The field of the invention is a pressure actuated sleeve used in a cementing assembly that is responsive to tubing pressure to open a port and more particularly a sleeve that is associated with a piston where the piston is not referenced to annulus pressure when actuated by selective communication of tubing pressure to one side with the opposed side referenced to a low pressure chamber within the housing.
Prior sleeves that have been deployed in cementing service have been based on the concept of providing opposed piston areas exposed to tubing pressure that are of different dimensions so that raising the tubing pressure will create a sufficient net force to in theory overcome seal friction and move the sleeve to the open position. One such design is Halliburton Initiator Sliding Sleeve that has a larger upper seal diameter than a lower seal. Raising tubing pressure creates a net differential force and the piston is allowed to move because there is an atmospheric chamber between the upper and lower seals. The problem is that to get the lower seal to be smaller than the upper seal to create the desired net force in the needed direction, the wall of the sleeve adjacent the lower seal and the atmospheric chamber has to be reduced so that the sleeve can shift while the volume of the atmospheric chamber is reduced.
The wall of the sleeve in the area of the atmospheric chamber sees substantial differential pressure and can flex or bend. When that happens the sleeve gets stuck and the desired port opening in the housing fails to occur.
Apart from these designs there are sleeves that respond to tubing pressure with an associated piston that is open on one side to tubing pressure and on the other side to annulus pressure. Such a design is illustrated in US Publication 2011/0100643. This design cannot be used in cementing applications as the filling up of the annulus with cement can block access to annulus pressure. Furthermore, there is a leak path potential from the tubing to the annulus through a piston seal leak.
Various pressure operated sleeves for downhole use are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. and Publications: 7,703,510; 3,662,834; 4,330,039; 6,659,186; 6,550,541; 5,355,959; 4,718,494; 7,640,988; 6,386,289; US 2010/0236781 A1; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,649,597; 5,044,444; 5,810,087; 5,950,733; 5,954,135; 6,286,594; 4,434,854 and 3,189,044.
What is needed and provided by the present invention is an actuation technique for a sliding sleeve to open a port that responds to tubing pressure but addresses the flexing or bending problem associated with prior designs so that reliable movement of the sleeve is obtained. In the preferred embodiment the application of pressure to a predetermined level actually holds the sleeve closed because the piston area on the sleeve bottom at 31 is greater than the piston area at the top of the sleeve at 32. Doing this allows the sleeve wall near the atmospheric or low pressure chamber to be strong enough to resist bending or buckling under a predetermined differential pressure. When the pressure is built up access is provided to a piston on the sleeve that is referenced to a low pressure or atmospheric chamber. This can be done with breaking a rupture disc. The sleeve can then move to open the port or ports for annulus access so that tools can be pumped down with flow without having to perforate the casing which can save a run in the hole with a perforating gun. Those skilled in the art will better appreciate more aspects of the invention from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while recognizing that the full scope of the invention is to be determined by the appended claims.
A tubing pressure operated sliding sleeve is used in cementing a tubular string. The sleeve is configured to hold closed as pressure builds to a predetermined value. When pressure is further raised a rupture disc blows and provides access to an integral piston disposed outside the sleeve. The back side of the piston is exposed to a low pressure or atmospheric chamber located between upper and lower seals. The sleeve thickness near the chamber can be made relatively thick to avoid flexing or bending under differential pressure because the net force to shift the sleeve is from differential pressure on the piston rather than the piston areas created by the upper and lower seals.
Referring to
upper body tubular connection 1;
upper ported housing 2;
inner shifting sleeve 3;
port isolation seals 4;
upper internal polished bore 5;
fluid communication ports 6;
sleeve shear screw shoulder 7;
shear screws 8;
upper internal bore piston seals 9;
intermediate internal polished bore 10;
upper pressure testing port 11;
upper atmospheric chamber 12;
burst disk load nut 13;
burst disk load ring 14;
burst disk or chemically responsive barrier 15;
intermediate internal bore piston seals and piston 16;
sleeve lock ring retention groove 17;
lower internal polished bore 18;
lower atmospheric chamber 19;
sleeve lock ring retainer 20;
sleeve lock ring 21;
body seals 22;
body connection 23;
body set screws 24;
lower sleeve polished bore 25;
lower pressure testing port 26;
lower external rod piston seals 27;
lower body 28; and
lower body tubular connection 29.
The valve is run in open-hole cementable completions just above the float equipment. The valve is connected to the casing; through the upper body tubular connection (1) at the top and the lower body tubular connection (29) at the bottom. The structural valve body is made-up of an upper ported housing (2) and lower body (28). Pressure integrity of the valve is maintained with the body seals (22). The body set screws (24) keep the body connection threads (23) from backing out during installation. Between the upper ported housing (2) and the lower body (28) is captured an inner shifting sleeve (3). The inner shifting sleeve (3) has several diameters that create piston areas that generate shifting forces to open the valve. The port isolation seals (4) located on the upper end of the inner shifting sleeve (3) and the upper internal bore piston seals (9) below the fluid communication ports (6) both act to isolate the inside of the valve during and after cementation. The larger intermediate internal bore piston seals (16) are used to drive down the inner shifting sleeve (3) along the lower internal polished bore (18) within the upper ported housing (2), once the burst disk (15) is ruptured. Both sets of seals operate within their respective polished bores (5, 10) within the upper ported housing (2). The lower external rod piston seals (27) located within the lower body (28) act to prevent cement from entering the lower atmospheric chamber (19) and wipe the outside diameter of the lower sleeve polished bore (25) during the opening of the valve. The inner shifting sleeve (3) also has a shoulder (7) that shears the shear screws (8) during the opening shift of the inner sleeve (3). An external sleeve lock ring retention groove (17) is located between the internal bore piston seals (16) and the lower sleeve polished bore (25) diameter. This recess will accept the sleeve lock ring (21) that is retained by the lock ring retainer (20) once the valve had fully opened. The sleeve lock ring (21) will prevent the inner shifting sleeve (3) from closing once the valve has fully opened.
Between the upper internal bore piston seals (9) and the intermediate internal bore piston seals (16) is created the upper atmospheric chamber (12) which contains air that can be independently tested through the upper pressure test port (11). Between the intermediate internal bore pistons seals (16) and the lower external rod piston seals (27) is created a lower atmospheric chamber (19) which also contains air that can be independently tested through a lower pressure testing port (26). A burst disk (15) is held into place within a port located on the outside of the inner shifting sleeve (3) by a load ring (14) and a load nut (13). The burst disk load nut (13) is sized to allow significant torque and load to be transferred into the burst disk (15) prior to installation of the inner shifting sleeve (3) within the valve.
The valve is run on casing and cemented into place within the well. After cementation the valve is scraped with wiper dart prior to actuation. Once the cement has set on the outside of the valve, it is ready to be opened with a combination of high hydrostatic and applied pressure. Once the burst pressure is reached, the burst disk (15) opens the upper atmospheric chamber (12) to the applied pressure. This pressure acts on the piston area created by the upper internal bore piston seals (9) and the larger intermediate internal bore piston seals (16) and drives the inner shifting sleeve (3) down compressing the air within the lower atmospheric chamber (19) and opening the fluid communication ports (6) on the upper ported housing (2). Once the inner shifting sleeve (3) is completely shifted and in contact with the upward facing shoulder on the lock ring retainer (20), the sleeve lock ring (21) falls into the sleeve lock retention groove (17) on the inner shifting sleeve (3) preventing the valve from subsequently closing.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the use of the rupture disc for piston access is simply the preferred way and generally more accurate than relying exclusively on shearing a shear pin. A pressure regulation valve can also be used for such selective access as well as a chemically responsive barrier that goes away in the presence of a predetermined substance or energy field, temperature downhole or other well condition for example, schematically illustrated by arrow 30, to move the sleeve. Chamber (12), once the rupture disc burst is under tubing pressure so wall flexure at that location is minimized. Even before the rupture disc breaks the size of chamber (12) is sufficiently small to avoid sleeve wall flexing in that region. The use of a large boss to support the seal (16) also strengthens the sleeve (3) immediately above the chamber (19), thus at least reducing flexing or bending that could put sleeve (3) in a bind before it fully shifted. The slightly larger dimension of seal (27) than seal (4) that holds the sleeve (3) closed initially also allows a greater wall thickness for sleeve (3) near the chamber (19) to further at least reducing flexing or bending to allow the sleeve (3) to fully shift without getting into a bind.
The piston (16) can be integral to the sleeve (3) or a separate structure. Chamber (19) has an initial pressure of atmospheric or a predetermined value less than the anticipated hydrostatic pressure within sleeve (3). The volume of chamber (19) decreases and its internal pressure rises as sleeve (3) moves to open port (6).
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
443454 | Kitsee | Dec 1890 | A |
3054415 | Baker et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
3189044 | Sizer | Jun 1965 | A |
3442328 | Nutter | May 1969 | A |
3662834 | Young | May 1972 | A |
3831680 | Edwards et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3930540 | Holden et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3964544 | Farley et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3986554 | Nutter | Oct 1976 | A |
4109724 | Barrington | Aug 1978 | A |
4257484 | Whitley et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4284152 | Adams, Jr. | Aug 1981 | A |
4330039 | Vann et al. | May 1982 | A |
4403659 | Upchurch | Sep 1983 | A |
4427070 | O'Brien | Jan 1984 | A |
4434854 | Vann et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4515217 | Stout | May 1985 | A |
4691779 | McMahan et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4718494 | Meek | Jan 1988 | A |
4907655 | Hromas | Mar 1990 | A |
4979569 | Anyan et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4991654 | Brandell et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5044444 | Coronado | Sep 1991 | A |
5188183 | Hopmann et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5325917 | Szarka | Jul 1994 | A |
5355959 | Walter et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5511617 | Snider | Apr 1996 | A |
5649597 | Ringgenberg | Jul 1997 | A |
5676208 | Finley | Oct 1997 | A |
5765641 | Shy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5810087 | Patel | Sep 1998 | A |
5819853 | Patel | Oct 1998 | A |
5950733 | Patel | Sep 1999 | A |
5954135 | Williamson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6109354 | Ringgenberg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6148919 | Burris, II | Nov 2000 | A |
6186227 | Vaynshteyn et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6220357 | Carmichael et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230811 | Ringgenberg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6286594 | French | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293346 | Patel | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308783 | Pringle et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6386289 | Patel | May 2002 | B1 |
6397949 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6550541 | Patel | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6604582 | Flowers et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6659183 | Ward | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6659186 | Patel | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684950 | Patel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722439 | Garay et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6834726 | Giroux et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6907936 | Fehr et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6945331 | Patel | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948561 | Myron | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7063152 | Yeo | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7464758 | Yeo et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7562713 | Basmajian et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7640988 | Phi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7703510 | Xu | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7762324 | Clem | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7841412 | Jasser et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845416 | Turner et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7909095 | Richards et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7913770 | Schramm et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8171994 | Murray et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8261761 | Gerrard et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8276670 | Patel | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8789600 | O'Connell et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9303501 | Fehr et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20040118566 | Krywitsky | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20080066923 | Xu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090065194 | Frazier | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090065212 | DCosta | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100236781 | Mytopher et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110056679 | Rytlewski | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110100643 | Themig et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114324 | Hayter et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110259582 | Krywitsky | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110278017 | Themig et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120006553 | Korkmaz | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120048559 | Ganguly et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120085548 | Fleckenstein | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120186803 | Xu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120211242 | Patel | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120267119 | Patel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120285702 | Rytlewski | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120305265 | Garcia | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130043041 | McCoy | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2012115868 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2012145735 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Baker Hughes Incorporated, Product Report, Open Hole Completion Systems, “Pressure Actuated Cementing Valve” Product Family No. H30112, 2001. |
Baker Oil Tools, Sliding Sleeves, “Model CMP Non-Elastomeric Cirulating Sliding Sleeve” Product Family No. H81081, 2002. |
Baker Oil Tools; Sliding Sleeves; “Model CMP “Defender” Non-Elastomeric Circulating Sliding Sleeve” Product Family No. H81082, 2002. |
Otis Engineering Corportation; Production Packer Equipment and Services OT1S; “Pressure-Operated Circulating Sleeve Used With Otis Single and Dual Packer Installations” General Sales Catalog, 1985. |
Halliburton; Completion Products, Second Edition, 1997. |
Larimore, et al; SPE 64527; Overcoming Completion Challenges with Interventionless Devices—Case Histories of The “Disappearing Plug”, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., 2000. |
Schlumberger, KickStart Rupture Disc Valve, Date unknown, 1 page. |
Delta Stim Initiator Valve Drawing, HAL24633, date unknown, 1 page. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13193902 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 14881804 | US |