Preform extended finish for processing light weight ecologically beneficial bottles

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11827410
  • Patent Number
    11,827,410
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 6, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 28, 2023
    5 months ago
Abstract
A plastic preform apparatus is disclosed that is suitable for forming a bottle. The plastic preform apparatus features a neck portion adapted to engage a closure and includes a support ring at its lowermost point. The neck portion features a first wall thickness, and an elongated body portion including a cylindrical wall portion and an end cap. An upper segment of the body portion adjacent to the support ring features a second wall thickness substantially similar to the first wall thickness and less than a third wall thickness in a lower segment of the body portion.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to plastic bottles and preforms, more specifically plastic performs and bottles blown from such preforms that are suitable for containing beverages and utilize less resin such that they are lighter in weight than conventional bottles.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Plastic containers have been used as a replacement for glass or metal containers in the packaging of beverages for several decades. The most common plastic used in making beverage containers today is PET. Containers made of PET are transparent, thin-walled, and have the ability to maintain their shape by withstanding the force exerted on the walls of the container by their contents. PET resins are also reasonably priced and easy to process. PET bottles are generally made by a process that includes the blow-molding of plastic preforms which have been made by injection molding of the PET resin.


Advantages of plastic packaging include lighter weight and decreased breakage as compared to glass, and lower costs overall when taking both production and transportation into account. Although plastic packaging is lighter in weight than glass, there is still great interest in creating the lightest possible plastic packaging so as to maximize the cost savings in both transportation and manufacturing by making and using containers that contain less plastic.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A new approach which relies on a general change in preform design has been invented, which significantly improves the ability to blow efficient, lightweight bottles. The design elegantly incorporates features for protecting critical dimensions of the bottle and stabilizing the production blowing process. These features may also utilize less resin while achieving suitable mechanical performance resulting in a reduction in the use of petroleum products by the industry.


In accordance with embodiments disclosed herein, there is provided a plastic preform suitable for forming a bottle, and a bottle or container made from such a preform. The preform comprises a neck portion adapted to engage a closure and including a support ring at its lowermost point, the neck portion having a first wall thickness, and an elongated body portion including a generally cylindrical wall portion and an end cap. In some embodiments, the upper segment of the body portion adjacent to the support ring has a second wall thickness substantially similar to the first wall thickness and less than a third wall thickness in a lower segment of the body portion. Further embodiments may include one or more of the following features: the second wall thickness is about 25% to about 40% of the third wall thickness; the second wall thickness is about 25% to about 30% of the third wall thickness; the second wall thickness is about 0.7 mm to about 0.8 mm; an axial length of the upper segment is about 25% or more of an axial length of the neck portion; and/or an axial length of the upper segment is about 25% to about 35% of an axial length of the neck portion. In other embodiments, the second wall thickness is thicker or thinner than the first wall thickness by 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, or 0.4 mm. Containers or bottles made from such preforms are also disclosed herein.


In accordance with embodiments disclosed herein, there is provided a plastic preform, comprising a neck portion often including a support ring, wherein the neck portion has a first wall thickness, and a body portion including an elongated cylindrical wall having upper, middle and lower segments, wherein the middle segment has a second wall thickness and the lower segment of the body portion includes an end cap. In some embodiments, the upper segment of the body portion has a wall thickness substantially similar to the first wall thickness and less than the second wall thickness and/or the axial length of the upper segment is about 25% or more of the axial length of the neck portion. Further embodiments may include one or more of the following features: the upper segment wall thickness is about 25% to about 40% of the second wall thickness; the upper segment wall thickness is about 25% to about 30% of the second wall thickness; the upper segment wall thickness is about 0.7 mm to about 0.8 mm; and/or an axial length of the upper segment is about 25% to about 35% of an axial length of the neck portion. In other embodiments, the upper segment wall thickness is thicker or thinner than the first wall thickness by 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, or 0.4 mm. Containers or bottles made from such preforms are also disclosed herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a preform suitable for being blow molded to form a bottle.



FIG. 2A is a cross section of a preform without an extended lightweight finish.



FIG. 2B is a cross section of another preform without an extended lightweight finish.



FIG. 2C is a cross section of a preform according to one embodiment disclosed herein.



FIG. 3 is a cross-section of a preform in the cavity of a blow molding apparatus of the type that may be used to make a bottle or container.



FIG. 4 is a bottle or container.



FIG. 5A is a micro-CT slice of the neck and upper body of a preform as in FIG. 2A.



FIG. 5B is a micro-CT slice of the neck and upper body of a preform such as in FIG. 2C.



FIG. 6 is a superimposition of micro-CT slices of a preform as in FIG. 5B and a bottle blown therefrom.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Disclosed herein are articles, including preforms and containers, which utilize less plastic in their construction while maintaining the ease of processing and excellent structural properties associated with current commercial designs.


Referring to FIG. 1, a preform 30 is depicted. The preform is preferably made of material approved for contact with food and beverages such as virgin PET and can be of any of a wide variety of shapes and sizes. The preform shown in FIG. 1 is of the type which will form a 12-16 oz. beverage bottle, but as will be understood by those skilled in the art, other preform configurations can be used depending upon the desired configuration, characteristics and use of the final article. The preform 30 may be made by injection molding methods including those that are well known in the art.


Referring to FIG. 2A, a cross-section of a preform 30 is depicted. The preform 30 has a neck portion 32 and a body portion 34, formed monolithically (i.e., as a single, or unitary, structure). Advantageously, the monolithic arrangement of the preform, when blow-molded into a bottle, provides greater dimensional stability and improved physical properties in comparison to a preform constructed of separate neck and body portions, which are bonded together.


The neck portion 32 begins at the opening 36 to the interior of the preform 30 and extends to and includes the support ring 38. The neck portion 32 is further characterized by the presence of a structure for engaging a closure. In the illustrated embodiment, the structure includes threads 40, which provide a means to fasten a cap to the bottle produced from the preform 30. The illustrated preform has a shorter overall neck area than most conventional preforms, which shorter neck area may also be thinner than in conventional preforms. The thickness of the neck area 52A is measured at the very top or between the threads or any other protruding structures. The body portion 34 is an elongated structure extending down from the neck portion 32 and culminating in the end cap 42. In some embodiments the body portion is generally cylindrical, and the end cap is conical or frustoconical and may also be hemispherical, and the very terminus of the end cap may be flattened or rounded. The preform wall thickness 44 through most of the body portion will depend upon the overall size of the preform 30 and the wall thickness and overall size of the resulting container. The preform wall thickness between 48A and 50A is slightly thinner than the wall thickness throughout the straight portion of the body portion, both of which are thicker than at 46A immediately below the support ring 38. A slight taper often below 0.01 mm may also be found from 50A to 44 to help with release of the injected preform from the core during processing.



FIG. 2B illustrates a cross-section of another embodiment of a prior art preform. The preform has a neck portion and a body portion. The neck portion of the preform is of an axial length as may be found in conventional preforms. Although the thickness of the upper segment or portion of the body portion 46B is of a similar thickness as the neck portion 52B, it is also substantially similar thickness or the same thickness as the remainder of the body portion of the preform (e.g. 44B, 50B). In contrast to the preform in FIG. 2B, the preform in 2C is substantially thicker in the middle segment (e.g. 44C) of the body and in the end cap 42 than in the upper segment (e.g. 46C) of the body portion, which is of a similar thickness or same thickness as the neck portion 52C. In other embodiments, the upper segment of the body portion (e.g. 46C) may be thinner than the neck portion 52C.


In contrast to that illustrated in FIG. 2A, the preform illustrated in FIG. 2C has a reduced thickness in the upper portion of the body portion of the preform below the support ring 38, in that point 46C is substantially thinner than the corresponding location 46A in the prior art preform, 48C is of similar thickness to 46C which is much thinner than 48A of the prior art preform, and the thickness increases from point 48C to 50C, where it transitions into the straight portion of the preform having a thickness 44. Preforms and containers blown from such preforms having such a thinned area at the uppermost portion of the body portion are sometimes referred to herein as having an “extended finish”. A further illustration of this difference, in accordance with one embodiment, can be seen in FIG. 5A and FIG. 5C. The preform illustrated in FIG. 2C also has a shorter overall neck area than most conventional preforms, wherein the shorter neck area may also be thinner than in conventional preforms.


As compared to the prior art preform in FIG. 2A, the thickness at 46C is about 20-50% of the thickness at 46A, the thickness at 48C is about 20-60% of the thickness at 48A, and the thickness at 50C is about 80-100% of the thickness at 50A. In one embodiment, the thicknesses of 46C and 48C differ by less than about 20%, including less than about 10%, or they are substantially the same thickness. As an example, for a preform used to form an 8 oz. bottle, the thickness at 46C is about 0.7 mm, the thickness at 48C is about 0.8, and the thickness at 50C is about 2 mm. By means of comparison, for the prior art preform used to form an 8 oz. bottle, the thickness at 46A is about 1.5 mm the thickness at 48A is about 2 mm, and the thickness at 50A is about 2.5 mm. As another example, for a preform used to form a 16.9 oz. bottle, the thickness at 46C is about 0.7 mm, the thickness at 48C is about 1 mm, and the thickness at 50C is about 2.4 mm, compared to about 1.2 at 46A, about 1.8 mm at 48A, and about 2.4 mm at 50A in a prior art preform. As another example, for a preform used to form a 33.8 oz. bottle, the thickness at 46C is about 0.75, the thickness at 48C is about 1 mm, and the thickness at 50C is about 2.6 mm, compared to about 1.5 at 46A, about 1.9 mm at 48A, and about 2.7 mm at 50A in a prior art preform. The total weight of a preform used to form an 8 oz bottle according to FIG. 2C is about 7 grams as compared to about 12.5 grams for a preform according to FIG. 2A. The total weight of a preform used to form a 16.9 oz bottle according to FIG. 2C is about 8.5 grams as compared to about 9.2 grams for a preform according to FIG. 2A. The total weight of a preform used to form a 33.8 oz bottle according to FIG. 2C is about 18.3 grains as compared to about 26 grams for a preform according to FIG. 2A. Using the information provided herein, one skilled in the art can prepare other sizes of preforms that have similar characteristics to those described herein. Also, the dimensions in other useful embodiments of preforms may vary from the above-stated dimensions by 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, 0.4 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.6 mm, 0.7 mm, 0.8 mm, 0.9 mm or 1 mm.


In accordance with certain embodiments, the upper segment of the body portion of the preform, which is adjacent to the support ring, has a thickness that is substantially similar to the thickness 52C of the neck. In some such embodiments, the thicknesses of the upper segment and the neck may differ by +/−0 mm, 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, or 0.4 mm. In some such embodiments, the thicknesses of the upper segment and the neck may differ by up to 10%, up to 20%, or up to 30%. Accordingly, the thickness of the upper segment of the body portion of the preform may be substantially the same thickness, or it may be either thicker or thinner than the neck 52C. In accordance with other embodiments, the thickness of the upper segment of the body portion of the preform is less than that of a middle or lower segment of the body portion. In some such embodiments, the wall thickness of the upper section is about 10% to about 40% of the thickness of the lower and/or middle section of the body, including about 15% to about 40%, about 15% to about 30%, about 25% to about 35%, about 20% to about 35%, about 20% to about 30%, including about 12%, about 13%, about 17%, about 19%, about 22%, about 24%, about 27%, about 29%, about 31%, and about 33%, including ranges bordered and including the foregoing values. In some such embodiments, the wall thickness of the upper segment of the body is about 0.3 mm to about 0.9 mm, including about 0.3 mm to about 0.5 mm, about 0.4 mm to about 0.7 mm, about 0.5 mm to about 0.9 mm, about 0.7 mm to about 0.8 mm, including about 0.35 mm, about 0.45 mm, about 0.55 mm, about 0.65 mm, about 0.75 mm, and about 0.85 mm, including ranges bordered and including the foregoing values. In accordance with other embodiments, the axial length of the upper segment measures about 20% or more, including about 25% or more of the axial length of the neck portion, including about 20% to about 30%, about 20% to about 35%, about 25% to about 30%, and about 25% to about 35% of the axial length of the neck portion. Preforms may include one or more or all of the features described above.


After a preform, such as that depicted in FIG. 2A, 2B or 2C, is prepared by injection molding; it is subjected to a stretch blow-molding process. Referring to FIG. 3, in this process a preform 50 is placed in a mold 80 having a cavity corresponding to the desired container shape. The preform is then heated and expanded by stretching such as by a stretch rod inserted into the center of the preform to push it to the end of the mold and by air forced into the interior of the preform 50 to fill the cavity within the mold 80, creating a container 82. The blow molding operation normally is restricted to the body portion 34 of the preform with the neck portion 32, including the support ring, retaining the original configuration as in the preform.


When performing the stretch blow molding process to create the container, preforms are conventionally loaded onto a spindle which engages the inner wall of the neck portion of the preform and facilitates transporting the preform into and through the stretch blow molding machinery. Because of the extended neck finish in accordance with embodiments described herein, it may be beneficial to have the spindle extend into the inner wall of the preform into the region of the upper segment of the body portion, beyond the neck portion. In some embodiments, the spindle loads into the preform the full extent of the extended neck finish. This may be accomplished by adjusting the depth to which the spindle loads and/or by changing the spindle to have sufficient length to extend the greater distance. The extended spindle loading depth helps to maintain the dimensions of the extended neck finish, especially in those embodiments where the extended neck finish is relatively thin such that the dimensional stability of the lower part of the extended neck finish and/or the lower part of the upper segment of the body portion would otherwise be at risk due to exposure to heating elements and/or elevated temperatures in other portions of the body during the stretch blow molding process.


Referring to FIG. 4, there is disclosed an embodiment of container 82 in accordance with a preferred embodiment, such as that which might be made from blow molding the preform 50 of FIG. 2A, 2B or 2C. The container 82 has a neck portion 32 and a body portion 34 corresponding to the neck and body portions of the preform 50 of FIG. 3. The neck portion 32 is further characterized by the presence of the threads 40 or other closure engagement means that provides a way to fasten a cap onto the container.


In preforms having neck finishes that are lighter in weight and portions immediately below the finish (uppermost portion of the body), such as those described herein, the lighter weight portions are more susceptible to damage or softening from the heat supplied to the remainder of the preform during blow molding. Aggressive cooling of the finish was seen as a way to enable light weighting. Since not all machines cool identically or as effectively, it was observed that to properly blow the bottle, the finish would go through distortion. A short term solution to prevent distorting the finish was to limit heating of the preform below the support ledge. This left plastic from the preform in the neck of the bottle. This is referred to a “ring” in the neck. While unattractive and inefficient from a resin use perspective, such a decision allowed the light weight preform to continue to produce acceptable bottles.


Thus, a concept was conceived where the material normally placed in the preform to be stretched from directly below the support ledge was removed and replaced with a wall thickness at the desired dimensions of the finished product. The distance of this bottle “neck” was set by the bottle design, but the new extended finish concept allows for some heating and stretching. By definition the design change also provides for a transition from fully blown bottle to rigidly retained threads across this zone. An extended finish is especially useful in smaller finishes that are substantially shorter from the support ring to the top of the finish as compared to prior finishes that have considerable distance (up to 10 mm) from the threads to the base of the support ledge/ring. Such shorter finishes may also be thinner. This new design was also discouraged because having a thin area upstream of a thicker threaded area in an injection mold would be difficult, if not impossible, to mold properly since it would likely prevent resin from completely filling the neck finish under usual injection pressures. Thus injection limitations have historically limited this approach rather than mechanical performance. Accordingly, in some embodiments, during the injection molding process, the closing of the neck ring can be slightly delayed to allow filling of the small spaces before clamping it down to mold at least the neck and finish. Minimal experimentation is needed to determine the correct timing and amount of polymer melt to ensure complete filling of the neck and finish while minimizing flashing.


In addition to providing lighter weight preforms and bottles, the extended finish preforms disclosed herein, which may incorporate other lightweighting features described herein such as a shorter and/or thinner neck and/or thinner walls in the body portion, can also have the advantage of being produced using a lower cycle time in molding. Lower cycle time increases the number of preforms that can be made by a single piece of equipment in a day and can lower the total energy needed to produce a single preform, resulting in additional cost savings to the manufacturer.


It was also generally thought that a thicker support ledge and larger amounts of plastic near that region (above in the finish and below at the uppermost portion of the body) was needed to absorb heat and prevent it from transferring into the finish. This has also been shown by the present applicant to be incorrect. It has been found that the thick ring of plastic provides heat storage and serves as a heat source during later bottle handling and processing steps. Thinning the region below the support ledge, under this new perspective, provides resistance to heat travelling up to the finish in that this area can rapidly cool so that it is not a latent heat source during later operations. Since, in certain embodiments, this region does not need to be stretched during blow molding, it does not need to be heated and the blow-molding procedure and apparatus may be adjusted such that the uppermost portion or upper segment of the preform/container body (in the area of the extended finish) is not heated, or heated very little as compared to the bulk of the body of the preform, as part the blow molding process. This change is easy to accommodate in modern equipment and makes the production process easier and more stable. For example, the position of the cooling rail or shims may be adjusted to provide greater protection from heat for the extended finish, the intensity of the heating element(s) may be adjusted, and/or the position of the heating element(s) may be adjusted. It should be noted that preforms having an extended finish may be blow molded in conventional processes that actively heat the lower portion of the extended finish (i.e. the uppermost portion of the body), but such processes are generally less effective in creating consistently stable bottles during production.


The applicant has discovered that when the preform of FIG. 2A is blown to form a bottle in a process that protects the extended finish from heating during blow molding as described above, the thickness at 46A and 48A changes very little, with essentially all of the wall portion of the bottle being formed from the stretching of the wall around 50A and below. This is shown in FIG. 6 which presents a superimposition of cross sections of a preform having an extended finish and a bottle blown therefrom. Accordingly, the wall thickness at the lower segment of the neck portion of the preform, including at 46C and 48C, is lessened as described hereinabove to reduce the amount of material needed to form the preform while still maintaining the necessary degree of structural integrity to allow for ease in blow molding to form a container that has sufficient mechanical strength to withstand the forces exerted on it during formation, filling, transportation and use.


In accordance with some embodiments herein, the width of the support ring/ledge is increased as compared to that in a standard shorter finish. Given that a 0.6 mm width to the support ledge (as in a standard shorter finish) provides forces upon a finger that are considered to be within the pain threshold for a finger, increasing the width will provide greater comfort for the consumer. Accordingly a width of at least about 1 mm, 1.2 mm, 1.4 mm, 1.6 mm, 1.8 mm, 2 mm, 2.2 mm, 2.4 mm, 2.6 mm or greater would provide greater comfort to the consumer when opening the closure. Alternatively or concomitantly, changes may be made to the cap including by increasing the apparent cap diameter such as by providing ribs on the tamper ring that are of greater height than the remaining cap. Other reasons to widen the ledge include conveyor handling, heat sink properties of the ledge, better feel when opening the container, greater resistance to damage during processing and transport. It should be noted that increasing the width of the support ledge is counter to lightweighting, such that it should be balanced with other considerations when designing a preform and container.


In other embodiments in which it is desired for the container to be heat-set, it is preferred that the containers be blow-molded in accordance with processes generally known for heat set blow-molding, including, but not limited to, those which involve orienting and heating in the mold, and those which involve steps of blowing, relaxing and reblowing. The mold 80 can quickly cool the container during this process, especially with high heat transfer material absorbing heat from the container at a high rate.


In some embodiments, the blow mold can be used to produce crystalline neck finishes. For example, the neck portion of the blow mold and the body portion of the blow mold can selectively control the temperature of the preform/container to achieve a desired amount of crystallization. Thus, the neck portion of the preform/container can be heated and gradually reduced in temperature to produce a desired amount of crystalline material.


In some embodiments for preforms in which the neck finish is formed primarily of PET, the preform is heated to a temperature of preferably 80° C. to 120° C., with higher temperatures being preferred for the heat-set embodiments, and given a brief period of time to equilibrate. After equilibration, it is stretched to a length approximating the length of the final container. Following the stretching, pressurized air, such as chilled food grade air, is forced into the preform which acts to expand the walls of the preform to fit the mold in which it rests, thus creating the container. Fluid is circulated through the mold and rapidly cools the container contacting the interior surface. The temperature of the chilled air for stretching the preform and the temperature of the fluid cooling the mold can be selected based on the desired container finish, production time, and the like.


The articles described herein may be made from any suitable thermoplastic material, such as polyesters including polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyolefins, including polypropylene and polyethylene, polycarbonate, polyamides, including nylons (e.g. Nylon 6, Nylon 66, MXD6), polystyrenes, epoxies, acrylics, copolymers, blends, grafted polymers, and/or modified polymers (monomers or portion thereof having another group as a side group, e.g. olefin-modified polyesters). These materials may be used alone or in conjunction with each other. More specific material examples include, but are not limited to, ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (“EVOH”), ethylene vinyl acetate (“EVA”), ethylene acrylic acid (“EAA”), linear low density polyethylene (“LLDPE”), polyethylene 2,6- and 1,5-naphthalate (PEN), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), poly(cyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate), polystryrene, cycloolefin, copolymer, poly-4-methylpentene-1, poly(methyl methacrylate), acrylonitrile, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidine chloride, styrene acrylonitrile, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, polyacetal, polybutylene terephthalate, ionomer, polysulfone, polytetra-fluoroethylene, polytetramethylene 1,2-dioxybenzoate and copolymers of ethylene terephthalate and ethylene isophthalate. In certain embodiments preferred materials may be virgin, pre-consumer, post-consumer, regrind, recycled, and/or combinations thereof.


In some embodiments polypropylene also refers to clarified polypropylene. As used herein, the term “clarified polypropylene” is a broad term and is used in accordance with its ordinary meaning and may include, without limitation, a polypropylene that includes nucleation inhibitors and/or clarifying additives. Clarified polypropylene is a generally transparent material as compared to the homopolymer or block copolymer of polypropylene. The inclusion of nucleation inhibitors helps prevent and/or reduce crystallinity, which contributes to the haziness of polypropylene, within the polypropylene. Clarified polypropylene may be purchased from various sources such as Dow Chemical Co. Alternatively, nucleation inhibitors may be added to polypropylene.


As used herein, “PET” includes, but is not limited to, modified PET as well as PET blended with other materials. One example of a modified PET is IPA-modified PET, which refers to PET in which the IPA content is preferably more than about 2% by weight, including about 2-10% IPA by weight, also including about 5-10% IPA by weight. In another modified PET, an additional comonomer, cylohexane dimethanol (CHDM) is added in significant amounts (e.g. approximately 40% by weight or more) to the PET mixture during manufacture of the resin.


Additives may be included in articles herein to provide functional properties to the resulting containers. Such additives include those providing enhanced gas barrier, UV protection, scuff resistance, impact resistance and/or chemical resistance. Preferred additives may be prepared by methods known to those of skill in the art. For example, the additives may be mixed directly with a particular material, or they may be dissolved/dispersed separately and then added to a particular material. Additives are preferably present in an amount up to about 40% of the material, also including up to about 30%, 20%, 10%, 5%, 2% and 0.1% by weight of the material. In other embodiments, additives are preferably present in an amount less than or equal to 1% by weight, preferred ranges of materials include, but are not limited to, about 0.01% to about 1%, about 0.01% to about 0.1%, and about 0.1% to about 1% by weight.


Another possible additive is microparticulate clay or graphene based materials. These materials comprise tiny, micron or sub-micron size (diameter), particles of materials which enhance the barrier and/or mechanical properties of a material by creating a more tortuous path for migrating gas molecules, e.g. oxygen or carbon dioxide, to take as they permeate a material and/or providing added stiffness. In preferred embodiments nanoparticulate material is present in amounts ranging from 0.05 to 1% by weight, including 0.1%, 0.5% by weight and ranges encompassing these amounts. One preferred microparticulate clay based product is Cloisite® available from Southern Clay Products. In certain embodiments preferred nanoparticles comprise monmorillonite that may be modified with a ternary or quaternary ammonium salt. In further embodiments, such particles comprise organoclays as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,376, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and forms part of the disclosure of this application. Other suitable organic and inorganic microparticulate clay based or nano-sized products may also be used. Both man-made and natural products are also suitable.


In some embodiments, the UV protection properties of the material may be enhanced by the addition of one or more additives. In a preferred embodiment, the UV protection material used provides UV protection up to about 350 nm or less, preferably about 370 nm or less, more preferably about 400 nm or less. The UV protection material may be used as an additive with layers providing additional functionality or applied separately as a single layer. Preferably additives providing enhanced UV protection are present in the material from about 0.05 to 20% by weight, but also including about 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 5%, 10%, and 15% by weight, and ranges encompassing these amounts. Preferably the UV protection material is added in a form that is compatible with the other materials. In some embodiments, a preferred UV protection material comprises a polymer grafted or modified with a UV absorber that is added as a concentrate. Other preferred UV protection materials include, but are not limited to, benzotriazoles, phenothiazines, and azaphenothiazines. UV protection materials may be added during the melt phase process prior to use, e.g. prior to injection molding or extrusion. Suitable UV protection materials are available from Milliken, Ciba and Clariant.


Although the present invention has been described herein in terms of certain preferred embodiments, and certain exemplary methods, it is to be understood that the scope of the invention is not to be limited thereby. Instead, Applicant intends that variations on the methods and materials disclosed herein which are apparent to those of skill in the art will fall within the scope of Applicant's invention.

Claims
  • 1. A plastic preform formed monolithically, suitable for forming a bottle, the preform comprising: a neck portion adapted to engage a closure and including a plurality of threads, the neck portion having a neck wall thickness and a neck inner diameter; andan elongated body portion including a cylindrical wall portion and an end cap, wherein a first upper segment of the elongated body portion has an inner diameter equal to the neck inner diameter and a wall thickness equal to the neck wall thickness,a second upper segment of the body portion disposed adjacently below the first upper segment extends farther along the elongated body than the first upper segment, anda third segment of the body portion disposed adjacently below the second upper segment of the body portion has a wall thickness greater than the neck wall thickness and an inner diameter smaller than the neck inner diameter, andwherein the first upper segment wall thickness is about 0.2 mm to about 0.9 mm.
  • 2. The plastic preform of claim 1, wherein a portion of the first upper segment wall thickness is about 10% to about 40% of the wall thickness of the third segment.
  • 3. The plastic preform of claim 1, wherein a portion of the first upper segment wall thickness is about 25% to about 30% of the wall thickness of the third segment.
  • 4. The plastic preform of claim 1, wherein a portion of the first upper segment wall thickness is about 0.7 mm to about 0.8 mm.
  • 5. The plastic preform of claim 1, wherein an axial length of the first upper segment is about 25% or more of an axial length of the neck portion.
  • 6. The plastic preform of claim 1, wherein an axial length of the first upper segment is about 25% to about 35% of an axial length of the neck portion.
  • 7. A bottle or container made from a preform according to claim 1.
RELATED APPLICATION INFORMATION

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/295,699, filed on Nov. 14, 2011 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/413,167, filed on Nov. 12, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (227)
Number Name Date Kind
D63015 Carlton Mar 1867 S
3029963 Evers Apr 1962 A
3438578 Moyer et al. Apr 1969 A
D252530 Budish Jul 1979 S
4316551 Belokin, Jr. Feb 1982 A
4374878 Jakobsen Feb 1983 A
D294462 Ota et al. Mar 1988 S
4756439 Perock Jul 1988 A
4818213 Roy Apr 1989 A
4818575 Hirata et al. Apr 1989 A
4847129 Collette Jul 1989 A
4863046 Collette et al. Sep 1989 A
4907709 Abe et al. Mar 1990 A
4927680 Collette et al. May 1990 A
4948001 Magly Aug 1990 A
D315869 Collette Apr 1991 S
D321830 York et al. Nov 1991 S
5067622 Garver et al. Nov 1991 A
5092475 Krishnamumar et al. Mar 1992 A
5133468 Brunson et al. Jul 1992 A
5178289 Krishnamkumar et al. Jan 1993 A
5199588 Hayashi Apr 1993 A
5255889 Collette et al. Oct 1993 A
5279433 Krishnakumar et al. Jan 1994 A
5281387 Collette et al. Jan 1994 A
D345693 Edstrom Apr 1994 S
5303833 Hayashi et al. Apr 1994 A
5303834 Krishnakumar et al. Apr 1994 A
5337909 Vailliencourt Aug 1994 A
5341946 Vailliencourt et al. Aug 1994 A
D352238 Vailliencourt et al. Nov 1994 S
D352245 Krishnakumar et al. Nov 1994 S
5366774 Pinto et al. Nov 1994 A
5381910 Sigiura et al. Jan 1995 A
5407086 Ota et al. Apr 1995 A
D358766 Vailliencourt et al. May 1995 S
5411699 Collette et al. May 1995 A
D364565 Vailliencourt et al. Nov 1995 S
D366416 Semersky Jan 1996 S
D366417 Semersky Jan 1996 S
5632397 Fandeux et al. May 1997 A
5645183 Slat et al. Jul 1997 A
5669520 Simpson Sep 1997 A
5704503 Krishnakumar et al. Jan 1998 A
D391168 Ogg Feb 1998 S
D393802 Collette et al. Apr 1998 S
5762221 Tobias et al. Jun 1998 A
D397614 Krishnakumar et al. Sep 1998 S
D402895 Takahashi et al. Dec 1998 S
D404308 Takahashi et al. Jan 1999 S
5888598 Brewster et al. Mar 1999 A
D407649 McCallister et al. Apr 1999 S
D407650 Takahashi et al. Apr 1999 S
D411453 Piccioli et al. Jun 1999 S
5908128 Krishnakumar et al. Jun 1999 A
D413519 Eberle et al. Sep 1999 S
5971184 Krishnakumar et al. Oct 1999 A
5988417 Cheng et al. Nov 1999 A
6016932 Gaydosh et al. Jan 2000 A
D419882 Bretz et al. Feb 2000 S
D420592 Bretz et al. Feb 2000 S
6036037 Scheffer et al. Mar 2000 A
D423365 Eberle Apr 2000 S
6044996 Carew et al. Apr 2000 A
6044997 Ogg Apr 2000 A
6062409 Eberle May 2000 A
D426460 Krishnakumar et al. Jun 2000 S
D427905 Eberle Jul 2000 S
6092688 Eberle Jul 2000 A
D429647 Warner et al. Aug 2000 S
D430493 Weick Sep 2000 S
6112925 Nahill et al. Sep 2000 A
D434330 Rowe et al. Nov 2000 S
D440157 Lichtman et al. Apr 2001 S
D440158 Bretz et al. Apr 2001 S
D440877 Lichtman et al. Apr 2001 S
D441294 Lichtman et al. May 2001 S
6230912 Rashid May 2001 B1
6248413 Barel et al. Jun 2001 B1
D445033 Bretz et al. Jul 2001 S
6257433 Ogg et al. Jul 2001 B1
D446126 Bretz et al. Aug 2001 S
D447411 Lichtman et al. Sep 2001 S
6296131 Rashid Oct 2001 B2
6347717 Eberle Feb 2002 B1
D454500 Bretz et al. Mar 2002 S
D465158 Peek et al. Nov 2002 S
D466021 Thierjung Nov 2002 S
D466819 Darr et al. Dec 2002 S
6494333 Sasaki et al. Dec 2002 B2
D469358 Bryant et al. Jan 2003 S
D469359 Bryant et al. Jan 2003 S
D469695 Bryant et al. Feb 2003 S
D469696 Bryant et al. Feb 2003 S
D470773 Darr et al. Feb 2003 S
D472470 Bretz et al. Apr 2003 S
6554146 DeGroff et al. Apr 2003 B1
D476236 Ungrady et al. Jun 2003 S
6585125 Peek Jul 2003 B1
D479690 DeGroff Sep 2003 S
6616001 Saito et al. Sep 2003 B2
D480957 Mooney et al. Oct 2003 S
D485765 Thieriung et al. Jan 2004 S
6682794 Horn et al. Jan 2004 B1
6722514 Renz Apr 2004 B2
6739467 Saito et al. May 2004 B2
D494475 Thierjung et al. Aug 2004 S
D497551 Gamel et al. Oct 2004 S
6830158 Yourist Dec 2004 B2
6841262 Beck et al. Jan 2005 B1
D502108 Gamel et al. Feb 2005 S
D503625 Nelson et al. Apr 2005 S
D503885 Bretz et al. Apr 2005 S
D504063 Bretz et al. Apr 2005 S
D506675 Bretz et al. Jun 2005 S
D506676 Bretz et al. Jun 2005 S
D506677 Bretz et al. Jun 2005 S
D507491 Bretz et al. Jul 2005 S
D507609 Bretz et al. Jul 2005 S
D507749 Bretz et al. Jul 2005 S
D508857 Bretz et al. Aug 2005 S
6932230 Pedmo et al. Aug 2005 B2
D510526 Bretz et al. Oct 2005 S
7025219 Heisner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7032770 Finlay et al. Apr 2006 B2
7033656 Nahil et al. Apr 2006 B2
D525530 Livingston et al. Jul 2006 S
D527643 Gottlieb Sep 2006 S
7172087 Axe et al. Feb 2007 B1
D538660 Gatewood Mar 2007 S
7198164 Yourist et al. Apr 2007 B2
D548106 Martinez et al. Aug 2007 S
7258244 Ungrady Aug 2007 B2
D551081 Ohara et al. Sep 2007 S
7267242 Tanaka et al. Sep 2007 B2
D555499 Ross Nov 2007 S
7334695 Bysick et al. Feb 2008 B2
7334696 Tanaka et al. Feb 2008 B2
7347339 Bangi et al. Mar 2008 B2
7364046 Joshi et al. Apr 2008 B2
7416089 Kraft et al. Aug 2008 B2
7416090 Mooney et al. Aug 2008 B2
D579339 Shmagin Oct 2008 S
7451886 Lisch et al. Nov 2008 B2
D584627 Lepoitevin Jan 2009 S
D598779 Lepoitevin Aug 2009 S
D610015 Yourist et al. Feb 2010 S
7694842 Melrose Apr 2010 B2
7699183 Matsuoka et al. Apr 2010 B2
7748551 Gatewood et al. Jul 2010 B2
7748552 Livingston et al. Jul 2010 B2
7757874 Ross Jul 2010 B2
D621271 Soni Aug 2010 S
7780025 Simpson, Jr. et al. Aug 2010 B2
D623529 Yourist et al. Sep 2010 S
D624427 Yourist et al. Sep 2010 S
7798349 Maczek et al. Sep 2010 B2
D630515 Bretz et al. Jan 2011 S
7861876 Stowitts Jan 2011 B2
7927678 Mitadera Apr 2011 B2
7980404 Trude et al. Jul 2011 B2
8020717 Patel Sep 2011 B2
8047388 Kelley et al. Nov 2011 B2
8091720 Colloud Jan 2012 B2
8308007 Mast et al. Nov 2012 B2
8328033 Mast Dec 2012 B2
8381496 Trude et al. Feb 2013 B2
8728601 Hutts et al. May 2014 B2
8956707 Hanan Feb 2015 B2
10118724 Hanan Nov 2018 B2
10329043 Hanan Jun 2019 B2
10647465 Hanan May 2020 B2
10829260 Hanan Nov 2020 B2
20010030166 Ozawa et al. Oct 2001 A1
20040000533 Kamineni et al. Jan 2004 A1
20050279728 Finlay et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060065992 Hutchinson Mar 2006 A1
20060070977 Howell et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060113274 Keller et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060131257 Gatewood et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060157439 Howell Jul 2006 A1
20060255235 Meyer et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070131644 Melrose Jun 2007 A1
20070210026 Darr et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080087628 Bangi et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080257855 Patel Oct 2008 A1
20090020497 Tanaka et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090065468 Hata et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090159556 Patcheak et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090166314 Matsouka Jul 2009 A1
20090184127 Mooney Jul 2009 A1
20090188888 Penny Jul 2009 A1
20090261058 Pritchett, Jr. Oct 2009 A1
20090261059 Pritchett, Jr. Oct 2009 A1
20090266785 Siegl Oct 2009 A1
20090283495 Lane et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090321383 Lane Dec 2009 A1
20100028577 Siegl Feb 2010 A1
20100089865 Oguchi et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100163513 Pedmo Jul 2010 A1
20100176081 Kamineni et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100206838 Mast et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100206839 Tanaka et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100206892 Mast Aug 2010 A1
20100213204 Melrose Aug 2010 A1
20100286837 Deemer et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100023378 Ratnam Sep 2010 A1
20100270259 Russell et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100304168 Dornbach Dec 2010 A1
20100304169 Dornbach Dec 2010 A1
20100314348 Zoppas et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100320218 Tanaka Dec 2010 A1
20110008560 Dabbous Jan 2011 A1
20110017700 Patcheak et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110073559 Schlies et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110115135 Siegl May 2011 A1
20120027966 Barel et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120031870 Porter et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120231191 Siegl Sep 2012 A1
20120248003 Hunter et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120263902 Hanan Oct 2012 A1
20140190927 Lane Jul 2014 A1
20140346135 Melrose Nov 2014 A1
20150144587 Hanan May 2015 A1
20160176566 Hanan Jun 2016 A1
20160193750 Gaiotti et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160257029 Lane et al. Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
1473102 Feb 2004 CN
0199576 Oct 1986 EP
2325091 May 2011 EP
2 846 946 May 2004 FR
2899204 Oct 2007 FR
S62164504 Jul 1987 JP
7 164436 Jun 1995 JP
09240647 Sep 1997 JP
10029614 Feb 1998 JP
2004 090425 Mar 2004 JP
2008 189721 Aug 2008 JP
2009 045877 Mar 2009 JP
2013510015 Mar 2013 JP
2015182789 Oct 2015 JP
H0848321 Oct 2015 JP
20040050926 Jun 2004 KR
WO 2004080828 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2006005413 Jan 2006 WO
WO 2006027092 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2007033722 Mar 2007 WO
WO 2007124894 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2011160748 Dec 2011 WO
WO 2012095285 Jul 2012 WO
WO 2012156048 Nov 2012 WO
WO2017035267 Mar 2017 WO
WO2017136584 Aug 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060587 dated Mar. 14, 2012 in 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT application No. PCT/US2012/067795 dated Mar. 13, 2013, by Detlef Meyer.
International Search Report with Written Opinion for related Application No. PCT/US2017/016269 dated Apr. 17, 2017 (6 Pages).
International Search Report with Written Opinion for related Application No. PCT/US2019/040586 dated Nov. 6, 2019 (11 Pages).
Examiner's Decision of Rejections from theJapanese Patent Office for related Application No. 2018-559683 dated Jan. 5, 2021 (4 Pages including the Statement of Relevance).
Office Action issued from the Indonesia patent Office for related Application N. P00201805779 dated Jan. 22, 2021 ( 3 Pages including the Statement of Relevance).
Office action issued from the European Patent Office for related Application No. 18190142.2 dated Jan. 27, 2021 (3 Pages).
Re-Examination Notification issued from the Chinese Patent Office for related Application No. 201710052177.X dated Feb. 22, 2021 (13 Pages including English Translation).
Second Office Action issued from the Chinese Patent Office for related Application No. 201810939013.3 dated Jan. 12, 2021 (11 Pages including English Translation).
Second Examination Report issued from the Australina Patent Office for related Application No. 2019232807 dated Feb. 4, 2021 (4 Pages).
An-Sofie Schoonjans et al, “Cardiovascular safety of low-dose fenfluramine in Dravet syndrome: a review of its benefit-risk profile in a new patient population”, Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 33, No. 10, Jul. 31, 2017, pp. 1773-1781.
An-Sofie Schoonjans, “Low-dose fenfluramine in the treatment of neurologic disorders: experience in Dravet syndrome”, Jan. 1, 2015 pp. 328-338,.
Jake Remaly, “Fenfluramine Reduces Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Dravet Syndrome | Epilepsy Resource Center”, Jan. 1, 2018 https://www.mdedge.com/neurology/epilepsyresourcecenter/article/153865/epilepsy-seizures/fenfluramine-reduces.
Brenot et al, “Primary pulmonary hypertension and fenfluramine use.”, Heart, vol. 70, No. 6, Dec. 1, 1993 (Dec. 1, 1993), p. 537-541.
Office action issued from the European Patent Office for related Application No. 21173419-9 dated Jul. 30, 2021 (11 Pages).
Examination Report issued from the Australian Patent Office for related Application No. 2017213829 dated Nov. 16, 2021 (5 Pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150122766 A1 May 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61413167 Nov 2010 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13295699 Nov 2011 US
Child 14590705 US