Precut adhesive body support articles and support system

Abstract
The invention provides an adhesive support article for supporting a body part of a user. A single-sided stretchable adhesive tape blank is precut into a sheet having a central anchoring portion and a plurality of outwardly extending fingers. The sheet is marked with visual indicators to guide the user of the support article for applying the central anchoring portion onto a first exterior surface of the body part and for stretching the fingers before adhering them at a predetermined distance away from the central anchoring portion. The adhesive support article can also be provided in a support system with at least one corresponding body landmark article, providing further guidance for applying the support article to the desired body part.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention


The invention relates to articles for supporting a user body part and more particularly to adhesive body support articles.


Background of the Invention


A relatively new tool in the physiotherapy and sports medicine arsenal is high-stretch adhesive support tape. Such tape is distinct from traditional “sports” tape which is used to isolate and restrain a body part to protect it and allow healing. It is also distinct from traditional TENSOR® wrap bandages, which although stretchable, are primarily used for bracing an injury. High-stretch adhesive support tape, by contrast, is used for the purpose of positioning the body part (typically a joint) while permitting a high degree of natural mobility.


High-stretch adhesive support tape acts as an assist to weak musculature. The stretch in the tape allows a mild degree of tension to be placed across the supported body part, in effect acting as an auxiliary muscle.


High-stretch adhesive support tape can also be used for pain therapy in acute situations. The tape lifts the skin providing a stimulus to the fascia and/or muscular tissue, stimulates blood and lymphatic flow, alters the forces over the affected joint, effects muscle inhibition and facilitation, and stimulates muscle and skin receptors such as mechanoreceptors, nociceptors, exteroceptive receptors, and cutaneous proprioceptive afferents.


The adhesive aspect of the tape is critical to producing these effects. The tape sticks directly to the body. The adhesive is strong enough that opposite ends of a length of tape applied to the body will remain adhered even when the tape length is under tension and the body part is in regular active use. This contrasts with other tapes that are either non-adhesive or adhesive only to themselves. These tapes can be wrapped repeatedly on a body part or dispensed from a self-adhesive roll but cannot be adhered directly to the body.


One particularly effective type of high-stretch adhesive support tape is Kinesio Tex™ by Kinesio Co., Ltd. of Japan. This tape has many of the advantageous properties discussed above. However, it suffers several drawbacks, relating to the fact that it is sold in rolls, which must be customized for application according to the imagination and skill of the doctor. A physiotherapist or sports doctor must cut off a section of the tape from a roll, cut the length of tape further into a therapeutic shape, and apply it to the patient. The cutting, shaping and positioning (tensioning) of the tape piece are left to the complete discretion of the doctor. It is a trial and error process. The doctor is effectively trying to estimate a position, length, shape and degree of tension that will cause a subjective improvement in sensation, range of motion or pain relief in the patient.


The tape includes no visual indication of where or how to position it on the patient's body or how to use the stretch property effectively (what tension to apply). As a result, it is possible to position the tape incorrectly or with an inappropriate tension reducing the therapeutic effectiveness, reducing or constricting blood circulation, or even worsening the underlying condition.


For the patient, this trial and error process can be frustrating. Obtaining relief and/or satisfactory support from the tape is thus heavily dependent on the skill of the particular doctor and his/her experience with the tape product. Furthermore, the patient is committed to attending regularly at the doctor's office to have the tape freshly applied, since the tape is not typically available to patients directly, and in any case, could not be applied without considerable professional guidance.


For the doctor, the tape cutting and shaping are time-consuming and may be impossible to accommodate in a busy practice. Most doctors do not see their patients on a sufficiently regular basis to keep up a continuous tape therapy. There may be long gaps between “tape application” visits for chronic conditions, during which gaps the patient has no self-treatment option.


Another drawback of existing tapes is that they are frequently only available in narrower widths (less than 3 inches). While a narrow width provides a convenient size for packaging on a roll, the size is not conducive to effective coverage for support of many body parts. The doctor applying the tape may have to cut and apply multiple pieces of tape to achieve the desired effect. This complicates the application process and increases the time commitment.


It would be desirable to provide a pre-cut, pre-engineered adhesive body support article to overcome the aforementioned problems of high-stretch adhesive support tapes.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to a first aspect of the invention, an adhesive support article is provided for supporting a body part of a user. A single-sided stretchable adhesive tape blank is precut into a sheet to form the adhesive support article. The sheet has a central anchoring portion and a plurality of fingers extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion. The sheet is marked with visual indicators to guide the user of the support article for: applying the central anchoring portion onto a first exterior surface of the body part; and stretching the fingers a predetermined distance away from the central anchoring portion according to the marked indicators and adhesively applying the fingers to a second exterior surface of the body part spaced away from the first exterior surface to support the body part by tethering the first and second exterior surfaces together.


The tape blank preferably comprises a waterproof, breathable, high-elasticity physiotherapy tape.


The central anchoring portion may define a centrally positioned hole for allowing a joint to protrude through the sheet. This aids with positioning of the support article and enhances user comfort.


The fingers may be the same length or different lengths. The fingers may comprise alternating longer and shorter lengths. The length of the fingers is used to pre-calibrate the tension that will be present in the completely installed article. Shorter fingers will be stretched more than longer fingers. Longer fingers may be adhered with no tension at all.


Preferably, the central anchoring portion comprises a generally rectangular portion having two opposing longer sides and two opposing shorter sides. The fingers may extend outward from one or both of the two longer sides. The central anchoring portion defines an axis along its length. The fingers may extend at a perpendicular or non-perpendicular angle to the axis. In one embodiment, the fingers are precut to extend helically outward from the central anchoring portion.


To aid in installation, the sheet may comprise a release liner. The release liner is preferably scored to provide separate releasable portions at the central anchoring portion and at the fingers, so as to facilitate placement of the central anchoring portion before stretching and adhering the fingers.


The indicators on the sheet may comprise numerical indicators, letter indicators, or other indicators (such as pictograms or color codes). These may be marked on the fingers, the central anchoring portion or both. Preferably, a set of coordinating indicators are used on the fingers and the central anchoring portion to facilitate installation. The indictors may be marked to guide the user of the support article for overlapping the fingers when applying them.


In one embodiment of the support article, the central anchoring portion has a U shape with a pair of side portions joined by a base portion. The fingers extend from at least one of the side portions of the U. Each finger may extend from one of the side portions be stretchable toward the other side portion. The indicators may be marked to guide the user of the support article for stretching the fingers from one side portion to the other side portion when applying them. Alternatively, the indicators may be marked to guide the user of the support article for stretching the fingers toward the base portion when applying them.


According to a second aspect of the invention, an adhesive support system is provided. The system includes an adhesive support article and at least one adhesive body landmark article. The support article is adapted for supporting a body part of a user and comprises: a single-sided stretchable adhesive tape blank precut into a sheet having a central anchoring portion and a plurality of fingers extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion.


The sheet is marked with visual indicators to guide the user of the support article for: applying the central anchoring portion onto a first exterior surface of the body part; and


stretching the fingers a predetermined distance away from the central anchoring portion according to the marked indicators and adhesively applying the fingers to a second exterior surface of the body part spaced away from the first exterior surface to support the body part by tethering the first and second exterior surfaces together.


The at least one adhesive body landmark article is adapted for adhering to an identifiable body landmark of the user to aid in gauging how far to stretch the fingers of the support article to adhere the fingers to the second exterior surface according to the marked indicators. The body landmark article may, for instance, be manufactured to a length that corresponds to the distance the fingers should be stretched from the central anchoring portion.


Preferably, the body landmark article is marked with a second set of indicators corresponding to the indicators on the support article.


Preferably, the system is packaged with instructions for the order of application of the body landmark article and the support article. It may be desirable to apply the body landmark article before the support article, or after.


The body landmark article is preferably pre-folded into halves at a central fold line. The body landmark article preferably includes a release liner, which is also scored at the central fold line to permit the pre-folded halves to be adhered separately. Preferably, at least one of the halves of the body landmark article is adapted to overlap and retain at least a portion of the fingers of the body support article when the fingers are adhered in the indicated position. The overlapping half of the body landmark article may be marked with indicators corresponding to indicators on the fingers that it overlaps.


According to a third aspect of the invention, a further adhesive support article is provided for supporting a body part of a user. The article combines a support article similar to the first embodiment with body landmarks similar to the second embodiment. The embodiment differs in that the support article and body landmarks are integral with each other in one unified support article. A single-sided stretchable adhesive tape blank precut into a sheet has: a central anchoring portion; a plurality of fingers extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion; at least one T-shaped body landmark projection extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion beyond the fingers, the body landmark having a pair of laterally extending wing members.


The sheet is marked on the fingers and the at least one body landmark with visual indicators to guide the user of the support article for:


applying the central anchoring portion onto a first exterior surface of the body part;


applying the at least one body landmark onto a second exterior surface of the body part; and


stretching the fingers away from the central anchoring portion to meet the wing members of the body landmark before adhesively applying the fingers, to thereby support the body part by tethering the first and second exterior surfaces together.


The invention has numerous advantages over the prior art. The support article and support system provide improved user-friendly adhesive support over existing tapes requiring professional cutting and shaping. The invention also provides an objectively engineered design which eliminates the guesswork of the prior tape systems, allowing tension to be pre-calibrated so that users can apply the articles themselves, providing an effective self management strategy for those suffering from painful joints and/or chronic weakness.


The pre-cut shape of the support article further allows for a physiologically more effective adhesive support for supporting a joint, as all of the extensions (fingers) of the support article are focused around an anatomically significant central point allowing the central anchoring portion and fingers to work together increasing the overall effectiveness. The single piece (or single piece with body landmarks) design provides continuous support to work in an interdependent manner providing muscular facilitation and inhibition as well as cutaneous proprioceptive input.


Physiologically, the support article is designed to pull the cutaneous attachment of the support, the projections (fingers) back toward the central anchoring portion relieving tension on the underlying superficial fascia and providing afferent sensory input altering pain reception and joint awareness. This is believed to closely replicate how the human body work by means of a continuous interfacing of fascia. Skin irritation from friction is minimized as the adhesive support and the underlying skin move as one unit.


Unlike wrap bandages and other forms of braces (both adhesive and non-adhesive), this form of support does not restrict expansion of the muscles or compression of subcutaneous blood flow and is therefore safer for application by unskilled users.


A further advantage of the support system is that the body landmarks can be used to provide additional stabilization of the fingers of the support article. In an overlapping configuration, the landmarks overlap the finger “tips” thereby preventing curling and premature delamination of the fingers when in use.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows a top plan view of a first body support article according to the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows a top plan view of a second body support article according to the present invention.



FIGS. 3 and 4 show top plan views of a body landmark article for use in the present invention (upper and lower, respectively).



FIG. 5 shows a top plan view of a first stage of installation of a body support system having a body support article and upper and lower body landmark articles.



FIG. 6 shows a side view of the upper body landmark article folded prior to installation.



FIG. 7 shows a side view of the upper body landmark article being unfolded in the course of first stage installation.



FIG. 8 shows a side view of the lower body landmark article folded prior to installation.



FIG. 9 shows a side view of the lower body landmark article being unfolded in the course of first stage installation.



FIG. 10 shows a top plan view of completed installation of the body support system.



FIG. 11 shows a top plan view of completed installation of the body support system on a human body part.



FIG. 12 shows a top plan view of a third body support article having integral upper and lower body landmarks.



FIG. 13 shows a top plan view of a variation of the first body support article, having fingers extending in one direction only.



FIG. 14 shows a top plan view of a fourth body support article having a U-shaped central anchoring portion with fingers extending toward opposite sides of the U.



FIG. 15 shows a top plan view of a variation of the fourth body support article marked with indicators for stretching the fingers in an overlapping or interwoven pattern.



FIG. 16 shows a top plan view of a further variation of the fourth body support article marked with indicators for stretching the fingers in an interlaced or interdigitated pattern.



FIG. 17 shows a top plan view of a variation of the body support system shown in FIG. 10 marked with indicators for stretching the fingers in a cross-over pattern.



FIG. 18 shows a top plan view of an adhesive support system for supporting a body part.



FIG. 19 shows a bottom view of the adhesive support system of FIG. 18.



FIG. 20 shows a simplified side view of the adhesive support system of FIG. 18.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 illustrates a very simplistic adhesive body support article 10 according to the present invention. For the greatest simplicity, a single fixed shape may be used which is capable of providing support to the knee, low back, hip, shoulder, hamstring, and elbow in one design. The pre-cut sheet has a central anchoring portion (generally, 20), which may include a central hole 40 for allowing a joint to protrude. Projecting generally outwardly from the central anchoring portion 20 are fingers 30. As shown, the support article 10 may have separate upper and lower fingers terminating at upper ends 50A and lower ends 50B respectively. An alternative configuration of the body support article is shown in FIG. 13. As illustrated, the article may be configured so that all fingers 30 extend in one direction away from the central anchoring portion 20.


The support article is an adhesive sheet having a skin-safe high tack adhesive on one side. The sheet has a high-stretch fabric base, which is preferably breathable. A stretch coefficient of approximately 140% is considered optimal, however a range of stretchability may be useful. Acceptable adhesives and base fabrics are considered to be within the knowledge of persons skilled in the art of bandage and body tape manufacturing and are not discussed here in detail.


Of note, the support article of the present invention is pre-cut and marked with indicators allowing positioning of the article on a body part of a user. Ideally, the article will also be packaged with simple instructions (not shown) for the user to apply the article. For instance, the instructions may indicate that, after adhering the central anchoring portion 20, the user should measure up from the central anchoring portion 5 inches and adhere the “A” marked 60A finger tips 50A at that location. The user should measure down from the central anchoring portion 4 inches and adhere the “B” marked 60B finger tips 50B at that location. These measurements are merely for illustration and must be selected to be appropriate to the particular application desired (i.e. particular body part to be supported) and may further be dependent on the size of the user. The distances to stretch govern the tension on the fingers, which support the body part. As shown in FIG. 13, the fingers may have individual markings 60, each corresponding to a different placement direction and desired end point, which would be detailed in the accompanying instructions (not shown). Note that in both the variations the central anchoring portion 20 is adhered without stretching, therefore it has no tension.


A body support system is illustrated in FIGS. 2-11 and 17. The main components of the system are the support article 110 and body landmark articles 150A, 150B. The body landmark articles 150A, 150B avoid the need to perform a measurement in order to adhere the support article. They assist in positioning the support article.


As with the basic body support described above, the body support article 110 shown in FIG. 2 has a central anchoring portion 120 (also shown in FIG. 2 as having cutaway 140 for joint protrusion), and fingers 130 extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion 120. The fingers 130 are marked with indicators (shown as being separate upper and lower indicators 170A and 170B, respectively). The indicators correspond to indicators 170A and 170B on landmark articles 150A and 150B shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. The body support article 110 has a release liner, which is preferably scored along line 125 at the upper and lower boundaries of the central anchoring portion 120. The score lines 125 allow the release liner to be separated to expose the central anchoring portion 120 separately from the release liner(s) along fingers 130, so that the portions may be adhered in sequence.


A preferred body landmark article design is shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. These correspond generally to a preferred design of upper and lower landmarks 150A, 150B (respectively). Each landmark article is preferably provided with a central fold line 180A, 180B (also scored on the release liner), which separates the landmark article into two halves (182, 184 on the upper landmark article and 186, 188 on the lower landmark article).


The installation process of the body support system is illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 10. FIG. 5 illustrates the first phase of installation, while FIG. 10 illustrates the completed installation. To install the body support system, the release liner portion on the back of the central anchoring portion 120 is first removed along score lines 125. The central anchoring portion with adhesive exposed is then adhered (with zero tension, zero stretch) to the physiological centre that is desired to be supported. Cutaway 140 is used to center the anchor over an affected joint or other significant body feature (e.g. spine). At this point, the fingers 130 are at zero tension and are covered by the release liner. The pre-folded upper and lower body landmark articles 150A and 150B are then adhered at fold halves 182, 188 only. The length 160A, 160B of each of the upper and lower body landmark articles preferably corresponds to the distance away from the central anchoring portion that is needed for effective stretch support by the fingers. Therefore, before adhering the landmark articles, these may be used as rulers by positioning them extending outwardly lengthwise from the fold line 125, the end giving a visual guideline for where the landmark fold line 180A, 180B should then be positioned when the landmark article is situated in its installation position (shown in FIG. 5).


Once the halves 182, 188 are adhered so that the landmark articles are in their installation position, the release liners on the fingers 130 are removed and the fingers 130 are stretched so that they extend to the lines 180A, 180B. The upper fingers are stretched in accordance with their marked indicators to the marked positions on the landmark articles 150A, 1508 (best shown in FIG. 10). The different lengths of the fingers 130 are pre-engineered so that different tensions will result when the fingers are stretched to lines 180A, 180B. Preferably, the tensions will range between about 10% to about 40% to support the affected area. Once the fingers 130 have been stretched and adhered in position, the landmark articles are unfolded. The release liner portions on the unadhered halves of the landmark articles are removed, exposing their adhesive layers. As shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, the folded half 184 is brought down to lie flat adjacent half 182 in the upper landmark article 150A. The folded half 186 is brought down to lie flat adjacent half 188 in the lower landmark article 150B. Thus, as shown in FIG. 10, the fingers 130 in completely stretched position are overlapped by the landmark articles 150A, 150B at 190A, 190B. This also serves to secure the ends of the fingers against peeling.



FIG. 17 shows an alternative variation of the embodiment shown in FIG. 10. In this variation, the fingers 130 and body landmark articles 150A, 150B are marked for application of the fingers in a cross-over pattern. The cross-over provides a higher concentration of positioning force focused toward the center of the body part supported.



FIG. 11 illustrates a sample placement of the body support system 110 on a human knee. As an illustration of the physiological effect of the support system, the use will be described having reference to the knee. It will be appreciated that the support article and support system are equally capable of supporting another body part, either in the shape illustrated or in a similar shape having similar general features of a central anchoring portion and extensible fingers.


Patellofemoral pain syndrome is one of the most frequently experienced reasons for knee pain. Factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome are inactivation of the vastus medialus muscle, over-recruitment of the vastus lateralis, weakness of the rectus femoris and tibialis anterior. The patella ends up having excessive force pulling it laterally altering the normal wear and friction leading to pain and inflammation. Muscle weakness may attribute to arthrogenous inhibition, muscle fibre atrophy or mypopathic change.


The support system provides adhesive support bracing objectively engineered, in the case of the knee, to control the position of the patella, altering the magnitude or distribution of patellofemoral joint pressures or stress on joint and soft tissue structures thus providing pain relief. The support system helps correct and realign movement of the patella to take pressure off inflamed tissue and alter “somatic” sensations thus increasing cutaneous proprioceptive acuity, quadriceps strength and neuromotor control.


A further effect is to provide facilitation to the regional muscles of the knee to influence the forces experienced by the knee (vastus medialis, rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, tibialis anterior). The support system further provides exteroceptive stimulation thus altering pain sensation and provides cutaneous proprioceptive input thus affecting muscle control.


These effects are achieved because of the differential tensions on the adhesive fingers pulled from the origin at the central anchoring portion. The pre-cut support article includes a central anatomically significant fixed point of origin and physiologically important projections to facilitate and inhibit muscles acting of the knee, governed by different levels of tension, in order to alter the forces over the knee in such a way as to reduce pain and improve range of motion.


A variant design is shown in FIG. 12. As illustrated, the body support article 210 may be provided as an integral piece with the landmark portions 165A, 165B. The article 210 has a central anchoring portion 220 with cutaway 240 and scored release liner lines 225. Fingers 230 project away from the central anchoring portion 220 and include marked indicators 270A, 270B. Also extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion is a pair of T-shaped landmark portions, each having trunk portion 235 and T portion 165A, 165B having laterally extending wings. The landmark portions are marked with indicators 270A, 270B corresponding to indicators on the fingers. Following installation and adhesion of the central anchoring portion 220, the landmark portions with their respective trunk portions are adhered (having zero tension) at their pre-measured distance away from the central anchoring portion. The fingers 230 are then stretched to match the indicators 270A, 270B together (respectively) to provide the pre-determined level of tension to support the body part.



FIGS. 14-16 illustrate an alternative embodiment of a body support article 310 having a U-shaped central anchoring portion 320. Different marking configurations are possible, as shown in FIGS. 14-16. In FIG. 14, the fingers 330 (which extend from side portions 320A, 320B) are marked for application in a grid pattern. In FIG. 15, the fingers 330 are marked for application by stretching them to coordinating positions on the U-shaped central anchoring portion 320. The U-shaped central anchoring portion may thus take the place of the body landmark articles in the body support system embodiment described above. In FIG. 16, the fingers 330 are marked for application in an interlaced or interdigitated pattern (each finger being stretchable to extend to a corresponding indicator on the opposite side portion 320A, 320B).


Referring to FIGS. 18-20, in the example illustrated, another body support article 410 includes a pre-cut stretchable sheet 415 having an adhesive surface 417. The pre-cut stretchable sheet includes a central anchoring portion 420. The central anchoring portion 420 includes a positioning aid for guiding the user to apply the central anchoring portion 420 to a physiological center to be supported. In the example illustrated, the positioning aid includes a central hole 440 in the central anchoring portion 420.


In the example illustrated, the sheet further includes a first plurality of fingers 430A projecting outwardly from the central anchoring portion 420 in a first direction, and a second plurality of fingers 430B projecting outwardly from the central anchoring portion 420 in a second direction opposite to the first direction. The article 410 further includes a release liner 419 on the adhesive surface 417. The release liner 419 is scored along a first boundary 425A between the central anchoring portion 420 and the first plurality of fingers 430A, and scored along a second boundary 425B between the central anchoring portion 420 and the second plurality of fingers 430B. The article 410 further includes a set of indicators 470 indicating that the central anchoring portion 420 is to be applied prior to the first plurality of fingers 430A and the second plurality of fingers 430B. In the example illustrated, the set of indicators 470 is printed on the release liner 419.


The foregoing description illustrates only certain preferred embodiments of the invention. The invention is not limited to the foregoing examples. That is, persons skilled in the art will appreciate and understand that modifications and variations are, or will be, possible to utilize and carry out the teachings of the invention described herein. Accordingly, all suitable modifications, variations and equivalents may be resorted to, and such modifications, variations and equivalents are intended to fall within the scope of the invention as described and within the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. An adhesive support system for supporting a body part of a user, comprising: a) a pre-cut stretchable sheet having an adhesive surface, the pre-cut stretchable sheet comprising (i) a U-shaped central anchoring portion having a base portion and a pair of spaced apart side portions extending from the base portion in a common direction, (ii) a plurality of fingers projecting from at least one of the side portions;b) a release liner on the adhesive surface, the release liner scored along a boundary between the central anchoring portion and the plurality of fingers; andc) a set of indicators, the set of indicators indicating that the central anchoring portion is to be applied prior to the plurality of fingers.
  • 2. The adhesive support system of claim 1, wherein the set of indicators is printed on the release liner.
  • 3. The adhesive support system of claim 1, wherein the sheet is waterproof, breathable, and has high-elasticity.
  • 4. A method for applying an adhesive support article to a body part of a user, the method comprising: a) identifying on the body part a physiological center to be supported;b) removing a first release liner portion from an anchor portion of a pre-cut stretchable sheet;c) adhesively applying the anchor portion to the physiological center to be supported;d) removing a second release liner portion from a plurality of fingers of the pre-cut stretchable sheet; ande) positioning the plurality of fingers to extend away from the physiological center to be supported without wrapping the plurality of fingers completely around the body part, and adhesively applying the plurality of fingers to the body part,wherein step c) comprises using a positioning aid to center the anchor portion on the physiological center to be supported.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the physiological center is a joint, the anchor portion comprises a central hole, and step c) comprises applying the anchor portion such that the joint protrudes through the central hole.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the body part is a knee, and the physiological center is a patella.
  • 7. The method of claim 4, wherein the body part is one of a knee, a low back, a hip, a shoulder, a hamstring, and an elbow.
  • 8. The method of claim 4, further comprising: a) removing a third release liner portion from an addition plurality of fingers of the pre-cut stretchable sheet; andb) positioning the additional plurality of fingers to extend away from the physiological center to be supported without wrapping the additional plurality fingers completely around the body part, and adhesively applying the additional plurality of fingers to the body part.
  • 9. The method of claim 4, wherein step e) comprises positioning the fingers in a cross-over pattern.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2578927 Feb 2007 CA national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/526,829, filed Sep. 25, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,742,196, issued on Jun. 3, 2014), which is a national stage application of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/000233, filed Feb. 7, 2008, which claims benefit of Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,578,927, filed Feb. 19, 2007. Each of the aforementioned patent applications is herein incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (107)
Number Name Date Kind
2310082 Holbrooke Feb 1943 A
2321363 Crowley Jun 1943 A
2349709 Evans May 1944 A
2399545 Davis Apr 1946 A
2415276 Buckley et al. Feb 1947 A
2508855 Brown May 1950 A
2592801 Hanington Apr 1952 A
2646040 Stanton Jul 1953 A
2740403 Schueler Apr 1956 A
2798492 Barnes et al. Jul 1957 A
2861006 Salditt Nov 1958 A
2940868 Patchell Jun 1960 A
3199548 Conant Aug 1965 A
3523859 Komp Aug 1970 A
3529597 Pfaffenberger Sep 1970 A
3618754 Hoey Nov 1971 A
3677250 Thomas Jul 1972 A
3811438 Economou May 1974 A
3853598 Raguse Dec 1974 A
3971374 Wagner Jul 1976 A
3989041 Davies Nov 1976 A
4141363 James et al. Feb 1979 A
4207885 Hampton et al. Jun 1980 A
4236550 Braun et al. Dec 1980 A
4345590 Nakajima Aug 1982 A
4424808 Schafer et al. Jan 1984 A
4485809 Dellas Dec 1984 A
4665909 Trainor May 1987 A
4699133 Schafer et al. Oct 1987 A
4702948 Sieber-Gadient Oct 1987 A
4734320 Ohira Mar 1988 A
4737400 Edison et al. Apr 1988 A
4769028 Hoffmann et al. Sep 1988 A
4891040 Nagai et al. Jan 1990 A
4950282 Beisang et al. Aug 1990 A
4999235 Lunn et al. Mar 1991 A
5047285 Ward Sep 1991 A
5139476 Peters Aug 1992 A
D330255 Nelson, Jr. Oct 1992 S
5228458 Ciacca Jul 1993 A
5279891 Ward Jan 1994 A
5336162 Ota et al. Aug 1994 A
5336219 Krantz Aug 1994 A
5419913 Podell et al. May 1995 A
5480708 Cheng Jan 1996 A
5711312 Staudinger Jan 1998 A
5749843 Miller May 1998 A
5792091 Staudinger Aug 1998 A
5795834 Deeb et al. Aug 1998 A
5827213 Jensen Oct 1998 A
5853750 Dietz et al. Dec 1998 A
5861348 Kase Jan 1999 A
6010002 Petterson Jan 2000 A
6018092 Dunshee Jan 2000 A
6048806 Deeb et al. Apr 2000 A
D430295 Ierulli Aug 2000 S
D444562 Kozub Jul 2001 S
6277458 Dirksing et al. Aug 2001 B1
6447470 Bodenschatz Sep 2002 B2
6455752 Vesey Sep 2002 B1
6512158 Dobos Jan 2003 B1
6559350 Tetreault et al. May 2003 B1
6849057 Satou et al. Feb 2005 B2
7066182 Dunshee Jun 2006 B1
7419476 Oohira et al. Sep 2008 B2
D609922 Bridges et al. Feb 2010 S
7902420 Kase Mar 2011 B2
7947366 Ishiwatari et al. May 2011 B2
D640379 Hope Jun 2011 S
D670395 Wakamatsu et al. Nov 2012 S
D679405 Arbesman Apr 2013 S
8491514 Creighton et al. Jul 2013 B2
D691276 Bushby Oct 2013 S
8814818 Bushby Aug 2014 B2
D737986 Arbesman Sep 2015 S
D743566 Arbesman Nov 2015 S
9189978 Tataryan et al. Nov 2015 B2
9205002 Kase et al. Dec 2015 B2
D765869 Camper Sep 2016 S
20030102239 Beard Jun 2003 A1
20030204159 Lawry Oct 2003 A1
20040168945 Houze Sep 2004 A1
20050182443 Jonn et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050228323 Tornai Oct 2005 A1
20060089583 Reinhardt Apr 2006 A1
20060089585 Takemura et al. Apr 2006 A1
20080154169 Kase Jun 2008 A1
20090182256 Lin Jul 2009 A1
20100094191 Netsner et al. Apr 2010 A1
20110015556 Fabo et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110288611 Lunau et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120071808 Sato et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120221044 Archibald et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120226214 Gurtner et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120232448 Wüst Sep 2012 A1
20130012988 Blume et al. Jan 2013 A1
20140079900 Ramirez Mar 2014 A1
20140276319 Ibrahim et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150217098 Hicken et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150328054 Capobianco et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160051393 Hahn et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160106595 Arbesman et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160128950 Mitroo May 2016 A1
20160262943 Arbesman et al. Sep 2016 A1
20170049629 Arbesman et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170056252 Arbesman Mar 2017 A1
20170057197 Arbesman Mar 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (37)
Number Date Country
D161901 Nov 2015 CA
102178580 Sep 2011 CN
36 40 979 Aug 1987 DE
197 02 300 Jul 1998 DE
0051935 May 1982 EP
0 741 998 Nov 1996 EP
1 260 565 Nov 2002 EP
1 716 829 Nov 2006 EP
54-49197 Apr 1979 JP
S58155879 Sep 1983 JP
61-39135 Feb 1986 JP
61-257644 Nov 1986 JP
63-135621 Jun 1988 JP
64-061534 Mar 1989 JP
187717 Jun 1989 JP
64-040421 Oct 1989 JP
2135017 Nov 1990 JP
4-18512 Jan 1992 JP
D832131 Mar 1992 JP
D832133 Mar 1992 JP
04092220 Aug 1992 JP
7-43330 Aug 1995 JP
08-112304 May 1996 JP
2000-245771 Sep 2000 JP
2001-000463 Jan 2001 JP
2001-104366 Apr 2001 JP
2002233545 Aug 2002 JP
3097985 Sep 2003 JP
2004236795 Aug 2004 JP
2004248842 Sep 2004 JP
D1217902 Sep 2004 JP
D1218142 Sep 2004 JP
D1218143 Sep 2004 JP
4-110723 Jul 2008 JP
3019850003413 Mar 1985 KR
300420095 Jul 2006 KR
D1218144 Jul 2006 KR
Non-Patent Literature Citations (26)
Entry
Michael B. Miller, Iatrogenic and Nurisgenic Effects of Prolonged Immobilization of the III Aged, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Jul. 1975, vol. XXIII, No. 7, pp. 360-369.
O'Leary, M. Carroll, R. Mellor, A. Scott, and B. Vicenzino, The Effect of Soft Tissue Deloading Tape on Thoracic Spine Pressure Pain Thresholds in Asymptomatic Subjects, Manual Therapy, 2002, pp. 150-153, vol. 7 (3).
Steven B. Purcell, Brynn E. Schuckman, Carrie L. Docherty, John Schrader, and Wendy Poppy, Differences in Ankle Range of Motion Before and After Exercise in 2 Tape Conditions, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009, pp. 383-389, vol. 37, No. 2.
David M. Selkowitz, Casey Chaney, Sandra J. Stuckey, and Georgeanne Vlad, The Effects of Scapular Taping on the Surface Electromyographia Signal Amplitude of Shoulder Girdle Muscles During Upper Extremity Elevation in Individuals With Suspected Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Journal of Orthopaedic Sports Physical Therapy, Nov. 2007, vol. 37, No. 11.
Anna Slupik, Michael Dwornik, Dariusz Bialoszewski, and Emilia Zych, Effect of Kinesio Taping on Bioelectrical Activity of Vastus Medialis Muscle Preliminary Report, Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, Medsportpress, Nov.-Dec. 2007, pp. 644-651, vol. 9.
Mark D. Thelen, James A Dauber, and Paul D. Stoneman, The Clinical Efficacy of Kinesio Tape for Shoulder Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Clinical Trial, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, Jul. 2008, pp. 389-395, vol. 38, No. 7.
Han-Ju Tsai, Hsiu-Chuan Hung, Jing-Lan Yang, Chiun-Sheng Huang, and Jau-Yih Tsauo, Could Kinesio Tape Replace the Bandage in Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy for Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema? A Pilot Study, Support Care Cancer, 2009, pp. 1353-1360.
Audrey Yasukawa, Payal Patel, and Charles Sisung, Pilot Study: Investigating the Effects of Kinesio Taping in an Acute Pediatric Rehabilitation Setting, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Jan./Feb. 2006, pp. 104-110, vol. 60, No. 1.
Ayako Yoshida and Leamor Kahanov, The Effect of Kinesio Taping on Lower Trunk Range of Motions, Research in Sports Medicine, 2007, pp. 103-112, vol. 15.
Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2,578,927 dated Jan. 19, 2011.
Kinesio Tex Website, dated May 8, 2008, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.kinesio-tape.com/KinesioTex1.html>, published 2007.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/CA2008/000233, dated May 14, 2008.
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/902,313.
Akuta Co., Ltd., “Maestro Kojy's Words of Encouragement—Go Into Business!”, New-Hale, Sep. 2006.
Naoko Aminaka and Phillip A. Gribble, Patellar Taping, Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, Lower Extremity Kinematics and Dynamic Postural Control, Journal of Athletic Training, 2008, pp. 21-28, vol. 43(1).
Dariusz Bialoszewski, Weronika Wozniak, and Slawomir Zarek, Clinical Efficacy of Kinesiology Taping in Reducing Edema of the Lower Limbs in Patients Treated With the Ilizarov Method—Preliminary Report, Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2009, pp. 46-54, vol. 11.
A. M. Cools, E. E. Witvrouw, L. A. Danneels, and D. C. Cambier, Does Taping Influence Electromyographic Muscle Activity in the Scapular Rotators in Healthy Shoulders, Manual Therapy, 2002, pp. 154-162, vol. 7(3).
Tieh-Cheng Fu, Alice M. K. Wong, Yu-Cheng Pei, Katie P. Wu, Shih-Wei Chou, and Yin-Chou Lin, Effect of Kinesio Taping on Muscle Strength in Athletes—A Pilot Study, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2008, pp. 198-201, vol. 11.
J.M. Greve, J. D. Rossi, W. Cossermelli, and Filho Ferreira, Functional Rehabilitation of Degenerative Tendinous Injuries of the Shoulder, Rev. Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo, Mar.-Apr. 1991, vol. 46(2).
Yin-Hsin Hsu, Wen-Yin Chen, Hsiu-Chen Lin, Wendy T. J. Wang, and Yi-Fen Shih, The Effects of Taping on Scapular Kinematics and Muscle Performance in Baseball Players with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 19, 2009, pp. 1092-1099.
Ewa Jaraczewska and Carol Long, Kinesio Taping in Stroke: Improving Functional Use of the Upper Extremity in Hemiplegia, Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Summer 2006, pp. 31-42.
Kenzo Kase, Illustrated Kinesio Taping, Fourth Edition, Ken'l Kai Information, 2005.
Kenzo Kase, Jim Wallis, and Tsuyoshi Kase, Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method, 2nd Edition, Tokyo: Kenzo Kase, 2003.
Kenzo Kase, Tasuyaki Hashimoto, and Tomoki Okane, Kinesio Taping Perfect Manual, 1996, Japan, Kinesio Taping Association.
Yuh-Hwan Liu, Shu-Min Chen, Chi-Yi Lin, Chung-I Huang, and Yung-Nien Sun, Motion Tracking on Elbow Tissue from Ultrasonic Image Sequence for Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis, Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Lyon, France, Aug. 23-26, 2007, pp. 95-98.
European Search Report dated Nov. 7, 2014, EPO Application No. 08 714 556.1.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140213956 A1 Jul 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12526829 US
Child 14242503 US