Predictive pulse width modulation for an open delta H-bridge driven high efficiency ironless permanent magnet machine

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8796978
  • Patent Number
    8,796,978
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 1, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 5, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Embodiments of the present method and system permit an effective method for determining the optimum selection of pulse width modulation polarity and type including determining machine parameters, inputting the machine parameters into a predicted duty cycle module, determining the optimum polarity of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on a pulse width modulation generation algorithm, and determining the optimum type of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on the pulse width modulation generation algorithm.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to a method and system that makes use of the availability of the machine parameters required to achieve optimal selection of pulse width modulation polarity and type. More specifically, the disclosure relates to a method and system that uses a predictive duty cycle employing machine parameters to determine both the magnitude and the pulse width of the pulse width modulation that is required to generate a waveform at a given operation condition, as well as the polarity of the pulse width modulation.


BACKGROUND

A permanent magnet machine is a type of alternating current (AC) motor whereby power is supplied to the rotating device by means of imposing an electromagnetic field onto a field generated by a permanent magnet rotor. To control an AC permanent magnet machine, the absolute position of the magnetic field produced by the rotor permanent magnets (PM) needs to be known at all times. The magnet's position is important for determining the stator current magnitude of the machine necessary to produce the desired torque. This operation is known as the stator current commutation. Since magnets are rotating with respect to the stator, the magnet position can be calculated by measuring the rotor absolute angular position. Absolute position sensors such as resolvers and optical encoders are typically used to measure the absolute angular position of the machine rotor.


H-bridge topologies are commonly used to drive open delta permanent magnet machines, as well as other types of machines. An H-bridge is an electronic circuit which enables a voltage to be applied across a load in either direction. The term “H-bridge” is derived from the typical graphical representation of such a circuit as seen in FIG. 1A. An H-bridge is built with four switches, which may be solid-state or mechanical. As seen in FIG. 1B, when switches S1 and S4 are closed, and switches S2 and S3 are open, a positive voltage will be applied across the motor. However, by opening switches S1 and S4, and closing switches S2 and S3 (FIG. 1C), this voltage is reversed allowing reverse operation of the motor. An H-bridge arrangement may be used to reverse the polarity of the motor, but may also be used to stop the motor if the motor's terminals are shorted.


One of the main benefits for using an H-bridge to drive a PM machine is that it lowers the ripple current in the motor windings that results from the pulsating voltage waveforms of the pulse modulated power stage. Ripple current is a small unwanted residual periodic variation of the direct current output of a power supply which has been derived from an alternating power source. Another benefit garnered from driving a PM machine with an H-bridge is that the H-bridge allows a greater level of flexibility to shape the current waveform beyond the 120-degree limitation imposed by a conventional 3-phase inverter.


To properly control the currents and to minimize the harmonic content in the current waveforms, robust control must be performed. One of the issues with H-bridge control is that in order to reduce the machine ripple current, unipolar pulse width modulation (PWM) must be employed. With unipolar PWM, a 50% reduction in ripple current is achieved when compared to bipolar PWM. When using unipolar PWM during transition periods where the machine emf voltage has a different polarity from the terminal voltage, a combination of unipolar and bipolar PWM must be employed; otherwise, current distortion will result. The existing prior art merely selects unipolar verses bipolar PWM based upon the sign of the current waveform. This conventional approach leads to additional harmonics in the current waveform that will lead to increased heating in the machine.


SUMMARY

The present method and system optimizes the pulse width modulation generation by appropriately determining when unipolar or bipolar PWM should be used, by exploiting the machine temperature measurements, machine parameters, operation conditions, and the dynamic model of the machine windings.


Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a computer-implemented method for determining a predictive duty cycle that is able to determine the magnitude and pulse width of an H-bridge pulse width modulation that is used to drive a machine motor, including determining machine parameters, inputting the machine parameters into a predicted duty cycle module, determining the optimum polarity of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on a pulse width modulation generation algorithm, and determining the optimum type of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on the pulse width modulation generation algorithm.


The embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a system for determining a predictive duty cycle that is able to determine the magnitude and pulse width of an H-bridge pulse width modulation that is used to drive a machine motor, including means for determining machine parameters, means for inputting the machine parameters into a predicted duty cycle module, means for determining the optimum polarity of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on a pulse width modulation generation algorithm; and means for determining the optimum type of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on the pulse width modulation generation algorithm.


The embodiments of the present disclosure further relate to a computer-readable medium for determining a predictive duty cycle that is able to determine the magnitude and pulse width of an H-bridge pulse width modulation that is used to drive a machine motor, including means for determining machine parameters, means for inputting the machine parameters into a predicted duty cycle module, means for determining the optimum polarity of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on a pulse width modulation generation algorithm; and means for determining the optimum type of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on the pulse width modulation generation algorithm.


The method for determining a predictive duty cycle that is able to determine the magnitude and pulse width of an H-bridge pulse width modulation that is used to drive a machine motor may include that the type of the predicted duty cycle is one of unipolar or bipolar, and the pulse width modulation generation algorithm is








d
prediction



(

θ
elect

)


=


(




E
emf



(


T

magnet




rpm

)


·

sin


(

θ
elect

)



+



i
ref



(

θ
elect

)





R
s



(

T
winding

)



+

L
·




i
ref




t




)

Vbus






wherein Eemf(Tmagnet,rpm) is the back emf of the machine as a function of the magnet temperature and speed, θelect is the electrical angle for the machine during that particular duty cycle, Iref is an input quantity of reference current, i.e., the amount of current that the processor wants to get out of that particular duty cycle, Rs is the phase resistance of the machine and is a known input parameter, Twinding is the temperature of the windings in the coil, and is also a known input parameter, L is the inductance of the inductor and is also an input parameter, and Vbus is the supply voltage of the inverter, and is a quantity that is measured by an analog-to-digital converter.


The system for determining a predictive duty cycle that is able to determine the magnitude and pulse width of an H-bridge pulse width modulation that is used to drive a machine motor may further include that the type of the predicted duty cycle is one of unipolar or bipolar, and the pulse width modulation generation algorithm is








d
prediction



(

θ
elect

)


=


(




E
emf



(


T

magnet




rpm

)


·

sin


(

θ
elect

)



+



i
ref



(

θ
elect

)





R
s



(

T
winding

)



+

L
·




i
ref




t




)

Vbus






wherein Eemf(Tmagnet,rpm) is the back emf of the machine as a function of the magnet temperature and speed, θelect is the electrical angle for the machine during that particular duty cycle, Iref is an input quantity of reference current, i.e., the amount of current that the processor wants to get out of that particular duty cycle, Rs is the phase resistance of the machine and is a known input parameter, Twinding is the temperature of the windings in the coil, and is also a known input parameter, L is the inductance of the inductor and is also an input parameter, and Vbus is the supply voltage of the inverter, and is a quantity that is measured by an analog-to-digital converter.


The computer-readable medium for determining a predictive duty cycle that is able to determine the magnitude and pulse width of an H-bridge pulse width modulation that is used to drive a machine motor may further include that the type of the predicted duty cycle is one of unipolar or bipolar, and the pulse width modulation generation algorithm is








d
prediction



(

θ
elect

)


=


(




E
emf



(


T

magnet




rpm

)


·

sin


(

θ
elect

)



+



i
ref



(

θ
elect

)





R
s



(

T
winding

)



+

L
·




i
ref




t




)

Vbus






wherein Eemf(Tmagnet,rpm) is the back emf of the machine as a function of the magnet temperature and speed, θelect is the electrical angle for the machine during that particular duty cycle, Iref is an input quantity of reference current, i.e., the amount of current that the processor wants to get out of that particular duty cycle, Rs is the phase resistance of the machine and is a known input parameter, Twinding is the temperature of the windings in the coil, and is also a known input parameter, L is the inductance of the inductor and is also an input parameter, and Vbus is the supply voltage of the inverter, and is a quantity that is measured by an analog-to-digital converter.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure is described through a preferred embodiment and the attached drawings in which:



FIG. 1A is a schematic representation of the general structure of an H-bridge;



FIG. 1B is a schematic representation of an H-bridge in one basic state;



FIG. 1C is schematic representation of an H-bridge in another basic state;



FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the magnets used in the motor in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the arrangement of the system in one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the of a duty cycle with respect to one embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 5A is a schematic diagram of a 3-phase open delta machine model;



FIG. 5B is an expanded view of a terminal of the machine;



FIG. 6 is a block diagram for determining the sign and type of the predicted duty cycle; and



FIG. 7 is a flowchart for determining the optimum pulse width modulation for a duty cycle.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Applicants have discovered a method and system to optimize the pulse width modulation generation by appropriately determining when a unipolar verses a bipolar pulse width modulation should be used. Moreover, the present method and system uses a predictive method to determine when bipolar verses unipolar PWM should be used, and this prediction is based on factors such as machine temperature measurements, machine parameters, operation conditions, and the dynamic model of the machine windings.


A preferred embodiment of the motor/generator used in the present method and system is illustrated in FIG. 2. The motor/generator of the present method and system includes, among other things, ironless rotor magnets 202, 204, as well as a stator 206.



FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention, including a processor 302 with a duty cycle prediction module 304 which sends information to a pulse width modulator 306. The pulse width modulator 306 switches the pulse for a permanent magnet machine 308.



FIG. 4 illustrates a graphical representation of a duty cycle with respect to one embodiment of the present method and system. FIG. 4 depicts, by way of example, when a duty cycle is unipolar and how the machine and processor determines when unipolar positive pulses verses unipolar negative pulses are used in the duty cycle. This graphical representation also shows the transition periods when the machine emf voltage has a different polarity from the terminal voltage, and a combination of unipolar and bipolar pulse width modulation must be should be applied to avoid current distortion.



FIG. 5A illustrates a 3-phase open delta configuration machine model that includes schematic representations for three power sources Ea, Eb, and Ec, three resistors Ra, Rb, and Rc, and three inductors La, Lb, and Lc, although other configurations are contemplated. The currents ia, ib, and ic of each of the phases are also depicted in the machine model seen in FIG. 5A. The machine model is considered an open delta configuration since the three windings are not all connected to one point. The machine is able to receive digital-signals which dictate the motor's movement. For instance, in the case of a permanent magnet machine, the motor is started spinning by the motor setting the current vector to a very high DC magnitude. Setting the current vector to a high constant value enables the magnetic field vector of the motor to align itself with the current vector. At this initial time, the torque angle of the motor is near zero.



FIG. 5B is an expanded view of a terminal of the machine, depicting a terminal being driven by an H-bridge at a power stage 504. The power stage 504 includes the four switches S1, S2, S3, S4 of the H-bridge. Thus, the machine is said to have 6-switching poles since the motor has 3 phases. FIG. 4B also depicts the supply voltage Vbus and a capacitor C.



FIG. 6 depicts a flow diagram for determining which of the switching poles needs to be switched based on the sign and polarity of the of duty cycle. This is accomplished by a processor by solving the algorithm:








d
prediction



(

θ
elect

)


=



(




E
emf



(


T

magnet




rpm

)


·

sin


(

θ
elect

)



+



i
ref



(

θ
elect

)





R
s



(

T
winding

)



+

L
·




i
ref




t




)

Vbus

.





Where:


Eemf(Tmagnet,rpm) is the back emf of the machine as a function of the magnet temperature and speed;


θelect is the electrical angle for the machine during that particular duty cycle;


Iref is an input quantity of reference current, i.e., the amount of current that the processor wants to get out of that particular duty cycle;


Rs is the phase resistance of the machine and is a known input parameter;


Twinding is the temperature of the windings in the coil, and is also a known input parameter;


L is the inductance of the inductor and is also an input parameter; and


Vbus is the supply voltage of the inverter, and is a quantity that is measured by an analog-to-digital converter. Some or all of the input parameters/quantities do not have to be measured during the operation of the machine, but rather can be known prior to operation. Parameters that are unknown prior to the operation of the machine may be measured during operation.


The sign (+or −) of the output of the algorithm, dpredictive, delineated above will determine which of the switching poles needs to be switched. When dpredictive is a positive value then the pulse width modulation is unipolar positive, thus switching S1 and S2 on while maintaining S4 on and S3 off will drive a current in the positive direction. When dpredictive is a negative value, the pulse width modulation is unipolar negative, thus switching S3 and S4 on while maintaining S2 on and S1 off will drive a current in the negative direction.


As illustrated in FIG. 6, once the processor inputs parameters 602 into the predictive duty cycle 604, the algorithm is able to determine the sign 606 of the predictive duty cycle, as well as the value of dpredicitive 608, which determines the polarity of the duty cycle. Moreover, the processor determines a predicted duty cycle such that the PI regulator 610 is limited in the amount of current correction that it implements, i.e., such that the actual current 614 in the motor is close to the reference current 612 that the processor wants to get out of that particular duty cycle. This reduces the ripple current of the machine and consequently the machine motor runs more efficiently.



FIG. 7 illustrates a flowchart for optimizing the torque of a permanent magnet machine in one embodiment of the present method and system. In step 702, machine parameters are determined. These parameters may be values known prior to the operation of the machine, and/or they may be parameters that are measured during the operation of the machine. Next, in step 704, the machine parameters are input into a duty cycle prediction module. Then, the optimum polarity of the pulse width modulation is determined for a predicted duty cycle based on a pulse width modulation generation algorithm, which is the equation described above, in step 706. Finally, in step 708, the optimum type of pulse width modulation is determined for a predicted duty cycle based on a pulse width modulation generation algorithm.


Although, the above recited method and system is described for implementation in a permanent magnet machine, this system, method, and computer-readable medium could be used in any type of motor that has a back emf that is proportional to speed.


Thus, the above described method, system, and computer-readable medium in accordance with the embodiments of the present method and system, as can now be fully appreciated, provides a very effective method for determining the optimum selection of pulse width modulation polarity and type.


The method and system has been described through a preferred embodiment. However, various modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the method and system as defined by the appended claims and legal equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method for determining a predictive duty cycle that is able to determine the magnitude and pulse width of an H-bridge pulse width modulation that is used to drive a machine motor, comprising: determining one or more machine parameters;inputting the machine parameters into a predicted duty cycle module;determining the optimum polarity, selected from a negative polarity or a positive polarity, of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on a pulse width modulation generation algorithm; anddetermining, during a transition period in which machine emf voltage has a different polarity from a terminal voltage, whether the pulse width modulation is unipolar or bipolar for a predicted duty cycle based on the pulse width modulation generation algorithm.
  • 2. A system for determining a predictive duty cycle that is able to determine the magnitude and pulse width of an H-bridge pulse width modulation that is used to drive a machine motor, comprising: means for determining one or more machine parameters;means for inputting the machine parameters into a predicted duty cycle module;means for determining the optimum polarity, selected from a negative polarity or a positive polarity, of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on a pulse width modulation generation algorithm; andmeans for determining, during a transition period in which machine emf voltage has a different polarity from a terminal voltage, whether the pulse width modulation is unipolar or bipolar for a predicted duty cycle based on the pulse width modulation generation algorithm.
  • 3. A non-transitory computer-readable medium for determining a predictive duty cycle that is able to determine the magnitude and pulse width of an H-bridge pulse width modulation that is used to drive a machine motor, comprising: means for determining one or more machine parameters;means for inputting the machine parameters into a predicted duty cycle module; andmeans for determining the optimum polarity, selected from a negative polarity or a positive polarity, of the pulse width modulation for a predicted duty cycle based on a pulse width modulation generation algorithm; andmeans for determining, during a transition period in which machine emf voltage has a different polarity from a terminal voltage, whether the pulse width modulation is unipolar or bipolar for a predicted duty cycle based on the pulse width modulation generation algorithm.
CLAIM OF BENEFIT AND INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/565,727, entitled “PREDICTIVE PULSE WIDTH MODULATION FOR AN OPEN DELTA H-BRIDGE DRIVEN HIGH EFFICIENCY IRONLESS PERMANENT MAGNET MACHINE”, filed Sep. 23, 2009, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/194,102 to DABOUSSI., filed Sep. 23, 2008, entitled “PREDICTIVE PWM FOR OPEN DELTA H-BRIDGE DRIVE HIGH EFFICIENCY IRONLESS P.H. METER”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (28)
Number Name Date Kind
5313148 Sears et al. May 1994 A
5365153 Fujita et al. Nov 1994 A
5428522 Millner et al. Jun 1995 A
5977737 Labriola, II Nov 1999 A
6703803 Ohiwa et al. Mar 2004 B2
6703809 Royak et al. Mar 2004 B2
7064504 Imai et al. Jun 2006 B2
7106024 Harbaugh et al. Sep 2006 B2
7193383 Sarlioglu et al. Mar 2007 B2
7202622 Eskritt et al. Apr 2007 B2
7208908 Anghel et al. Apr 2007 B2
7230837 Huang et al. Jun 2007 B1
7245104 Tomigashi et al. Jul 2007 B2
7358696 Iwanaga et al. Apr 2008 B2
7525269 Patel et al. Apr 2009 B2
7652441 Ying Yin Ho Jan 2010 B2
7772725 Siman-Tov Aug 2010 B2
8031495 Sachdeva et al. Oct 2011 B2
8242720 Daboussi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8242731 Daboussi et al. Aug 2012 B2
20040100216 Makaran et al. May 2004 A1
20050225275 Eskritt et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060006829 Anghel Jan 2006 A1
20070001635 Ho Jan 2007 A1
20070040528 Tomigashi et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070132415 Patel et al. Jun 2007 A1
20100188033 Daboussi et al. Jul 2010 A1
20120326639 Daboussi et al. Dec 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
1473391 Feb 2004 CN
H06-14405 Jan 1994 JP
10-1244299 Mar 2013 KR
10-1246049 Mar 2013 KR
Non-Patent Literature Citations (29)
Entry
Office Action in Korea Patent Application No. 10-2000-7009295 dated Jun. 26, 2012.
Notice of Allowance in Korea Patent Application No. 10-2000-7009295 dated Dec. 20, 2012.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/565,741 dated Jan. 17, 2012.
Search Report in Chinese Application No. 200980146650.4, dated Mar. 13, 2013.
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980146650.4, dated Mar. 22, 2013.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-528095, dated Apr. 18, 2013.
Search and Examination Report in Singapore Patent Application No. 201102802-4, mailed Aug. 22, 2012.
Search and Examination Report in Singapore Patent Application No. 201102800-8, mailed Aug. 22, 2012.
Office Action in Korea Patent Application No. 10-2011-7009295 dated Jun. 26, 2012.
Notice of Allowance in Korea Patent Application No. 10-2011-7009295 dated Dec. 20, 2012.
Prokop, L. et al., “3-phase BLDC Motor Control with Sensorless Back-EMF ADC Zero Crossing Detection Using 56F80x, Design of Motor Control Application Based on the Software Development Kit SDK,” Freescale Semiconductor, Application Note AN 1913, Rev. 3, Nov. 2005, 60 pages.
International Search Report in PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/058117, mailed Nov. 24, 2009.
International Search Report in PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/058119, mailed Nov. 20, 2009.
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Patent Application No. 201102802-4, mailed Dec. 2, 2011.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/565,727, mailed Jan. 6, 2012.
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Patent Application No. 201102800-8, mailed Dec. 2, 2011.
Office Action in CA Application No. 2,740,401, dated Jan. 23, 2013.
Office Action in AU Application No. 2009296685, dated Jan. 2, 2013.
Office Action in CA Application No. 2,740,404, dated Jan. 29, 2013.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/547,453, dated Mar. 19, 2013.
Japanese Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-528095, mailed on Apr. 23, 2013.
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980146648.7, mailed on May 31, 2013.
Second Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2009296683, mailed on Sep. 12, 2013.
Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 in Australian Application No. 2009296683 mailed on Mar. 1, 2013.
Japanese Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-528096 mailed on Apr. 23, 2013.
Korean Office Action in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2011-7008982 mailed on Jun. 26, 2012.
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/565,741 dated Apr. 27, 2012.
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/565,727 dated Apr. 19, 2012.
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/547,453 dated Jul. 12, 2013.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120326651 A1 Dec 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61194102 Sep 2008 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12565727 Sep 2009 US
Child 13460976 US