Field of the Invention
The invention relates to articles for supporting a user body part and more particularly to adhesive body support articles.
Background of the Invention
A relatively new tool in the physiotherapy and sports medicine arsenal is high-stretch adhesive support tape. Such tape is distinct from traditional “sports” tape which is used to isolate and restrain a body part to protect it and allow healing. It is also distinct from traditional TENSOR® wrap bandages, which although stretchable, are primarily used for bracing an injury. High-stretch adhesive support tape, by contrast, is used for the purpose of positioning the body part (typically a joint) while permitting a high degree of natural mobility.
High-stretch adhesive support tape acts as an assist to weak musculature. The stretch in the tape allows a mild degree of tension to be placed across the supported body part, in effect acting as an auxiliary muscle.
High-stretch adhesive support tape can also be used for pain therapy in acute situations. The tape lifts the skin providing a stimulus to the fascia and/or muscular tissue, stimulates blood and lymphatic flow, alters the forces over the affected joint, effects muscle inhibition and facilitation, and stimulates muscle and skin receptors such as mechanoreceptors, nociceptors, exteroceptive receptors, and cutaneous proprioceptive afferents.
The adhesive aspect of the tape is critical to producing these effects. The tape sticks directly to the body. The adhesive is strong enough that opposite ends of a length of tape applied to the body will remain adhered even when the tape length is under tension and the body part is in regular active use. This contrasts with other tapes that are either non-adhesive or adhesive only to themselves. These tapes can be wrapped repeatedly on a body part or dispensed from a self-adhesive roll but cannot be adhered directly to the body.
One particularly effective type of high-stretch adhesive support tape is Kinesio Tex™ by Kinesio Co., Ltd. of Japan. This tape has many of the advantageous properties discussed above. However, it suffers several drawbacks, relating to the fact that it is sold in rolls, which must be customized for application according to the imagination and skill of the doctor. A physiotherapist or sports doctor must cut off a section of the tape from a roll, cut the length of tape further into a therapeutic shape, and apply it to the patient. The cutting, shaping and positioning (tensioning) of the tape piece are left to the complete discretion of the doctor. It is a trial and error process. The doctor is effectively trying to estimate a position, length, shape and degree of tension that will cause a subjective improvement in sensation, range of motion or pain relief in the patient.
The tape includes no visual indication of where or how to position it on the patient's body or how to use the stretch property effectively (what tension to apply). As a result, it is possible to position the tape incorrectly or with an inappropriate tension reducing the therapeutic effectiveness, reducing or constricting blood circulation, or even worsening the underlying condition.
For the patient, this trial and error process can be frustrating. Obtaining relief and/or satisfactory support from the tape is thus heavily dependent on the skill of the particular doctor and his/her experience with the tape product. Furthermore, the patient is committed to attending regularly at the doctor's office to have the tape freshly applied, since the tape is not typically available to patients directly, and in any case, could not be applied without considerable professional guidance.
For the doctor, the tape cutting and shaping are time-consuming and may be impossible to accommodate in a busy practice. Most doctors do not see their patients on a sufficiently regular basis to keep up a continuous tape therapy. There may be long gaps between “tape application” visits for chronic conditions, during which gaps the patient has no self-treatment option.
Another drawback of existing tapes is that they are frequently only available in narrower widths (less than 3 inches). While a narrow width provides a convenient size for packaging on a roll, the size is not conducive to effective coverage for support of many body parts. The doctor applying the tape may have to cut and apply multiple pieces of tape to achieve the desired effect. This complicates the application process and increases the time commitment.
It would be desirable to provide a pre-cut, pre-engineered adhesive body support article to overcome the aforementioned problems of high-stretch adhesive support tapes.
According to a first aspect of the invention, an adhesive support article is provided for supporting a body part of a user. A single-sided stretchable adhesive tape blank is precut into a sheet to form the adhesive support article. The sheet has a central anchoring portion and a plurality of fingers extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion. The sheet is marked with visual indicators to guide the user of the support article for: applying the central anchoring portion onto a first exterior surface of the body part; and stretching the fingers a predetermined distance away from the central anchoring portion according to the marked indicators and adhesively applying the fingers to a second exterior surface of the body part spaced away from the first exterior surface to support the body part by tethering the first and second exterior surfaces together.
The tape blank preferably comprises a waterproof, breathable, high-elasticity physiotherapy tape.
The central anchoring portion may define a centrally positioned hole for allowing a joint to protrude through the sheet. This aids with positioning of the support article and enhances user comfort.
The fingers may be the same length or different lengths. The fingers may comprise alternating longer and shorter lengths. The length of the fingers is used to pre-calibrate the tension that will be present in the completely installed article. Shorter fingers will be stretched more than longer fingers. Longer fingers may be adhered with no tension at all.
Preferably, the central anchoring portion comprises a generally rectangular portion having two opposing longer sides and two opposing shorter sides. The fingers may extend outward from one or both of the two longer sides. The central anchoring portion defines an axis along its length. The fingers may extend at a perpendicular or non-perpendicular angle to the axis. In one embodiment, the fingers are precut to extend helically outward from the central anchoring portion.
To aid in installation, the sheet may comprise a release liner. The release liner is preferably scored to provide separate releasable portions at the central anchoring portion and at the fingers, so as to facilitate placement of the central anchoring portion before stretching and adhering the fingers.
The indicators on the sheet may comprise numerical indicators, letter indicators, or other indicators (such as pictograms or color codes). These may be marked on the fingers, the central anchoring portion or both. Preferably, a set of coordinating indicators are used on the fingers and the central anchoring portion to facilitate installation. The indictors may be marked to guide the user of the support article for overlapping the fingers when applying them.
In one embodiment of the support article, the central anchoring portion has a U shape with a pair of side portions joined by a base portion. The fingers extend from at least one of the side portions of the U. Each finger may extend from one of the side portions be stretchable toward the other side portion. The indicators may be marked to guide the user of the support article for stretching the fingers from one side portion to the other side portion when applying them. Alternatively, the indicators may be marked to guide the user of the support article for stretching the fingers toward the base portion when applying them.
According to a second aspect of the invention, an adhesive support system is provided. The system includes an adhesive support article and at least one adhesive body landmark article. The support article is adapted for supporting a body part of a user and comprises: a single-sided stretchable adhesive tape blank precut into a sheet having a central anchoring portion and a plurality of fingers extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion.
The sheet is marked with visual indicators to guide the user of the support article for: applying the central anchoring portion onto a first exterior surface of the body part; and
stretching the fingers a predetermined distance away from the central anchoring portion according to the marked indicators and adhesively applying the fingers to a second exterior surface of the body part spaced away from the first exterior surface to support the body part by tethering the first and second exterior surfaces together.
The at least one adhesive body landmark article is adapted for adhering to an identifiable body landmark of the user to aid in gauging how far to stretch the fingers of the support article to adhere the fingers to the second exterior surface according to the marked indicators. The body landmark article may, for instance, be manufactured to a length that corresponds to the distance the fingers should be stretched from the central anchoring portion.
Preferably, the body landmark article is marked with a second set of indicators corresponding to the indicators on the support article.
Preferably, the system is packaged with instructions for the order of application of the body landmark article and the support article. It may be desirable to apply the body landmark article before the support article, or after.
The body landmark article is preferably pre-folded into halves at a central fold line. The body landmark article preferably includes a release liner, which is also scored at the central fold line to permit the pre-folded halves to be adhered separately. Preferably, at least one of the halves of the body landmark article is adapted to overlap and retain at least a portion of the fingers of the body support article when the fingers are adhered in the indicated position. The overlapping half of the body landmark article may be marked with indicators corresponding to indicators on the fingers that it overlaps.
According to a third aspect of the invention, a further adhesive support article is provided for supporting a body part of a user. The article combines a support article similar to the first embodiment with body landmarks similar to the second embodiment. The embodiment differs in that the support article and body landmarks are integral with each other in one unified support article. A single-sided stretchable adhesive tape blank precut into a sheet has: a central anchoring portion; a plurality of fingers extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion; at least one T-shaped body landmark projection extending outwardly from the central anchoring portion beyond the fingers, the body landmark having a pair of laterally extending wing members.
The sheet is marked on the fingers and the at least one body landmark with visual indicators to guide the user of the support article for:
applying the central anchoring portion onto a first exterior surface of the body part;
applying the at least one body landmark onto a second exterior surface of the body part; and
stretching the fingers away from the central anchoring portion to meet the wing members of the body landmark before adhesively applying the fingers, to thereby support the body part by tethering the first and second exterior surfaces together.
The invention has numerous advantages over the prior art. The support article and support system provide improved user-friendly adhesive support over existing tapes requiring professional cutting and shaping. The invention also provides an objectively engineered design which eliminates the guesswork of the prior tape systems, allowing tension to be pre-calibrated so that users can apply the articles themselves, providing an effective self management strategy for those suffering from painful joints and/or chronic weakness.
The pre-cut shape of the support article further allows for a physiologically more effective adhesive support for supporting a joint, as all of the extensions (fingers) of the support article are focused around an anatomically significant central point allowing the central anchoring portion and fingers to work together increasing the overall effectiveness. The single piece (or single piece with body landmarks) design provides continuous support to work in an interdependent manner providing muscular facilitation and inhibition as well as cutaneous proprioceptive input.
Physiologically, the support article is designed to pull the cutaneous attachment of the support, the projections (fingers) back toward the central anchoring portion relieving tension on the underlying superficial fascia and providing afferent sensory input altering pain reception and joint awareness. This is believed to closely replicate how the human body work by means of a continuous interfacing of fascia. Skin irritation from friction is minimized as the adhesive support and the underlying skin move as one unit.
Unlike wrap bandages and other forms of braces (both adhesive and non-adhesive), this form of support does not restrict expansion of the muscles or compression of subcutaneous blood flow and is therefore safer for application by unskilled users.
A further advantage of the support system is that the body landmarks can be used to provide additional stabilization of the fingers of the support article. In an overlapping configuration, the landmarks overlap the finger “tips” thereby preventing curling and premature delamination of the fingers when in use.
The support article is an adhesive sheet having a skin-safe high tack adhesive on one side. The sheet has a high-stretch fabric base, which is preferably breathable. A stretch coefficient of approximately 140% is considered optimal, however a range of stretchability may be useful. Acceptable adhesives and base fabrics are considered to be within the knowledge of persons skilled in the art of bandage and body tape manufacturing and are not discussed here in detail.
Of note, the support article of the present invention is pre-cut and marked with indicators allowing positioning of the article on a body part of a user. Ideally, the article will also be packaged with simple instructions (not shown) for the user to apply the article. For instance, the instructions may indicate that, after adhering the central anchoring portion 20, the user should measure up from the central anchoring portion 5 inches and adhere the “A” marked 60A finger tips 50A at that location. The user should measure down from the central anchoring portion 4 inches and adhere the “B” marked 60B finger tips 50B at that location. These measurements are merely for illustration and must be selected to be appropriate to the particular application desired (i.e. particular body part to be supported) and may further be dependent on the size of the user. The distances to stretch govern the tension on the fingers, which support the body part. As shown in
A body support system is illustrated in
As with the basic body support described above, the body support article 110 shown in
A preferred body landmark article design is shown in
The installation process of the body support system is illustrated in
Once the halves 182, 188 are adhered so that the landmark articles are in their installation position, the release liners on the fingers 130 are removed and the fingers 130 are stretched so that they extend to the lines 180A, 180B. The upper fingers are stretched in accordance with their marked indicators to the marked positions on the landmark articles 150A, 1508 (best shown in
Patellofemoral pain syndrome is one of the most frequently experienced reasons for knee pain. Factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome are inactivation of the vastus medialus muscle, over-recruitment of the vastus lateralis, weakness of the rectus femoris and tibialis anterior. The patella ends up having excessive force pulling it laterally altering the normal wear and friction leading to pain and inflammation. Muscle weakness may attribute to arthrogenous inhibition, muscle fibre atrophy or mypopathic change.
The support system provides adhesive support bracing objectively engineered, in the case of the knee, to control the position of the patella, altering the magnitude or distribution of patellofemoral joint pressures or stress on joint and soft tissue structures thus providing pain relief. The support system helps correct and realign movement of the patella to take pressure off inflamed tissue and alter “somatic” sensations thus increasing cutaneous proprioceptive acuity, quadriceps strength and neuromotor control.
A further effect is to provide facilitation to the regional muscles of the knee to influence the forces experienced by the knee (vastus medialis, rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, tibialis anterior). The support system further provides exteroceptive stimulation thus altering pain sensation and provides cutaneous proprioceptive input thus affecting muscle control.
These effects are achieved because of the differential tensions on the adhesive fingers pulled from the origin at the central anchoring portion. The pre-cut support article includes a central anatomically significant fixed point of origin and physiologically important projections to facilitate and inhibit muscles acting of the knee, governed by different levels of tension, in order to alter the forces over the knee in such a way as to reduce pain and improve range of motion.
A variant design is shown in
Referring to
In the example illustrated, the sheet further includes a first plurality of fingers 430A projecting outwardly from the central anchoring portion 420 in a first direction, and a second plurality of fingers 430B projecting outwardly from the central anchoring portion 420 in a second direction opposite to the first direction. The article 410 further includes a release liner 419 on the adhesive surface 417. The release liner 419 is scored along a first boundary 425A between the central anchoring portion 420 and the first plurality of fingers 430A, and scored along a second boundary 425B between the central anchoring portion 420 and the second plurality of fingers 430B. The article 410 further includes a set of indicators 470 indicating that the central anchoring portion 420 is to be applied prior to the first plurality of fingers 430A and the second plurality of fingers 430B. In the example illustrated, the set of indicators 470 is printed on the release liner 419.
The foregoing description illustrates only certain preferred embodiments of the invention. The invention is not limited to the foregoing examples. That is, persons skilled in the art will appreciate and understand that modifications and variations are, or will be, possible to utilize and carry out the teachings of the invention described herein. Accordingly, all suitable modifications, variations and equivalents may be resorted to, and such modifications, variations and equivalents are intended to fall within the scope of the invention as described and within the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2578927 | Feb 2007 | CA | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/526,829, filed Sep. 25, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,742,196, issued on Jun. 3, 2014), which is a national stage application of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/000233, filed Feb. 7, 2008, which claims benefit of Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,578,927, filed Feb. 19, 2007. Each of the aforementioned patent applications is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2310082 | Holbrooke | Feb 1943 | A |
2321363 | Crowley | Jun 1943 | A |
2349709 | Evans | May 1944 | A |
2399545 | Davis | Apr 1946 | A |
2415276 | Buckley et al. | Feb 1947 | A |
2508855 | Brown | May 1950 | A |
2592801 | Hanington | Apr 1952 | A |
2646040 | Stanton | Jul 1953 | A |
2740403 | Schueler | Apr 1956 | A |
2798492 | Barnes et al. | Jul 1957 | A |
2861006 | Salditt | Nov 1958 | A |
2940868 | Patchell | Jun 1960 | A |
3199548 | Conant | Aug 1965 | A |
3523859 | Komp | Aug 1970 | A |
3529597 | Pfaffenberger | Sep 1970 | A |
3618754 | Hoey | Nov 1971 | A |
3677250 | Thomas | Jul 1972 | A |
3811438 | Economou | May 1974 | A |
3853598 | Raguse | Dec 1974 | A |
3971374 | Wagner | Jul 1976 | A |
3989041 | Davies | Nov 1976 | A |
4141363 | James et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4207885 | Hampton et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4236550 | Braun et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4345590 | Nakajima | Aug 1982 | A |
4424808 | Schafer et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4485809 | Dellas | Dec 1984 | A |
4665909 | Trainor | May 1987 | A |
4699133 | Schafer et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702948 | Sieber-Gadient | Oct 1987 | A |
4734320 | Ohira | Mar 1988 | A |
4737400 | Edison et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4769028 | Hoffmann et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4891040 | Nagai et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4950282 | Beisang et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4999235 | Lunn et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5047285 | Ward | Sep 1991 | A |
5139476 | Peters | Aug 1992 | A |
D330255 | Nelson, Jr. | Oct 1992 | S |
5228458 | Ciacca | Jul 1993 | A |
5279891 | Ward | Jan 1994 | A |
5336162 | Ota et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336219 | Krantz | Aug 1994 | A |
5419913 | Podell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5480708 | Cheng | Jan 1996 | A |
5711312 | Staudinger | Jan 1998 | A |
5749843 | Miller | May 1998 | A |
5792091 | Staudinger | Aug 1998 | A |
5795834 | Deeb et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5827213 | Jensen | Oct 1998 | A |
5853750 | Dietz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861348 | Kase | Jan 1999 | A |
6010002 | Petterson | Jan 2000 | A |
6018092 | Dunshee | Jan 2000 | A |
6048806 | Deeb et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
D430295 | Ierulli | Aug 2000 | S |
D444562 | Kozub | Jul 2001 | S |
6277458 | Dirksing et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6447470 | Bodenschatz | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6455752 | Vesey | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6512158 | Dobos | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6559350 | Tetreault et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6849057 | Satou et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7066182 | Dunshee | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7419476 | Oohira et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
D609922 | Bridges et al. | Feb 2010 | S |
7902420 | Kase | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947366 | Ishiwatari et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
D640379 | Hope | Jun 2011 | S |
D670395 | Wakamatsu et al. | Nov 2012 | S |
D679405 | Arbesman | Apr 2013 | S |
8491514 | Creighton et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
D691276 | Bushby | Oct 2013 | S |
8814818 | Bushby | Aug 2014 | B2 |
D737986 | Arbesman | Sep 2015 | S |
D743566 | Arbesman | Nov 2015 | S |
9189978 | Tataryan et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9205002 | Kase et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
D765869 | Camper | Sep 2016 | S |
20030102239 | Beard | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030204159 | Lawry | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040168945 | Houze | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050182443 | Jonn et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050228323 | Tornai | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060089583 | Reinhardt | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089585 | Takemura et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080154169 | Kase | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090182256 | Lin | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100094191 | Netsner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110015556 | Fabo et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110288611 | Lunau et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120071808 | Sato et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120221044 | Archibald et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226214 | Gurtner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232448 | Wüst | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130012988 | Blume et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140079900 | Ramirez | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140276319 | Ibrahim et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150217098 | Hicken et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150328054 | Capobianco et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160051393 | Hahn et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160106595 | Arbesman et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160128950 | Mitroo | May 2016 | A1 |
20160262943 | Arbesman et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170049629 | Arbesman et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170056252 | Arbesman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170057197 | Arbesman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
D161901 | Nov 2015 | CA |
102178580 | Sep 2011 | CN |
36 40 979 | Aug 1987 | DE |
197 02 300 | Jul 1998 | DE |
0051935 | May 1982 | EP |
0 741 998 | Nov 1996 | EP |
1 260 565 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1 716 829 | Nov 2006 | EP |
54-49197 | Apr 1979 | JP |
S58155879 | Sep 1983 | JP |
61-39135 | Feb 1986 | JP |
61-257644 | Nov 1986 | JP |
63-135621 | Jun 1988 | JP |
64-061534 | Mar 1989 | JP |
187717 | Jun 1989 | JP |
64-040421 | Oct 1989 | JP |
2135017 | Nov 1990 | JP |
4-18512 | Jan 1992 | JP |
D832131 | Mar 1992 | JP |
D832133 | Mar 1992 | JP |
04092220 | Aug 1992 | JP |
7-43330 | Aug 1995 | JP |
08-112304 | May 1996 | JP |
2000-245771 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-000463 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-104366 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002233545 | Aug 2002 | JP |
3097985 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004236795 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004248842 | Sep 2004 | JP |
D1217902 | Sep 2004 | JP |
D1218142 | Sep 2004 | JP |
D1218143 | Sep 2004 | JP |
4-110723 | Jul 2008 | JP |
3019850003413 | Mar 1985 | KR |
300420095 | Jul 2006 | KR |
D1218144 | Jul 2006 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Michael B. Miller, Iatrogenic and Nurisgenic Effects of Prolonged Immobilization of the III Aged, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Jul. 1975, vol. XXIII, No. 7, pp. 360-369. |
O'Leary, M. Carroll, R. Mellor, A. Scott, and B. Vicenzino, The Effect of Soft Tissue Deloading Tape on Thoracic Spine Pressure Pain Thresholds in Asymptomatic Subjects, Manual Therapy, 2002, pp. 150-153, vol. 7 (3). |
Steven B. Purcell, Brynn E. Schuckman, Carrie L. Docherty, John Schrader, and Wendy Poppy, Differences in Ankle Range of Motion Before and After Exercise in 2 Tape Conditions, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009, pp. 383-389, vol. 37, No. 2. |
David M. Selkowitz, Casey Chaney, Sandra J. Stuckey, and Georgeanne Vlad, The Effects of Scapular Taping on the Surface Electromyographia Signal Amplitude of Shoulder Girdle Muscles During Upper Extremity Elevation in Individuals With Suspected Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Journal of Orthopaedic Sports Physical Therapy, Nov. 2007, vol. 37, No. 11. |
Anna Slupik, Michael Dwornik, Dariusz Bialoszewski, and Emilia Zych, Effect of Kinesio Taping on Bioelectrical Activity of Vastus Medialis Muscle Preliminary Report, Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, Medsportpress, Nov.-Dec. 2007, pp. 644-651, vol. 9. |
Mark D. Thelen, James A Dauber, and Paul D. Stoneman, The Clinical Efficacy of Kinesio Tape for Shoulder Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Clinical Trial, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, Jul. 2008, pp. 389-395, vol. 38, No. 7. |
Han-Ju Tsai, Hsiu-Chuan Hung, Jing-Lan Yang, Chiun-Sheng Huang, and Jau-Yih Tsauo, Could Kinesio Tape Replace the Bandage in Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy for Breast-Cancer-Related Lymphedema? A Pilot Study, Support Care Cancer, 2009, pp. 1353-1360. |
Audrey Yasukawa, Payal Patel, and Charles Sisung, Pilot Study: Investigating the Effects of Kinesio Taping in an Acute Pediatric Rehabilitation Setting, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Jan./Feb. 2006, pp. 104-110, vol. 60, No. 1. |
Ayako Yoshida and Leamor Kahanov, The Effect of Kinesio Taping on Lower Trunk Range of Motions, Research in Sports Medicine, 2007, pp. 103-112, vol. 15. |
Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2,578,927 dated Jan. 19, 2011. |
Kinesio Tex Website, dated May 8, 2008, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.kinesio-tape.com/KinesioTex1.html>, published 2007. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/CA2008/000233, dated May 14, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/902,313. |
Akuta Co., Ltd., “Maestro Kojy's Words of Encouragement—Go Into Business!”, New-Hale, Sep. 2006. |
Naoko Aminaka and Phillip A. Gribble, Patellar Taping, Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, Lower Extremity Kinematics and Dynamic Postural Control, Journal of Athletic Training, 2008, pp. 21-28, vol. 43(1). |
Dariusz Bialoszewski, Weronika Wozniak, and Slawomir Zarek, Clinical Efficacy of Kinesiology Taping in Reducing Edema of the Lower Limbs in Patients Treated With the Ilizarov Method—Preliminary Report, Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2009, pp. 46-54, vol. 11. |
A. M. Cools, E. E. Witvrouw, L. A. Danneels, and D. C. Cambier, Does Taping Influence Electromyographic Muscle Activity in the Scapular Rotators in Healthy Shoulders, Manual Therapy, 2002, pp. 154-162, vol. 7(3). |
Tieh-Cheng Fu, Alice M. K. Wong, Yu-Cheng Pei, Katie P. Wu, Shih-Wei Chou, and Yin-Chou Lin, Effect of Kinesio Taping on Muscle Strength in Athletes—A Pilot Study, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2008, pp. 198-201, vol. 11. |
J.M. Greve, J. D. Rossi, W. Cossermelli, and Filho Ferreira, Functional Rehabilitation of Degenerative Tendinous Injuries of the Shoulder, Rev. Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo, Mar.-Apr. 1991, vol. 46(2). |
Yin-Hsin Hsu, Wen-Yin Chen, Hsiu-Chen Lin, Wendy T. J. Wang, and Yi-Fen Shih, The Effects of Taping on Scapular Kinematics and Muscle Performance in Baseball Players with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 19, 2009, pp. 1092-1099. |
Ewa Jaraczewska and Carol Long, Kinesio Taping in Stroke: Improving Functional Use of the Upper Extremity in Hemiplegia, Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Summer 2006, pp. 31-42. |
Kenzo Kase, Illustrated Kinesio Taping, Fourth Edition, Ken'l Kai Information, 2005. |
Kenzo Kase, Jim Wallis, and Tsuyoshi Kase, Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method, 2nd Edition, Tokyo: Kenzo Kase, 2003. |
Kenzo Kase, Tasuyaki Hashimoto, and Tomoki Okane, Kinesio Taping Perfect Manual, 1996, Japan, Kinesio Taping Association. |
Yuh-Hwan Liu, Shu-Min Chen, Chi-Yi Lin, Chung-I Huang, and Yung-Nien Sun, Motion Tracking on Elbow Tissue from Ultrasonic Image Sequence for Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis, Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Lyon, France, Aug. 23-26, 2007, pp. 95-98. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 7, 2014, EPO Application No. 08 714 556.1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140213956 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12526829 | US | |
Child | 14242503 | US |