Presentation control for flat article singulation mechanism and sensors suitable for use therewith

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6585256
  • Patent Number
    6,585,256
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 12, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 1, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
An apparatus and method are provided for controlling the presentation of articles to the singulation head of a system for singulating a stack of edge-mounted articles, for example mixed mail, which mechanism senses the instantaneous pressure at which the lead article of the stack is pressed against the singulation head. A feedback control may be provided responsive to a difference between detected instantaneous pressure and a desired target pressure for controlling at least one drive member in a manner so as to reduce such difference. Where there is a pick window of instantaneous pressure at which singulation can be effectively performed, a control may also be provided to inhibit operation of the singulation head when the instantaneous pressure is outside the pick window. Two vertically spaced pressure sensors may be provided on the singulation head to detect the angle at which the lead article is presented to the head and controls may be provided for the drive mechanism(s) to reduce the difference between the instantaneous angle detected and an optimum angle for singulation and/or to inhibit operation of the singulation head when the instantaneous angle is outside of a range where singulation may be effectively performed.The sensor preferably includes a lever extending from the surface of the singulation head which is moved by a distance dependant on the pressure applied thereto. A servo motor may be connected to the lever to apply a bias pressure thereto which bias pressure is determined by a control signal applied to the motor. The sensor may also include a position encoder generating an output indicative of lever position.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to flat article singulation mechanisms and to sensors suitable for use therewith. More particularly, this invention relates to a mechanism for controlling the presentation of articles to a singulation head of a flat article singulation system and to sensors suitable for use in such a mechanism, which sensors detect the pressure at which an article is pressed against a surface with high precision and with easy range adjustability.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




There are many applications, including the processing of mixed mail, where a need exists to singulate a single flat article from a stack of such articles at relatively high speed and with wide variations in the size, thickness and weight of the articles being singulated, while still maintaining high controllability on the outputted articles, a low jam rate, low damage rate, and substantial elimination of doubles passing through the singulation mechanism. While many mechanisms exist for reducing the incidence of doubles passing from a singulation head to a takeaway mechanism, no such mechanism can be completely affective in catching and eliminating all doubles which occur, a doubles being defined as an article which sticks to an article being singulated and passes to the takeaway mechanism with such article. It is therefore desirable to design the singulation mechanism so as to minimize the incidence of doubles, and thus the number of doubles which must subsequently be resolved. However, while it has been generally understood that the occurrence of doubles can be reduced by controlling the presentation of the articles to the singulation head, there has been little understanding of exactly how to control such presentation so as to minimize doubles. Further, in order to control presentation of flat articles to the surface of the singulation head, it is necessary to accurately sense the pressure at which articles are being pressed against the head, preferably over a fairly wide pressure range. Suitable pressure sensors for such application have not heretofore existed.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the above, it has been found that two factors in the presentation of flat articles, such as mixed mail, to a singulation head influence the incidence of doubles, these factors being the pressure at which the stack of articles is pressed against the head and the angle of the stack relative to the head. In particular, for a given singulation mechanism operating under selected specifications as to size, thickness and weight of the flat articles to be singulated, there will be a particular target pressure which is optimum for singulation without the incidence of doubles, and there will be a pick window of pressures around such target pressure at which singulation can be successfully performed. The further the instantaneous pressure of the lead article in the stack, the article to be singulated, against the singulation head deviates from the target pressure, the more likely it is that doubles will occur. When the pressure is outside of the pick window, successful singulation can no longer be assured. Similarly, there is an optimum angle of presentation for the articles in order to achieve doubles free singulation, and there is a range of angles of presentation for articles beyond which successful singulation can not be assured. A successful singulation mechanism should therefore be designed so as to only be operable when the pressure at which articles are being pressed against the singulation head is within the pick window and when the angle of presentation is within a range at which successful singulation can be achieved. The singulation mechanism should also be designed to maintain the presentation pressure for the articles being singulated as close to the optimum target pressure as possible and to maintain the angle of presentation as close to a desired target angle as possible.




The invention thus provides a mechanism for controlling the presentation of articles to the singulation head of a system for singulating a stack of edge-mounted articles, which mechanism includes at least one servo-controlled drive member for moving the stack of articles toward the head, with a leading article of the stack, which article is to be singulated, contacting the head at an instantaneous pressure; a sensor mounted in the head for detecting such instantaneous pressure; and a feedback control operative in response to the difference between the detected instantaneous pressure and a target pressure for controlling the drive member so as to reduce such difference. For a preferred embodiment, such sensor is mounted in a lower portion of the head, and a second pressure sensor is also provided which is mounted in an upper portion of the head, the feedback control operating on the drive member in response to instantaneous outputs from at least the second pressure sensor, and generally from both pressure sensors, to control orientation of the stack of articles relative to the front face of the head. For a singulation head having a drive belt which picks off the leading article, the sensor and second sensor may be below and above the belt, respectively.




A second component may be provided for applying a controlled bias pressure to at least one of the sensors, such component being a servo motor for preferred embodiments, the bias pressure applied by the servo motor being determined by a control signal applied thereto. A separate servo motor is preferably provided for controlling bias pressure for each sensor. A separate position encoder may also be provided for each sensor, the position encoder preferably being a precision encoder which detects movement of a lever which moves in response to pressure applied thereto in the 10


−3


range.




For a preferred embodiment, there are two servo-controlled drive members, a servo-driven belt on which an edge of each article rides and a servo-driven pusher on a back of the stack. The belt may for example respond primarily to an output from the sensor to control stack pressure against the head and may also be used to control orientation; the pusher may respond to both sensors to control orientation of the stack relative to the face of the head and to also control pressure. For some embodiments, the feedback control is operative to control the drive member at a rate which is related to the difference between instantaneous pressure and target pressure. For preferred embodiments, there is also a pick window of instantaneous pressures at which singulation can effectively be performed by the head, and a control is provided which inhibits operation of the head when the instantaneous pressure sensed by the sensor, or at least by the lower sensor where two sensors are employed, is outside of such pick window. The control inhibiting operation of the singulation head may also be operative where the angle of presentation is detected as being outside of an acceptable range.




The invention also includes a sensor for detecting the pressure at which an article is pressed against a surface, which sensor includes a lever extending from such surface, the lever being moved a selected distance in a selected direction in response to an article being pressed against the surface at pressures within a selected range, and a servo motor connected to the lever to apply a bias pressure thereto in a direction opposite the direction of lever movement under pressure from the article, the bias pressure being determined by a control signal applied to the motor. The sensor also includes, for preferred embodiments, a position encoder generating an output indicative of lever position in the selected direction. The position encoder is preferably a precision encoder capable of detecting movements of the lever in the 10


−3


inch range.




Finally, the invention includes a method for controlling the presentation of articles to the singulation head of a system for singulating a stack of edge-mounted articles, the method including using a sensor mounted in the head to detect the instantaneous pressure at which a leading article in the stack, which article is to be singulated, is pressed against the head; determining the difference between each instantaneous pressure and a target pressure; and utilizing such difference to control at least one drive mechanism moving a stack of articles substantially perpendicular to a singulation face of the head in a manner so as to reduce such difference. There is preferably a pick window for the instantaneous pressure, the method including inhibiting operation of the singulation head during any period when the instantaneous pressure detected is outside of such pick window. A similar inhibiting operation may occur when the presentation angle of articles is outside of an acceptable range. For a preferred embodiment, there are two sensors, a first sensor mounted in a lower portion of the head and a second sensor mounted in an upper portion of the head, and there are two drive mechanisms, a first drive mechanism on which the edges of the articles ride and a second drive mechanism pushing on the back of the stack, the method for such embodiment including the steps of controlling at least the first drive mechanism in response to the difference detected at least by the first sensor to reduce such a difference; and controlling at least the second drive mechanism in response to pressure detected by both of the sensors to control orientation of the stack relative to the head and preferable to also control pressure. The drive mechanism may be controlled at a rate which is related to the difference between instantaneous and target pressure.




The foregoing in other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of a preferred embodiment of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Like reference numerals are used to refer to common elements in the various drawings.











IN THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a mixed mail feeder machine of a type in which the teachings of this invention may be utilized.





FIG. 2

is an enlarged perspective view of the front face of the singulation head for the machine shown in

FIG. 1

, which head includes sensors in accordance with the teachings of this invention.





FIG. 3

is a semi diagrammatic side sectional view illustrating a stack of articles presented to a singulation head of the type utilized in practicing the teachings of this invention.





FIG. 4

is a schematic block diagram illustrating the interconnection of various components of the mechanism of this invention for an illustrative embodiment.





FIG. 5A

is a front perspective view of a singulation head having a pair of sensors in accordance with the teachings of this invention.





FIG. 5B

is a rear perspective view of the head and sensors shown in FIG.


5


A.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 1

illustrates a mixed mail feeding machine


10


which is an example of one type of machine for which the teachings of this invention might be utilized. Machine


10


includes a mail feed mechanism


12


, a singulation head


14


, a takeaway mechanism


16


, and a control computer


18


. While computer


18


for the illustrative embodiment is shown as being located at the machine


10


and as having a keyboard and a monitor, the control computer need not be located at machine


10


; for example, several machines


10


could be controlled by a single separately located computer, or only a slave control could be located at the machine without input or output devices, the slave interfacing with a master computer.




Feeding mechanism


12


may be any of a variety of mechanisms suitable for delivering a stack of mixed mail under controlled pressure to singulation head


14


. The illustrative mechanism shown in

FIG. 1

includes a stacking table


20


having a rotating belt


22


thereon, belt


22


being driven in directions


24


by a servo motor to be discussed later. For a preferred embodiment, belt


22


passes over at least two rollers located at opposite ends of the belt, at least one of which rollers is driven by the servo motor under control of computer


18


. A paddle or plate


26


is also shown extending upwards substantially perpendicular (i.e., preferably at a slight angle ≈4° back) to belt


22


and attached by an arm


28


to the housing of the mechanism


12


in a manner so that it may be pivoted away from belt


22


. While two paddles


26


A,


26


B are shown in

FIG. 1

, for purposes of this invention only a single paddle


26


is required, and for purposes of the following discussion, it will be assumed that there is only a single paddle


26


. A separate servo motor is provided for driving paddle


26


under control of computer


28


in a manner to be discussed later. While the movements of belt


22


and paddle


26


are independent, they are coordinated by processor


18


. An indexing wall


32


is provided on the leading-edge side of table


20


.





FIG. 2

is an enlarged and more detailed view of singulation head


14


for a currently preferred embodiment. This head, which is discussed in greater detail in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/411,961, filed Oct. 4, 1999, includes a belt


34


of at least a low coefficient of friction material, and preferably a nearly friction free material (or at least having a low coefficient of friction substantially friction free outer mail-contacting surface) having perforations


36


formed therein, the belt being moved in the direction of arrow


38


. The singulation head also has various vacuum heads


40


,


42


and


44


A,


44


B for controlling positioning of the head and for assisting in doubles resolution. A lever


46


T of a top pressured sensor and a lever


46


B of a bottom pressure sensor are also shown, lever


46


T being above belt


34


and lever


46


B being below the belt.





FIG. 5A

illustrates singulation head


14


with the belt removed, the head having a pair of vacuum chambers V


1


and V


2


, the function and operation of which are discussed in detail the before mentioned co-pending application. From

FIG. 5A

it is seen that lever


46


T bears against a plunger


50


T which is constrained to move in a direction substantially perpendicular to the face


52


of singulation head


14


. Plunger


50


T is connected through a linkage mechanism


54


T to rotate a shaft of sensor


56


T, the sensor consisting of a position encoder


60


T and a servo motor


58


T. Similarly, referring particularly to

FIG. 5B

, lever


46


B bears on a plunger


50


B connected through a linkage


54


B to rotate a shaft of a bottom sensor


56


B, sensor


56


B including a precision quaditure encoder


60


B and a servo motor


58


B.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, it is seen that the angular position of top or upper position encoder


60


T and the angular position of lower position encoder


60


B are transmitted to control processor


18


. The information transmitted from encoders


60


to control processor


18


may be in analog form and digitized at the processor or each encoder may include a digitizer. Since movement of each lever


54


in a direction perpendicular to face


52


of the singulation head is converted into a rotary motion by the corresponding linkage


54


, the angular position of encoder


60


is, after calibration to be discussed later, indicative of the position of corresponding lever


46


, and thus, as will be discussed later, of the pressure applied to the sensor. Processor


18


converts the angular positions applied thereto by each encoder into a corresponding pressure value.




While various biasing mechanisms, for example coil springs, might be used to apply a bias pressure to each lever


46


, such biasing mechanisms are not precise, may not be uniform over the full pressure range to be sensed and can not easily be adjusted to vary bias pressure depending upon application. Therefore, in accordance with the teachings of this invention, servo motors


58


are utilized to apply bias to each sensor shaft, and thus to the corresponding lever


46


. The bias apply by a servo motor


58


is controlled by a signal, for example an amplified voltage, applied to the servo motor by control processor


18


. The use of servo motors


58


to provide bias pressure for the sensors assures precise control of bias pressure, uniformity of the pressure over the full sensing range and quick and easy control of the bias by merely changing the control voltage applied to the servo motor


58


by the control processor. With a precise bias pressure and a precise quadratic position encoder, movements of the lever


46


in the 10


−3


inch range may be detected, providing a precise indication of the pressure applied to each sensor.




Control processor


18


also controls the operation of a servo motor


62


driving belt


22


and a paddle feed servo motor


64


moving paddle


26


. For a preferred embodiment, belt


22


and paddle feed servo motor


64


may be moved in either direction


24


, but this is not a limitation on the invention. The servo motors may each be stopped and started with times in the microsecond range.





FIG. 3

illustrates a stack


66


of articles


68


, for example mixed mail, which are held against face


52


of singulation head


14


by paddle


26


and are moved toward face


52


in direction


24


both by belt


22


and by paddle


26


. The stack is shown as being at an angle θ to face


52


of the singulation head.




Operation




For a preferred embodiment, encoders


60


are incremental encoders and therefore need to be calibrated to provide an indication of absolute lever position. This can be accomplished by, for example, initially moving lever


46


for each of the sensors to its fully retracted or in position and indicating the position of the encoder under this condition as, for example, zero. The lever can then be moved to its fully extended position and the position of the encoder under this condition assigned an arbitrary number value, for example 198. Each click of the encoder can then be assigned some arbitrary value, each such click for example representing movement of 2×10


−3


inches for an illustrative embodiment. Other calibration procedures known in the art could also be utilized to the extent the encoder used is of a type requiring calibration.




A stack


66


of articles


68


may then be loaded against paddle


66


and servo motors


62


and


64


operated to move the stack in direction


24


toward face


52


of the singulations head. For a preferred embodiment, this movement may be done at a higher rate of speed until contact is made between the lead article of stack


66


and lever


46


B, at which time the movement may be slowed. Movement then continues until the pressure against lever


46


B is detected as being within the pick window for the machine. Processor


18


also compares the pressure against levers


46


B and


46


T to determine the angle θ. When processor


18


determines that the pressure against sensor


46


B is within the pick window and that the angle θ is within an acceptable range, then a signal is sent to singulation head


14


to initiate singulation of articles


68


.




While singulation is permitted when pressure on lever


46


B is within the pick window and angle θ is within an acceptable range, the mechanism of this invention continues to operate in an effort to optimize these parameters and to therefore minimize the possibility of doubles occurring in the singulation process. In particular, so long as the detected pressure on lever


46


B is different than an established target pressure, processor


18


operates at least servo motor


62


, and to a lessor extent servo motor


64


, speeding up or slowing down the servo motors, turning on or off the servo motors, or even reversing the direction of either one or both servo motors, as required, in order to control the pressure applied at sensor


46


B so as to reduce the difference between the instantaneous pressure at this sensor and the target pressure. For a preferred embodiment, the rate at which the servo motors are operated to change the pressure applied by stack


66


to lever


46


B varies in a way which is related to the magnitude of this difference. This variation may be substantially continuous, the rate dropping substantially uniformly as the difference decreases, or the variations may be in one or more steps.




Similarly, if the angle θ is too great so that, for example, there is no contact with sensor


46


T, or if the stack topples forward so that pressure on sensor


46


T is greater than pressure on lever


46


B, singulation can not effectively be performed and operation of singulation mechanism


14


is inhibited (i.e., processor


18


does not operate the singulation head). However, even when θ is within an acceptable range for singulation, the system continues to monitor this angle and seeks to optimize it by controlled movement of belt


22


and/or paddle


26


. For example, if stack


66


flops forward, paddle


26


may need to be moved backwards so as to permit the stack to flop over in the proper direction. However, so long as θ is different than an optimal value for this angle, servo motors


64


and


62


will be appropriately adjusted by processor


18


so as to adjust this angle in a direction to reduce the difference between the instantaneous angle and optimum angle. The rate at which these adjustments are made can, as for pressure, vary depending upon the amount of the difference.




While the invention has been described above with reference to a preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that this embodiment is being presented for purposes of illustration only and that, while for example, the use of servo motors for biasing is preferred for the reasons indicated, as is the use of the high precision quadrature encoders, for applications having lower precision requirements, other biasing and or encoding mechanisms known in the art might be utilized. Further, while a dedicated processor


18


has been shown in the Figures, the processor


18


utilized may be a general purpose processor used for controlling the system in general, the functions of processor


18


being described above being only part of the functions performed by the processor. Alternatively, a special purpose processor may be provided for this purpose or the various control functions may be performed by some combination of hardware and software. Other mechanisms may also be substituted for belt drive


22


and paddle drive


26


and, for some applications, only one of these drives, for example, paddle drive


26


, may be utilized. In addition, while both pressure and presentation angle are controlled for the preferred embodiment, in certain applications, only one of these functions may be actively controlled, for example, pressure. Finally, while the invention has been discussed primarily with respect to a mixed mail singulation application, the invention is not limited to this application and may be utilized either at other appropriate locations in a mixed mail processing system or in other applications involving the handling/separation singulation of substantially flat articles. Thus, while the invention has been shown and described above with respect to a preferred embodiment, the foregoing and other changes in form and detail may be made therein by one skilled in the art while still remaining within the spirit and scope of the invention which is to be defined only by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. In a system for singulating a stack of edge-mounted articles by use of a singulation head, a method for controlling the presentation of articles to the head including:using a sensor mounted in said head to detect the instantaneous pressure at which a leading article in said stack, which article is to be singulated, is pressed against said head; determining the difference between each said instantaneous pressure and a target pressure; and utilizing said difference to control at least one drive mechanism moving said stack of articles perpendicular to a singulating face of said head in a manner so as to reduce said difference.
  • 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein there is a pick window for said instantaneous pressure, and including the step of inhibiting operation of said singulation head during any period when said instantaneous pressure is detected as being outside said pick window.
  • 3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein there are two sensors, a first sensor mounted in a lower portion of the head and a second sensor mounted in an upper portion of said head, wherein there are two drive mechanisms, a first drive mechanism on which said edges of the articles ride and a second drive mechanism pushing on the back of said stack, andincluding the steps of controlling at least said first drive mechanism in response to said difference as detected at least by said first sensor to reduce said difference; and controlling at least said second drive mechanism in response to pressure detected by both said sensor and said second sensor to control orientation of said stack relative to said head.
  • 4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said drive mechanism is controlled at a rate which is related to said difference.
  • 5. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein there is an orientation range for said articles at which singulation can effectively be performed, and including the step of inhibiting operation of said singulation head during any period when said article orientation is outside said range.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/037,944, filed on Jan. 4, 2002, entitled “Presentation Control For Flat Article Singulation Mechanism And Sensors Suitable For Use Therewith” and now pending; which in turn is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/499,184, filed Feb. 7, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,511,062 B1 entitled “Presentation Control For Flat Article Singulation Mechanism And Sensors Suitable For Use Therewith” and now allowed.

US Referenced Citations (38)
Number Name Date Kind
3583545 Hovekamp et al. Jun 1971 A
3613863 Hedrick et al. Oct 1971 A
3941372 Matsuo Mar 1976 A
4150743 Lazzarotti et al. Apr 1979 A
4302000 Frank Nov 1981 A
4360098 Nordstrom Nov 1982 A
4401301 Hayskar Aug 1983 A
4440492 Howard Apr 1984 A
4494646 Honegger Jan 1985 A
4509735 Kosner Apr 1985 A
4566595 Fustier Jan 1986 A
4566685 Irvine et al. Jan 1986 A
4595188 Wiley et al. Jun 1986 A
4641753 Tamada Feb 1987 A
4819927 Noguchi et al. Apr 1989 A
5009321 Keough Apr 1991 A
5031223 Rosenbaum et al. Jul 1991 A
5074539 Wells et al. Dec 1991 A
5133543 Eitel et al. Jul 1992 A
5226547 Malatesta Jul 1993 A
5398922 Malatesta Mar 1995 A
5544758 Malatesta Aug 1996 A
5603492 Mandel et al. Feb 1997 A
5810158 Schiesser et al. Sep 1998 A
5839015 Faguy et al. Nov 1998 A
5915523 Spatafora Jun 1999 A
5950800 Terrell et al. Sep 1999 A
5957448 Frank et al. Sep 1999 A
5984078 Bonnett Nov 1999 A
6032946 Marshall et al. Mar 2000 A
6123330 Schaal Sep 2000 A
6217020 Supron et al. Apr 2001 B1
6259967 Hartlepp et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260841 Tranquilla Jul 2001 B1
6270069 Cera et al. Aug 2001 B1
6270070 Salomon et al. Aug 2001 B1
6443444 Cera et al. Sep 2002 B1
6511062 Blackwell et al. Jan 2003 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0 575 109 Dec 1993 EP
WO 9824564 Jun 1998 WO