The present invention relates to preparative chromatography columns and method of their use.
Chromatography columns are used in industrial process to purify process liquids and separate the components of interest from process liquids. Prior art chromatography columns comprise a column generally in the form of hollow cylinder, which is packed with a chromatography media and the process liquid passed through the media to cause the binding of the components of the process liquid to the chromatography media. Once the components of the process liquid are loaded onto column, the chromatography media are eluted with solutions of various pH and electrolyte concentrations to obtain a purified form of the components. These processes are tedious, slow, and expensive and cause breakdown of the components during the process of purification.
There is an unmet need to create a chromatography column that will reduce the process time substantially, requires smaller capital investment and offers a sustainable cost of production advantage over a long time.
The present invention offers a column and a method of its use wherein the components are bound to the chromatographic media in a free flow form instead of in a packed column; once bound, the liquid is removed and the bound components eluted in steps to obtain a pure form. Alternately, once the components have become bound, the chromatographic media can be transferred to a traditional column for further purification.
According to the present invention, several problems associated with the use of traditional chromatography columns have been resolved, the cost of manufacturing components from a process liquid reduced and the need for expensive equipment obviated.
The basic principle of chromatography involves a binding or association between a component and the media; these interactions can be ionic, polar, hydrophobic, specific molecular or physical capture. Once a chromatography media has been saturated with the components, it is eluted using buffers of different pH or electrolyte level to break the binding and the eluent collected containing a higher concentration of the components. In many instances, gradient elution is performed where the characteristic of the buffer changes continuously causing a gradual breakdown of the binding of components and thus causing a separation of the components form impurities.
The gradient elution is a form of step elution where the steps are extremely small but it is also a continuous process that does refine the separation profile yet the step elution can be equally effective and all instances much faster than the gradient elution. The free flow binding of the components to chromatographic media as described in the present invention works best with a step elution process. At each step, the chromatography media is allow to come to a complete equilibration with the buffer added and then the entire content of the buffer is removed and replaced with another buffer with different properties. The method can be modified to use as a gradient system but that causes continuous dilution of the components eluted and reduces the purification profile.
Historically the columns used in preparative chromatography are vertical cylindrical tubes packed with chromatography media intended to bind the target molecules and then elute them slowly with a buffer and collecting various fractions of the eluent. The fractions containing the target molecule in its purest form are then pooled to obtain a desired degree of purification.
The methods of preparative chromatography are borrowed from the methods of chromatography used for analytical separation of components such as the use of high pressure to improve the separation efficiency. In preparative chromatography, it is the completeness of binding and the ability to elute is more important. There are many complexities in operating these columns one being a long time needed to load the column with a process liquid containing a target molecule such as a protein. Surprisingly, the fact that the target molecule will bind with the chromatography media in any environment suitable for such binding and it is not necessary to force a process liquid through a column to achieve the binding has been ignored in every current design of columns used in preparative chromatography. The present invention obviates the need for long loading times and additionally introduces methods that allow step elution to purify the target molecules without the need for typical rigid columns and their associated hardware including pumps, pipes, controllers etc.
A first preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in
A second preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in
A third preferred embodiment is shown in
A fourth preferred embodiment is shown in
Whereas the preferred embodiments described in
It is apparent that many modifications and variations of the invention as hereinabove set forth may be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. The specific embodiments described are given by way of example only, and the invention is limited only by the terms of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2087157 | Lind | Jul 1937 | A |
2456524 | Meincke, Jr. | Dec 1948 | A |
4169048 | Albers, Sr. | Sep 1979 | A |
4550594 | Engstrom | Nov 1985 | A |
4668379 | Rosensweig et al. | May 1987 | A |
5167809 | Mann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5368753 | Gardenier, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5423982 | Jungbauer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5547586 | Halperin et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5618105 | Baker | Apr 1997 | A |
5993656 | Cordani | Nov 1999 | A |
6043067 | Lihme et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6214221 | Koft | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6383380 | Kopf | May 2002 | B1 |
6797174 | Neuroth et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7682505 | Vidalinc | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20020094568 | Hei | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040129641 | Paananen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050054839 | Purdum | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050236312 | Gebauer | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060176767 | Hlavinka et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070219524 | Burnouf et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070221557 | Barber et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070295667 | Ruprecht | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080118967 | Korpela et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080314832 | Umezawa et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20110198286 | Niazi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120016113 | Niazi | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1808700 | Jul 2007 | EP |
2011076386 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 17, 2012, for International Application No. PCT/US12/57188. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120018380 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |