Predictive environmental characteristic map generation and control system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12069978
  • Patent Number
    12,069,978
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 8, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 27, 2024
    3 months ago
Abstract
An information map is obtained by an agricultural system. The information map maps values of a topographic characteristic to different geographic locations in a field. An in-situ sensor detects values of an environmental characteristic as an agricultural work machine moves through the field. A predictive map generator generates a predictive map that predicts the environmental characteristic at different locations in the field based on a relationship between the values of the topographic characteristic and the values of the environmental characteristic detected by the in-situ sensor. The predictive map can be output and used in automated machine control.
Description
FIELD OF THE DESCRIPTION

The present description relates to agricultural machines, forestry machines, construction machines and turf management machines.


BACKGROUND

There are a wide variety of different types of agricultural machines. Some agricultural machines include harvesters, such as combine harvesters, sugar cane harvesters, cotton harvesters, self-propelled forage harvesters, and windrowers. Some harvesters can also be fitted with different types of heads to harvest different types of crops.


The discussion above is merely provided for general background information and is not intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.


SUMMARY

An information map is obtained by an agricultural system. The information map maps values of a topographic characteristic to different geographic locations in a field. An in-situ sensor detects values of an environmental characteristic as an agricultural work machine moves through the field. A predictive map generator generates a predictive map that predicts the environmental characteristic at different locations in the field based on a relationship between the values of the topographic characteristic and the values of the environmental characteristic detected by the in-situ sensor. The predictive map can be output and used in automated machine control.


Example 1 is an agricultural system comprising:

    • a communication system that receives a topographic map that maps values of a topographic characteristic to different geographic locations in the field;
    • a geographic position sensor that detects a geographic location of the agricultural work machine;
    • an in-situ sensor that detects a value of an environmental characteristic corresponding to the geographic location;
    • a predictive model generator that generates a predictive environmental characteristic model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and the environmental characteristic based on the value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map corresponding to the geographic location and the value of the environmental characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location; and
    • a predictive map generator that generates a functional predictive environmental characteristic map of the field that maps predictive values of the environmental characteristic to the different geographic locations in the field based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map and based on the predictive environmental characteristic model.


Example 2 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the predictive map generator configures the functional predictive environmental characteristic map for consumption by a control system that generates control signals to control a controllable subsystem on the agricultural work machine based on the functional predictive environmental characteristic map.


Example 3 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a yield value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive yield model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and yield based on the yield value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive yield map that maps predictive yield values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive yield model.


Example 4 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a crop moisture value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive crop moisture model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and crop moisture based on the crop moisture value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive crop moisture map that maps predictive crop moisture values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive crop moisture model.


Example 5 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a soil moisture value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive soil moisture model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and soil moisture based on the soil moisture value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive soil moisture map that maps predictive soil moisture values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive soil moisture model.


Example 6 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a biomass value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive biomass model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and biomass based on the biomass value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive biomass map that maps predictive biomass values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive biomass model.


Example 7 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a crop state value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive crop state model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and crop state based on the crop state value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive crop state map that maps predictive crop state values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive crop state model.


Example 8 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a crop constituent value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive crop constituent model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and a crop constituent based on the crop constituent value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive crop constituent map that maps predictive crop constituent values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive crop constituent model.


Example 9 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a kernel size value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive kernel size model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and kernel size based on the kernel size value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive kernel size map that maps predictive kernel size values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive kernel size model.


Example 10 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a stalk size value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive stalk size model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and stalk size based on the stalk size value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive stalk size map that maps predictive stalk size values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive stalk size model.


Example 11 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, an ear size value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive ear size model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and ear size based on the ear size value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive ear size map that maps predictive ear size values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive ear size model.


Example 12 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a standing water value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive standing water model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and standing water based on the standing water value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive standing water map that maps predictive standing water values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive standing water model.


Example 13 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, an obscurants value,

    • wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive obscurants model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and obscurants based on the obscurants value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, and
    • wherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive obscurants map that maps predictive obscurants values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive obscurants model.


Example 14 is the agricultural system of any or all previous examples, wherein the predictive map generator outputs the functional predictive environmental characteristic map for presentation to an operator of the agricultural work machine.


Example 15 is a computer implemented method of generating a functional predictive environmental characteristic map, comprising:

    • receiving a topographic map that maps values of a topographic characteristic to different geographic locations in a field;
    • obtaining in-situ sensor data indicative of a value of an environmental characteristic corresponding to a geographic location at the field;
    • generating a predictive environmental characteristic model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and the environmental characteristic; and
    • controlling a predictive map generator to generate the functional predictive environmental characteristic map of the field, that maps predictive values of the environmental characteristic to the different locations in the field based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map and the predictive environmental characteristic model.


Example 16 is the computer implemented method of any or all previous examples and further comprising:

    • configuring the functional predictive environmental characteristic map for a control system that generates control signals to control a controllable subsystem on an agricultural work machine based on the functional predictive environmental characteristic map.


Example 17 is the computer implemented method of any or all previous examples and further comprising:

    • controlling a controllable subsystem of an agricultural work machine based on the functional predictive environmental characteristic map.


Example 18 is the computer implemented method of any or all previous examples, wherein obtaining in-situ sensor data indicative of the value of an environmental characteristic comprises obtaining in-situ sensor data indicative of two or more of a value of yield, a value of crop moisture, a value of soil moisture, a value of biomass, a value of crop state, a value of a crop constituent, a value of kernel size, a value of stalk size, a value of ear size, a value of standing water, and a value of obscurants.


Example 19 is the computer implemented method of any or all previous examples, wherein generating the predictive environmental characteristic model is indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and two or more of yield, crop moisture, soil moisture, biomass, crop state, the crop constituent, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, standing water, and obscurants, and

    • wherein the functional predictive environmental map of the field maps predictive values of two or more of yield, crop moisture, soil moisture, biomass, crop state, the crop constituent, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, standing water, and obscurants.


Example 20 is an agricultural work machine, comprising:

    • a communication system that receives a topographic map that maps values of a topographic characteristic to different geographic locations in a field;
    • a geographic position sensor that detects a geographic location of the agricultural work machine;
    • an in-situ sensor that detects a value of an environmental characteristic corresponding to a geographic location;
    • a predictive model generator that generates a predictive environmental characteristic model indicative of a relationship between values of the topographic characteristic and values of the environmental characteristic based on the value of the environmental characteristic detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location;
    • a predictive map generator that generates a functional predictive environmental characteristic map of the field, that maps predictive values of the environmental characteristic to the different locations in the field, based on the topographic values in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive environmental characteristic model; and
    • a control system that generates a control system based on the functional predictive environmental characteristic map and based on the geographic location of the agricultural work machine.


This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. The claimed subject matter is not limited to examples that solve any or all disadvantages noted in the background.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a partial pictorial, partial schematic illustration of one example of a combine harvester.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing some portions of an agricultural system, including an agricultural harvester, in more detail, according to some examples of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 3A-3B (collectively referred to herein as FIG. 3) show a flow diagram illustrating an example of operation of an agricultural system in generating a map.



FIG. 4A is a block diagram showing one example of a predictive model generator and a predictive map generator.



FIG. 4B is a block diagram showing in-situ environmental characteristic sensors.



FIG. 5A-5B (collectively referred to herein as FIG. 5) show a flow diagram illustrating an example of operation of a predictive model generator and predictive map generator.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing one example of an agricultural harvester in communication with a remote server environment.



FIGS. 7-9 show examples of mobile devices that can be used in an agricultural system, according to some examples of the present disclosure.



FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing one example of a computing environment that can be used in an agricultural system and the architectures illustrated in previous figures.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the present disclosure, reference will now be made to the examples illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the disclosure is intended. Any alterations and further modifications to the described devices, systems, methods, and any further application of the principles of the present disclosure are fully contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the disclosure relates. In particular, it is fully contemplated that the features, components, and/or steps described with respect to one example may be combined with the features, components, and/or steps described with respect to other examples of the present disclosure.


The present description relates to using in-situ data taken concurrently with an agricultural operation, in combination with data in an information map, to generate a predictive map and, more particularly, a predictive environmental characteristic map. In some examples, the predictive environmental characteristic map can be used to control an agricultural work machine, such as an agricultural harvester. As discussed above, performance of an agricultural harvester may vary with the variability of environmental characteristics at the field. The environmental characteristics may vary based on the topography of the location at the field to which they correspond. Without limitation, environmental characteristics may include characteristics at the worksite (including characteristics of the field) or characteristics of crop at the field.


A topographic map illustratively maps elevations of the ground across different geographic locations in a field of interest. Since ground slope is indicative of a change in elevation, having two or more elevation values allows for calculation of slope across the areas having known elevation values. Greater granularity of slope can be accomplished by having more areas with known elevation values. As an agricultural harvester travels across the terrain in known directions, the pitch and roll of the agricultural harvester can be determined based on the slope of the ground (i.e., areas of changing elevation). Topographic characteristics, when referred to below, can include, but are not limited to, the elevation, slope (e.g., including the machine orientation relative to the slope), and ground profile (e.g., roughness).


The present discussion thus proceeds with respect to systems that receive a topographic map of a field and also use an in-situ sensor to detect a value indicative of an environmental characteristic, during a harvesting operation. The systems generate a model that models a relationship between the topographic characteristics derived from the topographic map and the output values from the in-situ sensor. The model is used to generate a functional predictive environmental characteristic map that predicts the environmental characteristic (or an output value of the in-situ sensor) at different locations in the field. The functional predictive environmental characteristic map, generated during the harvesting operation, can be used in automatically controlling a harvester during the harvesting operation.



FIG. 1 is a partial pictorial, partial schematic, illustration of a self-propelled agricultural harvester 100. In the illustrated example, agricultural harvester 100 is a combine harvester. Further, although combine harvesters are provided as examples throughout the present disclosure, it will be appreciated that the present description is also applicable to other types of harvesters, such as cotton harvesters, sugarcane harvesters, self-propelled forage harvesters, windrowers, or other agricultural work machines. Consequently, the present disclosure is intended to encompass the various types of harvesters described and is, thus, not limited to combine harvesters. Moreover, the present disclosure is directed to other types of work machines, such as agricultural seeders and sprayers, construction equipment, forestry equipment, and turf management equipment where generation of a predictive map may be applicable. Consequently, the present disclosure is intended to encompass these various types of harvesters and other work machines and is, thus, not limited to combine harvesters.


As shown in FIG. 1, agricultural harvester 100 illustratively includes an operator compartment 101, which can have a variety of different operator interface mechanisms, for controlling agricultural harvester 100. Agricultural harvester 100 includes front-end equipment, such as a header 102, and a cutter generally indicated at 104. Agricultural harvester 100 also includes a feeder house 106, a feed accelerator 108, and a thresher generally indicated at 110. The feeder house 106 and the feed accelerator 108 form part of a material handling subsystem 125. Header 102 is pivotally coupled to a frame 103 of agricultural harvester 100 along pivot axis 105. One or more actuators 107 drive movement of header 102 about axis 105 in the direction generally indicated by arrow 109. Thus, a vertical position of header 102 (the header height) above ground 111 over which the header 102 travels is controllable by actuating actuator 107. While not shown in FIG. 1, agricultural harvester 100 may also include one or more actuators that operate to apply a tilt angle, a roll angle, or both to the header 102 or portions of header 102. Tilt refers to an angle at which the cutter 104 engages the crop. The tilt angle is increased, for example, by controlling header 102 to point a distal edge 113 of cutter 104 more toward the ground. The tilt angle is decreased by controlling header 102 to point the distal edge 113 of cutter 104 more away from the ground. The roll angle refers to the orientation of header 102 about the front-to-back longitudinal axis of agricultural harvester 100.


Thresher 110 illustratively includes a threshing rotor 112 and a set of concaves 114. Further, agricultural harvester 100 also includes a separator 116. Agricultural harvester 100 also includes a cleaning subsystem or cleaning shoe (collectively referred to as cleaning subsystem 118) that includes a cleaning fan 120, chaffer 122, and sieve 124. The material handling subsystem 125 also includes discharge beater 126, tailings elevator 128, clean grain elevator 130, as well as unloading auger 134 and spout 136. The clean grain elevator moves clean grain into clean grain tank 132. Agricultural harvester 100 also includes a residue subsystem 138 that can include chopper 140 and spreader 142. Agricultural harvester 100 also includes a propulsion subsystem that includes an engine that drives ground engaging components 144, such as wheels or tracks. In some examples, a combine harvester within the scope of the present disclosure may have more than one of any of the subsystems mentioned above. In some examples, agricultural harvester 100 may have left and right cleaning subsystems, separators, etc., which are not shown in FIG. 1.


In operation, and by way of overview, agricultural harvester 100 illustratively moves through a field in the direction indicated by arrow 147. As agricultural harvester 100 moves, header 102 (and the associated reel 164) engages the crop to be harvested and gathers the crop toward cutter 104. An operator of agricultural harvester 100 can be a local human operator, a remote human operator, or an automated system. The operator of agricultural harvester 100 may determine one or more of a height setting, a tilt angle setting, or a roll angle setting for header 102. For example, the operator inputs a setting or settings to a control system, described in more detail below, that controls actuator 107. The control system may also receive a setting from the operator for establishing the tilt angle and roll angle of the header 102 and implement the inputted settings by controlling associated actuators, not shown, that operate to change the tilt angle and roll angle of the header 102. The actuator 107 maintains header 102 at a height above ground 111 based on a height setting and, where applicable, at desired tilt and roll angles. Each of the height, roll, and tilt settings may be implemented independently of the others. The control system responds to header error (e.g., the difference between the height setting and measured height of header 104 above ground 111 and, in some examples, tilt angle and roll angle errors) with a responsiveness that is determined based on a sensitivity level. If the sensitivity level is set at a greater level of sensitivity, the control system responds to smaller header position errors, and attempts to reduce the detected errors more quickly than when the sensitivity is at a lower level of sensitivity.


Returning to the description of the operation of agricultural harvester 100, after crops are cut by cutter 104, the severed crop material is moved through a conveyor in feeder house 106 toward feed accelerator 108, which accelerates the crop material into thresher 110. The crop material is threshed by rotor 112 rotating the crop against concaves 114. The threshed crop material is moved by a separator rotor in separator 116 where a portion of the residue is moved by discharge beater 126 toward the residue subsystem 138. The portion of residue transferred to the residue subsystem 138 is chopped by residue chopper 140 and spread on the field by spreader 142. In other configurations, the residue is released from the agricultural harvester 100 in a windrow. In other examples, the residue subsystem 138 can include weed seed eliminators (not shown) such as seed baggers or other seed collectors, or seed crushers or other seed destroyers.


Grain falls to cleaning subsystem 118. Chaffer 122 separates some larger pieces of material from the grain, and sieve 124 separates some of finer pieces of material from the clean grain. Clean grain falls to an auger that moves the grain to an inlet end of clean grain elevator 130, and the clean grain elevator 130 moves the clean grain upwards, depositing the clean grain in clean grain tank 132. Residue is removed from the cleaning subsystem 118 by airflow generated by cleaning fan 120. Cleaning fan 120 directs air along an airflow path upwardly through the sieves and chaffers. The airflow carries residue rearwardly in agricultural harvester 100 toward the residue handling subsystem 138.


Tailings elevator 128 returns tailings to thresher 110 where the tailings are re-threshed. Alternatively, the tailings also may be passed to a separate re-threshing mechanism by a tailings elevator or another transport device where the tailings are re-threshed as well.



FIG. 1 also shows that, in one example, agricultural harvester 100 includes ground speed sensor 146, one or more separator loss sensors 148, a clean grain camera 150, a forward looking image capture mechanism 151, which may be in the form of a stereo or mono camera, and one or more loss sensors 152 provided in the cleaning subsystem 118.


Ground speed sensor 146 senses the travel speed of agricultural harvester 100 over the ground. Ground speed sensor 146 may sense the travel speed of the agricultural harvester 100 by sensing the speed of rotation of the ground engaging components (such as wheels or tracks), a drive shaft, an axle, or other components. In some instances, the travel speed may be sensed using a positioning system, such as a global positioning system (GPS), a dead reckoning system, a long range navigation (LORAN) system, a Doppler speed sensor, or a wide variety of other systems or sensors that provide an indication of travel speed. Ground speed sensors 146 can also include direction sensors such as a compass, a magnetometer, a gravimetric sensor, a gyroscope, GPS derivation, to determine the direction of travel in two or three dimensions in combination with the speed. This way, when agricultural harvester 100 is on a slope, the orientation of agricultural harvester 100 relative to the slope is known. For example, an orientation of agricultural harvester 100 could include ascending, descending or transversely travelling the slope. Machine or ground speed, when referred to in this disclosure can also include the two or three dimension direction of travel.


Loss sensors 152 illustratively provide an output signal indicative of the quantity of grain loss occurring in both the right and left sides of the cleaning subsystem 118. In some examples, sensors 152 are strike sensors which count grain strikes per unit of time or per unit of distance traveled to provide an indication of the grain loss occurring at the cleaning subsystem 118. The strike sensors for the right and left sides of the cleaning subsystem 118 may provide individual signals or a combined or aggregated signal. In some examples, sensors 152 may include a single sensor as opposed to separate sensors provided for each cleaning subsystem 118. Separator loss sensor 148 provides a signal indicative of grain loss in the left and right separators, not separately shown in FIG. 1. The separator loss sensors 148 may be associated with the left and right separators and may provide separate grain loss signals or a combined or aggregate signal. In some instances, sensing grain loss in the separators may also be performed using a wide variety of different types of sensors as well.


Agricultural harvester 100 may also include other sensors and measurement mechanisms. For instance, agricultural harvester 100 may include one or more of the following sensors: a header height sensor that senses a height of header 102 above ground 111; stability sensors that sense oscillation or bouncing motion (and amplitude) of agricultural harvester 100; a residue setting sensor that is configured to sense whether agricultural harvester 100 is configured to chop the residue, produce a windrow, etc.; a cleaning shoe fan speed sensor to sense the speed of fan 120; a concave clearance sensor that senses clearance between the rotor 112 and concaves 114; a threshing rotor speed sensor that senses a rotor speed of rotor 112; a chaffer clearance sensor that senses the size of openings in chaffer 122; a sieve clearance sensor that senses the size of openings in sieve 124; one or more machine setting sensors configured to sense various configurable settings of agricultural harvester 100; a machine orientation sensor that senses the orientation of agricultural harvester 100; a material other than grain (MOG) moisture sensor that senses a moisture level of the MOG passing through agricultural harvester 100; and crop property sensors that sense a variety of different types of crop properties, such as crop type, crop moisture, and other crop properties. Crop property sensors may also be configured to sense characteristics of the severed crop material as the crop material is being processed by agricultural harvester 100. For example, in some instances, the crop property sensors may sense grain quality such as broken grain; MOG levels; grain constituents such as starches and protein; grain moisture; and grain feed rate as the grain travels through the feeder house 106, clean grain elevator 130, or elsewhere in the agricultural harvester 100. The crop property sensors may also sense the feed rate of biomass through feeder house 106, through the separator 116 or elsewhere in agricultural harvester 100. The crop property sensors may also sense the feed rate as a mass flow rate of grain through elevator 130 or through other portions of the agricultural harvester 100 or provide other output signals indicative of other sensed variables.


It should be noted that crop moisture can broadly refer to the moisture of the crop plant (e.g., corn plant) which includes both grain (e.g., corn kernels) and material other than grain (e.g., leaves, stalk, etc.) Thus crop moisture can be inclusive of the both grain moisture and moisture of material other than grain (e.g., MOG moisture).


Examples of sensors used to detect or sense the power characteristics include, but are not limited to, a voltage sensor, a current sensor, a torque sensor, a hydraulic pressure sensor, a hydraulic flow sensor, a force sensor, a bearing load sensor and a rotational sensor. Power characteristics can be measured at varying levels of granularity. For instance, power usage can be sensed machine-wide, subsystem-wide or by individual components of the subsystems.


Examples of sensors used to detect internal material distribution include, but are not limited to, one or more cameras, capacitive sensors, electromagnetic or ultrasonic time-of-flight reflective sensors, signal attenuation sensors, weight or mass sensors, material flow sensors, etc. These sensors can be placed at one or more locations in agricultural harvester 100 to sense the distribution of the material in agricultural harvester 100, during the operation of agricultural harvester 100.


Examples of sensors used to detect or sense a pitch or roll of agricultural harvester 100 include accelerometers, gyroscopes, inertial measurement units, gravimetric sensors, magnetometers, etc. These sensors can also be indicative of the slope of the terrain that agricultural harvester 100 is currently on.


Prior to describing how agricultural harvester 100 generates a functional predictive environmental characteristic map, and uses the functional predictive environmental characteristic map for control, a brief description of some of the items on agricultural harvester 100, and their operation, will first be described. The description of FIGS. 2 and 3 describe receiving a general type of information map and combining information from the information map with georeferenced sensor data (e.g., signal, image, etc.) generated by an in-situ sensor, where the sensor data is indicative of an environmental characteristic at the field. Environmental characteristics at the “field” may include, but are not limited to, soil moisture, standing water, obscurants (e.g., dust or other debris in the air), various plant or crop properties, such as biomass, yield, crop moisture, crop state, crop constituents, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, as well various other environmental characteristics. A relationship between the environmental characteristic values obtained from in-situ sensor data and the information map values is identified, and that relationship is used to generate a functional predictive map. A functional predictive map predicts values at different geographic locations in a field, and one or more of those values can be used for controlling a machine. In some instances, a functional predictive map can be presented to a user, such as an operator of an agricultural work machine, which may be an agricultural harvester, or another user, or both. A functional predictive map can be presented to a user visually, such as via a display, haptically, or audibly. The user can interact with the functional predictive map to perform editing operations and other user interface operations. In some instances, a functional predictive map can be used for one or more of controlling an agricultural work machine, such as an agricultural harvester, presentation to an operator or other user, and presentation to an operator or user for interaction by the operator or user.


After the general approach is described with respect to FIGS. 2 and 3, a more specific approach for generating a functional predictive map that can be presented to an operator or user, or used to control agricultural harvester 100, or both, is described with respect to FIGS. 4 and 5. Again, while the present discussion proceeds with respect to the agricultural harvester and, particularly, a combine harvester, the scope of the present disclosure encompasses other types of agricultural harvesters or other agricultural work machines.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing some portions of an example agricultural system 200 that includes, among other things, an agricultural harvester 100. FIG. 2 shows that agricultural harvester 100 illustratively includes one or more processors or servers 201, data store 202, geographic position sensor 204, communication system 206, and one or more in-situ sensors 208 that sense one or more agricultural characteristics of a field concurrent with a harvesting operation. An agricultural characteristic can include any characteristic that can have an effect of the harvesting operation. Some examples of agricultural characteristics include environmental characteristics. Agricultural characteristics can also include characteristics of the machine, such as the harvesting machine. Other types of agricultural characteristics are also included. The in-situ sensors 208 generate values corresponding to the sensed characteristics. The agricultural harvester 100 also includes a predictive model or relationship generator (collectively referred to hereinafter as “predictive model generator 210”), predictive map generator 212, control zone generator 213, control system 214, one or more controllable subsystems 216, and an operator interface mechanism 218. The agricultural harvester 100 can also include a wide variety of other agricultural harvester functionality 220. The in-situ sensors 208 include, for example, on-board sensors 222, remote sensors 224, and other sensors 226 that sense characteristics at a field during the course of an agricultural operation. Predictive model generator 210 illustratively includes an information variable-to-in-situ variable model generator 228, and predictive model generator 210 can include other items 230. Control system 214 includes communication system controller 229, operator interface controller 231, a settings controller 232, path planning controller 234, feed rate controller 236, header and reel controller 238, draper belt controller 240, deck plate position controller 242, residue system controller 244, machine cleaning controller 245, zone controller 247, and system 214 can include other items 246. Controllable subsystems 216 include machine and header actuators 248, propulsion subsystem 250, steering subsystem 252, residue subsystem 138, machine cleaning subsystem 254, and subsystems 216 can include a wide variety of other subsystems 256.



FIG. 2 also shows that agricultural harvester 100 can receive one or more information maps 258. As described below, the information maps 258 include, for example, a topographic map from a prior operation at the field, such as an unmanned aerial vehicle completing a range scanning operation from a known altitude, a topographic map sensed by a plane, a topographic map sensed by a satellite, a topographic map sensed by a ground vehicle, such as a GPS-equipped planter, etc. However, map information may also encompass other types of data that were obtained prior to a harvesting operation or a map from a prior operation. For instance, a topographic map can be retrieved from a remote source such as the United States Geological Survey (USGS). FIG. 2 also shows that an operator 260 may operate the agricultural harvester 100. The operator 260 interacts with operator interface mechanisms 218. In some examples, operator interface mechanisms 218 may include joysticks, levers, a steering wheel, linkages, pedals, buttons, dials, keypads, user actuatable elements (such as icons, buttons, etc.) on a user interface display device, a microphone and speaker (where speech recognition and speech synthesis are provided), among a wide variety of other types of control devices. Where a touch sensitive display system is provided, operator 260 may interact with operator interface mechanisms 218 using touch gestures. These examples described above are provided as illustrative examples and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. Consequently, other types of operator interface mechanisms 218 may be used and are within the scope of the present disclosure.


Information maps 258 may be downloaded onto agricultural harvester 100 and stored in data store 202, using communication system 206 or in other ways. In some examples, communication system 206 may be a cellular communication system, a system for communicating over a wide area network or a local area network, a system for communicating over a near field communication network, or a communication system configured to communicate over any of a variety of other networks or combinations of networks. Communication system 206 may also include a system that facilitates downloads or transfers of information to and from a secure digital (SD) card or a universal serial bus (USB) card or both.


Geographic position sensor 204 illustratively senses or detects the geographic position or location of agricultural harvester 100. Geographic position sensor 204 can include, but is not limited to, a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver that receives signals from a GNSS satellite transmitter. Geographic position sensor 204 can also include a real-time kinematic (RTK) component that is configured to enhance the precision of position data derived from the GNSS signal. Geographic position sensor 204 can include a dead reckoning system, a cellular triangulation system, or any of a variety of other geographic position sensors.


In-situ sensors 208 may be any of the sensors described above with respect to FIG. 1 or below with respect to FIG. 4. In-situ sensors 208 include on-board sensors 222 that are mounted on-board agricultural harvester 100. Such sensors may include, for instance, a speed sensor (e.g., a GPS, speedometer, or compass), image sensors that are internal to agricultural harvester 100 (such as the clean grain camera or cameras mounted to identify material distribution in agricultural harvester 100, for example, in the residue subsystem or the cleaning system), grain loss sensors, tailings characteristic sensors, and grain quality sensors. The in-situ sensors 208 also include remote in-situ sensors 224 that capture in-situ information. In-situ data include data taken from a sensor on-board the harvester or taken by any sensor where the data are detected during the harvesting operation.


Predictive model generator 210 generates a model that is indicative of a relationship between the values sensed by the in-situ sensor 208 and a characteristic mapped to the field by the information map 258. For example, if an information map 258 maps a topographic characteristic to different locations in the field, and the in-situ sensor 208 is sensing a value indicative of an environmental characteristic, then mapped information variable-to-in-situ variable model generator 228 generates a predictive environmental characteristic model that models the relationship between the topographic characteristics and the environmental characteristic. The predictive environmental characteristic model can also be generated based on topographic characteristics from the information map 258 and multiple in-situ data values generated by in-situ sensors 208. Then, predictive map generator 212 uses the predictive environmental characteristic model generated by predictive model generator 210 to generate a functional predictive environmental characteristic map that predicts the value of an environmental characteristic, sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 at different locations in the field based upon the information map 258.


In some examples, the type of values in the functional predictive map 263 may be the same as the in-situ data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208. In some instances, the type of values in the functional predictive map 263 may have different units from the data sensed by the in-situ sensors 208. In some examples, the type of values in the functional predictive map 263 may be different from the data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 but have a relationship to the type of data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208. For example, in some examples, the data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 may be indicative of the type of values in the functional predictive map 263. In some examples, the type of data in the functional predictive map 263 may be different than the data type in the information map 258. In some instances, the type of data in the functional predictive map 263 may have different units from the data in the information map 258. In some examples, the type of data in the functional predictive map 263 may be different from the data type in the information map 258 but has a relationship to the data type in the information map 258. For example, in some examples, the data type in the information map 258 may be indicative of the type of data in the functional predictive map 263. In some examples, the type of data in the functional predictive map 263 is different than one of, or both of the in-situ data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 and the data type in the information map 258. In some examples, the type of data in the functional predictive map 263 is the same as one of, or both of, of the in-situ data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 and the data type in information map 258. In some examples, the type of data in the functional predictive map 263 is the same as one of the in-situ data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 or the data type in the information map 258, and different than the other.


Predictive map generator 212 can use the topographic characteristics in information map 258, and the model generated by predictive model generator 210, to generate a functional predictive map 263 that predicts the environmental characteristics at different locations in the field. Predictive map generator 212 thus outputs predictive map 264.


As shown in FIG. 2, predictive map 264 predicts the value of one or more sensed characteristics (sensed by in-situ sensors 208), or one or more characteristics related to the one or more sensed characteristics, at various locations across the field based upon an information value in information map 258 at those locations and using the predictive model. For example, if predictive model generator 210 has generated a predictive model indicative of a relationship between a topographic characteristic and an environmental characteristic, then, given the topographic characteristics at different locations across the field, predictive map generator 212 generates a predictive map 264 that predicts the value of the environmental characteristic at different locations across the field. The topographic characteristic, obtained from the topographic map, at those locations and the relationship between the topographic characteristic and the environmental characteristic, obtained from the predictive model, are used to generate the predictive map 264. The predicted environmental characteristic can be used by a control system to adjust, for example, settings of the various subsystems based on the predictive environmental characteristic.


Some variations in the data types that are mapped in the information map 258, the data types sensed by in-situ sensors 208 and the data types predicted on the predictive map 264 will now be described.


In some examples, the data type in the information map 258 is different from the data type sensed by in-situ sensors 208, yet the data type in the predictive map 264 is the same as the data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208. For instance, the information map 258 may be a topographic map, and the variable sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 may be an environmental characteristic. The predictive map 264 may then be a predictive environmental characteristic map that maps predicted environmental characteristic values to different geographic locations in the field.


Also, in some examples, the data type in the information map 258 is different from the data type sensed by in-situ sensors 208, and the data type in the predictive map 264 is different from both the data type in the information map 258 and the data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208.


In some examples, the information map 258 is from a prior operation through the field and the data type is different from the data type sensed by in-situ sensors 208, yet the data type in the predictive map 264 is the same as the data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208. For instance, the information map 258 may be a topographic map generated during planting, and the variable sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 may be an environmental characteristic. The predictive map 264 may then be a predictive environmental characteristic map that maps predicted environmental characteristic values to different geographic locations in the field.


In some examples, the information map 258 is from a prior operation through the field and the data type is the same as the data type sensed by in-situ sensors 208, and the data type in the predictive map 264 is also the same as the data type sensed by the in-situ sensors 208.


In some examples, predictive map 264 can be provided to the control zone generator 213. Control zone generator 213 groups contiguous individual point data values on predictive map 264, into control zones. A control zone may include two or more contiguous portions of an area, such as a field, for which a control parameter corresponding to the control zone for controlling a controllable subsystem is constant. For example, a response time to alter a setting of controllable subsystems 216 may be inadequate to satisfactorily respond to changes in values contained in a map, such as predictive map 264. In that case, control zone generator 213 parses the map and identifies control zones that are of a defined size to accommodate the response time of the controllable subsystems 216. In another example, control zones may be sized to reduce wear from excessive actuator movement resulting from continuous adjustment. In some examples, there may be a different set of control zones for each controllable subsystem 216 or for groups of controllable subsystems 216. The control zones may be added to the predictive map 264 to obtain predictive control zone map 265. Predictive control zone map 265 can thus be similar to predictive map 264 except that predictive control zone map 265 includes control zone information defining the control zones. Thus, a functional predictive map 263, as described herein, may or may not include control zones. Both predictive map 264 and predictive control zone map 265 are functional predictive maps 263. In one example, a functional predictive map 263 does not include control zones, such as predictive map 264. In another example, a functional predictive map 263 does include control zones, such as predictive control zone map 265. In some examples, multiple crops may be simultaneously present in a field if an intercrop production system is implemented. In that case, predictive map generator 212 and control zone generator 213 are able to identify the location and characteristics of the two or more crops and then generate predictive map 264 and predictive control zone map 265 accordingly.


It will also be appreciated that control zone generator 213 can cluster values to generate control zones and the control zones can be added to predictive control zone map 265, or a separate map, showing only the control zones that are generated. In some examples, the control zones may only be used for controlling or calibrating agricultural harvester 100 or both. In other examples, the control zones may be presented to the operator 260 and used to control or calibrate agricultural harvester 100 and in other examples the control zones may just be presented to the operator 260 or another user or stored for later use.


Predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both are provided to control system 214, which generates control signals based upon the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both. In some examples, communication system controller 229 controls communication system 206 to communicate the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or control signals based on the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 to other agricultural harvesters that are harvesting in the same field. In some examples, communication system controller 229 controls the communication system 206 to send the predictive map 264, predictive control zone map 265, or both to other remote systems.


In some examples, predictive map 264 can be provided to route/mission generator 267. Route/mission generator 267 plots a travel path for agricultural harvester 100 to travel on during the harvesting operation based on predictive map 264. The travel path can also include machine control settings corresponding to locations along the travel path as well. For example, if a travel path ascends a hill, then at a point prior to hill ascension, the travel path can include a control indicative of directing power to propulsion systems to maintain a speed or feed rate of agricultural harvester 100. In some examples, route/mission generator 267 analyzes the predicted environmental characteristics according to predictive map 264, for a plurality of different travel routes, and selects a route that has desirable results (such as, quick harvest time or other desired performance parameters, such as yield, loss, etc.). As an illustrative example, the predictive map 264 may predict, as an environmental characteristic, obscurants at different geographic locations in the worksite. Route/mission generator 267 may then plot a travel path for agricultural harvester 100 to travel to avoid the obscurants.


Operator interface controller 231 is operable to generate control signals to control operator interface mechanisms 218. The operator interface controller 231 is also operable to present the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or other information derived from or based on the predictive map 264, predictive control zone map 265, or both to operator 260. Operator 260 may be a local operator or a remote operator. As an example, controller 231 generates control signals to control a display mechanism to display one or both of predictive map 264 and predictive control zone map 265 for the operator 260. Controller 231 may generate operator actuatable mechanisms that are displayed and can be actuated by the operator to interact with the displayed map. The operator can edit the map by, for example, correcting an environmental characteristic displayed on the map, based on the operator's observation. Settings controller 232 can generate control signals to control various settings on the agricultural harvester 100 based upon predictive map 264, the predictive control zone map 265, or both. For instance, settings controller 232 can generate control signals to control machine and header actuators 248. In response to the generated control signals, the machine and header actuators 248 operate to control, for example, one or more of the sieve and chaffer settings, thresher clearance, rotor settings, cleaning fan speed settings, header height (or cut height), header functionality, reel speed, reel position, draper functionality (where agricultural harvester 100 is coupled to a draper header), corn header functionality, internal distribution control and other actuators 248 that affect the other functions of the agricultural harvester 100. Path planning controller 234 illustratively generates control signals to control steering subsystem 252 to steer agricultural harvester 100 according to a desired path. Path planning controller 234 can control a path planning system to generate a route for agricultural harvester 100 and can control propulsion subsystem 250 and steering subsystem 252 to steer agricultural harvester 100 along that route. Feed rate controller 236 can control various subsystems, such as propulsion subsystem 250 and machine actuators 248, to control a feed rate based upon the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both. For instance, as agricultural harvester 100 approaches a declining terrain having a predictive environmental characteristic value above a selected threshold, feed rate controller 236 may reduce the speed of machine 100 to maintain constant feed rate of biomass through the agricultural harvester 100. Header and reel controller 238 can generate control signals to control a header or a reel or other header functionality. Draper belt controller 240 can generate control signals to control a draper belt or other draper functionality based upon the predictive map 264, predictive control zone map 265, or both. For example, as agricultural harvester 100 approaches a declining terrain having a predicted environmental characteristic value above a selected threshold, draper belt controller 240 may increase the speed of the draper belts to prevent backup of material on the belts. Deck plate position controller 242 can generate control signals to control a position of a deck plate included on a header based on predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both, and residue system controller 244 can generate control signals to control a residue subsystem 138 based upon predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265, or both. Machine cleaning controller 245 can generate control signals to control machine cleaning subsystem 254. For instance, as agricultural harvester 100 is about to travel on an area of the field where it is predicted that the biomass will increase, machine cleaning controller 245 can adjust cleaning subsystem 254 to account for the additional biomass. Other controllers included on the agricultural harvester 100 can control other subsystems based on the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both as well.



FIGS. 3A and 3B (collectively referred to herein as FIG. 3) show a flow diagram illustrating one example of the operation of agricultural system 200 in generating a predictive map 264 and predictive control zone map 265 based upon information map 258.


At 280, agricultural system 200 receives one or more information maps 258. Examples of information maps 258 or receiving information maps 258 are discussed with respect to blocks 281, 282, 284 and 286. As discussed above, information maps 258 map values of a variable, corresponding to a first characteristic, to different locations in the field, as indicated at block 282. As indicated at block 281, receiving the information maps 258 may involve selecting one or more of a plurality of possible information maps that are available. For instance, one information map may be a terrain profile map generated from aerial phase profilometry imagery. Another information map may be a map generated during a prior pass through the field which may have been performed by a different machine performing a previous operation in the field, such as a sprayer or other machine. The process by which one or more information maps are selected can be manual, semi-automated or automated. The information maps 258 are based on data collected prior to a current harvesting operation. This is indicated by block 284. For instance, the data may be collected by a GPS receiver mounted on a piece of equipment during a prior field operation. For instance, the data may be collected in a lidar range scanning operation during a previous year, or earlier in the current growing season, or at other times. The data may be based on data detected or received in ways other than using lidar range scanning. For instance, a drone equipped with a fringe projection profilometry system may detect the profile or elevation of the terrain. Or for instance, some topographic features can be estimated based on weather patterns, such as the formation of ruts due to erosion or the breakup of clumps over freeze-thaw cycles. In some examples, information maps 258 may be created by combining data from a number of sources such as those listed above. Or for instance, the data for the information maps 258, such as a topographic map can be transmitted to agricultural harvester 100 using communication system 206 and stored in data store 202. The data for the information maps 258 can be provided to agricultural harvester 100 using communication system 206 in other ways as well, and this is indicated by block 286 in the flow diagram of FIG. 3. In some examples, the information map 258 can be received by communication system 206.


Upon commencement of a harvesting operation, in-situ sensors 208 generate sensor signals indicative of one or more in-situ data values indicative of one or more environmental characteristics characteristic, for example, yield, crop moisture, soil moisture, biomass, crop state, crop constituents, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, standing water, and obscurants. Examples of in-situ sensors 288 are discussed with respect to blocks 222, 290, and 226. As explained above, the in-situ sensors 208 include on-board sensors 222; remote in-situ sensors 224, such as UAV-based sensors flown at a time to gather in-situ data, shown in block 290; or other types of in-situ sensors, designated by in-situ sensors 226. In some examples, data from on-board sensors is georeferenced using position, heading or speed data from geographic position sensor 204.


Predictive model generator 210 controls the mapped information variable-to-in-situ variable model generator 228 to generate a model that models a relationship between the mapped values contained in the information map 258 and the in-situ values sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 as indicated by block 292. The characteristics or data types represented by the mapped values in the information map 258 and the in-situ values sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 may be the same characteristics or data type or different characteristics or data types.


The relationship or model generated by predictive model generator 210 is provided to predictive map generator 212. Predictive map generator 212 generates a predictive map 264 that predicts a value of the characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 at different geographic locations in a field being harvested, or a different characteristic that is related to the characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensors 208, using the predictive model and the information map 258, as indicated by block 294.


It should be noted that, in some examples, the information map 258 may include two or more different maps or two or more different map layers of a single map. Each map in the two or more different maps or each layer in the two or more different map layers of a single map, map a different type of variable to the geographic locations in the field. In such an example, predictive model generator 210 generates a predictive model that models the relationship between the in-situ data and each of the different variables mapped by the two or more different maps or the two or more different map layers. Similarly, the in-situ sensors 208 can include two or more sensors each sensing a different type of variable. Thus, the predictive model generator 210 generates a predictive model that models the relationships between each type of variable mapped by the information map 258 and each type of variable sensed by the in-situ sensors 208. Predictive map generator 212 can generate a functional predictive map 263 that predicts a value for each sensed characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensors 208 (or a characteristic related to the sensed characteristic) at different locations in the field being harvested using the predictive model and each of the maps or map layers in the information map 258.


Predictive map generator 212 configures the predictive map 264 so that the predictive map 264 is actionable (or consumable) by control system 214. Predictive map generator 212 can provide the predictive map 264 to the control system 214 or to control zone generator 213 or both. Some examples of different ways in which the predictive map 264 can be configured or output are described with respect to blocks 296, 293, 295, 299 and 297. For instance, predictive map generator 212 configures predictive map 264 so that predictive map 264 includes values that can be read by control system 214 and used as the basis for generating control signals for one or more of the different controllable subsystems of the agricultural harvester 100, as indicated by block 296.


Route/mission generator 267 plots a travel path for agricultural harvester 100 to travel on during the harvesting operation based on predictive map 204, as indicated by block 293. Control zone generator 213 can divide the predictive map 264 into control zones based on the values on the predictive map 264. Contiguously-geolocated values that are within a threshold value of one another can be grouped into a control zone. The threshold value can be a default threshold value, or the threshold value can be set based on an operator input, based on an input from an automated system or based on other criteria. A size of the zones may be based on a responsiveness of the control system 214, the controllable subsystems 216, or based on wear considerations, or on other criteria as indicated by block 295. Predictive map generator 212 configures predictive map 264 for presentation to an operator or other user. Control zone generator 213 can configure predictive control zone map 265 for presentation to an operator or other user. This is indicated by block 299. When presented to an operator or other user, the presentation of the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both may contain one or more of the predictive values on the predictive map 264 correlated to geographic location, the control zones on predictive control zone map 265 correlated to geographic location, and settings values or control parameters that are used based on the predicted values on map 264 or zones on predictive control zone map 265. The presentation can, in another example, include more abstracted information or more detailed information. The presentation can also include a confidence level that indicates an accuracy with which the predictive values on predictive map 264 or the zones on predictive control zone map 265 conform to measured values that may be measured by sensors on agricultural harvester 100 as agricultural harvester 100 moves through the field. Further where information is presented to more than one location, an authentication or authorization system can be provided to implement authentication and authorization processes. For instance, there may be a hierarchy of individuals that are authorized to view and change maps and other presented information. By way of example, an on-board display device may show the maps in near real time locally on the machine, only, or the maps may also be generated at one or more remote locations. In some examples, each physical display device at each location may be associated with a person or a user permission level. The user permission level may be used to determine which display elements are visible on the physical display device, and which values the corresponding person may change. As an example, a local operator of machine 100 may be unable to see the information corresponding to the predictive map 264 or make any changes to machine operation. A supervisor, at a remote location, however, may be able to see the predictive map 264 on the display, but not make changes. A manager, who may be at a separate remote location, may be able to see all of the elements on predictive map 264 and also change the predictive map 264 that is used in machine control. This is one example of an authorization hierarchy that may be implemented. The predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both can be configured in other ways as well, as indicated by block 297.


At block 298, input from geographic position sensor 204 and other in-situ sensors 208 are received by the control system. Block 300 represents receipt by control system 214 of an input from the geographic position sensor 204 identifying a geographic location of agricultural harvester 100. Block 302 represents receipt by the control system 214 of sensor inputs indicative of trajectory or heading of agricultural harvester 100, and block 304 represents receipt by the control system 214 of a speed of agricultural harvester 100. Block 306 represents receipt by the control system 214 of other information from various in-situ sensors 208.


At block 308, control system 214 generates control signals to control the controllable subsystems 216 based on the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both and the input from the geographic position sensor 204 and any other in-situ sensors 208. At block 310, control system 214 applies the control signals to the controllable subsystems 216. It will be appreciated that the particular control signals that are generated, and the particular controllable subsystems 216 that are controlled, may vary based upon one or more different things. For example, the control signals that are generated and the controllable subsystems 216 that are controlled may be based on the type of predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both that is being used. Similarly, the control signals that are generated and the controllable subsystems 216 that are controlled, and the timing of the control signals can be based on various latencies of the agricultural harvester 100 and the responsiveness of the controllable subsystems 216.


By way of example, a generated predictive map 264 in the form of a predictive environmental characteristic map can be used to control one or more subsystems 216. For instance, the predictive environmental characteristic map can include environmental characteristic values georeferenced to locations within the field being harvested. The predictive environmental characteristic values from the predictive environmental characteristic map can be extracted and used to control the controllable subsystems 216 of the agricultural harvester 100 as the agricultural harvester 100 moves through the field.


At block 312, a determination is made as to whether the harvesting operation has been completed. If harvesting is not completed the processing advances to block 314 where in-situ sensor data from geographic position sensor 204 and in-situ sensors 208 (and perhaps other sensors) continues to be read.


In some examples, at block 316, agricultural harvester 100 can also detect learning trigger criteria to perform machine learning on one or more of the predictive map 264, predictive control zone map 265, the model generated by predictive model generator 210, the zones generated by control zone generator 213, one or more control algorithms implemented by the controllers in the control system 214, and other triggered learning.


The learning trigger criteria can include any of a wide variety of different criteria. Some examples of detecting trigger criteria are discussed with respect to blocks 318, 320, 321, 322 and 324. For instance, in some examples, triggered learning can involve recreation of a relationship used to generate a predictive model when a threshold amount of in-situ sensor data are obtained from in-situ sensors 208. In such examples, receipt of an amount of in-situ sensor data from the in-situ sensors 208 that exceeds a threshold triggers or causes the predictive model generator 210 to generate a new predictive model that is used by predictive map generator 212. Thus, as agricultural harvester 100 continues a harvesting operation, receipt of the threshold amount of in-situ sensor data from the in-situ sensors 208 triggers the creation of a new relationship represented by a predictive model generated by predictive model generator 210. Further, new predictive map 264, predictive control zone map 265, or both can be regenerated using the new predictive model. Block 318 represents detecting a threshold amount of in-situ sensor data used to trigger creation of a new predictive model.


In other examples, the learning trigger criteria may be based on how much the in-situ sensor data from the in-situ sensors 208 are changing from previous values or from a threshold value. For example, if variations within the in-situ sensor data (or the relationship between the in-situ sensor data and the information in information map 258) is within a range, is less than a defined amount, or below a threshold value, then a new predictive model is not generated by the predictive model generator 210. As a result, the predictive map generator 212 does not generate a new predictive map 264, predictive control zone map 265, or both. However, if variations within the in-situ sensor data exceed the range or exceed the predefined amount or the threshold value, for example, or if a relationship between the in-situ sensor data and the information in information map 258 varies by a defined amount, for example, then the predictive model generator 210 generates a new predictive model using all or a portion of the newly received in-situ sensor data that the predictive map generator 212 uses to generate a new predictive map 264. At block 320, variations in the in-situ sensor data, such as a magnitude of an amount by which the data exceeds the selected range or a magnitude of the variation of the relationship between the in-situ sensor data and the information in the information map 258, can be used as a trigger to cause generation of a new predictive model and predictive map. The threshold, the range and the defined amount can be set to default values, or set by an operator or user interaction through a user interface, or set by an automated system or in other ways.


Other learning trigger criteria can also be used. For instance, if predictive model generator 210 switches to a different information map (different from the originally selected information map 258), then switching to the different information map may trigger re-learning by predictive model generator 210, predictive map generator 212, control zone generator 213, control system 214, or other items. In another example, transitioning of agricultural harvester 100 to a different topography or to a different control zone may be used as learning trigger criteria as well.


In some instances, operator 260, or another user, can also edit the predictive map 264 or predictive control zone map 265 or both. The edits can change a value on the predictive map 264 or, change the size, shape, position or existence of a control zone, or a value on predictive control zone map 265 or both. Block 321 shows that edited information can be used as learning trigger criteria.


In some instances, it may also be that operator 260, or other user, observes that automated control of a controllable subsystem, is not what the operator, or other user, desires. In such instances, the operator 260, or other user, may provide a manual adjustment to the controllable subsystem reflecting that the operator 260, or other user, desires the controllable subsystem to operate in a different way than is being commanded by control system 214. Thus, manual alteration of a setting by the operator 260, or other user, can cause predictive model generator 210 to relearn a model, predictive map generator 212 to regenerate map 264, control zone generator 213 to regenerate the control zones on predictive control zone map 265 and control system 214 to relearn its control algorithm or to perform machine learning on one of the controller components 232-246 in control system 214 based upon the adjustment by the operator 260, as shown in block 322. Block 324 represents the use of other triggered learning criteria.


In other examples, relearning may be performed periodically or intermittently based, for example, upon a selected time interval such as a discrete time interval or a variable time interval. This is indicated by block 326.


If relearning is triggered, whether based upon learning trigger criteria or based upon passage of a time interval, as indicated by block 326, then one or more of the predictive model generator 210, predictive map generator 212, control zone generator 213 and control system 214 performs machine learning to generate new predictive model(s), new predictive map(s), new control zone(s), and new control algorithm(s), respectively, based upon the learning trigger criteria. The new predictive model(s), the new predictive map(s), new control zone(s), and the new control algorithm(s) are generated using any additional data that has been collected since the last learning operation was performed. Performing relearning is indicated by block 328.


If the harvesting operation has been completed, operation moves from block 312 to block 330 where one or more of the predictive map(s) 264, predictive control zone map(s) 265, the predictive model(s) generated by predictive model generator 210, the control zone(s), and the control algorithm(s) are stored. The predictive map(s) 264, predictive control zone map(s) 265, predictive model(s), control zone(s), and control algorithm(s) may be stored locally on data store 202 or sent to a remote system using communication system 206 for later use.


It will be noted that while some examples herein describe predictive model generator 210 and predictive map generator 212 receiving an information map in generating a predictive model and a functional predictive map, respectively, in other examples, the predictive model generator 210 and predictive map generator 212 can receive other types of maps, including predictive maps, such as a functional predictive map generated during the harvesting operation.



FIG. 4A is a block diagram of a portion of the agricultural system 200 shown in FIG. 2. Particularly, FIG. 4A shows, among other things, examples of the predictive model generator 210 and the predictive map generator 212 in more detail. FIG. 4A also illustrates information flow among the various components shown. The predictive model generator 210 receives a topographic map 332 as an information map 258. Predictive model generator 210 also receive a geographic location 334, or an indication of geographic location, from geographic position sensor 204. In-situ sensors 208 illustratively include one or environmental sensors, such as environmental sensors 336, as well as a processing system 338. In some instances, environmental sensors 336 may be located on board the agricultural harvester 100. The processing system 338 processes sensor data generated from environmental sensors 336 to generate processed data. Prior to continuing the discussion of FIG. 4A, reference will now be drawn to FIG. 4B which is a block diagram showing some examples of environmental sensors 336.


As illustrated in FIG. 4B, environmental characteristic sensors 336 include one or more yield sensors 900, one or more crop moisture sensors 902, one or more soil moisture sensors 904, one or more biomass sensors 906, one or more crop state sensors 908, one or more crop constituents sensors 910, one or more kernel size sensors 912, one or more stalk size sensors 914, one or more ear size sensors 916, one or more standing water sensors 918, one or more obscurants sensors 920, and can include one or more other environmental characteristic sensors 922.


Yield sensors 900 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of yield. Yield sensors 900 may include one or more of: a camera or optical sensor that detects a fill level of the clean grain tank; a camera or optical sensor that detects a flow of clean grain into clean grain tank; mass or load sensors that sense a mass of grain in the clean grain tank; mass flow sensors that sense a flow of clean grain into clean gain tank; as well as a variety of other types of yield sensors. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data (e.g., signals, images, etc.) generated by yield sensors 900 to generate processed data identifying a yield value (or sensor value indicative of yield), as an environmental characteristic value.


Crop moisture sensors 902 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of crop moisture. Crop moisture may be measured for the entire crop material, for only grain, for only material-other-than grain, or for any other portion of the crop. Crop moisture sensors 902 can include, for example, a capacitive moisture sensor, a microwave sensor, or a conductivity sensor. In other examples, crop moisture sensors 902 may include sensors that detect a color of the crop plant, such as the “greenness” or “brownness” (or distribution of green and brown). In other examples, crop moisture sensors 902 may measure properties by utilizing electric fields or electromagnetic waves that interact with water molecules of the crop. Without limitation these properties may include permittivity, resonance, reflection, absorption, or transmission. Crop moisture sensors 902 may be disposed along the flow path of the crop material, such as disposed in the feeder house, on the clean grain elevator, as well as various other locations. In some examples, crop moisture sensors 902 may include a separate measurement cell to which crop material is diverted for sampling. Various other types of crop moisture sensors 902 are contemplated. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by crop moisture sensors 902 to generate processed data identifying a crop moisture value (or sensor value indicative of crop moisture), as an environmental characteristic value.


Soil moisture sensors 904 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of soil moisture. Soil moisture sensors 904 can include, for example, one or more cameras (e.g., forward looking cameras) or optical sensors (e.g., forward looking optical sensors). In one example, soil moisture sensors 904 can include a thermal imager that detects a thermal characteristic of the soil at the field. In other examples, soil moisture sensors 904 may include a probe or other device that contacts the soil, such as a capacitive soil moisture sensor. Various other types of soil moisture sensors 904 are contemplated. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by the soil moisture sensors 904 to generate processed data identifying a soil moisture value (or sensor value indicative of soil moisture), as an environmental characteristic value.


Biomass sensors 906 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of biomass. In some examples, biomass sensors 906 can include a force sensor that senses a force (e.g., fluid pressure, torque, etc.) used to drive threshing rotor 112. In some examples, biomass sensors 906 can include a camera or optical sensor that generates images of the crop plants ahead of agricultural harvester 100. Various other types of biomass sensors 906 are contemplated. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by biomass sensors 906 to generate processed data identifying a biomass value (or sensor value indicative of biomass), as an environmental characteristic value.


Crop state sensors 908 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of crop state. Crop state refers to whether a crop plant is standing, down, partially down, and, if the crop is down or partially down, the magnitude and direction of the downing. Crop state sensors 908 can include a camera (such as forward looking camera) or an optical sensor (such as a forward looking optical sensor) that generates sensor data (e.g., signals, images, etc.) indicative of the crop state of crop. Various other types of crop state sensors 908 are contemplated. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by crop state sensors 908 to generate processed sensor data identifying a crop state value (or sensor value indicative of crop state), as an environmental characteristic value.


Crop constituents sensors 910 illustratively detect an amount (e.g., concentration) of constituents (e.g., starch, protein, oil, etc.) of crop. Crop constituents sensors 910 utilize one or more bands of electromagnetic radiation. For example, a crop constituent sensor 910 can utilize the reflection or absorption of various ranges (e.g., various wavelengths or frequencies, or both) of electromagnetic radiation by crop or other vegetation material in detecting crop constituents. In some examples, crop constituent sensors 910 can include an optical sensor, such as an optical spectrometer. In one example, a crop constituent sensor 910 utilizes near-infrared spectroscopy and near-infrared spectroscopy. Various other types of crop constituents sensors 910 are contemplated. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by crop state sensors 910 to generate processed sensor data identifying a crop constituent value (or sensor value indicative of crop constituents), as an environmental characteristic value.


Kernel size sensors 912 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of size of a kernel (or grain). Kernel size sensors 912 can include one or more cameras (e.g., clean grain camera), optical sensors, capacitive sensors, electromagnetic or ultrasonic time of flight reflective sensors, signal attenuation sensors, weight or mass sensors, material flow sensors, etc. Kernel size sensors 912 can be placed at one or more locations in agricultural harvester 100. Various other types of kernel size sensors 912 are contemplated herein. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by kernel size sensors 912 to generate processed sensor data identifying a kernel size value (or sensor value indicative of crop state), as an environmental characteristic value.


Stalk size sensors 914 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of a size (e.g., diameter) of stalks of crop plants. Stalk size sensors 914 can include one or more cameras (e.g., forward looking camera) or optical sensors (e.g., forward looking optical sensors). In some examples, stalk size sensors 914 can include a moveable member which contacts and is displaced by the stalks. The displacement of the moveable member (or force acting against the moveable member) can be measured to indicate a stalk size. Such measurement may utilize appropriate sensing technology, such as a sensing device utilizing the piezoelectric effect, a potentiometer, or a light barrier encoder. In other examples, the deck plates may be displaced by contact with the crop stalks, the displacement of the deck plates (or force acting against the deck plates) can be measured. Such measurement may utilize appropriate sensing technology, such as a sensing device utilizing the piezoelectric effect, a potentiometer, or a light barrier encoder. Various other types of stalk size sensors 914 are contemplated. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by stalk size sensors 914 to generate processed sensor data identifying a stalk size value (or sensor value indicative of stalk size), as an environmental characteristic value.


Ear size sensors 916 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of a size (e.g., one or more of diameter and length) of ears of crop plants. Ear size sensors 916 can include one or more cameras (e.g., forward looking camera) or optical sensors (e.g., forward looking optical sensors). Various other types of ear size sensors 916 are contemplated. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by ear size sensors 916 to generate processed sensor data identifying an ear size value (or sensor value indicative of ear size), as an environmental characteristic value.


Standing water sensors 918 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of an amount of standing water, that is, an amount of water on the surface of the field. Standing water sensors 918 can include one or more cameras (e.g., forward looking camera) or optical sensors (e.g., forward looking optical sensors). In some examples, standing water sensors 918 may utilize one or more bands of electromagnetic radiation. In one example, standing water sensors 918 may include a thermal camera that detects a thermal characteristic of the field. Various other types of standing water sensors 918 are contemplated. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by standing water sensors 918 to generate processed sensor data identifying a standing water value (or sensor value indicative of standing water), as an environmental characteristic value.


Obscurants sensors 920 illustratively detect a characteristic indicative of an amount of obscurants in the air at the field. Obscurants sensors 920 can include one or more cameras (e.g., forward looking camera) or optical sensors (e.g., forward looking optical sensors. Various other types of obscurants sensors 920 are contemplated. Processing system 338 processes the sensor data generated by obscurants sensors 920 to generate processed sensor data identifying an obscurants value (or sensor value indicative of obscurants), as environmental characteristic value.


It will also be understood that processing system 338 can geolocate the values received from the environmental characteristic sensors 336 (as well as other in-situ sensors) to a location on the field. For example, the location of the agricultural harvester 100 at the time sensor data (e.g., signal, image, etc.) from an environmental characteristic sensor 336 is received is typically not the accurate location of the environmental characteristic. This may be because an amount of time elapses between when the agricultural harvester 100 makes contact with area of the field or the plant on the field and when the environmental characteristic is detected by the environmental sensor 336. As an illustrative example, a yield value derived from sensor data generated by yield sensors 900 may correspond to an area behind the agricultural harvester 100 (relative to its direction of travel). This is because of the time delay between when the crop (to which the yield corresponds) was encountered by the agricultural harvester 100 and when the crop was detected by the yield sensor 900. Thus, this latency (time delay) is taken into account when georeferencing the sensed data. Additionally, the heading and speed of the agricultural harvester 100 can also be taken into account. In other examples, the environmental characteristic value derived from the environmental sensor data may correspond to an area ahead of the agricultural harvester 100. As an illustrative example, an environmental characteristic sensor 336 in the form of a forward looking camera or optical sensor (or other type of sensor sensing ahead of the agricultural harvester 100) may detect environmental characteristics corresponding to a geographic location ahead of the agricultural harvester 100. Thus, the geographic location of the agricultural harvester at the time the environmental characteristic is detected may be behind (relative to the direction of travel of the agricultural harvester 100) the geographic location to which the environmental characteristic corresponds. In such an example, the distance between the environmental characteristic sensor 336 and the geographic location can be derived from the sensor data. These are merely some examples. It will be understood that the values received from the environmental sensors 336 can be geolocated to a location on the field.


It will also be understood that while the various environmental characteristic sensors 336 are listed separately, in other examples, the same sensor may be used to generate sensor data indicative of more than one environmental characteristic, for instance, a camera or optical sensor may generate an image that is indicative of multiple different environmental characteristics.


Various other environmental characteristics sensors 922 that detect various other environmental characteristics may also be used. In some examples, raw or processed data from environmental sensors 336 may be presented to operator 260 via operator interface mechanism 218, or to another user. Operator 260 may be on-board the agricultural harvester 100 or at a remote location.


Discussion will now return to FIG. 4A. As shown in FIG. 4A, the example predictive model generator 210 includes one or more of a topographic characteristic-to-yield model generator 1200, a topographic characteristic-to-crop moisture model generator 1202, a topographic characteristic-to-soil moisture model generator 1204, a topographic characteristic-to-biomass model generator 1206, a topographic characteristic-to-crop state model generator 1208, a topographic characteristic-to-crop constituents model generator 1210, a topographic characteristic-to-kernel size model generator 1212, a topographic characteristic-to-stalk size model generator 1214, a topographic characteristic-to-ear size model generator 1216, a topographic characteristic-to-standing water model generator 1218, a topographic characteristic-to-obscurants model generator 1220, and a topographic characteristic-to-other environmental characteristic model generator 1222. In other examples, the predictive model generator 210 may include additional, fewer, or different components than those shown in the example of FIG. 4A. Consequently, in some examples, the predictive model generator 210 may include other items 1224 as well, which may include other types of predictive model generators to generate other types of environmental characteristic models.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a yield sensor 900. Topographic characteristic-to-yield model generator 1200 identifies a relationship between yield value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the yield value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the yield value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-yield model generator 1200, topographic characteristic-to-yield model generator 1200 generates a predictive yield model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive yield model is used by yield map generator 1400 to predict yield values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a yield value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive yield model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a yield sensor 900. Topographic characteristic-to-yield model generator 1200 identifies a relationship between yield value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the yield value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the yield value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-yield model generator 1200, topographic characteristic-to-yield model generator 1200 generates a predictive yield model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive yield model is used by yield map generator 1400 to predict yield values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a yield value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive yield model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a crop moisture sensor 902. Topographic characteristic-to-crop moisture model generator 1202 identifies a relationship between crop moisture value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the crop moisture value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the crop moisture value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-crop moisture model generator 1202, topographic characteristic-to-crop moisture model generator 1202 generates a predictive crop moisture model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive crop moisture model is used by crop moisture map generator 1402 to predict crop moisture values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a crop moisture value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive crop moisture model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a soil moisture sensor 904. Topographic characteristic-to-soil moisture model generator 1204 identifies a relationship between soil moisture value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the soil moisture value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the crop moisture value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-soil moisture model generator 1204, topographic characteristic-to-soil moisture model generator 1200 generates a predictive soil moisture model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive soil moisture model is used by soil moisture map generator 1404 to predict soil moisture values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a soil moisture value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive soil moisture model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a biomass sensor 906. Topographic characteristic-to-biomass model generator 1206 identifies a relationship between biomass value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the biomass value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the biomass value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-biomass model generator 1206, topographic characteristic-to-biomass model generator 1206 generates a predictive biomass model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive biomass model is used by biomass map generator 1406 to predict biomass values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a biomass value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive biomass model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a crop state sensor 908. Topographic characteristic-to-crop state model generator 1208 identifies a relationship between crop state value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the crop state value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the crop state value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-crop state model generator 1208, topographic characteristic-to-crop state model generator 1208 generates a predictive crop state model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive crop state model is used by crop state map generator 1408 to predict crop state values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a crop state value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive crop state model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a crop constituents sensor 910. Topographic characteristic-to-crop constituents model generator 1210 identifies a relationship between crop constituents value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the crop constituents value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the crop constituents value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-crop constituents model generator 1210, topographic characteristic-to-crop constituents model generator 1210 generates a predictive crop constituents model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive crop constituents model is used by crop constituents map generator 1410 to predict crop constituents values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a crop constituent value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive crop constituents model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a kernel size sensor 912. Topographic characteristic-to-kernel size model generator 1212 identifies a relationship between kernel size value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the kernel size value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the kernel size value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-kernel size model generator 1212, topographic characteristic-to-kernel size model generator 1212 generates a predictive kernel size model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive kernel size model is used by kernel size map generator 1412 to predict kernel size values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a kernel value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive kernel size model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a stalk size sensor 914. Topographic characteristic-to-stalk size model generator 1214 identifies a relationship between stalk size value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the stalk size value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the stalk size value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-stalk size model generator 1214, topographic characteristic-to-stalk size model generator 1214 generates a predictive stalk size model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive stalk size model is used by stalk size map generator 1414 to predict stalk size values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a stalk size value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive stalk size model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is an ear size sensor 916. Topographic characteristic-to-ear size model generator 1216 identifies a relationship between ear size value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the ear size value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the ear size value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-ear size model generator 1216, topographic characteristic-to-ear size model generator 1216 generates a predictive ear size model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive ear size model is used by ear size map generator 1416 to predict ear size values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, an ear size value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive ear size model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is a standing water sensor 918. Topographic characteristic-to-standing water model generator 1218 identifies a relationship between standing water value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the standing water value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the standing water value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-standing water model generator 1218, topographic characteristic-to-standing water model generator 1218 generates a predictive standing water model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive standing water model is used by standing water map generator 1418 to predict standing water values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, a standing water value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive standing water model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is an obscurants sensor 920. Topographic characteristic-to-obscurants model generator 1220 identifies a relationship between obscurants value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the obscurants value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the obscurants value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-obscurants model generator 1220, topographic characteristic-to-obscurants model generator 1220 generates a predictive obscurants model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive obscurants model is used by obscurants map generator 1420 to predict obscurants values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, an obscurant value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive obscurants model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


The present discussion proceeds with respect to an example in which environmental characteristic sensor 336 is an other environmental characteristic sensor 922. Topographic characteristic-to-other environmental characteristic model generator 1222 identifies a relationship between other environmental characteristic value(s) detected in processed sensor data 340, at geographic location(s) to which the other environmental characteristic value(s) correspond, and topographic characteristic value(s) from the topographic map 332 corresponding to the same location(s) in the field where the other environmental characteristic value(s) correspond. Based on this relationship established by topographic characteristic-to-other environmental characteristic model generator 1222, topographic characteristic-to-other environmental characteristic model generator 1222 generates a predictive other environmental characteristic model, as an example of a predictive environmental characteristic model 350. The predictive other environmental characteristic model is used by other environmental characteristic map generator 1422 to predict other environmental characteristic values at different locations in the worksite based upon the georeferenced topographic characteristic value contained in the topographic map 332 at the different locations in the field. Thus, for a given location in the field, an other environmental characteristic value can be predicted at the given location based on the predictive other environmental characteristic model and the topographic characteristic value, from the topographic map 332, at that given location.


In light of the above, the predictive model generator 210 is operable to produce a plurality of predictive environmental characteristic models, such as one or more of the predictive environmental characteristic models generated by model generators 1200, 1202, 1204, 1206, 1208, 1210, 1212, 1214, 1216, 1218, 1220, 1222, and 1224. In another example, two or more of the predictive environmental characteristic models generated by model generators 1200, 1202, 1204, 1206, 1208, 1210, 1212, 1214, 1216, 1218, 1220, 1222, and 1224 may be combined into a single predictive environmental characteristic model that predicts two or more environmental characteristic, such as two or more of yield, crop moisture, soil moisture, biomass, crop state, crop constituents, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, standing water, obscurants, and another environmental characteristic based upon the topographic characteristics at different locations in the field. Any of these environmental characteristic models, or combinations thereof, are represented collectively by environmental characteristic model 350 in FIG. 4A.


The predictive environmental characteristic model 350 is provided to predictive map generator 212. In the example of FIG. 4A, predictive map generator 212 includes a yield map generator 1400, a crop moisture map generator 1402, a soil moisture map generator 1404, a biomass map generator 1406, a crop state map generator 1408, a crop constituents map generator 1410, a kernel size map generator 1412, a stalk size map generator 1414, an ear size map generator 1416, a standing water map generator 1418, an obscurants map generator 1420, and an other environmental characteristic map generator 1422. In other examples, the predictive map generator 212 may include additional, fewer, or different map generators. Thus, in some examples, the predictive map generator 212 may include other items 1424 which may include other types of map generators to generate environmental characteristic maps for other types of environmental characteristics.


Yield map generator 1400 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive yield model), which predicts yield based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive yield map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts yield at different locations in the field.


Crop moisture map generator 1402 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive crop moisture model), which predicts crop moisture based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive crop moisture map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts crop moisture at different locations in the field.


Soil moisture map generator 1404 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive soil moisture model), which predicts soil moisture based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive soil moisture map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts soil moisture at different locations in the field.


Biomass map generator 1406 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive biomass model), which predicts biomass based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive biomass map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts biomass at different locations in the field.


Crop state map generator 1408 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive crop state model), which predicts crop state based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive crop state map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts crop state at different locations in the field.


Crop constituents map generator 1410 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive crop constituents model), which predicts crop constituents based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive crop constituents map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts crop constituents at different locations in the field.


Kernel size map generator 1412 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive kernel size model), which predicts kernel size based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive kernel size map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts kernel size at different locations in the field.


Stalk size map generator 1414 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive stalk size model), which predicts stalk size based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive stalk size map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts stalk size at different locations in the field.


Ear size map generator 1416 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive ear size model), which predicts ear size based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive ear size map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts ear size at different locations in the field.


Standing water map generator 1418 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive standing water model), which predicts standing water based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive standing water map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts standing at different locations in the field.


Obscurants map generator 1420 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive obscurants model), which predicts obscurants based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive obscurants map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts obscurants at different locations in the field.


Other environmental characteristic map generator 1422 receives the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 (e.g., predictive other environmental characteristic model), which predicts an other environmental characteristic based upon topographic characteristics from the topographic map 332, and generates a predictive other environmental characteristic map, as an example of a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, that predicts an other environmental characteristic at different locations in the field.


Predictive map generator 212 outputs one or more functional predictive environmental characteristic maps 360 that are predictive of an environmental characteristic. Each of the functional predictive environmental characteristic maps 360 predicts the respective environmental characteristic at different locations in a field. The functional predictive environmental characteristic maps 360 are examples of a predictive map 264.


It will be understood that, in some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 may include two or more different map layers. Each map layer may represent a different data type, for instance, a functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 that provides two or more of a map layer that provides predictive yield values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a map layer that provides predictive crop moisture values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a map layer that provides predictive soil moisture values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a map layer that provides predictive biomass values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a map layer that provides predictive crop state values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a map layer that provides predictive crop constituents values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a map layer that provides predictive kernel size values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a predictive map layer that provides predictive stalk size values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a map layer that provides predictive ear size values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a map layer that provides predictive standing water values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, a map layer that provides predictive obscurants values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332, and a map layer that provides predictive other environmental characteristic values based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 may include a map layer that provides predictive values of two or more environmental characteristic values (e.g., two or more of yield values, crop moisture values, soil moisture values, biomass values, crop state values, crop constituents values, kernel size values, stalk size values, ear size values, standing water values, obscurants values, and other environmental characteristic values) based on topographic characteristic values from topographic map 332.


Each of the generated functional predictive environmental characteristic maps 360 may be provided to control zone generator 213, control system 214, or both. Control zone generator 213 generates control zones and incorporates those control zones into the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 to produce a respective predictive control zone map 265, that is a respective functional predictive environmental characteristic control zone map 361. One or both of functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 and functional predictive environmental characteristic control zone map may be provided to control system 214, which generates control signals to control one or more of the controllable subsystems 216 based upon the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360, functional predictive environmental characteristic control zone map 361, or both.



FIGS. 5A-5B (collectively referred to herein as FIG. 5) is a flow diagram of an example of operation of predictive model generator 210 and predictive map generator 212 in generating the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 and the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360. At block 1500, predictive model generator 210 and predictive map generator 212 receive a topographic map 332. At block 1501, processing system 338 receives sensor data (e.g., signals, images, etc.) from one or more environmental sensors 336. As discussed above, the one or more environmental sensors 360 can include one or more yield sensors 900, one or more crop moisture sensors 902, one or more soil moisture sensors 904, one or more biomass sensors 906, one or more crop state sensors 908, one or more crop constituent sensors 910, one or more kernel size sensors 912, one or more stalk size sensors 914, one or more ear size sensors 916, one or more standing water sensors 918, one or more obscurants sensors 920, and one or more other types of environmental characteristic sensors 922. The various types of environmental characteristics sensors are shown at blocks 1502, 1504, 1506, 1508, 1510, 1512, 1514, 1516, 1518, 1520, 1522, and 1523.


At block 1524, processing system 338 processes the sensor data (e.g., signals, images, etc.) from the one or more environmental characteristic sensors 366 to generate processed sensor data 340 indicative of one or more environmental characteristics. In some instances, as indicated at block 1526, the environmental characteristic may be yield. In some instances, as indicated at block 1528, the environmental characteristic may be crop moisture. In some instances, as indicated at block 1530, the environmental characteristic may be soil moisture. In some instances, as indicated at block 1532, the environmental characteristic may be biomass. In some instances, as indicated at block 1534, the environmental characteristic may be crop state. In some instances, as indicated at block 1536, the environmental characteristic may be crop constituents. In some instances, as indicated at block 1538, the environmental characteristic may be kernel size. In some instances, as indicated at block 1540, the environmental characteristic may be stalk size. In some instances, as indicated at block 1542, the environmental characteristic may be ear size. In some instances, as indicated at block 1546, the environmental characteristic may be standing water. In some instances, as indicated at block 1548, the environmental characteristic may be obscurants. As indicated by block 1549, there can be other environmental characteristics as well.


At block 1550, predictive model generator 210 also obtains the geographic location corresponding to the sensor data. For instance, the predictive model generator 210 can obtain the geographic position from geographic position sensor 204 and determine, based upon machine delays, machine speed, machine headings, etc., a precise geographic location at the field to which the sensor data corresponds.


At block 1552, predictive model generator 210 generates one or more predictive environmental characteristic models, such as environmental characteristic model 350, that model a relationship between a topographic characteristic obtained from a topographic map 332, and an environmental characteristic being sensed by the in-situ sensor 208 or a related characteristic. For instance, predictive model generator 210 may generate one or more of a predictive yield model, as indicated by block 1554, a predictive crop moisture model, as indicated by block 1556, a predictive soil moisture model, as indicated by block 1558, a predictive biomass model, as indicated by block 1560, a predictive crop state model, as indicated by block 1562, a predictive crop constituents model, as indicated by block 1564, a predictive kernel size model, as indicated by block 1566, a predictive stalk size model, as indicated by block 1568, a predictive ear size model, as indicated by block 1570, a predictive standing water model, as indicated by block 1572, a predictive obscurants model, as indicated by block 1574, or a predictive other environmental characteristic model, as indicated by block 1576. In some examples, the predictive environmental characteristic model 350 may model a relationship between a topographic characteristic obtained from a topographic map 332, and two or more of yield, crop moisture, soil moisture, biomass, crop state, crop constituents, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, standing water, obscurants, and an other environmental characteristic.


At block 1578, the predictive machine model, such as predictive environmental characteristic 350, is provided to predictive map generator 212 which generates one or more functional predictive environmental characteristic maps 360 that map a predicted environmental characteristic based on the topographic map and the predictive environmental characteristic model 350. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive yield map that predicts yield, as indicated by block 1580. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive crop moisture map that predicts crop moisture, as indicated by block 1582. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive soil moisture map that predicts soil moisture, as indicated by block 1584. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive biomass map that predicts biomass, as indicated by block 1586. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive crop state map that predicts crop state, as indicated by block 1588. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive crop constituents map that predicts crop constituents, as indicated by block 1590. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive kernel size map that predicts kernel size, as indicated by block 1592. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive stalk size map that predicts stalk size, as indicated by block 1594. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive ear size map that predicts ear size, as indicated by block 1596. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive standing water map that predicts standing water, as indicated by block 1598. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive obscurants map that predicts obscurants, as indicated by block 1600. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is a functional predictive other environmental characteristic map that predicts an other environmental characteristic, as indicated by block 1602.


Still in other examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 predicts two or more of yield, crop moisture, soil moisture, biomass, crop state, crop constituents, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, standing water, obscurants, and an other environmental characteristic. In some examples, the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 may include two or more map layers, each map layer predicting a different environmental characteristic, such as two or more of a map layer that predicts yield, a map layer that predicts crop moisture, a map layer that predicts soil moisture, a map layer that predicts biomass, a map layer that predicts crop state, a map layer that predicts crop constituents, a map layer that predicts kernel size, a map layer that predicts stalk size, a map layer that predicts ear size, a map layer that predicts standing water, a map layer that predicts obscurants, and a map layer that predicts an other environmental characteristic.


The predictive environmental characteristic map 360 can be generated during the course of an agricultural operation. Thus, as an agricultural harvester is moving through a field performing an agricultural operation, the predictive environmental characteristic map 360 is generated as the agricultural operation is being performed. Additionally, as noted above in FIG. 3, one or more of the predictive model(s) and the functional predictive map(s) may be updated (or generated new), during the agricultural operation, based on further collected sensor data and learning trigger criteria.


At block 1604, predictive map generator 212 outputs the functional predictive environmental characteristic map(s) 360. At block 1606 predictive map generator 212 outputs the one or more functional predictive environmental characteristic maps for presentation and possible interaction by operator 260, or another user, or both. At block 1608, predictive map generator 212 may configure the one or more functional predictive environmental characteristic maps 360 for consumption by control system 214. At block 1610, predictive map generator 212 can also provide the one or more functional predictive environmental characteristic maps 360 to control zone generator 213 for generation of control zones, to generate one or more functional predictive environmental characteristic control zone maps 361. At block 1612, predictive map generator 212 configures the one or more functional predictive environmental characteristic maps 360 in other ways as well. The functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 or the functional predictive environmental characteristic control zone map 361, or both, are provided to control system 214. At block 1614, control system 214 generates control signals to control the controllable subsystems 216 based upon the functional predictive environmental characteristic map 360 or the functional predictive environmental characteristic control zone map 361.


It can thus be seen that the present system takes an information map that maps a characteristic, such as a topographic characteristic, to different locations in a field. The present system also uses one or more in-situ sensors that sense in-situ sensor data that is indicative of one or more environmental characteristics, such as yield, crop moisture, soil moisture, biomass, crop state, crop constituents, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, standing water, obscurants, and an other environmental characteristic, and generates a predictive model that models a relationship between the one or more environmental characteristics sensed using the one or more in-situ sensors, or one or more related characteristics, and the characteristic mapped in the information map, such as the topographic characteristic. Thus, the present system generates a functional predictive map using a model, in-situ data, and an information map and may configure the generated functional predictive map for consumption by a control system or for presentation to a local or remote operator or other user, or both. For example, the control system may use the functional predictive map to control one or more systems of an agricultural harvester.


The examples herein describe the generation of a predictive model and, in some examples, the generation of a functional predictive map based on the predictive model. The examples described herein are distinguished from other approaches by the use of a model which is at least one of multi-variate or site-specific (i.e., georeferenced, such as map-based). Furthermore, the model is revised as the work machine is performing an operation and while additional in-situ sensor data is collected. The model may also be applied in the future beyond the current worksite. For example, the model may form a baseline (e.g., starting point) for a subsequent operation at a different worksite or the same worksite at a future time.


The revision of the model in response to new data may employ machine learning methods. Without limitation, machine learning methods may include memory networks, Bayes systems, decisions trees, Eigenvectors, Eigenvalues and Machine Learning, Evolutionary and Genetic Algorithms, Cluster Analysis, Expert Systems/Rules, Support Vector Machines, Engines/Symbolic Reasoning, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Graph Analytics and ML, Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, LSTMs and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNSs), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), MCMC, Random Forests, Reinforcement Learning or Reward-based machine learning. Learning may be supervised or unsupervised.


Model implementations may be mathematical, making use of mathematical equations, empirical correlations, statistics, tables, matrices, and the like. Other model implementations may rely more on symbols, knowledge bases, and logic such as rule-based systems. Some implementations are hybrid, utilizing both mathematics and logic. Some models may incorporate random, non-deterministic, or unpredictable elements. Some model implementations may make uses of networks of data values such as neural networks. These are just some examples of models.


The predictive paradigm examples described herein differ from non-predictive approaches where an actuator or other machine parameter is fixed at the time the machine, system, or component is designed, set once before the machine enters the worksite, is reactively adjusted manually based on operator perception, or is reactively adjusted based on a sensor value.


The functional predictive map examples described herein also differ from other map-based approaches. In some examples of these other approaches, an a priori control map is used without any modification based on in-situ sensor data or else a difference determined between data from an in-situ sensor and a predictive map are used to calibrate the in-situ sensor. In some examples of the other approaches, sensor data may be mathematically combined with a priori data to generate control signals, but in a location-agnostic way; that is, an adjustment to an a priori, georeferenced predictive setting is applied independent of the location of the work machine at the worksite. The continued use or end of use of the adjustment, in the other approaches, is not dependent on the work machine being in a particular defined location or region within the worksite.


In examples described herein, the functional predictive maps and predictive actuator control rely on obtained maps and in-situ data that are used to generate predictive models. The predictive models are then revised during the operation to generate revised functional predictive maps and revised actuator control. In some examples, the actuator control is provided based on functional predictive control zone maps which are also revised during the operation at the worksite. In some examples, the revisions (e.g., adjustments, calibrations, etc.) are tied to regions or zones of the worksite rather than to the whole worksite or some non-georeferenced condition. For example, the adjustments are applied to one or more areas of a worksite to which an adjustment is determined to be relevant (e.g., such as by satisfying one or more conditions which may result in application of an adjustment to one or more locations while not applying the adjustment to one or more other locations), as opposed to applying a change in a blanket way to every location in a non-selective way.


In some examples described herein, the models determine and apply those adjustments to selective portions or zones of the worksite based on a set of a priori data, which, in some instances, is multivariate in nature. For example, adjustments may, without limitation, be tied to defined portions of the worksite based on site-specific factors such as topography, soil type, crop variety, soil moisture, as well as various other factors, alone or in combination. Consequently, the adjustments are applied to the portions of the field in which the site-specific factors satisfy one or more criteria and not to other portions of the field where those site-specific factors do not satisfy the one or more criteria. Thus, in some examples described herein, the model generates a revised functional predictive map for at least the current location or zone, the unworked part of the worksite, or the whole worksite.


As an example, in which the adjustment is applied only to certain areas of the field, consider the following. The system may determine that a detected in-situ characteristic value (e.g., detected environmental characteristic value) varies from a predictive value of the characteristic (e.g., predictive environmental characteristic value), such as by a threshold amount. This deviation may only be detected in areas of the field where the elevation of the worksite is above a certain level. Thus, the revision to the predictive value is only applied to other areas of the worksite having elevation above the certain level. In this simpler example, the predictive environmental characteristic value and elevation at the point the deviation occurred and the detected environmental characteristic value and elevation at the point the deviation crossed the threshold are used to generate a linear equation. The linear equation is used to adjust the predictive environmental characteristic value in unharvested areas of the worksite in the functional predictive map as a function of elevation and the predicted characteristic value. This results in a revised functional predictive map in which some values are adjusted while others remain unchanged based on selected criteria, e.g., elevation as well as threshold deviation. The revised functional map is then used to generate a revised functional control zone map for controlling the machine.


As an example, without limitation, consider an instance of the paradigm described herein which is parameterized as follows.


One or more maps of the field are obtained, such as a topographic map.


In-situ sensors generate sensor data indicative of one or more in-situ environmental characteristic values, such as one or more of in-situ yield values, in-situ crop moisture values, in-situ soil moisture values, in-situ biomass values, in-situ crop state values, in-situ crop constituents values, in-situ kernel size values, in-situ stalk size values, in-situ ear size values, in-situ standing water values, in-situ obscurants values, and in-situ values of an other environmental characteristic.


A predictive model generator generates one or more predictive models based on the one or more obtained maps and the in-situ sensor data, such as a predictive environmental characteristic model.


A predictive map generator generates one or more functional predictive maps based on a model generated by the predictive model generator and the one or more obtained maps. For example, the predictive map generator may generate a functional predictive environmental characteristic map that maps predicted environmental characteristics to one or more locations on the worksite based on a predictive environmental characteristic model and the one or more obtained maps.


Control zones, which include machine settings values, can be incorporated into the functional predictive environmental characteristic map to generate a functional predictive 3D environmental characteristic control zone map.


As the mobile machine continues to operate at the worksite, additional in-situ sensor data is collected. A learning trigger criteria can be detected, such as threshold amount of additional in-situ sensor data being collected, a magnitude of change in a relationship (e.g., the in-situ characteristic values varies to a certain [e.g., threshold] degree from a predictive value of the characteristic), and operator or user makes edits to the predictive map(s) or to a control algorithm, or both, a certain (e.g., threshold) amount of time elapses, as well as various other learning trigger criteria. The predictive model(s) are then revised based on the additional in-situ sensor data and the values from the obtained maps. The functional predictive maps or the functional predictive control zone maps, or both, are then revised based on the revised model(s) and the values in the obtained maps.


The present discussion has mentioned processors and servers. In some examples, the processors and servers include computer processors with associated memory and timing circuitry, not separately shown. They are functional parts of the systems or devices to which they belong and are activated by and facilitate the functionality of the other components or items in those systems.


Also, a number of user interface displays have been discussed. The displays can take a wide variety of different forms and can have a wide variety of different user actuatable operator interface mechanisms disposed thereon. For instance, user actuatable operator interface mechanisms may include text boxes, check boxes, icons, links, drop-down menus, search boxes, etc. The user actuatable operator interface mechanisms can also be actuated in a wide variety of different ways. For instance, they can be actuated using operator interface mechanisms such as a point and click device, such as a track ball or mouse, hardware buttons, switches, a joystick or keyboard, thumb switches or thumb pads, etc., a virtual keyboard or other virtual actuators. In addition, where the screen on which the user actuatable operator interface mechanisms are displayed is a touch sensitive screen, the user actuatable operator interface mechanisms can be actuated using touch gestures. Also, user actuatable operator interface mechanisms can be actuated using speech commands using speech recognition functionality. Speech recognition may be implemented using a speech detection device, such as a microphone, and software that functions to recognize detected speech and execute commands based on the received speech.


A number of data stores have also been discussed. It will be noted the data stores can each be broken into multiple data stores. In some examples, one or more of the data stores may be local to the systems accessing the data stores, one or more of the data stores may all be located remote form a system utilizing the data store, or one or more data stores may be local while others are remote. All of these configurations are contemplated by the present disclosure.


Also, the figures show a number of blocks with functionality ascribed to each block. It will be noted that fewer blocks can be used to illustrate that the functionality ascribed to multiple different blocks is performed by fewer components. Also, more blocks can be used illustrating that the functionality may be distributed among more components. In different examples, some functionality may be added, and some may be removed.


It will be noted that the above discussion has described a variety of different systems, components, logic and interactions. It will be appreciated that any or all of such systems, components, logic and interactions may be implemented by hardware items, such as processors, memory, or other processing components, some of which are described below, that perform the functions associated with those systems, components, logic, or interactions. In addition, any or all of the systems, components, logic and interactions may be implemented by software that is loaded into a memory and is subsequently executed by a processor or server or other computing component, as described below. Any or all of the systems, components, logic and interactions may also be implemented by different combinations of hardware, software, firmware, etc., some examples of which are described below. These are some examples of different structures that may be used to implement any or all of the systems, components, logic and interactions described above. Other structures may be used as well.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an agricultural system 500 which may be similar to agricultural system 200 shown in FIG. 2. Agricultural system 500 includes agricultural harvester 600, which may be similar to agricultural harvester 100 shown in FIG. 2. The agricultural harvester 600 communicates with elements in a remote server architecture 501. In some examples, remote server architecture 501 provides computation, software, data access, and storage services that do not require end-user knowledge of the physical location or configuration of the system that delivers the services. In various examples, remote servers may deliver the services over a wide area network, such as the internet, using appropriate protocols. For instance, remote servers may deliver applications over a wide area network and may be accessible through a web browser or any other computing component. Software or components shown in FIG. 2 as well as data associated therewith, may be stored on servers at a remote location. The computing resources in a remote server environment may be consolidated at a remote data center location, or the computing resources may be dispersed to a plurality of remote data centers. Remote server infrastructures may deliver services through shared data centers, even though the services appear as a single point of access for the user. Thus, the components and functions described herein may be provided from a remote server at a remote location using a remote server architecture. Alternatively, the components and functions may be provided from a server, or the components and functions can be installed on client devices directly, or in other ways.


In the example shown in FIG. 6, some items are similar to those shown in FIG. 2 and those items are similarly numbered. FIG. 6 specifically shows that predictive model generator 210 or predictive map generator 212, or both, may be located at a server location 502 that is remote from the agricultural harvester 600. Therefore, in the example shown in FIG. 6, agricultural harvester 600 accesses systems through remote server location 502.



FIG. 6 also depicts another example of a remote server architecture. FIG. 6 shows that some elements of FIG. 2 may be disposed at a remote server location 502 while others may be located elsewhere. By way of example, data store 202 may be disposed at a location separate from location 502 and accessed via the remote server at location 502. Regardless of where the elements are located, the elements can be accessed directly by agricultural harvester 600 through a network such as a wide area network or a local area network; the elements can be hosted at a remote site by a service; or the elements can be provided as a service or accessed by a connection service that resides in a remote location. Also, data may be stored in any location, and the stored data may be accessed by, or forwarded to, operators, users or systems. For instance, physical carriers may be used instead of, or in addition to, electromagnetic wave carriers. In some examples, where wireless telecommunication service coverage is poor or nonexistent, another machine, such as a fuel truck or other mobile machine or vehicle, may have an automated, semi-automated or manual information collection system. As the agricultural harvester 600 comes close to the machine containing the information collection system, such as a fuel truck prior to fueling, the information collection system collects the information from the agricultural harvester 600 using any type of ad-hoc wireless connection. The collected information may then be forwarded to another network when the machine containing the received information reaches a location where wireless telecommunication service coverage or other wireless coverage is available. For instance, a fuel truck may enter an area having wireless communication coverage when traveling to a location to fuel other machines or when at a main fuel storage location. All of these architectures are contemplated herein. Further, the information may be stored on the agricultural harvester 600 until the agricultural harvester 600 enters an area having wireless communication coverage. The agricultural harvester 600, itself, may send the information to another network.


It will also be noted that the elements of FIG. 2, or portions thereof, may be disposed on a wide variety of different devices. One or more of those devices may include an on-board computer, an electronic control unit, a display unit, a server, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a tablet computer, or other mobile device, such as a palm top computer, a cell phone, a smart phone, a multimedia player, a personal digital assistant, etc.


In some examples, remote server architecture 501 may include cybersecurity measures. Without limitation, these measures may include encryption of data on storage devices, encryption of data sent between network nodes, authentication of people or processes accessing data, as well as the use of ledgers for recording metadata, data, data transfers, data accesses, and data transformations. In some examples, the ledgers may be distributed and immutable (e.g., implemented as blockchain).



FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram of one illustrative example of a handheld or mobile computing device that can be used as a user's or client's hand held device 16, in which the present system (or parts of it) can be deployed. For instance, a mobile device can be deployed in the operator compartment of agricultural harvester 100 for use in generating, processing, or displaying the maps discussed above. FIGS. 8-9 are examples of handheld or mobile devices.



FIG. 7 provides a general block diagram of the components of a client device 16 that can run some components shown in FIG. 2, that interacts with them, or both. In the device 16, a communications link 13 is provided that allows the handheld device to communicate with other computing devices and under some examples provides a channel for receiving information automatically, such as by scanning. Examples of communications link 13 include allowing communication though one or more communication protocols, such as wireless services used to provide cellular access to a network, as well as protocols that provide local wireless connections to networks.


In other examples, applications can be received on a removable Secure Digital (SD) card that is connected to an interface 15. Interface 15 and communication links 13 communicate with a processor 17 (which can also embody processors or servers from other FIGS.) along a bus 19 that is also connected to memory 21 and input/output (I/O) components 23, as well as clock 25 and location system 27.


I/O components 23, in one example, are provided to facilitate input and output operations. I/O components 23 for various examples of the device 16 can include input components such as buttons, touch sensors, optical sensors, microphones, touch screens, proximity sensors, accelerometers, orientation sensors and output components such as a display device, a speaker, and or a printer port. Other I/O components 23 can be used as well.


Clock 25 illustratively comprises a real time clock component that outputs a time and date. It can also, illustratively, provide timing functions for processor 17.


Location system 27 illustratively includes a component that outputs a current geographical location of device 16. This can include, for instance, a global positioning system (GPS) receiver, a LORAN system, a dead reckoning system, a cellular triangulation system, or other positioning system. Location system 27 can also include, for example, mapping software or navigation software that generates desired maps, navigation routes and other geographic functions.


Memory 21 stores operating system 29, network settings 31, applications 33, application configuration settings 35, data store 37, communication drivers 39, and communication configuration settings 41. Memory 21 can include all types of tangible volatile and non-volatile computer-readable memory devices. Memory 21 may also include computer storage media (described below). Memory 21 stores computer readable instructions that, when executed by processor 17, cause the processor to perform computer-implemented steps or functions according to the instructions. Processor 17 may be activated by other components to facilitate their functionality as well.



FIG. 8 shows one example in which device 16 is a tablet computer 700. In FIG. 8, computer 700 is shown with user interface display screen 702. Screen 702 can be a touch screen or a pen-enabled interface that receives inputs from a pen or stylus. Tablet computer 700 may also use an on-screen virtual keyboard. Of course, computer 700 might also be attached to a keyboard or other user input device through a suitable attachment mechanism, such as a wireless link or USB port, for instance. Computer 700 may also illustratively receive voice inputs as well.



FIG. 9 is similar to FIG. 8 except that the device is a smart phone 71. Smart phone 71 has a touch sensitive display 73 that displays icons or tiles or other user input mechanisms 75. Mechanisms 75 can be used by a user to run applications, make calls, perform data transfer operations, etc. In general, smart phone 71 is built on a mobile operating system and offers more advanced computing capability and connectivity than a feature phone.


Note that other forms of the devices 16 are possible.



FIG. 10 is one example of a computing environment in which elements of FIG. 2 can be deployed. With reference to FIG. 10, an example system for implementing some embodiments includes a computing device in the form of a computer 810 programmed to operate as discussed above. Components of computer 810 may include, but are not limited to, a processing unit 820 (which can comprise processors or servers from previous FIGS.), a system memory 830, and a system bus 821 that couples various system components including the system memory to the processing unit 820. The system bus 821 may be any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. Memory and programs described with respect to FIG. 2 can be deployed in corresponding portions of FIG. 10.


Computer 810 typically includes a variety of computer readable media. Computer readable media may be any available media that can be accessed by computer 810 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media is different from, and does not include, a modulated data signal or carrier wave. Computer readable media includes hardware storage media including both volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by computer 810. Communication media may embody computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal.


The system memory 830 includes computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory or both such as read only memory (ROM) 831 and random access memory (RAM) 832. A basic input/output system 833 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 810, such as during start-up, is typically stored in ROM 831. RAM 832 typically contains data or program modules or both that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 820. By way of example, and not limitation, FIG. 10 illustrates operating system 834, application programs 835, other program modules 836, and program data 837.


The computer 810 may also include other removable/non-removable volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. By way of example only, FIG. 10 illustrates a hard disk drive 841 that reads from or writes to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media, an optical disk drive 855, and nonvolatile optical disk 856. The hard disk drive 841 is typically connected to the system bus 821 through a non-removable memory interface such as interface 840, and optical disk drive 855 are typically connected to the system bus 821 by a removable memory interface, such as interface 850.


Alternatively, or in addition, the functionality described herein can be performed, at least in part, by one or more hardware logic components. For example, and without limitation, illustrative types of hardware logic components that can be used include Field-programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), Application-specific Integrated Circuits (e.g., ASICs), Application-specific Standard Products (e.g., ASSPs), System-on-a-chip systems (SOCs), Complex Programmable Logic Devices (CPLDs), etc.


The drives and their associated computer storage media discussed above and illustrated in FIG. 10, provide storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computer 810. In FIG. 10, for example, hard disk drive 841 is illustrated as storing operating system 844, application programs 845, other program modules 846, and program data 847. Note that these components can either be the same as or different from operating system 834, application programs 835, other program modules 836, and program data 837.


A user may enter commands and information into the computer 810 through input devices such as a keyboard 862, a microphone 863, and a pointing device 861, such as a mouse, trackball or touch pad. Other input devices (not shown) may include a joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 820 through a user input interface 860 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interface and bus structures. A visual display 891 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 821 via an interface, such as a video interface 890. In addition to the monitor, computers may also include other peripheral output devices such as speakers 897 and printer 896, which may be connected through an output peripheral interface 895.


The computer 810 is operated in a networked environment using logical connections (such as a controller area network—CAN, local area network—LAN, or wide area network WAN) to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 880.


When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 810 is connected to the LAN 871 through a network interface or adapter 870. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 810 typically includes a modem 872 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 873, such as the Internet. In a networked environment, program modules may be stored in a remote memory storage device. FIG. 10 illustrates, for example, that remote application programs 885 can reside on remote computer 880.


It should also be noted that the different examples described herein can be combined in different ways. That is, parts of one or more examples can be combined with parts of one or more other examples. All of this is contemplated herein.


Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. An agricultural system comprising: a communication system that receives a topographic map that maps values of a topographic characteristic to different geographic locations in the field;a geographic position sensor that detects a geographic location of the agricultural work machine;an in-situ sensor that detects a value of an environmental characteristic corresponding to the geographic location;a predictive model generator that generates a predictive environmental characteristic model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and the environmental characteristic based on the value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map corresponding to the geographic location and the value of the environmental characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location; anda predictive map generator that generates a functional predictive environmental characteristic map of the field that maps predictive values of the environmental characteristic to the different geographic locations in the field based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map and based on the predictive environmental characteristic model.
  • 2. The agricultural system of claim 1, wherein the predictive map generator configures the functional predictive environmental characteristic map for consumption by a control system that generates control signals to control a controllable subsystem on the agricultural work machine based on the functional predictive environmental characteristic map.
  • 3. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a yield value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive yield model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and yield based on the yield value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive yield map that maps predictive yield values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive yield model.
  • 4. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a crop moisture value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive crop moisture model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and crop moisture based on the crop moisture value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive crop moisture map that maps predictive crop moisture values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive crop moisture model.
  • 5. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a soil moisture value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive soil moisture model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and soil moisture based on the soil moisture value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive soil moisture map that maps predictive soil moisture values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive soil moisture model.
  • 6. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a biomass value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive biomass model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and biomass based on the biomass value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive biomass map that maps predictive biomass values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive biomass model.
  • 7. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a crop state value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive crop state model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and crop state based on the crop state value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive crop state map that maps predictive crop state values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive crop state model.
  • 8. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a crop constituent value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive crop constituent model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and a crop constituent based on the crop constituent value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive crop constituent map that maps predictive crop constituent values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive crop constituent model.
  • 9. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a kernel size value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive kernel size model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and kernel size based on the kernel size value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive kernel size map that maps predictive kernel size values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive kernel size model.
  • 10. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a stalk size value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive stalk size model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and stalk size based on the stalk size value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive stalk size map that maps predictive stalk size values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive stalk size model.
  • 11. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, an ear size value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive ear size model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and ear size based on the ear size value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive ear size map that maps predictive ear size values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive ear size model.
  • 12. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, a standing water value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive standing water model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and standing water based on the standing water value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive standing water map that maps predictive standing water values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive standing water model.
  • 13. The agricultural system of claim 2, wherein the in-situ sensor detects, as the value of the environmental characteristic, an obscurants value, wherein the predictive model generates as the predictive environmental characteristic model, a predictive obscurants model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and obscurants based on the obscurants value detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location, andwherein the predictive map generator generates, as the functional predictive environmental characteristic map, a functional predictive obscurants map that maps predictive obscurants values to the different geographic locations in the worksite based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive obscurants model.
  • 14. The agricultural system of claim 1, wherein the predictive map generator outputs the functional predictive environmental characteristic map for presentation to an operator of the agricultural work machine.
  • 15. A computer implemented method of generating a functional predictive environmental characteristic map, comprising: receiving a topographic map that maps values of a topographic characteristic to different geographic locations in a field;obtaining in-situ sensor data indicative of a value of an environmental characteristic corresponding to a geographic location at the field;generating a predictive environmental characteristic model indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and the environmental characteristic; andcontrolling a predictive map generator to generate the functional predictive environmental characteristic map of the field, that maps predictive values of the environmental characteristic to the different locations in the field based on the values of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map and the predictive environmental characteristic model.
  • 16. The computer implemented method of claim 15 and further comprising: configuring the functional predictive environmental characteristic map for a control system that generates control signals to control a controllable subsystem on an agricultural work machine based on the functional predictive environmental characteristic map.
  • 17. The computer implemented method of claim 15 and further comprising: controlling a controllable subsystem of an agricultural work machine based on the functional predictive environmental characteristic map.
  • 18. The computer implemented method of claim 15, wherein obtaining in-situ sensor data indicative of the value of an environmental characteristic comprises obtaining in-situ sensor data indicative of two or more of a value of yield, a value of crop moisture, a value of soil moisture, a value of biomass, a value of crop state, a value of a crop constituent, a value of kernel size, a value of stalk size, a value of ear size, a value of standing water, and a value of obscurants.
  • 19. The computer implemented method of claim 18, wherein generating the predictive environmental characteristic model is indicative of a relationship between the topographic characteristic and two or more of yield, crop moisture, soil moisture, biomass, crop state, the crop constituent, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, standing water, and obscurants, and wherein the functional predictive environmental map of the field maps predictive values of two or more of yield, crop moisture, soil moisture, biomass, crop state, the crop constituent, kernel size, stalk size, ear size, standing water, and obscurants.
  • 20. An agricultural work machine, comprising: a communication system that receives a topographic map that maps values of a topographic characteristic to different geographic locations in a field;a geographic position sensor that detects a geographic location of the agricultural work machine;an in-situ sensor that detects a value of an environmental characteristic corresponding to a geographic location;a predictive model generator that generates a predictive environmental characteristic model indicative of a relationship between values of the topographic characteristic and values of the environmental characteristic based on the value of the environmental characteristic detected by the in-situ sensor corresponding to the geographic location and a value of the topographic characteristic in the topographic map at the geographic location;a predictive map generator that generates a functional predictive environmental characteristic map of the field, that maps predictive values of the environmental characteristic to the different locations in the field, based on the topographic values in the topographic map at those different locations and based on the predictive environmental characteristic model; anda control system that generates a control system based on the functional predictive environmental characteristic map and based on the geographic location of the agricultural work machine.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/066,442, filed on Oct. 8, 2020, which is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/783,475, filed Feb. 6, 2020, Ser. No. 16/783,511, filed Feb. 6, 2020, Ser. No. 16/380,531, filed Apr. 10, 2019, and Ser. No. 16/171,978, filed Oct. 26, 2018 the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (779)
Number Name Date Kind
3568157 Downing et al. Mar 1971 A
3580257 Teague May 1971 A
3599543 Norman Aug 1971 A
3775019 Natsuume Nov 1973 A
3856754 Habermeier et al. Dec 1974 A
4129573 Bellus et al. Dec 1978 A
4166735 Pilgram et al. Sep 1979 A
4183742 Beck et al. Jan 1980 A
4268679 Lavanish May 1981 A
4349377 Duerr et al. Sep 1982 A
4360677 Doweyko et al. Nov 1982 A
4435203 Funaki et al. Mar 1984 A
4493726 Burdeska et al. Jan 1985 A
4527241 Sheehan et al. Jul 1985 A
4566901 Martin et al. Jan 1986 A
4584013 Brunner Apr 1986 A
4687505 Sylling et al. Aug 1987 A
4857101 Musco et al. Aug 1989 A
4911751 Nyffeler et al. Mar 1990 A
5059154 Reyenga Oct 1991 A
5089043 Hayase et al. Feb 1992 A
5246164 McCann et al. Sep 1993 A
5246915 Lutz et al. Sep 1993 A
5250690 Turner et al. Oct 1993 A
5296702 Beck et al. Mar 1994 A
5300477 Tice Apr 1994 A
5416061 Hewett et al. May 1995 A
5477459 Clegg et al. Dec 1995 A
5488817 Paquet et al. Feb 1996 A
5563112 Barnes, III Oct 1996 A
5585626 Beck et al. Dec 1996 A
5586033 Hall Dec 1996 A
5592606 Myers Jan 1997 A
5606821 Sadjadi et al. Mar 1997 A
5666793 Bottinger Sep 1997 A
5712782 Weigelt et al. Jan 1998 A
5721679 Monson Feb 1998 A
5767373 Ward et al. Jun 1998 A
5771169 Wendte Jun 1998 A
5789741 Kinter et al. Aug 1998 A
5809440 Beck et al. Sep 1998 A
5841282 Christy et al. Nov 1998 A
5849665 Gut et al. Dec 1998 A
5878821 Flenker et al. Mar 1999 A
5899950 Milender et al. May 1999 A
5902343 Hale et al. May 1999 A
5915492 Yates et al. Jun 1999 A
5957304 Dawson Sep 1999 A
5974348 Rocks Oct 1999 A
5978723 Hale et al. Nov 1999 A
5991687 Hale et al. Nov 1999 A
5991694 Gudat et al. Nov 1999 A
5995859 Takahashi Nov 1999 A
5995894 Wendte Nov 1999 A
5995895 Watt et al. Nov 1999 A
6004076 Cook et al. Dec 1999 A
6016713 Hale Jan 2000 A
6029106 Hale et al. Feb 2000 A
6041582 Tiede et al. Mar 2000 A
6073070 Diekhans Jun 2000 A
6073428 Diekhans Jun 2000 A
6085135 Steckel Jul 2000 A
6119442 Hale Sep 2000 A
6119531 Wendte et al. Sep 2000 A
6128574 Diekhans Oct 2000 A
6141614 Janzen et al. Oct 2000 A
6178253 Hendrickson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185990 Missotten et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188942 Corcoran et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199000 Keller et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204856 Wood et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205381 Motz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205384 Diekhans Mar 2001 B1
6216071 Motz Apr 2001 B1
6236924 Motz et al. May 2001 B1
6272819 Wendte et al. Aug 2001 B1
6327569 Reep Dec 2001 B1
6374173 Ehlbeck Apr 2002 B1
6380745 Anderson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6431790 Anderegg et al. Aug 2002 B1
6451733 Pidskalny et al. Sep 2002 B1
6505146 Blackmer Jan 2003 B1
6505998 Bullivant Jan 2003 B1
6539102 Anderson et al. Mar 2003 B1
6549849 Lange et al. Apr 2003 B2
6584390 Beck Jun 2003 B2
6591145 Hoskinson et al. Jul 2003 B1
6591591 Coers et al. Jul 2003 B2
6592453 Coers et al. Jul 2003 B2
6604432 Hamblen et al. Aug 2003 B1
6681551 Sheidler et al. Jan 2004 B1
6682416 Behnke et al. Jan 2004 B2
6687616 Peterson et al. Feb 2004 B1
6729189 Paakkinen May 2004 B2
6735568 Buckwalter et al. May 2004 B1
6834550 Upadhyaya et al. Dec 2004 B2
6838564 Edmunds et al. Jan 2005 B2
6846128 Sick Jan 2005 B2
6932554 Isfort et al. Aug 2005 B2
6999877 Dyer et al. Feb 2006 B1
7073374 Berkman Jul 2006 B2
7167797 Faivre et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167800 Faivre et al. Jan 2007 B2
7184892 Dyer et al. Feb 2007 B1
7191062 Chi et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194965 Hickey et al. Mar 2007 B2
7211994 Mergen et al. May 2007 B1
7248968 Reid Jul 2007 B2
7255016 Burton Aug 2007 B2
7261632 Pirro et al. Aug 2007 B2
7302837 Wendte Dec 2007 B2
7308326 Maertens et al. Dec 2007 B2
7313478 Anderson et al. Dec 2007 B1
7318010 Anderson Jan 2008 B2
7347168 Reckels et al. Mar 2008 B2
7408145 Holland Aug 2008 B2
7480564 Metzler et al. Jan 2009 B2
7483791 Anderegg et al. Jan 2009 B2
7537519 Huster et al. May 2009 B2
7540129 Kormann Jun 2009 B2
7557066 Hills et al. Jul 2009 B2
7628059 Scherbring Dec 2009 B1
7687435 Witschel et al. Mar 2010 B2
7703036 Satterfield et al. Apr 2010 B2
7725233 Hendrickson et al. May 2010 B2
7733416 Gal Jun 2010 B2
7756624 Diekhans et al. Jul 2010 B2
7798894 Isfort Sep 2010 B2
7827042 Jung et al. Nov 2010 B2
7915200 Epp et al. Mar 2011 B2
7945364 Schricker et al. May 2011 B2
7993188 Ritter Aug 2011 B2
8024074 Stelford et al. Sep 2011 B2
8060283 Mott et al. Nov 2011 B2
8107681 Gaal Jan 2012 B2
8145393 Foster et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147176 Coers et al. Apr 2012 B2
8152610 Harrington Apr 2012 B2
8190335 Vik et al. May 2012 B2
8195342 Anderson Jun 2012 B2
8195358 Anderson Jun 2012 B2
8213964 Fitzner et al. Jul 2012 B2
8224500 Anderson Jul 2012 B2
8252723 Jakobi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8254351 Fitzner et al. Aug 2012 B2
8321365 Anderson Nov 2012 B2
8329717 Minn et al. Dec 2012 B2
8332105 Laux Dec 2012 B2
8338332 Hacker et al. Dec 2012 B1
8340862 Baumgarten et al. Dec 2012 B2
8407157 Anderson Mar 2013 B2
8428829 Brunnert et al. Apr 2013 B2
8478493 Anderson Jul 2013 B2
8488865 Hausmann et al. Jul 2013 B2
8494727 Green et al. Jul 2013 B2
8527157 Imhof et al. Sep 2013 B2
8544397 Bassett Oct 2013 B2
8577561 Green et al. Nov 2013 B2
8606454 Wang et al. Dec 2013 B2
8626406 Schleicher et al. Jan 2014 B2
8635903 Hanson et al. Jan 2014 B2
8649940 Bonefas Feb 2014 B2
8656693 Madsen et al. Feb 2014 B2
8662972 Behnke et al. Mar 2014 B2
8671760 Wallrath et al. Mar 2014 B2
8677724 Chaney et al. Mar 2014 B2
8738238 Rekow May 2014 B2
8738244 Lenz May 2014 B2
8755976 Peters et al. Jun 2014 B2
8781692 Kormann Jul 2014 B2
8789563 Wenzel Jul 2014 B2
8814640 Behnke et al. Aug 2014 B2
8843269 Anderson et al. Sep 2014 B2
8868304 Bonefas Oct 2014 B2
8909389 Meyer Dec 2014 B2
D721740 Schmaltz et al. Jan 2015 S
8942860 Morselli Jan 2015 B2
8962523 Rosinger et al. Feb 2015 B2
9002591 Wang et al. Apr 2015 B2
9008918 Missotten et al. Apr 2015 B2
9009087 Mewes et al. Apr 2015 B1
9011222 Johnson et al. Apr 2015 B2
9014901 Wang et al. Apr 2015 B2
9043096 Zielke et al. May 2015 B2
9043129 Bonefas et al. May 2015 B2
9066465 Hendrickson et al. Jun 2015 B2
9072227 Wenzel Jul 2015 B2
9095090 Casper et al. Aug 2015 B2
9098386 Boydell Aug 2015 B1
9119342 Bonefas Sep 2015 B2
9127428 Meier Sep 2015 B2
9131644 Osborne Sep 2015 B2
9152938 Lang et al. Oct 2015 B2
9173339 Sauder et al. Nov 2015 B2
9179599 Bischoff Nov 2015 B2
9188518 Snyder et al. Nov 2015 B2
9188986 Baumann Nov 2015 B2
9226449 Bischoff Jan 2016 B2
9234317 Chi Jan 2016 B2
9235214 Anderson Jan 2016 B2
9301447 Kormann Apr 2016 B2
9301466 Kelly Apr 2016 B2
9313951 Herman et al. Apr 2016 B2
9326443 Zametzer et al. May 2016 B2
9326444 Bonefas May 2016 B2
9392746 Darr et al. Jul 2016 B2
9405039 Anderson Aug 2016 B2
9410840 Acheson et al. Aug 2016 B2
9439342 Pasquier Sep 2016 B2
9457971 Bonefas et al. Oct 2016 B2
9463939 Bonefas et al. Oct 2016 B2
9485905 Jung et al. Nov 2016 B2
9489576 Johnson et al. Nov 2016 B2
9497898 Dillon Nov 2016 B2
9510508 Jung Dec 2016 B2
9511633 Anderson et al. Dec 2016 B2
9511958 Bonefas Dec 2016 B2
9516812 Baumgarten et al. Dec 2016 B2
9521805 Muench et al. Dec 2016 B2
9522791 Bonefas et al. Dec 2016 B2
9522792 Bonefas et al. Dec 2016 B2
9523180 Deines Dec 2016 B2
9529364 Foster et al. Dec 2016 B2
9532504 Herman et al. Jan 2017 B2
9538714 Anderson Jan 2017 B2
9563492 Bell et al. Feb 2017 B2
9563848 Hunt Feb 2017 B1
9563852 Wiles et al. Feb 2017 B1
9578808 Dybro et al. Feb 2017 B2
9629308 Schøler et al. Apr 2017 B2
9631964 Gelinske et al. Apr 2017 B2
9642305 Nykamp et al. May 2017 B2
9648807 Escher et al. May 2017 B2
9675008 Rusciolelli et al. Jun 2017 B1
9681605 Noonan et al. Jun 2017 B2
9694712 Healy Jul 2017 B2
9696162 Anderson Jul 2017 B2
9699967 Palla et al. Jul 2017 B2
9714856 Myers Jul 2017 B2
9717178 Sauder et al. Aug 2017 B1
9721181 Guan et al. Aug 2017 B2
9723790 Berry et al. Aug 2017 B2
9740208 Sugumaran et al. Aug 2017 B2
9767521 Stuber et al. Sep 2017 B2
9807934 Rusciolelli et al. Nov 2017 B2
9807940 Roell et al. Nov 2017 B2
9810679 Kimmel Nov 2017 B2
9829364 Wilson et al. Nov 2017 B2
9848528 Werner et al. Dec 2017 B2
9856609 Dehmel Jan 2018 B2
9856612 Oetken Jan 2018 B2
9861040 Bonefas Jan 2018 B2
9872433 Acheson et al. Jan 2018 B2
9903077 Rio Feb 2018 B2
9903979 Dybro et al. Feb 2018 B2
9904963 Rupp et al. Feb 2018 B2
9915952 Dollinger et al. Mar 2018 B2
9922405 Sauder et al. Mar 2018 B2
9924636 Lisouski et al. Mar 2018 B2
9928584 Jens et al. Mar 2018 B2
9933787 Story Apr 2018 B2
9974226 Rupp et al. May 2018 B2
9982397 Korb et al. May 2018 B2
9984455 Fox et al. May 2018 B1
9992931 Bonefas et al. Jun 2018 B2
9992932 Bonefas et al. Jun 2018 B2
10004176 Mayerle Jun 2018 B2
10015928 Nykamp et al. Jul 2018 B2
10019018 Hulin Jul 2018 B2
10019790 Bonefas et al. Jul 2018 B2
10025983 Guan et al. Jul 2018 B2
10028435 Anderson et al. Jul 2018 B2
10028451 Rowan et al. Jul 2018 B2
10034427 Krause et al. Jul 2018 B2
10039231 Anderson et al. Aug 2018 B2
10064331 Bradley Sep 2018 B2
10064335 Byttebier et al. Sep 2018 B2
10078890 Tagestad et al. Sep 2018 B1
10085372 Noyer et al. Oct 2018 B2
10091925 Aharoni et al. Oct 2018 B2
10126153 Bischoff et al. Nov 2018 B2
10129528 Bonefas et al. Nov 2018 B2
10143132 Inoue et al. Dec 2018 B2
10152035 Reid et al. Dec 2018 B2
10154624 Guan et al. Dec 2018 B2
10165725 Sugumaran et al. Jan 2019 B2
10178823 Kovach et al. Jan 2019 B2
10183667 Anderson et al. Jan 2019 B2
10188037 Bruns et al. Jan 2019 B2
10201121 Wilson Feb 2019 B1
10209179 Hollstein Feb 2019 B2
10231371 Dillon Mar 2019 B2
10254147 Vermue et al. Apr 2019 B2
10254765 Rekow Apr 2019 B2
10255670 Wu et al. Apr 2019 B1
10275550 Lee Apr 2019 B2
10295703 Dybro et al. May 2019 B2
10310455 Blank et al. Jun 2019 B2
10314232 Isaac et al. Jun 2019 B2
10315655 Blank et al. Jun 2019 B2
10317272 Bhavsar et al. Jun 2019 B2
10351364 Green et al. Jul 2019 B2
10368488 Becker et al. Aug 2019 B2
10398084 Ray et al. Sep 2019 B2
10408545 Blank et al. Sep 2019 B2
10412889 Palla et al. Sep 2019 B2
10426086 Van de Wege et al. Oct 2019 B2
10437243 Blank et al. Oct 2019 B2
10462603 Tippery et al. Oct 2019 B1
10477756 Richt et al. Nov 2019 B1
10485178 Mayerle Nov 2019 B2
10521526 Haaland et al. Dec 2019 B2
10537061 Farley et al. Jan 2020 B2
10568316 Gall et al. Feb 2020 B2
10631462 Bonefas Apr 2020 B2
10677637 Von Muenster Jun 2020 B1
10681872 Viaene et al. Jun 2020 B2
10703277 Schroeder Jul 2020 B1
10729067 Hammer et al. Aug 2020 B2
10740703 Story Aug 2020 B2
10745868 Laugwitz Aug 2020 B2
10760946 Meier et al. Sep 2020 B2
10809118 Von Muenster Oct 2020 B1
10830634 Blank et al. Nov 2020 B2
10866109 Madsen et al. Dec 2020 B2
10890922 Ramm Jan 2021 B2
10909368 Guo Feb 2021 B2
10912249 Wilson Feb 2021 B1
11079725 Palla et al. Aug 2021 B2
11252485 Celicourt Feb 2022 B2
11850553 Palla et al. May 2023 B2
20020011061 Lucand et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020083695 Behnke et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091458 Moore Jul 2002 A1
20020099471 Benneweis Jul 2002 A1
20020133309 Hardt Sep 2002 A1
20020173893 Blackmore et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020193928 Beck Dec 2002 A1
20020193929 Beck Dec 2002 A1
20020198654 Lange et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004630 Beck Jan 2003 A1
20030014171 Ma et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030015351 Goldman et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030024450 Juptner Feb 2003 A1
20030060245 Coers et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069680 Cohen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030075145 Sheidler et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030174207 Alexia et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182144 Pickett et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187560 Keller et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030216158 Bischoff Nov 2003 A1
20030229432 Ho et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229433 van den Berg et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229435 Van der Lely Dec 2003 A1
20040004544 William Knutson Jan 2004 A1
20040054457 Kormann Mar 2004 A1
20040073468 Vyas et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040141641 McDonald et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040193348 Gray et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050059445 Niermann et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050066738 Moore Mar 2005 A1
20050149235 Seal et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050150202 Quick Jul 2005 A1
20050197175 Anderson Sep 2005 A1
20050241285 Maertens et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050283314 Hall Dec 2005 A1
20050284119 Brunnert Dec 2005 A1
20060014489 Fitzner et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060014643 Hacker et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060047377 Ferguson et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058896 Pokorny et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074560 Dyer et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060155449 Dammann Jul 2006 A1
20060162631 Hickey et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060196158 Faivre et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060200334 Faivre et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070005209 Fitzner et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021948 Anderson Jan 2007 A1
20070056258 Behnke Mar 2007 A1
20070068238 Wendte Mar 2007 A1
20070073700 Wippersteg et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070089390 Hendrickson et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070135190 Diekhans et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070185749 Anderson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070199903 Denny Aug 2007 A1
20070208510 Anderson et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233348 Diekhans et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233374 Diekhans et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239337 Anderson Oct 2007 A1
20070282523 Diekhans et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070298744 Fitzner et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080030320 Wilcox et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080098035 Wippersteg et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080140431 Anderson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080177449 Pickett et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080248843 Birrell et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080268927 Farley et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269052 Rosinger et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080289308 Brubaker Nov 2008 A1
20080312085 Kordes et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090044505 Huster et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090074243 Missotten et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090143941 Tarasinski et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090192654 Wendte et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090216410 Allen et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090226036 Gaal Sep 2009 A1
20090259483 Hendrickson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090265098 Dix Oct 2009 A1
20090306835 Ellermann et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090311084 Coers et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090312919 Foster et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090312920 Boenig et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090325658 Phelan et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100036696 Lang et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042297 Foster et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100063626 Anderson Mar 2010 A1
20100063648 Anderson Mar 2010 A1
20100063651 Anderson Mar 2010 A1
20100063664 Anderson Mar 2010 A1
20100063954 Anderson Mar 2010 A1
20100070145 Foster et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100071329 Hindryckx et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100094481 Anderson Apr 2010 A1
20100121541 Behnke et al. May 2010 A1
20100137373 Hungenberg et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145572 Steckel et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100152270 Suty-Heinze et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100152943 Matthews Jun 2010 A1
20100217474 Baumgarten et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100268562 Anderson Oct 2010 A1
20100268679 Anderson Oct 2010 A1
20100285964 Waldraff et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100317517 Rosinger et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100319941 Peterson Dec 2010 A1
20100332051 Kormann Dec 2010 A1
20110056178 Sauerwein et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110059782 Harrington Mar 2011 A1
20110072773 Schroeder et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110084851 Peterson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110086684 Luellen et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110160961 Wollenhaupt et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110213531 Farley et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224873 Reeve et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110227745 Kikuchi et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110257850 Reeve et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270494 Imhof et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110270495 Knapp Nov 2011 A1
20110295460 Hunt et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110307149 Pighi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120004813 Baumgarten et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029732 Meyer Feb 2012 A1
20120087771 Wenzel Apr 2012 A1
20120096827 Chaney et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120143642 O'Neil Jun 2012 A1
20120215378 Sprock et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215379 Sprock et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120253611 Zielke et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120263560 Diekhans et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265412 Diekhans et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271489 Roberts et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120323452 Green et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130019580 Anderson et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130022430 Anderson et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130046419 Anderson et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130046439 Anderson et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130046525 Ali et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130103269 Meyer Zu Hellgen et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130124239 Rosa et al. May 2013 A1
20130126399 Wolff May 2013 A1
20130184944 Missotten et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130185104 Klavins Jul 2013 A1
20130197767 Lenz Aug 2013 A1
20130205733 Peters et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130210505 Bischoff Aug 2013 A1
20130231823 Wang et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130319941 Schneider Dec 2013 A1
20130325242 Cavender-Bares et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332003 Murray et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140002489 Sauder et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140019017 Wilken et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140021598 Sutardja Jan 2014 A1
20140050364 Brueckner et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140067745 Avey Mar 2014 A1
20140121882 Gilmore et al. May 2014 A1
20140129048 Baumgarten et al. May 2014 A1
20140172222 Nickel Jun 2014 A1
20140172224 Matthews et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172225 Matthews et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140208870 Quaderer et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140215984 Bischoff Aug 2014 A1
20140230391 Hendrickson et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140230392 Dybro et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236381 Anderson et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236431 Hendrickson et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140257911 Anderson Sep 2014 A1
20140262547 Acheson et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277960 Blank et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140297242 Sauder et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303814 Burema et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140324272 Madsen et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140331631 Sauder et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140338298 Jung et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140350802 Biggerstaff et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140360148 Wienker et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140379228 Batcheller et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150049088 Snyder et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150088785 Chi Mar 2015 A1
20150095830 Massoumi et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150101519 Blackwell et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150105984 Birrell et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150124054 Darr et al. May 2015 A1
20150168187 Myers Jun 2015 A1
20150211199 Corcoran et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150230403 Jung et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150240939 Ge Aug 2015 A1
20150242799 Seki et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150243114 Tanabe et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150254800 Johnson et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150264863 Muench et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150276794 Pistrol et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150278640 Johnson et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150285647 Meyer zu Helligen et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150293029 Acheson et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150302305 Rupp et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150305238 Klausmann et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150305239 Jung Oct 2015 A1
20150327440 Dybro et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150351320 Takahara et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150370935 Starr Dec 2015 A1
20150373902 Pasquier Dec 2015 A1
20150373913 Berry et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150379785 Brown, Jr. et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160025531 Bischoff et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160029558 Dybro et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160052525 Tuncer et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160057922 Freiberg et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160066505 Bakke et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160073573 Ethington et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160078375 Ethington et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160078391 Blank et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160078570 Ethington et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160088794 Baumgarten et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160106038 Boyd et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160084813 Anderson et al. May 2016 A1
20160146611 Matthews et al. May 2016 A1
20160147962 Vollmar et al. May 2016 A1
20160202227 Mathur et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160203657 Bell et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160205918 Chan et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160212939 Ouchida et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160215994 Mewes et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160232621 Ethington et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160247075 Mewes et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160247082 Stehling Aug 2016 A1
20160260021 Marek Sep 2016 A1
20160285416 Tiwari et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160286720 Heitmann et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160286721 Heitmann et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160286722 Heitmann et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160309656 Wilken et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160327535 Cotton et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160330906 Acheson et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160338267 Anderson et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160342915 Humphrey Nov 2016 A1
20160345485 Acheson et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160360697 Diaz Dec 2016 A1
20170013773 Kirk et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170031365 Sugumaran et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170034997 Mayerle Feb 2017 A1
20170049045 Wilken et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170055433 Jamison Mar 2017 A1
20170082442 Anderson Mar 2017 A1
20170083024 Reijersen Van Buuren Mar 2017 A1
20170086381 Roell et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170089741 Takahashi et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170089742 Bruns et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170090068 Xiang et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170105331 Herlitzius et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170105335 Xu et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170112049 Weisberg et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170112061 Meyer Apr 2017 A1
20170115862 Stratton et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170118915 Middelberg et al. May 2017 A1
20170124463 Chen et al. May 2017 A1
20170127606 Horton May 2017 A1
20170160916 Baumgarten et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170161627 Xu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170185086 Sauder et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170188515 Baumgarten et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170192431 Foster et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170208742 Ingibergsson et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170213141 Xu et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170215330 Missotten et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170223947 Gall et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170227969 Murray et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170235471 Scholer et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170245434 Jung et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170251600 Anderson et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170270446 Starr et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170270616 Basso Sep 2017 A1
20170316692 Rusciolelli et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170318743 Sauder et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170322550 Yokoyama Nov 2017 A1
20170332551 Todd et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170336787 Pichlmaier et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170370765 Meier et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180000011 Schleusner et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180014452 Starr Jan 2018 A1
20180022559 Knutson Jan 2018 A1
20180024549 Hurd Jan 2018 A1
20180035622 Gresch et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180054955 Oliver Mar 2018 A1
20180060975 Hassanzadeh Mar 2018 A1
20180070534 Mayerle Mar 2018 A1
20180077865 Gallmeier Mar 2018 A1
20180084709 Wieckhorst et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180084722 Wieckhorst Mar 2018 A1
20180092301 Vandike et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180092302 Vandike et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180108123 Baurer et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180120133 Blank et al. May 2018 A1
20180121821 Parsons et al. May 2018 A1
20180124992 Koch et al. May 2018 A1
20180128933 Koch et al. May 2018 A1
20180129879 Achtelik et al. May 2018 A1
20180132422 Hassanzadeh et al. May 2018 A1
20180136664 Tomita et al. May 2018 A1
20180146612 Sauder et al. May 2018 A1
20180146624 Chen et al. May 2018 A1
20180153084 Calleija et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180177125 Takahara et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180177136 Reimann et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180181893 Basso Jun 2018 A1
20180196438 Newlin et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180196441 Muench et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180211156 Guan et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180232674 Bilde Aug 2018 A1
20180242523 Kirchbeck et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180249641 Lewis et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180257657 Blank et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180271015 Redden et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180279599 Struve Oct 2018 A1
20180295771 Peters Oct 2018 A1
20180310474 Posselius et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180317381 Bassett Nov 2018 A1
20180317385 Wellensiek et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180325012 Ferrari et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180325014 Debbaut Nov 2018 A1
20180325015 Wolters et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180332767 Muench et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180338422 Brubaker Nov 2018 A1
20180340845 Rhodes et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180359917 Blank et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180359919 Blank et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180364726 Foster et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180368318 Isaac et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190021226 Dima et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190025175 Laugwitz Jan 2019 A1
20190041813 Horn et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190050948 Perry et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190057460 Sakaguchi et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190066234 Bedoya et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190069470 Pfeiffer et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190075727 Duke et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190085785 Abolt Mar 2019 A1
20190090423 Escher et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190098825 Neitemeier et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190104722 Slaughter et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190108413 Chen et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190114847 Wagner et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190124819 Madsen et al. May 2019 A1
20190129430 Madsen et al. May 2019 A1
20190136491 Martin et al. May 2019 A1
20190138962 Ehlmann et al. May 2019 A1
20190147094 Zhan et al. May 2019 A1
20190147249 Kiepe et al. May 2019 A1
20190150357 Wu et al. May 2019 A1
20190156255 Carroll May 2019 A1
20190174667 Gresch et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190183047 Dybro et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190200522 Hansen et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190230855 Reed et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190239416 Green et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190259108 Bongartz Aug 2019 A1
20190261550 Damme et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190261559 Heitmann et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190261560 Jelenkovic Aug 2019 A1
20190313570 Owechko Oct 2019 A1
20190327889 Borgstadt Oct 2019 A1
20190327892 Fries et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190335662 Good et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190335674 Basso Nov 2019 A1
20190343035 Smith et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190343043 Bormann et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190343044 Bormann et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190343048 Farley et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190351765 Rabusic Nov 2019 A1
20190354081 Blank et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190364733 Laugen et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190364734 Kriebel et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200000006 McDonald et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200008351 Zielke et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200015416 Barther et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200019159 Kocer et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200024102 Brill et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200029488 Bertucci et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200034759 Dumstorff et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200037491 Schoeny et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200053961 Dix et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200064144 Tomita et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200064863 Tomita et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200074023 Nizami et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200084963 Gururajan et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200084966 Corban et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200090094 Blank Mar 2020 A1
20200097851 Alvarez et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200113142 Coleman et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200117173 Terres et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200125098 Cavender-Bares Apr 2020 A1
20200125822 Yang et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200128732 Chaney Apr 2020 A1
20200128733 Vandike et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200128734 Brammeier et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200128735 Bonefas et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200128737 Anderson et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200128738 Suleman et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200128740 Suleman Apr 2020 A1
20200133262 Suleman et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200141784 Lange et al. May 2020 A1
20200146203 Deng May 2020 A1
20200150631 Frieberg et al. May 2020 A1
20200154639 Takahara et al. May 2020 A1
20200163277 Cooksey et al. May 2020 A1
20200183406 Borgstadt Jun 2020 A1
20200187409 Meyer et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200193589 Peshlov et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200196526 Koch et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200202127 Chen et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200202596 Kitahara et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200214231 Beeri et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200214281 Koch et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200221632 Strnad et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200221635 Hendrickson et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200221636 Boydens et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200236836 Barrick et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200250360 Hoffmann et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200250593 Peters et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200265527 Rose et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200278680 Schultz et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200317114 Hoff Oct 2020 A1
20200319632 Desai et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200319655 Desai Oct 2020 A1
20200323133 Anderson et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200323134 Darr et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200326674 Palla et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200326727 Palla et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200333278 Locken et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200337232 Blank et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200342225 Schumann et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200352099 Meier et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200359547 Sakaguchi et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200359549 Sakaguchi et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200363256 Meier et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200375083 Anderson et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200375084 Sakaguchi et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200378088 Anderson Dec 2020 A1
20200404842 Dugas et al. Dec 2020 A1
20210015041 Bormann et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210029877 Vandike et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210129853 Appleton et al. May 2021 A1
20210149406 Javault May 2021 A1
20210176916 Sidon et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210176918 Franzen et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210289687 Heinold et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210315163 Brewin Oct 2021 A1
20210321567 Sidon et al. Oct 2021 A1
20220110252 Vandike et al. Apr 2022 A1
20220151156 Bidram et al. May 2022 A1
20220327815 Picon Ruiz Oct 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (377)
Number Date Country
108898 Oct 2018 AR
20100224431 Apr 2011 AU
MU6800140 Dec 1989 BR
PI0502658 Feb 2007 BR
PI0802384 Mar 2010 BR
PI1100258 Mar 2014 BR
102014007178 Aug 2016 BR
1165300 Apr 1984 CA
2283767 Mar 2001 CA
2330979 Aug 2001 CA
2629555 Nov 2009 CA
135611 May 2011 CA
2451633 Oct 2001 CN
1614392 May 2005 CN
101236188 Aug 2008 CN
100416590 Sep 2008 CN
101303338 Nov 2008 CN
101363833 Feb 2009 CN
201218789 Apr 2009 CN
101839906 Sep 2010 CN
101929166 Dec 2010 CN
102080373 Jun 2011 CN
102138383 Aug 2011 CN
102277867 Dec 2011 CN
202110103 Jan 2012 CN
202119772 Jan 2012 CN
202340435 Jul 2012 CN
103088807 May 2013 CN
103181263 Jul 2013 CN
203053961 Jul 2013 CN
203055121 Jul 2013 CN
203206739 Sep 2013 CN
102277867 Oct 2013 CN
203275401 Nov 2013 CN
203613525 May 2014 CN
203658201 Jun 2014 CN
103954738 Jul 2014 CN
203741803 Jul 2014 CN
204000818 Dec 2014 CN
204435344 Jul 2015 CN
204475304 Jul 2015 CN
105205248 Dec 2015 CN
204989174 Jan 2016 CN
105432228 Mar 2016 CN
105741180 Jul 2016 CN
106053330 Oct 2016 CN
106198877 Dec 2016 CN
106198879 Dec 2016 CN
106226470 Dec 2016 CN
106248873 Dec 2016 CN
106290800 Jan 2017 CN
106327349 Jan 2017 CN
106644663 May 2017 CN
206330815 Jul 2017 CN
107111795 Aug 2017 CN
206515118 Sep 2017 CN
206515119 Sep 2017 CN
206616118 Nov 2017 CN
206696107 Dec 2017 CN
206696107 Dec 2017 CN
107576674 Jan 2018 CN
107576674 Jan 2018 CN
206906093 Jan 2018 CN
206941558 Jan 2018 CN
206941558 Jan 2018 CN
107736088 Feb 2018 CN
107795095 Mar 2018 CN
207079558 Mar 2018 CN
107941286 Apr 2018 CN
107957408 Apr 2018 CN
108009542 May 2018 CN
108304796 Jul 2018 CN
207567744 Jul 2018 CN
108614089 Oct 2018 CN
208013131 Oct 2018 CN
108881825 Nov 2018 CN
208047351 Nov 2018 CN
109357804 Feb 2019 CN
109485353 Mar 2019 CN
109633127 Apr 2019 CN
109763476 May 2019 CN
109961024 Jul 2019 CN
110262287 Sep 2019 CN
110720302 Jan 2020 CN
111201879 May 2020 CN
210585958 May 2020 CN
111406505 Jul 2020 CN
247426 Dec 1986 CS
248318 Feb 1987 CS
17266 Feb 2007 CZ
20252 Nov 2009 CZ
441597 Mar 1927 DE
504035 Jul 1930 DE
2354828 May 1975 DE
152380 Nov 1981 DE
3728669 Mar 1989 DE
4431824 May 1996 DE
19509496 Sep 1996 DE
19528663 Feb 1997 DE
19718455 Nov 1997 DE
19705842 Aug 1998 DE
19828355 Jan 2000 DE
10050224 Apr 2002 DE
10120173 Oct 2002 DE
202004015141 Dec 2004 DE
102005000770 Jul 2006 DE
102005000771 Aug 2006 DE
102008021785 Nov 2009 DE
102009041646 Mar 2011 DE
102010004648 Jul 2011 DE
102010038661 Feb 2012 DE
102011005400 Sep 2012 DE
202012103730 Oct 2012 DE
102011052688 Feb 2013 DE
102012211001 Jan 2014 DE
102012220109 May 2014 DE
102012223768 Jun 2014 DE
102013212151 Dec 2014 DE
102013019098 Jan 2015 DE
102014108449 Feb 2015 DE
2014201203 Jul 2015 DE
102014208068 Oct 2015 DE
102015006398 May 2016 DE
102015109799 Dec 2016 DE
112015002194 Jan 2017 DE
102017215087 Apr 2018 DE
102017204511 Sep 2018 DE
102019206734 Nov 2020 DE
102019114872 Dec 2020 DE
0070219 Oct 1984 EP
0355049 Feb 1990 EP
845198 Jun 1998 EP
0532146 Aug 1998 EP
1444879 Aug 2004 EP
1473673 Nov 2004 EP
1219159 Jun 2005 EP
1219153 Feb 2006 EP
1692928 Aug 2006 EP
1574122 Feb 2008 EP
1943877 Jul 2008 EP
2020174 Feb 2009 EP
1598586 Sep 2009 EP
1731983 Sep 2009 EP
2146307 Jan 2010 EP
0845198 Feb 2010 EP
2186389 May 2010 EP
2267566 Dec 2010 EP
3491192 Dec 2010 EP
2057884 Jan 2011 EP
2146307 May 2012 EP
2446732 May 2012 EP
2524586 Nov 2012 EP
2529610 Dec 2012 EP
2243353 Mar 2013 EP
2174537 May 2013 EP
2592919 May 2013 EP
1674324 May 2014 EP
2759829 Jul 2014 EP
2764764 Aug 2014 EP
2267566 Dec 2014 EP
2191439 Mar 2015 EP
2586286 Mar 2015 EP
2592919 Sep 2015 EP
2921042 Sep 2015 EP
2944725 Nov 2015 EP
2764764 Dec 2015 EP
2510777 Mar 2016 EP
2997805 Mar 2016 EP
3000302 Mar 2016 EP
2868806 Jul 2016 EP
3085221 Oct 2016 EP
3095310 Nov 2016 EP
3097759 Nov 2016 EP
2452551 May 2017 EP
3175691 Jun 2017 EP
3195719 Jul 2017 EP
3195720 Jul 2017 EP
3259976 Dec 2017 EP
3262934 Jan 2018 EP
3491192 Jan 2018 EP
3287007 Feb 2018 EP
3298876 Mar 2018 EP
3300579 Apr 2018 EP
3315005 May 2018 EP
3316208 May 2018 EP
2829171 Jun 2018 EP
2508057 Jul 2018 EP
2508057 Jul 2018 EP
3378298 Sep 2018 EP
3378299 Sep 2018 EP
2997805 Oct 2018 EP
3384754 Oct 2018 EP
3289853 Mar 2019 EP
3456167 Mar 2019 EP
3466239 Apr 2019 EP
3469878 Apr 2019 EP
3289852 Jun 2019 EP
3491192 Jun 2019 EP
3494770 Jun 2019 EP
3498074 Jun 2019 EP
3000302 Aug 2019 EP
3533314 Sep 2019 EP
3569049 Nov 2019 EP
3000307 Dec 2019 EP
3586592 Jan 2020 EP
3593613 Jan 2020 EP
3593620 Jan 2020 EP
3613272 Feb 2020 EP
3243374 Mar 2020 EP
3626038 Mar 2020 EP
3259976 Apr 2020 EP
3635647 Apr 2020 EP
3378298 May 2020 EP
3646699 May 2020 EP
3662741 Jun 2020 EP
3685648 Jul 2020 EP
2995191 Oct 2020 EP
2116215 Jul 1998 ES
2311322 Feb 2009 ES
5533 Nov 1913 FI
1451480 Jan 1966 FR
2817344 May 2002 FR
2901291 Nov 2007 FR
2901291 Nov 2007 FR
901081 Jul 1962 GB
201519517 May 2017 GB
01632DE2014 Aug 2016 IN
1632DE2014 Aug 2016 IN
201641027017 Oct 2016 IN
202041039250 Sep 2020 IN
7079681 Nov 1982 JP
S60253617 Dec 1985 JP
S63308110 Dec 1988 JP
H02196960 Aug 1990 JP
H02215311 Aug 1990 JP
H0779681 Mar 1995 JP
H1066436 Mar 1998 JP
H10191762 Jul 1998 JP
2000352044 Dec 2000 JP
2001057809 Mar 2001 JP
2002186348 Jul 2002 JP
2005227233 Aug 2005 JP
2006166871 Jun 2006 JP
2011205967 Oct 2011 JP
2015070812 Apr 2015 JP
2015151826 Aug 2015 JP
2015219651 Dec 2015 JP
2016071726 May 2016 JP
2016160808 Sep 2016 JP
6087258 Mar 2017 JP
2017136035 Aug 2017 JP
2017137729 Aug 2017 JP
2017195804 Nov 2017 JP
2018068284 May 2018 JP
2018102154 Jul 2018 JP
2018151388 Sep 2018 JP
2019004796 Jan 2019 JP
2019129744 Aug 2019 JP
2019146506 Sep 2019 JP
2019216744 Dec 2019 JP
2020018255 Feb 2020 JP
2020031607 Mar 2020 JP
2020113062 Jul 2020 JP
2020127405 Aug 2020 JP
100974892 Aug 2010 KR
100974892 Aug 2010 KR
20110018582 Feb 2011 KR
101067576 Sep 2011 KR
101067576 Sep 2011 KR
101134075 Apr 2012 KR
101447197 Oct 2014 KR
101653750 Sep 2016 KR
20170041377 Apr 2017 KR
200485051 Nov 2017 KR
200485051 Nov 2017 KR
101873657 Aug 2018 KR
GT06000012 Jan 2008 MX
178299 Apr 2000 PL
130713 Nov 2015 RO
1791767 Jan 1993 RU
2005102554 Jul 2006 RU
2421744 Jun 2011 RU
2421744 Jun 2011 RU
2447640 Apr 2012 RU
2502047 Dec 2013 RU
2502047 Dec 2013 RU
164128 Aug 2016 RU
2017114139 Apr 2017 RU
2017114139 Oct 2018 RU
2017114139 May 2019 RU
834514 May 1981 SU
887717 Dec 1981 SU
1052940 Nov 1983 SU
1134669 Jan 1985 SU
1526588 Dec 1989 SU
1540053 Jan 1991 SU
1761864 Sep 1992 SU
1986005353 Sep 1986 WO
2001052160 Jul 2001 WO
2002015673 Feb 2002 WO
2003005803 Jan 2003 WO
2007050192 May 2007 WO
WO-2009042238 Apr 2009 WO
2009156542 Dec 2009 WO
2010003421 Jan 2010 WO
2011104085 Sep 2011 WO
2012041621 Apr 2012 WO
2012110508 Aug 2012 WO
2012110544 Aug 2012 WO
2013063106 May 2013 WO
2013079247 Jun 2013 WO
2013086351 Jun 2013 WO
2013087275 Jun 2013 WO
2014046685 Mar 2014 WO
2014093814 Jun 2014 WO
2014195302 Dec 2014 WO
2015038751 Mar 2015 WO
2015153809 Oct 2015 WO
16020595 Feb 2016 WO
2016020595 Feb 2016 WO
2016118686 Jul 2016 WO
2017008161 Jan 2017 WO
2017060168 Apr 2017 WO
2017077113 May 2017 WO
2017092905 Jun 2017 WO
2017096489 Jun 2017 WO
2017099570 Jun 2017 WO
2017116913 Jul 2017 WO
2017170507 Oct 2017 WO
2017205406 Nov 2017 WO
2017205410 Nov 2017 WO
2018043336 Mar 2018 WO
2018073060 Apr 2018 WO
2018081043 May 2018 WO
2018081759 May 2018 WO
2018086764 May 2018 WO
2018112615 Jun 2018 WO
2018116772 Jun 2018 WO
2018142768 Aug 2018 WO
2018200870 Nov 2018 WO
2018206587 Nov 2018 WO
2018220159 Dec 2018 WO
2018226139 Dec 2018 WO
2018235486 Dec 2018 WO
2018235942 Dec 2018 WO
WO18235486 Dec 2018 WO
2019034213 Feb 2019 WO
2019079205 Apr 2019 WO
2019081349 May 2019 WO
2019091535 May 2019 WO
2019109191 Jun 2019 WO
2019124174 Jun 2019 WO
2019124217 Jun 2019 WO
2019124225 Jun 2019 WO
2019124273 Jun 2019 WO
2019129333 Jul 2019 WO
2019129334 Jul 2019 WO
2019129335 Jul 2019 WO
2019215185 Nov 2019 WO
2019230358 Dec 2019 WO
2020026578 Feb 2020 WO
2020026650 Feb 2020 WO
2020026651 Feb 2020 WO
2020031473 Feb 2020 WO
2020038810 Feb 2020 WO
2020039312 Feb 2020 WO
2020039671 Feb 2020 WO
2020044726 Mar 2020 WO
2020082182 Apr 2020 WO
2020100810 May 2020 WO
2020110920 Jun 2020 WO
2020195007 Oct 2020 WO
2020206941 Oct 2020 WO
2020206942 Oct 2020 WO
2020210607 Oct 2020 WO
2020221981 Nov 2020 WO
2021262500 Dec 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (255)
Entry
Martin et al., “Breakage Susceptibility and Harness of Corn Kernels of Various Sizes and Shapes”, May 1987, 10 pages.
Jones et al., “Brief history of agricultural systems modeling” Jun. 21, 2016, 15 pages.
Dan Anderson, “Brief history of agricultural systems modeling” 1 pages. Aug. 13, 2019.
A.Y. Şeflek, “Determining the Physico-Mechanical Characteristics of Maize Stalks Fordesigning Harvester”, The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 27(3): 2017, p. 855-860 ISSN: 1018-7081, Jun. 1, 2017.
Carmody, Paul, “Windrowing and harvesting”, 8 pages Date: Feb. 3, 2010.
Dabney, et al., “Forage Harvest Representation in RUSLE2”, Published Nov. 15, 2013, 17 pages.
John Deere S-Series Combines S760, S770, S780, S790 Brochure, 44 pages, Nov. 15, 2017.
Sekhon et al., “Stalk Bending Strength is Strongly Assoicated with Maize Stalk Lodging Incidence Across Multiple Environments”, Jun. 20, 2019, 23 pages.
Thomison et al. “Abnormal Corn Ears”, Apr. 28, 2015, 1 page.
Anderson, “Adjust your Combine to Reduce Damage to High Moisture Corn”, Aug. 13, 2019, 11 pages.
Sumner et al., “Reducing Aflatoxin in Corn During Harvest and Storage”, Reviewed by John Worley, Apr. 2017, 6 pages.
Sick, “Better understanding corn hybrid characteristics and properties can impact your seed decisions”, 8 pages, Sep. 21, 2018.
TraCI/Change Vehicle State—SUMO Documentation, 10 pages, Retrieved Dec. 11, 2020.
Arnold, et al., Chapter 8. “Plant Growth Component”, Jul. 1995, 41 pages.
Humburg, Chapter: 37 “Combine Adjustments to Reduce Harvest Losses”, 2019, South Dakota Board of Regents, 8 pages.
Hoff, “Combine Adjustments”, Cornell Extension Bulletin 591, Mar. 1943, 10 pages.
University of Wisconsin, Corn Agronomy, Originally written Feb. 1, 2006 | Last updated Oct. 18, 2018, 2 pages.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, “Combine Adjustments for Downed Corn—Crop Watch”, Oct. 27, 2017, 5 pages.
“Combine Cleaning: Quick Guide To Removing Resistant Weed Seeds (Among Other Things)”, Nov. 2006, 5 pages.
Dekalb, “Corn Drydown Rates”, 7 pages, Aug. 4, 2020.
Mahmoud et al. Iowa State University, “Corn Ear Orientation Effects on Mechanical Damage and Forces on Concave”, 1975, 6 pages.
Sindelar et al., Kansas State University, “Corn Growth & Development” Jul. 17, 2017, 9 pages.
Pannar, “Manage the Growth Stages of the Maize Plant With Pannar”, Nov. 14, 2016, 7 pages.
He et al., “Crop residue harvest impacts wind erodibility and simulated soil loss in the Central Great Plains”, Sep. 27, 2017, 14 pages.
Blanken, “Designing a Living Snow Fence for Snow Drift Control”, Jan. 17, 2018, 9 pages.
Jean, “Drones give aerial boost to ag producers”, Mar. 21, 2019, 4 pages.
Zhao et al., “Dynamics modeling for sugarcane sucrose estimation using time series satellite imagery”, Jul. 27, 2017, 11 pages.
Brady, “Effects of Cropland Conservation Practices on Fish and Wildlife Habitat”, Sep. 1, 2007, 15 pages.
Jasa, et al., “Equipment Adjustments for Harvesting Soybeans at 13%-15% Moisture”, Sep. 15, 2017, 2 pages.
Bendig et al., “Estimating Biomass of Barley Using Crop Surface Models (CSMs) Derived from UAV-Based RGB Imaging”, Oct. 21, 2014, 18 pages.
Robertson, et al., “Maize Stalk Lodging: Morphological Determinants of Stalk Strength”, Mar. 3, 2017, 10 pages.
MacGowan et al. Purdue University, Corn and Soybean Crop Deprediation by Wildlife, Jun. 2006, 14 pages.
Martinez-Feria et al., lowa State University, “Corn Grain Dry Down in Field From Maturity to Harvest”, Sep. 20, 2017, 3 pages.
Wrona, “Precision Agriculture's Value” Cotton Physiology Today, vol. 9, No. 2, 1998, 8 pages.
Zhang et al., “Design of an Optical Weed Sensor Using Plant Spectral Characteristics” Sep. 2000, 12 pages.
Hunt, et al., “What Weeds Can Be Remotely Sensed?”, 5 pages, May 2016.
Pepper, “Does An Adaptive Gearbox Really Learn How You Drive?”, Oct. 30, 2019, 8 pages.
Eggerl, “Optimization of Combine Processes Using Expert Knowledge and Methods of Artificial Intelligence”, Oct. 7, 1982, 143 pages.
Sheely et al., “Image-Based, Variable Rate Plant Growth Regulator Application in Cotton at Sheely Farms in California”, Jan. 6-10, 2003 Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Nashville, TN, 17 pages.
Kovacs et al., “Physical characteristics and mechanical behaviour of maize stalks for machine development”, Apr. 23, 2019, 1-pages.
Anonymously, “Optimizing Crop Profit Across Multiple Grain Attributes and Stover”, ip.com, May 26, 2009, 17 pages.
Breen, “Plant Identification: Examining Leaves”, Oregon State University, 2020, 8 pages.
Caglayan et al., A Plant Recognition Approach Using Shape and Color Features in Leaf Images, Sep. 2013, 11 pages.
Casady et al., “Precision Agriculture” Yield Monitors University of Missouri—System, 4 pages, 1998.
Apan et al., “Predicting Grain Protein Content in Wheat Using Hyperspectral Sensing of In-season Crop Canopies and Partial Least Squares Regression” 18 pages, 2006.
Xu et al., “Prediction of Wheat Grain Protein by Coupling Multisource Remote Sensing Imagery and ECMWF Data”, Apr. 24, 2020, 21 pages.
Day, “Probability Distributions of Field Crop Yields,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 47, Issue 3, Aug. 1965, Abstract Only, 1 page.
Butzen, “Reducing Harvest Losses in Soybeans”, Pioneer, Jul. 23, 2020, 3 pages.
Martin et al., “Relationship between secondary variables and soybean oil and protein concentration”, Abstract Only, 1 page., 2007.
Torres, “Precision Planting of Maize” Dec. 2012, 123 pages.
Extended European Search Report and Written Opinion issued in European Patent Application No. 22161407.6, dated Sep. 16, 2022, in 12 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/067,383 Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2023, 40 pages.
Application and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 16/175,993, filed Oct. 31, 2018, 28 pages.
Application and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,623, filed Apr. 10, 2019, 36 pages.
Application and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,511, filed Feb. 6, 2020, 55 pages.
“Automated Weed Detection With Drones” dated May 25, 2017, retrieved at: <<https://www.precisionhawk.com/blog/media/topic/automated-weed-identification-with-drones>>, retrieved on Jan. 21, 2020, 4 pages.
F. Forcella, “Estimating the Timing of Weed Emergence”, Site-Specific Management Guidelines, retrieved at: <<http://www.ipni.net/publication/ssmg.nsf/0/D26EC9A906F9B8C9852579E500773936/$FILE/SSMG-20.pdf>>, retrieved on Jan. 21, 2020, 4 pages.
Chauhan et al., “Emerging Challenges and Opportunities for Education and Research in Weed Science”, frontiers in Plant Science. Published online Sep. 5, 2017, 22 pages.
Apan, A., Wells , N., Reardon-Smith, K, Richardson, L, McDougall, K, and Basnet, B.B., 2008. Predictive mapping of blackberry in the Condamine Catchment using logistic regression and spatial analysis. In Proceedings of the 2008 Queensland Spatial Conference: Global Warning: What's Happening in Paradise. Spatial Sciences Institute, 11 pages.
Jarnevich, C.S., Holcombe, T.R., Barnett, D.T., Stohlgren, T.J. and Kartesz, J.T., 2010. Forecasting weed distributions using climate data: a GIS early warning tool. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 3(4), pp. 365-375.
Sa et al., “WeedMap: A Large-Scale Semantic Weed Mapping Framework Using Aerial Multispectral Imaging and Deep Neural Network for Precision Farming”, Sep. 6, 2018, 25 pages.
Pflanz et al., “Weed Mapping with UAS Imagery and a Bag of Visual Words Based Image Classifier”, Published Sep. 24, 2018, 28 pages.
Provisional Application and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 62/928,964, filed Oct. 31, 2019, 14 pages.
Application and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,475, filed Feb. 6, 2020, 55 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/067,483 Application and Drawings filed Oct. 9, 2020, 63 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,442 Application and Drawings filed Oct. 8, 2020, 65 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,550, filed Apr. 10, 2019, Application and Drawings, 47 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,999 Application and Drawings filed Oct. 9, 2020, 67 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,444 Application and Drawings filed Oct. 8, 2020, 102 pages.
Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 20167930.5 dated Sep. 15, 2020, 8 pages.
Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 19205901.2 dated Mar. 17, 2020, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/171,978, dated Dec. 15, 2020, 21 pages.
Zhigen et al., “Research of the Combine Harvester Load Feedback Control System Using Multi-Signal Fusion Method and Fuzzy Algorithm,” 2010, Publisher: IEEE, 5 pages.
Dan et al., “On-the-go Throughput Prediction in a Combine Harvester Using Sensor Fusion,” 2017, Publisher: IEEE, 6 pages.
Fernandez-Quintanilla et al., “Is the current state of the art of weed monitoring sutible for site-specific weed management in arable crops?”, First Published May 1, 2018, 4 pages.
Dionysis Bochtis et al. “Field Operations Planning for Agricultural Vehicles: A Hierarchical Modeling Framework.” Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript PM 06 021. vol. IX. Feb. 2007, pp. 1-11.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/432,557, filed Jun. 5, 2019, 61 pages.
European Search Report issued in counterpart European Patent Application No. 19205142.3 dated Feb. 28, 2020 (6 pages).
Mei-Ju et al., “Two paradigms in cellular Internet-of-Things access for energy-harvesting machine-to-machine devices: push-based versus pull-based,” 2016, vol. 6, 9 pages.
Yi et al., “An Efficient MAC Protocol With Adaptive Energy Harvesting for Machine-to-Machine Networks,” 2015, vol. 3, Publisher: IEEE, 10 pages.
Application and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 16/171,978, filed Oct. 26, 2018, 53 pages.
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 19203883.4 dated Mar. 23, 2020 (10 pages).
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/171,978 dated Oct. 28, 2020, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/171,978, dated Aug. 7, 2020, 9 pages.
K.R. Manjunath et al., “Developing Spectral Library of Major Plant Species of Western Himalayas Using Ground Observations”, J. Indian Soc Remote Sen (Mar. 2014) 42(a):201-216, 17 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,564 Application and Drawings filed Apr. 10, 2019, 55 pages.
S. Veenadhari et al., “Machine Learning Approach For Forecasting Crop Yield Based on Climatic Parameters”, 2014 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI-2014) Jan. 3-6, 2014, Coimbatore, India, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,531 dated Oct. 21, 2020, 10 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,531 Application and Drawings filed Apr. 10, 2019, 46 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,511 dated Jan. 19, 2023, 7 pages.
Application and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 18/158,005, filed Jan. 23, 2023, 62 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,999 dated Jan. 26, 2023, 6 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,475 Final Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2023, 20 pages.
Gayle, J. Somerville,et al. “Modelling Annual Grass Weed Seed Dispersal in Winter Wheat, When Influenced by Hedges and Directional Wind, Ecological Modeling”, vol. 410, Aug. 7, 2019, pp. 1-12.
Thompson SE, et al. Seconary Dispersal Driven by Overland Flow in Drylands: Review and Mechanistic Model Development. Mov Ecol. Apr. 17, 2014, pp. 1-13.
Gayle J. Somerville, et al. How Do Spatial Heterogeneity and Dispersal in Weed Population Models Affect Predictions of Herbicide Resistance Eveolution?, Ecological Modelling, 2017, pp. 37-53.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/344,517 Office Action dated May 25, 2022, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/432,557 dated Mar. 22, 2021, 9 pages.
Zhao, L., Yang, J., Li, P. and Zhang, L., 2014. Characteristics analysis and classification of crop harvest patterns by exploiting high-frequency multipolarization SAR data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(9), pp. 3773-3783.
Feng-Jie, X., Er-da, W. and Feng-yuan, X., Crop area yield risk evaluation and premium rates calculation—Based on nonparametric kernel density estimation. In 2009 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, 7 pages.
Liu, R. and Bai, X., 2014, May. Random fuzzy production and distribution plan of agricultural products and its PSO algorithm. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (pp. 32-36). IEEE.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/171,978 dated Mar. 31, 2021, 6 pages.
Application and Drawings for U.S. Appl. No. 17/067,383, filed Oct. 9, 2020, 61 pages.
Extended European Search Report and Written Opinion issued in European Patent Application No. 20208171.7, dated May 11, 2021, in 05 pages.
Cordoba, M.A., Bruno, C.I. Costa, J.L. Peralta, N.R. and Balzarini, M.G., 2016, Protocol for multivariate homegeneous zone delineation in precision agriculture, biosystems engineering, 143, pp. 95-107.
Pioneer Estimator, “Corn Yield Estimator” accessed on Feb. 13, 2018, 1 page. retrieved from: https://www.pioneer.com/home/site/us/tools-apps/growing-tools/corn-yield-estimator/.
Guindin, N. “Estimating Maize Grain Yield From Crop Biophysical Parameters Using Remote Sensing”, Nov. 4, 2013, 19 pages.
EP Application No. 19203883.4-1004 Office Action dated May 3, 2021, 4 pages.
Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, “Harvest Weed Seed Control”, Dec. 13, 2018, 6 pages. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/blog/bob-hartzler/harvest-weed-seed-control.
Getting Rid Of WeedsThrough Integrated Weed Management, accessed on Jun. 25, 2021, 10 pages. https://integratedweedmanagement.org/index.php/iwm-toolbox/the-harrington-seed-destructor.
The Importance of Reducing Weed Seeds, Jul. 2018, 2 pages. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/soybeans/soybean-handouts.pdf.
Alternative Crop Guide, Published by the Jefferson Institute, “Buckwheat”, Revised Jul. 2002. 4 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,444 Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2023, 34 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/067,383 Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2023, 36 pages.
Leu et al., Grazing Corn Residue Using Resources and Reducing Costs, Aug. 2009, 4 pages.
“No-Till Soils”, Soil Heath Brochure, 2 pages, last accessed Jul. 14, 2020.
Strickland et al., “Nitrate Toxicity in Livestock” Oklahoma State University, Feb. 2017, 2 pages.
Strickland et al., “Nitrate Toxicity in Livestock” Oklahoma State University, 8 pages, Feb. 2017.
Brownlee, “Neural Networks are Function Approximation Algorithms”, Mar. 18, 2020, 13 pages.
Thompson, “Morning glory can make it impossible to harvest corn”, Feb. 19, 2015, 3 pages.
Tumlison, “Monitoring Growth Development and Yield Estimation of Maize Using Very High-Resolution UAVImages in Gronau, Germany”, Feb. 2017, 63 pages.
Hunt, “Mapping Weed Infestations Using Remote Sensing”, 8 pages, Jul. 19, 2005.
Wright, et al., “Managing Grain Protein in Wheat Using Remote Sensing”, 12 pages, 2003.
“Malting Barley in Pennsylvania”, Agronomy Facts 77, 6 pages, Code EE0179 Jun. 2016.
“Green stem syndrome in soybeans”, Agronomy eUpdate Issue 478 Oct. 10, 2014, 3 pages.
“Keep Weed Seed Out of Your Harvest”, Aug. 8, 2019, 1 pages.
Hodrius et al., “The Impact of Multi-Sensor Data Assimilation on Plant Parameter Retrieval and Yield Estimation for Sugar Beet”, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XL-7/W3, 2015, 36th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, May 11-15, 2015, Berlin, Germany, 7 pages.
Fernandez-Quintanilla et al., “Is the current state of the art of weed monitoring suitable for site-specific weed management in arable crops?”, Feb. 2018, 35 pages.
Anonymously, “Improved System and Method for Controlling Agricultural Vehicle Operation Using Historical Data”, Dec. 16, 2009, 8 pages.
Anonymously, “System and Method for Controlling Agricultural Vehicle Operation Using Historical Data”, Jun. 30, 2009, 8 pages.
“Leafsnap, a new mobile app that identifies plants by leaf shape, is launched by Smithsonian and collaborators”, May 2, 2011, 5 pages.
Insect Gallery, Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Oct. 19, 2020, 8 pages.
Licht, “Influence of Corn Seeding Rate, Soil Attributes, and Topographic Characteristics on Grain Yield, Yield Components, and Grain Composition”, 2015, 107 pages,.
“Notice of Retraction Virtual simulation of plant with individual stem based on crop growth model”, Mar. 5, 2017, 7 pages.
Ma et al., “Identification of Fusarium Head Blight in Winter Wheat Ears Using Continuous Wavelet Analysis”, Dec. 19, 2019, 15 pages.
Leland, “Who Did that? Identifying Insect Damage”, Apr. 1, 2015, 4 pages.
“How to improve maize protein content” https://www.yara.co.uk/crop-nutrition/forage-maize/improving-maize-protein-content, Sep. 30, 2020, 10 pages.
Hafemeister, “Weed control at harvest, combines are ideal vehicles for spreading weed seeds”, Sep. 25, 2019, 3 pages.
“Harvesting Tips”, Northern Pulse Growers Association, 9 pages, Jan. 31, 2001.
Wortmann et al., “Harvesting Crop Residues”, Aug. 10, 2020, 8 pages.
“Harvesting”, Oklahoma State University, Canola Swathing Guide, 2010, 9 pages, last accessed Jul. 14, 2020.
Hanna, “Harvest Tips for Lodged Corn”, Sep. 6, 2011, 3 pages.
“Green Weeds Complicate Harvest”, Crops, Slider, Sep. 26, 2012, 2 pages.
“Agrowatch Green Vegetation Index”, Retrieved Dec. 11, 2020, 4 pages.
“Grazing Corn Residues” (http://www.ca.uky.edu), 3 pages, Aug. 24, 2009.
Jarnevich et al., Forecasting Weed Distributions Using Climate Data: A GIS Early Warning Tool, Downloaded on Jul. 13, 2020, 12 pages.
Combine Cutting and Feeding Mechanisms in the Southeast, By J-K Park, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 1963, 1 page.
Hartzler, “Fate of weed seeds in the soil”, 4 pages, Jan. 31, 2001.
Digman, “Combine Considerations for a Wet Corn Harvest”, Extension SpecialistUW—Madison, 3 pages, Oct. 29, 2009.
S-Series Combine and Front End Equipment Optimization, John Deere Harvester Works, 20 pages Date: Oct. 9, 2017.
Determining yield monitoring system delay time with geostatistical and data segmentation approaches (https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/50701000/cswq-0036-128359.pdf) Jul. 2002, 13 pages.
Precision Agriculture: Yield Monitors (dated Nov. 1998—metadata; last accessed Jul. 16, 2020) (https://extensiondata.missouri.edu/pub/pdf/envqual/wq0451.pdf) 4 pages.
Paul et al., “Effect of soil water status and strength on trafficability” (1979) (https://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdfplus/10.4141/cjss79-035), 12 pages, Apr. 23, 1979.
Sick, “Better understanding corn hybrid characteristics and properties can impact your seed decisions” (https://emergence.fbn.com/agronomy/corn-hybrid-characteristics-and-properties-impact-seed-decisions) By Steve Sick, FBN Breeding Project Lead | Sep. 21, 2018, 8 pages.
Robertson et al., “Maize Stalk Lodging: Morphological Determinants of Stalk Strength” Mar. 2017, 10 pages.
Martin, et al., “Breakage Susceptibility and Hardness of Corn Kernels of Various Sizes and Shapes”, May 1987, 10 Pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/158,005 Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 7, 2024, 8 pages.
Apan et al., “Predictive Mapping of Blackberry in the Condamine Catchment Using Logistic Regressiona dn Spatial Analysis”, Jan. 2008, 12 pages.
Robson, “Remote Sensing Applications for the Determination of Yield, Maturity and Aflatoxin Contamination in Peanut”, Oct. 2007, 275 pages.
Bhattarai et al., “Remote Sensing Data to Detect Hessian Fly Infestation in Commercial Wheat Fields”, Apr. 16, 2019, 8 pages.
Towery, et al., “Remote Sensing of Crop Hail Damage”, Jul. 21, 1975, 31 pages.
Sa et al., “WeedMap: A Large-Scale Semantic Weed Mapping Framework Using Aerial Multispectral Imaging and Deep Neural Network for Precision Farming”, Sep. 7, 2018, 25 pages.
Mathyam et al., “Remote Sensing of Biotic Stress in Crop Plants and Its Applications for Pest Management”, Dec. 2011, 30 pages.
Martinez-Feria et al., “Evaluating Maize and Soybean Grain Dry-Down In The Field With Predictive Algorithms and Genotype-by-Environmental Analysis”, May 9, 2019, 13 pages.
“GIS Maps for Agriculture”, Precision Agricultural Mapping, Retrieved Dec. 11, 2020, 6 pages.
Paul, “Scabby Wheat Grain? Increasing Your Fan Speed May Help”, https://agcrops.osu.edu/newsletter/corn-newsletter/2015-20/scabby-wheat-grain-increasing-yourfan-speed-may-help, C.O.R.N Newsletter//2015-20, 3 pages.
Clay et al., “Scouting for Weeds”, SSMG-15, 4 pages, 2002.
Taylor et al., “Sensor-Based Variable Rate Application for Cotton”, 8 pages, 2010.
Christiansen et al., “Designing and Testing a UAV Mapping System for Agricultural Field Surveying”, Nov. 23, 2017, 19 pages.
Haung et al., “AccurateWeed Mapping and Prescription Map Generation Based on Fully Convolutional Networks Using UAV Imagery”, Oct. 1, 2018, 12 pages.
Morrison, “Should You Use Tillage to Control Resistant Weeds”, Aug. 29, 2014, 9 pages.
Morrison, “Snow Trapping Snars Water”, Oct. 13, 2005, 3 pages.
“Soil Zone Index”, https://www.satimagingcorp.com/applications/natural-resources/agricultu . . . , Retrieved Dec. 11, 2020, 5 pages.
Malvic, “Soybean Cyst Nematode”, University of Minnesota Extension, Oct. 19, 2020, 3 pages.
Unglesbee, “Soybean Pod Shatter—Bad Enough to Scout Before Harvest?—DTN”, Oct. 17, 2018, 4 pages.
Tao, “Standing Crop Residue Can Reduce Snow Drifting and Increase Soil Moisture”, 2 pages, last accessed Jul. 14, 2020.
Berglund, et al., “Swathing and Harvesting Canola”, Jul. 2019, 8 pages.
Bell et al., “Synthetic Aperture Radar and Optical Remote Sensing of Crop Damage Attributed To Severe Weather in the Central United States”, Jul. 25, 2018, 1 page.
Rosencrance, “Tabletop Grapes in India to Be Picked by Virginia Tech Robots”, Jul. 23, 2020, 8 pages.
Lofton, et al., The Potential of Grazing Grain Sorghum Residue Following Harvest, May 13, 2020, 11 pages.
Beal et al., “Time Shift Evaluation to Improve Yield Map Quality”, Published in Applied Engineering in Agriculture Volume 17(3): 385-390 (© 2001 American Society of Agricultural Engineers ), 9 pages.
“Tips and Tricks of Harvesting High Moisture Grain”, https://www.koenigequipment.com/blog/tips-and-tricks-of-harvesting-highmoisture-grain, 7 pages, last accessed Jul. 14, 2020.
Ransom, “Tips for Planting Winter Wheat and Winter Rye (for Grain) (Aug. 15, 2019)”, 2017, 3 pages.
AgroWatch Tree Grading Maps, “The Grading Maps and Plant Count Reports”, https://www.satimagingcorp.com/applications/natural-resources/agricultu . . . , Retrieved Dec. 11, 2020, 4 pages.
Ackley, “Troubleshooting Abnormal Corn Ears”, Jul. 23, 2020, 25 pages.
Smith, “Understanding Ear Flex”, Feb. 25, 2019, 17 pages.
Carroll et al., “Use of Spectral Vegetation Indicies Derived from Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery For Detection of European Corn Borer Infestation in Iowa Corn Plots”, Nov. 2008, 11 pages.
Agriculture, “Using drones in agriculture and capturing actionable data”, Retrieved Dec. 11, 2020, 18 pages.
Bentley et al., “Using Landsat to Identify Thunderstorm Damage in Agricultural Regions”, Aug. 28, 2001, 14 pages.
Duane Grant and the Idaho Wheat Commission, “Using Remote Sensing to Manage Wheat Grain Protein”, Jan. 2, 2003, 13 pages.
Zhang et al., “Using satellite multispectral imagery for damage mapping of armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in maize at a regional scale”, Apr. 10, 2015, 14 pages.
Booker, “Video: Canadian cage mill teams up with JD”, Dec. 19, 2019, 6 pages.
AgTalk Home, “Best Combine to Handle Weeds”, Posted Nov. 23, 2018, 9 pages.
“Volunteer corn can be costly for soybeans”, Jun. 2, 2016, 1 page.
Pflanz, et al., “Weed Mapping with UAS Imagery and a Bag of Visual Words Based Image Classifier”, Published Sep. 24, 2018, 17 pages.
Hartzler, “Weed seed predation in agricultural fields”, 9 pages, 2009.
Sa et al., “Weedmap: A Large-Scale Sematnic Weed Mapping Framework Using Aerial Multispectral Imaging and Deep Neural Netowrk for Precision Farming”, Sep. 6, 2018, 25 pages.
Nagelkirk, Michigan State University-Extension, “Wheat Harvest: Minimizing the Risk of Fusarium Head Scab Losses”, Jul. 11, 2013, 4 pages.
Saskatchewan, “Wheat: Winter Wheat”, (https://www.saskatchewan.ca/business/agriculture-natural-resources-and-industry/agribusiness-farmers-and-ranchers/crops-and-irrigation/field-crops/cereals-barley-wheat-oats-triticale/wheat-winter-wheat) 5 pages, last accessed Jul. 14, 2020.
Quora, “Why would I ever use sport mode in my automatic transmission car? Will this incrase fuel efficiency or isit simply a feature that makes form more fun when driving?”, Aug. 10, 2020, 5 pages.
Wade, “Using a Drone's Surface Model to Estimate Crop Yields & Assess Plant Health”, Oct. 19, 2015, 14 pages.
Mathyam et al., “Remote Sensing of Biotic Stress in Crop Plants and Its Applications for Pest Stress”, Dec. 2011, 30 pages.
“Four Helpful Weed-Management Tips for Harvest Time”, 2 pages, Sep. 4, 2019.
Franz et al., “The role of topography, soil, and remotely sensed vegetation condition towards predicting crop yield”, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Mar. 23, 2020, 44 pages.
Peiffer et al., The Genetic Architecture of Maize Stalk Strength:, Jun. 20, 2013, 14 pages.
7 Combine Tweaks to Boost Speed (https://www.agriculture.com/machinery/harvest-equipment/7-combine-tweaks-to-boost-speed_203-ar33059) 8 pages, Aug. 19, 2018.
Managing corn harvest this fall with variable corn conditions (https://www.ocj.com/2019/10/managing-corn-harvest-this-fall-with-variable-corn-conditions/), 4 pages, Oct. 10, 2019.
Reducing Aflatoxin in Corn During Harvest and Storage (https://extension.uga.edu/publications/detail.html?number=B1231&title=Reducing%20Aflatoxin%20in%20Corn%20During%20Harvest%20and%20Storage), 9 pages, Published with Full Review on Apr. 19, 2017.
Variable Rate Applications to Optimize Inputs (https://www.cotton.org/tech/physiology/cpt/miscpubs/upload/CPT-v9No2-98-REPOP.pdf), 8 pages, Nov. 2, 1998.
Robin Booker, Video: Canadian cage mill teams up with JD (https://www.producer.com/2019/12/video-canadian-cage-mill-teams-up-with-jd/) , 6 pages, Dec. 19, 2019.
Jarnevich, et al. “Forecasting Weed Distributions using Climate Data: A GIS Early Warning Tool”, Invasive Plant Science and Management, 11 pages, Jan. 20, 2017.
Burks, “Classification of Weed Species Using Color Texture Features and Discriminant Analysis” (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.468.5833&rep=rep1&type=pdf), 8 pages, 2000.
John Deere, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gq77CfdGI4&list=PL1KGsSJ4CWk4rShNb3-sTMOliL8meHBL5 (last accessed Jul. 14, 2020), Jun. 15, 2020, 5 pages.
Combine Adjustments (http://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Management/L036.aspx), 2 pages, Originally written Feb. 1, 2006; last updated Oct. 18, 2018.
Ardekani, “Off- and on-ground GPR techniques for field-scale soil moisture mapping” Jun. 2013, 13 pages.
Does an Adaptive Gearbox Really Learn How You Drive? (https://practicalmotoring.com.au/voices/does-an-adaptive-gearbox-really-learn-how-you-drive/), Oct. 30, 2019, 8 pages.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222527694_Energy_Requirement_Model_for_a_Combine_Harvester_Part_I_Development_of_Component_Models, Abstract Only, Jan. 2005.
http://canola.okstate.edu/cropproduction/harvesting, 8 pages, Aug. 2011.
“Tips and Tricks of Harvesting High Moisture Grain”, https://www.koenigequipment.com/blog/tips-and-tricks-of-harvesting-highmoisture-grain, 5 pages, last accessed Feb. 11, 2021.
Hoff, Combine Adjustements, Mar. 1943, 8 pages.
Haung et al., “Accurate Weed Mapping and Prescription Map Generation Based onFully Convolutional Networks Using UAV Imagery”, 14 pages, Oct. 1, 2018.
Thompson, “Morning glory can make it impossible to harvest corn”, Feb. 19, 2015, 4 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,475 Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2023, 21 pages.
Benvenuti, Weed seed movement and dispersal strategies in the agricultural environment, 2007, Weed Biology and Management, 7, pp. 141-157 (Year:2007), 18 pages.
Chante et al., A flexible and practical approach for real-time weed emergence prediction based on Artificial Neural Networks, 2018, Biosystems Engineering, vol. 170, pp. 51-60 (Year:2018), 10 pages.
Xiujun et al., “Integrating Map Services and Location-based Services for Geo-Referenced Individual Data Collection,” 2008, vol. 5, Publisher: IEEE, 4 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,511 Final Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2022, 35 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/067,383 Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2022, 256 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,444 Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2022, 273 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,999 Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2022, 225 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,442 Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2022, 228 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,442 Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 30, 2022, 11 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/185,570 Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2023, 9 pages.
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,691 including: Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 10, 2021 and Application and Drawings filed Apr. 10, 2019, 46 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/831,216 Application and Drawings filed Mar. 26, 2020, 56 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,531 dated Apr. 5, 2021, 5 pages.
Martin et al. Breakage Susceptibiltiy and Hardness of Corn Kernels of Various Sizes and Shapes, vol. 3( ) May 1087, 10 pages. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e579/1b5363b6a78efd44adfb97755a0cdd14f?ca.pdf.
Hoff, “Combine Adjustments” (https://smallfarmersjournal.com/combine-adjustments/). Mar. 1943, 9 pages.
Optimizing Crop Profit Across Multiple Grain Attributes and Stover, Electronic Publication Date May 26, 2009, 17 pages.
Unglesbee, Soybean Pod Shatter—Bad Enough to Scout Before Harvest—DTN, Oct. 17, 2018, 11 pages. Susceptibility to shatter (https://agfax.com/2018/10/17/soybean-pod-shatler-bad-enough-to-scout-before-harvest-dtn/).
GIS Maps for Agricultural, accessed on May 10, 2022. 7 pages. https://www.satimagingcorp.com/services/geographic-information-systems/gis-maps-agriculture-mapping.
https://wingtra.com/drone-mapping-applications/use-of-drones-in-agriculture, accessed on May 10, 2022, 19 pages.
Energy Requirement Model for a Combine Harvester: Part 1: Development of Component Models, Published online Dec. 22, 2004, 17 pages.
Energy Requirement Model for a Combine Harvester, Part 2: Integration of Component Models, Published online Jan. 18, 2005, 11 pages.
Pioneer on reducing soybean harvest losses including combine adjustments (last accessed Jul. 23, 2020) (https://www.pioneer.com/us/agronomy/reducing_harvest_losses_in_soybeans.html), 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,511, dated Jun. 8, 2022, 21 pages.
Colbach, N., Busset, H., Roger-Estrade, J. and Caneill, J., 2014. Predictive modelling of weed seed movement in response to superficial tillage tools, Soil and tillage research. 138, pp. 1-8.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/067,383 dated Nov. 2, 2022, 38 pages.
Benvenuti, S., 2007. Weed seed movement and dispersal strategies in the agricultural environment, Weed biology and management, 7, pp. 141-157.
Chantre, G.R., Vigna, M.R., Renzi, J.P. and Blanco, A.M., 2018. A flexible and practical approach for real-time weed emergence prediction based on Artificial Neural Networks. Biosystems engineering, 170, pp. 51-60.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,511 dated Nov. 4, 2022, 19 pages.
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 18/158,005 dated Sep. 14, 2023, 11 pages.
Lamsal et al. “Sugarcane Harvest Logistics in Brazil” Iowa Research Online, Sep. 11, 2013, 27 pages.
Jensen, “Algorithms for Operational Planning of Agricultural Field Operations”, Mechanical Engineering Technical Report ME-TR-3, Nov. 9, 2012, 23 pages.
Chauhan, “Remote Sensing of Crop Lodging”, Nov. 16, 2020, 16 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220167547 A1 Jun 2022 US
Continuation in Parts (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 17066442 Oct 2020 US
Child 17666963 US
Parent 16783511 Feb 2020 US
Child 17066442 US
Parent 16783475 Feb 2020 US
Child 17066442 US
Parent 16380531 Apr 2019 US
Child 17066442 US
Parent 16171978 Oct 2018 US
Child 17066442 US