The present invention relates in general to foundations for towers and, in particular, to foundations for towers in telecommunication sites that are commonly used by a plurality of networks or users, each network or user requiring its own equipment shelter.
Many types of wireless telecom networks, and especially cellular telephone networks or the like, require a large number of remote, unmanned sites.
In areas where no buildings, or only very low-rise buildings exist, such sites are normally located on bare ground, and are usually referred to as “Greenfield Sites”. A Greenfield site employs a tower which supports various antennae at required heights above the ground, and in most cases also at least one shelter, which is usually a prefabricated small room serving as an enclosure for the indoor electronic equipment. When the Greenfield site serves more than one network, either a plurality of shelters or a single larger shelter may be used. In such shared sites, the facility of housing each network's equipment in a separately accessible individual room contemplates an operational and security advantage, as each operator may independently maintain and exercise its own access control procedures.
The construction of a new Greenfield site in compliance with the law requires, in most if not all countries, the prior obtainment of a building permit.
In recent years, as the number of various network operators in each country, and consequently the number and density of Greenfield sites, have been constantly increasing—the obtainment of building permits for new Greenfield sites serving a single network has become increasingly difficult, especially in the more developed countries, where environmental aspects have become an increasingly important consideration. The authorities tend to encourage network operators to share amongst themselves the use of common new sites, and at the same time to build sites which present minimal possible disturbance to the environment, by making (amongst others measures) most efficient use of ground space.
At the same time, new wireless telecom networks tend increasingly to be built under fast roll-out constraints. Consequently, solutions which employ prefabricated elements instead of cast-on-site concrete elements, thus enabling more rapid construction in almost any weather condition, contemplate clear advantages to network roll-out managers.
An additional important aspect is the budgetary one: in the vast majority of Greenfield sites built to date, or even those being presently built, the tower foundation and the equipment shelter (or shelters) are function-wise totally separated from each other. A solution which makes a multi-functional use of the same elements (i.e. the shelters) has therefore the potential of significant cost savings, compared to the “conventional” solutions described above.
Accordingly, there is a felt need for, and an expected welcoming acceptance of, a rapidly deployable foundation for the tower in Greenfield telecom sites serving a plurality of networks or users, comprising a plurality of prefabricated concrete equipment shelters coupled together, thus forming a suitable foundation for the tower, and altogether consuming minimal ground-space.
Numerous patents, patent applications and other prior art publications relate to antenna towers or the like, foundations for the same, and to equipment shelters or other type enclosures for electronic equipment, meant to be located near the base of a tower.
The following publications are believed to be the most relevant fore reference as prior art herein:
Disclosed in International Patent Application No. PCT/BR98/00029 to BITTENCOURT DE MIRA is a shelter for telecommunications equipment, particularly suitable for housing equipment utilized in cell phone systems and other telecommunications systems, this shelter being positioned in the internal region of a telecommunications tower, and having a cross section analogous to that of the tower. In addition, the shelter is divided into at least two floors. There is also disclosed a telecommunications tower, particularly utilizable in cell phone systems, which comprises a shelter positioned in its internal region.
Disclosed in International Patent Application No. PCT/GBOO/04846 to SMITH is a foundation comprising at least one prefabricated foundation element.
Disclosed in International Patent Application No. PCT/IL01/00174 to SILBER is a foundation for a tower, which is formed of a plurality of prefabricated slabs coupled together so as to function as a monolithic foundation.
Disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,351,250 to GILLEN is an antenna tower and support apparatus, which includes a foundation and a building mounted on the foundation, the building including a plurality of vertically spaced apart building sections (preferably two, three or more), a bottom and a top. A tower is supported upon the top of the building. A plurality of antenna are attached at multiple elevational positions. Each building section has a security area that is separate from the security area of the other building sections. A plurality of antenna portals are provided at least one on each building section. A plurality of antenna cables are provided, each cable extending from an antenna to a security area of a building section via an antenna portal, wherein each security area has at least one antenna cable that extends to it. Each security area has telecommunications equipment that is connected to one of the antenna cables.
Disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0023394 to McGINNIS is an easily-constructed foundation for an antenna support tower, that requires no fabricated support surface at the installation site. The foundation is a radial array of prefabricated buildings connected near their inner corners to each other. In a first embodiment, one leg of a multi-legged tower rests on each building, the buildings transferring forces from the tower to the support surface below the buildings. In a second embodiment, a tapered monopole tower is located in the center of the array of buildings. The monopole tower may rest on a prepared surface or may be supported above the support surface. Support structures, each having a central ring and radially extending arms, are attached at the building connection points, one support structure above the other. The monopole tower is positioned within the central ring, transferring lateral loads through the ring and arms to the buildings, negating the need for a moment base.
The shelter to BITTENCOURT DE MIRA is indeed designed to facilitate space-efficient installation of a telecommunication site, but it has no role whatsoever as a foundation to the tower or any other structural role.
The foundation to SMITH may indeed consist of a plurality of prefabricated foundation elements, but these elements are all rather small, and designed to support altogether not more than one equipment shelter.
The foundation to SILBER indeed comprises a plurality of prefabricated concrete elements, but these elements are flat slabs, and the connection there between is made substantially vertically, whereas the connection between the prefabricated shelters in the present invention is made substantially horizontally. Furthermore, there is no mention whatsoever to equipment shelters.
The antenna tower and support apparatus to GILLEN is employing vertically spaced apart building sections (i.e. shelters) while in the present invention the equipment shelters are spaced apart horizontally. Furthermore, the antenna tower and support apparatus to GILLEN require a separate, conventionally built foundation, while in the present invention the coupled shelters themselves serve essentially also as a foundation for the tower.
The foundation to McGINNIS is indeed the publication which is at shortest distance to the present invention, as there is also a plurality of equipment shelters spaced apart horizontally, connected altogether and suited to serve as a foundation for a tower. Nevertheless, the system used in the present invention for coupling every two adjacent shelters is totally different than that disclosed by McGINNIS, not only in detail but in the essential basic concept: in the foundation to McGINNIS the shelters are connected to each other only in their corners, while in the present invention the shelters abut each other, and are coupled to each other, through substantial wall surfaces. This provides a much stronger structural bonding between the shelters, and indeed facilitates their functioning altogether as a monolithic foundation. Furthermore, McGINNIS envisions only radially symmetrical layouts of substantially rectangular identical shelters, which therefore can contact each other only at their inner corners, while the present invention envisions numerous possible layouts of various shape shelters, either symmetrical or un-symmetrical. Even when utilizing four identical rectangular shelters according to the present invention, these shelters would not be arranged radially, but rather in a much more compact arrangement, as disclosed in the preferred embodiment herein. Owing to the said layout advantage, the foundation constructed according to the present invention would consume a much smaller ground space than a similar foundation constructed according to McGINNIS, and will also have a much neater appearance: a smooth square plan contour instead of a cross-like plan contour. Finally, the present invention also features an optional foundation enhancement possibility, which is not envisioned at all by McGINNIS.
It is an aim of the present invention to provide an efficient overall solution for a telecommunication site or the like, based on the ground and employing a tower, which is utilized by a plurality of networks or users. The efficiency of the solution provided by the present invention results from its basic concept, of making a multi-functional use of a plurality of prefabricated concrete equipment shelters.
There is provided, therefore, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a foundation for a tower, comprising a plurality of prefabricated concrete shelters, each suitable for housing indoor equipment of a telecom network or the like, said shelters being arranged on site such that every shelter is abutting and coupled to at least one other adjacent shelter, such that a substantially vertical surface of contact exists there between, across which the means of said coupling is transversely effected, resultantly all said shelters are mechanically attached together and function as a monolithic foundation.
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, each of said shelters includes certain apparatus for anchoring part of tower-base, located on its roof, such that said anchoring apparatus of the entirely assembled foundation is geometrically fit and mechanically adequate to receive the base of said tower, either directly or through an interfacing tower-base structure.
There is also provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for constructing a foundation for a tower, said method primarily including:
In order to facilitate utilization of the present invention even when the overturning loads effected by the tower, due to its height and wind-drag exposure, exceed the overturning resistance capacity of the basic foundation assembly of shelters, there is further provided, in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention, a foundation enhancement assembly, placed underneath the assembly of said shelters, the two assemblies being fastened to each other by appropriate means of vertical fastening, said foundation enhancement assembly comprising.
A plurality of equi-high prefabricated concrete foundation elements, each having the shape of a box open at its top, said foundation elements being arranged on site such that every foundation element is abutting and coupled to at least one other adjacent foundation element, such that a substantially vertical surface of contact exists there between, across which the means of said coupling is transversely effected, resultantly all said foundation elements are mechanically attached together and function as a monolithic foundation.
According to yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, said foundation enhancement assembly further includes an outwardly horizontal projection of its floor from its perimeter walls, all along its perimeter or along any part thereof, so as to increase the contact area between the bottom surface of said foundation enhancement assembly and the underlying supporting surface.
There is also provided, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, which may be effected in conjunction with the utilization of said foundation enhancement assembly, a method for constructing said foundation, including:
The present invention, as well as some preferred embodiments thereof, may be best understood and appreciated from the following detailed description made in conjunction with the drawings in which:
The present invention relates to a multi-functional foundation for the tower of a telecommunication site or the like, where the design of a plurality of prefabricated concrete equipment shelters, which are required primarily for the purpose of housing the indoor equipments of a plurality of networks utilizing said tower, is made such that these shelters, after being appropriately positioned and coupled altogether, function also as a suitable foundation for the tower.
As long as the overturning resistance capacity (by structural analysis methods complying with all applicable standards) of the basic foundation assembly described above is found sufficient to stabilize said tower, considering its height and antenna loading—said basic foundation construction, comprising only said coupled shelters, will be applied, and will therefore be placed totally above ground level. Nevertheless, even in said case, the natural soil underneath the foundation (with some excess dimensions there around) down to a certain depth, all subject to engineering choices or constraints, may be replaced with an improved quality soil or base material, such as gravel, crushed stone or sand, which would be properly compacted before the foundation assembly works commence.
When, however, considering the tower's height and antenna loading, the overturning resistance capacity of the basic foundation assembly (described in the previous paragraph) is not sufficient and must be increased—an enhancement assembly of prefabricated foundation elements, which are coupled together in a method similar to that used for coupling together said shelters, and which is placed under said assembly of coupled shelters (and, in most part, under finished ground level) comes into use. The assembly of coupled shelters is mechanically fastened down to said enhancement assembly of prefabricated foundation elements using an adequate fastening method. It would be appreciated by any person skilled in the art, after studying the details of the foundation enhancement as described herein, that the complete enhanced foundation assembly has a considerably increased overturning resistance capacity, compared with the basic foundation assembly described in the previous paragraph.
Thus, one purpose of the present invention is to provide a neat and efficient solution for the tower foundation and equipment housing in sites where the tower is utilized by a plurality of networks or users, and therefore a plurality of equipment shelters is required. A by-product of the present invention, resulting from the essence of the solution, is that the tower base, located on the shelters' roofs, is not accessible to un-authorized visitors, removing the basic need to surround the site with a fence.
The efficiency of a site utilizing the present invention may be measured, most meaningfully, in terms of its lower cost, compared to the alternative aggregate cost of a plurality of other type shelters, together with the cost of a conventional cast-on-site foundation for the tower, and a fencing all around. Additionally, said efficiency may be measured in terms of the much smaller ground-area required for a multi-user site (i.e. a site used by a plurality of users or networks), a ground area saving which is desirable for both increasing the feasibility of site lease and permitting, and at the same time reducing land lease costs for the long term.
The other purpose of the present invention is to provide a rapidly executable solution for such multi-user Greenfield sites, a property which may be highly appreciated and most welcome when the sites need to be built under fast network roll-out constraints. The entire foundation is made of completely prefabricated components, having transportable dimensions and weights, and except for a possible thin layer of lean (or normal) concrete, which has no structural significance, no other cast-on-site concrete is required in order to form a monolithic and stable foundation for the tower.
The foundation according to the present invention is formed of a plurality of prefabricated concrete components, which may be all identical or, alternatively, may comprise several types. The heart of the invention is the geometrical arrangement of all said components, of which the exact shape and dimensions of each are determined, as well as the methods used to couple together all the components of the foundation, and make them function effectively and safely as if they were one monolithic foundation.
It would be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that a foundation constructed according to the present invention, while being sound for the long term and therefore suitable to serve as a permanent facility, is also removable if needed, without leaving a non-recoverable trace on site, and therefore may also be suitable for temporary applications. Besides the positive aspect of cost recovery, when the intension is indeed to deploy a short or medium term solution, there is, in some countries, an additional advantage associated with said “removable” feature: a simplified Building Permit procedure.
Referring to
The tower foundation according to the present invention is formed of several prefabricated equipment shelters, preferably at least three shelters, made of reinforced concrete. In the embodiment of the invention illustrated in
Shelters 12 are arranged such that a polar symmetry exists there between, about a central vertical axis of polar symmetry 1. In the preferred embodiment illustrated in
Every two adjacent shelters 12 are abutting each other, with a substantially vertical surface of contact 50 defined there between. The means for coupling together said every two adjacent shelters 12, as described below, are effected transversely through said surface of contact 50, or more accurately, through both abutting concrete walls, each located on either side of said surface of contact 50.
It will be appreciated that the equipment shelters made according to the present invention may be all identical in plan shape and dimensions, or all different from each other, or part of them identical and the rest different, all depending on engineering choices or constraints. However, all said equipment shelters must geometrically fit each other such that altogether, when positioned and coupled as designed for that purpose, they form a complete foundation of the designed shape and size.
It will be further appreciated that the contour shape (and size) of the complete foundation assembly made according to the present invention may be of various geometrical shapes, such as substantially triangular, square, hexagonal, circular, etc.
Referring now to
Referring again to
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the appropriate mechanical fixing of the tower base to the foundation 10 may be achieved also by other anchoring apparatus known in the art, such as embedded steel plates or profiles with appropriate holes for bolting. Nevertheless, the use of anchor bolts has the important advantage of possible adjustment of the tower's verticality after the completion of the foundation's construction. For this reason, the use of anchor bolts 40 is selected herein as part of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
In the preferred embodiment illustrated in
It will be appreciated, however, that a foundation constructed according to an alternative embodiment of the present invention, or even the foundation illustrated in
Following from all the above, it will be appreciated that each of foundation 10 illustrated in
The shelters house indoor electronic equipments, and the tower supports various antennae, which are electronically connected to said equipments. The means for said electronic connection can be any kind of feeder cables or other antenna cables, which must be routed in between said antennae and said indoor equipments. One possible way to route said feeder cables or antenna cables is to penetrate vertically through the shelter's roof slab. This method, however, contemplates a great hazard of rain-water penetration into the shelter through the cables' penetration detail, in case that detail is not sealed watertight with ultimate perfection, and is certainly not the common method. The common and preferable method is to penetrate into the shelter substantially horizontally, through one of its perimeter walls, which are not abutting adjacent shelters. Yet the use of an outwardly facing perimeter wall for cable penetration has also several clear disadvantages, the most important of which are the vulnerability of the cables and the greater lengths of the cable routes.
Hence, it becomes desirable to have an internal vertical shaft, which would facilitate a substantially horizontal cable penetration into each of the shelters (i.e. through a wall) while ensuring minimal route lengths for the cables as well as minimal degree of vulnerability.
Referring again to
Referring now to
Nevertheless, the utilization of a central or internal vertical shaft is only a preferred option, which may be disregarded.
In order to complete a neat penetration of the antenna cables, as well as other possible utility cables or pipes, through the walls of the shelters, it would be a good practice to prepare the penetration openings in the shelters' casting. These openings may be of any desired quantity, shapes, sizes and locations, all subject to specific engineering considerations. Most preferably, said openings will be fitted to receive certain types of cable penetration sealing devices, available as off-the-shelf purchase items.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The most simplified embodiment of the means for coupling together every two adjacent shelters is shown in
It will be appreciated that both the embodiment illustrated in
Nevertheless, a much more favorable solution is one in which no part of the means for coupling together two adjacent shelters would project inwards from the shelter's wall surface. To make said more favorable solution feasible, said end tightening assemblies of the elongated connecting members must be concealed within large enough recesses in the abutting concrete walls.
The left hand side of
Both embodiments illustrated in
Under various service loads, to which the tower and the foundation may be subjected, shear stresses may develop within the substantially vertical surface of contact defined between any two adjacent shelters (surface 50 in the embodiment illustrated in
If the faces in contact of any two abutting walls would be totally planar surfaces, then the resistance of the system to said relative movement resulting from shear stresses depends only upon the friction developed in between said two surfaces in contact, which by itself depends upon two factors: the surfaces' friction factor, governed by the material and by the surfaces' roughness, and the normal contact pressure there between, which is governed by the extent of tightening the means for coupling the shelters.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that, in some realistic loading scenarios, said friction might not provide sufficient resistance to said relative movement resulting from shear stresses, and therefore said resistance must be increased.
The optional apparatus provided in the present invention, for increasing said resistance to relative movement resulting from shear stresses, is the provision of a bulge or a plurality of bulges, of any desired shape and size, in said substantially vertical surface of contact defined between any two adjacent shelters. In practical terms, each said bulge is defined by a protrusion formed on one of said two abutting walls, and a socket of a matching shape, size and location, formed in the second of said two abutting walls, the protrusions and sockets are designed so as to interlock with each other, and thereby prevent any possible relative movement there between.
Referring now to
It will be appreciated that during the various handling operations that every shelter must be subjected to, such as loading for transportation, off-loading on site and bringing to final position with the use of a crane on site, said protrusions may become vulnerable to damage due to mechanical impact. One possible method for protecting said protrusions, and optionally also said sockets, against damages resulting from mechanical impacts is to provide over any desired part of their surfaces liners of material more durable than the concrete, such as steel. Said liners will be placed, obviously, prior to casting the concrete of the respective walls.
Another possible practical problem may be caused by penetration of a hard foreign particle, such as a small stone, to the space in between any two abutting walls during assembly operations on site. Resultantly, when the shelters are pulled as close as possible to each other, through maximal tightening of the means for coupling them together, even to a degree that said foreign particle is crushed, it might still prevent the final desired contact between the surfaces of said walls, and consequently said protrusions and matching sockets would not reach full interlocking contact, and the benefit of applying said protrusions and sockets would be derogated.
One feasible solution, making the system substantially immune to the potential problem described above, is designing the abutting wall surfaces of the shelters geometrically such that, in the process of assembling any two adjacent shelters, when said protrusions and matching sockets fully interlock, and resultantly the respective adjacent shelters may not be brought any closer to each other, a relatively thin clearance remains in between the substantially planar parts of the two abutting wall surfaces. By any mechanical consideration, and as long as said protrusions cover a certain minimal percentage of the abutting wall's area, said thin clearances may be left free and the foundation would nevertheless function properly for the long term. For some non-structural considerations, however, it would be preferable to fill the said clearances with cement based grout, or with any other suitable material of no structural role, after final tightening of the means for coupling the shelters.
The precise detailed method of constructing a foundation made in accordance with the present invention may vary from one specific application to the other, a variation that depends, primarily, upon the specific soil conditions, as well as the specific topographical conditions existing on site before the commencement of the construction works.
For example, if the tower is to be located on a site where a sound rock extends up to the ground surface level, then the load bearing capacity of the natural base in the surface level would not constitute any problem, and the only measure that must be applied is the provision of a well-leveled base surface to receive the foundations. This would normally be achieved by flattening the rock surface in the site area to the best possible extent, and then applying a minimal thickness layer of lean (or normal) concrete, which would be proficiently leveled smooth. The use of a granular base layer instead of the concrete is also an option, but then additional measures must be taken to reassure that any part of said granular material might not be washed away by surface running rain water.
If, however, the tower is to be located on normal soil, then the issue of the natural soil's load bearing capacity, as well as other properties of said natural soil, in the various depths, must be carefully examined, by a common practice of soil boring and sampling, and analyzed by an expert, who would establish the recommended measures required to provide an adequate load-bearing surface for the foundation at substantially the ground surface level.
In the common case, said recommended measures would include the excavation and removal of a low quality natural top-soil layer, the exact thickness of which would depend on the specific site conditions, and backfilling with an imported, improved quality soil or base material, such as gravel, crushed stone or sand. Then, on top of the well leveled backfilled base the shelters may be directly placed, or a geo-textile sheet may be placed between the two, or by the most preferable alternative practice, a thin layer of lean (or normal) concrete may be applied and proficiently leveled smooth to serve as best quality support surface for placement of the prefabricated shelters.
From this point and on, the method for assembling the foundation would be substantially uniform in all cases: The shelters are placed, with the use of a sufficient capacity crane, on said prepared base one by one, in a sequential order, so that (with the exception of the first shelter) as soon as each shelter is brought into its final position, relative to the preceding shelter, it is coupled to said preceding shelter and said coupling means are tightened before the assembly process proceeds. Obviously, some of the shelters, in most embodiments the last shelter, must be fitted simultaneously to a plurality of preceding shelters, as well as be coupled to them all at the same time.
In Step (a) the site area is excavated down to a depth of natural soil with appropriate load bearing capacity;
In Step (d) the first prefabricated shelter is brought to its designated final position;
Everything described in detailed reference to the drawings up to this point relates to the basic foundation assembly, comprising only the coupled shelters, which is applicable as long as the overturning resistance capacity of said basic assembly is sufficient to stabilize the tower, considering its height and wind-drag loads.
When a larger tower is required, and consequently a foundation with increased overturning resistance capacity must be applied in order to safely stabilize such tower, an additional foundation enhancement assembly would come into use. The foundation enhancement assembly is placed under said basic assembly of shelters, and it comprises a plurality of prefabricated concrete foundation elements, all having uniform height, shaped as boxes with open tops, arranged on site with abutting walls and coupled altogether using similar means to those used to couple the shelters altogether.
Additionally, another set of vertical means of fastening the assembly of shelters down to the assembly of foundation elements is provided in the shelters' floors and in the foundation elements' tops.
In a preferred embodiment of the foundation enhancement assembly, the floor of the assembly is projecting horizontally outwards from its perimeter walls, all around the perimeter or along any part thereof, so as to increase the contact area between the bottom surface of the foundation and the underlying supporting surface.
Referring now to
Bores 122, forming part of the means of transverse coupling the foundation elements 120, may also be seen in
Additionally, on the top surfaces of the walls of foundation element 102, there can be seen, in
The entire means for vertical fastening the shelters 12 down to foundation elements 102 may be better understood from
It can be seen, in
It can be also seen in
Yet it is more likely, that such a projection of any fastening element from the shelter's floor may not be acceptable by the users. In that case, bores 144 must include recesses 142, which may be similar in shape and size to recesses 90 or 91 in the walls of shelters 12, or different there from, yet the role they fulfill is exactly the same. Comparing the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
It would be clear to any person skilled in the art that the incorporation of the foundation enhancement assembly will also effects the method of constructing the foundation. In addition to the need to prepare before hand a greater number of different prefabricated components, the sequence of construction stages on site is also slightly effected.
When step (h) is completed, the foundation is ready to receive the respective tower on its roof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PO201065 | Mar 2002 | HU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/HU03/00023 | 3/24/2003 | WO |