This disclosure relates generally to gaskets for creating a seal between a pair of facing mating surfaces and more particularly to so-called press-in-place or spaghetti gaskets configured to be pressed into a groove formed in one or more of the mating surfaces.
Press-in-place gaskets are well known for sealing between a pair of flanges that are secured together in face-to-face relationship with bolts or the like. Such gaskets, sometimes referred to as spaghetti gaskets, generally are relatively thin bands of rubber or similar material that are injection molded to have a shape corresponding to that of a groove formed in the surface of one (or both) of the flanges to be sealed. The press-in-place gasket, as its name implies, is pressed into the groove before the flanges are joined and bolted together. A cross-sectional profile of the gasket may be configured to hold the gasket in place within the groove and to control the compression of the gasket as the flange and its mating flange are bolted together, whereupon the gasket forms a seal between the mating surfaces. Some press-in-place gaskets are made with a metal core to, among other things; help the gaskets hold their shape before and during installation. These metal core gaskets generally are fabricated in an injection mold wherein a metal core in the shape of the gasket is placed in the injection mold. The rubberized gasket material is then injection molded around the metal to form the gasket.
Prior press-in-place gaskets, and methods of making them, have exhibited inherent problems and shortcomings. For example, the cost of an injection mold for molding press-in-place gaskets can be exceedingly expensive and generally requires weeks of time for its production. This also means that there can be no substantive changes in the shape or configuration of the gasket once the mold maker begins the task of making the mold. Further, a modification in the gasket before or after the mold is finished usually requires that a new mold be created, taking time and consuming substantial financial resources. It often is useful for a designer of power train components to have access to prototypes of gaskets to be used in power train components in order to test and refine the components and surfaces to be sealed. Unfortunately, it is problematic to provide prototypes of press-in-place gaskets since the injection molding process by which they are made is expensive, slow, and does not lend itself readily to rapid prototyping techniques.
A need exists for a press-in-place gasket and a method of making press-in-place gaskets that addresses these and other problems of the prior art. It is to the provision of such a gasket and method that this disclosure is primarily directed.
Briefly described, a method of fabricating press-in-place gaskets includes extruding a rubberized gasket material around a central core made of a malleable material such as aluminum to form a continuous elongated strand of gasket stock. The gasket stock has a predetermined outer profile and may be wound onto storage reels for storage and/or shipment. The method further includes incrementally moving the gasket stock through a computer controlled bender having heads that bend the gasket stock into a desired programmed shape corresponding to the shape of a groove in a flange. When the bending is complete the strand is cut and the resulting free ends may be bonded together to form a continuous closed press-in-place gasket. Press-in-place gaskets having unique characteristics according to the invention and press-in-place gaskets formed by the unique method of the invention are also within the scope of the invention. Once fabricated, the press-in-place gaskets can be used in a manner similar to traditional injection molded press-in-place gaskets by pressing them into a groove formed in a mating surface and clamping the corresponding mating surface to the first mating surface.
The method of the invention eliminates the requirement to form an injection mold in which to mold press-in-place gaskets. Further, a press-in-place gasket of virtually any shape can be fabricated in an exceedingly short time since the shape of the gasket is determined in a digital profile such as a CAD or other electronic file. Significant also is the fact that changes can be made to a gasket design at any time in the process, and those changes can be implemented simply by revising the digital profile in the computer and “bend forming” the new gasket. Prototypes having perhaps various different shapes can be delivered in short order to power train component designers for research and development purposes and for a fraction of the cost of traditional injection molded press-in-place gaskets. Accordingly, press-in-place gaskets and methods of fabricating them are now provided that address the problems above and provide other benefits and advantages not possible with traditional injection molding techniques. These and other aspects, features, and advantages will be better appreciated upon review of the detailed description set forth below taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures, which are briefly described as follows.
Referring now in more detail to the drawing figures, wherein like reference numerals indicate like parts throughout the several views,
The core is encased in a jacket 13 made of gasket material. The gasket material may be any compressible material suitable for use as a press-in-place gasket including, without limitation, a thermoset rubber, a polymer, an acrylic, a polyacrylic, an elastomer, a composite, or combinations thereof. As detailed below, the jacket 13 is extruded around the core 12 and is formed to exhibit an exterior profile of a desired shape. In the embodiment of
The die is formed to shape the jacket material with a desired exterior profile, such as those shown in
A bending head 48 is disposed just downstream of the alignment block 47 and the gasket stock 43 extends from the alignment block through the bending head 48. With reference to
Referring to
To fabricate a press-in-place gasket of desired configuration, the desired finished shape of the gasket is established in a CAD or other electronic file. This file is received into the computer that is programmed to control the apparatus 41 and the computer carries out its program instructions to form the gasket according to the specification in the electronic file. More specifically, the computer controls the vice 44 to grip the gasket stock 43 and to move the stock in the downstream direction until the location of a desired bend in the stock aligns with the edges 55 of the anvil 51. With the gasket stock so located, the computer then controls the platter 50 and thus the bending dogs 52 and 53 to rotate in the direction of the desired bend in the gasket stock. As the end of a bending dog engages the gasket stock, it begins to bend the gasket stock as shown in
The vice is then controlled to move the gasket stock to the incremental location of the next desired bend and the platter and bending dogs form the next bend in a similar manner. It will thus be seen that a press-in-place gasket 54 is progressively formed having multiple bends that define a shape that corresponds to that specified in the CAD or electronic file. This is exemplified in
Once the gasket shape is completed, the gasket stock is cut at the appropriate place to form a free end. This free end can then be joined to the opposite free end of the formed gasket to complete the continuous press-in-place gasket 61 as illustrated in
Regardless of the bonding technique, the result is a continuous press-in-place gasket that is ready to be pressed into a matching shape groove in a surface to form a seal, as shown in
In view of the forgoing discussion, it now will be understood by the skilled artisan that press-in-place gaskets of virtually any shape and configuration can be formed quickly, reliably, and without the need to make injection molds in which to form the gaskets. Test gaskets of various configurations can be made to order and be immediately available to power train designers and others for testing various designs and gasket configurations for a particular purpose. Further, power train designers are now free to make changes in the designs of mating surfaces to be sealed right up until production; and press-in-place gaskets to accommodate these changes can be fabricated and made immediately available to designers at very little cost. This level of flexibility simply has not been available to power train designers and others in the past.
The invention has been described herein in terms of preferred embodiments and methodologies that exemplify the invention and are considered by the inventors to represent the best modes of carrying out the invention. The skilled artisan will understand, however, that a wide gamut of additions, deletions, and substitutions, both subtle and gross, might well be made to the illustrated embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is determined only by the claims. For example, while the disclosure is particularly applicable to gaskets for power trains of vehicles and other equipment, it may be applied to the formation of gaskets for virtually any press-in-place application. Such gaskets may be useful in the pluming industry, for sealing oil and gas pipeline sections, and many other applications. Thus, the invention is not limited to any particular end application. The particular bending head configuration illustrated herein is an example only and is not limiting. Bending devices of other configurations are within the scope of the invention so long as they meet the requirements detailed above for forming the press-in gasket stock into desired shapes. These and other modifications, both subtle and gross, are possible without departing from the scope of the invention exemplified above.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/727,759, filed on 19 Nov. 2012, and entitled “Press-in-place Gaskets and Fabrication Methods”, which application is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
914422 | Jones | Mar 1909 | A |
2459721 | Poltorak | Jan 1949 | A |
2880019 | Wurtz et al. | Mar 1959 | A |
3124502 | Radke | Mar 1964 | A |
3660192 | Smith et al. | May 1972 | A |
3949591 | Gregoire | Apr 1976 | A |
4174990 | Meister | Nov 1979 | A |
4300379 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4926600 | Mesnel | May 1990 | A |
5022663 | Fages et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5082297 | Flasher | Jan 1992 | A |
5121951 | Harbom et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5492336 | Barna et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5536018 | Szott | Jul 1996 | A |
5551706 | Barna et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5653450 | De Villepoix et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
6446979 | Steinetz et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6942827 | Gernand et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7806413 | Hurlbert et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7867422 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20020130434 | Rigali et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040232624 | Hisano et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060220324 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247949 | Shorrosh | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080001366 | Gladfelter | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20110133366 | Lim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2026367 | Jan 1990 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140138919 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61727759 | Nov 2012 | US |