The present disclosure belongs to the technical field of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), and in particular relates to a preparation method for high-purity iron phosphate and use thereof.
A cathode material is the most important component of an LIB. Lithium iron phosphate (LFP, LiFePO4) with an olivine structure has many advantages such as high theoretical capacity, high safety, environmental friendliness, and low cost. As a cathode material for LIBs, LFP is favored by researchers and the market in the field of energy storage. As a precursor of an LFP cathode material, FePO4 can be used for large-scale production of highly-compacted LiFePO4, and its quality and cost will directly impact the performance and cost of an LFP battery. At present, iron phosphate is mainly prepared by the technical method of co-precipitation, where a by-product ferrous sulfate of titanium dioxide production, a phosphorus source, an alkali liquor, an oxidant, and the like are used as raw materials; and the alkali liquor is used to adjust a pH, and iron phosphate is precipitated at a suitable pH. The conventional preparation method generally includes the two stages of reaction and aging, and the reaction stage requires relatively high temperature and energy consumption. However, in a preparation process, the adjustment of a pH of a system is easy to introduce impurities into a product (a purity of iron phosphate in the prior art is generally difficult to exceed 99%), and leads to a relatively high cost and a complicated process. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a new process to improve the physical and chemical indexes of a product, and the performance indexes of the product meet the preparation requirements of LFP batteries.
The following is a summary of the subjects described in detail in the present disclosure. The present summary is not intended to limit the scope of protection of the claims.
The present disclosure provides a preparation method for high-purity iron phosphate and use thereof. The preparation method involves cheap raw materials, leads to less waste, and requires a low temperature, which can effectively reduce the energy consumption cost. In addition, iron phosphate prepared by the preparation method has a purity of 99.8% or more.
To achieve the above objective, the present disclosure adopts the following technical solutions:
A preparation method for iron phosphate is provided, including the following steps:
Preferably, in step (1), the iron phosphide waste may include at least one selected from the group consisting of Fe, Fe3O4, FeP, and Fe2P; and more preferably, the iron phosphide waste may include a mixture of FeP and Fe2P.
Preferably, in step (1), the acid liquor may be at least two selected from the group consisting of nitric acid, sulfuric acid, and hydrochloric acid.
Further preferably, the acid liquor may be a mixture of nitric acid and sulfuric acid, and a molar ratio of the nitric acid to the sulfuric acid may be 1:(0.5-5).
More preferably, the molar ratio of the nitric acid to the sulfuric acid may be 1:(0.5-2).
Preferably, in step (1), the oxidant may be at least one selected from the group consisting of hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, nitric acid, and sodium persulfate.
Further preferably, the oxidant may be one selected from the group consisting of hydrogen peroxide and oxygen.
Preferably, in step (1), the adsorbent may be one selected from the group consisting of activated carbon, graphite, carbon molecular sieve, and zeolite molecular sieve.
Further preferably, the adsorbent may be activated carbon or graphite.
Preferably, in step (1), a speed of the stirring may be 300 rpm to 500 rpm, and more preferably, the speed of the stirring may be 350 rpm to 450 rpm.
Preferably, in step (1), the heating for leaching may be conducted at 80° C. to 100° C. for 2 h to 6 h; and further preferably, the heating for leaching may be conducted at 90° C. to 100° C. for 2 h to 3 h.
Preferably, in step (2), the alkali liquor may be at least one selected from the group consisting of a NaOH solution, a KOH solution, aqueous ammonia, a urea solution, NH4Cl, NH4HCO3, Na2CO3, and NaHCO3.
Further preferably, the alkali liquor may be one selected from the group consisting of a NaOH solution, aqueous ammonia, and a urea solution.
Preferably, in step (2), the pH may be adjusted to 2.5 to 5; and further preferably, the pH may be adjusted to 3.5 to 4.5.
Preferably, in step (2), the temperature may be held at 80° C. to 100° C. for 2 h to 4 h; and further preferably, the temperature may be held at 85° C. to 95° C. for 2 h to 3 h.
Preferably, in step (2), the heat treatment may be conducted at 400° C. to 650° C. for 2 h to 4 h.
Further preferably, the heat treatment may be conducted at 450° C. to 550° C. for 2 h to 4 h.
Preferably, in step (2), an oxidant for the heat treatment may be air.
Preferably, in step (3), the surfactant may be at least one selected from the group consisting of sodium dodecyl benzenesulfonate (SDBS), polyethylene glycol (PEG), sodium dodecyl sulfonate, and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP).
Further preferably, the surfactant may be at least one selected from the group consisting of SDBS and PEG.
Preferably, in step (3), the high-energy ball-milling may be conducted for 0.5 h to 3 h; and further preferably, the high-energy ball-milling may be conducted for 1 h to 1.5 h.
Preferably, in step (3), a device used for the high-energy ball-milling may be a high-energy ball-milling machine.
The high-energy ball-milling is conducted to pre-activate the slurry, enhance the activity of the iron source (iron oxide), reduce the reaction activation energy, and induce a low-temperature chemical reaction.
Preferably, in step (4), pure water with a temperature of 85° C. to 100° C. may be filled in an extraction tank used in the extraction; and further preferably, the pure water may have a temperature of 90° C. to 95° C.
Preferably, in step (4), the extracting agent may be one selected from the group consisting of tributyl phosphate (TBP), isopropyl ether (IPE), isopropyl alcohol (IPA), isoamyl alcohol, n-butanol, and dibutyl sulfoxide (DBSO).
Further preferably, the extracting agent may be one selected from the group consisting of TBP, IPA, and n-butanol.
Preferably, in step (4), a mass ratio of the extracting agent to the phosphoric acid may be 1:(3-6); and further preferably, the mass ratio of the extracting agent to the phosphoric acid may be 1:(4.5-5.5).
Preferably, in step (4), the extraction may be conducted at 50° C. to 80° C. for 10 min to 120 min; and further preferably, the extraction may be conducted at 60° C. to 70° C. for 40 min to 70 min.
Preferably, in step (4), the acid liquor may be sulfuric acid, which is configured to increase an extraction yield; and an amount of the sulfuric acid added may be 1% to 3% of a mass of an extracted organic phase.
Preferably, step (4) may further include subjecting the phosphoric acid to concentration to obtain refined concentrated phosphoric acid.
Further preferably, the concentration may be conducted at 85° C. to 105° C. for 2 h to 10 h; and further preferably, the concentration may be conducted at 95° C. to 100° C. for 5 h to 8 h.
Preferably, in step (5), a molar ratio of Fe in the iron oxide to P in the phosphoric acid may be 1:(1-2); and further preferably, the molar ratio of Fe in the iron oxide to P in the phosphoric acid may be 1:(1.4-1.7).
Preferably, in step (5), the heating may be conducted at 50° C. to 80° C., and a Fe content in a liquid phase obtained by the SLS may be less than or equal to 20 mg/L; and further preferably, the heating may be conducted at 60° C. to 70° C., and the Fe content in the liquid phase may be less than or equal to 10 mg/L.
Preferably, in step (5), the washing may be conducted as follows: pulping the solid in a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:(10-15) g/L, filtering, and rinsing a resulting filter cake with pure water in a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:10 g/L until the electric conductivity is ≤500 μs/cm.
Preferably, in step (5), the sintering may be conducted as follows: in an atmosphere created by one or more selected from the group consisting of air and nitrogen, sintering at 200° C. to 350° C. for 1 h to 3 h, heating to 500° C. to 650° C., and sintering for 2 h to 3 h.
Preferably, in step (5), the iron phosphate may have an impurity content of less than or equal to 0.10%; and further preferably, the iron phosphate may have an impurity content of less than or equal to 0.05%.
Preferably, in step (5), the iron phosphate may have D50 of 2 μm to 6 μm, a tap density of 0.80 g/cm3 to 1.30 g/cm3, and a specific surface area (SSA) of 4 m2/g to 8 m2/g.
The present disclosure also provides use of the preparation method described above in the preparation of a battery material.
Compared with the prior art, the present disclosure has the following beneficial effects.
Other aspects can be understood after reading and understanding the drawings and detailed description.
The drawings are intended to provide a further understanding of the technical solution herein and form part of the Specification, together with embodiments of the present disclosure, to explain the technical solution herein and do not constitute a limitation of the technical solution of the present disclosure.
The concepts and technical effects of the present disclosure are clearly and completely described below in conjunction with examples, so as to allow the objectives, features and effects of the present disclosure to be fully understood. Apparently, the described examples are merely some rather than all of the examples of the present disclosure. All other examples obtained by those skilled in the art based on the examples of the present disclosure without creative efforts should fall within the protection scope of the present disclosure.
A preparation method for high-purity iron phosphate was provided in this example, specifically including the following steps:
A preparation method for high-purity iron phosphate was provided in this example, specifically including the following steps:
A preparation method for high-purity iron phosphate was provided in this example, specifically including the following steps:
A preparation method for iron phosphate was provided in this comparative example, specifically including the following steps:
Table 1 shows impurity element contents in the iron phosphate products prepared in Examples 1, 2, and 3, the prepared iron oxide, and the commercially-available Yacheng iron phosphate, the iron phosphate products prepared in Comparative Example 1. Specific data were obtained by an inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) instrument. It can be seen from Table 1 that there are many impurities in the prepared iron oxide raw material; and since the preparation method of the present disclosure does not change the pH of the system and the impurity elements are not precipitated with the iron phosphate, the impurity content in each of the iron phosphate products prepared in the examples is significantly lower than that in the commercially-available standard, indicating that this preparation method can greatly purify iron phosphate and improve the physical and chemical indexes of the product.
The anhydrous iron phosphate prepared in Examples 1 to 3 and the commercially-available Yacheng iron phosphate were each prepared into LFP by a conventional method under the same conditions, and the compaction density and other electrical performances were determined for the prepared LFP. Results were shown in Table 2 below.
The LFP powders prepared from the anhydrous iron phosphate prepared in Examples 1 to 3 of the present disclosure exhibited a compaction density and electrical performances close to those of LFP prepared from the commercially-available iron phosphate, indicating that the iron phosphate prepared in the present disclosure meets the standards of battery-grade anhydrous iron phosphate for LFP, and has performance even exceeding that of the commercially-available iron phosphate.
The examples of present disclosure are described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, but the present disclosure is not limited to the above examples. Within the scope of knowledge possessed by those of ordinary skill in the technical field, various changes can also be made without departing from the purpose of the present disclosure. In addition, the examples and features in the examples in the present disclosure may be combined with each other in a non-conflicting situation.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
202210105458.8 | Jan 2022 | CN | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2022/135791 | 12/1/2022 | WO |