1. Field of the Invention
The subject of the invention is press tool.
2. Discussion of the Background
The manufacture of mechanical parts by pressing of powders to give a compact blank, followed by fritting, can involve the use of uniaxial compression including a die consisting of a housing in which the powder is poured, and a punch which is engaged in the housing to produce the compression of the powder or, as a variant, a pair of punches which are engaged in two opposing ends of the housing in two opposite directions. These presses operate at relatively high rates. They have numerous applications: they can concern metal or ceramic mechanical parts such as gears, magnets, nuclear fuel pellets, etc.
This type of method does, however, have disadvantages. One of the most substantial appears when the compressed part is removed from the mould by gradually taking it out of the housing an axial push movement of the punch. The compression has produced radial stresses in the part, which are released as it is removed from the housing, producing a radial expansion. The risks of damage to the part by cracking or breaking are frequent in the orifice of the housing, between the portions which are still stressed and the portions which have suddenly been released, in which stress concentrations appear. Various methods have been used to improve the quality of the parts. One may mention the use of lubricating additives or binders in the powders, or the choice of particular compression sequences by the punches; but additives impair fritting since they are volatile and can be polluting, and the second methods reduce production rates substantially. These two groups of methods also remedy other faults to some degree, such as insufficient cohesion of the material after compression.
Other methods consist in giving the orifice of the housing of the die a bevel or a connection radius to prevent a sudden transition between the stressed state and released state for the part whilst it is being removed from the mould, but this method is effective only with well-determined orifice profiles which are specific to each variety of part, rendering it difficult to implement.
Still other methods consist in adding in the die tubes made of rubber or other flexible materials which facilitate removal from the mould and are then sacrificed, but this is also costly.
Finally, another type of method, described for example in document U.S. Pat. No. 7,128,547, consists in dividing the die into sectors which are assembled during the compression phase and then separated so as to release the residual compression stresses simultaneously for the entire part. Embodiments of such methods often do not include any means to retain the die sectors once the die has been untightened, making them unfit for automation. Others include a mechanism for controlling the movements of the sectors enabling the method to be automated, but they are complex, involving the use of actuators of the sectors, and they do not truly guarantee that the sectors are satisfactorily contiguous when the powder is poured, a necessary factor for satisfactory manufacture.
A variant of this design consists in tightening the die using springs, an external pressure or any other means to reduce its diameter during pressing; it is described in documents EP-A-1 602 473, U.S. Pat. No. 5,694,640 and in the article by Holownia “Balanced die method for metal powder compaction”, published in Powder Metallurgy, vol. 39, no3, Money Publishing. The tightening is stopped after the pressing, enabling the die to expand in order to reduce the extraction friction of the formed part, and thus facilitate mould-removal. The technical problem is slightly different, and these methods do not help improve the transition of the stresses when the die is removed between the portion removed from the mould and the portion still contained in the die. It should also be observed that, in these examples, the centripetal pressure is applied only to the centre of the die, whereas the edges are held rigidly in the device and therefore have no flexibility.
The invention has been designed to obviate these disadvantages and to allow automatic and reliable compression of parts at a high rate, whilst reducing the risks of damage on removal from the mould, and subsequent shape and dimension faults.
In a general form, the invention thus concerns a press tool including a die, an armature external to the die, a flexible tube forming a central housing in which part pressings are accomplished, and an insert, positioned between the flexible tube and the armature, and which is mobile when moved by a mechanism, characterised in that the insert slides over the tube and extends as far as one end of the tube, by which the pressed parts are extracted from the housing, and in that the insert releases the said end, which is separated from the armature by a gap, in another position.
The effect of this arrangement is that it enables the tube to bend when it expands near the mould-removal orifice, and thus yield partially to the part's inner compression stresses. These inner stresses are partially released before the mould-removal, as the mould-removal orifice is approached, such that the transition between the removed parts and the parts still present in the housing is greatly attenuated when the part is removed, and such that the stress concentrations traditionally observed at the junction between these two states of the part are extremely reduced or have even disappeared.
A flexible tube is superior to a bevel or a traditional rounding at the top of the housing, since it bends in response to the distribution of the inner stresses in the mould-removal direction, and in that it therefore adopts, by itself, a profile enabling the stress concentrations to be greatly reduced. And it makes for a die of simpler design than segmented dies, where there is no risk that the housing will not close satisfactorily.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention the tube is joined to the armature by a skirt at one end of the armature opposite the extraction position, the armature encompasses a recess partially formed by the skirt, and the insert includes a moving protruberance in the recess between stop states on facing walls of the recess.
The invention will now be described with reference to the following figures:
and
The problem experienced in the course of mould-removal is illustrated in
Reference should be made to
During most of the manufacturing process the state is that of
An essential property of the tube 16 is that it must be sufficiently flexible to be able to expand, and this flexibility is determined by its thickness. It must therefore be fine, for example having a thickness of between 0.5 and 1 mm if it is made from tungsten carbide, which has satisfactory resistance to wear and tear. The insert 17 is normally thicker, but its dimensions are not critical, and it may consist of a steel tube 2 to 10 mm thick. Finally, the armature 15 can have the shape of a cylindrical sleeve 10 to 15 mm thick, also made from steel.
According to a development of the invention, during operation, the insert may be completely taken out of contact with the tube, so as to eliminate the friction forces during mould-removal. A sufficiently large sliding area should then be provided to release these two elements from one another.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09 50407 | Jan 2009 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/050555 | 1/19/2010 | WO | 00 | 8/8/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/084110 | 7/29/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2558823 | Hossenlopp et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
2942298 | Loedding | Jun 1960 | A |
5694640 | Greetham | Dec 1997 | A |
7381046 | Kuo | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393370 | Peterman et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8167602 | Hartner | May 2012 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 602 473 | Dec 2005 | EP |
454 133 | Feb 1975 | SU |
1 303 436 | Apr 1987 | SU |
1 315 135 | Jun 1987 | SU |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued Apr. 16, 2010, in PCT/EP2010/050555. |
B. P. Holownia, “Balanced die method for metal powder compaction”, Powder Metallurgy, vol. 39, No. 3, XP-000641581, Jan. 1, 1996, pp. 207-209. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110280982 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |