Preparation of friction elements and compositions therefor

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to new technology and insights which when practiced make possible more efficient and reliable manufacture of molded friction elements for automotive disc brakes, truck brakes, and other friction applications. More specifically, this invention relates to methods for the conversion of the loose, bulky and dusty mixtures as currently used for the manufacture of these friction elements into a more desirable state, namely: densified, cylindrical, rod-like particles possessing physical integrity together with sufficient surface area to enable practical preheating with pressurized gas at elevated temperature immediately prior to mold charging. This results in the production of molded friction elements of better quality and with greater efficiency than previously possible.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Currently, molded friction elements as installed in vehicle brake systems are molded from a blended mixture of friction ingredients that are loose, bulky and dusty blends of resinous binders, reinforcing fibers, friction and wear controlling agents and inexpensive fillers. The mix is loose, bulky and dusty because the ingredients are in the form of fine powders, small and larger granules and fibers.
Powdered phenolic thermosetting resins are the binder of choice for a variety of braking applications. These heat resistant resins serve to bond the other ingredients into a solid, infusible mass when molded to final shape under the effects of heat and pressure. The reinforcing fibers are used to impart physical strength, heat stability and, to a limited extent, friction properties to the finished element. The friction and wear controlling agents are typically granules and powders of carbonaceous materials which impart and maintain the friction level and wear resistance. The inexpensive fillers are generally powdered minerals used to fill space and enhance some properties.
The formulas of the compositions used to make friction elements for specific applications are usually developed experimentally, confirmed by testing and, to a considerable extent, are held confidential. However, generally accepted volume ranges for the various friction ingredients in the compositions are as follows:
______________________________________ % VolumeFriction Ingredient general preferred______________________________________Binders 10-35 20-30Reinforcing Fibers 0-50 5-25Friction & Wear Controlling Agents 20-80 35-45Fillers 20-70 20-30______________________________________
As a general rule, the binder content of a friction element is kept to a minimum. No more binder resin is used than is necessary to sufficiently bond the other ingredients into a solid, infusible mass when molded under heat and pressure. The minimum binder volume required will be determined by the types of friction ingredients used and, to a large extent, by the processes used to manufacture the final friction element.
Binder content is minimized because the organic resins used may be subjected to temperatures above their decomposition points. Partial decomposition of the binder at high service temperatures results in the formation of gases at the friction interface which lowers the element's braking effectiveness. This loss in effectiveness at elevated temperatures is referred to as brake "fade". The greater the element's binder content, the greater the effects of brake fade. Also, binders traditionally comprise a large percentage of the friction element's cost which provides an additional incentive to reduce its content.
The general process for the production of friction elements is described as follows: the desired amounts of the powdered binder resin, fibers, fillers and other ingredients are dry mixed. The bulk density of the resulting dry mix, which is a loose, bulky, dusty mass of powder, is less than half that of the molded element's final density. The mix must be carefully handled to avoid settling and separation of its powdered, granular, and fibrous ingredients.
It is current industry practice to first produce from the loose, bulky, dusty dry mix, prior to molding and at room temperature, a fragile preform in the near net shape of the final friction element. The preforms are made to the near net shape of the final element because, as a minimum amount of binder is used in friction elements to avoid brake fade, the dry mix has a very low propensity to flow and uniformly fill the mold cavity when heat and pressure is applied. The low resin content also results in weak and easily broken preforms which must be specially and carefully handled when transferred to a heated mold cavity for forming into final shape. The hot, pressurized molding step causes the resinous binder to melt, flow and coat the material's fillers. The thermosetting resin then crosslinks and cures to an infusible state. After ejection from the hot mold, the element may be cured further in an oven. When cool, the friction element is machined to final size, catalogued and packaged for market.
Preforming the dry mix prior to hot press molding helps eliminate some, but not all, of the unwanted air that can otherwise be trapped within the friction element. As the thermosetting resin crosslinks and cures during the molding step, gaseous byproducts such as water vapor and ammonia are produced. These vapors, along with the trapped air in the preform, will, if retained within the molding, result in unacceptable defects in the form of blisters, voids and delaminations in the final friction element.
In an effort to avoid such defects, it is current industry practice to frequently open the hot mold cavity during molding to allow the entrapped vapors to escape. The mold cavity is then closed and pressure reapplied so the fissures and delaminations created by the escaping vapors are sealed. This repeated opening and closing of the mold cavity is termed "breathing" or "bumping" the press. Press "bumping" cycles are continued until the binder has hardened so that the described defects will not result when the element is ejected from the mold.
Press bumping must be carefully and correctly timed so the resin has enough flow and reactivity to completely seal the voids and delaminations created by the escaping vapors. These delaminations and unsealed fissures will diminish the physical integrity of the element. Also, partially sealed fissures may delaminate when the element experiences rapid frictional heating during service. This problem has led to recalls of friction elements. Thus, press breathing, while employed to reduce defects, is time consuming, lowers productivity, and also causes product quality uncertainty.
The negative factors involved with the current methods of manufacturing friction elements can be circumvented by transforming the loose, bulky, dusty mix into a dense, regular geometry that lends itself to preheating prior to mold charging. As preheating starts the binder's curing reaction before the mixture is placed in the mold much less time is required to cure the mass of material to an infusible state. Thus, preheating the mixture is highly desirable because preheating enables more rapid molding cycles. In addition, the number of required press "bumps" may be reduced or even eliminated by preheating the charge of friction ingredients.
While high frequency radio waves, or oscillating magnetic fields, may be used to preheat specific friction material compositions, hot pressurized gas preheat systems appear to be the most economical and universally available method for preheating friction ingredients of all types. The inability to uniformly preheat conventional preforms of dry mixed friction ingredients with hot gas systems results from the mix's low density and subsequent low thermoconductivity. As heat transfer from the surface to the center is poor, simple convection or forced air ovens quickly heat and cure the binder on a preform's surface while its interior remains cool. Thus, no advantage is realized by hot gas preheating materials produced by the currently practiced dry mix preform method.
Preheating with hot, pressurized gas, requires that the friction material mix be densified in some way to improve its thermoconductivity. However, the densified particles must not be manufactured in a way that reduces the binder's plasticity to a point where the material will not flow and fuse during hot press molding. Also, as the goal is to manufacture friction elements as efficiently as possible, extra manufacturing steps such as filtering, drying, pressing, grinding or classification, which add cost and complexity to the process, should be avoided. In addition, the size and shape of the densified mix must be such that open channels are formed within a material charge to allow the hot gas to freely flow throughout all parts of the charge to assure uniform preheat.
In using hot gas preheat systems, it must be noted that while very hot air would quickly heat the friction material charge prior to molding, the preheat air must not precure the binder on the surface of a densified particle before adequately heating the interior. Therefore, while the initial thermal gradient from the particle's surface to its center must be relatively low, fast efficient preheat may be obtained by minimizing that distance. However, the particles must not be so small that they are carried away by the gas stream creating dust, or pack in a way to minimize the size of the open channels or cause large channels to form through which most of the preheat air preferentially flows.
A number of methods have been proposed for densifying a mix of friction ingredients. These methods include adding liquid solvents or cements, subjecting the mix to agglomeration techniques, or by extruding or pressing the mix followed by pulverization into a granular material. However, when put into practice these densification methods have been found to be ineffective, mainly because they add costly and complicated drying, recovery, pressing, grinding or screening steps to the manufacturing process. In addition, the densified particles obtained by these methods vary in size from inches in diameter down to small grains. The large particle size distribution results in dust generation and hinders uniform preheating with hot gas because the smaller particles quickly heat while the larger particles remain much cooler.
Thus, the problem lies in how to prepare the friction material mixtures in a way to make preheating with pressurized gas viable. We find that uncured friction material compositions formed into dense, cylindrical rod-like particles satisfies the requirements needed for efficient preheating with pressurized gas. The unique shape of the rod-like particles allows the diameter of the particle to be minimized while the length allows for the formation of a homogeneous matrix of air channels within a charge of particles. These rod-like particles are made to regular and uniform diameters on the order of 3/32" to 1/4". If the densified particles are not of the same approximate size, smaller particles will quickly heat and precure while larger particles remain unaffected resulting in a nonuniform preheat which is undesirable. The length of the rod-like particle may vary as length is more critical to particle integrity than to preheat uniformity. We have found lengths of 1/8" to 3/4" to be ideal for this purpose.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of preheating particles of a friction material composition and molding those particles with compression and heating into friction elements.
It is an object of the invention to provide particles of friction materials which can be readily preheated and compression molded to form superior friction elements.
It is a further object to disclose novel mixtures of friction materials that can be used to form the desired particles.
We have discovered that dense, regular, cylindrical, rod-like particles of friction ingredients having diameters of from about 3/32" (about 0.20 cm) to about 1/4" (about 0.60 cm); lengths from about 1/8" (about 0.30 cm) to about 1" (about 2.5 cm); and, densities greater than about 70% of the density of the final friction element can easily be preheated and compressed with heat to form superior friction elements.
The geometry of the rod-like particles allows fast preheating by minimizing the distance from the surface of the particles to its interior while being sturdy enough to secure all of the ingredients in place. Also, being of a regular rod-like shape, the particles naturally create and maintain large open channels or passageways so all of the particles have free access to the heated air for fast, efficient and uniform preheating with pressurized gas. When preheated, the particles maintain their free-flowing nature to allow for quick and easy charging of the hot press mold cavity eliminating any need to preform. The uniformity of the preheating of these particles allows for the reduction or elimination of press breathing and for faster molding cycles thereby improving productivity as previously described. In addition, by retaining the plasticity of the particles during densification, the flow of the friction material in the pressurized mold is dramatically improved.
We also have discovered that unexpectedly the combination of regular, rod-like particles and uniform preheating allows lower binder amounts to be used to produce uniform friction elements with unique and desirable friction properties accruing from the lower binder content.
It has heretofore been impractical to extrude friction ingredient mixtures or compositions under pressure into the form of our desired particles because the friction properties of the materials cause the temperature of the extrusion die and associated equipment to quickly reach the cure temperature of the resin binder. As the curing of the resin occurs, a slow buildup of cured friction material on the screws, barrels or extrusion die develops. This has a dramatic and undesirable effect on the maintenance of desired rheological properties and the continued production of useable material. When such buildup occurs the process must be aborted to prevent damage to the equipment or to avoid production of costly unusable material.
We have now discovered that friction ingredient mixtures or compositions in which a small amount of the solid, heat resistant resin binder is replaced with a temperature controlling additive, preferably a thermosetting liquid resin, permits particles of the desired geometry to be made.
The liquid resin apparently lowers the temperature necessary to achieve extrusion rheology of the mix thereby reducing the frictional heat created during extrusion. Thus, the rod-like particles can be produced without the build-up of cured friction material on the production equipment which frequently accompanies such extrusion processes when the compositions do not contain a temperature controlling additive. In addition, using the preferred additive, which is a coreactive, heat resistant liquid phenolic resin, does not introduce any new ingredients into the friction composition which could alter the frictional properties of the finished element during use. Preferably only enough liquid resin is used to maintain the processing temperature below the curing temperature of the solid resin binder. Excess amounts of the liquid resin can diminish the particle's integrity resulting in poor material yields. In addition, any residual liquid may require the addition of costly drying procedures. Furthermore, we have found that the same amount of liquid resin which provides the desired temperature control also enables the formation of particles of the desired density for preheating.
Preferably, the cylindrical rod-like particles contain no more than 15% by weight of material smaller than 60 mesh and they have diameters of 1/8" to 5/32" with lengths from 1/8" to 1". The cylindrical rod-like particle's size is determined by the diameter of the orifice used to extrude the mix while its length is controlled by knocking the nascent rod-like particle from the die's surface at a specified distance or after a certain time. These preferred particles allow for fast preheating by lowering the interior to surface distance while being sturdy enough to secure all of the ingredients in place. Large channels are formed between the cylindrical rod-like particles to allow for uniform preheating with hot air systems with little or no dust contamination to the surroundings. When preheated to a temperature between about 150.degree. F. to about 375.degree. F., the cylindrical rod-like particles maintain their free flowing nature to allow for quick and easy charging of the hot press mold cavity. The plasticity of the binders is retained during densification and, as a result of preheating and improved utilization of the binder, the flow of the material under pressure is dramatically improved. Thus lower overall binder amounts may be used to produce quality friction materials.
The preheated cylindrical rod-like particles can be formed into friction elements by introducing a predetermined amount of such particles into a mold for a friction element and compression molding them under heat and pressure at temperatures of about 250.degree. F. to about 500.degree. F. or more and under pressures of about at least 700 psi and up to or more than 6000 psi until the resin is infusible.
The uncured rod-like particles of the invention also provide for manufacturing friction elements from mixtures of different types of rod-like particles. These unique moldings exhibit synergistic properties which result from combining different friction materials where one or more of the materials are shaped into the uncured, rod-like particles of the invention prior to molding the friction element.
It will be further apparent to those skilled in the art from the description of the preferred embodiment and the examples that the above stated objects are obtained by the present invention and that the practice of the present invention has significant advantages over current commercial industry practices.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
The preferred friction ingredient compositions of the present invention have the following general formula:
______________________________________ % Weight______________________________________Thermosetting Resin Binder 10 to 30%Temperature Controlling Agent 0.5 to 10%Reinforcing Fillers 5 to 50%Organic Fillers 0 to 60%Inorganic Fillers 5 to 50%______________________________________
Many heat resistant thermosetting resins may be used as the binder in the practice of this invention. These resins include unmodified phenol-aldehyde resins, alkyl modified or inorganic modified phenol-aldehyde resins, epoxy resins, polyimide resins and many others as described throughout the patent literature.
For most applications, unmodified phenolic resins of the novolac type are preferred. The novolac resin is produced by controlling the reaction of phenol and formaldehyde in the presence of an acid catalyst. However, the amount of formaldehyde employed is maintained at a level which is insufficient to completely form a cured crosslinked structure. These resins are thermoplastic and at room temperature are solid and brittle. To complete the curing or crosslinking reaction, a hardening agent, hexamethylene-tetramine (hexa) is added. Hexa is a dry crystalline reaction product of ammonia and formaldehyde. When the mixture is heated in the mold, the hexa decomposes and forms crosslinking bridges of carbon and some nitrogen between the novolac molecules to cure the product into an infusible mass.
A variety of agents can be used to control the temperature of the mix as it is being formed into the rod-like particles. Representative agents are furfural, diphenyl oxide, furfuryl alcohol, polymers of hydroxymethylfuran, and water oil emulsions. However, the preferred agent is a liquid phenolic resin resole which is prepared by reacting phenol with formaldehyde in the present of an alkali or alkaline earth metal hydroxide or equivalent. One such resin is commercially available from Plastics Engineering Corporation under the trade name PLENCO 12194.
The reinforcing fillers are generally fibers such as asbestos, glass, ceramic, mineral, steel, brass, copper, or heat resistant organics such as aromatic polyamides or acrylic. The organic fillers may include particles from cashew nutshell oil resins, polymerized or partially polymerized, or elastomers in the form of virgin rubbers together with their vulcanizing and accelerating agents or polymerized rubber particles from scrap. The inorganic fillers include carbonaceous materials such as graphites and cokes, metallic powders from iron, brass, copper or zinc, or mineral fillers such as barium sulfate, kyanite, aluminum oxides, marble white, rottenstone, vermiculite, talcs and clays to name a few.
An especially preferred friction resistant compositions of an "organic" type friction material and a "semimetallic" type friction material have the following formulas:
______________________________________ % weight "organic" "semimetallic"______________________________________Powdered Phenolic Novolac Resin 14 7Liquid Phenolic Resole Resin 1 3Heat Resistant Fibers 25 28Nitrile Rubber 5 2Ground Rubber Particles 10 0Cashew Resin Particles 5 2Graphites and Cokes 10 20Metal Powders 5 28Mineral Fillers 25 10______________________________________
Each of the ingredients mentioned above are readily available.
EXAMPLES
The invention is further illustrated by the following examples, wherein all parts are by weight, unless otherwise specified. Example 1 illustrates the preparation of a preferred friction resistant composition; Example 2 illustrates the preferred particle forming method; Example 14 illustrates the method of molding elements of the preferred composition and Example 15, 16, & 17 illustrate the method of improving the properties of the molded friction elements.
EXAMPLE 1
Preparation of Friction Ingredient Composition
The following raw materials were blended in a mixer to form a dry mix of the preferred friction ingredient composition.
______________________________________ % Weight______________________________________Powdered Phenolic Novolac Binder Resin 14Liquid Phenolic Resole Resin 1Ceramic Fiber 22Mineral Fiber 8Cashew Nutshell Resin 6Nitrile Rubber with cure system 6Ground Rubber Scrap (-20 mesh) 6Brass Chips (-20 mesh) 3.5Zinc Stearate (mold release) 0.5Barium Sulfate 30______________________________________
EXAMPLE 2
Preparation of Rod-Like Particles
The dry mix of ingredients obtained in Example 1 was fed into the compression zone of a roller-die compression extruder, such as a Sprout Waldron Pellet Mill. Pressure was applied and quality-rod like particles with a density near 80% their final molded density were obtained. The particles had regular diameters of 1/8" with lengths on the order of 1/8" to 1/2".
EXAMPLE 3
The Preparation of Rod-Like Particles of Semimetallic Friction Ingredients Without Temperature Control Agent
Into a Littleford Mixer was placed the following ingredients:
______________________________________Phenolic Novolac Binder Resin 62 lbsNitrile Rubber 17 lbsSteel Fiber 260 lbsBarium Sulfate 97 lbsAluminum Oxide 7 lbsIron Powder 260 lbsGraphite 140 lbs______________________________________
This mixture was blended until it was thoroughly mixed, then fed to the extruder of Example 2. After approximately ten minutes, the temperature of the particles exiting the unit exceeded 300.degree. F. and the mill ceased functioning. The experiment was stopped to avoid damaging the unit. Attempts to mold the resulting particles resulted in moldings in which the particles would not flow together. The resulting molding crumbled in hand and exhibited no strength.
EXAMPLE 4
The Properties of Rod-Like Particles of Semimetallic Friction Ingredients with Temperature Control Agent
The blending procedure of Example 3 was repeated except that during the blending 3.3% by weight of a liquid phenolic resin resole (PLENCO 12194) was slowly added to the mixture. This resole is composed of approximately 75% by weight of resin in a water solution and an equal weight of the powdered novolac resin binder was omitted from the mix. When blending was completed, the mixture was passed through the extruder of Example 3, but this time the material was extruded into shape easily with no trace of curing. The temperature of the exiting particles never exceeded 230.degree. F. and when molded filled the test mold completely. When molded as explained in Example 8 and 9, the rod-like particles showed excellent hole filling ability and excellent adhesion.
EXAMPLE 5
Preservation of Compound Reactivity
Two friction materials, one generally referred to as a semimetallic and the other generally referred to as a non-asbestos organic material were prepared from the following formulas:
______________________________________Semi-Metallic Friction Material CompositionIngredient % Weight______________________________________Resin 8.5PLENCO 12194 3.0Rubber 1.5Cashew Particles 1.2Graphite 13.5Petroleum Coke 5.3Barytes 11.5Steel Fiber 27.5Iron Powder 28.0______________________________________
______________________________________Non-Asbestos Organic (NAO) Friction MaterialIngredient % Weight______________________________________Resin 8.0PLENCO 12194 1.0Rubber 5.0Mineral Fibers 14.5Graphite 5.5Petroleum Coke 4.0Barytes 28.0Copper Powder 34.0______________________________________
A charge of a metallic stearate equal to 0.5% of the total batch weight was added to the above formulas. In applications as a mold release agent, metallic stearates, such as calcium stearate and zinc stearate, have proven satisfactory. One such metallic stearate is commercially available from Plastics Engineering Company under the trade name PLENCO 10915. Metallic stearates have not been shown to affect the wear and friction performance of friction materials when used at this low level.
The formulas were thoroughly mixed in a Littleford blender and a sample of each dry mix was set aside. The remaining material was processed into rod-like particles according to the invention previously described.
The degree of reactivity of the Littleford dry mix and the processed rod-like particles is checked by extracting compound samples with tetrahydrofuran (THF) in an apparatus commonly referred to as a Soxhlet extractor. As uncured resins are extracted from the compound sample the greater the extractable amount, the more reactive the sample. The extractable percentage of the sample is defined by the following equation:
Percent Extractable=100.times.(Wt. Before-Wt. After)/Wt. Before
Wt. Before=weight of sample before extraction
Wt. After=weight of sample after extraction
The dry mix and processed rod-like particles of the non-asbestos organic and semimetallic materials were tested for percent extractable by the method described. The results are shown in the following figures:
______________________________________ Dry Rod-Like Mix Particles______________________________________Non-asbestos Organic% THF Extractable 10.2 10.2Semimetallic% THF Extractable 10.0 10.4______________________________________
Materials made without adequate temperature control agent have shown dramatic reductions in percent extractables and thus a lowering of reactivity. Non-asbestos organic and semimetallic formulas identical to the ones described above were processed with water in place of the resole. As the following extraction results show, omitting the resole resulted in particles of lower reactivity. In the case of the semimetallic formula, the reactivity is considerably reduced.
______________________________________ % THF Extractable Dry Rod-Like Mix Particles______________________________________NAOWith Resole 23.4 23.4Without Resole 23.2 22.5SemimetallicWith Resole 7.0 6.1Without Resole 6.9 3.6______________________________________
From these results, it may be concluded that the particle forming process does not significantly effect the reactivity of the friction compounds when the resole is used.
EXAMPLE 6
Improved Preform Shape Retention
Preforms in the shape of disc brake pads suitable for a Ford F-250 pickup truck, (FMSI #D-120), 0.700" tall with a surface area of 12.8 in.sup.2 were formed from both the Littleford mix sample and the rod-like particles of the non-asbestos organic and semimetallic materials described in Example 5.
The preforms were formed under 3,000 psi surface pressure and pressed for 10 seconds. The thickness of the preforms was measured immediately after removal from the mold, after being left to stand for three hours, and again after three days.
The average percent thickness increase of the preforms was calculated. The results are shown in the following tables.
______________________________________D-120 Preform % Thickness Increase Dry Mix Rod-Like Particles Average Std. Dev. Average Std. Dev.______________________________________NAO FormulaAfter 3 hours 6.4 2.1 1.4 .5After 3 days 9.0 3.0 2.3 .2SemimetallicFormulaAfter 3 hours 3.3 1.2 2.1 .3After 3 days 4.5 2.0 3.4 .4______________________________________ Std. Dev. = Standard Deviation (N1)
Thus, friction ingredients formed into rod-like particles by the above invention demonstrate excellent preform shape retention.
EXAMPLE 7
Improved Break Strength of Preforms Formed from Rod-Like Particles
Preforms for a Ford Escort passenger car disc brake pad (FMSI #D-257) were made from the dry mix sample and from rod-like particles of the semimetallic and non-asbestos organic friction materials described in Example 5.
The 1" thick preforms were made by pressing the materials under 2,500 psi for five seconds in a steel preform mold. The three point breaking strength of the preforms was then measured using a crosshead speed of 0.1 in/min and a span of 21/2". The results from the tests are shown in the following figure:
______________________________________ Material Semimetallic NAO Dry Rod-Like Dry Rod-LikeForm Mix Particles Mix Particles______________________________________Breaking Load 2.9 5.7 1.0 17.7pounds forceStandard 1.3 0.5 1.0 2.2Deviation (N-1)______________________________________
Preforms formed from an equal mixture of the NAO and semimetallic materials demonstrated breaking strengths as shown below.
______________________________________One Part NAO One Part Semimetallic Mixture Dry Rod-LikeForm Mix Particles______________________________________Breaking Load 2.0 12.7pounds forceStandard 1.3 1.6Deviation (N-1)______________________________________
EXAMPLE 8
Improved Rheology of Materials Processed by the Inventions
The formulas described in Example 5 were thoroughly mixed in a Littleford blender and a sample of each dry mix was set aside. The remaining material was processed into rod-like particles according to the invention previously described.
Test cups, similar to a drinking cup configuration, 5" tall, 21/2" diameter at the base and 3" diameter at the lip were molded from cylindrical preforms 17/8" in diameter and 11/2" to 21/2" high formed from the dry mix sample and the rod-like particles of the semimetallic and NAO materials above. In this cup flow test, the minimum pressure needed to completely fill the mold cavity using the rod-like particles is recorded. Preforms made from the conventional dry mix of each material were then molded under identical conditions. The test moldings are then compared between the dry mix and rod-like particle forms of the materials. The results were as follows:
______________________________________ Dry Rod-Like Mix Particles______________________________________NAO FormulaMolding Pressure 500 500psiTime to mold did not close 53closure sec.Final cup height 4.9/4.3 5/5max./ave. inSemimetallicFormulaMolding Pressure 2000 2000psiTime to mold did not close 21closure sec.Final cup height 4.1/3.7 5/5max./ave. in______________________________________
Each composition in the form of rod-like particles produced complete moldings whereas the Littleford dry mixes did not completely fill the mold cavity under identical conditions.
EXAMPLE 9
Improved Flow of Rod-Like Particles
The following raw materials were thoroughly mixed in a Littleford blender.
______________________________________ MaterialIngredient (% Weight) A B______________________________________Powdered Phenolic Novolac Binder 8.4 6.1Resole (PLENCO 12194) 3.0 3.0Nitrile Rubber 1.5 1.5Cashew Particles 1.2 1.3Graphite 13.5 13.5Petroleum Coke 5.2 5.2Barium Sulfate 11.2 11.9Steel Fibers 27.5 28.0Iron Powder 28.0 29.0Zinc Stearate 0.5 0.5______________________________________
A sample of each was set aside and the rest of the material was processed into rod-like particles according to the invention described above.
Circular preforms 1" thick and 17/8" in diameter were made from the dry mix of each formula and from the rod-like particles of each formula. These preforms were compression molded, without preheating, under 2000 psi directly on top of a heated steel disk, 2" in diameter and 0.190" thick. This disc back plate had sixteen 1/4" diameter holes drilled through it. These so called integrally molded (I.M.) holes were equally spaced in a 4 by 4 arrangement. The force required to shear the material from the circular back plate was measured according to the parameters recommended in SAE procedure J840. The results from the molding operation and shear strength testing are shown in the following table.
______________________________________ Material A B rod-like rod-like dry mix particles dry mix particles______________________________________% of back plate <80 100 <10 >90holes filledAverage shear 2303 2496 1005 1772force, lbs. forceStandard 303 318 232 542Deviation (N-1)Shear failure material material pull out materialmode______________________________________
The dry mix and rod-like particles of material A do not significantly differ in terms of shear strength however, the percentage of back plate holes filled is greatly improved by using the rod-like particles. When the resin amount is lowered to 22% volume the improvement in hole fill and shear strength afforded by the invention is dramatic. Previously, improving the flow of friction materials meant increasing the resin amount in the formula or modifying the molding process. This invention now offers a new and novel approach to improving the flow of these resin starved types of materials.
EXAMPLE 10
Demonstration of Free Flowing Nature of Rod-Like Particles
The dry mix samples from the materials described in Example 5 were charged into the stationary hopper apparatus of an automatic, volumetric, hydraulic preform machine. When the machine was operated, no preforms were obtained as the bulky, dusty dry mix constantly bridged and was unable to consistently flow into the preform cavity.
When rod-like particles of the same dimensions as Example 2 and materials of Example 5 were charged into the hopper apparatus, the particles gravity fed into the preform cavity such that the machine produced regular, cylindrical preforms throughout the test run. Preforms of 350 grams were obtained with a variance of less than 10 grams using this volumetric loading procedure.
EXAMPLE 11
Transfer Molding of Dry Littleford Mix
The dry mix of Example 1 before formation into particles is weighed into 150 gram charges and placed in a pressure preformer operating at 1500 psi where it is pressed to form a cylinder approximately 2 inches high by approximately 2" in diameter. Several preforms of this size were made and placed in the transfer cylinder of a standard ASTM D1896 Transfer Mold maintained at 330.degree. F. used on a 100 ton molding press. The press was closed and 2400 psi applied to the transfer cylinder. After 5 minutes the transfer pressure was relaxed and the press opened. There was observed only slight flow into the gates and runner and no suitable parts were produced. When the dry mix is placed into the mold without preheating, nearly identical results obtained. This demonstrates the lack of flow of the dry mix either preformed or as produced.
EXAMPLE 12
Transfer Molding of Rod-Like Particles
Particles of the invention obtained from Example 2 were preheated by tumbling in a hot air stream to about 230.degree. F. in 2 minutes. The particles were easily charged to a transfer mold for flexural strength bars. The mold was heated to 330.degree. F. and a pressure of 2400 psi was applied for 3 minutes. The bars obtained were compared to bars made without preheating. The bars that were made from rod-like particles which had not been preheated did not produce as good appearing flex bars. The unheated rod-like particles did flow enough to fill the cavity; however, there was very little flash on the molded bars as compared to those obtained when the particles were preheated. In addition, some blistering occurred on a few of the bars formed from the non-preheated particles. Moreover, the high quality surfaces realized on the bars made from the preheated particles were not reproduced when the particles were not preheated. A very smooth surface covered all but 1/4" to 1/2" of the flex bar obtained when the particles were preheated. When the particles were not preheated, the smooth surface only covered 1-2" of the 5" bar. The preheating also improved the production rate, appearances and physical properties of the molded part. This example shows the dramatic effect of the rod-like particle formation process on theological flow properties.
EXAMPLE 13
Improved Friction Stability and Fade Resistance of Semimetallic Friction Materials Made by the Invention
The semimetallic formula described in Example 5 was blended in a Littleford mixer, processed into dustless rod-like particles according to the invention described in Example 2.
Disc pads suitable for the front disc brakes for 1990 Ford Escort (FMSI #D-257) prepared according to the invention and were subjected to an inertia dynomometer test procedure. The dynomometer test measures the brake line pressures required to stop a rotating mass according to the schedule shown below:
______________________________________A04D Dynomometer Test Procedure:______________________________________Brake Type: Ford Escort DiscActual Wheel Loadings (lbs.): 1013Rolling Radius (in.): 10.57Actual inertia (slug ft. 2): 24.305______________________________________
______________________________________ Initial Number Braking Rotor of Speed Decel Temp.Cycle Stops (mph) (fpsps) (.degree.F.)______________________________________Instrument 10 30 10 250Check StopsPre-Burnish 4 30 5, 10, 20, 30 250Effectiveness Stops 4 60 5, 10, 20, 30 250Burnish Stops 100 30 10 300 100 40 12 350Post Burnish 4 30 5, 10, 20, 30 250Effectiveness Stops 4 60 5, 10, 20, 30 250Baseline Stops 3 30 10 250Fade Stops 12 60 15 250-700Recovery Stops 5 30 10 --Post Fade/ 4 30 5, 10, 20, 30 250RecoveryEffectiveness Stops 4 60 5, 10, 20, 30 250Pad Inspection -- -- -- --600.degree. F. Wear Stops 75 60 12 600Pad Inspection -- -- -- --800.degree. F. Wear Stops 50 60 12 800Post Wear Tests 4 30 5, 10, 20, 30 250Effectiveness Stops 4 60 5, 10, 20, 30 250______________________________________
The results from the fade and recovery portions of the test on brake pads made in accordance with the invention are shown in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1______________________________________ FadeBaseline Initial RecoveryInitial Line Rotor Line Initial LineStop Rotor Pressure Temp. Pressure Rotor PressureNo. Temp. psi .degree.F. psi Temp. psi.______________________________________1 99 320-428 177 514-648 791 300-4242 132 360-490 296 485-642 521 320-5043 157 360-487 347 484-675 372 218-3774 398 497-683 282 208-3045 449 563-734 229 203-3856 499 608-7707 549 593-7478 597 605-7509 647 577-75310 694 574-761______________________________________
Brake pads molded from the conventional dry mix form of the friction material were similarly tested according to the A04D inertia dynomometer schedule. The results from the fade portion of the test are shown in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2______________________________________ Fade RecoveryBaseline Initial InitialInitial Line Rotor Line Rotor LineStop Rotor Pressure Temp. Pressure Temp. PressureNo. Temp. psi .degree.F. psi .degree.F. psi.______________________________________1 238 285-499 249 332-652 931 471-7392 250 275-499 301 337-579 606 372-4723 250 283-441 350 345-619 495 244-4724 398 383-583 432 185-3535 448 438-651 390 171-3446 499 527-6987 549 634-7198 558 589-7889 595 605-82210 655 581-910______________________________________
From these results it may be concluded that semimetallic friction materials molded from the rod-like particles possess improved frictional stability and fade resistance in comparison to friction materials molded from a dry mix of the same composition.
EXAMPLE 14
Improved Molding of Non-Asbestos Organic Friction Materials Made by the Invention
Cam and Anchor friction elements for class 8 truck air brake systems (FMSI #4515) were prepared in the conventional manner from the following ingredients:
______________________________________ % weightmaterial Ac Bc______________________________________Powdered Phenolic Novolac Binder 17 13Nitrile Rubber & Cure Agents 3 4Rubber Scrap (-20 mesh) 12 5Fiber Glass 8.6 --Mineral Fibers -- 23Graphite 7.3 7Petroleum Coke 4 3Copper Powder -- 12Barium Sulfate 30 26Aluminum Oxide 1.5 1.2Marble White 2.6 --Vermiculite 11 2.8Acrylic Pulp (processing aid) 2.5 2.5Zinc Stearate (mold release) 0.5 0.5______________________________________
The above ingredients were thoroughly mixed in a Littleford blender. Preforms in the near net shape of the final element were formed under 2000 psi for 10 seconds at room temperature. It is necessary to use pulps of organic polymers as processing aids to obtain quality preforms of the dry mix. The preforms were then placed into a mold cavity preheated to 300.degree. F. and molded under 2000 psi for 15 minutes.
To obtain blister free moldings from the dry mix preforms, the press was opened and closed many times during the molding process. In this case, the mold was opened after 1 minute, and closed after 15 seconds. After 30 seconds the mold was reopened for 15 seconds and closed after another 30 seconds. The mold was breathed in this way through 8 minutes of molding to allow enough vapors to escape so a solid, infusible element was ejected from the mold after 15 minutes.
Cam and anchor 4515 friction elements were prepared from identical formulas of Ac and Bc above that had been processed into rod-like particles according to the invention of Example 2. The only difference in the formulas being that a portion of the powdered novolac binder was replaced by PLENCO 12194, and, as no preforming in required, the organic pulp processing aid is omitted from the formula. The rod-like particles of the invention were preheated to about 220.degree. F. with 280.degree. F., 60 cfm air in 4 minutes. The preheated particles were easily charged into the mold cavity and pressure was applied. Due to the uniform preheat, press breathing was not required and solid infusible elements were ejected from the mold in 5 minutes.
EXAMPLE 15
Improved Wear Resistance of Non-asbestos Organic Friction Materials Made by the Invention
Disc brake pads suitable for a Ford F-250 pickup truck (FMSI #D-120) were prepared from a sample of the Littleford dry mix and the rod-like particle form of the NAO formula described in Example 5. The friction materials were tested according to the A04D inertia dynomometer schedule described in Example 13.
Frictional properties between the two material forms proved to be nearly identical. The only noticeable difference in frictional performance between the two material forms came during the 800.degree. F. wear cycle when the brake pads made from rod-like particles demonstrated a 20% higher coefficient of friction than the brake pads made from the composition's dry mix. The friction material's wear resistance was dramatically improved as the following table indicates:
______________________________________Total Brake Pad Wear After A04DDynomometer Test ProcedureNAO Form. Inches Lost Grams Lost______________________________________Dry Mix .171 91.5Rod-Like Particles .134 78.2______________________________________
EXAMPLE 16
Improved Method for the Dispersal of Friction and Wear Controlling Particles
Disc brake pads were molded by combining various proportions of the rod-like particles of the non-asbestos organic and semimetallic materials described in Example 5.
The two different friction materials were combined in the following weight percents:
______________________________________Trial # % NAO % Semimetallic______________________________________1 100 02 70 303 50 504 30 705 0 100______________________________________
Physical property tests on the 0, 50, and 100 percent semimetallic materials gave the following results:
______________________________________ % Semimetallic MaterialPhysical Property 0 50 100______________________________________Specific Gravity 2.89 3.05 3.16Flexural @ 25.degree. C. psi 4580 4445 3987Flexural @ 150.degree. C. psi 2626 2959 3251Modulus @ 25.degree. C. psi 1.2E6 1.1E6 9.3E5Modulus @ 150.degree. C. psi 6.8E5 6.5E5 7.8E5Shear Strength @ 25.degree. C. psi 6823 6125 5073______________________________________
A friction material test machine commonly referred to as a CHASE machine, was used to evaluate the friction and wear properties of these materials. The machine was operated in the constant output or constant friction force mode. The sample was applied for 20 seconds and lifted for 10 seconds for 150 applications at 450.degree. F. with a drum speed of 420 rpm. The samples were required to produce 100 pounds of friction force during the application. The following table lists the results from this test.
______________________________________450.degree. Wear Test % SemimetallicProperty 0 30 50 70 100______________________________________Friction Coefficient .44 .31 .38 .29 .30Thickness loss .021 .006 .013 .007 .006% Thickness Loss 1.20 1.01 1.02 1.14 0.88 % Weight Loss______________________________________
Another CHASE test protocol referred to as the GM R60 test was used to study the high speed, high temperature characteristics of these materials. While the 100 percent non-asbestos organic material faded dramatically during the high speed, high temperature fades of the test, each of the above samples made with semimetallic rod-like particles demonstrated consistent friction levels throughout the test. The wear resistance was also improved with the use of the semimetallic materials.
D-120 brake pads were prepared from the NAO's dry mix, and from rod-like particles formed from the dry mix. Similar brake pads were made from a 70% NAO, 30% semimetallic blend of their dry mixes, and from a 70% NAO, 30% semimetallic blend of the rod-like particles. The brake pads were subjected to the A04D dynomometer test procedure previously described. The results from the high temperature portions of the test are shown in the following table.
__________________________________________________________________________Brake Line Pressure 70% NAO:30% Semimetallic Initial Rotor NAO Temp. Rod-Like Rod-LikeFade Stop No. (Approx.) NAO Dry Mix Particles Dry Mix Particles__________________________________________________________________________ 6 500 545-968 599-1056 723-966 656-946 7 550 598-1063 619-1162 741-1034 659-1024 8 600 605-1170 603-1239 774-1097 793-1081 9 650 695-1248 690-1282 839-1139 774-112310 700 736-1237 697-1228 832-1131 784-113111 750 733-1230 704-1136 817-1115 750-113212 800 815-1231 745-1141 805-1107 830-1139Recovery stop #1 750 379-799 420-725 443-703 428-677Average inches lost .034 .033 .035 .035during Fade cycleAverage inches lost .077 .077 .106 .022during 800.degree. wearcycle__________________________________________________________________________
From these results it may be concluded that the high temperature performance of friction materials may be improved by the use of semimetallic materials in the form of rod-like particles. Improvements may be realized when the semimetallic is added at only 30% by weight.
EXAMPLE 17
Improved Performance Offered by the Invention
The ingredients listed below were charged into a Littleford blender and mixed for 20 minutes.
______________________________________Ingredient % by Weight______________________________________Powdered Phenolic Novolac Binder 14.0Liquid Resole (PLENCO 12194) 2.0Nitrile Rubber 3.0Rubber Cure System 0.1Glass Fiber 13.5Graphite 8.3Petroleum Coke 4.5Ground Scrap Rubber 12.1BaSO4 29.5Kyanite 1.5Calcium Carbonate 2.5Vermiculite 9.0Zinc Stearate 0.5______________________________________
A sample of the dry mix was set aside and the remaining material converted into rod-like particles according to the invention as described in Example 2. D-120 brake pads were molded from the combinations shown in the following table.
______________________________________ Semimetallic fromMaterial No. Above NAO Example 5______________________________________1 100% dry mix 0%2 50% dry mix 50% dry mix3 50% rod-like particles 50% rod-like particles______________________________________
The pads were prepared under identical conditions and subjected to the A04D dynomometer test procedure previously described.
Results from the dynomometer tests are shown in the following table:
______________________________________Initial Brake Line PressureFade Stop Rotor Temp. MaterialNo. (Approx. F.) 1 2 3______________________________________ 6 500 690-898 74-1061 697-1002 7 550 688-974 817-1183 870-1118 8 600 750-1125 880-1320 902-1201 9 650 784-1214 968-1394 897-122810 700 1007-1378 1081-1545 941-121911 750 1053-1549 1045-1634 902-117812 800 1054-1599 1023-1631 960-1136Recovery 750 919-1338 658-1035 551-821Stop No. 1Total Pad 0.123 0.142 0.108ThicknessLoss in______________________________________
From these results it may be concluded that the high temperature performance of NAO friction materials may be improved with the use of rod-like particles of semimetallic friction materials. Simply blending portions of NAO and semimetallic dry mixes does not improve performance as well as blending rod-like particles.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that a number of modifications and changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Number	Name	Date
3434998	Aldrich et al.	Mar 1969
3494884	Kraft	Feb 1970
3917555	Worscheck et al.	Nov 1975
4130537	Bohrer	Dec 1978
4197352	Emmett et al.	Apr 1980
4239666	Jacko et al.	Dec 1980
4268657	Manzara	May 1981
4320823	Covaleski	Mar 1982
4321221	Broutman	Mar 1982
4349595	Trainor et al.	Sep 1982
4352750	Eschen	Oct 1982
4373038	Moraw et al.	Feb 1983
4384054	Moraw et al.	May 1983
4384640	Trainor et al.	May 1983
4465796	Leroy et al.	Aug 1984
4468486	Matsushima et al.	Aug 1984
4548617	Miyatani et al.	Oct 1985
4563386	Schwartz	Jan 1986
4588420	Charvat	May 1986
4654381	Kang et al.	Mar 1987
4657951	Takarada et al.	Apr 1987
5093388	Siemon, Jr. et al.	Mar 1992

Number	Date	Country
0324908A2	Jul 1989	EPX
3231254A1	Feb 1984	DEX
59-47539	Mar 1984	JPX
9074130A	Apr 1984	JPX
59-170174	Sep 1984	JPX
61-162537	Jul 1986	JPX
61-264025	Nov 1986	JPX
61-278586	Dec 1986	JPX
63-289026	Nov 1988	JPX
63-303180	Dec 1988	JPX
64-55441	Mar 1989	JPX
2003088A	Mar 1979	GBX
674781	Jul 1979	SUX

Preparation of friction elements and compositions therefor

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

RELATED CASE

US Referenced Citations (22)

Foreign Referenced Citations (13)

Continuation in Parts (1)