Preparation for restenosis prevention

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9066990
  • Patent Number
    9,066,990
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 13, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 30, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a preparation for restenosis prevention. The preparations for restenosis prevention known as yet do not reach sufficient active agent concentrations in the affected sections of the vascular walls as higher doses cause undesirable side effects. The present invention is a preparation to which at least one antihyperplastic agent is added that has a distribution ratio between butanol and water .gtoreq.0.5. The lipophilic active agent is absorbed by the vascular wall fast and in sufficient quantity. The preparation may be a liquid that can pass through capillaries and may contain a contrast agent so that the active agent is transferred into the vascular wall without any additional effort while the usually required contrast radiograms are taken. The preparation may also be applied to a catheter.
Description

The invention relates to a preparation for restenosis prevention and its application to an angiography catheter.


Stenoses of blood vessels are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Local stenoses or occlusions of larger vessels up to ca. 2 mm in diameter can be dilated back to their original lumen in many instances using inflatable balloon catheters. High pressures are applied when doing this, which may result in lacerations of the thickened vascular walls that are squeezed and displaced into the surrounding tissue. In some of these operations, tubular perforated metal supports (stents) are implanted to keep the vessels open. The vascular walls treated in this way frequently respond by increased growth in thickness that is similar to developing a scar within a few weeks and months. As a result and due to advancing arteriosclerosis, these vessels may relatively soon become stenosed again (restenosis). Restenosis is a severe medical problem that causes high costs.


A proven clinical method to prevent restenosis is irradiation of the affected vascular wall sections with a high dosage of X-rays (extracorporeal sources or intraluminal radioisotopes) immediately after the surgery.


Major disadvantages of irradiation are the required precautions when handling preventive radiation dosages. Many other methods for preventing premature restenosis have been tested in labs and clinical practice but as yet without any major breakthrough [Bult H. Restenosis: A challenge for pharmacology. Tips 21 pp. 274-279, 2000]. Good results were only achieved using drug-releasing stents. For this method to be effective, stents have to be implanted so that restenosis cannot be prevented when the vessel is just dilated and no stent is implanted.


Inhibition of mitosis, reactive vascular wall thickening and restenosis has been described for a great number of drugs: Important principles of action are inhibition of platelet aggregation, enzyme inhibition, inhibition of mitosis, cytostatics, and corticoids. Favorable results were achieved in vitro and partly in animal experiments but have not been confirmed in clinical tests. A frequent explanation offered is that active agent concentrations in the affected sections of the vascular wall are insufficient. This is particularly true for oral and intravenous administration where side effects prevent higher doses. As an alternative, administration using specific catheters was attempted wherein these catheters either press the drug solution through the pores of a tight-sitting balloon directly into the vascular wall or block supply and discharge in a vessel section and expose the vessel wall to the drug solution for some time [Herdeg, C., M. Oberhoff, D. I. Siegel-Axel, A. Baumbach, A. Blattner, A. Kuttner, S. Schroder, K. R. Karsch: Paclitaxel: Ein Chemotherapeutikum zur Restenoseprophylaxe? Experimentelle Untersuchungen in vitro and in vivo. Z Kardiol 89 pp. 390-397, 2000]. Drug exposure of previously dilated vessel sections that was effective over a longer period of time was achieved by the slow release of active agents from coated stents. However, the problem of achieving sufficient active agent concentrations over a sufficient exposure time in the vessel sections requiring treatment remains the same with all these methods. Hydrophilic active agents are quickly washed out of tissues [Baumbach, A., C. Herdeg, M. Kluge, M. Oberhoff, M. Lerch, K. K. Haase, C. Wolter, S. Schroder, K. R. Karsch: Local drug delivery: Impact of pressure, substance characteristics, and stenting on drug transfer into the arterial wall. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 47 pp. 102-106, 1999]. Repeated administration is impossible because of the invasive access using catheters. Lipophilic active agents do not dissolve well enough in vessel-compatible aqueous media or are kept in solution as micelles or liposomes; these micelles or liposomes are only slowly absorbed by the tissue. Administration using special catheters that interrupt the blood flow for some time or press the active agent solution under high pressure into the vascular wall first of all causes additional tissue damage and intensifies reactive hyperplasia.


Coated, drug-releasing stents are difficult to produce in constant quality, they contain only very low active agent quantities due to their light weight and delicate design and are not suitable for proximal and distal treatment of the vascular sections at risk of restenosis a few millimeters around the stent. If a stent was implanted at an earlier time, and there is stenosis in its lumen, this can be removed by inflating a balloon catheter. This implantation of a second stent into the lumen of the first stent to prevent vessel wall hyperplasia as a consequence of dilatation is undesirable so that there is no effective method of restenosis prevention for this case. The same applies when there is no indication for implanting a stent after angioplasty or when hyperplastic vessel processes are taking place without clear stenosis of the lumen so that neither vessel dilatation nor stent implantation are required. Some of these vessel wall changes may cause sudden, mostly thrombotic occlusions. In this case, too, a method independent of stent implantation for inhibiting pathological vessel wall changes is desirable.


Active agents that were tested with some success in laboratory settings are heparin and hirudin derivatives, prostacyclins, corticoids, rapamycin, colchicine, and paclitaxel.


In most cases, the active agents were applied to stents; whenever solutions were used, these were aqueous solutions or, for the poorly water-soluble paclitaxel (4,10-β-diacetoxy-13-α-((2R,3S)-3-ben-zamido-2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropionyloxy)-2α-benzoyloxy-5-β, 20-epoxy-1, 7-β-dihydroxy-11-taxene-9-one), aqueous solutions with an ethanol or cremophor additive. Micelles are formed when using cremophor [poly(oxyethylene)-35-castor oil] that can largely be avoided when using ethanol.


Suspensions or emulsions with relatively large-sized particles in aqueous cytostatic solutions with or without an added contrast agent have been described for direct injection into tumor-feeding blood vessels. These preparations are used to close tumor vessels and for simultaneous cytostatic treatment. Closing the vessels is directly opposed to the purpose of this invention.


It is the problem of this invention to provide agents for the local treatment of potentially hyperproliferative tissue that can be handled easily and do not harm the patient.


Based on the state of the art, this problem is solved according to the invention by a preparation containing at least one antihyperplastic agent with a distribution ratio between butanol and water of ≧0.5, and by inserting said preparation in an agent for enhancing the imaging of arteries and veins or by applying it to a catheter.


The concept of the invention is based on the observation that active agents from adequately concentrated solutions, gels or other matrices are absorbed fast and in sufficient quantities by a vessel wall unless they are enclosed in outwardly hydrophilic micelles by solubility promoters. When the active agents are lipophilic (butanol to aqueous buffer solution (pH 7) distribution ratio ≧0.5, preferably ≧1 and ≧5 particularly preferred, or octanol to aqueous buffer solution (pH 7) distribution ratio ≧1, preferably ≧10, and ≧50 particularly preferred), and/or reversibly (>10%, preferably >50%, >80% particularly preferred) and/or irreversibly bind to cell components (such as paclitaxel, probucol (4,4′-(isopropylidene-bisthio)bis(2,6-di-tert-butylphenol)), porphyrin derivatives), the retention time in the blood vessel when administered during vessel dilatation and optional stent implantation is sufficient for the treatment effect. Prevention or reduction of initial reactive hyperplasia as a consequence of vascular injury prevents the vessel wall from growing too thick over many months. Surprisingly, the preparations according to the invention did not require longer exposure of the tissue to be treated or indirect infiltration and additional injury of the vessel wall.


Contrast agents were selectively injected into the affected vessels several times during angioplasty and stent implantation to determine positioning, degree and form of the stenosis, to specify the exact position of the dilatation catheter, evaluate dilatation success, and, optionally, to implant a stent of appropriate thickness and length. By adding the active agents or their preparations that are suited for the purpose to the contrast agents used for diagnostic purposes, the active agent is transferred into the vascular wall with each injection of contrast agent, without additional effort or damage to the vessels. The entire vessel section imaged for diagnostic purposes is treated including the area in front of the stenosis and the area away from its center. This has the major benefit that critical zones upstream and downstream from the dilated stenosis and optional stent implantation are not excluded from treatment.


If the injection of contrast media is not required or undesirable, solutions of lipophilic active agents in other aqueous carriers can be used without adding micelle-forming substances. One requirement is that these solutions contain a higher active agent concentration than the saturation concentration in the aqueous medium. This can be achieved by adding organic solvents that form few or no micelles such as ethanol or DMSO and/or by dissolving the active agents under conditions that are not beneficial for storage and administration (e.g. heating, mixing with concentrated active agent solutions in organic solvents) to form sufficiently stable oversaturated solutions.


In some cases, solubility of the lipophilic active agents in the contrast agent solutions or the stability of oversaturated solutions are surprisingly improved. Another surprising effect due to the contrast agents is enhanced adhesion and absorption of active agents by vessel walls and good local tolerance of some substances of extreme systemic toxicity in sensitive vessel sections.


When active agent and contrast medium are incompatible or when the active agent does not dissolve properly in the contrast medium, the active agent solution can also be directly infused or injected through the diagnostic catheter into the respective vessel. It is preferred to use similar volumes as they are common for vessel imaging using contrast media through catheters [Elke M: Kontrastmittel in der radiologischen Diagnostik, pp. 113-119, 3rd edition, Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart New York, 1992].


Contrast agents are solutions, suspensions or emulsions well tolerated by vessels that can be used to enhance the representation of blood vessels or the bloodstream in radiograms, sonograms, optical imaging or magnet resonance imaging.


These contrast agents include Visipaque 320 (iodixanol), Ultravist 370 (iopromide), Omnipaque 350 (iohexol) or Solutrast 370 (iopamidol) or Magnevist (gadolinium-DPTA) or Gadovist 1M (Gd-DO3A-butrol).


Active agents can be all substances suitable for inhibiting cell growth, cell multiplication and hyperplastic proliferation provided they meet the criteria defined above regarding lipophilia and/or binding to tissue components. Inasmuch as some active agents are not sufficiently lipophilic or capable of binding, their pharmacologically active derivatives or precursors of pharmacologically active substances may be used that release the actual active agent when in the tissue only. Preferred are cytostatics from the taxoid group such as paclitaxel and docetaxel ((2R,3S)—N-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)-2-hydroxy-3-phenyl-β-alan-ine-(4-acetoxy-2-α-benzoyloxy-5-β, 20-epoxy-1, 7-β, 10-β-trihydroxy-9-oxo-11-taxene-13-α-yl-ester)), or epothilones as examples of lipophilic substances. These are so lipophilic and insoluble in water that even more hydrophilic derivatives as described by Nicollaou K C, Riemer C, Kerr M A, Rideout D, Wrasidlo W. Design, Synthesis and biological activity of protaxols. Nature, 1993; 364: pp. 464-466 or in U.S. Pat. No. 457,674, Novel Taxoids, are preferred as long as their molecular weight does not exceed ca. 10 kD.


Other useful active agents are selected from the groups of corticoids, mitosis inhibitors such as colchicine, antibiotics such as azithromycin or roxithromycin (Gupta et al. 1998) or antioxidants such as probucol, as well as heparin and hirudin derivatives or prostacyclins. Furthermore, immunosuppressants such as rapamycin are among the active agents that can be used.


Examples of lipophilic derivatives of otherwise hydrophilic cytostatics can be found in Brunner H, Schellerer K-M, Treittinger B. Synthesis and in vitro testing of hematoporphyrin type ligands in platinum(II) complexes as potent cytostatic and phototoxic antitumor agents. Inorganica Chimica Acta, 1997; 264: pp. 67-79 in the form of conjugates of platinum complexes with porphyrins.


The preparations according to the invention that contain a cytostatic as an active ingredient are also suitable for treating tumor diseases. It is advantageous in this case that the treatment is local, which minimizes the strain the patient is put under.


Besides lipophilic substances, other active agents or substrate-bound active agents with a specific affinity to vessel walls, particularly to vessel walls showing pathological change, are suitable. Substances have a specific affinity to vessel walls when they are not washed away by the bloodstream within a few minutes. It is known that small concentrations of magnetites are deposited after intravenous administration in vessel walls that show arteriosclerotic change (Schmitz S A et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide—enhanced MRI of atherosclerotic plaques in Watanabe hereditable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Invest Radiol, 2000; 35: 460-471). However it is surprising that these magnetites reach concentrations sufficient for treatment after a short-time flow through the vessels that are dilated using a balloon. To make these magnetites usable for treatment, they must be coated with drugs as described, for example, by Lubbe A S, Bergemann C, Huhnt W. Fricke T, Riess H, Brock J W, Huhn D. Preclinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting: Tolerance and efficacy. Cancer Research, 1996, 56: 4694-4701).


The active agents are dissolved as much as possible in the undiluted contrast agents. They can also be prepared as a separate solution that is diluted with contrast agents prior to use. The mixing ratio of active agent solution and contrast agent solution should not be greater than 2:1, preferably <1:1, <0.2:1 being particularly preferred. The active agent should be dissolved in a well-tolerable aqueous medium or a medium that can be mixed with water. Also admissible are organic solvents that are well tolerated (at least after being diluted with the contrast agent solution or another aqueous medium) such as ethanol, DMSO, DMF, etc. The prepared injection solution will mostly contain as great a portion of water as possible (>90 volume percent, preferred >95 volume percent, >99 volume percent particularly preferred).


The concentration range of each active agent is dependent on their solubility in physiologically tolerable solvents without having to resort to micelle-forming agents such as cremophor and on the efficacy and tolerability of the active agents. The upper limit of the concentration is always determined by the volume to be administered (e.g. 100 to 200 ml for repeated injection into the coronary arteries) and the maximum systemically tolerable dose (e.g. ca. 100 mg per sqm body surface for paclitaxel). Preferred and sufficiently effective due to local administration and action are dosages of 1/10th or less of the maximum systemically tolerable dose.


Other effective substances such as coagulation inhibitors, platelet aggregation inhibitors, enzyme inhibitors, complex-forming agents for calcium ions, etc. may be added to the preparations. These do not have to meet the criteria for lipophilia, binding to tissue components or molecular weight as the effect can also be acute and intravascular; what has been said in the paragraph regarding concentration and dosage above applies here because the focus is on the local effect in the vessel section through which the preparation flows.


Another way of administering antiproliferative agents is provided by a catheter used for vessel dilatation that has an inflatable balloon which itself causes the vascular dilatation. The balloon can be coated with the active agent. When the vessel is dilated, the balloon is pressed against the vessel wall. This provides an opportunity for the active agent to transfer into the vessel wall. If the balloon is used to dilate a stent, even the active agent between the balloon and the stent can be released because the metal struts of the stent are displaced relative to the balloon surface. These variations of active agent administration do not constitute an additional step for the physician as compared to the original process of vessel dilatation or stent implantation.


The following methods can be used if the active agents are to be applied to the part of the catheter that is used for vessel dilatation: Dissolution of the active agent(s) in a solvent that does not corrode the catheter, immersion of the respective catheter part in the solution, removal of the catheter from the solution, and drying. Optionally, intravasally acceptable matrix or gel-forming adjuvants can be added to the active agent solution in the vessel, e.g. lipids or polymers used in pharmacology. Coating can be performed in several steps, while agent-containing and agent-free layers may alternate. The solvents for the respective layers should be selected in such a way that the subsequent coating does not strip off the previous one.


The examples below shall explain the invention:







EXAMPLES
Example 1a
Solution for Direct Administration into the Arteries

80 mg of 7-(2″,3″-dihydroxypropyl oxycarbonyl)-paclitaxel are dissolved in 5 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide and diluted with 5 ml of a 5% glucose solution. The solution or a part thereof is slowly infused into the previously dilated arteries.


Example 1b
X-Ray Contrast Medium with an Additive for Inhibiting Intimal Hyperplasia

99 parts of a portion of the solution described in 1a are added to the Visipaque 320, a commercial X-ray contrast medium, and immediately mixed well. The solution can be used as is common for angiography prior to or after vessel dilatation.


Example 2a
Solution as an Additive to Contrast Agents

200 mg of 7-(2″,3″-dihydroxypropyl oxycarbonyl)-paclitaxel are dissolved in 10 ml of absolute ethanol (=solution A); 0.35 ml of this solution can be added to 100 ml of contrast agent.


Example 2b
X-Ray Contrast Medium for Restenosis Prevention

100 ml of Ultravist 370 (Schering AG, Berlin; active ingredient iopromide equivalent to 370 mg of iodine/ml) containing 0.35 volume percent of ethanol and 7 mg of 7-(2″,3″-dihydroxypropyl oxycarbonyl)-paclitaxel. The solution is produced by dissolving the 7-(2″,3″-dihydroxypropyl oxycarbonyl)-paclitaxel in ethanol and adding it under constant stirring to the contrast agent.


Example 2c
X-Ray Contrast Medium for Restenosis Prevention

The preparation according to Example 2b with an addition of 10 I.U. of low-molecular weight heparin.


Example 2d
Restenosis-Inhibiting Perfusion Solution

3.5 ml of the solution A described in Example 2a are mixed with 46.5 ml of ethanol and added under fast shaking to 1000 ml of warm (−50.degree. C.) 5% glucose solution or isotonic electrolyte solution. This solution is infused via a catheter into the vessels to be treated just like a contrast medium; however, the infusion rate can be reduced as compared to that of contrast agents.


Example 3a
X-Ray Contrast Medium for Inhibiting Intimal Hyperplasia

100 ml of Ultravist 370 (see Example 2b) mixed with 0.4 volume percent of ethanol and 14.4 mg of 7-(2″,3″-dihydroxypropyl oxycarbonyl)-paclitaxel. The preparation is produced as described in Example 2b.


Example 4a
X-Ray Contrast Medium for Inhibiting Cell Growth

100 ml of Solutrast 370 (Byk-Gulden, Konstanz; active ingredient iopamidol equivalent to 370 mg of iodine/ml) containing 1.0 volume percent of ethanol and 8.2 mg of paclitaxel/ml. The preparation is produced by first dissolving the paclitaxel in absolute ethanol while heating it slightly, then adding the contrast agent quickly and under strong stirring.


Example 4b
X-Ray Contrast Medium for Inhibiting Intimal Hyperplasia

Preparation according to Example 4a plus adding 5 I.U. of heparin and 5 mmol/l of citrate buffer (pH 7.0).


Example 5a
Solution as an Additive to Contrast Agents or Infusion Solutions

20 mg of (±)-trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane{7,12-bis[1-(1,4,7,10,1-3,16-hexaoxaheptadecyl)-ethyl]-3,8,13,17-tetramethylporphyrin-2,18-dipropionato}platinum(II) are dissolved in 10 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide (=solution B).


Example 5b
X-Ray Contrast Medium with an Additive for Inhibiting Cell Growth

1 ml of solution B is added under fast stirring to 100 ml of Ultravist 370 (see Example 2b). The solution is suitable for infusion into arteries or injection into living or dead tissues or body cavities. It allows excellent control of its initial distribution and causes a long-lasting cytostatic effect.


Example 5c
Contrast Medium for Magnetic Resonance Tomography with an Additive for Inhibiting Cell Growth

1 ml of solution B is added to 10 ml of 50 mmolar gadolinium DTPA (=gadopentetate) solution. A 50 mmolar gadolinium-DTPA solution is prepared from Magnevist, a commercial preparation (Schering AG, Berlin), by diluting the product ten times. The solution can be infiltrated, for example, in vital tumors or in tumors after they were destroyed by ethanol, heat or cold treatment. The distribution of the solution is well visible in magnetic resonance tomograms. The solution itself supports the total destruction of the tumor in the immediately infiltrated area and its vicinity.


Example 6
In-Vivo Efficacy of the Preparation as Described in Example 2b

2 coronary arteries each in a total of 8 pigs were dilated under anesthesia, and stents (fine, heavily perforated metal tubes) were implanted. The arteries respond by wall thickening, which results in narrowing the original lumen of the arteries. 4 pigs were administered a regular X-ray contrast agent (Ultravist 370) for imaging the arteries and checking the stent implantation, 4 pigs were administered the preparation according to Example 2b. The vessels of both test groups practically had the same widths (inside diameters 3.4±0.2 mm and 3.5±0.2 mm) immediately after treatment. 4 weeks after treatment, the inside arterial diameter in animals that only received the regular contrast agent had stenosed by 1.9±0.8 mm, whereas the arterial diameter in the animals that were treated with the solution according to Example 2b was only reduced by 0.9±0.6 mm. This difference is statistically significant (p=0.01). The undiluted solution according to Example 2b was tolerated without side effects despite the addition of a high concentration of a relatively toxic cytostatic after injection in the coronary arteries and simultaneous ECG and blood pressure measurements.


Example 7a
Coating a Catheter

The distal area carrying the balloon of a balloon catheter designed for vessel dilatation is immersed under sterile conditions in the ethanolic solutions from Example 2a (=solution A), kept in the solution for ca. 5 minutes, then removed and dried for 2 hours at room temperature. The balloon catheter can then be used in the common way for dilating vessels.


Alternatively, a stent is placed on the balloon after drying.


Example 7b

The procedure is like in Example 7a, but 100 mg of pharmaceutical castor oil are now added to solution A.


Example 8a
Solubility in the Contrast Agent or Physiological NaCl Solution

7.6 mg of paclitaxel are dissolved in 0.5 mg of ethanol and added at room temperature to 50 ml Ultravist-370 (contains 768 mg of iopromide/ml, specific weight ca. 1.4 g/ml). A clear solution without any turbidity is obtained after mixing that remains stable for several days. No particles can be identified in the solution under a microscope.


4.2 mg of paclitaxel are dissolved in 0.5 ml of ethanol and added at room temperature to 50 ml of a 0.9% NaCl solution. The preparation becomes turbid immediately after mixing; most particles are found on the surface of the solution after 2 hours. Large aggregations of fine particles are found using a microscope.


Evaluation: The solubility of paclitaxel in the contrast agent is highly surprising. The contrast agent solution contains 0.7 ml of water/ml of solution mixture, i.e. Less solvent is available to paclitaxel in the contrast agent solution than in the NaCl solution. In spite of that, paclitaxel dissolves better in the contrast agent solution than in the NaCl solution.


Example 8b
Magnetite as the Carrier of the Antihyperplastic Agent

75 mg of paclitaxel are dissolved in 5 ml of ethanol. The paclitaxel solution is added to 50 ml of an aqueous preparation of a colloidal magnetite coated with degraded dextrane (concentration refers to Fe2+/3+ 0.5 molar, e.g. SH U 555C, test preparation by Schering AG, Berlin) and quickly intermixed. The magnetite particles adsorb paclitaxel and carry it after intravenous or intra-arterial injection, inter alia, into arterial walls showing arteriosclerotic change and brain tumors. Dosage depends on the use of the magnetite and is ca. 50 μmol referred to Fe/kg of body weight.

Claims
  • 1. A catheter balloon having a surface and composition applied thereto; wherein the composition comprises: at least one lipophilic anti-hyperplastic agent selected from paclitaxel, 7-(2′,3′-dihydroxypropyl oxycarbonyl)-paclitaxel, docetaxel, probucol, azithromycin, roxithromycin, heparin, prostacyclins, colchicine, epithilone, and rapamycin;wherein said balloon surface does not contain a pharmacological polymer, andwherein said composition is of a form suitable for administration into a blood vessel section;wherein the composition contains a solubility promoter that does not form micelles.
  • 2. The catheter balloon according to claim 1, wherein said at least one lipophilic anti hyperplastic agent is rapamycin.
  • 3. The catheter balloon according to claim 1, wherein said at least one lipophilic anti hyperplastic agent is paclitaxel.
  • 4. The catheter balloon according to claim 1, wherein said composition further comprises an X-ray contrast agent selected from iodixanol, gadolinium-DTPA, GD-DO3A-butrol, iopromide, iohexol, and iopamidol.
  • 5. The catheter balloon according to claim 4, wherein said X-ray contrast agent is iohexol.
  • 6. The catheter balloon according to claim 1, wherein said composition further comprises a coagulation inhibitor, a platelet aggregation inhibitor, an enzyme inhibitor, and/or a calcium chelator.
  • 7. The catheter balloon according to claim 1, wherein said at least one lipophilic anti hyperplastic agent irreversibly or reversibly binds to tissue at a minimum percentage of 10%.
  • 8. The catheter balloon according to claim 1, wherein said at least one lipophilic anti hyperplastic agent is paclitaxel, docetaxel, or 7-(2″,3″-dihydroxypropyl oxycarbonyl)-paclitaxel.
  • 9. A method for restenosis prevention in a patient, comprising administering to said patient a composition from the catheter balloon according to claim 1.
  • 10. A catheter balloon having a surface and a coating applied thereto wherein said coating is a dried layer obtained from a solution consisting essentially of: at least one lipophilic anti-hyperplastic agent selected from paclitaxel, 7-(2″,3″-dihydroxypropyl oxycarbonyl)-paclitaxel, docetaxel, probucol, azithromycin, roxithromycin, heparin, prostacyclins, colchicine, epithilone, and rapamycin;at least one solvent;optionally at least one X-ray contrast agent selected from iodixanol, gadolinium-DTPA, GD-DO3A-butrol, iopromide, iohexol, and iopamidol; andoptionally a coagulation inhibitor, a platelet aggregation inhibitor, an enzyme inhibitor, and/or a calcium chelator;wherein said balloon surface does not contain a pharmacological polymer; andwherein the composition contains a solubility promoter that does not form micelles.
  • 11. The catheter balloon according to claim 10, wherein said at least one lipophilic anti hyperplastic agent is rapamycin.
  • 12. The catheter balloon according to claim 10, wherein said at least one lipophilic anti hyperplastic agent is paclitaxel.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
101 15 740 Mar 2001 DE national
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/763,125 filed on Jun. 14, 2007, which is incorporated by reference herein, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/472,844 filed on Sep. 26, 2003 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 7,750,041), which is the national phase of PCT/DE01/04782 filed on Dec. 20, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (246)
Number Name Date Kind
4101984 MacGregor Jul 1978 A
4217894 Franetzki Aug 1980 A
4247352 Stupp et al. Jan 1981 A
4305926 Everse et al. Dec 1981 A
4343788 Mustacich et al. Aug 1982 A
4364921 Speck et al. Dec 1982 A
4476590 Scales et al. Oct 1984 A
4479795 Mustacich et al. Oct 1984 A
4502159 Woodroof et al. Mar 1985 A
4532315 Letoffe et al. Jul 1985 A
4573476 Ruiz et al. Mar 1986 A
4677143 Laurin et al. Jun 1987 A
4769013 Lorenz et al. Sep 1988 A
4776337 Palmaz Oct 1988 A
4793825 Benjamin et al. Dec 1988 A
4872867 Joh Oct 1989 A
4879135 Greco et al. Nov 1989 A
4886062 Wiktor et al. Dec 1989 A
4909799 Thulesius et al. Mar 1990 A
4917686 Bayston et al. Apr 1990 A
4925668 Khan et al. May 1990 A
4950256 Luther et al. Aug 1990 A
4950258 Kawai et al. Aug 1990 A
4994047 Walker et al. Feb 1991 A
4997643 Partain et al. Mar 1991 A
5004461 Wilson et al. Apr 1991 A
5019096 Fox, Jr. et al. May 1991 A
5019393 Ito et al. May 1991 A
5019601 Allen May 1991 A
5051257 Pietronigro Sep 1991 A
5053048 Pinchuk Oct 1991 A
5059166 Fischell et al. Oct 1991 A
5067491 Taylor et al. Nov 1991 A
5098977 Frautschi et al. Mar 1992 A
5102402 Dror et al. Apr 1992 A
5108424 Hoffman et al. Apr 1992 A
5112457 Marchant May 1992 A
5135516 Sahatjian et al. Aug 1992 A
5157049 Haugwitz et al. Oct 1992 A
5163952 Froix Nov 1992 A
5165952 Solomon et al. Nov 1992 A
5171217 March Dec 1992 A
5176626 Soehendra Jan 1993 A
5182317 Winters et al. Jan 1993 A
5197977 Hoffman et al. Mar 1993 A
5217493 Raad et al. Jun 1993 A
5222971 Willard et al. Jun 1993 A
5229172 Cahalan et al. Jul 1993 A
5232685 Speck et al. Aug 1993 A
5234456 Silvestrini et al. Aug 1993 A
5244654 Narayanan Sep 1993 A
5282823 Schwartz et al. Feb 1994 A
5288711 Mitchell et al. Feb 1994 A
5298255 Sawamoto et al. Mar 1994 A
5304121 Sahatjian Apr 1994 A
5306286 Stack et al. Apr 1994 A
5314688 Kauffman et al. May 1994 A
5320634 Vigil et al. Jun 1994 A
5342348 Kaplan Aug 1994 A
5344411 Domb et al. Sep 1994 A
5344444 Glastra Sep 1994 A
5345933 Peterson et al. Sep 1994 A
5348873 Matsunda et al. Sep 1994 A
5356433 Rowland et al. Oct 1994 A
5370614 Amundson et al. Dec 1994 A
5380299 Fearnot et al. Jan 1995 A
5383927 De Golcoechea et al. Jan 1995 A
5383928 Scott et al. Jan 1995 A
5419760 Narciso, Jr. May 1995 A
5443458 Eury Aug 1995 A
5447724 Helmus et al. Sep 1995 A
5449382 Dayton Sep 1995 A
5454886 Burrell et al. Oct 1995 A
5455040 Marchant Oct 1995 A
5456663 Lemelson Oct 1995 A
5457113 Cillinan et al. Oct 1995 A
5464450 Buscemi et al. Nov 1995 A
5464650 Berg et al. Nov 1995 A
5500013 Buscemi et al. Mar 1996 A
5504102 Agharkar et al. Apr 1996 A
5510330 Martin et al. Apr 1996 A
5531716 Luzio et al. Jul 1996 A
5534288 Gruskin et al. Jul 1996 A
5554181 Das Sep 1996 A
5554182 Dinh et al. Sep 1996 A
5567495 Modak et al. Oct 1996 A
5569463 Helmus et al. Oct 1996 A
5571086 Kaplan et al. Nov 1996 A
5578075 Dayton Nov 1996 A
5605696 Eury et al. Feb 1997 A
5607463 Schwartz et al. Mar 1997 A
5607475 Cahalan et al. Mar 1997 A
5609629 Fearnot et al. Mar 1997 A
5624411 Tuch Apr 1997 A
5626562 Castro May 1997 A
5629008 Lee May 1997 A
5629881 Leeb et al. May 1997 A
5643580 Subramaniam Jul 1997 A
5649977 Campbell et al. Jul 1997 A
5674192 Sahatjian Oct 1997 A
5679400 Tuch Oct 1997 A
5681846 Trissel Oct 1997 A
5693014 Abele et al. Dec 1997 A
5697967 Dinh et al. Dec 1997 A
5716981 Hunter et al. Feb 1998 A
5733327 Igaki et al. Mar 1998 A
5741478 Osborne et al. Apr 1998 A
5762638 Shikani et al. Jun 1998 A
5766158 Opolski Jun 1998 A
5770198 Coller et al. Jun 1998 A
5772640 Modak et al. Jun 1998 A
5789018 Engelson et al. Aug 1998 A
5792158 Lary Aug 1998 A
5814301 Klopp et al. Sep 1998 A
5820607 Tcholakian et al. Oct 1998 A
5824049 Ragheb et al. Oct 1998 A
5827289 Reiley Oct 1998 A
5837008 Berg et al. Nov 1998 A
5863745 Fitzgerald et al. Jan 1999 A
5873904 Ragheb et al. Feb 1999 A
5886026 Hunter et al. Mar 1999 A
5893840 Hull et al. Apr 1999 A
5893867 Bagaisan et al. Apr 1999 A
5902283 Darouiche et al. May 1999 A
5916596 Desai et al. Jun 1999 A
5921952 Desmond et al. Jul 1999 A
5922754 Burchett et al. Jul 1999 A
5954706 Sahatjian Sep 1999 A
5977163 Li et al. Nov 1999 A
5980972 Ding Nov 1999 A
5981568 Kunz et al. Nov 1999 A
5997162 English et al. Dec 1999 A
6010480 Abele et al. Jan 2000 A
6013092 Dehdashtian et al. Jan 2000 A
6017948 Rubinfeld et al. Jan 2000 A
6039721 Johnson et al. Mar 2000 A
6071285 Lashinski et al. Jun 2000 A
6096070 Ragheb et al. Aug 2000 A
6123923 Unger et al. Sep 2000 A
6146358 Rowe Nov 2000 A
6171232 Papandreau et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177061 Klaveness et al. Jan 2001 B1
6203487 Consigny et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203551 Wu Mar 2001 B1
6207133 Reszka et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214333 Zoldhelyi et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221467 Nazarova et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231615 Preissman et al. May 2001 B1
6240616 Yan Jun 2001 B1
6248100 de Toledo et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258108 Lary Jul 2001 B1
6264624 Desmond et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264642 Kuen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273908 Ndondo-Lay Aug 2001 B1
6273913 Wright et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287285 Michal et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299604 Ragheb et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306151 Lary et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306166 Barry et al. Oct 2001 B1
6335029 Kamath et al. Jan 2002 B1
6355058 Pacetti et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364856 Ding et al. Apr 2002 B1
6369039 Palasis et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375931 Østensen et al. Apr 2002 B2
6400448 Sugawara et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406754 Chappa et al. Jun 2002 B2
6419692 Yang et al. Jul 2002 B1
6479033 Reszka et al. Nov 2002 B1
6491619 Trauthen et al. Dec 2002 B1
6491938 Kunz et al. Dec 2002 B2
6495579 Hunter Dec 2002 B1
6500341 Wang et al. Dec 2002 B2
6503954 Bhat et al. Jan 2003 B1
6515016 Hunter et al. Feb 2003 B2
6544223 Kokish et al. Apr 2003 B1
6544544 Hunter et al. Apr 2003 B2
6575888 Zamora et al. Jun 2003 B2
6585765 Hossainy et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599275 Fischer Jul 2003 B1
6599448 Ehrhard et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599928 Kunz et al. Jul 2003 B2
6616591 Teoh et al. Sep 2003 B1
6616650 Rowe Sep 2003 B1
6635082 Hossainy et al. Oct 2003 B1
6638913 Speck et al. Oct 2003 B1
6682545 Kester Jan 2004 B1
6695811 Samson et al. Feb 2004 B2
6706892 Ezrin et al. Mar 2004 B1
6730064 Ragheb et al. May 2004 B2
6774278 Ragheb et al. Aug 2004 B1
6867190 Carney et al. Mar 2005 B2
6918927 Bates et al. Jul 2005 B2
7060051 Palasis et al. Jun 2006 B2
7179251 Palasis Feb 2007 B2
7419683 Szebeni et al. Sep 2008 B2
7445792 Toner et al. Nov 2008 B2
7491234 Palasis et al. Feb 2009 B2
7611532 Bates et al. Nov 2009 B2
7731685 Bates et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750041 Speck et al. Jul 2010 B2
7811622 Bates et al. Oct 2010 B2
8389043 Speck et al. Mar 2013 B2
20010014717 Hossainy et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010016611 Kashiwabara et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010034363 Li et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010037140 Gaudoin et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010044651 Steinke et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020013549 Zhong et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020032414 Ragheb et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020037358 Barry et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020098278 Bates et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020123505 Mollison et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020193828 Griffin et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030007944 O'Halloran et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028243 Bates et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030028244 Bates et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030036794 Ragheb et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030059454 Barry et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030100600 Kinsella et al. May 2003 A1
20030195548 Kester Oct 2003 A1
20040068241 Fischer Apr 2004 A1
20040073284 Bates et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040115228 Costa et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040224003 Schultz Nov 2004 A1
20040243225 Ragheb et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050042295 Hunter et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050063926 Bathina et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050101522 Speck et al. May 2005 A1
20050123605 Hunter et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050222677 Bates et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050250672 Speck Nov 2005 A9
20050278021 Bates et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060020243 Speck et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020331 Bates et al. Jan 2006 A1
20070128118 Yu et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070212394 Reyes et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080010234 Nakagawa et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080025510 Yung et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080102033 Speck et al. May 2008 A1
20080102034 Speck et al. May 2008 A1
20080118544 Wang May 2008 A1
20080175887 Wang Jul 2008 A1
20080255508 Wang Oct 2008 A1
20080255509 Wang Oct 2008 A1
20080255510 Wang Oct 2008 A1
20100145266 Orlowski Jun 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (169)
Number Date Country
2132936 Mar 1995 CA
2 207 025 Jun 1996 CA
2 218 103 Oct 1996 CA
2345729 Apr 2000 CA
2345697 May 2000 CA
1224622 Aug 1999 CN
4225553 May 1994 DE
4446694 Dec 1994 DE
4 334 272 Apr 1995 DE
4341478 Jun 1995 DE
44 35 652 Apr 1996 DE
195 14 104 Nov 1996 DE
69119753 Jan 1997 DE
69403966 Feb 1998 DE
19724796 Dec 1998 DE
10115740 Oct 2002 DE
10244847.7 Nov 2002 DE
69925936 Jul 2005 DE
20 122 736 Jul 2007 DE
0 357 003 Mar 1990 EP
0 470 246 Feb 1992 EP
0706376 Jul 1993 EP
0 578 998 Jan 1994 EP
0 604 022 Jun 1994 EP
0 623 354 Nov 1994 EP
0 673 114 Sep 1995 EP
0 681 475 Nov 1995 EP
0 717 041 Jun 1996 EP
0 747 069 Dec 1996 EP
0706376 Jun 1997 EP
0 797 988 Oct 1997 EP
0 975 340 Feb 2000 EP
1 407 786 Apr 2000 EP
0 551 182 Jul 2000 EP
1 037 605 Sep 2000 EP
0829238 Sep 2000 EP
1 090 637 Apr 2001 EP
1118325 Jul 2001 EP
1140273 Oct 2001 EP
1 159 974 Dec 2001 EP
1 250 166 Oct 2002 EP
1 372 737 Jan 2004 EP
1 447 098 Aug 2004 EP
1 512 398 Mar 2005 EP
1 521 603 Apr 2005 EP
1 536 850 Jun 2005 EP
1 666 070 Jun 2006 EP
1 669 091 Jun 2006 EP
1 669 092 Jun 2006 EP
1666071 Jun 2006 EP
1 695 697 Aug 2006 EP
1 695 698 Aug 2006 EP
1 735 042 Dec 2006 EP
1 781 209 May 2007 EP
2 092 941 Aug 2009 EP
2 092 942 Aug 2009 EP
2 098 230 Sep 2009 EP
06 063145 Mar 1994 JP
7500585 Jan 1995 JP
07 328124 Dec 1995 JP
10509691 Sep 1998 JP
11012160 Jan 1999 JP
2000 507930 Jun 2000 JP
WO-90 13293 Nov 1990 WO
WO-90 13332 Nov 1990 WO
WO-91 12779 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9211890 Jul 1992 WO
WO-92 11896 Jul 1992 WO
WO-92 12717 Aug 1992 WO
WO 9215282 Sep 1992 WO
WO-92 20718 Nov 1992 WO
WO-93 06792 Apr 1993 WO
WO 9307875 Apr 1993 WO
WO-93 09762 May 1993 WO
WO-93 09765 May 1993 WO
WO-93 11120 Jun 1993 WO
WO-93 11668 Jun 1993 WO
WO 9503795 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9407484 Apr 1994 WO
WO-94 07529 Apr 1994 WO
WO-94 16706 Aug 1994 WO
WO 9423787 Oct 1994 WO
WO-94 25020 Nov 1994 WO
WO-94 26291 Nov 1994 WO
WO-95 03036 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9503083 Feb 1995 WO
WO-95 03083 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9638183 May 1995 WO
WO 9515782 Jun 1995 WO
WO 9617629 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9620718 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9625176 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9625176 Aug 1996 WO
WO-96 25282 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9639949 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9639970 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9824427 Dec 1996 WO
WO-97 01327 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9726862 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9843618 Mar 1997 WO
WO 9717098 May 1997 WO
WO-97 31674 Sep 1997 WO
WO 9733552 Sep 1997 WO
WO-97 41916 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9811933 Mar 1998 WO
WO 9814174 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9815282 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9825176 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9962510 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9830249 Jul 1998 WO
WO-98 31415 Jul 1998 WO
WO 0010552 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9836784 Aug 1998 WO
WO-98 43618 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9843618 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9847540 Oct 1998 WO
WO-99 08729 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9908729 Feb 1999 WO
WO-99 09729 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9912577 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9913916 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9919004 Apr 1999 WO
WO-99 08729 May 1999 WO
WO 9908729 May 1999 WO
WO-99 25336 May 1999 WO
WO-99 30684 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9955396 Nov 1999 WO
WO-99 59556 Nov 1999 WO
WO-00 00023 Jan 2000 WO
WO-00 00238 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0006152 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0021584 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0021584 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0032238 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0032267 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0044414 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0045744 Aug 2000 WO
WO-00 47197 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0050105 Aug 2000 WO
WO-01 24866 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0149268 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0149338 Jul 2001 WO
WO 200149338 Jul 2001 WO
WO-01-54748 Aug 2001 WO
WO-01 076525 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0183016 Nov 2001 WO
WO 02076509 Dec 2001 WO
WO 02066092 Aug 2002 WO
WO 02076509 Oct 2002 WO
03022264 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03022264 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03026718 Apr 2003 WO
WO-03 41686 May 2003 WO
WO 03048166 Jun 2003 WO
WO-2004 006976 Jan 2004 WO
WO-2004 022124 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004022124 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004028582 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004028610 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2005 089855 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2005 112570 Dec 2005 WO
WO-2006 023104 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2007106441 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2008 063576 May 2008 WO
WO 2007106441 Aug 2008 WO
WO-2009 051614 Apr 2009 WO
WO-2009 051615 Apr 2009 WO
WO-2009 051616 Apr 2009 WO
WO-2009 051618 Apr 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (177)
Entry
Li et al., J. Nucl. Med., 38 (7), 1042-47 (1997).
Perflorocarbon Compounds as X-Ray Contrast Media in the Lungs Bulletin Soc, Int. Chic. 1975, 34 (2) 137-41.
Paclitaxel: Ein Chemotherapeuticum Zur Restenoseprohylaze? Experimentelle Untersuchengen In Vitro Und in Cico, Zeitschrift Fur Kardiologie, Band 89, Heft 5 (2000), pp. 390-397.
Engelmann et al, 2007 International Journal of Pharmaceutics 329, 12-18.
Final Rejection dated May 1, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,577, filed Mar. 21, 2005.
Non-Final Rejection dated Oct. 5, 2007 in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,577, filed Mar. 21, 2005.
Non-Final Rejection dated Jul. 2, 2007 in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/472,844, filed Sep. 26, 2003.
Final Rejection dated Nov. 1, 2007 in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/472,844, filed Sep. 26, 2003.
Non-Final Rejection dated May 29, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/472,844, filed Sep. 26, 2003.
Final Rejection dated Mar. 4, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/472,844, filed Sep. 26, 2003.
Non-Final Rejection dated Jan. 15, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/618,977, filed Jul. 14, 2003.
Kolodgie et al., Circulation Research, 2000; 87: 264-267.
Nishio, K., et al., “Enhanced Interaction Between Tubulin and Microtubule-Associated Protein 2 Via Inhibition of Map Kinase and CDC2 Kinase by Paclitaxel,” Int. J. Cancer: 63, p. 688-693 (1995).
Ding, A., et al., “Association of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase with Microtubules in Mouse Macrophases,” J. Exp. Med. vol. 183, Apr. 1996, p. 1899-1904.
Lieu, C.-H., et al., “Role of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Kinase in Taxol-Induced Apoptosis in Human Leukemic U937 Cells1,” Cell Growth & Differentiation, vol. 9, p. 767-776, Sep. 1998.
“Ceramide-Coated Balloon Catheters Limit Neointimal Hyperplasia After Stretch Injury in Carotid Arteries,” Circulation Research, 2000; 87: 282-288.
“Stent”, www.thefreedictionary.com/Stent, 2000.
“The Definition of Coated Stent”, www.medterms.com, 2003.
“Balloon Catheter”, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/balloon.catheter, 2008.
Werk et al.: “Inhibition of Restenosis in Femoropopliteal Arteries: Paclitaxel-Coated Versus Uncoated Balloon: Femoral Paclitaxel Randomized Pilot Trial”, Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association, 2008, vol. 118, p. 1358-1365.
Tepe et al.: “Local Delivery of Paclitaxel to Inhibit Restenosis During Angioplasty of the Leg”, The New England Journal of Medicine, 2008, vol. 358, No. 7, pp. 689-699.
Henry et al.: “‘POBA Plus’: Will the Balloon Regain Its Luster?”, Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association, 2008, vol. 118, pp. 1309-1311.
Schwartz et al.: “Preclinical Restenosis Models and Drug-Eluting Stents”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004, vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 1373-1385, Elsevier Inc.
Badapulle et al.: “A Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials of Drug-Eluting Stents”, Lancet, 2004, vol. 364, pp. 583-591.
Scheller et al.: “Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter”, The New England Journal of Medicine, 2006, vol. 355, No. 20, pp. 2113-2124.
Licha et al.: “Hydrophilic Cyanine Dyes As Contrast Agents for Near-Infrared Tumor Imaging: Synthesis, Photophysical Properties and Spectroscopic In Vivo Characterization”, Phtochemistry and Photobiology, 2000, vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 392-398.
Phillips et al.: “A-Level Biology”, Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 7-8.
Pierre Signore et al., “Complete Inhibition of Intimal Hyperplasia by Perivascular Delivery of Paclitaxel in Balloon-injured Rat Carotid Arteries,” Laboratory Investigations, vol. 12, No. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 79-88.
File History of U.S. Appl. No. 60/395,434, filed Jul. 12, 2002.
File History of U.S. Appl. No. 60/244,446, filed Oct. 31, 2000.
Ran Kornowski et al., “Slow-Release Taxol Coated GRIT™ Stents Reduce Neointima Formation in a Porcine Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Model,” 70th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Nov. 9-12, 1997.
Alan W. Heldman et al., “Paclitaxel Stent Coating Inhibits Neointinal Hyperplasia at 4 Weeks in a Porcine Model of Coronary Restenosis,” Circulation, May 8, 2001, pp. 2289-2295.
Department of Health and Human Services Notice of Intramural Research Project, Oct. 1, 1993-Sep. 30, 1994; “Molecular Strategies to Treat Restenosis,” 4 pp.
Department of Health and Human Services Notice of Intramural Research Project, Oct. 1, 1994-Sep. 30, 1995, “Local Delivery of Therapeutic Agents for the Prevention of Restenosis,” 6 pp.
Teruo Inoue et al., “Comparison of Activation Process of Platelets and Neutrophils After Coronary Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Stable Angina Pectoris,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 86, Nov. 15, 2000, pp. 1057-1062.
Eric K. Rowinsky et al., “Paclitaxel (Taxol)”, Alastair JJ. Wood, ed. “Drug Therapy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 332, No. 15, Apr. 13, 1995, pp. 1004-1014.
Dorothea I. Axel et al., “Paclitaxel Inhibits Arterial Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Migration in Vitro and in Vivo Using Local Drug Delivery,” Circulation, 1997, vol. 96, pp. 636-645.
International Search Report for EP 06 00 1041, Search Date: Apr. 11, 2006.
International Search Report for EP 06 00 1042, Search Date: Apr. 10, 2006.
International Search Report for EP 06 00 1040, Search Date: Apr. 11, 2006.
International Search Report for PCT/DE01/04782, Search Date: Dec. 27, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/EP03/10480, Search Date: Feb. 20, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/DE03/02871, Search Date: Feb. 17, 2004.
Speck, Ulrich et al., “Inhibition of Restenosis in Stented Porcine Coronary Arteries,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 39 No. 3, Mar. 2004, pp. 182-186.
Scheller, Bruno et al., “Addition of Paclitaxel to Contrast Prevents Restenosis After Coronary StentImplantation,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 42 No. 8, 2003, pp. 1415-1420.
Scheller, Bruno et al., “Paclitaxel Balloon Coating, a Novel Method for Prevention and Therapy of Restenosis,” Circulation, Aug. 17, 2004, pp. 810-814.
Singla, Anil K. et al., “Paclitaxel and its Formulations,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 235, 2002, pp. 179-192.
Nuijen, Bastiaan et al., “Progress in the Development of Alternative Pharmaceutical Formulations of Taxanes,” Investigational New Drugs, vol. 19, 2001, pp. 143-153.
Wood, Shelly, “Drug-eluting Stents: Where They Are Now,” HeartWire, Jan. 22, 2003, 7 pgs., http://www.theheart.org/documents/page.cfm?from=590001500&doc—id=33903.
Singla, AK et al. “Paclitaxel and its formulations,” Int.J.Pharmceutics 235 (2002): 179-182.
Nuijen B et al., “Progress in the development of alternative . . . ,” Investigational New Drugs, 19(2001): 143-153.
Speck et al., “Inhibition of restenosis in stented porcine coronary . . . ” Invest.Radiol. 2004, 39, 182-186.
“Drugeluting stents: Where are they now,” Heartwire, p. 2, communication of www.theheart.org, Jan. 22, 2003.
Scheller et al., “Addition of paclitaxel to contrast media prevents restenosis after coronary stent implantation,” J.Am.Coll.Radiol. 2003, 42:1415-1420.
Scheller et al., “Paclitaxel balloon cutting—a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis,” Circulation, 2004, 110:810-814.
“Ceramide-coated balloon catheters limit neointimal hyperplasia after stretch injury in carotid arteries,” Circulation Research 2000, 87,282.
Martin Oberhoff et al., “Local delivery of Paclitaxel using the double-ballon perfusion catheter before stenting in the porcine coronary artery,” 2001,Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, pp. 562-568, vol. 53.
Christopher J. Creel et al., “Arterial Paclitaxel distribution and deposition,” Circulation Research, Apr. 28, 2000, pp. 879-884.
Dr. Karsch, “Lokale Applikation von Paclitaxel mit dem Schneider-Doppelballon,” nach experimenteller Stentimplantation an den Koronaraterien des Schweines, Gieβen 2001.
Toru Kataoka et al., “7-Hexanoyltaxol-Eluting Stent for prevention of Neointimal Growth,” Circulation, Oct. 1, 2002, pp. 1788-1793.
Roger Charles et al., “Ceramide-coated ballon catheters limit neointimal hyperplasia after stretch injury in carotid arteries,” Circulation Research, Aug. 18, 2000, pp. 282-288.
Frank D. Kolodgie et al., Local delivery of ceramide for restenosis: Is there a future for lipid therapy? Circulation Research, Aug. 18, 2000, pp. 264-267.
Alan W. Heldman et al., “Paclitaxel stent coating inhibits neointimal hyperplasia at 4 week in a porcine model of coronary restenosis,” Circulation, May 8, 2001, pp. 2289 2295.
Johnathan D. Adams et al., “Taxol: a history of pharmaceutical development and current pharmaceutical concerns,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 1993, pp. 141-147, No. 15.
Jackson et al., “Current usage of contrast agents, anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs in angiography and angioplasty in the UK,” Clinical Radiology, 1995, pp. 699-704, vol. 50, No. 10.
“Water soluble paclitaxel prodrugs,” Espacenet, Publication Date: Jun. 27, 2000; English Abstract of JP-2000 507930.
Buaayu KK, “Balloon catheter for intravascular dosing,” Patent Abstracts of Japan, Publication Date: Mar. 8, 1994; English Abstract of JP-06 063145.
Magna International Toronto, “Process for producing a plastic cladding component and cladding component produced especially by said process,” Espacenet, Publication Date: Aug. 22, 1996; English Abstract of WO-96 25282.
Terumo Corp., “Medicine dosing catheter,” Patent Abstracts of Japan, Publication Date: Dec. 19, 1995; English Abstract of JP-07 328124.
Thomson Innovation, Patent Record View, Publication Date: Jan. 19, 1995; English abstract of JP-7 500585.
Thomson Innovation, Patent Record View, Publication Date: Sep. 22, 1998; English abstract of JP-10 509691.
Herberts & Co GMBh, “Liquid mixtures of photo-initiators, process for their production and their use,” Espacenet, Publication Date: Nov. 26, 1992; English Abstract of WO-92 20718.
Strecker Ernst Peter Dr Med Pr., “Implantable percutaneous endoprosthesis,” Espacenet, Publication Date: Jan. 19, 1994; English Abstract of EP-0 578 998.
Judgment of Sep. 16, 2011 (Paper No. 52) from Interference No. 105,787.
Redeclaration of Interference (Paper No. 48) issued Sep. 13, 2011.
Applicants' Amendment of Sep. 12, 2011 (Paper No. 47), filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,125, and cited in the Judgment of Sep. 16, 2011 in Interference No. 105,787.
Atkins, Peter, “Chapter 7: Simple Mixtures,” Physical Chemistry, 6th ed., 1997, pp. 176-186.
Barath et al., “Low Dose of Antitumor Agents Prevents Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation After Endothelial Injury,” JACC, 1989, vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 252A.
Bartoli et al., “In vitro and In vivo Antitumoral Activity of Free, and Encapsulated Taxol,” J. Microencapulation, 1990, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 191-197.
Baron et al., “In vitro Evaluation of c7E3-Fab (ReoPro™) Eluting Polymer-Coated Coronary Stents,” Cardiovascular Research, Jun. 2000, vol. 46, pp. 585-594.
BC Lippold, “Retardarzneiformen” in E. Nurnberg, Hagers Handbuch der pharmazeutischen Praxis, vol. 2, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelburg New York, 5th edition, 1991, pp. 832-840.
Brunner, H. et al., “Synthesis and in vitro testing of hematoporphyrin type ligands in platinum (II) complexes as potent cytostatic and phototoxic antitumor agents,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, 1997, vol. 264, pp. 67-79.
Bult, H., “Restenosis: a challenge for pharmacology,” TIPS, Jul. 2000, vol. 21, pp. 274-279.
Consigny, P. Macke et al., “Local Delivery of an antiproliferative drug with use of hydrogel-coated angioplasty balloons,” J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., 1994, vol. 5, pp. 553-560.
Coomber, B. L. et al., “In vitro endothelial wound repair: Interaction of cell migration and proliferation,” Arteriosclerosis, Mar. 1990, vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 215-222.
Cox et al., “Effect of Local Delivery of Heparin and Methotrexate on Neointimal Proliferation in Stendted Porcine Coronary Arteries,” Coronary Artery Disease, 1992, vol. 3, pp. 237-248.
Cremers et al., “V1742—Paclitaxel-beschictete PTCA-Katheter: Gibt es Unterschiede? Einfluss von PACCOCATH and DIOR Ballonkathetern auf die Neointimaporliferation an Schweinekoronarien,” Clin. Res. Cardiol., 1997.
Cremers, B et al., “Comparison of two different paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters in the porcine coronary restenosis model,” Clin. Res. Cardiol., 2009, vol. 98, pp. 325-330.
Dichek, D. A. et al., “Seeding of Intravascular stents with genetically engineered endothelial cells,” Circulation, 1989, vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 1347-1353.
Dordunoo, S. K. et al., “Release of taxol from poly(ε-caprolactone) pastes: effect of water-soluble additives,” Jounral of Controlled Release, 1997, vol. 44, pp. 87-94.
Drachmann et al., “Neoinitimal thickening after stent delivery of paclitaxel: Charge in composition and arrest of growth over six month,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2000, vol. 36, pp. 2325-2332.
Elke M: Kontrastmittel in der radiologischen Diagnostik, pp. 113-119, 3rd edition, Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart New York, 1992.
English Translation of Elke M: Kontrastmittel in der radiologischen Diagnostik, pp. 113-119, 3rd edition, Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart New York, 1992.
Forth, W. et al. “Allegemeine und spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie,” 7 Auflage. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 1996, Chapter, 1, 2, 3.
Garcia-Martinez et al., “Effects of Taxol on Endothelial of the Developing Semilunlar Heart Valves in the Chicken Embryo,” Acta Anat, 1988, vol. 133, pp. 282-288.
Gershlick et al., “Inhibition of Restenosis with a Paclitaxel-Eluting, Polymer-Free Coronary Stent: The European evaluation of pacliTaxel Eluting Stent (ELUTES) Trail,” Circulation, 2004, vol. 109, pp. 487-493.
Gold, Victor et al., “Amount of Substance Concentration,” Compendium of Chemical Technology: International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Recommendations, 1987, p. 19.
Grossmann, S, “Neuartige Zubereitungen Hemmung der Neointimaproliferation in verengten Arterien,” Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades des Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.), Nov. 2006.
Hamm, C. W. et al., “Guideline: Diagnostic Heart Catheter Examination,” Clin Res Cardiol, 2008, vol. 97, pp. 475-512.
English Translation of Hamm, C. W. et al., “Guideline: Diagnostic Heart Catheter Examination,” Clin Res Cardiol, 2008, vol. 97, pp. 475-512.
Hiatt, “Drug-Eluting Stents for the Prevention of Restenosis: In Quest for the Holy Grail,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 55, pp. 409-417, 2002.
Hou, D. et al., “Intrapericardial paclitaxel delivery inhibits neointimal proliferation and promotes arterial enlargement after porcine coronary overstretch,” Circulation, 2000, vol. 102, pp. 1575-1581.
Indolfi et al., “Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation Is Proportional to the Degree of Balloon Injury in a Rat Model of Angioplasty,” Circulation, 1995, vol. 92, pp. 1230-1235.
Kalbitz et al., “Modulation der Wirkstoffpenetration in die Haut,” Pharmazie, 1996, vol. 51, pp. 619-637.
Kandarpa et al., “Mural Delivery of Iloporst with Use of Hydrogel-coated Balloon Catheters Suppresses Local Platelet Aggregation,” J. Vasc. Inter. Radiol., Nov./ Dec. 1997, vol. 8, pp. 997-1004.
Kandarpa et al., “Site-specific Delivery of Iloprost during Experimental Angioplasty Suppresses Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation,”J. Vasc. Inter. Radiol., May/ Jun. 1998, vol. 9, pp. 487-493.
Katsuda et al., “The Role of Cytoplasmic Microtubules in Regulation of Smooth Muscle Proliferation,” Clin. Ter. Cardiovasc.,1990, IX(4), pp. 245-248.
Khan, I. A. et al., “The Intra-vascular stent as a site-specific local drug delivery system,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 2005, vol. 31, pp. 59-78.
Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd Edition, vol. 17, 1982, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 281-310.
Lamba, Nina M. K. et al., “Structure and Physical Characterization of Polyurethanes,” Polyurethanes in Biomedical Applications ,Ch. 4, pp. 43-52, 1998, CRC Press.
Langer, R., “New methods of drug delivery,” Science, Sep. 28, 1990, vol. 249, pp. 1527-1533.
Leo, Albert et al., “Partition Coefficients and Their Uses,” Chemical Reviews, Dec. 1971, vol. 71, No. 6, pp. 525-616.
Liggins, Richard T. et al., “Paclitaxel loaded poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres: properties of microspheres made with low molecular weight polymers,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2001, vol. 222, pp. 19-33.
Liggins, R. T. et al., “Solid-State Characterization of Paclitaxel,”J. Pharma. Sci., 1997, vol. 86, pp. 1458-1463.
Lübbe, A. S. et al., “Preclinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting: Tolerance and Efficacy,” Cancer Research, 1996, vol. 56, pp. 4694-4701.
Manderson et al., “Balloon Catheter Injury to Rabbit Cartoid Artery. I. Changes in smooth muscle phenotype,” Artheriosklerosis, 1989, vol. 9, pp. 289-298.
Matthew, R. T. et al., “Synthesis and Evaluation of Some Water-Soluble Prodrugs and Derivatives of Taxol with Antitumor Activity,” J. Med. Chem., 1992, vol. 35, pp. 141-151.
Mitchel et al., “Inhibition of Platelet Deposition and Lysis of Intrcoronary Thrombus during Balloon Angioplasty using Urokinase-Coated Hydrogel Balloons,” Circulation, Oct. 1994, vol. 90, pp. 1979-1988.
Mortimer, C. et al., Basiswissen Chemie (excerpt) (1987).
Muller et al., “Colchicine and Antineoplastic Therapy for the Prevention of Restenosos after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions,” JACC, 1990, vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 126B-131B.
Nairn, John A., “Polymer Characterization,” Materials Science & Engineering 5473, 2003, Ch. 3, pp. 43-55.
Nicolaou, K. C. et al., “Design, synthesis and biological activity of protaxols,” Nature, Jul. 29, 1993, vol. 364, pp. 464-466.
Parker, Sybil P., “Micelle,” McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Chemistry—Second Edition, 1992, pp. 638-639.
Sangster, J. et al., Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients: Fundamentals and Physical Chemistry, 1997, vol. 2 of Wiley Series in Solution Chemistry, pp. 1-49.
Schmitz, S. A. et al., “Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI of atherosclerotic plaques in Watanabe Hereditable Hyperlipidemic Rabbits,” Investigative Radiology, Aug. 2000, vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 460-471.
Sharma, U. S. et al., “Pharmaceutical and Physical Properties of Paclitaxel (Taxol) Complexes with Cyclodextrins,” J. Pharma. Sci., 1995, vol. 84, pp. 1223-1230.
Slepian, from Textbook of Interventional Cardiology, 1990, Section IV, Chapter 32, pp. 647-670.
Sollott, Steven J. et al., “Taxol Inhibits Neointimal Smooth Muscle Cell accumulation after angioplasty in the rat,” The Journal of clinical Investigation, Apr. 1995, vol. 95, pp. 1869-1876.
Speck, Ulrich—German Priority Document for file No. 101 15 740.1 filed on Mar. 26, 2001.
Swindell, C.S. et al., “Biologically Active Taxol Analogues with Deleted A-ring Side Chain Substituents and Variable C-2′ Configurations,” J. Med. Chem, 1991, vol. 34, pp. 1176-1184.
Tarr, B. D. et al., “A New Parenteral Vehicle for the Administration of Some Poorly Water Soluble Anti-Cancer Drugs,” J. Parent Sci. Technol., 1987, vol. 41, pp. 31-33.
Tawashi, R. “The dissolution rates of crystalline drugs,” J. Mond. Pharm. 1968, vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 371-379.
Ulicky, L. et al., “Nernst's Distribution Law,” Comprehensive Dictionary of Physical Chemistry, pp. 266-267, 1992.
Van Belle, E. et al., “Passivation of metallic stents after arterial gene transfer of phVEGF165 inhibits thrombus formation and intimal thickening,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 1997, vol. 29, pp. 1371-1379.
Voigt, R., Lehrbuch der pharmazeutishchen Technologie, 5th edition, VEB Verlag Volk and Gesundheit Berlin, 1984, p. 689.
Voisard et al., “The In-vitro Effect of Antineoplastic Agents on Proliferative Activity and Cytoskeletal Components of Plaque-Derived Smooth-Muscle Cells from Human Coronary Arteries,” Coronary Artery Disease, 1993, vol. 4, pp. 935-942.
Wichert, B et al., “Low Molecular weight PLA: a suitable polymer for pulmonary administered microparticles?” J. Microencapsulation, 1993, vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 195-207.
Yushmanov, Victor E. et al., “Dipyridamole Interacts with the Polar Part of Cationic Reversed Micelles in Chloroform: 1H NMR and ESR Evidence,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1997, vol. 191, pp. 384-390.
Clinical Cardiology Divergent Effects on Coronary Artery Disease: Abstract from 70th Scientific Session: Circulation, vol. 96, No. 8, Oct. 21, 1997.
Abstracts From the 70th Scientific Sessions, Circulation, Oct. 21, 1997, 96 Suppl. 1: 1-288.
English Abstract of CN 1 224 622, Aug. 4, 1999.
English Abstract of DE 19514104, Stemberger, Axel, DR., “Coating for bio-material insertable into the bloodstream or tissue of the human body,” Nov. 28, 1996.
English Abstract of DE 69925936, Stemberger, Axel, DR., “High efficiency local drug delivery,” May 11, 2006.
English Abstract of DE 4435652, Stemberger, Axel DR., “Coating for bio-material to be used e.g. as sutures,” Apr. 11, 1996.
English Abstract of EP 0 551 182, Morris, R. E. et al., “Method of treating hyperproliferative vascular disease using rapamycin, eventually in combination with mycophenolic acid,” Jul. 14, 1993.
English Abstract of JP-06-063145, “Balloon Catheter for intravascular dosing,” Buaayu KK, Patent Abstracts of Japan, Publication Date: Mar. 8, 1994.
English Abstract of JP-06-063145, “Balloon Catheter for Intravascular dosing,” Buaayu KK, Thomson Innovation, Publication Date: Mar. 8, 1994.
English abstract of JP-07-500585, Thomson Innovation, Patent Record View, Publication Date: Jan. 19, 1995.
English Abstract of JP-07-328124, “Medicine dosing catheter,” Terumo Corp., Patent Abstracts of Japan, Publication Date: Dec. 19, 1995.
English abstract of JP-10-509691, Thomson Innovation, Patent Record View, Publication Date: Sep. 22, 1998.
English Abstract of JP-11-012160, Jan. 19, 1999.
English Translation of JP 36371777, Thomson Innovation, Publication Date: Mar. 23, 2005.
Patent Family Listing for JP-2001 508320 (Publication Date: Jun. 26, 2001), Thomson Innovation.
Patent Family Listing for JP-2002 536058 (Publication Date: Oct. 29, 2002), Thomson Innovation.
English Abstract of WO 92/20718, Nov. 26, 1992.
English Abstract of WO 96/25282, Kaufmann, G. et al., “Process for producing a plastic cladding component and cladding component produced especially by said process,” Aug. 22, 1996.
Office Action issued Apr. 20, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/618,977, filed Jul. 14, 2003.
Office Action issued Oct. 13, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,116.
Office Action issued Aug. 16, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,420.
Office Action issued Feb. 16, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/782,989.
English translation of Decision of Final Rejection, Japanese Application No. JP 2004-235694, issued Mar. 9, 2010.
Office Action issued Feb. 22, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,577.
Notice of Allowance issued Aug. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,577.
Notice of Allowance issued Dec. 9, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,577.
Notice of Allowance issued Nov. 28, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,577.
Notice of Allowance issued Jun. 25, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/528,577.
Office Action issued May 25, 2012 in US U.S. Appl. No. 12/782,989.
Office Action issued Mar. 9, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,420.
Notice of Allowance issued May 24, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/835,420.
Office Action issued Apr. 29, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,116.
Office Action issued Sep. 18, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,116.
Office Action issued Apr. 8, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,116.
Office Action issued May 7, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,116.
Decision of the Opposition Division Regarding EP 1 666 070 dated Mar. 7, 2011; 25 pgs.
Opposition against EP 1 666 070 B1 dated Oct. 12, 1999; 30 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 08/062,451, filed May 13, 1993, Kunz et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 08/094,536, filed Jul. 19, 1993, Hunter et al.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100278744 A1 Nov 2010 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11763125 Jun 2007 US
Child 12835414 US
Parent 10472844 US
Child 11763125 US