PREPARATIVE CRYSTALLIZATION OF RECOMBINANT HUMAN INSULIN

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20220064213
  • Publication Number
    20220064213
  • Date Filed
    January 09, 2020
    5 years ago
  • Date Published
    March 03, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
The present invention discloses a method for crystallizing recombinant Human Insulin at lab and manufacturing scale in the presence of zinc chloride and sodium chloride mixture, higher concentration of organic solvent (IPA—19 to 25 million) and adjusting the pH to 5.0 at a faster rate (≤5 minutes). The method further comprises adopting procedures wherein the settling time is reduced and the holding temperature is altered in order to facilitate consistent protein crystal formation between 15 μm-30 μm and to increase the robustness of the process.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method for peptide crystallization, particularly preparing recombinant human insulin crystal.


BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

Diabetes is a common endocrine and metabolic disorder. It's a long-term condition that causes high blood sugar levels. In type 1 Diabetes, the body does not produce Insulin, also referred to as Insulin-dependent diabetes, juvenile diabetes, or early-onset diabetes. In type 2 Diabetes, the body does not produce enough insulin for proper function, or the cells in the body do not react to Insulin (Insulin resistance). Presently patients with type 1 diabetes are treated with regular insulin injections along with a special diet and exercise. Patients with Type 2 diabetes are treated with tablets, exercise and a special diet, but sometimes insulin injections are also required.


‘Insulin therapy’ has always been considered as an important means for treating diabetes and controlling blood sugar level. Purification of recombinant Human Insulin achieved by multiple downstream unit operations that involve a combination of crystallization, enzyme catalysis and chromatography. The requirement of the highest purity of Human Insulin is to ensure the patients do not develop immunogenic or toxic responses to the drug product.


Recombinant Human Insulin crystallization occurs in two phases. The first phase is nucleation, the appearance of a crystalline phase from either a super cooled liquid or a supersaturated solvent. The second phase is crystal growth, which is the increase in the size of particles and leads to a crystalline state. The crystal form of recombinant Human Insulin is a better form, since it has a uniform and steady solid molecular form and small sediment volume, and is easy to separate from the supernatant, the time for centrifugation and freeze-drying is short, and the production efficiency is relatively high. It is thus desirable to prepare recombinant Human Insulin crystals and then apply the crystals to Insulin pharmaceutical preparations.


Commercial Insulin manufacturing processes typically include a crystallization step to convert soluble purified Insulin into solid form, providing increased stability for bulk storage prior to formulation and filling. Classical Insulin crystallization process as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,910,014 includes preparation of an acidic solution containing organic acid (acetic or citric), approximately 2 g/L Insulin, and zinc and adjustment of the solution pH to near the isoelectric point of insulin (pH 5.5-6.0), which initiated crystal formation.


It is well known in the art that Insulin may be crystallized in the presence of zinc ions, resulting in a crystalline preparation with significant benefits over amorphous, un-crystallized Insulin with regard to stability, storage, formulation, and/or administration. In the presence of zinc, human insulin self-assembles into stable hexameric structures. Zinc content plays an important role in chemical and physical stability of pharmaceutical insulin formulations.


The use of ZnCl2 for crystallization of recombinant Human Insulin (rHI) is an established and well published technique, however, a similar knowledge is not available for crystallizing HI at a preparative scale. Traditional recombinant Human Insulin downstream purification process involves three crystallization steps termed as crystallization-1, crystallization-2 and crystallization-3, respectively as per the order of the operation. Controlling the level of aggregates, residual zinc and other related impurities during drug preparation is a critical quality requirement to make the final drug product complying with the specifications of the innovator. In the recent manufacturing batches of the biosimilar Insulin process, it was noted that level of high molecular weight protein (HMWP) and other related impurities were on the higher level. Crystallization-3 is a potential step, which is a final step of crystallization, where the chances of formation of aggregates (HMWP) and other related impurities are imminent. Improper settling during the neat settling step was observed during this final crystallization stage(s). This suboptimal performance leads to the lower decantation percentage at neat and wash-1 stage resulting in suboptimal freeze-drying performance.


Therefore, there is a need to control the level of these impurities at the appropriate downstream step.


OBJECT OF INVENTION

An object of the present invention is to overcome the various key process challenges observed during the final crystallization & freeze drying stages of recombinant Human Insulin preparation and accordingly modify the process.


Another object of the present invention of preparative peptide crystallization is to obtain consistent crystal geometry and size of recombinant Human Insulin at preparative scale.


SUMMARY OF INVENTION

In one aspect the present invention provides a method for preparing recombinant Human Insulin crystal comprising the steps of:

    • crystallizing the recombinant Human Insulin in a crystallization solution containing recombinant Human Insulin, an organic solvent, a zinc compound, a salt, such that, mixture of the zinc compound and salt was added together to the solution;
    • pH was adjusted to 4.8 to 5.2; and
    • the crystallization solution maintained at ambient temperature-before freeze-drying.


In another aspect the present invention provides a method comprising the steps of:

    • 1) diluting HPLC elution pool by water for irrigation and isopropyl alcohol till solution contains 5 g/L of recombinant human insulin and targeting 21 million ppm of isopropanol; thereto adding mixture of 4% zinc chloride and 0.5M sodium chloride at 0.006 volume per volume per minute under stirring condition at a tip speed of 0.42-0.52 m/s;
    • 2) adjusting the pH to 5.0 using 3M acetic acid within 5 minutes at 0.1 volume per volume per minute under stirring condition at a tip speed of 0.42-0.52 m/s, wherein, post pH adjustment agitation is continued for 15-20 minutes at 0.21 m/s;
    • 3) adjusting the temperature of the above crystallization solution to 23±3° C. upon stopping agitation to allow neat settling for 2.5 to 4.0 hours; then allow the neat settling at 2-8° C. for 10-12 hours;
    • 4) decanting about 85-90% of the supernatant, adding the chilled water to slurry in agitated state at a tip speed of 0.21 m/s for up to 5 minutes, then keeping at 2-8° C. for 16 hours;
    • 5) decanting the supernatant and keeping slurry into the freeze dryer for drying.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 represents flow chart of the process of crystallization of present invention.



FIG. 2 represents flow chart of the process of crystallization followed prior to present invention.



FIG. 3 represents the fishbone diagram of parameters studied in crystallization process of present invention.



FIG. 4 represents the observations on reagent addition strategy 1. The red line indicates the bed height.



FIG. 5A represents the observations on reagent addition strategy 2.



FIG. 5B represents the observations on reagent addition strategy 2.



FIG. 6 represents the observations of impact of IPA content in FFC.



FIG. 7A represents the observations of impact of rate of pH adjustment.



FIG. 7B represents the observations of impact of rate of pH adjustment.



FIG. 8 represents RP-HPLC 3 dynamic binding capacity study flow chart.



FIG. 9 represents the crystal size 15 μm-30 μm and 40× images of recombinant human insulin at various concentrations in FFC upon scale-up.



FIG. 10A represents the recombinant Human Insulin crystals prepared by traditional process wherein only zinc chloride is used.



FIG. 10B represents the recombinant Human Insulin crystals prepared by process of present invention wherein mixture of zinc chloride and sodium chloride is used.



FIG. 10C represents the recombinant Human Insulin-drug substance crystals.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
Definitions

Unless otherwise defined herein; the scientific and technical terms used in connection with the present invention shall have the meanings that are, commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. Further, unless otherwise required by context, singular terms shall include pluralities and plural terms shall include the singular. The methods and techniques of the present invention are generally performed according to conventional methods well known in the art. The nomenclatures used in connection with, and techniques described herein are those commonly used in the art. The methods and techniques of the present invention are generally performed according to conventional methods well known in the art.


The term ‘ambient temperature’ refers to the air temperature of an environment or object or surrounding an equipment. Room Temperature (RT) is generally defined as the ambient air temperature. In present invention, ambient temperatures or room temperature can range between 20 and 26° C.


The term ‘crystallization’ refers to the solid-liquid separation and purification technique in which mass transfer occurs from the liquid solution to a pure solid crystalline phase.


The term ‘Insulin’ refers to a hormone secreted by the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas; regulates storage of glycogen in the liver and accelerates oxidation of sugar in cells.


The term ‘recombinant Human Insulin’ and ‘rHI’ refer to a form of insulin made from recombinant DNA that is identical to human insulin.


The present inventors studied the process deviations for multiple batches at final crystallization and freeze-drying step and found that all deviations were due to the poor neat settling during the final crystallization process (also corroborated by the smaller crystal size i.e. <1 μm). After a thorough root cause analysis (elaborated through the examples below), following factors have been identified to be affecting the crystal size and subsequent settling—

    • IPA content in final FFC (feed for crystallization)
    • Chronology of reagent addition (NaCl first, followed by ZnCl2)
    • Insufficient ambient temperature (24±3° C.) incubation after final pH (5±0.1) adjustment
    • Rate of addition of acetic acid (3M) for pH adjustment


Further, freeze drying failure (improper product drying) was primarily due to the cascading effect of the suboptimal settling in preceding crystallization step. This resulted in higher slurry volume post wash decantation that was almost 12% higher than the expected volume. This led to the loading of each freeze-drying tray with higher bed height and lower slurry percentage (5%). It was found that lower ambient temperature resulted in poor settling while higher hold duration would lead to increase in aggregates (HMWP). It was further observed that at lower slurry percentage higher bed height is detrimental for efficient product drying.



FIG. 1 describes the process of recombinant Insulin crystallization followed in present invention whereas FIG. 2 describes the old process of Insulin crystallization followed prior to the present invention. To mitigate the above mentioned factors affecting crystal size and subsequent settling, the observations made at manufacturing scale wherein process parameters as captured in FIG. 3 were studied.


In order to mitigate the problems of the old process, the present invention provides an improved method for preparing recombinant Human Insulin crystal comprising the steps of crystallizing the recombinant Human Insulin in a crystallization solution containing recombinant Human Insulin, an organic solvent, a zinc compound, a salt, such that, the mixture of zinc compound and the salt are added together in crystallization solution followed by a pH adjustment to 4.8 to 5.2, preferably 5.0.


The present invention, particularly provides an improved crystallization-3 process with FFC targeting 21 million IPA content (ppm).


The concentration of the recombinant human insulin in the crystallization solution is 5.0±0.2 g/L.


In the present invention, the organic solvent is selected from acetonitrile, ethanol, n-propanol and isopropyl alcohol, preferably isopropyl alcohol. The concentration of isopropyl alcohol is from 19 to 25 million ppm, preferably 21 million ppm.


The zinc compound is selected from zinc chloride, zinc oxide, zinc acetate, zinc bromide and zinc sulfate. The salt is selected from sodium chloride, sodium acetate and sodium citrate. Preferably, the solution contains 4% zinc chloride at a concentration of 0.3-0.5 ml per gram of recombinant Human Insulin and 0.5M sodium chloride, which is added as a solution to the crystallization solution.


The pH of the crystallization solution was adjusted in the range of 4.8 to 5.2 using 3M acetic acid within 5 minutes after addition of mixture of zinc chloride and sodium chloride mixture in the crystallization solution.


In a preferred embodiment, the crystallization solution is held at the ambient temperature of 24±3° C. for 2.5 to 4 hours for neat settling, upon which, the chilling of neat settling is achieved at 2-8° C. for 10-12 hours. Further, the slurry is held at 2-8° C. for another 16 hours. The slurry obtained therein is freeze dried.


Elution pool of HPLC was diluted by WFI and IPA followed by addition of solution of ZnCl2+NaCl mixture. The adjustment of 5.0 pH was achieved within 5 minutes of such addition. It was surprisingly found that the faster rate of pH adjustment and the maintenance of ambient/room temperature is vital for protein crystallization, settling and consistent crystal size. The steps of neat settling and complete wash are performed at cold temperature (5±3° C.), which adds to the process robustness and better control of critical quality attributes at final drug substance stage. The 1.1 cm bed height of loading tray used during freeze-drying step for efficient product drying.


In a particular embodiment, the present invention provides a method comprising steps of:

    • a) diluting HPLC elution pool by water for irrigation and isopropyl alcohol till solution contains 5 g/L of recombinant human insulin and targeting 21 million ppm of isopropanol; thereto adding solution mixture of 4% zinc chloride and 0.5M sodium chloride at 0.006 volume per volume per minute under stirring condition at a tip speed of 0.42-0.52 m/s;
    • b) adjusting the pH to 5.0 using 3M acetic acid within 5 minutes at 0.1 volume per volume per minute under stirring condition at a tip speed of 0.42-0.52 m/s, wherein, post pH adjustment agitation is continued for 15-20 minutes at 0.21 m/s;
    • c) adjusting the temperature of the above crystallization solution to 23±3° C. upon stopping agitation to allow neat settling for 2.5 to 4.0 hours; then allow the neat settling at 2-8° C. for 10-12 hours;
    • d) decanting about 85-90% of the supernatant, adding the chilled water to slurry in agitated state at a tip speed of 0.21 m/s for up to 5 minutes, then keeping at 2-8° C. for 16 hours;
    • e) decanting the supernatant and keeping slurry into the freeze dryer for drying.


The present method yields recombinant Human Insulin having a consistent crystal size of about 15 μm-30 μm. It also reduces the time required for sedimentation at manufacturing scale to about 12 hours compared to traditional process wherein the sedimentation step requires 24-60 hours whereas the present invention achieves the same in 12 hours.


Materials and Method

Table 1 elaborates the material and the grade of material used for the altering of crystallization-3 process for crystallizing recombinant human insulin.









TABLE 1







Material and its grade









Sr.




No.
Name
Grade












1.
ACN (Acetonitrile)
CG (Commercial Grade)


2.
CH3COOH (Acetic acid)
MCG (Multi Compendial grade)


3.
MgCl2 (Magnesium Chloride)
SQ (Special Quality)


4.
Glacial Acetic acid
ExcelaR


5.
Tris Buffer
AR (Analytical Reagent)


6.
Sodium Sulphate anhydrous
MCG


7.
L-Arginine
Reagent Grade


8.
ZnCl2 (Zinc Chloride)
MCG


9.
Ortho-phosphoric acid
HPLC Grade




(High Performance Liquid




Chromatography Grade)


10.
Acetonitrile Gradient
HPLC Grade


11.
Acetic acid
HPLC Grade


12.
TFA (Tri-Fluoroacetic Acid)
HPLC Grade


13.
HCl (Hydrochloric Acid)
ACS (American Chemical




Society) reagent


14.
Acetophenone
Reagent Plus


15.
IPA (Isopropyl Alcohol)
CG (Commercial Grade)


16.
NaOH (Sodium Hydroxide)
SQ (Special Quality)


17.
NaCl (Sodium Chloride)
USP (United States




Pharmacopeia) grade


18.
H2SO4 (Sulfuric Acid)
AR


19.
Ultra clean LDPE (Low
Medical grade



Density polyethylene) sheets


20.
Ultra clean Tyvek sheets
Medical grade









Table 2 elaborates the reagents and method of its preparation used for the present invention of altering of crystallization-3 process for crystallizing recombinant human insulin.









TABLE 2







Reagents and its method of preparation









Sr.




No
Reagent Name
Preparation













0.01N HCl
Measure 900 mL of water and then add 0.86 mL of




concentrated HCl (11.65N). Make up the final




volume to 1 L using MilliQ water.


1
1M Acetic acid
Measure 750 mL of water and then add 57.5 ml of




Glacial acetic acid (17.4M). Make up the final




volume to 1 L using purified water, filter through




0.2 micron PES (polyethersulfone) filter.


2
Diluent (for in-process
Measure 949.05 mL of water and then add 0.95 mL



samples): 95% (0.1% TFA
of HPLC grade TFA. Make up the final volume to



water) + 5% HPLC ACN
1 L using HPLC grade Acetonitrile.


3
2M Tris
Dissolve 242.28 g of Tris base in 900 ml purified




water and make up the volume to 1 L using




purified water. Filter through 0.2 PES filter.


4
RP-HPLC 2 Mobile phase A:
For preparation of 1.0 L, add 12.114 g of Tris and



100 mM Tris (Hydroxy methyl
4.066 g of MgCl2 in 800 ml of purified water and



amino methane) buffer +
adjust the pH 8.5 ± 0.05 using acetic acid and make



20 mM Magnesium Chloride at
up the volume to 1 L using purified water, filter



pH 8.50 ± 0.10
through 1.2 PP (Polypropylene) and 0.2 micron




PES (Polyether Sulphone) filter.


5
RP-HPLC 3 Mobile phase A:
For preparation of 1.0 L, add 1.43 mL of acetic acid



25 mM Acetic acid
to 998.56 mL of WFI (Water For Irrigation) and




filter through 1.2 PP and 0.2 micron PES filter.


6
25 mM Sodium hydroxide
Dissolve 1.0 g of Sodium hydroxide pellets in




700 ml of purified water. Make up the volume to




1 L using purified water, filter through 1.2 and 0.2




micron filter.


7
Crystallization-3:
Dissolve 40 g of Zinc chloride (MCG) in 700 ml of



4% Zinc Chloride
WFI water. Adjust the pH to 4.6 ± 0.05 with acetic




acid. Make up the volume to 1 L with WFI and




filter the buffer through 0.2 PES micron filter.


8
Crystallization-3:
Measure 750 mL of water and then add 172.5 ml



3M Acetic acid
of Glacial acetic acid (17.4M). Make up the final




volume to 1 L using WFI water.


9
Crystallization-3:
Dissolve 29.22 g of Sodium chloride in 700 ml of



0.5M NaCl
WFI. Make up the volume to 1 L using WFI, filter




through 0.2 micron filter.









Table 3 elaborates the analytical method(s) used for the altering of crystallization-3 process for crystallizing recombinant human insulin. The table also elaborates the stage of process during which the particular method been used.









TABLE 3







Analytical methods and stage of process where it has been used









Sr.




No.
Analytical method
Stage












1.
Insushort
DSP III (Downstream Process III)




(RP-HPLC to Drug substance)


2.
HMWP
DSP III




(Crystallization-3 to Drug substance)


3.
RS
DSP III



(related substance)
(Drug substance)


5.
LOD
Drug substance



(Loss on drying)


6.
ROI
Drug substance


7.
Zinc
Drug substance


8.
Solvent Analysis
Drug substance









Table 4 elaborates the name and model of the equipment used for the altering of crystallization-3 process for crystallizing recombinant human insulin.









TABLE 4







Equipment details









Sr.




No.
Name
Model/Make












1.
Preparative HPLC
Shimadzu LC-8A & Akta Explorer100


2.
Analytical HPLC
Agilent HPLC- 1200/1100 &




Shimadzu LC-2010


3.
Weighing Balance
Sartorius & Metter Toledo


4.
pH & conductivity
Eutech



meter


5.
Cold room
Blue star


6.
Deep freezer
Vest frost


7.
Magnetic stirrer
Shalom Instruments


8.
Preparative column
Novasep Process LC50.500.VE100


9.
Lyophilizer
Toffion Lyo-0.4(CIP, SIP) &




Telstar Lyobeta


10.
Chiller
Werner Finely Pvt Ltd & Julabo Chiller


11.
Fume hood
Kewaunee Scientific Corporation


12.
Muffle furnace
Servewell instruments Pvt Ltd


13.
Burner
Guna Enterprises


14.
LOD
Servewell instruments Pvt Ltd


15.
Microscope
Olympus CX41









Table 5 elaborates the preparative and analytical columns used for the altering of crystallization-3 process for crystallizing recombinant human insulin.









TABLE 5







List of Preparative and Analytical columns









Sr.




No.
Column Name
Model/Make












1.
HMWP SEC 10 μm,
WATERS HMWP



7.8 × 300 Å


2.
ACE 250*4.6 mm, 5 μm,
Advanced chromatography



300 Å C18
Technologies


3.
Vydac C18, 5 μm,
Grace Vydac



250*4.6 mm


4.
Kromasil 100 Å C8,
Kromasil ®



13 μm, 250*4.6 mm









Table 6 elaborates revised crystallization-3 process parameters and ranges followed in present invention related to the altering of crystallization-3 process for crystallizing recombinant human insulin.









TABLE 6







Revised crystallization process parameter and ranges








Process parameters
Ranges












FFC (feed for crystallization) Concentration
5.0 ± 0.2
g/L


IPA content (ppm*) in FFC
21
million


Molarity of NaCl for FFC volume
40 ± 1
mM


4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl addition rate
≤0.006
vvm


Tip speed during 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl addition
0.42 to 0.52
m/s


Expected consumption of 3.0M acetic acid based on
0.3 to 0.4%
v/v


FFC volume








Volume of 3.0M acetic acid to be added in first pulse
70 to75%



(of the expected consumption)









Rate of pH adjustment (for first pulse)
≥0.1
vvm


Tip speed during pH adjustment
0.42 to 0.52
m/s


Agitation time post pH adjustment
15 to 20
min


Tip speed post pH of 5.0 ± 0.1 attained
0.21
m/s


(15-20 min)


Incubation time at 24 ± 3° C. post pH agitation
2.5 to 4.0
hours


completion


Neat settling temperature post 24 ± 3° C. incubation
5 ± 3°
C.


1st neat supernatant sampling
16
hours


Tip speed during Wash mixing
0.21
m/s


Wash settling temperature
5 ± 3°
C.








Mixing duration during wash (after adding WFI)
Not more than 5 minutes









Wash settling temperature
5 ± 3°
C.


1st wash supernatant sampling
16
hours





*ppm - refers to “μg” of IPA per “g” of Human Insulin in FFC






Parts per million (ppm) calculations used for measuring small concentrations in a solution. In present invention, it was required to prepare an accurate of amount blank buffer (L) for dilution of RP-HPLC3 Elution Pool (EP) (5.0±0.2 g/L) based on the formula elaborated in table 7 below.









TABLE 7





Formulae for IPA content calculations















Dilute the RP-HPLC3 EP to 5.0 g/L with blank buffer










Feed





for





crystallization






(
L
)


=

{


[


Conc
.




of






RPHPLC





3






EP


(

g
L

)


×
Volume





of





total





RPHPLC





3





EP






(
L
)


]



5
.
0



(

g
L

)



}










Blank buffer volume (L) = Volume of Feed for crystallization (L)-Volume of RP-HPLC3 EP (L)


Formula to calculate IPA (ppm) content in RP-HPLC3 EP


X + Y (ppm) = 21000000 (ppm)


Where X is IPA content in ppm (already available in RP-HPLC3 EP), while Y is required


amount of IPA (ppm) to be contributed by blank buffer for dilution of RP-HPLC3 EP.











IPA


(
%
)



in





RPHPLC





3





EP

=



%





B





of





the





first





fraction





of





EP

+

%





B





of





the





last





fraction





of





EP


2










X (ppm) = IPA content in ppm (already available in RP-HPLC3 EP)









X
=

{


[

IPA





in





RPHPLC





3





EP






(
%
)

×
Volume





of





total





RPHPLC





3





EP






(
L
)

×
Density





of






IPA


(

kg
L

)


×
1

0

0

0
×
1

0

0

0

]


Total





product





in





RPHPLC





3






(
kg
)

*
10

0


}










Y (ppm) = 21000000-X (ppm)


Formula to calculate blank buffer IPA strength (%) for RP-HPLC3 EP dilution










Blank





buffer





IPA





strength






(
%
)


=


{


[


Y


(
ppm
)


×
Total





productin





RPHPLC





3





EP






(
kg
)


]


Blank





buffer





vo1ume






(
L
)

×
Densitγ





of





IPA






stock


(

kg
L

)


×
1

0

0

0
×
1

0

0

0


}

×
100










*Density of IPA stock = 0.786 Kg/L


Formula to calculate volume of IPA (L) in blank buffer










Volume





of





IPA






(
L
)


=

{


[

Blank





buffer





IPA






strength


(
%
)


×
Blank





buffer





volume






(
L
)


]

100

}










Formula to calculate volume of WFI (L) in blank buffer


Volume of WFI in Blank buffer (L) = Volume of Blank Buffer (L)-Volume of IPA (L)









The present invention is further elaborated with the help of following examples. However, these examples should not be construed to limit the scope of present invention.


Example 1: The Impact of Reagent Addition Chronology and Temperature of Neat Settling

Haziness was observed in the FFC (feed for crystallization) upon NaCl addition during the satellite trials conducted at the laboratory. NaCl used to hasten the rate of settling during the crystallization process. Thus, based on this attributed purpose of NaCl, experiments were performed to understand whether the change in chronology of NaCl addition would mitigate the haziness observed in the FFC of the batch.


The reagent addition chronology was studied in two strategies viz.


Strategy 1: Addition of 0.5M NaCl post pH adjustment of the crystallization mixture.


Strategy 2: Addition of 4% ZnCl2+0.5M NaCl mixture to the FFC at 5.0 g/L.


The Strategy 1 is Addition of 0.5M NaCl post pH adjustment of the crystallization mixture elaborated as follows in table 8 and 9.


Table 8 elaborates the details of the reagent addition performed in strategy 1. In strategy 1, the RP-HPLC 3 elution pool (EP) of 8.70 g/L concentration was diluted to 5.0 g/L with WFI. This dilution was followed by addition of ZnCl2, which was immediately followed by pH adjustment to 5.0±0.1. NaCl was added to the mixture and it was held at 24±3° C. until neat settling. Table 9 elaborates the details of the observations on reagent addition of strategy 1.


From the trial experiments T5, T6, T20 & T21 (shown in FIG. 4) it was observed that reverse chronology (i.e. addition of NaCl at the very last) did not result in a consistent settling. However, the necessity of ambient hold (24±3° C.) was evident. This observation of ambient hold (subjective to settling observation) was thus maintained constant for all the successive experiments.









TABLE 8







Details of strategy-1 reagent addition









Sr.
Trial



No.
No.
Conditions












1.
T5
RP-HPLC 3 EP 8.70 g/L concentration. diluted to 5.0 g/L with WFI,




the dilution performed to attain 5g/L was inclusive of 40 mM NaCl.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 (0.5 mL/g).




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, 40 mM NaCl was added and the mixture was held at




ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature until settling occurred.


2.
T6
RP-HPLC 3 EP 8.70 g/L concentration. diluted to 5.0 g/L with WFI,




the dilution performed to attain 5 g/L was inclusive of 40 mM NaCl.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 (0.5 mL/g).




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed it mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, 40 mM NaCl was added and the mixture was held at cold




(5 ± 3° C.) temperature until settling occurred.


3.
T20
RP-HPLC 3 EP 11.20 g/L conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with WFI, the




dilution performed to attain 5 g/L was inclusive of 40 mM NaCl.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 (0.5 mL/g).




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed it mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, 40 mM NaCl was added and the mixture was held at cold




(5 ± 3° C.) temperature until settling occurred.


4.
T21
RP-HPLC 3 EP 11.20 g/L conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with WFI, the




dilution performed to attain 5 g/L was inclusive of 40 mM NaCl.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 (0.5 mL/g).




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, 40 mM NaCl was added and the mixture was held at




ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature until settling occurred.
















TABLE 9







observations on reagent addition strategy 1









Observations











Sr.
Trial
Conditions
Settling
Settling bed


No.
No.
(Refer Table 8)
(hr)
appearance














1.
T5
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −8.70 g/L
1.0
Settled bed




Held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature




until settling occurred.


2.
T6
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −8.70 g/L
Not
Not settled




Held at cold (5 ± 3° C.) temperature until
Applicable




settling occurred.


3.
T20
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −11.20 g/L
Not
Not settled




Held at cold (5 ± 3° C.) temperature until
Applicable




settling occurred.


4.
T21
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −11.20 g/L
1.0
Settled bed




Held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature




until settling occurred.









The Strategy 2 is Addition of 4% ZnCl2+0.5M NaCl mixture to the FFC at 5.0 g/L elaborated as follows in table 10 and 11.


Strategy 2 was explored due to the inconsistent results of the strategy 1. Table 10 elaborates the details of the reagent addition performed for strategy 2. In this strategy, experiments were performed by mixing the required amount of 4% ZnCl2 and 0.5M NaCl mixture and in turn added to the prepared FFC at 5.0 g/L. Following which crystallization-3 was performed by adjusting the pH with 3.0M Acetic acid to 5.0±0.1. Table 11 elaborates the details of the observations on reagent addition of strategy 1.


From the trial strategy 2 experiments (shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B), it was observed that the % of IPA in crystallization mixture remains same, but the IPA content (ppm) was varied. This resulted in a varied ambient hold temperature duration required to achieve similar settling across all the experiments. To normalize the IPA content in FFC, next set of trials were performed.









TABLE 10







Details of strategy-2 reagent addition









Sr.
Trial



No.
No.
Conditions












1.
T18
RP-HPLC 3 EP 11.38 g/L conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with RP-HPLC 3




Blank Buffer (16% IPA + 84% 50 mM Acetic acid).




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM) mixture.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature




until settling occurred.


2.
T19
RP-HPLC 3 EP 7.35 g/L conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with WFI.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM) mixture.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1 post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature




until settling occurred.


3.
T20
RP-HPLC 3 EP 11.38 g/L conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with WFI,




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM) mixture.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature




until settling occurred.


4.
T23
RP-HPLC 3 EP 11.38 g/L conc. diluted to 8.0 g/L with RP-HPLC 3




Blank Buffer (16% IPA + 84% 50 mM Acetic acid) and further diluted




to 5.0 g/L with WFI.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM) mixture.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature




until settling occurred


5.
T25
RP-HPLC 3 EP 11.38 g/L conc. diluted to 9.0 g/L with RP-HPLC 3




Blank Buffer (16% IPA + 84% 50 mM Acetic acid) and further diluted




to 5.0 g/L with WFI.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM) mixture.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature




until settling occurred.


6.
T26
RP-HPLC 3 EP 11.38 g/L conc. diluted to 10.0 g/L with RP-HPLC 3




Blank Buffer (16% IPA + 84% 50 mM Acetic acid) and further diluted




to 5.0 g/L with WFI.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of required




amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM) mixture.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.) temperature




until settling occurred.
















TABLE 11







Observations on reagent addition strategy 2









Observations

















IPA


Sr.
Trial
Conditions
Settling
Crystal
content


No.
No.
(Refer Table 10)
(h)
size (μm)
(ppm)















1.
T18
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −11.38 g/L
1.0
>20
26409600




EP diluted to 5.0 g/Lwith RP-




HPLC 3 Blank Buffer (16%




IPA + 84% 50 mM Acetic acid).


2.
T19
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −7.35 g/L
1.5
 >15+
17965714




EP diluted to 5.0 g/Lwith WFI.


3.
T20
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −11.38 g/L
9.0
>50
11603515




EP diluted to 5.0 g/Lwith WFI.


4.
T23
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −11.38 g/L
2.0
>20
16506000




EP diluted to 8.0 g/Lwith RP-




HPLC 3 Blank Buffer (16%




IPA + 84% 50 mM Acetic acid)




and further diluted to 5.0 g/L




with WFI.


5.
T25
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −11.38 g/L.
3.0
>20
14672000




EP diluted to 9.0 g/Lwith RP-




HPLC 3 Blank Buffer (16%




IPA + 84% 50 mM Acetic acid)




and further diluted to 5.0 g/L




with WFI.


6.
T26
RP-HPLC 3 EP conc −11.38 g/L
2.5
Precipitate
13204800




EP diluted to 10.0 g/Lwith RP-




HPLC 3 Blank Buffer (16%




IPA + 84% 50 mM Acetic acid)




and further diluted to 5.0 g/L




with WFI.









Example 2: Impact and the Role of IPA Content in FFC

Based on the observations in reagent addition chronology experiments and the observed variation in IPA content (ppm) in FFC; trials were performed by normalizing the IPA content (ppm) in FFC to hasten the settling rate during neat settling.


Table 12 elaborates the RP-HPLC3 EP dilution by targeting IPA content (ppm) in FFC whereas table 13 and FIG. 6 elaborate the observations of the impact of IPA content in FFC.


The IPA content (ppm) in FFC is vital for achieving desired settling and crystal size. However, the repetition of IPA content target experiments did not result in the similar crystal size. This observation led to study the rate of pH adjustment as one of the key factor that might influence crystal size.









TABLE 12







RP-HPLC3 EP dilution by targeting IPA content (ppm) in FFC









Sr.
Trial



No
No.
Conditions












1
T53
RP-HPLC 3 EP 6.58 g/L conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with Blank




buffer (2% IPA + 98% WFI) targeting 20 million IPA content




(ppm) in FFC,




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of




required amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM)




mixture.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix




for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.)




temperature until settling occurred.


2
002(16)A
RP-HPLC 3 EP 13.13 g/L conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with WFI,




(IPA content is not targeted in FFC).




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of




required amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM)




mixture.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix




for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.)




temperature until settling occurred.


3
002(16)B
Small portion of 002(16) A crystallization mixture was




separated and stimulated with 100% IPA targeting 21




million.




Post IPA stimulation, the mixture was held at ambient




temperature for settling


4
002(02)
RP-HPLC 3 EP 7.27 g/L conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with Blank




buffer (6.5% IPA + 93.5% WFI) targeting 21 million IPA




content (ppm) in FFC,




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of




required amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM)




mixture.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1, post attaining the pH, the solution was allowed to mix




for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.)




temperature until settling occurred.
















TABLE 13







Observation of the impact of IPA content in FFC









Observations
















Settling



Sl.
Trial
Conditions
Settling
bed
Crystal


no
No
(Refer Table 12)
(h)
appearance
size (μm)















1.
T53
RP-HPLC 3 EP 6.58 g/L
1
Settled bed
>20




conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with




Blank buffer (2% IPA +




98% WFI) targeting 20




million IPA content (ppm)




in FFC.


2.
002(16)A
RP-HPLC 3 EP 13.13 g/L
3
Not settled
Nucleation




conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with


started




WFI, (IPA content is not




targeted in FFC).


3.
002(16)B
Small portion of 002(16) A
3
Settled bed
>20




crystallization mixture was




aliquoted and stimulated




with 100% IPA targeting 21




million.


4.
002(02)
RP-HPLC 3 EP 7.27 g/L
3
Settled bed
 5




conc. diluted to 5.0 g/L with




Blank buffer (6.5% IPA +




93.5% WFI) targeting 21




million IPA content (ppm)




in FFC.









Example 3: The Impact of Rate of pH Adjustment

Based on the varying crystal sizes (μm) observed despite appropriate addition of reagents (NaCl+ZnCl2) (discussed in example 1) and targeting IPA (ppm) in FFC (discussed in example 2), experiments elaborated in table 14 were performed to understand the impact of rate of pH adjustment.


The IPA content targeted to 21 million in FFC. The addition of 3M acetic acid for attaining the crystallization pH to 5.0±0.1 has to be 0.1 vvm irrespective of the scale of crystallization (refer Table 15).









TABLE 14







Details for rate of pH adjustment









Sl.
Trial



no
No
Conditions












1.
002(09)
RP-HPLC 3 EP 7.34 g/L conc. at pH 7.30 diluted to 5.0 g/L with




Blank buffer (6.2% IPA + 83.8% WFI) targeting 21 million IPA




content (ppm) in FFC.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of




required amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM)




mixture at 0.015 vvm of FFC.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1 at 0.001 vvm and post attaining the pH, the solution was




allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.)




temperature until settling occurred.


2.
002(10)
RP-HPLC 3 EP at pH 7.30 was further adjusted to pH 7.50 with




2M TRIS.




RP-HPLC 3 EP 7.34 g/L conc. at pH 7.50 diluted to 5.0 g/L with




Blank buffer (6.2% IPA + 83.8% WFI) targeting 21 million IPA




content (ppm) in FFC.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of




required amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM)




mixture at 0.015 vvm of FFC.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1 at 0.001 vvm and post attaining the pH, the solution was




allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.)




temperature until settling occurred.


3.
002(11)
RP-HPLC 3 EP at pH 7.30 was further adjusted to pH 7.50 with




2M TRIS.




RP-HPLC 3 EP 7.34 g/L conc. at pH 7.50 diluted to 5.0 g/L with




Blank buffer (6.2% IPA + 83.8% WFI) targeting IPA content 21




million in FFC,




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of




required amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM)




mixture at 0.015 vvm of FFC.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1 by bolus addition and post attaining the pH, the solution




was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.)




temperature until settling occurred.


4.
002(13)
RP-HPLC 3 EP 7.34 g/L conc. at pH 7.30 diluted to 5.0 g/L with




Blank buffer (6.2% IPA + 83.8% WFI) targeting 21 million IPA




content (ppm) in FFC.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of




required amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM)




mixture by bolus addition.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1 by bolus addition and post attaining the pH, the solution




was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.)




temperature until settling occurred.


5.
002(14)
RP-HPLC 3 EP at pH 7.30 was further adjusted to pH 7.50 with




2M TRIS.




RP-HPLC 3 EP 7.34 g/L conc. at pH 7.50 diluted to 5.0 g/L with




Blank buffer (6.2% IPA + 83.8% WFI) targeting 21 million IPA




content (ppm) in FFC.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of




required amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM)




mixture by bolus addition and post attaining the pH, the solution




was allowed to mix for 5 min.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1 by bolus addition and post attaining the pH. the solution




was allowed to mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.)




temperature until settling occurred.


6.
002(15)
RP-HPLC 3 EP at pH 7.30 was further adjusted to pH 7.50 with




2M TRIS.




RP-HPLC 3 EP 7.34 g/L conc. at pH 7.50 diluted to 5.0 g/L with




Blank buffer (6.2% IPA + 83.8% WFI) targeting 21 million IPA




content (ppm) in FFC.




Post dilution, crystallization-3 was performed by addition of




required amount of 4% ZnCl2 + 0.5M NaCl (0.5 mL/g + 40 mM)




mixture at 0.015 vvm of FFC.




pH of the resultant solution was adjusted with 3.0M acetic acid to




5.0 ± 0.1 by bolus addition and post attaining the pH, the solution




was allowed it mix for 5 min.




Post mixing, the mixture was held at ambient (24 ± 3° C.)




temperature until settling occurred.
















TABLE 15







Matrix of pH adjustment data and observation










Reagent & Rate of




Addition
Observations

















3M Acetic

Crystal


Sr.
Trial
Conditions
ZnCl2 + NaCl
acid for pH
Settling
size


no
No
(Refer Table 14)
mixture
adjustment
(hr)
(μm)
















1.
002(09)
RP-HPLC3 EP
Slow (0.015
Slow (0.001
1
Micro




pH 7.30
vvm)
vvm)

crystal


2.
002(10)
RP-HPLC3 EP
Slow (0.015
Slow (0.001
1
10




pH 7.50
vvm)
vvm)


3.
002(11)
RP-HPLC3 EP
Slow (0.015
Bolus
1
>20




pH 7.50
vvm)


4.
002(13)
RP-HPLC3 EP
Bolus
Bolus
3
>20




pH 7.30


5.
002(14)
RP-HPLC3 EP
Bolus
Bolus
1
>20




pH 7.50


6.
002(15)
RP-HPLC3 EP
Slow (0.015
Bolus
1
>20




pH 7.50
vvm)









Example 4: The Impact of RP-HPLC3 Product Binding Capacity on Crystallization

To challenge the RP-HPLC3 product binding capacity as well as to understand the impact of RP-HPLC 3 product dynamic binding capacity (DBC) at final crystallization stage, RP-HPLC3 trials were performed at two different DBCs, one at 23 g/L and another one at 50 g/L to accommodate and propose the wider range of DBC at manufacturing scale unlike the current control limit for RP-HPLC 3 DBC (25 to 40.0 g/L). FIG. 8 shows the RP-HPLC 3 DBC study flow chart.


RP-HPLC 2 load was procured from the manufacturing facility and RP-HPLC 2 and RP-HPLC 3 steps were performed at pilot lab as per insulin biosimilar process. All the individual fractions (after RPHPLC3) were adjusted to 7.35±0.1 after the elution. After pooling the fractions, pH of RPHPLC3 bulk EP was checked and adjusted to 7.4±0.1. Individual fractions pH essentially were not less than 7.3, as it may trigger protein precipitation.


Table 16 elaborate the RP-HPLC3 Load purity profile wherein table 17 elaborate RP-HPLC3 process performance and quality attributes at different DBC.


Quality attributes of RP-HPLC3 EP, which was generated at different DBC were comparable with control specifications. The same RP-HPLC 3 EP was utilized for crystallization-3 experiments, found no impact on crystallization process.


RP-HPLC3 EP was used for scale up trial.









TABLE 16







RP-HPLC3 Load purity profile














Conc.
Purity
0.85-0.86
0.92-0.93
0.95-0.96
1.03-1.04


Sample
(g/L)
(%)
RRT
RRT
RRT
RRT





Load
Not more
Not more
Not more
Not more
Not more
Not more


spec.
than
than
than
than
than
than



5.0 g/L
98.6%
0.18%
0.10%
0.35%
0.25%


Load
4.20
98.28
0.17
0.07
1.06*
0.13





*0.95 + 0.96 RRT was out of specification for RP-HPLC 3 Load.













TABLE 17







RP HPLC3 process performance and quality attributes at different DBC




















0.95-
1.03-

























0.96
1.04










0.85-
RRT
RRT









Purity
0.86
Not
Not







Sample

(%)
RRT
more
more


EP




EP
Loading
NLT
BLOQ
than
than
Conc.
Yield
in
% B
% B


spec.
(g/L)
99.50%
(0.05%)
0.10%
0.10%
(g/L)
(%)
CVs
start
End




















001(04)
50.05
99.75
0.00
0.10*
0.07
12.87
81.62
3.17
15.5
17.4


EP












002(01)
23.35
99.85
0.00
0.00
0.09
7.27
80.01
2.57
15.7
17.2


EP












002(03)
23.35
99.82
0.00
0.05
0.09
7.49
76.79
2.39
15.4
16.8


EP












002(12)
50.42
99.74
0.00
0.10*
0.07
13.15
84.26
3.23
15.8
17.4


EP





*Higher level of 0.95/0.96 RRT was observed due to the higher level of the same at RP-HPLC3 Load stage, though the values are within the specification.






Example 5: Scale-Up Trial

From the various earlier trials (referred in example 1-4), it was observed that the reagent addition chronology, IPA content (ppm), pH adjustment rate and ambient hold temperature are vital for crystallization-3 process.


Based on the understanding, gained from various experiments, scale up trials were designed while keeping following process parameters under check (Table 18). Table 19 elaborates the scale up performance with respect to process & quality wherein FIG. 9 shows the images of crystals obtained upon scale-up.









TABLE 18







Process parameters that were under check during scale-up of crystallization-3










Process parameters
Trial 1
Trial2
Trial














RP-HPLC 3 DBC (g/L)
50 g/L
25 g/L
50
g/L








FFC conc. (g/L)
5.0 ± 0.2


Target IPA content (ppm) at FFC stage
21


Addition of 0.5M NaCl + % ZnCl2 mixture
40 mM NaCl + 0.5 mL/g ZnCl2 @ ≤0.006 vvm


Mode of pH adjustment (5.0 ± 0.1)
Bolus (≥0.1 vvm)


Agitation time after pH adjustment (min)
15 to 20


Ambient temperature hold during neat
3.0 to 4.0


settling (h)


% neat decantation
  85-90%










Fold wash after neat decantation
8 fold
10
fold








% Wash decantation
≥95-97%
















TABLE 19







Table 19: Scale up performance - process & quality











Stage
Attributes
T003
T004
T006














FFC
Conc. (g/L)
4.96
5.01
5.14


FFC
pH
7.36
7.60
7.35


(before pH
Conductivity
0.39
0.80
0.34


adjustment)
(mS/cm)


FFC
pH
4.83
5.01
5.02


(After pH
Conductivity
3.39
3.67
3.26


adjustment)
(mS/cm)


Neat
Ambient
3.0
3.0
2


Settling
hold (h)



Temperature
5 ± 3° C.
5 ± 3° C.
5 ± 3° C.



Time
3.5 h
4.0 h
15.5 h



%
87.70
89.02
85.02



Decantation


Neat
Sup conc.
0.23
0.07
0.10


Decanted
(mg/ mL)


supernatant
pH
4.86
5.06
5.03



Conductivity
3.45
3.56
2.99



(mS/cm)


Wash
Temp.
5 ± 3° C.
5 ± 3° C.
5 ± 3° C.


settling


temperature


Wash
pH
4.83
5.02
5.01


Decanted
Conductivity
0.58
0.50
0.39


supernatant
(mS/cm)



%
94.86
95.51
96.97



Decantation



Sup conc.
0.05
0.03
0.10



(mg/mL)


Neat Slurry
Insushort
99.77
99.80
99.74



purity (%)



HMWP (%)
0.072
0.048
0.040


FFL
Insushort
Not Available
99.76
Not Available


Feed for
purity (%)


Lyophilisation
HMWP (%)
Not Available
Not Available
0.045









Example 6: The Sub-Optimal Freeze-Drying During Insulin Biosimilar Batch

Due to the poor settling at neat settling stage during the Crystallization 3 stage of Insulin biosimilar process, lower decantation was performed at each stage (neat and wash). As per the general trend (data obtained upon following old process mentioned in FIG. 2), volume for freeze-drying is observed to be in the range of 30±2 Litres but it was found to be 34.46 Litres in this batch. As per the BMR limit, maximum volume, which could be loaded on each tray, should be 1.28 Litre (which corresponds to the 1.1 cm bed height) but due to the higher volume after wash decantation, average volumetric distribution of slurry in each tray was 1.436 Litre, which corresponds to the 1.23 cm bed height). In addition, the observed slurry percentage, which was loaded in each tray, was approximately 5%.


To understand the impact of Slurry percentage and bed height on Freeze-drying efficiency, the following trial elaborated in table 20 was designed. Manufacturing slurry (re-dissolved slurry) was procured to understand the impact of bed height & slurry percentage on freeze drying efficiency (Table 21).


From the results, it was quite evident that, at lower slurry percentage (4-5%), increase in bed height can impact on the moisture content (LOD value). Higher the bed height (with lower slurry percentage) in freeze drying tray would result in inefficient drying and sublimation.









TABLE 20







Freeze-drying trial













Total challenge to the



Slurry %
Bed height (cm)
condenser







8%
1.2 cm
20% of total capacity




1.4 cm



4%
1.2 cm




1.4 cm




1.6 cm

















TABLE 21







Freeze drying process outcome









Slurry %
Bed height (cm)
LOD value





8%
1.2 cm
4.45%



1.4 cm
Didn't dry


4%
1.2 cm
8.04%



1.4 cm
Did not dry



1.6 cm
Did not dry









Summary of Final Drug Substance Quality Attributes (3 Scale Up Experiments)

For a particular crystallization condition (as captured in the ‘condition’ section of each table), observations are captured pertaining to each unique experiment. Table 22 elaborates the summary of final drug substance from revised crystallization process whereas table 23 elaborates the list of critical process parameter and its impact observed during the trails conducted (referred in example 1-6).









TABLE 22







Summary of Final drug substance from revised crystallization process














T003
T004
T006
USP monograph


Stage
Parameter
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Specification















DS
ORP % (RS)
0.08
0.07
0.11
Not more than







2.0%



A21% (RS)
0.04
0.04
0.039
Not more than







2.0%



HMWP % value
0.13
0.12
0.1
Not more than







1.0%



Insushort purity
99.54
99.71
99.52
Not Applicable



(%)



IPA (ppm)
791.0
1037.53
1432
Not more than







5000 ppm



LOD (%)
1.99
2.68
2.56
Not more than







10.0%



ROI (%)
1.05
1.11
Not Available
Not Applicable



Zn (%)
0.38
0.40
0.39
Not more than







1.00%
















TABLE 23







List of critical process parameter and its impact













Impact of the


Stage
Parameter
Targeted range
parameter














Crystallization
IPA content (ppm) ppm
21
million
Lower IPA would



at FFC stage


result in inefficient






settling of crystals









while higher IPA can



pose the challenges for



its removal in DS












pH adjustment rate first
0.1
vvm
vvm directly



pulse (target pH


(positive correlation)



5.0 ± 0.1)


impacts crystal size











Mixing rate & time
0.21 m/s mixing
Mixing rate and time



after final pH
rate & 20 min
are crucial to aid



adjustment pH 5.0 ± 0.1
Mixing time
crystallization












Ambient Temperature
2.5-4
hours
Lower ambient hold



hold duration during


would result in poor



neat settling


settling while higher






hold duration would






lead to increase in






aggregates (HMWP)










Freeze drying
Bed height
Not more than
Higher bed height




1.1 cm
could result in





inefficient sublimation





and there by drying.









CONCLUSION

Based on the above data, it's evident that performing crystallization-3 process with FFC targeting 21 million IPA content (ppm), followed by addition of ZnCl2+NaCl mixture, & comparatively faster rate of pH adjustment and ambient temperature hold are vital for protein crystallization, settling and consistent crystal size. Performing remaining neat settling and complete wash, both at cold temperature (5±3° C.) can certainly add up to the process robustness and better control of critical quality attributes at final drug substance stage.


The process thus reduced time for sedimentation at manufacturing scale. In traditional process, the sedimentation used to take up to 24-60 hours whereas the present invention achieves the same result in 12 hours. The results arc shown in Figure 10 which contains three comparative images of human insulin crystals 10A represent the recombinant Human Insulin crystals prepared by traditional process wherein only zinc chloride is used while 10B represents the recombinant Human Insulin crystals preparec by process of present invention wherein mixture of zinc chloride and sodium chloride is used. The consistent crystal size between 15 μ-30 μm is noticeable in 10B. 10C represents the recombinant Human Insulin drug substance crystals.

Claims
  • 1. A method for preparing recombinant Human Insulin crystal comprising the steps of: a. crystallizing the recombinant Human Insulin in a solution containing a recombinant Human Insulin, an organic solvent, and a mixture of Zinc chloride and salt;b. adjusting the pH of crystallization solution in the range of 4.8 to 5.2;c. neat settling of crystallization solution at room temperature followed by neat settling at chilling temperature; andd. freeze drying of slurry and obtaining recombinant Human Insulin crystal.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the concentration of the recombinant Human Insulin in the crystallization solution is 5.0±0.2 g/L.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the organic solvent is selected from acetonitrile, ethanol, n-propanol and isopropyl alcohol.
  • 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the preferable organic solvent is isopropyl alcohol.
  • 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein concentration of isopropyl alcohol is 19-25 million ppm, preferably 21 million ppm.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the concentration of the zinc chloride is 0.3-0.5 ml per gram of recombinant human insulin.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the salt is selected from sodium chloride, sodium acetate and sodium citrate.
  • 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the salt is preferably sodium chloride.
  • 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the concentration of sodium chloride in the crystallization solution is 0.5M.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the pH of the crystallization solution is adjusted to 5.0 using 3M acetic acid.
  • 11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the pH is adjusted within 5 minutes following addition of mixture of zinc chloride and sodium chloride in the crystallization solution.
  • 12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the crystallization solution is allowed to settle during neat settling for 2.5 to 4 hours at temperature between 21° C. to 27° C.
  • 13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the crystallization solution is further allowed to settle for 10 to 12 hours at temperature between 2° C. to 8° C.
  • 14. The method according to claim 1, wherein a bed height of freeze-drying tray is 1.1 cm.
  • 15. A method for preparing recombinant Human Insulin crystal, comprising the steps of: 1) preparing a crystallization solution containing 5.0 g/L of recombinant human insulin, 21 million ppm of isopropyl alcohol, 4% zinc chloride, 0.5M of sodium chloride;2) adjusting pH value of the crystallization solution to 5.0 using acetic acid;3) holding the solution at temperature 24±3° C. for 2.5 to 4 hours for neat settling;4) cooling the crystallization solution to a temperature of 2-8° C. for 10-16 hours; and5) freeze drying and thereby obtaining the recombinant human insulin crystal.
  • 16. The method according to claim 1, comprising the steps of: 1) diluting HPLC elution pool by water for irrigation and isopropyl alcohol till solution contains 5 g/L of recombinant human insulin and targeting 21 million ppm of isopropanol; thereto adding mixture of 4% zinc chloride and 0.5M sodium chloride at 0.006 volume per volume per minute under stirring condition at a tip speed of 0.42-0.52 m/s;2) adjusting the pH to 5.0 using 3M acetic acid within 5 minutes at 0.1 volume per volume per minute under stirring condition at a tip speed of 0.42-0.52 m/s, wherein, post pH adjustment agitation is continued for 15-20 minutes at 0.21 m/s;3) adjusting the temperature of the above crystallization solution to 23±3° C. upon stopping agitation to allow neat settling for 2.5 to 4.0 hours; then allow the neat settling at 2-8° C. for 10-12 hours;4) decanting 85-90% of the supernatant, adding the chilled water to slurry in agitated state at a tip speed of 0.21 m/s for up to 5 minutes, then keeping at 2-8° C. for 16 hours; and5) decanting the supernatant and keeping slurry into the freeze dryer for drying.
  • 17. The method according to claim 1, wherein consistent crystal geometry and size of recombinant Human Insulin is obtained between 15 μm-30 μm.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
201941001190 Jan 2019 IN national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/IB2020/050135 1/9/2020 WO 00