The invention generally pertains to prefabricated building panels and, more particularly, energy code compliant panels with performance improvement and cost and material reductions.
Prefabricated building panels are a popular implement in today's construction industry, especially for commercial applications. Labor time and costs associated with welding and bolting, for example, significantly increase the cost of traditional construction whereby individual materials (e.g., external siding, insulation, support framing, etc.) are generally arranged and assembled at the job site. Mixing concrete at the job site includes labor costs as well as down time to permit the concrete to set. These and similar costs have been somewhat reduced in recent years by the development and increased use of precast concrete and, in particular, prefabricated building panels which combine precast concrete with other materials such as insulation and support framing. These panels are generally built and assembled at an off site location and then transported to the construction site, ready for installation. At the job site, the panels are hoisted and moved into position on the incomplete building structure. Once in position, construction workers may then bolt and/or weld the panels to the building frame and/or floor and to one another to fix them in their final locations.
Despite the advantages identified above, known prefabricated building panels are far from ideal. Existing panels tend to be very heavy, typically in the range of 90 lbs per square foot, and in all cases require heavy machinery such as cranes to lift and maneuver at the job site. In general, the design of prefabricated building panels is a challenging puzzle of inseparable pros and cons. For example, in order to support the weight of itself and potentially other building elements (e.g., roofing, neighboring panels, etc.), the concrete must be quite thick, generally 6 or more inches. The height of many present day commercial buildings means wind speeds also become a critical consideration and further require increased material thicknesses for greater strength. While thicker concrete improves the strength of a panel, it obvious greatly increases the weight and volume of the panel, both effects being highly undesirable.
Newer energy codes for buildings, especially renovations and new construction, continue to set more stringent performance criteria. As new codes go into effect, the construction industry is faced with a need for new alternatives which strike the difficult balance of such factors as weight, size (e.g., panel thickness), thermal insulation, strength (e.g., as measured in psi or maximum incident wind speed), and material costs.
New energy codes such as the latest ASHRAE and IECC are met by prefabricated building panels which combine materials with unexpected specifications (e.g., material thicknesses) and performance. These new panels represent a new class of panels with performance characteristics which only emerge from the combination of their constituent parts.
According to an exemplary embodiment, a prefabricated building panel comprises a concrete slab having a thickness equal to or less than 2 inches; a plurality of stainless steel anchors permanently imbedded in the concrete slab; framing permanently secured to the concrete slab by the plurality of stainless steel anchors for structural reinforcement, the plurality of stainless steel anchors maintaining a spacing between said concrete slab and said framing of 0.5 to 3 inches; and a continuous insulation which fills at least 0.5 to 3 inches of the spacing between the concrete slab and the framing. Other exemplary embodiments with alternative or additional features are also disclosed.
Prefabricated building panels are discussed herein as having two opposite and substantially parallel faces. For panels ultimately installed as part of a building exterior, an “outer face” refers to the side of a panel which faces outward from the building after installation.
For most panels, the “outer face” will comprise concrete or a façade behind which is concrete. An “inner face” refers the side of the panel which faces inward toward the building interior after installation. These terms are nominal only and are not intended to limit the applications or use of the panels described herein. Panels having an “outer face” and “inner face” may be installed on a building exterior or in interior spaces of a building, where interior spaces of the building are to both sides of the panel.
Referring now the drawings, and in particular
At a broad level, a panel 100 differs significantly from existing prefabricated building panels such as that which is disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 5,699,644 for a number of combined features, including but not limited to: a comparatively thinner concrete slab, a comparatively wider spacing between the concrete slab and the framing, and anchors which are made of stainless steel.
In some exemplary embodiments, concrete slab 101 preferably has a thickness 110 equal to or less than 2 inches, and most preferably equal to or less than 1.5 inches (see
In exemplary embodiments, framing 102 may be, for example, galvanized steel studs or similar supporting members. C-shaped studs or beams are well suited for this application, but other alternatives supplying the same supportive functionality may occur to those of skill in the art and are likewise employable in the practice of the invention. In exemplary embodiments, individual studs or beams of framing 102 are assembled using automobile assembly spot-welding. Unique to panel 100 over prefabricated building panels known in the art is the feature that framing 102 comprises a plurality of parallel beams which may be spaced apart by spacing 120 at least as large as 4 feet. Older panels such as that which is disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 5,699,644 necessitated adjacent parallel beams be spaced apart no more than 2 feet. In the older panels, separation exceeding 2 feet would generally compromise the required structural integrity of the overall panel; the reduced amount of framing would be insufficient to support the weight of the comparatively very thick concrete slabs. In light of the thinness and resulting lightness of concrete slabs 101 in panel 100, spacing 120 between adjacent beams of framing 102 may exceed 2 feet, 2.5 feet, 3 feet, 3.5 feet, up to at least 4 feet. As compared to existing panels such as that which is disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 5,699,644, a panel 100 may also have studs or beams of framing 102 which are smaller in width 150. Width 150 of framing 102 may be 6 inches or less, 5 inches or less, or 4 inches or less. Width 150 may be in the range of 4 inches to 6 inches.
Framing 102 is permanently secured to concrete slab 101 by a plurality of anchors 103 which, in exemplary embodiments, are stainless steel. As shown in the drawings, some exemplary embodiments of a panel 100 are manufactured such that a head of each anchor 103 is permanently imbedded in the concrete of slab 101. The opposite end of each anchor 103 is welded to framing 102. In an assembled state, a panel 100 has a spacing 130 between the concrete slab 101 and the nearest framing 103 of 0.5 inch to 3 inches. In some exemplary embodiments, spacing 130 is at least 1.5 inches. In still further exemplary embodiments, spacing 130 is preferably at least 2 inches or most preferably at least 2.5 inches or more. Spacing 130 is fixed and maintained by the anchors 103, these being imbedded in the concrete slab 101 and welded to framing 102.
Known prefabricated building panels have anchors, bolts, or screws which are generally made of regular steel (i.e., not stainless steel). The provision of stainless steel anchors 103 in exemplary embodiments of the present invention is particularly advantageous over the existing art for at least the reason that stainless steel is approximately 38% less thermally conductive as compared to regular steel. As a result, there is less heat transfer between the inner face and outer face of the panel 100.
Insulation 104 is arranged between concrete slab 101 and framing 102. In exemplary embodiments, insulation 104 is a continuous insulation. The through penetration of anchors 103 through insulation 104 does not disqualify it from being accurately described as “continuous”. Insulation 104 fills at least some of the spacing 130 and, in most exemplary embodiments, fills an entirety of the spacing 130. Geometrically, the thickness of insulation 104 within spacing 130 cannot exceed the span of spacing 130. However, the thickness 140 of insulation 104 (see
The span of spacing 130 is unexpectedly large in contrast to existing panels such as that which is disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 5,699,644. Owing to insulation 104 being of a thickness equal to or greater than the span of spacing 130 in exemplary embodiments, weightbearing support of the panel 100 is provided in part by the thick rigid volume of insulation 104. This reduces the maximum load which concrete slab 101 is required to bear, permitting the concrete slab to be even thinner than would be permitted with insulation having a comparative small thickness (e.g., 1 inch or less).
For some embodiments, a panel 100 may further include furring or hat channels 106 and/or gypsum board (i.e. drywall) 107. Traditional panels have an inner face consisting of only insulation and framing, and materials such as gypsum board must be installed on the job site after the panels have been maneuvered and fixed into their final positions on the building structure. In contrast, some embodiments of the present invention include channels 106 and gypsum board 107 (as is indicated by the dashed portion of the curvy bracket associated with reference numeral 100 in
Panels 100 may take a variety of dimensions, including different widths 160 and heights 170 (see
While an exemplary application of panels 100 is for exterior walls, some panels 100 or variations thereof may also be used for other purposes including but not limited to interior walls, flooring, or roofing.
While exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed herein, one skilled in the art will recognize that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.