 15 that is depicted in FIG. 4. By applying the sequence 15, a distribution of T2 times may be obtained, and this distribution may be used to determine and map the properties of the formation 10.
A technique that uses CPMG sequences 15 to measure the T2 times may include the following steps. In the first step, the NMR tool 6 transmits the {right arrow over (B)}1 field for an appropriate time interval to apply a 90° excitation pulse 14a to rotate the spins of hydrogen nuclei (that are initially aligned along the direction of the {right arrow over (B)}0 field) by 90°. Although not shown, each pulse is effectively an envelope, or burst, of an RF carrier signal. After the spins are rotated 90° from the direction of the {right arrow over (B)}0 field, the spins immediately begin to precess in the plane perpendicular to the {right arrow over (B)}0 field at first in unison, then gradually losing synchronization. For step two, at a fixed time T following the NMR pulse 14a, the NMR tool 6 pulses the {right arrow over (B)}1 field for a longer period of time (than the NMR pulse 14a) to apply an NMR refocusing pulse 14b to rotate the precessing spins through an additional angle of 180° with its carrier phase shifted by ±90°. The NMR pulse 14b causes the spins to resynchronize and radiate an associated spin-echo 16 (see
The T2* time characterizes a time for the spins to no longer precess in unison after the application of the 90° excitation pulse 14a. In this manner, at the end of the 90° excitation pulse 14a, all the spins are pointed in a common direction perpendicular to the static B0 field, and the spins precess at a resonance frequency called the Larmor frequency for a perfectly homogenous field. The Larmor frequency may be described by {right arrow over (ω)}0=γ{right arrow over (B)}0, where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, a nuclear constant. However, the {right arrow over (B)}0 field typically is not homogenous, and after excitation, the spins de-phase with T2* due to inhomogenieties in the static {right arrow over (B)}0 field. This decay is reversible and is reversed by the refocusing pulses 14b that cause the echoes. In addition, irreversible de-phasing occurs (spin-spin relaxation) and is described by the T2 time constant. This results in the decay of successive echo amplitudes in the CPMG sequence according to the T2 time constant. With “inside-out” NMR, typically, spins are measured with T2 >>T2*.
As stated above, the distribution of the T2 times may be used to determine the properties of the formation. For example, referring to
Each T2 time typically is computed by observing the decay of the spin-echoes 16 that are produced by a particular CPMG sequence 15. Unfortunately, the drill string 5 (see
Polarization-based measurements may use either inversion recovery sequences or saturation recovery sequences. With the saturation recovery sequences, the spin system is saturated, e.g. with several 90° pulses that reduce the magnetization to zero. The spin system is then allowed to recover for a variable length of time prior to applying a monitor pulse or pulse sequence, such as the CPMG sequence. The inversion recovery technique suggests that after the nuclei have aligned themselves along the static magnetic field, a 180° pulse is applied to reverse the direction of the spins. Over time, the spins decay toward their equilibrium direction according to T1, but no measurement is yet made as the 180° pulse does not induce a signal in the detector. Before the decay is complete, however, it is interrupted by a monitor pulse or pulse sequence, such as the CPMG sequence, which rotates the spins into the measurement plane (i.e., induces a signal in the detector). The information of interest is the amplitude of the signal immediately after the initial 90° “readout” pulse. This amplitude clearly depends on the recovery time between the initial 180° pulse and the 90° pulse. Following a determination of amplitude, the spin system is permitted to completely relax back to equilibrium, and the pulse sequence is then repeated.
An example of a downhole use of inversion recovery sequences is described in Kleinberg et. al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,551, entitled, “Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Pulse Sequences For Use With Borehole Logging Tools,” granted Jun. 11, 1991. However, the inversion recovery sequences described in the '551 patent do not use adiabatic pulses and therefore result in a narrow region of investigation. Also, under “inside-out” conditions in conjunction with motion, it may be easier to saturate a region than to invert it completely. Therefore, saturating a region may be preferred.
Referring back to
As an example, a polarization-based measurement may be used to measure the T1 times for hydrogen nuclei in the resonance volume 20a located within the saturated volume 20b (see FIG. 2). In this manner, the NMR tool 6 may first saturate spins within the saturated volume 20b. However, the polarization period may be sufficiently long to permit the NMR tool 6 to significantly move within the borehole. In that case, tool 6 movement causes the resonance volume 20a to shift and causes the NMR tool 6 to receive spin-echoes from a shifted resonance volume 20a′ (see
One way to saturate a larger region is described in PCT Application Ser. No. PCT/US97/23975, entitled “Method For Formation Evaluation While Drilling,” filed on Dec. 29, 1997. This application discloses, at the start of a measurement, transmitting one or more radio frequency pulses covering a relatively wide range of frequencies and/or extra wide bandwidth or using one or more pulses which are frequency swept to saturate a cylindrical volume around an NMR tool. The application further describes the use of acceleration peak values to determine when to invalidate measurements due to movement of the tool beyond the extent of the saturated region, the application further describes fitting the tool with stand-offs to prevent movement of the tool beyond the saturated region.
Thus, there is a continuing need for minimizing error introduced by relative motion between an NMR measurement apparatus and a sample being investigated.
A method for use with an NMR measurement apparatus that is subject to relative motion between the apparatus and a sample is disclosed. The apparatus, the sample, or both elements may be subjected to motion. In one embodiment of the invention, the method comprises radiating a first sequence of RF pulses. The first sequence has an envelope. The envelope is varied during the radiation of the first sequence to substantially saturate a first region of the sample. A second sequence of RF pulses is radiated to establish a resonance region within the first region and measure an attribute of the sample.
In another embodiment, a method for use with an NMR measurement apparatus that is subject to relative motion between the apparatus and a sample comprises using an RF carrier signal to radiate a first sequence of RF pulses. The carrier signal has a phase. The phase is varied during the radiation of the first sequence to substantially saturate a first region of the sample. A second sequence of RF pulses is radiated to establish a resonance region within the first region and measure an attribute of the sample.
In yet another embodiment, an NMR measurement apparatus that is subject to relative motion between the apparatus and a sample comprises at least one magnet to establish a static magnetic field, a first coil, a second coil and an pulse generator. The pulse generator is coupled to the first and second coils and adapted to use the first coil radiate a first sequence of RF pulses to create a time varying magnetic field. The first sequence includes at least one refocusing pulse to produce at least one echo from a resonance region of the sample. The pulse generator is further adapted to use the second coil momentarily modify the static magnetic field at least one time during the radiation of the first sequence to cause saturation of a region larger than the resonance region.
In a further embodiment, a method for use with an NMR measurement apparatus that is subject to relative motion between the apparatus and sample includes using an inversion recovery sequence which comprises at least one or more adiabatic pulses.
Other embodiments of the invention will become apparent from the description, from the drawing and from the claims.
Referring to
As examples, the process 50, as further described in more detail below, may be used for purposes of mapping the properties of subterranean formations and may also be used in other applications (other “inside out” NMR applications, for example) in which relative motion occurs between a sample and an NMR measurement apparatus. The NMR measurement apparatus, in some embodiments, may include electromagnetic field generating members (a coil, an electromagnet and a permanent magnet, as examples) to generate at least two magnetic fields: a magnetic field called {right arrow over (B)}0 (not shown) and a magnetic field called {right arrow over (B)}1 (not shown) that is substantially perpendicular to the {right arrow over (B)}0 magnetic field. Referring to
The carrier frequency of the {right arrow over (B)}1 field may be generally represented by ω0. The transmission of the {right arrow over (B)}1 field creates a resonance region that has a radial thickness, in terms of frequency, that is determined by the gradients of ω0 and ω1 in the excited region where {right arrow over (ω)}1 is the projection of γ·{right arrow over (B)}1 onto the {right arrow over (B)}0 field. In some embodiments, the {right arrow over (B)}0 field may also be generated (at least partially) by gradient coils 40 and 42 to cause the {right arrow over (B)}0 field to have a component that varies with a low frequency, as described below. The NMR tool 60 may also include processing circuitry may include a pulse generator 65, for example, that is coupled to coil(s) (such as the coils 39, 40 and 42, as examples) and adapted to radiate the {right arrow over (B)}0 and/or {right arrow over (B)}0 fields in a manner described below.
In principle, each polarization based NMR measurement includes the three building blocks 52, 54 and 56 (see FIG. 7), and one or more measurements may be used to obtain each T1 value. However, the detection sequence (i.e., the block 52) may be used to accomplish the saturation (i.e., perform the functions of block 56) and thus, eliminate the block 52 if two requirements are met: the measurements are successively repeated (called “stacked” experiments), and the signal detection sequence 68 completely destroys the magnetization for the next measurement. If this technique is used, the results from the first measurement are discarded, as the first measurement is performed with an incorrect polarization time. Alternatively, excitation may be performed adiabatically by applying an adiabatic fast passage pulse into the resonance zone just prior to the application of the detection sequence.
Other variations from the three basic blocks 52, 54 and 56 are also possible. As another example, the sequence block 54—block 56—block 52 may also be used to perform each measurement, and this variation may advantageous from a programming point of view. When using the second variation, the first measurement is discarded. Other variations of the process 50 are possible as long as the functions of the block 52, 54 and 56 are achieved.
Another variation of basic blocks 52, 54 and 56 includes blocks 51 and 53. At block 51, radiation of a sequence of RF pulses is initiated. This block 51 may further include the step of identifying a first set of pulse characteristics four the sequence of RF pulses. Next, at block 53, an enhanced saturation region is generated according to a number of different embodiments disclosed herein, The enhanced saturation region may be generated by varying certain or multiple RF pulse characteristics or through the effect of the motion of the NMR tool, both discussed in more detail below. From block 53, control proceeds to the basic blocks 52, 54 and 56, after completion of which, control returns to block 51.
The goal of the saturation, regardless of whether the saturation is being performed by an explicit saturation sequence or by a detection sequence, is to saturate a large region, or volume, with radio frequency (RF) irradiation. As described below in more detail and illustrated by simulations, depending on the particular embodiment, the saturation may be created by applying a sequence of RF pulses, such the CPMG detection sequence, that is tailored to achieve the desired saturation using the motion of the NMR tool 60; by slowly varying a characteristic of the sequence over time with or without motion of the NMR tool 60; by stochastically varying the characteristics of the sequence with or without motion of the NMR tool 60; or by using a combination of these techniques.
A simple CPMG sequence having constant parameters develops sharp saturated regions, called “holes,” in the spin distribution. The holeburning is far reaching, but only leads to weak saturation since the holes are well separated from each other. Furthermore, once the magnetization at the positions of the holes is destroyed, continuing the sequence may not increase the saturation further. The motion of the NMR tool 60 may increase the saturation density by “sweeping” these holes over the saturation volume, as described further below.
The CPMG detection sequence may be modified to increase the number of refocusing pulses above the typical number (10, for example) of refocusing pulses that are necessary to measure the initial amplitude of the echo train. This method works well, if motion of the NMR tool 60 during the polarization time is always coupled with motion of the NMR tool 60 during the detection sequence. However, unfortunately, unsatisfactory saturation may occur if the NMR tool 60 is stationary during the detection sequence 68 but moves during the polarization time. Simulations (discussed below) show that this problem may be avoided by slowly changing characteristics of the sequence over time to expand the saturated region, even in the absence of tool motion, as further described below. In this context, the phrase “characteristic of the sequence” may generally refer to an envelope of the sequence or a phase of the RF carrier frequency, as examples. As examples of the possible ways to vary the envelope, the envelope may include pulses 120 (see
The characteristics of the detection sequence (i.e., the sequence used for purposes of saturation) may be varied not only slowly but also in an uncorrelated, or stochastic, manner from pulse to pulse, as further described below. The stochastic extremum is the irradiation of incoherent noise. The stochastic variation of the characteristics is to be contrasted to the slow variation of the characteristics in which the saturation affects are far reaching because the coherent, non-stochastic characteristics of the sequence dominate. As a result, slow variation of the characteristics may result in far off resonance holes being incrementally burned by consecutive pulses. The spots where saturation is created during a short time interval are well separated from each other. However, the stochastic variations cause consecutive pulses of the sequence to not contribute to the same hole and saturation creation is spread out more evenly for short time intervals. As a result, the stochastic variation of the pulses generally provides a more consistent saturation density. As described below (and illustrated by simulations), these two techniques may be combined to enhance the performance of the sequence. As also described below, if motion is present that is fast enough to sweep holes over the distance that separates adjacent holes during only a few pulses, the coherent element of the sequences is destroyed, and a sequence with slowly varied characteristics may perform similarly to a sequence with stochastically varied characteristics.
As described below, the flip angles of the refocusing pulses in the CPMG sequence may not need to be large to create off-resonance saturation if coupled with some other variation (variation of the phase of the carrier frequency, for example). Therefore, by shortening the RF pulses, the power necessary for saturation may be decreased. For sufficiently short pulses, the influence of the hole burning is negligible. This being the case, the free evolution period between pulses may be dropped, and saturation may be achieved in much shorter time. In the limit of very short pulses, this technique results in irradiation of incoherent noise whose structure can be designed to fit the needs. In practice, the finite rise and fall times of the pulses set the lower limit of the pulse duration. There may be a tradeoff to be made between time and power necessary to achieve saturation and saturation bandwidth, as described below.
In the following, an example of saturation using a CPMG sequence with and without slow motion induced changes in {right arrow over (ω)}0 is discussed in detail. Although this description specifically refers to a CPMG sequence, as an example, the above-described hole burning may be accomplished by all multi-pulse sequences that feature a large number of repetitions of a building block of pulses.
The repeated coherent pulsing during a CPMG sequence excites selected spins with Δω>>ω1, where ω1 is approximately equal to the radial thickness of the resonance volume, and Δω (the distance in frequency space) may be specifically defined by the following equation:
Δω=γ{right arrow over (B)}0−ωrf,
where ωrf is the RF frequency of the B1 field for the first CPMG sequence.
The excitation steps become smaller and smaller with increasing Δω, but the excitations sum up from pulse to pulse, in the holes for significant amounts. Because the transverse magnetization decays in accordance with T2, the selected spins become “saturated.” The separation (called Δωh) of these holes is determined by the periodicity of the sequence. Nonnegligible pulse duration and off resonance effects cause some deviation, so the Δωh separation of the holes is approximately described by the following:
where te is the echo spacing from the beginning of one refocusing pulse to the beginning of the next refocusing pulse.
Coupled with relaxation, the simple CPMG sequence technique results in hole burning at certain off resonance frequencies. It may not be possible to measure in between the burned holes, because the width Δωs of the measurement region extends over Δωs≈2ω1, which for 180° refocusing pulses of duration tp becomes Δωs≈π/tp. Since te is always greater than tp, Δωs>Δωh and there may be several holes burned into a resonance region. To calculate the extent of the signal loss, the field geometries, the relaxation times and the detection bandwidth must be taken into account.
To illustrate the distribution of holes,
i.e., the change in the {right arrow over (B)}1 field is negligible in the neighborhood of the resonance region. For an axisymmetric gradient geometry, the horizontal scale (Δω/ω1) is proportional to the difference in radiuses (of the resonance region) between the first and second measurements. The above assumption that ω1 is a constant is a valid approximation when the difference in radiuses is much smaller than the radius, a fact that justifies the choice of a constant flipangle in the plot.
As can be seen from
Tool motion during the first CPMG sequence may result in an increased loss in nearby resonance regions. For example,
The resulting relative signal amplitudes (i.e., Mz/M∞) 88, when averaging over a (rectangular, for purposes of the simulation) shell of width ±0.75ω1 is shown in FIG. 17. From top to bottom, the amplitudes 88 represent the result for k=1, 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, 91. Note that the loss increases with echo number and for more than 10 echoes becomes much stronger than the saturation effect without motion of the NMR tool 60, as shown in
It is assumed above that the pulses in the CPMG sequences are perfectly rectangular pulses. However, real “rectangular” pulses may never reach this ideal but may be subject to finite rise and fall times. This limits the width of the frequency spectrum contained in the pulses. At far off resonance, the width of the burned holes and the speed of burning them becomes proportional to the amplitude of the frequency component of the pulse at the position of the hole. Therefore, in some embodiments, far off resonance hole burning may be less effective than in the simulations described above.
For the pulses discussed in this application, a wide frequency distribution is beneficial. Therefore, in some embodiments, rectangular pulses with the shortest possible rise and decay time constants may be preferred. Furthermore, the saturation region can be optimized by varying the shape of the pulse envelope to adapt the frequency content of the pulse.
In general, far reaching saturation in the absence of motion may be created by irradiating a repetitive multipulse sequence with varying parameters and broad band pulses. If the pulse sequence parameters are slowly varied while the sequence is applied, the positions of the burned holes move slowly over the spin distribution and increase the saturation. Varied pulse sequence parameters include:
variation of the pulse separation, te,
variations of tp,
variations of {right arrow over (ω)}1 by, as examples, pulse amplitude, field direction and carrier frequency, ωRF,
variation of {right arrow over (ω)}0, and
variation of the pulse phase.
Variations of combinations of these parameters and variations of other parameters are also possible. Variations in {right arrow over (ω)}0 and {right arrow over (ω)}1 may be caused by actual variations of the {right arrow over (B)}0 and {right arrow over (B)}1 fields (e.g., variation of magnet and antenna spacings or orientations and/or rf power) or by relative motion of sample and the NMR tool 60. In this manner, relative motion of the sample with respect to the NMR tool 60 may stem from motion of the sample (e.g., fluid flow or diffusion) or from tool motion.
Another way to vary {right arrow over (ω)}0 is to vary the static field with the help of an electromagnet, or “gradient coil.” For example, referring back to
To vary the {right arrow over (B)}0 field, NMR tool 35 may include gradient coils, such as coils 40 and 42, that also circumscribe the sleeve 28. The coils 40 and 42 may be pulsed with a DC current (by a pulse generator, such as the pulse generator 65) to produce an additional component, {right arrow over (B)}2, to the {right arrow over (B)}0 field. {right arrow over (B)}2 is substantially radial if the currents in coils 40 and 42 flow in opposite directions. The coils 40 and 42 may be positioned between the magnets 32 and 34 so that both coils 40 and 42 contribute a positive component to the {right arrow over (B)}0 field that may or may not be substantially aligned with the {right arrow over (B)}0 field in the region of interest, depending on the embodiment. In some embodiments, the coils 40 and 42 may be formed either from a pair of single or multi-turn current loops with currents equal in magnitude and opposite in direction of circulation. For example, the coils 40 and 42 may form a saddle coil.
Other embodiments that use the gradient coils 40 and 42 in conjunction with a radial, axisymmetric {right arrow over (B)}0 design are possible. For example, referring to
Arrangements other than the radial, axisymmetric {right arrow over (B)}0 designs described above are also possible. For example, gradient coils may be used with two-dimensional (2-D) dipolar {right arrow over (B)}0 designs. An example of a 2-D dipolar {right arrow over (B)}0 design may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,280,243, entitled “System For Logging a Well During the Drilling Thereof,” granted Jan. 18, 1994, issued to Melvin Miller. In this manner, an NMR tool 68 that uses a 2-D dipolar {right arrow over (B)}0 design may include an annular magnet 72 that establishes a dipole pattern for the {right arrow over (B)}0 field as shown in
Thus, as a result of the above-described arrangements, the spins precess around {right arrow over (ω)}0+{right arrow over (ω)}0gradient. The largest effect occurs if both vectors are parallel. Thus, as a result of this technique, Δω may be varied without varying ωrf. This is advantageous to varying ωrf because the bandwidth of an antenna with high quality factor limits the range of possible variation for ωrf (without retuning the antenna, which is impractical during a saturation sequence at least if it is done by switching capacitors using mechanical switches). In some embodiments, a drawback of this method may be the relatively large amount of energy needed for driving the electromagnet (compared to the use as an imaging device) if it must be fired with varying amplitudes throughout the saturation sequence. There are several ways to use the gradient coil (or coils):
Other uses of the gradient coil are possible.
The pulse train characteristics of the CPMG sequence may also be stochastically varied. For example, the phase of the RF carrier pulse may be randomly varied to randomly to create 0°, 90°, 180° and 270° pulse phases (at least these pulse phases are available in typical NMR spectrometers), as examples. Referring to
As can be seen, the saturation burns wide and well-separated stripes into the spin distribution. The width of the saturated region is smaller than the width of the region created by the motion influenced CPMG sequence, but the saturation profile is much smoother than the one created with a CPMG sequence. This indicates a tradeoff between the extent of the resonance region (using coherent features) and reliable quantitative saturation profile (using stochastic features). It should be noted that the profiles created by a CPMG sequence will provide a smoother shape too for spins with T1,2 (here 100 ms) <<tm (here 50 ms), where tm is the duration of the CPMG sequence. The occurrence of motion during application of the random phase sequence slightly increases its performance, but the profile stays smooth.
The stripes of incomplete saturation occur because not every hole is burned with the same “speed.” Depending on the position Δω, some holes may even be completely suppressed as can be seen, as an example, in
This effect is illustrated in
Again, in general the saturation effect of the pulse sequence may be optimized for a particular range of motion by varying the various parameters of the sequence, like te, which is about inversely proportional to the separation of the burned holes, tp, the pulse phases, etc. and trading off between coherent and stochastic features.
The previous examples of saturation sequences used the far-off-resonance hole burning effect to create saturation. As stated above a pulse of duration tp rotates a spin that is off resonance through the angle α(Δω) which is always bigger than the nominal flip angle α(0). Therefore for refocusing pulses with α(0)=180° (i.e., “180 degree pulses”), it always holds α(Δω)>180° for off resonance. On the other hand, optimal excitation and thus, optimal excitation off resonance occurs if α(Δω)=(2n+1)·180°. Then the effective flip angle through which a spin is turned away from the longitudinal axis is θ=θmax withθmax=α(Δω)=2 arctan
being the maximum effective flip angle for a given Δω. Therefore using 180° pulses to create off resonance saturation may waste energy.
The minimal pulse duration that can be used with a given hardware is determined by the rising time constant (called tr) of the pulse. If tp<3tr then the pulse does not reach the maximum ω1 before it is switched off and it rapidly becomes less effective when tp is reduced further. For a well logging NMR apparatus a good estimate is tr=5 . . . 30 μs.
When tp decreases, the saturated region becomes broader. Of practical interest is mainly the region with |Δω|<
that is, the region with α(Δω)<2π within the two inner unsaturated nodes. The maximum flip angle θmax decreases with increasing Δω. Therefore, the wider the saturation region, the more pulses are needed to create saturation in the outer parts of the region. If the time constant for saturation is Ts, then only spins with T1>Ts can be saturated fully. Therefore, a tradeoff may be made between saturation bandwidth and lowest T1 that still can be saturated. Also this shows that, in some embodiments, it is advantageous to keep the sequence as short as possible by minimizing tfree to the lowest possible value that can be obtained with the available hardware (the hardware problems here may include phase switching time, pulse rising and falling times and overloading the RF circuitry with long continuous rf pulses).
times the energy for a single 180° refocusing pulse which should pose no serious problem for downhole NMR spectrometers which usually are able to create trains of hundreds of 180° refocusing pulses out of energy stored in capacitors during tW.
In some embodiments, the profiles burned with sequences that include a free evolution period are somewhat smoother than the patterns burned by continuous irradiation. This might stem from additional dephasing that occurs during the free evolution period that is missing in the second case, but is not critical. In addition, if a tool with axisymmetric field geometries is displaced by the distance Δ{right arrow over (r)}, every spin, depending on its position on the azimuth, experiences a different displacement in frequency space Δω=dω0/{right arrow over (dr)}·Δ{right arrow over (r)}. This leads to an additional effective smoothing of the actual saturation profile.
In the simulations the four pulse phases were chosen using a random generator. Therefore the performance of a sequence varied slightly from simulation to simulation. In some embodiments, a predetermined sequence of phases might be used to optimize the saturation performance. In some embodiments, an optimal parameter variation may be one without periodicity.
In summary, exemplary techniques for preconditioning spins in the neighborhood of the NMR resonance region are described above. These techniques permit polarization-based T1 measurements even if the NMR measurement apparatus (the NMR tool 60 or 35, as examples) is moving with respect to the sample, and these techniques permit polarization based measurement while drilling unstablized, at least together with a low gradient as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09,033,965, cited above. To be able to operate without a stabilizer makes the tool more “driller friendly,” and therefore greatly increases the usability of a logging while drilling (LWD) tool.
While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/205,965 filed Dec. 4, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,492,809.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4585993 | Bottomley | Apr 1986 | A |
4682106 | Vatis et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4986272 | Riederer et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5023551 | Kleinberg et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5245282 | Mugler, III et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5280243 | Miller | Jan 1994 | A |
5447155 | NessAiver | Sep 1995 | A |
5557201 | Kleinberg et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5629623 | Sezginer et al. | May 1997 | A |
5705927 | Sezginer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5914598 | Sezginer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6051973 | Prammer | Apr 2000 | A |
6163153 | Reiderman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6232778 | Speier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237404 | Crary et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246236 | Poitzsch et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246238 | Hennig | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255817 | Poitzsch et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6291995 | Speier et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297632 | Speier | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326784 | Ganesan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6366089 | Poitzsch et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373248 | Poitzsch et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392410 | Luong et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6400149 | Luong et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6492809 | Speier et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6518757 | Speier | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518758 | Speier et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6528995 | Speier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531868 | Prammer | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6531869 | Speier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538438 | Speier et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6566874 | Speier et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570381 | Speier et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
20030020473 | Speier et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9829639 | Jul 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030020473 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09205965 | Dec 1998 | US |
Child | 10197780 | US |