A continuing goal is to have more energy saving and a lower energy bill amount for buildings (both for residential and commercial), which has an added benefit of reducing the emissions that cause global warming. One way is to reduce the amount of energy escaping/exchanging through windows. A method of measuring the efficiency of insulation for heat transfer is R-value. An R-value indicates the insulation's resistance to heat flow. (A higher R-value would indicate a greater insulating effectiveness.) The R-value generally depends on the type of insulation (e.g. material, thickness, and density). To find the R-value of a multilayered system, one would add the R-values of the individual layers.
In the current invention, press-fit storm windows are installed on existing frames or windows, without the hassle and expense of replacing the whole window (to save time, cost, and inconvenience), to increase R-value for the windows (i.e. reduce energy waste).
In the prior art, U.S. Pat. No. 7,481,030 teaches methods and structures for sealing air gaps in a building. It teaches a seal structure for sealing an air gap between a framing member and a wallboard, the seal structure being formed on a framing member from a curable, flowing material and comprising: a body having first and second opposing surfaces, the first surface of the body being bonded to the framing member; and at least one flexible seal member integral with and extending generally transversely with respect to the second surface of the body, the seal member; wherein the body and the at least one seal member are formed from air curable silicone caulk on said framing member defines a seal between the framing member and the wallboard, when the wallboard engages a distal end of the seal member.
In the U.S. Pat. No. 7,546,793 (dated Jun. 16, 2009) (titled “Window component notching system and method”), LaSusa teaches: A system and method for producing window components using polymer based, metallurgy based, extruded, injection molded, or wooden lineal material. The lineal material is notched at intervals calculated to include a stretch treatment and folded to form window components, such as window sashes, frames, and the like. Internal reinforcing members may be welded within the joints formed by folding at the notches. The notching system and method provide low cost, highly reliable, low defect production of multi-sided window components from a continuous piece of lineal material.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,490,445, Steffek et al., dated Feb. 17, 2009, titled “Integrated window sash”, teaches: An integrated window sash, which includes a sash frame having a first sheet supporting surface, a second sheet supporting surface spaced from the first sheet supporting surface, and a base between the first and second sheet supporting surfaces, the base defining an opening; a first sheet having a first major surface and an opposite second major surface with marginal edge portions of the first surface of the first sheet secured to the first sheet supporting surface, the first sheet sized to pass through the opening toward the first sheet supporting surface; a second sheet having a first major surface and an opposite second major surface with marginal edge portions of the first surface of the second sheet secured to the second sheet supporting surface, the second sheet sized to be larger than the opening, wherein the first major surface of the second sheet faces the second major surface of the first sheet and is spaced therefrom to provide a compartment between the sheets; and a retainer mounted on the base between the sheets and having a first end portion engaging surface portions of the second surface of the first sheet and an opposite second end portion secured to the base.
Embodiments of the invention address these and other problems in the prior art.
Embodiments of the present invention relate generally to easily and inexpensively adding a primary or secondary panel to an existing framed opening in a building. New demands emerging on the energy or audio characteristics of buildings are requiring increasingly expensive and difficult-to-install devices (and related methods). This particularly applies to historic buildings, but can apply to recent structures built before the awareness of the importance of energy and audio efficiency. At present, there is no device or method that is well accepted as adequately low in cost, outstanding in appearance and performance, and simultaneously easy to install. Therefore, an advantage of the preferred embodiments of the present invention is to provide energy and/or sound isolating panels suitable for use in any building.
In embodiments of the current invention, we introduced an easy way (and less expensive) of installing the press-fit storm window, on existing frames or windows, without the hassle and expense of replacing the whole window (to save time, cost, and inconvenience), to increase R-value for the windows (i.e. reduce energy waste).
In one embodiment of the inventive press-fit storm window, a transparent panel of acrylic glass, such as PLEXIGLAS, glass, or other clear rigid material is held in place by the spring action created by a continuous (or partial, conceivably) round gasket (or other spring-like gasket), that creates outward pressure around the entire exterior edge of the clear panel (or the top, left, and right sides).
The panel is held securely in place through a combination of this outward pressure and friction. The press-fit storm window can be installed on the interior or exterior of a structure. The windows are not designed to replace existing windows, but rather to supplement them by creating a tight seal between the interior space or exterior space and the existing window.
The benefits of the device are much greater insulation (R value, technically) for an existing window (energy-efficient or lower energy bills), as well as a significant reduction in noise passing through the window or portal into which the press-fit storm window is placed. The device will be dramatically less expensive than upgrading an existing single pane window to a more efficient dual pane window, without any real cutting the walls, which entails construction of the outside and inside, which means inconvenience and expense (reluctance to upgrade), for the home owners.
Another benefit is that these press-fit windows will preserve the architectural integrity of the existing windows, in older homes. Customers will be able to install the windows in a matter of minutes with no screws, nails, or adhesives, which points to a third major benefit of the windows: They provide dramatic environmental and efficiency improvements, while preserving the architectural integrity of homes.
The other figures display various views and configurations for the setup described above.
In an example, item 603 or 607 or 637 in
In one of the embodiments, a rubber bulb is added around all edges of a rigid plastic sheet cut to fit inside a window frame. It was intended that metal clips be used to ensure that the panel would stay in place. The assembled panel was first pressed tightly inside the frame. To their surprise, when attempting to remove the panel from the frame, it was found to be necessary to use a prying device. This indicated that the use of the metal clips would unexpectedly not be required, thereby greatly simplifying installation. Thus, this embodiment is very simple, practical, and yet, still, strong.
However, other methods can be combined here, as well: For example, in another embodiment, the panel can also be attached with glues, mechanical clamps, screws, or spring-like o-rings, or combinations of the above. The pressure can be exerted on all sides, one or more sides, locally at the corners, at a selected points only, or by suction (due to pressure difference between the two sides). For example, by a slight variation of the pressure on both sides, the difference on the pressure can partially or fully hold the panel in place.
In another embodiment, the panel can be in place using hangers, belts, chains, ribbons, frames, railings, or gap in frame of the window. In another embodiment, the panel can be hung through a metal or plastic rebar perpendicular to the surface of the panel.
In another embodiment, the panel can be held using its own weight or gravity, partially or fully supported, by using the slight inclined surface, with respect to the ground and a plane perpendicular to the ground. That is, we held the panel not exactly perpendicular to the ground or 90 degrees, but slightly off, say e.g. at the 85 degree angle, with respect to the ground (instead of 90 degrees). It can vary in the range of 80 to 89 degrees, for example.
In another embodiment, the panel can be curved, rather than flat, to stand on it own, based on its center of gravity. This way, the panel can stand on its own by its weight, fully or partially, as long as the center of gravity for the panel is within the boundary of the shadow of the window's frame, to have a stable system, holding up on its own. Of course, we can combine the embodiments above, to make the panel better attached to the window or frame, in the case of snow, fast wind, or storm.
Additional embodiments are, in combination or not-in-combination to above:
i. Use trim with multiple slots or openings to accept the panels. This would allow multi-pane windows.
ii. Use separate corner pieces of trim and bulb, to eliminate bevel cuts and improve appearance.
iii. Use stiffeners before installing trim.
The material used for frames can be plastic, metal, elastic, man-made, natural, or a combination of the above. The shape of windows can be square, rectangular, circle, ellipse, polygon, curved, irregular, symmetric, or not-symmetric, as an example.
Here are more variations and examples:
1. Panel(s) (fills framed opening in building):
a. Materials:
b. Purposes:
c. Light Transmission:
d. Shape:
2. Trim (fastens over and frames edge of panel):
a. Material:
b. Shape:
3. Internal Clip (internal to and stiffens trim):
a. Material:
b. Shape:
4. Bulb (fastened to or same extrusion as trim):
a. Material:
b. Shape:
5. Corner Pieces (eliminates necessity of beveling trim/bulb):
a. Material:
b. Shape (cross-section)
6. Stiffeners (applied at panel edges to improve overall panel stiffness)
a. Material:
b. Shape:
Any variations of the teachings above are also meant to be covered and protected by this current application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1928992 | Clark et al. | Oct 1933 | A |
2612947 | Jenks | Oct 1952 | A |
2691193 | Wissinger | Oct 1954 | A |
2700196 | Panhard | Jan 1955 | A |
2825941 | Lux et al. | Mar 1958 | A |
2837782 | White | Jun 1958 | A |
3110065 | Dennis | Nov 1963 | A |
3159884 | Hankey | Dec 1964 | A |
3251399 | Grossman | May 1966 | A |
3363390 | Crane et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3438150 | Heim | Apr 1969 | A |
3911630 | Nally | Oct 1975 | A |
3952455 | McAlarney | Apr 1976 | A |
4040210 | Land | Aug 1977 | A |
D247047 | Damiana | Jan 1978 | S |
4098035 | Bessler | Jul 1978 | A |
4255907 | Lightell | Mar 1981 | A |
4355448 | Ezaki | Oct 1982 | A |
4407099 | McLaughlin | Oct 1983 | A |
4424976 | Hayashi | Jan 1984 | A |
4430374 | Ezaki | Feb 1984 | A |
4453855 | Richter et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4477507 | Kunert | Oct 1984 | A |
4486990 | Bauch | Dec 1984 | A |
4592180 | Gerritsen | Jun 1986 | A |
4599825 | Sixsmith | Jul 1986 | A |
4668556 | Hermann et al. | May 1987 | A |
4682443 | Demo | Jul 1987 | A |
4703598 | Wilson et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4706729 | Sixsmith | Nov 1987 | A |
4946174 | Usui | Aug 1990 | A |
5011163 | Hermann et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5131194 | Anderson | Jul 1992 | A |
5209498 | Colin | May 1993 | A |
5305552 | Guillon | Apr 1994 | A |
5312672 | Dittmeier et al. | May 1994 | A |
5361542 | Dettloff | Nov 1994 | A |
5390974 | Theodorakakos | Feb 1995 | A |
5737885 | Stoyke | Apr 1998 | A |
5809707 | Bargados et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819472 | Frost | Oct 1998 | A |
5937595 | Miller | Aug 1999 | A |
6052957 | Minnich | Apr 2000 | A |
6223497 | Ohtake et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6460300 | Mikkaichi et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6684574 | Hayashi | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6742565 | Badley | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6865850 | Campbell | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6877286 | Johnson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6922945 | Dron | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945540 | Bormann et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7228662 | John | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7481030 | Grunst | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7490445 | Steffek et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7546793 | LaSusa | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20070113482 | Dumke et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20090025317 | Wirz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
88 04 447 | Dec 1988 | DE |
2 759 112 | Aug 1998 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110078963 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |