The present invention generally relates to systems for sewing textile materials or work pieces, and in particular, to a control system for controlling the engagement of the presser foot of a sewing station when sewing thicker, heavier gauge materials.
Top feed systems that include a top feed dog and/or a feed belt for feeding work pieces through a sewing station are known. In such systems, the fabric material will be engaged between the top feed dog and a bottom feed dog, so as to pull the fabric material therebetween for feeding the fabric material through the sewing station. Such top feed systems generally are used for feeding heavier gauged fabric materials by compressing the fabric material against the bottom feed dogs and pulling the material forward in a walking motion as the material is sewn. However, with especially thick, heavy gauge fabric materials such as foamed pads and/or border materials for mattresses, the thickness of such textile materials can create a problem during sewing when the presser foot of the sewing station must apply added pressure to compress the fabric material to an amount sufficient to enable the needle to penetrate far enough so that the stroke of the loopers engages the threads of the sewing needle. Without such compression, the needle will not penetrate fully through the fabric and thus the threads being sewn by the needle accordingly will not be engaged by the loopers, resulting in an improperly sewn work piece that must be discarded or resewn. The problem with applying such added pressure to the presser foot is, however, that the resulting tighter engagement of the presser foot with the material work piece tends to create friction or drag that can hinder the movement of the material and resist the clamping engagement between the top and bottom feed dogs. As a result, as the top feed dog engages and bears against the fabric, instead of moving the fabric under the presser foot, the top feed dog can tend to pick or tear the fabric material as it moves thereover, resulting in an unacceptable work piece.
In an effort to address this problem, prior art devices have included systems that apply pressure to the presser foot, such as through springs or cylinders, during the penetration of the needle and engagement of the loopers therewith. Thereafter, as the needle stroke or cycle is completed and the needle is raised, a mechanical linkage tied to the feed dogs causes the presser foot to be raised as the top feed dog is lowered into engagement with the material in its stepping or walking motion. As the feed dogs complete the pulling cycle and the top feed dog begins to be raised, the mechanical linkage thereafter allows the presser foot to be lowered back down into compressive engagement with the upper surface of the fabric. A problem that exists with such a rigid, structured mechanical linkage is that it tends to significantly limit the speed of operation of the sewing machine, thus limiting the production rates of such sewing systems. In addition, these mechanical linkages are hard to lubricate because they cannot be sealed and thus typically are subject to significant friction and vibration. Further, the lubrication of such systems must be limited to avoid soiling or contaminating the fabrics being sewn with excess oil or other applied lubricants.
Accordingly, it can be seen that a need exists for a system that controls the application of pressure to a presser foot during the sewing of thicker or heavier gauge fabrics that enables greater production rates and speeds and addresses the foregoing related and unrelated problems in the art.
Briefly described, the present invention generally relates to a presser foot control system for controlling the application of additional pressure or compressive force to the presser foot of a sewing station to compress thicker or heavier gauge fabric materials being sewn. The additional pressure ensures that the needles of the sewing station will penetrate the fabric material a sufficient amount to enable the loopers of the sewing station to engage and pickup the needle threads during a sewing or flanging operation.
The presser foot control system generally includes a pressure control assembly mounted adjacent a sewing area of the sewing station. The pressure control assembly generally includes an actuator such as a hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder, motor, spring set, or mechanically timed drive mechanism that will be actuated and de-actuated by a control system of the sewing station in timed relation to the reciprocation of sewing needles of the sewing station so as to periodically compress and release the fabric material being sewn. The actuator generally will be connected to a presser foot lift lever having a first or proximal end to which the presser foot is mounted, a second or distal end, and a pivot point intermediate the first and second ends. A compression spring or similar biasing member further can be mounted between the actuator and presser foot lift lever for applying a nominal compression force to the presser foot for maintaining contact and slight compression of the fabric material being sewn during transfer or movement of the fabric material through the sewing area.
The presser foot lift lever further is generally connected to a drive mechanism that typically includes an eccentric connected to the main drive shaft of the sewing station, which communicates the reciprocal motion of the needles to the presser foot lift lever of the presser foot control system. Thus, as the needles are reciprocated downwardly into the fabric material for sewing, the presser foot likewise is urged downwardly by the presser foot lift lever against the upper surface of the fabric material. At the same time, the actuator will be engaged by the control system of the sewing system so as to apply additional compression pressure or force to the presser foot as needed to further compress the fabric material to an amount sufficient to enable the loopers to catch and pull the threads from the sewing needles for completing a sewing operation. Thereafter, as the needles move upwardly along their return stroke, such movement is translated to the presser foot lift lever, which accordingly pivots the presser foot upwardly. At the same time, the actuator is deactivated to release the pressure therefrom, so as to reduce the compressive force being applied to the fabric material to an amount sufficient to enable the feed dogs, feed belt or other feeding mechanism of the sewing system to engage and incrementally advance the fabric material through the sewing area.
Alternatively, the action of the presser foot lift lever can be further extenuated or additional compressive force can be applied, such as by the use of compression springs, to maintain the presser foot in a lowered, compressive position. The actuator then can be used to pull or lift the presser foot against this biasing or compressive force as needed to allow incremental transfer or movement of the fabric material.
Various objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings in greater detail, the presser foot control system 10 of the present invention is generally illustrated in
As shown in the
Thereafter, as the fabric material is sewn, the control system of the sewing station will engage the actuator to periodically apply additional pressure as needed in timed relation with the reciprocation of the needles to compress the fabric material being sewn as needed to ensure engagement and pickup of the needle threads by the loopers (not shown) of the sewing station. A adjustable pressure plate 31 (
Still further, it will be understood that while a cylinder or other actuator can be used to apply additional pressure at timed intervals as needed to cause the presser foot to further compress the textile or fabric material panel being sewn, it is also possible to reverse the operation of the actuator for relieving pressure applied to the presser foot as needed. In such a system, a full compression force generally will be applied to the presser foot, such as by the compression spring 29 or through some other pressure applicator or mechanism. At timed intervals during the sewing operation, the actuator 26 can be engaged to counteract such a full compression pressure being applied to the presser foot to enable and/or cause the presser foot to be raised from its compressive engagement with the fabric material panel for the continued transfer/movement of the fabric material panel.
As further shown in
Still further, the presser foot control system will be linked to the operation of the main drive shaft 19 of the sewing station by an eccentric drive system 40 as shown in
In operation, as the sewing station sews a thick, padded, or heavy gauge fabric material work piece or multi-ply panel as indicated in
At about the same time, the top and bottom feed dogs will engage and begin pulling or advancing the fabric panel or work piece incrementally through the sewing station, independently of the operation and movement of the presser foot control system. Thereafter, as the feed dogs complete their incremental forward movement of the fabric panel, the presser foot again is lowered into engagement with the fabric panel and the actuator is reengaged to apply the additional needed pressure as the sewing cycle continues. As a result, the application of the additional pressure as needed for sewing thicker, padded or multiple work pieces can be more precisely controlled to enable faster production speeds for the sewing station during the sewing of the thicker, heavier gauge fabric materials or other work pieces.
It will be further understood by those skilled in the art that while the foregoing has been disclosed above with respect to preferred embodiments or features, various additions, changes, and modifications can be made to the foregoing invention without departing from the spirit and scope of thereof.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/460,454, filed Apr. 3, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1947058 | Pittoni | Feb 1934 | A |
3013513 | Judelson | Dec 1961 | A |
3055326 | Greulich | Sep 1962 | A |
3490061 | Docker | Jan 1970 | A |
3641954 | Kalning et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3673906 | Cash | Jul 1972 | A |
4013026 | Hall | Mar 1977 | A |
4019447 | Blessing et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4043282 | Fanghanel | Aug 1977 | A |
4058071 | Dunn et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4067269 | Fanghanel | Jan 1978 | A |
4117790 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4141304 | Masuda | Feb 1979 | A |
4181085 | Conner, Jr. | Jan 1980 | A |
4290376 | Brusasca | Sep 1981 | A |
4381722 | Takeuchi et al. | May 1983 | A |
4449464 | Porter | May 1984 | A |
4462129 | Brannock | Jul 1984 | A |
4498404 | Sadeh | Feb 1985 | A |
4691651 | Junemann | Sep 1987 | A |
4703706 | Plante | Nov 1987 | A |
4726309 | Popp | Feb 1988 | A |
4742789 | Pestel et al. | May 1988 | A |
4776579 | Romand et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4794873 | Dordi et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4813364 | Boser | Mar 1989 | A |
4821656 | Dordi et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825787 | Babson et al. | May 1989 | A |
4827856 | Rohr | May 1989 | A |
4838186 | Resta et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4905615 | Pofferi | Mar 1990 | A |
4958579 | De Weers | Sep 1990 | A |
4998965 | Easom | Mar 1991 | A |
5018462 | Brocklehurst | May 1991 | A |
5138962 | Klundt | Aug 1992 | A |
5145144 | Resta et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5185897 | Van Laanen | Feb 1993 | A |
5282433 | Freermann et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289788 | Fukumoto | Mar 1994 | A |
5309854 | Mulcahey et al. | May 1994 | A |
5341755 | Kawasaki | Aug 1994 | A |
5367968 | Diaz | Nov 1994 | A |
5483909 | Nogueras | Jan 1996 | A |
5515796 | Ogle et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526761 | Mulcahey et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5529004 | Porter et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537699 | Bonaddio et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5560308 | Eto | Oct 1996 | A |
5586511 | Porter et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5617802 | Cash | Apr 1997 | A |
5647293 | Price et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5678502 | Mulcahey et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5809919 | Mitchell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5881656 | Grant | Mar 1999 | A |
5915319 | Price et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5943971 | Trickett et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6000352 | Porter et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6202579 | Olewicz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209468 | Marcangelo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6397768 | Dasher et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6520101 | Sano et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6648585 | Block et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6736077 | Pokrishevsky et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
20020050117 | Dasher et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
31 39426 | Apr 1983 | DE |
37 12493 | May 1987 | DE |
0264 618 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0 330 285 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0 200 368 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0682135 | Nov 1995 | EP |
1567893 | Sep 1967 | FR |
1384073 | Feb 1975 | GB |
7308465 | Nov 1995 | JP |
WO 9212282 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO 9525194 | Sep 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60460454 | Apr 2003 | US |