Downhole drilling operations commonly require a downhole tool to be actuated after the tool has been deployed in the borehole. For example, underreamers are commonly tripped into the borehole in a collapsed state (i.e., with the cutting structures retracted into the underreamer tool body). At some desired depth (or location), the underreamer is actuated such that the cutting structures expand radially outward from the tool body thereby engaging the borehole wall. Hydraulic actuation mechanisms are well known in oilfield services operations and are commonly employed, and even desirable, in such operations.
For example, one well-known hydraulic actuation methodology involves wireline retrieval of a plug (or “dart”) through the interior of the drill string to create differential pressure to actuate an underreamer. Upon completion of the reaming operation, the underreamer may be deactuated by redeploying the dart. While commercially serviceable, such wireline actuation and deactuation mechanisms are both expensive and time-consuming in that they require concurrent use of wireline or slick line assemblies.
Another commonly used hydraulic actuation methodology makes use of shear pins designed to shear at or above a specific differential pressure (or in a predetermined range of pressures). Ball drop mechanisms are also known in the art, in which a ball is dropped down through the drill string to a ball seat. Engagement of the ball with the seat typically causes an increase in differential pressure which in turn actuates the downhole tool. The tool may be deactuated by increasing the pressure beyond a predetermined threshold such that the ball is urged through the seat. While such shear pin and ball drop mechanisms are also commercially serviceable, they are generally one-time or one-cycle mechanisms and do not typically allow for repeated actuation and deactuation of a downhole tool. Moreover, ball drop mechanisms generally require that the drill string have an unobstructed through bore extending from the surface to the ball seat. As such, ball drop mechanisms are not typically suitable for near bit tool deployments (e.g., tool deployments that are below measurement while drilling “MWD” and logging while drilling “LWD” tools).
There remains a need in the art for a hydraulic actuation assembly that enables a downhole tool, such as an underreamer or a stabilizer, to be actuated and deactuated substantially any number of times during a drilling operation without breaking the tool string and/or tripping the tool out of the borehole.
A downhole tool including a pressure activated flow switch is disclosed. One or more disclosed tool embodiments include a block assembly (e.g., a reaming block) deployed in an axial recess of a tool body. The block assembly is configured to translate between radially retracted and radially extended positions in response to differential pressure. The flow switch is deployed external to the flow bore in an annular region between the tool body and a tool mandrel. The flow switch includes a flow piston configured to reciprocate between axially opposed open and closed positions in the annular region such that the block assembly is radially extended when the flow piston is in the open position and radially retracted when the flow piston is in the closed position. The flow piston is configured to translate from the closed position to the open position when a differential pressure between the flow bore of the downhole tool and a chamber of the downhole tool exceeds a predetermined threshold. The flow piston may be further configured to remain in the open position at differential pressures less than the threshold.
The disclosed embodiments may provide one or more technical advantages. For example, in the disclosed embodiments the flow switch is deployed entirely external to the central flow bore of the downhole tool. Such deployment tends to advantageously preserve the cross sectional area of the flow bore thereby providing no obstruction to drilling fluid flowing towards the drill bit. This acts to minimize both the pressure drop through the tool and erosion of internal tool components during use. Moreover, external deployment of the flow switch enables the downhole tool to be deployed low in the BHA (e.g., just above the drill bit).
The disclosed embodiments further enable a downhole tool to be selectively and repeatedly actuated and deactuated substantially any number of times without breaking the drill string and/or or tripping the tool out of the borehole. The disclosed embodiments further obviate the need for physical actuation and deactuation (e.g., including the use of darts, ball drops, and the like).
One or more embodiments of the invention may further make use of upper and lower thresholds thereby enabling the downhole tool to remain either actuated or deactuated over a wide range of operating pressures. This feature of the disclosed embodiments may enhance operational certainty as it tends to eliminate inadvertent actuation and deactuation.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosed subject matter, and advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
During a typical drilling operation, drilling fluid (commonly referred to as “mud” in the art) is pumped downward through the drill string 30 and the bottom hole assembly (BHA) where it emerges at or near the drill bit 32 at the bottom of the borehole 40. The mud serves several purposes, for example, including cooling and lubricating the drill bit, clearing cuttings away from the drill bit and transporting them to the surface, and stabilizing and sealing the formation(s) through which the borehole 40 traverses. The discharged mud, along with the borehole cuttings and sometimes other borehole fluids, then flow upwards through the borehole annulus 42 (the space between the drill string 30 and the borehole wall) to the surface. In the disclosed exemplary embodiments, the downhole tool uses differential pressure, e.g., between an internal flow channel and the annulus, to selectively actuate and deactuate certain tool functionality (e.g., the radial extension of a cutting structure or a stabilizer blade outward from a tool body).
It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the deployment illustrated on
In one or more of the disclosed embodiments, the reaming block 150 includes a plurality of splines (not shown) on the lateral sides thereof. The splines are sized and shaped to engage corresponding splines (not shown) on the lateral tool body sides of the recess 115. Interconnection between these sets of splines may advantageously increase the surface area of contact between the reaming block 150 and the tool body 110 thereby providing a robust structure suitable for downhole operations (e.g., downhole reaming or stabilizing operations). The splines are angled such that they are non-parallel with respect to a longitudinal axis 102 of the underreamer 100. Thus, relative axial motion between the reaming block 150 and the tool body 110 causes a corresponding radial extension or retraction of the reaming block 150. In the depicted embodiment the splines are angled such that the reaming block 150 is radially extended via uphole axial motion thereof with respect to the tool body 110, although the disclosed embodiments are not limited in regard to the spline configuration. Commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,732,817, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein, discloses suitable reaming block configurations.
The radially facing outer surface (also referred to in the art as the gauge surface) of the reaming block 150 may optionally be fitted with various cutting elements. Substantially any cutting elements suitable for downhole reaming operations may be utilized, for example, including polycrystalline diamond cutter (PDC) inserts, thermally stabilized polycrystalline (TSP) inserts, diamond inserts, boron nitride inserts, abrasive materials, and the like. The reaming block 150 may alternatively or additionally include various wear protection measures deployed thereon, for example, including the use of wear buttons, hardfacing materials, or various other wear resistant coatings. The reaming block 150 may also include wear resistant stabilizer pads. It will be understood that the disclosed embodiments are not limited to any particular cutting element configuration or wear protection measures.
Extension and retraction of the reaming block 150 is now described in more detail. In the depicted embodiment, the reaming block 150 is deployed axially between spring biasing 130 and hydraulic actuation 140 mechanisms that are in turn deployed in the tool body 110. An internal mandrel 120 is deployed in the tool body 110 internal to the spring biasing mechanism 130 and the reaming block 150. The mandrel 120 includes a central through bore 122 that provides a channel for the flow of drilling fluid through the tool 100. The depicted spring biasing mechanism 130 includes a compression spring 132 deployed about the mandrel 120 in a spring retainer 133 and axially between an upper cap 135 and a stop ring 137. The upper cap is rigidly connected with the tool body 110 such that the compression spring 132 is configured to bias the reaming block 150 in the downhole direction. The spring bias also urges the reaming block 150 radially inward (due to the configuration of the angled splines described above).
The hydraulic actuation mechanism 140 is configured to urge the reaming block 150 in the uphole direction against the spring bias when a differential pressure between a chamber of tool 100 and the bore 122 of tool 100 (i.e., pressure from the flow bore 122) is greater than a predetermined threshold. The depicted embodiment includes an axial piston 142 sealingly engaged with an inner surface 111 of the tool body 110 and an outer surface 123 of the mandrel 120. Differential pressure acts on an axial face 143 of the piston 142 when flow switch 200 is open thereby urging the piston 142 in the uphole direction. The piston engages drive ring 145 and retainer 146 which in turn engages the reaming block 150 such that translation of the piston 142 causes a corresponding translation and extension of the reaming block 150, as best shown in
A flow switch embodiment 200 is now described in more detail with respect to
A compression spring 226 is deployed in the lower chamber 224 between an end cap 228 and a shoulder portion 212 of the flow piston 210. The spring 226 is configured to bias the flow piston 210 in the uphole direction towards the first position such that sleeve 231 engages seat 232 thereby creating a solid contact seal 230. The solid contact seal 230 closes a flow channel 234 (
Flow switch 200 is configured to open flow channel 234 (
When the differential pressure between bore 126 and chamber 224 exceeds the predetermined upper threshold, the flow piston 210 begins to move in the downhole direction against the bias of the spring 226 and towards the second position. Movement of the flow piston 210 breaks the solid contact seal 230 and thereby begins to open flow channel 234, which allows drilling fluid to enter upper chamber 222 and act on face 216 of flow piston 210 and face 237 of retaining ring 236. High pressure drilling fluid in upper chamber 222 easily overcomes the biasing force of spring 226 (due to the fluid acting on the full annular seal area of the flow piston—i.e., the annular/upper chamber 222 area between seals 215 and 217). The flow piston 210 thus moves rapidly to the open position until it abuts end cap 228 as depicted at 229 in
Movement of the flow piston 210 to the open position provides full fluid communication between central bore 226 and upper chamber 222. As described above with respect to
It will be understood that the upper threshold is related to the configuration of spring 226 (e.g., the spring force) and the difference in seal area between the solid contact seal 230 and seal 215, while the lower threshold is related to the configuration of spring 226 and the annular seal area of the flow piston 210. In the depicted embodiment, the difference in seal area between the solid contact seal 230 and seal 215 is about one square inch while the annular seal area of the flow piston 210 is about 14 square inches, thereby resulting in an upper threshold to lower threshold ratio of about 14. While the disclosed embodiments are of course not limited in this regard, it may be advantageous in certain applications to configure the downhole tool such that it has an upper threshold to lower threshold ratio in the range from about 5 to about 25. Ratios greater than about 5 tend to advantageously provide a wide differential pressure (or bore flow rate) window in which the flow switch 200 (
With reference again to
While one or more embodiments of the pressure activated flow switch are described with respect to underreamer embodiments depicted on
Although one or more pressure activated flow switch embodiments and their advantageous deployment in downhole drilling tools have been disclosed, it should be understood to those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes, substitutions, and alternations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3224507 | Cordary | Dec 1965 | A |
3425500 | Fuchs | Feb 1969 | A |
4055226 | Weber | Oct 1977 | A |
4466336 | Broome et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4491187 | Russell | Jan 1985 | A |
4714116 | Brunner | Dec 1987 | A |
5139098 | Blake | Aug 1992 | A |
5318137 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5318138 | Dewey et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5332048 | Underwood | Jul 1994 | A |
5443129 | Bailey | Aug 1995 | A |
5518073 | Manke et al. | May 1996 | A |
6289911 | Majkovic | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289999 | Dewey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6732817 | Dewey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7281584 | McGarian | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7445059 | Falgout | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7493971 | Nevlud et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506703 | Campbell | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513318 | Underwood | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7597158 | Campbell | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20030111267 | Pia | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030146023 | Pia | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030217850 | Shaw et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040134689 | Fujii | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20070089912 | Eddison | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070095573 | Telfer | May 2007 | A1 |
20070102163 | Heath | May 2007 | A1 |
20080110678 | Radford | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128175 | Radford | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080245574 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090032308 | Eddison | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100089583 | Xu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110284233 | Wu | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2305681 | Apr 1997 | GB |
2007144719 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/020405 dated Apr. 29, 2013: pp. 1-14. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130175095 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |